Quantcast
Channel: Vindicating Michael
Viewing all 230 articles
Browse latest View live

AEG-Jacksons trial DAY 24. Randy Phillips SLAPPED Michael Jackson

$
0
0

Randy Phillips, top man and President of AEG Live SLAPPED Michael Jackson and almost no one in the media wrote about it.

I just slapped himThis guy slapped Michael and is now explaining it by the need to go a press-conference. His earlier version was that Michael was “drunk”, however when questioned under oath he says that it was an “exaggeration”.

Michael was sober and that press-conference was not even needed as with half a million people already in the queue it did not really matter – they could release a public statement instead.

Randy Phillips slapped Michael because he wanted that press-conference and was forcing him to go there. From the very start of it he was showing his ‘partner’ who was the boss there and who was to obey.

This is how their cooperation started, and this is how it ended too – by them grinding him down to his death. And all Michael saw from his ‘partners’ from the start to finish of this ‘cooperation’ was humiliation, bullying, insults and contempt.

The physical insult of the slap was followed by a further insult of adding 40 more shows to which Michael never agreed. No person in his right mind will now believe that Michael was even asked for a permission to increase the number of shows – who asks for a permission of a person whom you’ve just slapped? Even if AEG asked it was a mere formality which did not matter.

I think I even know why Michael didn’t want to show himself to the public at that early a stage. Dr. Klein said he was doing some cosmetic procedures which were far from finished, so Karen Faye had to apply too much make-up to his face which is why Michael looked so different from the way he looked in the later months when we saw him in the film.

So he even had a solid reason to refuse. And vulnerable as he was after so many years of seclusion he was afraid to show himself to the public fearful of the reception he would get.  But none of it mattered to Randy Phillips. This methodical guy cared only for his own plans and this is why he slapped Michael and then made him attend every rehearsal though both were a terrible violation of Michael’s rights.

When he is fired from AEG Phillips should look for a job in a prison in some God-forsaken place – his manners are just the right ones for an overseer over the local inmates in case the human rights activists are not watching there.

After more or less getting over the shock of the slap I naturally went to see what the media was saying about this outrage. But over here another shock was awaiting me – a day after the incident became known the media was still not writing about it. They were not even mentioning it let alone giving an assessment of it.

did you slap him -no, yes 2Everything was there – AEG’s old lies about Michael being ‘drunk and despondent, AEG exec saying that it is ‘extortion’, “Murray working for Michael and not AEG”, etc.  –  everything except the shock of the slap Phillips gave to Michael Jackson. There was simply nothing about it, as if it never happened and was never discussed at the trial.

Now I am beginning to understand the inner logic of this theatre of the absurd. The current headlines about the alleged ‘drunk’ state of Michael Jackson are setting the right scenery for the spectators and when the curtain falls and the slap is finally mentioned, everyone will think that Michael was in such a state that he deserved it.

But all this loud story of MJ being “drunk and despondent” is a BIG LIE and this was already proven at the trial.

Phillips shifts all the blame for the lie onto Tohme who was allegedly the one who initially said it, Tohme says (in Sullivan’s book) that it was Randy Phillips’ exaggeration and Gongaware who was also present at the press-conference says that Michael Jackson was sober and was not even smelling of alcohol.

Actually we don’t even need the testimonies of these people as we saw the press-conference ourselves and did not notice any signs of intoxication.

When confronted with his own deposition Randy Phillips explains that Michael was NOT drunk and was NOT despondent:

Q. Was Mr. Jackson drunk? 

A. No. Not to the best of my knowledge, no.

Q. Ok. Was he despondent? 

A. No. 

Q. Now, sir, you testified there that Mr. Jackson was not drunk and he was not despondent, correct?

A. There? Yes.

Tohme and his lawyer Dennis Hawk call Phillips’ words an ‘exaggeration’:

drunk - NO

A excerpt from the testimony of Paul Gongaware who was also present at the press-conference

“MJ is locked up in his room drunk and despondent,” Phillips wrote in an e-mail to his boss Tim Leiweke.

“ Are you kidding me?” was the reply Leiweke sent back minutes later. Just the day before, AEG’s corporate chief had attended a music-industry symposium where he answered a question about Michael Jackson’s readiness for a concert series by saying, “ The man is very sane, the man is very focused, the man is very healthy.” “ I [am] trying to sober him up,” a frantic Phillips wrote to Leiweke, as the appointed time of the O2 press conference approached. “ I screamed at him so loud the walls are shaking. He is an emotionally paralyzed mess riddled with self loathing and doubt now that it is show time.”

He and Tohme actually had to dress Michael to get him prepared for the press conference, Phillips wrote to Leiweke: “ He is scared to death.”

More than three years later, Tohme would say that Phillips’s e-mails “exaggerated” Michael’s condition. Dennis Hawk agreed. “He might have drunk a couple of glasses of wine to relax,” Hawk said. “I wouldn’t have blamed him if he drank a whole bottle, given how big the moment was for him.” [R.Sullivan]

And Paul Gongaware who was an eye-witness to the press-conference said that Michael gave him a hug and did not even smell of alcohol:

Did Randy ever tell you that Michael was drunk and despondent before that press conference?
A   No, not drunk and despondent.
Q  Did he say something else?
A  He just said he was having a hard time getting — getting him going.
Q  And did he explain that further?
A  No.
Q  Did you have an understanding of what he meant?
A  I — no. I was just too busy at the press conference.

Q. Describe a little bit the scene. Was there any press?

A. Not in the area backstage. He walked into that area and he saw me and he came up to me and he gave me a big hug. And he whispered in my ear, he said, “make sure the teleprompter has big words. I don’t have my glasses.”

Q. OK. Were there Teleprompters to assist him?

A. Yes.

Q. All right. And what big words for what? What did he need words for?

A. On the Teleprompters.

Q. OK. How did he seem to you?

A. He was good.

Q. Did you say anything back?

A. I said OK.

Q. OK. Who did he arrive with?

A. He came with Dr. Tohme, Randy, some security. I don’t remember who else was with him.

Q. So after he gave you that hug and told you he’d forgot his glasses, what happened next?

A. Then I said, “are you ready?” he went, “yeah, let’s go.” and then we had like an emcee, I guess you’d call it, that went up and sort of announced  you know, made the announcement, “here’s Michael Jackson.”

Q. Now, when he came in and hugged you and spoke to you, did he seem inebriated in any way to you?

A. No.

Q. Did he seem drunk?

A. No.

Q. Did he smell of alcohol?

A. No.

Q. Did he seem altered in any way?

A. No.

An excerpt from Randy Phillips's deposition

An excerpt from Randy Phillips’s deposition

So Michael was absolutely not in a condition in which Phillips initially described him and therefore he did not have even a pretext for slapping Michael Jackson to bring a ‘drunken’ person to his senses.

Michael was SOBER and let us remember it once and for all.

But Phillips nevertheless did hit him. We learned about this abominable deed from the trial transcript posted on TMJ and if it were not for the transcripts we would not even know of the slap incident as even the ABC 7 Court News tweets somehow managed to omit this crucial fact.

From the transcript we learn that the truth was found out from an email Randy Phillips wrote to the transportation people waiting downstairs to take them to the press-conference. He said, “I just slapped him” and when pressed for an answer at the trial involved himself and the Jacksons’ attorney in a long and enduring dispute.

Panish asked him about him hitting Michael as if in passing:

Q. Then by the way, did you hit Mr. Jackson ?

A. No.

Q. Ok. Well, let’s see what you said at the top of that page at 712/17. Why don’t you read what you said, sir?

A. This is in response to getting the transportation set up. I said:  “you guys are going to follow us behind a 12-passenger bus back there. I just slapped him and screamed at him louder than I did with Arthur Cassell.”

Q. Who is Arthur Cassell?

A. Arthur Cassell is one of the most annoying human beings on the face of the earth [….]

Q. But this time you screamed louder at Mr. Jackson, didn’t you?

A. Well, that’s what I wrote, but that’s not what I did.

Q. And you slapped Mr. Jackson, didn’t you?

A. You ever see a coach with a football team getting ready to leave; ok? And I created..

Q. Sir, could you please answer my question? Did you write you just slapped Mr. Jackson ?

A. You want a “yes” or ”no” that doesn’t tell the story of what actually happened? What do you want? Ok. When we were I know what you want.

Q. Did you write that you just slapped Mr. Jackson ? “yes” or “no”?

A. No.

Q. Ok. You didn’t write “I just slapped him”?

A. Yeah, I wrote that.

Q. Ok. But that’s an exaggeration again; right?

A. No. I slapped him.

Q. But you slapped him, oh, like a nice slap, like, oh, come on, let’s go, and then you screamed. Louder than you did at Arthur Cassell; is that correct?

A. Here’s what I did; ok? This was a very tense situation. And, you know, frankly, I created the tension in that room; ok?

Q. Sir, I …

A. Because I was so nerve-racked, ok, the time slipping away, and his career slipping away; ok?

Q. When you wrote “I just slapped him,” was that an exaggeration?

A. Nah. I slapped him on the butt.

Q. Ok. And when you screamed louder than you did at Arthur Cassell, and that time the windows shook in your office, was that another exaggeration?

A. At the time it was an exaggeration, yes.

Q. So that’s another exaggeration?

A. It was an exaggeration.

He slapped him and now says that it was on the butt. However slapping a 50 year old man on the butt is also an insult, only not as spectacular and open as a slap in the face.

And it wasn’t on the butt – Randy Phillips is lying again. If it was some “nice” and friendly slap as Randy Phillips says it was, he would not have written about it in his email:

  • “You  guys are going to follow us behind a 12-passenger bus back there. I just slapped him and screamed at him louder than I did with Arthur Cassell.”

No, guys,  unfortunately it was a slap in the face as this was the whole idea of it among all that yelling.

And judging by the force of his yelling I am also afraid that it was not a mere touch.

What’s also horrible about it is that Randy Phillips boasted of his feat to his surrounding.

Not only did he insult the 50 year old man whose dignity, genius, fame and ‘selling capacity’ were to be respected and even awed at, but he wanted the employees of his company to know of the insult and humiliation he subjected Michael to. I wonder what looks they gave Michael when he was getting into their bus and how he felt at that moment and forever after.

6The tears of humiliation are the hardest to swallow.

Well, once Shawn Trell opened the hunting season for Michael by calling him a “freak” just prior to signing their contract, it was inevitable for this style to be upheld by everyone else at AEG.  This must have been the prevailing AEG approach towards Jackson throughout their ‘cooperation’ and this must have been the atmosphere in which all those rehearsals, negotiations, discussions were taking place. It simply could not be any different – when bosses give a nod to some outrage those under them lose their ability to behave decently and acquire the same  style too. Human nature, you know.

However conscience is a dangerous thing to discard and some day their meanness and lack of humanity will backfire at them, and all of it because they threw away their conscience as some unnecessary trash at the time when it was needed most.

I wonder how those in the media feel now that they are forced to come to terms with their conscience too. Their natural instinct tells them that they should report the absolutely abominable news that the top AEG guy slapped Michael Jackson, and give to it a proper assessment but they have to keep silent or justify Phillips’ actions by Michael being “drunk” (which he was not).

I refuse to believe that none of them are appalled by the news. At least some of them should have some shreds of conscience left and it should be urging them to write about it as their duty calls on them to.

Poor journalists. They have to stifle their indignation and keep their mouth shut because they have to obey the instructions of their editors. They need to keep their jobs and feed their families, and bargaining with their conscience is the price they have to pay for betraying the truth.

Poor editors. They have to listen to the media owners setting to them the limits within which reporting about Michael Jackson is allowed. A ‘freak’ can be widely reported because it will only enhance the Jackson image portrayed by them earlier, but telling the whole truth about that abominable scene is out of the question. This unpleasant truth may undermine the whole building they have been constructing around Michael Jackson for too long – that  ’he is the only one to blame for his troubles,’ and therefore any inside information about him being humiliated, bullied and harassed by someone like AEG is almost impossible to report.

However for some journalists freedom is evidently dearer. Richard Johnson of the New York Post, for example, impressed me by telling the truth as soon as it became known at the trial (unfortunately the headline of his article leaves much to be desired):

….To another business associate, Phillips wrote: “I haven’t pulled it off yet. We still have to get his nose on properly. You have no idea what this is like. He is a self-loathing emotionally paralyzed mess… I just slapped him.”

Phillips admitted, “I slapped him on the butt.”

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/concert_announced_says_michael_jackson_ijUw9hdUs0c7ESwTJRGxON

And Charles Thomson went even further. Not only did he tell the truth about Phillips hitting Michael but he even expressed an opinion on the behavior of his colleagues. He called all this media silence utterly incriminating which it sure is:

AEG boss Randy Phillips admitted in court this week that he hit Michael Jackson because he wasn’t ready to go to a press conference. ‘Screamed at him so loud the walls shook’, then hit him.

I can find only one news outlet on Google News which is running this story. Every single other outlet on the planet seems to have left it out of their coverage. Utterly incriminating.

https://www.facebook.com/CharlesThomsonJournalist/posts/10151637411331998

While  I was writing this post the first news of the slap finally appeared in some media outlets. All of them come under one headline as if copied from one source, which is evidently the article by Alan Duke ” I slapped despondent Michael Jackson”.

Out of the now infamous exaggeration Duke uses only ‘despondent’  and gives a rather detailed account of Phillips’ testimony, but does not focus on the crucial fact that in his deposition Phillips admitted that Michael was not drunk and thus gave absolutely no grounds to Phillips to treat him that way.

So by now we have three journalists writing about this abominable scene and several more outlets reprinting Alan Duke’s story which is a sign of some improvements at last. All is not lost guys, if we have three journalists brave enough to raise their voice in favor of the truth.

*  *  *

Here are some excerpts from Randy Phillips’ testimony the transcript of which I found on the heroic TeamMichaelJackson site: http://teammichaeljackson.com/archives/8709

While the media is proving itself worthless such independent sources of information are absolutely priceless for us.  I will never cease to ask my readers to help the Team to buy the transcripts – we still have a long way to go and the transcripts are a costly pleasure, so they are in constant need of new funds:  http://teammichaeljackson.com/archives/8530

*  *  *

Randy Phillips’ testimony on June 5 is a complete revelation from the very start of it. For example, we learn that he ‘never read’ their contract with Michael Jackson and familiarized himself only with its summary prepared by Kathy Jorrie. This lie is intended to absolve Phillips of the atrocities their contract was filled with:

Q. Before Michael Jackson died, you never reviewed his contract with AEG correct?

A. Before Michael Jackson died? I did review the contract when I signed it before I signed it.

Q. Ok. So let’s play your deposition, sir.

Q. Ok. Now, your deposition was taken on January 17th, 2013; correct?

A. Correct.

Q. And then you signed under penalty of perjury on February 28th; correct?

A. Correct.

Q. So about six weeks later; right?

A. Correct.

Mr. Panish: ok. Let’s play the deposition.

(a video clip was played with the following testimony being said:) 

Q. Did you read the Jackson / AEG live contract in January of 2009? 

A. No.

Q. Never read that one? 

A. No. I read a summary of it, but I didn’t read the whole contract.” 

Q. Who prepared the summary you reviewed; sir?

A. Would have been Kathy Jorrie.

Q. Ok. When was that comprised for you, sir?

A. Prior to execution.

Q. Ok. So she where is the summary?

A. Where is the summary?

Q. Yeah.

A. Probably in my files. I don’t know.

The next passage confirms to us what we already know – AEG were dying to go into a deal with Michael Jackson but he was inaccessible to them, and the person who brought him to AEG was Tom Barrack. As you remember Tom Barrack set a deal between Michael Jackson and AEG as a condition for buying out the foreclosure note on Neverland. From the tone of AEG emails we understand that working with the man whom they called a “freak” behind his back was AEG’s most coveted desire:

Q. I’m handing you exhibit 8111, an e-mail chain. The top e-mail, June 22nd, 2009 see that before, sir?

A. Would you let me read it, please?

Q. Sure.

Q. Ok. Can you read for us first of all, you agree that Mr. Anschutz is a close friend of Tom Barrack; right?

A. Yeah. You asked me that already. I don’t know about friends, they were business associates.

Q. Ok. Why don’t you read what you wrote, sir?

A. Ok. In response to a request for tickets to one of Michael Jackson ‘s shows just trying not to take it out of context. I want to give it context.

Q. Sir, could you please…

A. “it would probably be tacky to not comp him since he is the real reason we have MJ tell him we have comp’d seats and offer him a suite at some hard cost charge. Phil a will be there, and they are close friends.”

Q. Ok. You’re referring to Mr. Barrack, aren’t you, sir?

A. Yes, I am.

Q. Ok. And you said,“ Mr. Barrack is the real reason we have MJdid you say that, sir?

A. Yeah, I did. In context.

Q. And did you say him and Phil are close friends?

A. I did.

Q. And is “Phil a” Mr. Anschutz?

A. Yes.

The talk about making films and the agreement Michael Jackson signed with AEG about film-making are a very important subject heavily underestimated by us up till now. In his testimony Shawn Trell said that AEG was to provide Michael with opportunities for making three films but the project was dropped as “no one was interested” though they allegedly were making enquiries about it here and there.

However Randy Phillips says that had a 3D Thriller film been made it would have been a big commercial success. The fact that AEG did not properly fulfill their duties under that agreement shows that all that talk about film-making was just a trap to lure Michael into the AEG deal, and once he was in it they simply dropped the film subject as an unnecessary one:

Q. Ok. Now, you knew that Michael Jackson was interested in making films; correct?

A. That is correct.

Q. And part of the negotiations for the tour agreement was including a film development agreement?

A. Yes.

Q. I want to show you exhibit – defense exhibit 12,246. It’s a development agreement for films. Is there any question in your mind Mr. Jackson didn’t want to make films?

A. Didn’t want to make films?

Q. Right.

A. No. He very much wanted to make films.

Q. Did you think he would be good at it?

A. I think “thriller” 3d would have been a winner. I’m not sure what other products he had in mind.

Q. You thought he was one of the most creative people you ever met; right?

A. In the music business.

Q. And that he ”thriller” 3d, you said “a winner.” you mean a smash, a hit?

A. In that terminology, yes.

Q. I mean, in the music business, you kind of say blew it out; right? He’d blow it out?

A. For the jury’s sake, a commercial success, yes.

Q. Ok. And no question in your mind “thriller” 3d would be a commercial success and make money?

A. “thriller” live action 3d, yes.

Then the talk goes over to the subject of Michael being in a rehab in 1993 and Randy Phillips amazes us by a statement that he never heard about it. You understood me right – everyone knows about Michael being in a rehab as he himself spoke about it on TV but Randy Phillips missed all of it and is learning about it from Panish only at this trial:

Q. And, sir, did you learn if Mr. Jackson went into substance rehabilitation, and that tour ended early?

A. No.

Q. You never heard that?

A. I don’t remember hearing it.

Q. Ok. And when’s the first time you heard that?

A. Just now.

However almost immediately after that we find out that Michael’s prescription medication use and alleged alcohol consumption were the subject of communication between the trio which was imposing the tour on Michael Jackson. Mr. Nanula from Colony Capital briefed Randy Phillips on media speculations in this respect and Phillips forwarded the email to no other than Tohme Tohme. By the way he called him a “doctor” in this email and drew his attention to ‘a lot of research’ done by a certain journalist. You may be interested to know that the journalist mentioned was Diane Dimond.

From Phillips’ deposition:

 Q. Exhibit 68 seems to be from Mr. Nanula forwarding you an article in the Sunday Independent  From December 7, 2008. Do you see that?

A. I see it. I don’t remember reading it.

Q. Ok. On the page that ends -6562, there’s a statement: ‘Jackson ‘s productivity could very well be suffering due to his alleged relationship with alcohol and prescription medication.’  Do you see that? 

A. Yeah. I see the paragraph.

Q. Ok. Somebody wrote that anyway; right?

A. Obviously. I’m reading it.

Q. Yeah. And you read it back at the time in 2008, didn’t you? 

A. I don’t remember reading this article at all.

Q. Ok. You wouldn’t … 

A. And I wouldn’t have put much credence in anything in the English press.

Q. Ok. When you know who Diane Dimond is, don’t you? 

A. I have no idea who she is.

Q. At least what she had quoted as saying is he’s had problems with alcohol and painkillers for  years. You saw that; right?

A. No.

Q. You see it now?  

A. I see it now. I didn’t see it then.

Q. And you we’ll put it up there this is forwarding the e-mail from Mr. Nanula; correct?

A. That is correct.

Q. Ok. And tell us what you wrote when you forwarded the article from Mr. Nanula that included references to drug and alcohol abuse.

A. I wrote: “doc, have you read these stories? This reporter did a lot of  Research. Rp.” 

From Phillips’ deposition again:

Q. Did you do anything between the time you received this article on December 8, 2008, to the time of Mr. Jackson’s death, to determine whether he had a problem with alcohol or painkillers? 

A. No.

Q. Or any other kind of narcotics or prescription drugs or just prescription drugs. We’ll leave it at that. 

A. No. I was strictly his promoter.

Q. Ok. You never asked Dr. Murray about that? 

A. No.

Now we are finally getting closer to the London press-conference and learn an interesting detail about the events prior to it. It turns out that it was already then that Michael was not on speaking terms with Tohme as he had arranged an auction Michael never allowed. Randy Phillips called the auction “stupid’.

By the way all the damages and losses under the auctioneer’s lawsuit had to be paid by Michael Jackson.

It is over here that the subject of being “drunk and despondent” and yelling at Michael is first raised. Phillips turns each word he wrote in his emails into a huge argument over their semantics. Now he says that yelling was an exaggeration and Randy Phillips just “raised his voice” – which seems to be a kind of a mantra with him as he repeats it to all the questions asked.

The version of a “hangover” from the previous day was worked out by Phillips in the course of 30 hours of consultations with his lawyer and is another of his lies – a hangover from “last night” gives a much bigger smell than the actual drinking, and Gongaware said that MJ was not even smelling of alcohol though Michael actually hugged him and whispered into his ear about not having his glasses on:

Q. Now, sir, there was a press conference for the “This Is It” tour in March of 2009; is that correct?

A. Correct.

Q. And you were there; right?

A. Correct.

Q. And was it March 5th, to your recollection?

A. It was March 5th.

Q. And you and Mr. Jackson were late to that press conference; correct?

A. That is correct.

Q. Was it a miracle that the press conference even happened?

A. Pretty much, yes.

Q. Is that a “yes”?

A. That’s a “yes.”

Q. Were you late because Mr. Jackson was drunk and despondent?

A. By the time I saw him, he had a hangover from drinking. At one point he must have been drunk, yes.

Q. Sir, my question was: were you late because Mr. Jackson was drunk and despondent?

A. Correct.

Q. So that’s a “yes”?

A. That’s a “yes.”

Q. Ok. I’d like to show you exhibit 100 when you’re ready, let me know.

A. Ok.

Q. Ok. Let’s show that. Now, sir, this was one of those e-mails you were shown for preparing for your testimony?

A. Correct.

Q. Is this an e-mail you wrote on March 8th, 2009?

A. Yes.

Q. And is Mr. Morey a former manager of Mr. Jackson?

A. Yes, he was.

Q. Can you tell us the yellowed-out lines that I wrote? Could you read those that I’ve yellowed out? Could you please read those for me, sir, what you wrote to Mr. Morey on March 8, 2009?

A “MJ was not speaking to Dr. Tohme because of the stupid auction set up that MJ never agreed to until the day they left for London on the Gulfstream I chartered.”

Q. “Gulfstream,” is that an airplane?

A. It’s a jet.

Q. Is a jet an airplane?

A. Of course.

Q. So gulfstream is an airplane that you chartered to take people to London?

A. Correct.

Q. Who went on the plane?

A. To the best of my knowledge, it was Michael Jackson, his three children; hair and makeup artist whose name I can’t remember, and Dr. Tohme.

Q. Ok.

A. And Alberto Alvarez, security.

Q. And you didn’t travel with them?

A. No.

Q. Did you travel on your own?

A. Yes.

Q. Did you have your own Gulfstream?

A. No.

Q. You went commercial?

A. Yeah. I’m just a working guy.

Q. Mr. Anschutz didn’t lend you one of his planes to go?

A. No.

Mr. Putnam: objection.

Judge: I’m sorry. Didn’t lend him?

Q. Didn’t lend you one of the planes he uses?

Mr. Putnam: objection. Relevance, your honor.

Judge: sustained.

Q. Ok. So could you read the next line that you wrote, sir?

A. Yes. “the fact that the press conference even happened is a miracle, let alone getting through the unprecedented demands for shows that has caught us off guard.”

Q. Ok. Was that true, sir?

A. Correct.

Q. It was true that the press conference happening was a miracle; correct?

A. Yes.

Q. Now, sir, I’d like to play your deposition, page 59, 19 to 25; 60, line 20, to 62, line 12; and 62/15 to 63/25, regarding this issue. While they’re reviewing that, I want to ask you a couple questions.  Did you yell at Mr. Jackson?

A. Did I yell or did I shout?

Q. Did you yell? Y-e-l-l.

A. I raised my voice.

Q. Did you yell at Mr. Jackson?

A. I raised my voice.

Q. So the answer is you didn’t yell at Mr. Jackson?

A. I think when I wrote that, I was exaggerating.

Q. Sir, do you know what it means to yell at someone?

A. Yes.

Q. Did you yell at Mr. Jackson ? “yes” or “no”?

A. In the two and a half hours that this all took place, ok, it’s very hard if you take it out of Context, the answer is not going to make any sense, anyway.

Q. Sir….

Mr. Panish: your honor, could I ask that he answer the question?

Judge: yes.

Mr. Panish: it’s a very straightforward question.

Judge: just “yes” or “no.”

Q. Did you yell at Mr. Jackson ? “yes” or “no”?

A. I raised my voice.

Q. So the answer is no, you did not yell; correct?

A. Matter of interpretation.

Q. Did you scream at Mr. Jackson?

A. I raised my voice.

Q. So you did not scream at Mr. Jackson ; correct?

A. At the time, I felt like I may have screamed. I just raised my voice.

Q. Sir, did you or did you not scream at Mr. Jackson at this time? “yes” or “no” or “I don’t remember”?

A. I can’t answer the question that way.

Mr. Panish: your honor, I think it’s a pretty straightforward question

Judge: I can’t force him to answer it.

Mr. Panish: it’s “yes,” “no” or “I don’t remember.”

Judge: the answer is what the answer is.

Q. So you can’t answer the question; right?

A. No more than I just did. I raised my voice because it was a very tense situation towards the end of getting him ready to leave, and we were two hours late.

Q. So you will not admit that you yelled at Mr. Jackson or screamed at him; correct, sir?

A. I will admit that I raised my voice, and I got agitated towards the end of this period of time because we were so late for this press conference.

Q. Ok. Let’s play the deposition and see what you said at your deposition about this.

(a video clip was played with the following testimony being said:)

Q. All right. Mr. Phillips, exhibit 6 is a an e-mail that was produced by AEG live in this litigation, first from Mr. Morey to you, and then you responding to Mr. Morey. You see that? 

A. I’m reading it right now.

Q. My question is simply, is this an e-mail you got from Mr. Morey and an e-mail you responded to Mr. Morey? based on the headers, 

A. Yes.

Q. Ok. And it was produced by AEG live. You see the production stamp at the bottom; right?

A. Right. 

Q. There’s some language up at the top that talks about that you you wrote the top of this; correct? 

A. That is correct.

Q. And you wrote: ‘MJ was not speaking to Dr. Tohme because of this stupid auction he set up that MJ never agreed to”.

A.  Correct.

Q. Is that what you were just telling us about, the Julien’s auction?

A. That is correct.

Q. And then there’s language about the day they left for London. Is that the press conference for the ‘this is it’ tour?

A. That is correct..

Q. Then you wrote: ‘the fact that the press conference even happened is a miracle.’ do you see that?

A. I see that..

Q. What did you mean by that? 

A. To the best of my knowledge, at the time, the fact that Dr. Tohme and Michael were not in constant contact with each other, and we were dealing with Dr. Tohme on the logistics of the press conference and that that’s what I meant. I had to rely on Dr. Tohme to bring Michael and Michael for Michael ‘s participation in the press conference, and if they were estranged, I had no one to deal with.

Q. Was there a problem, Mr. Phillips, with Mr. Jackson’s appearance at the press conference that day? 

A. Are you talking about when he went to the microphone and was photographed?

Q. Well, I was thinking, actually, really, hours before going to the microphone and being  photographed. Did something unusual happen? 

A. We were late.

Q. Why? 

A. To the best of my knowledge, based on statements made to me by Dr. Tohme, Michael was scared of the reception he was going to get because he hadn’t been in the public eye in so long and that he might be hung over.

Q. Hung over?That’s what Dr. Tohme told you? 

A. Correct.

Q. But you didn’t see that yourself? 

A. At one point during the afternoon, I went into the room as Michael was getting prepared, and he seemed a bit ‘hung over’ would be I mean, I’m not an expert and I don’t drink, so I’ve never been hung over, so it’s just an observation.

Q. Well, my hunch is, in 30 years in the music industry, you may have seen somebody hung over at some point. No? 

A. Actually, no.

Q. How about drunk people? 

A. Yes.

Q. Ok. Was Mr. Jackson drunk? 

A. No. Not to the best of my knowledge, no.

Q. Ok. Was he despondent? 

A. No. 

Q. Now, sir, you testified there that Mr. Jackson was not drunk and he was not despondent, correct?

A. There? Yes.

Let me break this Randy Phillips’ theatrical performance and note that when the media bombards us now with headlines like “AEG exec says he was drunk and despondent” it is nothing but an intentional lie because at this stage the media is absolutely obliged to know that all AEG bosses said that that story was an exaggeration which in back translation from the AEG language means that it was a LIE.

Randy Phillips’ continues with his stories and like all others at AEG surprises us by not knowing why his immediate boss Tim Leiweke was fired. For some reason they are not allowed to talk about it and for the same reason our curiosity about it is only growing – no atrocity is bad enough for AEG, so what could Leiweke do that made Anschutz  fire him?

Q. Is that one of the 30 e-mails you reviewed in the over 30 hours of preparation you did with your lawyers?

A. That is correct.

[..] Q. Ok. Let’s look at the bottom. This is March 5th. Is that the day of the press conference?

A. That’s correct.

Q. Ok. Why don’t you read for us by the way, who are you writing this e-mail to?

A. To Tim Leiweke.

Q. And refresh my recollection. Who is Tim Leiweke?

A. Tim Leiweke was the CEO of AEG

Q. And is that one of the people who you directly reported to?

A. Yes.

Q. And would you say that he’s in charge of all the AEG operations here?

A. Correct.

Q. At that time?

A. At that time, yes.

Q. And he’s no longer with the company, and you don’t know why he left, and you never talked to him about it; right?

A. About why he left?

Q. Yeah.

A. No.

Q. You don’t know whether Mr. Anschutz fired him?

Ms. Stebbins: objection. Relevance.

Judge: overruled.

Mr. Phillips: I do not know why he left. We were told, all of us at the company, to not engage in discussions about that. But Tim is still a very good friend of mine, and he has a very big job now.

Q. Who told you not to discuss that?

A. Uhm, Dan. And just, it’s not something for us to engage in speculation about, the other executives.

Q. Sir, you said you were specifically instructed not to discuss why Mr. Leiweke left the company; correct?

A. With Tim, correct, yes. Nor did Tim discuss it with us.

Q. Sir, I’m only asking about you just told us that you were specifically instructed not to discuss why Mr. Leiweke left the company with anyone; correct?

A. Correct.

Q. And was that an e-mail that you received?

A. No, no.

Q. Was that a meeting?A. It was a conversation.

Q. Who was present when the conversation occurred?

Ms. Stebbins: your honor, I’m going to object to relevance, this entire line of questions.

Mr. Panish: goes to Mr. Leiweke’s bias as a witness and credibility.

Ms. Stebbins: your honor, this has nothing to do with this. The case is about the negligent hiring of Dr. Conrad Murray in 2009, not why Mr. Leiweke left the company in 2013. And Mr. Phillips already testified he doesn’t know why Mr. Leiweke left the company.

Judge: overruled.

Q. You remember the question after those objections?

A. How could I forget? Ok. They, Tim and Phil Anschutz had a disagreement, I’m sure, ok, and whatever it was, they mutually decided that it was time for Tim to move on. That’s all we know.

Q. That wasn’t even my question, sir.

A. No. I’m trying to answer your question.

Q. Ok. So he was fired?

A. You can say he was fired; ok? That doesn’t make it true….

A long discussion follows about Phillips not knowing why Tim Leiweke left. Dan Beckerman is the new CEO of the AEG parent organization and is the new boss of Randy Phillips.

To his predecessor Tim Leiweke Phillips said that he yelled at Michael so loud that the walls were shaking. Now he is refuting each word said in that email – he did not yell, he just raised his voice and was just ‘a little firm’ and ‘more affirmative’ than usual. The word ‘scary’ was an over-reaction and the reason for being ‘affirmative’ was because they were waiting for a certain item of clothing for Michael and the wait was taking too long.

You will agree that being late for the press-conference because they were waiting for a certain item of clothing is a decidedly different version from the previous explanation.  Assuming that now Randy Phillips is finally telling the truth this is how big a difference between the truth and lies might be in case we deal with people like AEG.

I wonder where the media is now and why they are not printing their stories under correct headlines: “AEG exec waited for two hours for a piece of clothing for MJ” or “AEG exec was kidding about MJ drunk and despondent” or “AEG exec says ‘scary’ and ‘yelling’ were an over-reaction”. Why indeed don’t we see any headlines like the above?

Q. Why don’t you read us what you sent to Mr. Leiweke at 5:49 p.m. London time.

A. I said: “MJ is locked in his room drunk and despondent. Tohme and I are trying to sober him up and get him to the press conference with his hairdresser/makeup artist.”

Q. Now, sir, just one second. Let’s go up to the next e-mail that Mr. Leiweke wrote you back. He wrote back, looks like, two hours later; right? Approximately?

A. Yeah. 7:29.

Q. Yeah.

A.“Are you kidding me?”

Q. He wanted to know if you were pulling a gag on him; right?

A. No. I think he just felt that it was incredulous that this was happening at this time.

Q. Ok. What did you write back? Let’s see what you wrote back to him in response. And you wrote this now at 7:33. So if we advance it eight hours help me out. What time would it be? You’re a numbers guy.

A. I’m the numbers man? Ok. It would make it 5:33 in the afternoon.

Q. London time?

A. Correct.

Q. Ok. So read to us what you told your boss, Mr. Leiweke.

A.“I screamed at him so loud the walls are shaking. Tohme and I have dressed him, and they are finishing his hair, and then we are rushing to the 02. This is the scariest thing I have ever seen. He’s an emotionally paralyzed mess, filled with self-loathing and doubt now that it is how time. He is scared to death. Right now I just want to get through this press conference.”

Mr. Panish: all right. Now, I want to play what you testified at your deposition. Page 64, 1to16, and page 64, 22, to 65 64/22 to 65/21. Did I already play that? No, I didn’t. Is that ok?

Mr. Putnam: (no response.)

Mr. Panish: ok. You can play that. (A video clip was played with the following testimony being said:)

Q. Did you yell at him? 

A. At some time during the afternoon, I you know, the word ‘yell’ might be a little bit extreme, And I might have used it to describe it. But I at one point it was taking so long, we were waiting  for him to get ready, and there was one item of clothing that he was waiting for, and time was ticking away, and I got a little louder and a little more affirmative than I had been in dealing with him up till then.

Q. Did you yell at him? 

A. I raised my voice. I was a little firm.

Q. You were a little firm? 

A. Yeah.

Q. Ok. Was there anything you saw that afternoon before getting to the press conference that scared you in terms of Mr. Jackson ‘s condition, behavior? 

A. Yeah. Well, you know, the word ‘scary,’ in looking back at it, probably is an overreaction to what was going on that afternoon, the fact that we were late for the press conference. And, yeah, when you have a press conference to announce the comeback of the greatest star in the world, and he’s running two hours late, and he appeared to be somewhat hung over, yeah, I would say I’m not sure ‘scary’ looking back, if I’d use the word scary or really more concerned.

Q. And did you conclude, based on what you saw, that Mr. Jackson was an emotionally paralyzed mess? 

A. That was a description that I used to describe what I encountered, what my observation was.

Q. You know what I’m talking about; right? 

A. Yes.

Q. You send an e-mail to Mr. Leiweke? 

A. Yes.

Q. So you said in the e-mail he was drunk; you said in the deposition he was hung over; right? And now you’ve told us he was drunk; correct? Is that right, sir?

A. It’s not a “yes” or “no” answer.

Q. All right. Did you testify in…

A. Do you want the truth, or do you want what I testified?

Q. You want to ask me questions? I just played your testimony, sir, didn’t I?

A. Correct.

Q. Ok. Is that the truth, what you said in your testimony?

A. I was responding to what Dr. Tohme had told me, and I was relaying that message.

Q. Sir, were you telling the truth in the deposition that I just played?

A. To the best of my recollection, I was, yes, sir.

Q. So is it so the truth, were you telling the truth? “yes” or “no”?

A. Yes.

Q. Ok. Were you telling the truth in this e-mail?

A. The e-mail?

Q. “MJ is drunk and despondent.” Were you telling the truth to Mr. Leiweke when you wrote that? “yes” or “no”?

A. I was relaying what Dr. Tohme had told me.

Q. Do you say that Dr. Tohme told you that MJ is locked in his room drunk and despondent?

A. No, because these things everything was happening so fast, it’s all merged together in one e-mail.

Q. I see. I see. So, really, if you knew lawyers were going to ask you about this, you wouldn’t have wrote it this way; right? You would have written it differently?

A. No. At the time I didn’t have any time. I wrote it as fast as I could write it.

Q. All right, sir. And you must have yelled pretty loud or screamed pretty loud to make walls shake?

A. It’s an expression, exaggeration.

Q. Do you have a tendency to exaggerate, sir?

A. I knew you were going to ask that. No. No, I don’t.

Q. This is the only time you’ve ever exaggerated anything relating to Michael Jackson ?

A. No, no. Mr. Panish, in our lives, I’m sure we all exaggerate at times; ok?

Q. I asked you, sir.

A. Yes.

Q. You want to keep talking?

A. No. Well, actually, Mr. Panish, if you would allow me to, I would like to explain the circumstances of what was going on that afternoon.

Q. I’m getting to that right now.

A. Ok.

Before we reach the final scene there is one more detail worth mentioning. It turns out that Randy Phillips was spreading  lies about Michael being “drunk and despondent” among everyone around Michael thus creating the atmosphere of contempt, ridicule and unsafety for the man. He told his big story to everyone  – Gongaware,  a certain Loeffler, his partner in a different company, the transportation guys who were waiting for them downstairs,  “a few people in the company” – in short, to everyone in AEG who could only hear and listen.

By the way it was Loeffler that Randy Phillips put into Michael’s dressing room. Michael asked his friends what the man was doing in his room and was deeply distrustful of him:

Q. Did you tell anyone else besides your boss, Mr. Leiweke or, as you call him, your direct report that Mr. Jackson is a self-loathing, paralyzed mess?

A. I probably had a conversation with Paul Gongaware who was at the 02 at the time, where I may have used similar terms. I had an associate of mine who was downstairs getting the transportation ready. I may have said that to him. I’m you know, there were probably a few people in my company that I may have said that to.

Q. Ok. First of all, Mr. Loeffler, is he a friend of yours?

A. Loeffler.

Q. Is he a friend of yours?

A. As is Mr. Gongaware, yes.

Q. Does he go over to your home?

A. Does he go over to my home?

Q. Yes.

A. He has been to my home, yes.

Q. I mean, he was at your home does he live there at your home?

A. No. He lived in Utah with his wife and kids.

Q. Well, he was at your home the day that Michael Jackson died, wasn’t he?

A. No. We were… he was in my car. We were at the dry cleaners. We were on the way to the StaplesCenter.

Q. You still work together?

A. David and I? Yes.

Q. And you still have your management company?

A. Yes.

Q. And what is your management company called?

A. Phillips digital media.

Q. So in addition to being the CEO of AEG live, you have another job where you run a management company; is that right?

A. It’s a small management company, yes.

Q. Is Mr. Loeffler a partner with you in that business?

A. Yes, he is.

Q. Did Mr. Loeffler ever work on the “This Is It” tour?

A. He was with me in London during the press conference because he was producing he and I were both producing Lionel Richie’s European tour. So he was there with me then, so he was helping me out at the press conference. And then I asked him to do me a favor when we were in rehearsals the last two days, June 23rd and 24th, at the Staples center.

Q. Now, could you answer my question, please?

A. Yes, I did.

Q. Was Mr. Loeffler working for AEG live in conjunction with the “This Is It” tour?

A. No.

Q. So he wasn’t being paid?

A. No.

Q. And the favor was, you stationed him in Mr. Jackson ‘s dressing room for the last two days, correct?

A. I stationed him?

Q. Yeah. You had  him stand with Mr. Jackson ?

A. No.

Q. Did you ask Mr. Loeffler to go into Mr. Jackson ‘s dressing room the last two days?

A. No.

Q. Ok. And he wasn’t in Mr. Jackson ‘s dressing room, was he?

A. No, he was. I was I asked him to help

Q. There’s no question pending, sir.

A. No, I know. I know. But you want to color something that isn’t the

Mr. Panish: excuse me, your honor. He’s just talking.

Judge: give the full answer.

A. Ok. Mr. Loeffler, ok, was not stationed, the way you put it, in Mr. Jackson ‘s dressing room. Mr. Ortega, our director, asked me if I could get somebody to just ask Michael if he needed tea, water, food, things like that, because he had a staff of four bodyguards and an assistant, and no one seemed to care about what his needs were. So the person who was going to do that on the tour, Brigitte Segal, was in London scouting out houses for him for the 02 run. She was going to be back that week. I asked Dave to do that for me so – because Michael knew him, it was not a strange face; ok? And believe me, ok, he was not a spy. There was nothing in that dressing room I needed to know.

Q. Anything else you wanted to say, sir?

A. No. I’m glad I got a chance to say that. Thank you.

Q. You’re welcome. Brigitte Segal, was she overlooking housing for Conrad Murray, also?

A. No. I don’t know if Dr. Murray was going to stay in a hotel, he was going to stay at Michael ‘s house. I had no idea what arrangements were being made for him.

Q. Wait a minute. You don’t know that Brigitte Segal had been finding houses for Dr. Murray,sir? You never heard that?

A. No.

Q. You never heard that she showed Dr. Murray properties where he could live in London?

A. I know you think I am an omnipotent being in this job

Q. Excuse me. Just answer

Judge: he’s answering.

They go on talking in the same manner about Brigitte Segal securing housing for  Karen Faye, Alberto Alvarez, Conrad Murray, Michael Amir, Rosalyn Mohammed, Michael Bush, Frank & Miko. Let me remind you that AEG made Michael financially responsible for all these housing arrangements.

Now we are getting closer to the final and truly dramatic scene:

Q. Sir, you know what it means to sober someone up?

A. To sober someone up? I assume if they’re drunk, that means to get them sober.

Q. When they’re drunk, you try to sober them up; right?

A. Correct. That’s what I’m assuming it means, yes.

Q. Well, sir, you wouldn’t try to sober up someone who had a hangover, would you?

A. I don’t know. I don’t drink.

Q. Ok. Well, let’s see what you say about that. Let’s look at 93-1 again, in the bottom. And you told me that Dr. Tohme told you all this information about Mr. Jackson being drunk; correct?

A. Correct.

Q. But you and Dr. Tohme were trying to sober up Mr. Jackson , weren’t you?

A. What I told you, and what I testified to prior, is that this e-mail, it’s kind of compressed, the two events, that makes it sound like it’s all at the same time.

Q. Ok. Could you answer my question, please? Were you and Dr. Tohme trying to sober up Mr.Jackson ? “yes” or “no”?

A. Yes.

Q. Did you write that in this e-mail? “Tohme and I are trying to sober him up,” meaning MichaelJackson ?

A. And I used the word “sober.”

Mr. Panish: excuse me, your honor. Can he answer the question, please?

Judge: ok. Listen to the question, and answer. Your attorney will have an opportunity toask you questions to clarify something. I mean, if I don’t if you have an explanation, I want you to give an explanation.

Mr. Phillips: I understand.

Judge: focus on the question.

A. I understand. The answer is “yes.” The answer is “yes.”

Q. Now, let’s go back to exhibit no. 270 no. 2780, and let’s start at page 3,which I showed you earlier. You have it there in front of you. And this is with your colleague, I’ll call him, Loeffler. Did I get that right?

A. David Loeffler, yes.

Q. Mr. Loeffler?

A. My colleague.

Q. Is it fair to call him your colleague?

A. And friend, yes.

Q. And you’re telling Mr. Loeffler that you and Dr. Tohme threw Michael Jackson in a cold shower; right?

A. Correct.

Let me break his narrative once again. So Michael was not drunk and there was absolutely no need to “sober him up”, but nevertheless they put him under a cold shower and actually threw him there?

With what purpose I wonder? To show their power over him? To intimidate him? And does the fact that they thought that they were sobering him up but were mistaken in their assumptions make it any better?

If some people come to your place and throw you into a cold shower, what will be your actions, dear reader? A sheer stranger violates your privacy, touches you all over, drags you into the bathroom and throws you in your clothes into a cold shower? Or did they strip him naked before that? And will this version be any better if this is indeed what they did to Michael?

The first person to voice an opinion about this outrage was Phillips’s friend Loeffler. He replied to Phillips after reading his email – “your crazy”. However Phillips was evidently enjoying himself so much that upon seeing Loeffler’s reply he chose to correct his grammar – so this is how “nerve-stricken” he was:

Q. And then, go to the page before that so you and Mr. Loeffler were communicating back and forth, weren’t you?

A. By e-mail.

Q. Right. By e-mail. By Blackberry, actually. You had a Blackberry?

A. That’s correct.

Q. And then he tells you, you’re crazy; right?

A. I’m just looking for that in the e-mail.

Q. Yeah, sure. Just look at the screen. Maybe that will be better for you. He says, “your crazy.” look like he sent it from a Blackberry, too.

A. Yes.

Q. And then you two minutes later, approximately, three minutes, later you correct him; right? While you’re dealing with Mr. Jackson , who is drunk and despondent, you’re correcting Mr.Loeffler on his grammar; right?

A. It’s a habit I tend to have.

Q. But while all this was going on in a short period of time, and everything was jammed together, and you’re so busy, you’re correcting your friend on his grammar; correct?

A. That’s the role I play with most of my executives as a mentor, yes.

Q. Ok. Then by the way, did you hit Mr. Jackson?

Here it is. As if all that madness was not enough for us, now we learn that in addition to stripping Michael of all dignity and throwing him into a cold shower Randy Phillips actually HIT Michael.

Phillips wrote about it in an email because he wanted to inform the transportation guys how he finally managed to get Michael going. He was also giving them last minute instructions and said that he had “just slapped him”.

So Michael was taken from the shower, given some clothes and at this point he yelled at him so that the walls were shaking and then he slapped him too – evidently as the final argument in favor of going to the news conference?

To our amazement he admits that it was him who was creating the tension in that room. So it wasn’t Michael who was the problem but actually Randy Phillips was? So it was Randy Phillips who was an emotional mess full of arrogance and conceit?

Where are our media outlets with all their headlines? Why not say this for example: “AEG exec says he was an emotional mess” or “AEG exec slapped Michael  in a hysterical whim”?

Q. Ok. Then by the way, did you hit Mr. Jackson?

A. No.

Q. Ok. Well, let’s see what you said at the top of that page at 712/17. Why don’t you read what you said, sir?

A. This is in response to getting the transportation set up. I said:“you  guys are going to follow US behind a 12-passenger bus back there. I just slapped him and screamed at him louder than I did with Arthur Cassell.”

Q. Who is Arthur Cassell?

A. Arthur Cassell is one of the most annoying human beings on the face of the earth. He committed Lionel Richie to a date at a police department fundraiser for the LAPD, and Lionel never had agreed to do it, and I had to get him out of it. So on the phone with Mr. Cassell, I did actually scream loud enough to shake the wall, the glass walls of my office.

Q. But this time you screamed louder at Mr. Jackson , didn’t you?

A. Well, that’s what I wrote, but that’s not what I did.

Q. And you slapped Mr. Jackson , didn’t you?

A. You ever see a coach with a football team getting ready to leave; ok? And I created

Q. Sir, could you please answer my question? Did you write you just slapped Mr. Jackson ?

A. You want a “yes” or ”no” that doesn’t tell the story of what actually happened? What do you want?

Ok. When we were I know what you want.

Mr. Panish: your honor, could I ask him – I just asked him

Q. Did you write…

A. I’m going to answer.

Q. Did you write that you just slapped Mr. Jackson ? “yes” or “no”?

A. No.

Q. Ok. You didn’t write “I just slapped him”?

A. Yeah, I wrote that.

Q. Ok. A. But you want to know what happened?

Q. Sir, can you answer one at a time?

A. Ok. Yes, you’re right. You’re right.

Q. Ok. But that’s an exaggeration again; right?

A. No. I slapped him.

Q. But you slapped him, oh, like a nice slap, like, oh, come on, let’s go, and then you screamed. Louder than you did at Arthur Cassell; is that correct?

A. Here’s what I did; ok? This was a very tense situation. And, you know, frankly, I created the tension in that room; ok?

Q. Sir, IA. Because I was so nerve-racked, ok, the time slipping away, and his career slipping away; ok?

Mr. Panish: your honor, could he answer the question? And the question was – 

A. As to the slap. I’m going to get to it.

Judge: you know what? Only one person can talk at a time, so probably best if you can listen to the question and answer what is asked.

Q. Ok. Your lawyer, who you trust, will get to ask you whatever you want; ok?A. Ok.Q. Can you try to answer mine now? It’s my turn. I get to ask questions on behalf of my client;ok?A. Be my guest.Q. When you wrote “I just slapped him,” was that an exaggeration?

A. Nah. I slapped him on the butt.

Q. Ok. And when you screamed louder than you did at Arthur Cassell, and that time the windows shook in your office, was that another exaggeration?

A. At the time it was an exaggeration, yes.

Q. So that’s another exaggeration?

A. It was an exaggeration.

Q. Ok. Fair enough.

As regards Randy Phillips’ so-called exaggerations another one was told to Karen Faye when she shared with him her concerns about Michael Jackson’s health. Phillips’ words were full of contempt for Michael and  meant to show Karen that he was a good-for-nothing addict or alcoholic whose health did not even matter. His reply to Karen was that he had to ‘scrape him off the floor in his room”.

Now he says that he hears of it for the first time:

(a video clip was played with the following testimony being said:)

Q. Did you ever tell anybody that you scraped Mr. Jackson off the Floor in his hotel room in London before the press conference? 

A. Not to my knowledge.

Q. I’m sorry. When you say ‘not to my knowledge,’ is it your testimony that you don’t remember ever saying that, or is it your testimony that you did not say that? 

A. I don’t remember ever saying that.

Q. Ok. So it may have happened, it may not have happened. You’re not sure? 

A. I’m not sure.” 

So that press-conference was so precious to Phillips that for the sake of it he went as far as hitting Michael Jackson. But was that press-conference needed at all?

Absolutely not.

Four days after the conference Phillips’ friend wrote to him an email saying that by the time the press-conference was held half a million people had already registered for tickets so it looks like the press-conference did not matter. Surely Phillips was the first to know about it and now he says they could have simply released a press statement and that would be it.

Randy Phillips was stunned that they did not even have to make an effort to sell tickets (which was their only real obligation under the contract for which they charged Michael 10%) – all major media outlets came to them themselves, thousands registered for the tickets and all this was due to the magnetic power of the man whom he heavily undervalued and slapped four days ago:

Q. Ok. Do you have exhibit 102, sir?

A. Yes

Q. Are you involved in that e-mail chain?

A. Yes, I am.

Q. And this is from the C.O.O correct?

A. Correct.

Q.”Radio silent” means no communication?

A. Correct.

Q. And this is four days later?

A. Correct.

Q. You still in London now?

A. Yes.

Q. But you communicate by Blackberry; right?

A. Yes.

Q. And you say: “the press conference didn’t overwhelm me.” you don’t say that, he says that.

A. That’s correct.

Q.“I hear there are 450,000 registrants. So I guess the press conference didn’t really matter.” so he was not really impressed with the press conference; right?

A. No.

Q. Is that

A. That’s correct.

Q. Ok. So then you write back: “I don’t understand. 335 media outlets, front page in every major newspaper in the world, and the equivalent of over a million tickets sold in registrations….

Certainly Randy Phillips did not understand whom he had been slapping four days ago, otherwise he would not have done it.

A week  before the press-conference Gongaware said to Phillips that they could do a press-conference without Michael and was perfectly right in this statement.  But his email had one more crucial thing betraying AEG’s intentions – he said that if they sold tickets (with or without Michael?) Michael would be locked and would have not choice. Once the tickets were sold he would have to do the shows.

Doesn’t it perfectly explain why they set up 50 shows for him? They wanted to lock him and leave him no choice!

Randy Phillips’ deposition:

Q. Now, this is before the London press conference; right? This is February 27th, 

A. Yes.

Q. And the London press conference is March 5? 

A. Right.

Q. Mr. Gongaware wrote: ‘meanwhile, our play here is to not back off. We are holding all the risk. If MJ won’t approve it, we go without his approval.’  You see that? 

A. Correct.

Q. Did you agree with that tactic? 

A. Yeah. I’m not 100 percent sure what he was referring to.

Q. What do you believe he was referring to? 

A. That Michael was trying to back out of the press according to this, that he wasn’t going to get on the plane and go to London to do the press conference “and Paul ” that had been scheduled. ” and Paul recommended going ahead with the press conference and putting the tickets on sale, because ‘once we go on sale, which we have the right to do.

Q.  He is locked. He has no choice. He has to do it. Right?

 A. That’s what he wrote.

Q. Ok. Did you agree with that?

A No.

Q. Did you ever respond to this e-mail saying that you disagreed with it? A. “not that I remember.” 

Q. So Mr. Gongaware told you that: “if Michael doesn’t approve it, we go without his approval.” Correct?

A. The marketing collateral, yes.

Q. And he said: “once we go on sale, which we have the right to do, he is locked.” That meansMr. Jackson is locked in; right?A. That’s what he’s saying, yes.

Q. “and he has no choice. He has to do it.” Right?

A. That’s what Mr. Gongaware was saying, yes.

Q. And you never corrected those statements; correct?

A. I did to verbally to him, but not in e-mail.

Q. I’m sorry, sir?

A. I did verbally to him but not in e-mail.

Q. You didn’t respond to this and say, “don’t say that. We don’t want to pressure Mr. Jackson . He is not locked in.” you didn’t say that, did you?

A. That’s not my conversation with him.

Q. Did you write back to Mr. Gongaware and say, “Paul, hey, that’s not right. We don’t want to push him into this. We don’t need it’s not correct that there’s no time left to push this back”? Did you tell him that?

A. Well, we could have canceled the press conference we didn’t have to do a press conference.

Q. Did you write back and say, “Paul, we can back off now. It won’t be a disaster for us. There’s time left to push this back”? Did you write back and say that?

A. A. No. I had …

It’s not use reading it any further. We know well in advance what Randy Phillips’ answers will be like.

Of course they wanted to lock Michael and leave him no choice, and therefore set for him 50 dates! They knew he would have to do those shows after that!

In fact they never gave to him  any choice – from the very start of it. For Michael Jackson his cooperation with AEG started with no choice and a slap, and ended with no choice and a slap too, because all those AEG demands that he should rehearse were also a big slap in the face of Michael Jackson.

For his earlier tours he never rehearsed and did not understand why he could not decide for himself and had to waste all his remaining energy on those damned rehearsals. He had no such obligation to AEG and was not even obliged to explain himself to them.  And Phillips had no right to pressurize him – either at rehearsals or that useless press-conference, let alone use such arguments like throwing him into a cold shower, yelling at him or giving him a slap in the face. I wonder how Michael could bring himself to talk to Phillips after that at all.

All that cooperation with AEG was just ONE BIG SLAP in the face of Michael Jackson – from the very beginning of it to the very end.  How he managed to dance, sing and even occasionally smile after that is impossible to imagine. It makes you cry, scream, mourn in silence and then cry and scream about it again.

*  *  *

The full transcript of Phillips’ testimony on June 5, 2013 (before lunch break) is found here:


Filed under: AEG THE HORRIBLE, Jacksons vs. AEG Tagged: AEG, Michael Jackson, Randy Phillips, Tohme

AEG-Jackson trial Days 18 and 24. THE MYSTERY OF MICHAEL JACKSON’S CONTRACT

$
0
0

To be able to move further we need to look into the contracts and various papers made by AEG with Michael and his so-called managers – Tohme and Frank Dileo. These matters were discussed in detail with Shawn Trell, AEG’s Senior Vice-President, their General Counsel (top lawyer) assigned by AEG to represent the company as the person most knowledgeable about everything connected with the projected tour.

His job was to talk to everyone and review all documents related to it. But the problem the trial revealed was that his memory was extremely selective – he, for example, did not remember anything about the chain of emails captioned “Trouble at the front” which kept other AEG bosses sleepless half the night on June 20th, but on the other hand he remembered perfectly well that hired personnel like Karen Faye and Alif Sankey whom he hardly met did not approach any of the AEG bosses with complaints about Michael’s health – over here his memory was clear and he is absolutely sure of his testimony.

So whenever we look at Shawn Trell’s answers we should remember this strange peculiarity of his memory.

As regards Michael Jackson’s contract Trell remembers that he was involved in drafting the agreement together with Kathy (Kathy Jorrie) and that it was signed either on January 26 or on January 28 (yeeess, on these two dates). The drafting of the contract was described by Trell as follows:

Ms. Stebbins: Is it fair to say you drafted part of the agreement?    

A Yes. I mean, involved in the negotiation and drafting of the terms and conditions that ended up in that document, yes.                        

Q. Who else besides yourself was involved in the negotiation of the tour agreement?          

A Well, principally it was myself, Kathy and Randy Phillips was involved in those negotiations.          

Q. And “Kathy,” do you mean Ms. Jorrie?       

A Kathy Jorrie, sorry.                        

Q. And is that –who on the Mr. Jackson side?                    

A On the Jackson side of it, the people that were involved in drafting and negotiating that document were Dr. Tohme Tohme, his manager at the time, Dennis Hawk, his attorney at the time. There was another lawyer present when we signed the contract, another lawyer for Mr. Jackson, named Peter Lopez. I don’t know what his involvement was with Michael and/or Dennis. I didn’t have any direct negotiations with him about the matter, but he’s -­he’s now passed away, but he was a Well-known entertainment lawyer. He was present when we signed, and had    worked with Michael in the past, so –those would be the people I would say, yes.                   

Q. So who was Dennis hawk?         

A He was Mr. Jackson’s lawyer.    

Q. And I think you said Dr. Tohme was his manager at the time.      

A Correct.                        

Q. Mr. Hawk’s manager or Mr. Jackson’s?       

A Mr. Jackson’s manager.                

Q. Sorry.       

A Yes. Sorry.                   

Q. And how long did negotiations for the tour last?           

A They lasted a couple of months.                    

Q. And did Mr. Hawk and Dr. Tohme provide comments and edits to the draft agreements?                

A They did; and we had meetings, you know, where different aspects of the agreement were discussed and gone over, negotiated. There were drafts of that agreement, multiple drafts of that agreement that were exchanged.             

Q. So sounds like it was quite a process.           

A Sure.      

Q. Is that about the typical length of time it takes to come up with a Tour agreement for a Tour of this type, or was it longer and more complicated?        

A Well, some have taken shorter, some have taken longer. I don’t think a Couple of months is out of the ordinary, yeah.

At this point we learn that Michael Jackson had a similar offer from AEG’s competitor Live Nation and exactly at the same time, only the way Shawn Trell is describing it seems that Michael Jackson was not even informed about its existence as all negotiations were conducted with Tohme Tohme and his lawyer Dennis Hawk.

Q. Now, do you know whether Mr. Jackson, at the time he was negotiating with AEG. Live for the “This Is It” tour, was considering any other companies to promote his concerts?                 

A It’s my understanding they were also talking to or at least receiving offers from a competitor of ours called Live Nation.                        

Q. And what’s your basis for that understanding?              

A My basis for that understanding is we were at a meeting in mid-December at one juncture, “we” being myself, Randy Phillips, John Meglen –I think Paul Gongaware was on a –on the phone –on speakerphone –Dennis Hawk and Dr. Tohme. I was seated next to Dennis Hawk, and he had a document next to him that had three columns in it. One column was –it was various terms of the agreement, and then each of the other two columns were what we had offered and what live nation had offered.      

Q. So there was a column for Live Nation on this document you saw?                

A On the document I saw, yes.       

In a book by Sullivan Tohme Tohme said that he didn’t like them and drove them away:       

“Lopez first set up a meeting with Live Nation that left Tohme unimpressed. “I don’t like those guys,” he recalled telling Lopez, who then suggested AEG. Tohme claimed to be unaware of Michael’s previous meeting with Randy Phillips, who had never entirely given up on signing Michael to an AEG Live contract.”

Ms. Stebbins Bina showed Shawn Trell a copy of the agreement with Michael Jackson and Trell said that he saw Michael Jackson signing it in his presence:

Q. And is this a Tour agreement ultimately entered between AEG. Live and Mr. Jackson?                     

A Yes, it is.                       

Q. What were you checking for there?              

A The signatures.           

Q. Make sure it was the final agreement?        

A Right.        

Q. And did Mr. Jackson sign this agreement?                      

A Yes, he did.                  

Q. Were you present when Mr. Jackson signed it?              

A Yes, I was.                   

Q. Can you tell me about that?      

A About — the signing itself?           

Q. Yes.          

A Yes.  I went to the home on Carol wood, I walked in –security lets you behind the –the big gates, and then they let you in the front door. I walked in the front door, and I guess I had an experience I’ll probably never forget –I’ll certainly never forget. I mean, Michael Jackson doesn’t know me from a hole in the wall, doesn’t know my name, but got up from where he was seated, walked over, and said, Hi, welcome. I’m Michael,” which I thought was pretty funny, because he’s a very distinctive-looking guy, obviously.

And we shook hands; and he had a good, firm handshake; and his voice was not like most people, I think, associate his voice. Those are the things I remember from first walking in. We were in the room immediately to the left as you walked in, and seated there was Michael at the head of a long coffee table. Next to him was Paul Gongaware –to his left, Paul Gongaware, Randy Phillips, myself; and then to his right was Dr. Tohme, Dennis Hawk, and Peter Lopez.

Let me intervene for a second and quote the same point from Randy Phillips’s testimony which surprised me Mr. Panish’s question whether he was sure that Peter Lopez was present:

Q. Well, who was involved in the drafting for Michael Jackson on his side of this?

A. Dennis hawk and Peter Lopez

Q. Are you sure about that?

A. Oh, yes

Ms. Stebbins continues:     

Q. And Peter Lopez was another of Mr. Jackson’s attorneys, to your knowledge?
A To –that’s my understanding, yes.                 

Q. But you –if I understood you correctly a minute ago, you hadn’t interacted with him during the negotiation of the deal?
A No, I had not.           

Q. What was your impression –had you met Mr. Jackson before this meeting?                     

A No. This was the only time that I ever met him.             

Q. Had you ever been to his house before?    

A No.            

Q. What was your impression of Mr. Jackson?                   

A Well, like I said, I mean, he popped up, came over, introduced himself, was very cordial. There  was a real –a real positive energy and vibe in the room.        He seemed genuinely enthused, and we sat there for some  time and he had the -­the contract out in front of him, he said he had read every page, he was flipping through it, he was -­again, it just felt –he just seemed so enthused by the whole thing. We went through the process of signing it, and then we stayed for some period thereafter.

And, again, you know, his excitement was showing through, he was talking about the various production elements and things that he wanted in the -­in the show. I specifically remember –he was really keen on the 3d stuff, and there was going to be this really huge L.E.D. screen that was going to be the backdrop of the stage, and he was talking about the different 3d things that he was hoping to be able to produce, these vignettes and other things that you’ve probably heard referred to.      

He was already well down the road in his mind with what that was going to look like. Those are my recollections from –from being there. I was probably there for something close to an hour.     

Q. That’s about –that’s what I was going to ask, was how long did this last?      

A Ok. Yeah, I would say it was just a little less than an hour, probably, and –and then I left, and that was it. That was the only time I ever met him.  

MICHAEL’S CONTRACT REVISITED

Initially I thought that Ms. Stebbins and Shawn Trell were talking of the version of the contract different from ours but when she asked Shawn Trell why it was starting with Dear Dr. Tohme to my relief I realized that it was the same strange paper we have:

Q. Let’s look at the first paragraph. Explain to me why it starts off “dear Dr. Tohme.”

A. Well, he was handling the negotiations, principally, as Michael’s manager on behalf of the Michael Jackson company; and this document, this -­this particular tour agreement was in the form of a letter agreement.                     

No, I will not go into the specifics of that letter agreement as everything said about that “contract” before fully applies to it now and the only thing I will do here is make a short comment on the advance money and render a little help to Shawn Trell in recalling how they were to divide profit between Michael Jackson and AEG. This top lawyer of AEG got so confused over that point when explaining it to Ms. Stebbins that he will really need help:

Q. Under this agreement, how was Mr. Jackson to be compensated?                   

A. Under this agreement, this –the transaction was –I’ll refer to it as a 90/10 split.               

Q. And what does that mean?        

A That means that the artist receives 90 percent of what’s defined as contingent compensation, and the promoter would receive 10 percent of what’s defined as contingent compensation.                

A short note on the above: Randy Phillips said that for other stars their usual split is 95/5, but this time it was better for AEG. I wish he could explain why for Michael Jackson they set the terms worse than for other stars:

Phillips declines to release terms of the deal with Jackson, but he says it was better for AEG than the 95%-5% split most superstars receive.

http://www.thisisrnb.com/2009/07/aegs-ceo-randy-phillips-talks-michael-jackson-fallout/  

Ms. Stebbins continues:

Q. And looking at this paragraph 4.1, it talks about the contingent compensation. Let me try to find what I’m looking for so I can have pam highlight it. Here we go. Pam, in the middle of that paragraph, “within five business days.” what’s it mean, “subject to promoter’s right to recoup advances”?             

A That means that the promoter recoups any artist advances that are –that were previously made prior to the calculation of the 90/10 split.                     

Q. And in this document, this tour agreement, I see things referred to as artist advances and things referred to as production advances. Can you tell me what the difference is between those?                    

A Right. Well, the artist advances were the specific –specifically delineated advances that we made. You’ve heard about the –the rent for the  Carol wood house, there was another $5 million advance. There was the need to pay off a Settlement agreement that Mr. Jackson had with some sheik or something over in a London court. There was a piece of litigation they had -­ they had entered into, a settlement agreement, and the reason that was necessary to be paid off is because the underlying dispute there covered Mr. Jackson’s live performance rights, so the sheik or whoever that party was there –it’s called “two Sea’s records.” they had rights to Mr. Jackson’s live performances. So they had whatever dispute they had, they entered into whatever settlement agreement they entered into, and there was a $3 million payment contemplated there that needed to be made. So that was part of the advances. Those rights needed to be freed up. Mr. Jackson represents in this agreement that he’s has the authority and the power to enter into this; so having those rights freed was, you know, part and parcel of that.

Q. So artist advances were advances that didn’t necessarily relate to the tour, but you were giving to Mr. Jackson?
A Right And then the production costs are those costs associated with mounting the tour, as I described.
Q. And are both artist advances and production advances –are they both loans to Mr. Jackson?
A Yes.

Note: The advances paid to Michael Jackson were $5 mln out of which $3mln went into settlement of the claim from the “2 Seas records” and the remaining two million went to the account of the Michael Jackson Company to which Tohme had full access through his power of attorney. The $1,2mln for the Carol wood house was not cash money, was frozen in the bank and was to be paid to the owner of the house directly. And advances and production advances are absolutely different things.

Q. And under this agreement, does Mr. Jackson have to pay back both artist advances and production advances?
A Yes, he does.
Q. Now –it may be a question better asked for someone in the finance department, but Ms. Hollander testified I think on Friday, or it might have been on Monday –yesterday about if the show was not going forward, Mr. Jackson would owe back100 percent of the production advances; and if it did go forward, he would owe back 95 percent of the production advances. Can you explain what that means?
A Well, she’s –what she’s referring to there is the –the 5 percent producer fee at the point In time in which that producer fee is calculated.                       

Q. Can you explain that a Little bit?

A Well, the artist advance –the contingent compensation, you have all the revenues associated with the tour, and all of the expenses associated with the tour, you have –you get a –a Net –a Net number there. Right? From that net number, all the artist advances are recouped, and you get down to another number; and from that number, the production costs are –from that number, the production costs are -­are then recouped and –wait a Minute. I got to do the tree.

Artist advances are recouped, there’s then the 90/10 split, we then recoup the production advances. And I’m sorry. Now I’ve lost track of what the question was.

Note: No, he mixed everything up, so let me explain. 90/10 split means that as soon as all the money was collected AEG was to deduct 10% from the gross sum. This is the fee they got as the promoters. The biggest obligation of the promoters was to sell tickets which, as you remember was done within minutes. When the selling was over AEG was to get its hard-earned 10%.

This left Michael with the remaining 90% – but not quite. Out of that sum AEG wanted to recoup its $34 million spent on production and all advances they gave to the artist. A certain sum would be left after that. Out of that sum AEG was to get another 5% as a producer’s fee and the Artist was to receive the rest (if there is anything left there of course).

Trell seems to be admitting that at least 5% of production costs were to be covered by AEG. This is something new to me and it sounds like a big and generous present they were making to Michael Jackson:

Q. I think maybe this is a better question to ask of one of the financial folks; but I guess the idea is if the tour is a success, and you take the producer fee as well as the promoter fee, is the –that 5 percent of production costs accounted for in some way in terms of how AEG. Live collects its producer fee?         

A Right. Effectively we end up paying 5 percent of the –of those costs if the tour is a Success.            

Q. So as part of the producer fee, you basically give a discount on production costs –on the production advances payback rate?                        

A Right. That’s right.      

Q. I’m probably over simplifying, I’m just trying to make it make sense.            

A Right.        

Q. But either way, production costs – production advances and artist advances are both advances?

A Yes.          

Q. And they’re both things that Mr. Jackson is borrowing from AEG. Live and has to pay back?          

A That’s correct.             

Note: I wish they could show us a point in the contract which says an outrageus thing like that. Advances YES, production advances up to $7,5 mln YES – these were to be paid back, but as to the rest of the expenses – first of all, these were to be REQUESTED by the Artist’s company and second, all those excess expenses were to be AGREED UPON IN WRITING. Otherwise AEG could spend, spend, spend and Michael would pay, pay and pay. NO, first he was to agree and only then pay. However the problem is that these written agreements were MISSING.

Q. I’d like to turn to paragraph 8.2, which is on page dash 157.        

A 8-2.            

Q. Yes, 8.2. This is a Provision you were asked about yesterday about this $7.5 million cap. And I think, if I recall correctly, you testified yesterday that when this agreement was drafted, it contemplated that production costs would only go up to 7.5 million –or production advances would only go up to 7.5 million; is that right?              

A Right.        

Q. And then can you go down to the — sentence about two-thirds of the way down on the right-hand side, starts “artistco’s shall be responsible.” yes, that one, pam. She’s highlighted the full sentence.             Mr. Trell, what’s this sentence about?              

A This means that anything that may be over and above that 7 and a half million, Artistco is obligated to reimburse us for that. They’re defined as excess production costs.                        

Q. And these are the production costs that Mr. Jackson requested be added on top of the 8.5 million –7.5 million?                

A Well, the entire –again, what you see on the stage if you’re there at the concert, it’s the artist’s show. So, you know, the production elements and  what you see is all something the artist either, you know, has wanted to see come to fruition, you know, or that they’ve developed, and there’s costs associated with that. This particular project, you know, was very fluid. Michael Jackson was known to have very elaborate productions –production –what’s called production values. There was a lot on the stage. ..             

Q. Now, you testified yesterday, if I recall correctly, that the production costs for the “This Is It” tour –the production advances, I should say, exceeded 7.5 million ultimately?                   

A Right.        

Q. And I believe you also testified that you weren’t really familiar with the process by how Mr. Jackson was kept in the loop and how he approved these additional expenses; is that right?                  

A I’m not, no.                 

Q. But do you have any reason to believe that Mr. Jackson did not approve the additional advances?                  

Mr. Panish: there’s no foundation.                     

Judge: overruled.            

A.  No, I have no –I have no reason, you know, to believe that. It’s my understanding he was –I’m not even going to use the word “very,” I’m going to use the word “intimately” involved in the production process.    

Q. in your experience, when AEG. Live is producing a Tour or concert tour or something along those lines, does AEG. Live normally just advance money without the artist requesting it?           

A No.            

Q. Would that be uncommon, in your experience?            

A Yes.                           

Q. So would it be your assumption, at least, that if additional funds are advanced for the production of the tour, it’s usually because someone in the artist’s camp or the artist himself has requested that?                      

Mr. Panish: objection; leading and suggestive of the answer.             

Judge: overruled.            

Q. Yes, absolutely.

Note: Dear reader, now that you know that those excess production costs were to be paid only in case Michael requsted them and requested them in writing, will you ever believe that AEG naively paid all that money only because Michael just nodded his head and gave his verbal approval to it?

Does AEG produce on you the impression of people who will rush to fulfil every Michael’s whim just as soon as he expressed it? No, they don’t? Then what are we talking about here?  Of course they did not spend a single stingy dollar without having some sort of a guarantee that their spending would be fully recovered – in this or that way.

One of those ways could be getting Michael’s assets and in this case the more they spent the better it was, because the more difficult it would be for Michael to repay the costs.

Another way could actually have the same goal but only be done in a different manner – those written approvals could be made by someone in Michael’s “camp” in order to deepen Michael Jackson’s financial troubles and take advantage of them for their own neeeds.

Why have all of us turned our heads towards Dr. Tohme at this point? Is it because he was holding two general powers of attorney to act on Michael’s behalf? Yes, he was quite capable of a covert operation like that, however let us remember that by the time his powers of attorney were annulled (some time in April), AEG could not have yet spent all those $34 mln dollars. They had hardly started production by that moment yet, and this is probably why Michael was hurrying up to terminate Tohme – he knew Tohme’s fraudulent ways and was trying to safeguard himself against this person.

However even the formal absence of  the necessary credentials did not stop AEG or Tohme from making the respective papers shifting all that excess production cost onto Michael (after Michael’s death) and this is how the Estate ended up paying those sums all the same.

TOHME NOT THE REAL McCoy

When signing an agreement with Michael Jackson and a separate agreement with Tohme (for services to be rendered by him to the promoter, i.e. AEG)  Shawn Trell as the top lawyer of AEG Live knew perfectly well what kind of a guy they were entering into an agreement with.

An independent lawyer whom they hired for drafting all those agreements, Kathy Jorrie was warning them that Tohme was most probably not the real McCoy. She sent an email dated January 22, 2009 or approximately a week before signing a contract with Michael Jackson where she says she understands that AEG have checked him out (!) but she still has reservations about this person and suggests hiring a private investigator to check up on him:

Q.                And Ms. Jorrie is saying to you: while I understand you have checked up on the credentials and authenticity of Dr. Tohme through personal sources … Did I read that right, Sir?

A.                You read that correctly, yes.

Q.                So Mr. Phillips went out and checked … Or you. Was it you or Mr. Phillips that checked out Dr. Tohme through personal sources, credentials and authenticity? Was that you or Mr. Phillips that did that, Sir?

A.                It was not me. I don’t know to whom she’s referring.

…Q.                Ok, so let’s see what she told you about this Mr. … Dr. Tohme. Let’s look at the next sentence. I nonetheless have reservations about whether or not he is the real mccoy. Have you ever heard that, the real mccoy? You ever heard of that saying?

A.                I’ve heard it, yes.

Q.                That means whether someone is legit, not a fraud or a fake; right?

A.                Right. The real thing.

Q.                …Let’s look at the next sentence: when I checked a couple online search engines for Dr. Tohme to see if I could find references to him, the only thing I found were recent quotes from Dr. Tohme of Michael Jackson’s, quote, unquote, publicist, and some reference to him in various blogs by people who referred to him as a  mystery man who claims to represent Michael Jackson. Did I read that right, Sir?

Q.                And then it says: I found nothing else on him, almost like he never existed until he met Michael Jackson. It’s possible there are references to him on the internet in Arabic rather than English, which I didn’t check because I don’t read Arabic

Q.                Did I read that right? Correct. Nonetheless, I recommend that a  background check be performed through a  private investigator or, at a minimum, that someone at AEG Live meet with Michael Jackson to make sure he understands that we are entering into a tour agreement with him that will require him to perform a  worldwide tour. Did I read that right, Sir? That’s what it says. So she was telling you one thing to do is get a private investigator; right?

A.                She says that, yes.

Q.                You didn’t do that, did you?

A.                No.

What’s also interesting in Kathy Jorrie’s message is that 6 days before signing the contract Michael Jackson she wants to make sure that he understands that he is “entering into a tour agreement with AEG”. This strange reminder makes me think that AEG was doing business mostly with Tohme, and therefore Kathy Jorrie is not sure that Michael Jackson knows of the scope of his responsibilities under the documents they are preparing for him.

In fact Shawn Trell did earlier testify that all business was discussed between Randy Phillips and Tohme, and Tohme also confirmed it in his numerous media interviews – he was not interfering into what Michael was doing and Michael was not supposed to interfere into what Tohme was doing.

AEG signed with Tohme a production management agreement. Shawn Trell cannot explain in what capacity Tohme was acting there– it was neither an interdependent contractor, nor an employee, in short the top AEG lawayer simply does not know it.

He says that their agreement with Tohme was signed on the same day as the contract with Michael Jackson. Shawn Trell saw Michael putting his signature under Tohme’s contract, however all is not is clear on this horizon as it seems at first sight.

The dates of signing those contracts are shrouded in big mystery and from Mr. Panish’s questions it seems that he knows more than he is saying. The date is slippery and elusive as everything else in this strange business.

TWO DATES FOR ONE CONTRACT

First Shawn Trell says that Michael Jackson’s contract was signed on January 26th:

Q no.  Well, are you sure about that?  Because you testified about it 11 times so far.  Were you just estimating that, or did you say — and counsel asked you in the questions, “and it was January 26th when you signed, and it was January 26th –” you’re absolutely sure about that, aren’t you, sir?

A that’s my understanding

Then he says that Tohme’s contract was signed the same day and he actually saw Michael signing it:

Q. …I want to ask about another agreement that was entered at the same time as the tour agreement on January 26th, 2009.

A Ok.                            

Q. And that’s an agreement involving Dr. Tohme tohme.                                    

A Ok.          

A …This agreement was entered into on, you know, the date of the –well, it was actually signed on the 26th. It’s dated January 24th.


Q. Could we turn to the second page or the third page of this agreement? And there are three signatures here, Mr. Trell?
A Right.                        

Q. Whose signatures are they? A It’s Randy Phillips on behalf of AEG. Live, it’s Dr. Tohme Tohme on behalf of T.T. International, and it’s Michael Jackson on behalf of Michael Jackson.
Q. And did you see Mr. Jackson sign this document?
A It was signed on the date that I described earlier when the tour agreement was signed.
Q. So is that “yes”?

A “Yes.” I’m sorry. “yes.”
Q. No worries. So Mr. Jackson signed this agreement?
A Yes, he did.
             

But then we recall the email where Shawn Trell called Michael a “freak”. It was dated January 28 and said that Trell was going to the signing procedure on January 28th, 2009:

A okay  it was on the 28th

Q so as sure as you were, just like all your other testimony you were wrong about that weren’t you sir?

 A I was wrong about the signing date yes

 Q but you told us that 12 times under oath, didn’t you, sir?

 A I don’t recall how many times I referenced the 26th, but I referenced the date we signed the contract.

 Q ok and then it said… Well, you referenced it quite a bit today sir… And you just did when I questioned you.  So let’s talk about that January 28th, not the 26th right?

 A ok

 Q do you want to change your testimony under oath now about that, sir?

 A I didn’t have the date, necessarily, in my calendar.  It appears from the e-mails it was the 28th.[…] There was a document signing at the home.  It was on Wednesday the 28th, not Monday the 26th.

But on still another occasion Trell says that the tour agreement with Michael Jackson (same as the agreement with Tohme) was signed on January 26th:

Judge: remind me when it was signed?

Trell: It’s dated the 24th. It was signed on the 26th of January.

Judge: okay. I guess what I’m asking is, once they — assuming they got the insurance, would Tohme’s payment, assuming you would get paid, be all the way back to January 26th?

Trell: Right. I understand the question.

Judge: all right.

Trell: (reading docs)

Mr. Panish: What date — I’m sorry? it was signed? on 26th?

Trell: The date when the tour agreement was signed, the 26th.

Mr. Panish: 26th. Okay. Thank you.

Even from how long they are discussing it we understand that the point is of utmost importance:

Q and you told us all about your meeting with Michael Jackson yesterday didn’t you, sir?

A my meeting at the house when we signed the contract is the only time that I met him, yes

Q ok  so you only met Michael Jackson one time in your whole life right?

A that’s right

Q and the one time that you met Michael Jackson, I’ve heard it today at least ten times, was on January 26th, 2009, when the contract was

Signed… Isn’t that true sir?

A yes

Q and you’re as sure about that as all the testimony we heard for the last six hours from you, right?

A I’m sure the contract signing is the only time I met Michael Jackson

Q no sir, you told us ten times, and counsel had it in her questions, that on January 26th, 2009, you met Michael Jackson, and he signed all of those agreements.  You told us all about that, didn’t you, sir?

A that’s my recollection yes

Q and you told us you’re sure because you’ll never forget that moment right?

A I won’t forget meeting Michael Jackson

Q no. On January 26th, 2009, at the 100 Carolwood address in Beverly hills, California, correct?

A that’s where the meeting took place, yes

Q and you’re as sure about that, it occurred on January 26th, the day the contract was signed, as all the testimony you’ve given under oath in this court, isn’t that true sir?

A that’s the date I believe we signed the contract

Q no.  Well, are you sure about that?  Because you testified about it 11 times so far.  Were you just estimating that, or did you say — and counsel asked you in the questions, “and it was January 26th when you signed, and it was January 26th –” you’re absolutely sure about that, aren’t you, sir?

A that’s my understanding

Q okay.  Just as you are about everything else you’ve said in this case, right?

A yes.

I don’t want to steal the big surprise Brian Panish is preparing for the jury but will still say it as this is what I was actually suspecting for several years by now. Not only Tohme wasn’t real McCoy, but all the papers AEG had with Tohme and Michael Jackson in the first place are not the real McCoy either.

Let us put two and two together. Only recently Shawn Trell told us in that freakish email dated January 28th that he was on his way to meet Michael Jackson for signing the contract – therefore the signing was on January 28. This is when he saw Michael the first and the last time.

On the other hand the agreement with Tohme was signed on January 26th and he saw Michael signing it too. And this is again the first and the last time he saw Michael Jackson.

So Shawn Trell saw Michael only once but on two different occasions and each time signing important documents – on January 26 he saw him signing Tohme’s contract and on January 28 he saw him signing his own contract. And both of them were supposedly on one day as he met Michael Jackson only once.  And he is absolutely sure of it.

Who is the freak here I wonder? All right, let us reserve the ridicule for some other time and try to explain what it means instead. Indeed, how all this can be explained?

Easily. Trell is simply lying. But what is he trying to cover up?

What most probably happened is that Michael did not sign the papers on January 28 and that his meeting with the AEG bosses ended in an overall talk and a decision to sign the contract later when everything was settled and agreed upon. This never happened for some reason and in order to have at least something AEG used the two Michael’s signatures obtained from Michael on January 26th.

In which way were they obtained? Well, Tohme could easily ask Michael to sign a preliminary letter of intent sent to him (Tohme) which Michael and the AEG bosses was most probably to discuss on January 28. It was absolutely not definitive but they wanted to fix at least some of their preliminary agreements reached.

Do you remember the phrase with which that letter of January 26th was closing? It said:

·        “By signing below each party acknowledges its agreement be foregoing and agrees to negotiate the definitive agreement expeditiously and in good faith”.

Now this page is what the so-called final agreement with Michael Jackson is closing. Will you be interested to hear how the top lawyer of AEG is explaining why their final agreement is closing with this strange phrase? Here it is – Ms. Stebbins Bina is asking Trell about this discrepancy and this is the incredible answer he gives:

Q.  why don’t you read it.

A ok  ….By signing below, each party acknowledges its agreement to the foregoing and agrees to negotiate the definitive agreement expeditiously and in good faith.

Q was there another agreement that was going to be negotiated after this agreement between AEG live and Mr. Jackson?

A No this is another example of a holdover from a form, the last portion of that referencing a definitive agreement

Panish  I’m going to again object and move to strike as nonresponsive to this question, which was is this a definitive agreement, not what he said

Bina  your honor, I think the question was there an intention to do another agreement.

Panish  that wasn’t the question

Court  let’s strike the answer, go back and ask your question

Bina  sure

Q Mr. Trell was there going to be another agreement?  A definitive agreement after this one?

A No this agreement was the definitive agreement between the parties

Q Do you have an explanation for why this language would be here?

A Yes this started out as a smaller form summarizing terms and conditions  this last language is in that form where a separate, separately negotiated document is contemplated the original form just got expanded upon into the letter agreement format that this tour agreement ended up being in. And Kathy and myself, umm you know, didn’t catch that holdover language

Q You said holdover language?

A yes, holdover language from the form from which the agreement started

Q is this language supposed to be here?

Panish  objection leading suggestive

Court  overruled

A The sentence at top should just end after the word foregoing

Q so the rest of it?

A the balance of it is the holdover language that I would refer to.

So now the top AEG Live lawyer is telling us that the sentence was to be finished at the word “foregoing” and the rest was to be crossed out, but it was not done because he and Kathy “did not catch it”? Two top lawyers were reviewing the main document laying the basis for their cooperation with Michael Jackson and did not notice the crucial fact that it was not final? And they hope that we will believe this ridiculous explanation?

What is actually standing behind all this nonsense is that due to lack of the final contract with Michael Jackson AEG decided to meddle with the papers. In fact Shawn Trell is describing the method himself – they started with a smaller letter form summarizing the terms and conditions, then a separate document was ‘contemplated’, then they added this separate document to the original small summary keeping the “letter agreement format” and then they forgot to strike out the final sentence about the agreement being indefinite because ‘he and Kathy did not catch it’.

All of it is exactly what we expected it to be – it was a cut and paste job where they took the first and last pages of a letter of intent addressed to Dear Dr. Tohme which were absolutely priceless to them as they carried the date (January 26th) and signatures of Michael Jackson. Then they took away the inside pages and inserted instead a separate document which they ‘contemplated’ later and this combination of papers was passed by them for a final contract with Michael Jackson.

When that separate document was added only God knows – it could be two days later when Trell went to Michael’s home or many months later, when Michael died and they made this cut and paste job before submitting it to the Estate for their scrutiny. Why the Estate did not notice it or chose not to notice it is another matter which will surely be clarified during this trial. It would be indeed be interesting to know why.

WHO WAS TO PAY TOHME?

Under the agreement with Tohme he was to be paid $100,000 a month. Who was to pay is unclear as Michael’s contract said that Michael was not responsible for it and the expenses on Tohme were to be included in production costs. This in its turn made us (and Michael) think that production costs were not his responsibility.

Clause 6.8 of Michael Jackson’s contract says about it:

With the exception of the monthly fee owing under the terms of a separate agreement with TT International, LLC for the services of Dr. Tohme Tohme (not to exceed $100,000 per month), which shall be included in Production Costs, Artistco shall be solely responsible for and shall pay all costs associated with management and agency commissions of fees and legal fees of Artist and/or Artistco, if any;

As you know now AEG considers all production costs Michael’s responsibility and this makes Michael responsible for payment to Tohme too. Trell explains the mess with who was to pay whom in Tohme’s case by another of their mistakes. He and Kathy evidently “did not catch it” again.

Well, whatever it was Tohme was not paid. There was a certain condition for payment to Tohme (he was to earn his money from AEG, you know) – AEG was to pay only after Tohme obtained a non-appearance insurance for them. Michael Jackson submitted to the test, and passed it with flying colors as they say, but the problems with the records for 5 years was still unresolved and then they increased the number from 10 to 50 shows and this demanded doubling the insurance premium and the insurers asked for another, very thorough medical examination – in short a partial and unfinished non-appearance insurance policy was more or less ready by end of April only, but by then Tohme had already been fired by Michael and our poor old Tohme unpaid. Serves his right – he shouldn’t have increased the number of shows to 50, this only delayed the receipt of the insurance policy.

One of the many conclusions we can derive from the above is that Tohme was interested in presenting Michael as a very healthy man – obtaining the insurance was directly connected with the public statements he was making to the press and this is what the insurers were very much listening to.

Another conclusion is that all this time AEG most probably kept Tohme as a bulldog beside Michael to look at “what he was doing”. They suspected him of abusing substances and were most probably thinking of Demerol or other narcotics (which were absolutely not found in MJ’s system). It remains to be seen whether they knew of propofol but as regards narcotics this was surely on the minds of those AEG people.

 

REHEARSALS

 

The example of what was on Randy Phillips’s mind is his reaction to the email sent by Kenny Ortega on June 14th. Ortega informe Randy Phillips: “Were you aware that MJ’s doctor didn’t permit him to attend rehearsals yesterday?”and you know what Randy Phillips did in reply to that? You will never believe it – he wrote to Tohme an email about “intervention” and this intervention indeed took place on June 16th.

Now Phillips calls it a simple meeting about some “protein shakes” and similar innocent things.

Brian Panish produced the respective emails for both Ortega and Phillips’s approach to Tohme. You might have already guessed that the reason why Randy Phillips was summoning (?) Tohme was not his worries about Michael’s health – all he wanted of Tohme was to force force Michael to attend the rehearsals and make him “more focused” on them.

By the way if you still have any questions as to whether AEG had any right to force Michael into rehearsals here is Shawn Trell’s clear answer to it – NO, THEY DID NOT.

This was extensively discussed by Shawn Trell with Mr. Panish and Ms. Stebbins and over here the General Counsel of AEG surprised us by giving a clear and definitive reply. He said that how the artist is to prepare and whether he is to prepare at all is only the artist’s business and an artist rehearses only when an artists desires to rehearse:

Ms. Stebbins:  Does this agreement anywhere obligate Mr. Jackson to attend rehearsals to prepare for the show?                  

A No, no, no. There’s no reference to rehearsals in a -­in a Tour agreement. I mean, the –even the notion -­the notion of something like that would be offensive to an artist. I mean, it’s their craft, it’s what they do. They’re the artist, it’s their show, it’s their talent. No tour promoter or tour producer is dictating when somebody shows up. Of course, people associated with the show want to make sure it’s, you know, ready, and all of that; but there’s never a Provision in a Tour agreement dealing with rehearsal attendance.

Q. So an artist would be foolish not to rehearse, but they’re not contractually obligated to rehearse? Is that what you’re saying?                        

A Well, I mean, the artist’s reputation is at issue with its performance. You know, whether it’s an individual or a Group, it’s always their name and reputation at issue; so they always, you know, want to put on a First-class performance. How they prepare and whether they prepare, you know, that’s –that’s up to them.             
             

Panish:  Now, I want to now ask you about the rehearsals you can take that down that you talked about yesterday. You said that AEG Live could not make Michael Jackson go to rehearsals; right?

A. Yeah. I said that generally with respect to any artist; that an artist rehearses when an artist desires to rehearse.

Q. Is that a Yes, Sir?

A. Yes.

All this is very nice only the top lawyer of AEG Live totally overlooked that the CEO of the company was violating this beautiful principle right under his nose:

Q. Do you know whether Randy Phillips ever demanded that Dr. Murray be present at certain rehearsals?           

A I don’t recall if I’m aware of that.
Q. Do you know whether Randy Phillips ever demanded that Dr. Murray be in charge of getting Michael Jackson to rehearsal?
A I don’t recall.            
         

Q. Let’s put that up, Sir. Now, we just talked about rehearsals, and let’s see what Mr. Woolley, your authorized representative, was telling to the person trying to secure the insurance from Lloyds of London. And could you read for us, Sir… [..]

A. Changes are structural only. Kenny Ortega has responsibility only for the show content and structure, in consultation with MJ. Randy Phillips and Dr. Murray are responsible for MJ rehearsal and Attendance schedule.

Q. So Mr. Woolley is telling the insurance man that it’s Mr. Phillips and Dr. Murray that are going to be responsible for making sure MJ is at rehearsal and his attendance schedule; correct?

AEG Objection:. Misstates the document.

The Judge: overruled.

A.  Can I have the question again,

Q.  Let me … I’ll ask it again. Mr. Woolley, who is your authorized representative, formerly the C.F.O. of your company; right?

A. Correct.

Q.Telling the insurance man, who is a long-time friend of his; right?

A. Correct.

Q.That Mr. Ortega has responsibility for the show only; right?

A. Correct.

Q.And that Randy Phillips and Dr. Murray are responsible for rehearsal and attendance schedule for Michael Jackson; correct?

A. That’s what Timm Woolley says, yes.

Q.Ok, and did Mr. Woolley ever tell you that,

A.No.

Q.When you were investigating the relationship between Dr. Murray and AEG Live, did you ask Mr. Murray about Mr. Phillips or Dr. Murray being responsible to get MJ to rehearsal?

A. There was no need to. Mr. Woolley’s statement is inaccurate.

Q.Sir… The question is simple. Did you ever ask Mr. Woolley about that statement? Yes or no?

A. No.

Q.That would be another mistake by AEG; right?

A. Timm Woolley’s statement, in my opinion, is not accurate, Sir.

Q.But you never talked to him about it; right?

A. Right.

This is exactly what’s so bad about it – the top AEG Live lawyer never talked to any of them though he should have. Talking about it now is useless – it was then, when they were exploiting Michael and pushing him about that all these clear-cut statements were needed.

Q.Let’s go to the next sentence. Let me read that for you, Sir: looks like there might have been issue of KO. That’s Kenny Ortega; right?

A. That’s Kenny Ortega, yes.

Q.Not being demanding enough of MJ’s attendance or causing concern with the schedule he was imposing. Did I read it right; Sir?

A. Right. He being Kenny Ortega was imposing.            

Q. Right. And he wasn’t being demanding enough on MJ; right?

A. Meaning MJ showed up whenever MJ wanted to show                up.

Q.Sir. You’ve never seen this before, have you, Sir?

A. This email?

Q.Yeah.

A. No. I just testified that I had never seen it before.

Q.Right. And you never talked to Mr. Woolley or Mr. Taylor about what they were talking about; right?

A. Correct.

Q.And then it says: either way, there are others designated to ensure MJ is front and center for rehearsal. And those others, according to Mr. Woolley, were Randy Phillips, the C.E.O, and Dr. Conrad Murray; correct?

A. I don’t know who he’s referring to by the use of the word others. It would seem odd to be using it there, when the people are referenced in that incorrect statement in the preceding sentence, so …

Q.Well, Sir… He refers to Kenny Ortega being limited, because he’s not doing enough demanding; right? And either way, others … And the only others mentioned in that email are Phillips and Murray; right?

A. You’re asking me what I think he means by that. It would read awkwardly that he would be referring to the same people he’s referring to in the preceding sentence, so I don’t think that’s who he is referring to by that reference.

Q.Ok, fine.

All this evasive talk means only one thing – they were already playing tough love on Jackson by demanding that he should attend every rehearsal and not just sit there but perform, dance and sing and preferably going full out on his sing and dance routines.

Now Randy Phillips explains that this was needed for production and says he was so insistent due to Ortega’s complaints, but the above e-mail speak to the opposite – Ortega was not demanding enough by the AEG standards, they were dissatisfied with him and had a reserve variant – Randy Phillips and Conrad Murray, both of whom forced Michael to do what was not his obligation and only wasted his energy even before the show started.

Randy Phillips is an exceptionally hard-nosed, insolent and arrogant guy. Despite the overwhelming evidence about the opposite he still insists that Michael was obliged to rehearse. What’s interesting is that he says that he did not even read the contract and was familiar only with the summary of it. This I don’t believe for a second, but if it is true, it makes things only worse – he didn’t know what the contract was saying, did not bother to look it up but he nevertheless demanded of Michael what he had no right to?

Now he is shifting most of the blame for all that insistence onto Ortega:

Panish: As it got to June, it was extremely important that rehearsals are attended and done well by all individuals involved, correct?

A. Correct.

Q. That doesn’t exclude Michael Jackson, does it?

A. Well, no, it shouldn’t.

Q. All individuals are to be involved in rehearsals as it gets close to the time for the show to start. That’s extremely important, isn’t it, sir?

A. That is correct.

Q. And, sir, you started to see pressure in Mr. Ortega in June, didn’t you, sir?

A. When you say “pressure,” please define that for me.

Q. The pressure on Kenny Ortega and the entire production rises as you get closer to the show. Would you agree with that, sir?

A. Absolutely, yes.

Q. You’ve testified to that under oath, didn’t you, sir?

A. I’m sure I did.

Q. Is that a “yes”?

A. That’s a “yes.”

Q. OK. And the pressure you started seeing the pressure in Mr. Ortega in June, didn’t you, sir?

A. Towards the middle of June, yes.

Q. On?

A. Correct.

Q. And Mr. Ortega’s main concern was that Michael Jackson was not showing up at rehearsals,correct?

A. That is correct.

Q. And that Michael Jackson was not focused in mid to late June on the rehearsals, correct?

A. Correct. Just to correct your previous thing, Michael Jackson was showing up to rehearsals, just not enough of them, in Kenny’s in Kenny’s opinion.

Q. Was Kenny Ortega having concerns about Michael Jackson’s performance and him showing up to rehearsals, yes or no?

A. Yes, he was.

Let me remind everyone that according to Travis Payne’s testimony Michael Jackson missed 5 rehearsals at the most.

Q. OK. And, sir, isn’t it true that you had a phone call with Michael Amir about Mr. Jackson not coming to practice?

A. That is correct.

Q. And isn’t it true that you told Michael Amir it’s really critical that Michael show up for rehearsals because the show he is the fulcrum of the production and it really involves around him?

A. That is correct.

Q. Did you tell him that it’s not in his contract that he doesn’t need to go to rehearsal?

A. No.

Q. Did you ever tell anyone that Michael Jackson doesn’t need to go to rehearsal?

A. No.

Q. Did you tell Michael Amir so even though he, Michael Jackson, might know these dance moves, you know, intimately, and he’s just reinterpreting what he has done during his whole career, the entire show is a massive production, it really needs Michael’s presence because people have to key off him and they have to build the cues that affects everything off of Michael?

A. Yes, I ..I made that call at the behest of Kenny Ortega.

Q. Did you say those things

A. Yes.

Q. Kenny Ortega was very concerned that Michael Jackson was not coming to the rehearsal; and when he was coming to rehearsal, his performance was not good, correct?

A. Some of the rehearsals, yes.

Q. Now, sir, when Mr. Ortega brought this to your attention, you called Dr. Murray, didn’t you,sir?

A. Dr. I believe Dr. Murray called me, and I believe at the behest of Frank Dileo. I don’t – I don’t think I called him, he called me.

Q. OK. Well, let’s see what you testified to at the criminal trial, page 88 I’m sorry 8255, line26, to 8256, line 11. Did you tell the truth at the criminal trial, sir?

A. I always tell the truth.

Let me intervene for one more second. This was overlooked by us at Murray’s criminal trial but it seems that after Ortega’s email to Phillips on June 14th “Were you aware that MJ’s doctor didn’t permit him to attend rehearsals yesterday?” Phillips called Murray and spoke to him for about half an hour most probably explaining to him what he thought of Murray’s behavior.

This was when AEG began to exert pressure not only on Michael but on Murray too and this point is extremely important for this whole terrible case.  Up till June 14th Murray allowed himself frivolities like not allowing Michael to rehearse but after that it seems that he was wholly at AEG’s disposal.

From Panish’s questions we understand that Phillips called Murray not just once but several times after the news of Michael’s sick leave reached him. Now Phillips says that he does not remember the series of those calls and says he called Murray only on June 20th.

Discussing it was quite a battle:

Q. Let me ask you this. Did you have a call with Dr. Murray?

A. Yes.

Q. And how long was that call?

A. I know where you’re going with this. When I was asked at the deposition, I remembered it being shorter; but it was actually about 22 minutes.

Mr. Panish: your honor, could I ask that the witness please answer the question and not make comments like, “I know where you’re going with this, my answer before was this”?My question is asked here, “how long was the call with Dr. Murray.”

Judge: I’ve asked you to focus on the question. I’m sure you’re doing your best, but I think it’s important to try to focus. That way you’re answering the question that’s asked.

A. I understand.

…Q. Sir, how long was the call with Dr. Murray?

A. Probably around 25 minutes.

Q. You testified different to that under oath, didn’t you, sir?

A. Yes, I did.

Q. OK. And, sir, how many phone calls did you have with Dr. Murray?

A. Well, that was the one I remember having. I May have had one or two others. I don’t remember.

Q. So the answer to the question of how many calls you had with Dr. Murray is, “I don’t remember”?

A. Well, you actually subpoenaed my phone records; so you would know better than I would.

Mr. Panish: could he please answer the question, your honor?

Judge: I don’t I’ve asked him to focus.

Mr. Panish: well, you can instruct him to answer the question.

Judge: I’ve I know.

Mr. Panish: you are the judge.

Ms. Stebbins: your honor, I think the witness is trying to answer the question.

Mr. Panish: oh, come on. Your honor,  it’s pretty simple.

Q. How many calls did you have with Dr. Murray? One? Two? 1,000? “I don’t remember”?

A. The only one I remember is the one when he called me on June 20th; and it lasted about 20,25 minutes.

Q. OK. First of all, sir, how do you where do you get that information, that we subpoenaed your  phone records?

A. In the deposition. You guys showed me you showed me, when Mr. your co-counsel

Q. That was the Los Angeles police department that subpoenaed the phone records, wasn’t it, sir?

A. I have no idea. I thought you guys did.

Q. Well, no, no. You just said you didn’t say “I thought,” you just said I would know because I subpoenaed your phone records. Did you just testify to that?

A. It’s an assumption.

Q. OK. So you again testified to something that’s not true, correct?

A. Well, it’s better than you calling me a liar, so correct.

Q. OK. So now let’s go back to the question, sir. Was it one call only that you remember with Dr.Murray?

A. That’s the one I remember, yes.

After Michael’s sick leave on June 14th all AEG forces were thrown on making him come to rehearsals and one of the main tools was “bring Murray into the fold”. How did they do it?

When Kenny Ortega sent a couple of emails to AEG about the sick leave Murray allowed to Michael “Were you aware that it happened?”  ( June 14th) and “He is hurting and is not in great physical form” (June 15th) Randy Phillips’s reaction to them was a series of calls to Murray. We can only guess what he said to him over the phone.

Gongaware’s reaction was a message sent on June 14th saying that “He and Frank discussed it” (so Frank Dileo was in it too?) and they “wanted to remind Murray that it was AEG and not MJ who was paying his salary and wanted him to understand what was expected of him”.

Randy Phillips gave three different answers as to this  Gongaware’s email. First he said he didn’t receive it, then that he didn’t remember it and then he said he got it. He also does not remember whether he took part in a meeting that took place immediately after that – on June 16th.

Here is an excerpt from Phillips’ deposition:

Q. OK. Were you getting reports as of June 14, 2009, that Mr. Jackson was not performing well at rehearsals? 

A. No. I just the e-mail you’ve given me was the first time I was told that.

Q. Your first meeting with Dr. Murray, was that before June 14th, 2009? A. Yes.

Q. All right. And so that was at that time there was – you had no information about rehearsals, Mr. Jackson not performing well at rehearsals? 

A. No.

Q. OK. Mr. when Mr. Ortega writes here“he is not in great physical shape, I believe he is hurting, he has been slow at grabbing hold of the work,”as of June 15, 2009, did you get that same information? 

A. I don’t remember receiving this e-mail.

Q. Well, let me ask you about the the language there that Mr. Gongaware wrote at – on June 14th at 4:11.

“Frank and I have discussed it already, and have requested a face-to-face meeting with the doctor, hopefully Monday.”that would be June 15th, I think, if we do the calendar calculations.“we wanted to remind him that it is AEG, not MJ., who is paying his salary. We want him  to understand what is expected of him.”do you see that? 

A. Yeah, I see it, yes.

…Q. Did you ever admonish or correct Mr. Gongaware to say that that’s not accurate? 

A. No, because I don’t remember seeing it in the first place.

Q. Sir, first you never got it, “I don’t remember getting it,” “I got it,” right? Did I get that right,your three versions?A. Correct.

Ms. Stebbins: objection; misstates the deposition testimony.

Judge: overruled.

A.because that’s

Q. is that right, sir?

A. Because I was c.c.’d on an e-mail that Paul forwarded to Frank Dileo.

Q. Did I get it right, the three versions you testified to, sir?

A. Yes, Mr. Panish, you did.

Q. Now, you don’t remember doing anything in response to that e-mail, do you, sir?

A. Frankly, I don’t remember reading Paul’s e-mail. I was more focused on Kenny’s e-mails.

Then Panish explains to Phillips that Kenny’s new and totally panicky emails were sent only 5 days later, in the early hours of June 20th and reminds him that he did take action after Murray’s sick leave for Michael Jackson. Randy Phillips arranged a meeting which he called “intervention”:

Q. Did you participate in a meeting with Dr. Murray after June 14th, 2009, but before the meeting at the forum the next weekend? 

A. I don’t remember.

Q. So you may have had a meeting you may have already participated in a meeting with Dr. Murray around June 15th? 

A. I May have. I don’t remember.

The information about the meeting that followed was extracted from Phillips by Brian Panish in an exceptionally professional way. Confronted with Panish’s questions Phillips finally had to admit that there was a meeting in the middle of June (the one he called an intervention).

THREE MEETINGS

 

As we know the person whom Phillips contacted about the intervention was no other but Tohme and this is evidently how and when Tohme reappeared on stage again.  He personally did not take part in the meeting but was most probably the one who consulted them on how to deal with Michael.

The meeting was arranged on June 16th and this was probably when the tough love and now-or-never card were played on Michael. Murray was reprimanded for his frivolities, was fully “brought into the fold” to ensure that Michael comes to every rehearsal and was instructed to play tough love on Michael – no more sick leaves and no more sympathy for Michael’s health problems.

In Randy Phillips’ opinion this system of repression against Michael Jackson worked – he said that after that Michael began attending rehearsals.

Indeed Michael came to the rehearsal on June 18th and Karen described Michael on that day as “stoic”, but on June 19th the situation turned catastrophic which is why Kenny Ortega sent Michael home and this was followed by a serious of SOS emails from Bugzee and Kenny Ortega.

So in June 2009 AEG arranged three meetings for Michael and all of them had a repressive tinge to them – the first was around June 5th to reprimand him for not attending rehearsals at the Forum for three days or so (he had been making videos at the Culvar studios and this was not to AEG’s liking).

The next one was on June 16th which was a “tough love” intervention meeting arranged because after intensive rehearsing for a week after June 6 Murray had the cheek to allow Michael a sick leave on June 14th.

And the final meeting was on June 20th where Murray famously declared to Ortega to leave Michael’s health to him and not to play amateur psychiatrists here. He behaved in a manner which reminds us of Randy Phillips ways and  this makes us think that this is who Murray was drawing inspiration from.

All these meetings were instigated by AEG and were pressing on Michael to rehearse, do as he is told and behave himself following the rules set for him by his masters, sorry, partners.

Q. Sir, I asked you very clearly did you do anything in response to this e-mail [June 14th], and you said, “no, because I was more concerned with Kenny’s e-mail.” do you remember that testimony?

A. Yes, yes.

…Q. So you couldn’t have been concerned about Kenny’s e-mails on the 18th on the 14th, 15th,16th or 17th because he hadn’t even written them yet, correct?

A. Those e-mails, yes.

Q. Did you ever have a meeting where you discussed this e-mail with Dr. Murray?

A. That’s where there’s some confusion, Mr. Panish. There was I believe there was a meeting on June 16th, and but there’s some confusion as to whether the meeting was on the 16th or was earlier.

Q. OK. So now this is another meeting that you didn’t tell me about earlier with Dr. Murray, right?

A. No. That’s the meeting, the first meeting.

Q. OK. The first meeting that you said was in late May or early June is now on the 16th?

A. I said either either early June or mid June.

Q. But in your deposition, you said it was in late May or early June, didn’t you, sir?

A. I made a mistake.

Q. You didn’t correct that, did you, sir?

A. No, no.

Q. And so you’re now saying that the meet- now you remember the specific day of the meeting that was either in late May, early June, mid June now you remember specifically it was June16th; is that right?

A. Only because there were e-mails that make it make it appear that there was a meeting on the16th.

Q. So now is it the truth that you met with Dr. Murray on June 16th?

A. I believe so. I believe so.

Q. Did you put that in any of your changes of your deposition?

A. No.

Q. Did you testify to that in the deposition?

A. No, I ..I a mistake on the period, the week.

Q. I’m sorry. That was another mistake you made?

A. There were a few, yes.

Q. Sir, what’s an intervention?

A. What is an intervention? It depends on what you’re referring to.

Q. OK. What I‘d like to know is what is you your, Randy Phillips’, CEO of AEG Live’s understanding of what an intervention is?

A. In this case, it was to or just in general?

Q. Let’s go in general, sir.

A. OK. An intervention can be when there’s something going wrong in a project, you intervene the parties to figure it out and how to correct it.

Q. OK. So as far as you’re – intervention doesn’t have anything to do with somebody using substances?

A. It has been used in that regard. That’s not how I used it, but it has been used in that regard.

Q. Well, sir, there was an intervention with Michael Jackson in June of 2009, wasn’t there, sir?

A. An intervention? There was a meeting that I called an intervention, yes

Q. Sir, was there an intervention with Michael Jackson in June of 2009?

A. Yes; and it wasn’t drug related.

Q. Is that a “yes,” sir?

A. That’s a “yes,” sir.

Q. OK. Now, sir, let me show you exhibit 274. Did you write that e-mail, sir?

A. Yes.

Q. Do you remember writing it, sir?

A. Somewhat, yes.

Q. Did you review it in preparation to come testify here today, sir?

A. Yes, I did.

Q. So let’s put it up. And who are you writing this e-mail to?

A. This is to Dr. Tohme.

Q. OK. Was Dr. Tohme at the intervention?

A. At the meeting, no.

Q. OK. Well, did you call this a meeting or an intervention?

A. Well, I called it I mean, I, obviously, misspelled it; but I called it an intervention.

Mr. Panish: I thought you were so careful about grammar and punctuation.

Ms. Stebbins: objection; argumentative.

Judge: sustained.

Mr. Panish: withdraw the question.

Q. Sir, did you call this a meeting or a intervention?

A. I called it an intervention, but it was not drug-related.

Q.“intervenion” is what you called it, right?

A. Yeah, I made a typo.

Q. OK. Typo. And Kenny Ortega, Gongaware, Dileo and Conrad Murray from Vegas were all present at the intervention, right?

A. Correct.

Q. And you were trying to get Michael to focus and come to rehearsals, right?

A. Correct.

Q. And this intervention was on June 16th, right?

A. I believe I believe so, yes, based on these e-mails.

Q. Well, if we’re to believe what you wrote here, it would be June 16th, right?

A. The answer is yes.

Q. And you say, sir well, why don’t you read what I’ve written or what I’ve what’s been yellowed out.

A.“Kenny Ortega, Gongaware, Dileo, his doctor  named Conrad from Vegas, and I have an intervention with him to get him to focus and come to rehearsals yesterday. Getting him fully engaged is difficult and the most pressing  matter as we are only 20 days out from the first show.”

Q. How many days was that before Michael Jackson died that you had the intervention?

A. The meeting was on the 16th.

Q. Well, you called it an intervention, didn’t you, sir? That’s not my word, that’s yours, isn’t it?

A. No, I understand; but it was a meeting.

Q. Well, sir, Dr. Tohme, are you friends with him?

A. Am I friends with him. I became friendly with him as we progressed in negotiating the deal todo “This Is It.”

Q. Was he ever fired by Mr. Jackson?

A. You’re going to hate this, but it’s just not a yes or no answer, because

Q. Let me ask you this.

A. The answer is yes, but he kept in contact with him.

Q. OK. Well, the answer is was he ever fired? That’s a yes or no, isn’t it? Was he fired or not fired? What is it?

A. For with Michael Jackson, his advisors, you needed a scorecard. But yes, at one point, he was fired; but we received a a letter signed by Michael terminating him.

Q. So, sir, my question was, I thought, simple. Was he ever terminated by Mr. Jackson? Can you answer that yes or no?

Ms. Stebbins: objection; asked and answered.

A. yes.

Judge: overruled.

A. we received a letter terminating him.

Q. is that a “yes”?A. That’s a “yes.”

And this brings us back to Tohme again. For what reason they brought Tohme back into the fold we don’t know yet but the fact that they re-approached him at this stage looks somewhat disturbing. Did they want some special bulldog advice from Tohme on how to handle Michael? Or did they need him for some any other purposes? This will be hopefully clarified later – at this stage we are only learning more and more interesting details about Tohme’s role in the game all these people were playing against Michael Jackson.

 

TOHME FINAL SERVICES

 

First of all we find that when Randy Phillips met Tohme to negotiate their deal with Michael Jackson he knew that he was working as a consultant for Colony Capital. So just as we expected Tohme did work for Colony Capital when he was supposed to work as Michael’s manager and look after his best interests. And he wanted a huge per cent from Michael just for doing the work for Tom Barrack who was paying him anyway? No, all this is incredible stuff…

Q. OK. And so, sir, you were introduced to Dr. Tohme when?

A. In either probably in September, whenever I had the Colony Capital meeting, it was right after that.

Q. OK. What kind of doctor is this gentleman?

A. Not one I’ve used, so I have no idea.

Q. Is he a doctor?

A. He could be a PHD. I don’t know.

Q. Do you know if he’s anything, or he just uses that title?

A. I don’t know.

Q. Did you ever ask him if he was a doctor?

A. No.

Q. How many times have you met with Dr. Tohme?

A. Probably, over the course of the “This Is It” project probably met with him 25 times.

 

Q. Well, now, sir, the way that you came about meeting Mr… Dr…., whatever, Tohme was through this Mr. Nanula, who Dr. Tohme had worked with at Colony Capital as a longtime consultant, correct?

A. That is my understanding, yes.

Q. And did you know anything about Dr. Tohme before you before the Michael Jackson agreement was signed?

A. Before January 28th?

Q.   Y  es.

A. Did I know anything about him?

Q.   Yes.

A. Not nothing other than he was a consultant to Colony Capital, and he also represented Michael Jackson.

Q. And you learned that at this meeting at Colony Capital, right?

A. That’s correct.

From Shawn Trell we also learn that after Michael’s death they had a special role for Tohme to play – he was to make a certain declaration (in addition to the one by Frank Dileo) that Michael agreed to pay all production costs which AEG estimated at $34 million – those with which this post started with.

Though knowing full well that Tohme was no Michael’s representative and could not sign any papers on behalf of the Michael Jackson Company, AEG nevertheless arranged a paper from Tohme which said that he had the right to make all those statements. Shawn Trell pretends that Tohme returned to work for Michael in some capacity:

Q   your understanding, if I understood your testimony, was that Dr. Murray….Dr. Tohme had been terminated by Mr. Jackson at some point in early May 2009?

A right

Q and did you ever have an understanding as to whether Mr. Jackson and Dr. Tohme’s relationship changed again?

A yes it was my understanding Dr. Tohme came back into representing him in some capacity.

As I understand it after Michael’s death Tohme presented them with some papers saying he was the officer of MJ company (which is impossible as the powers of attorney were revoked and Tohme had long been fired from all posts even if he had them before). These fictional papers were used by AEG to have a document from Tohme consenting on behalf of Michael Jackson company that it was Michael’s ardent desire to pay all those millions for producing the show and maintaining all its tour personnel.

Why wasn’t the resulting paper disputed by the Estate I do not know and think that its attorneys owe us some explanation about it. All that ‘acknowledgement of the expenses’ on the part of the Michael Jackson company from a man who was not its officer for a single day while Michael was alive and suddenly became one after he had died looks to me very strange indeed.

Even the judge said that all those statements from Tohme were only his belief:

Q. Right, just like you had Dr. Tohme sign off on behalf of Mr. Jackson, right?

A. Correct.

Q. And Dr. Tohme approved the payment and submitted it to the estate, right?

A. Yes.

…Q in this document, it says that Dr. Tohme Tohme is an officer of the Michael Jackson company?

A yes

Q did you believe that to be true at the time this document was entered into?

A yes

Q and as you sit here today, do you have any knowledge as to whether it was true or not true, other than what was in the document?

A no I have no knowledge of whether it was true or not true

Q and it says here in paragraph 3 the undersigned, Dr. Tohme Tohme, represents and warrants that he is an officer of artistco; is that right?

A yes

Q did Mr. Tohme sign this document?

A Dr. Tohme signed it on behalf of the Michael Jackson company yes

Q okay.  Now, what was the purpose of this — let me ask, were you involved in drafting this document?

A yes

Q and what was its purpose?

A its purpose was to obtain Dr. Tohme’s acknowledgment of the production costs incurred to date as Dr. Tohme for some period of time at the beginning and then there at the end was representing Michael Jackson in some capacity.

Panish  move to strike.  There’s no foundation about the end.

Court  there’s no foundation –

Panish  no foundation for this witness.

Bina  your honor, I asked why he created the document and what its purpose was.

Panish  then it’s nonresponsive.

Court  motion denied.  That’s his belief

Q  did you — was Dr. Tohme the only manager that Mr. Jackson had in this time period?

A no from the time period that we entered into the tour agreements through June 25th, or the — you know, the date of — of this, June 28th, or whenever, there were two people that were there that represented Michael Jackson in some management capacity, Dr. Tohme and frank Dileo.

Q and did AEG live have any similar for this one with Dr. Tohme?

A we did a similar document with Mr. Dileo where he signed a declaration with respect to the same budget production costs that were attached to this document.

Q and do you know what became of these documents?  Were they were provided to any of  Mr. Jackson’s other representatives?

A they were provided to the estate.

Q and what was the purpose in providing them to the estate, if you know?

A it was just covering the time period at issue through both gentlemen.  Ultimately the estate conducted its own audit and investigation of the — and review of the production costs, and confirmed the same.

Q and were the production costs — production advances ultimately approved by Mr. Jackson’s estate?

A yes, they were

How the Estate made their audit and “investigation” of it I don’t know, but as to Frank Dileo it seems that we finally know why he agreed to sign off anything that was submitted to him by AEG.  But first a word about what Dileo signed.

 

FRANK DILEO FINAL SERVICES

 

It seems that Frank signed everything that was physically possible to sign for AEG:

Q. Is this the statement of Mr. Dileo that you were talking about?

A. Yes, it is.

Q. And you testified earlier that Mr. Jackson had two managers over this time period.

A. Yes, Dr. Tohme Tohme initially…. Mr. Dileo then came into the picture or Michael’s life in some capacity.  Then it was my understanding Dr. Tohme Tohme later came back into Michael’s life in some capacity.

Q. And in this first paragraph, does Mr. Dileo represent how long he was engaged as Mr. Jackson’s manager?

A. From approximately march until the date of Mr. Jackson’s death.

Q. And does he say anything in this document about whether or not he was involved with Mr. Jackson in preparing for the This Is it tour?

A. He says a lot of things here; but he says he had regular contact directly with Michael Jackson about matters related to the concerts at the 02 arena and the preparation for such concerts.

Q. Can we go down to paragraph 4, does it say whether Mr. Jackson… whether Mr. Dileo worked with Mr. Jackson to approve the budget?

A. Yes.

Q. The first sentence of that paragraph reads, Michael Jackson not only approved the attached budget of expenses, and he requested AEG Live to incur such costs to produce the type of show that Michael Jackson said he wanted. And is that consistent with your understanding?

A. Absolutely.

Q. Does this paragraph say anything about the retention of Dr. Murray?

A. Yes, it does, about right at the middle of the paragraph, the sentence that starts with, throughout…

Q. What does it say?

A. Mr. Dileo says, throughout the process of producing the show, Michael Jackson had many requests of AEG Live, and he acknowledged that he would be responsible for the costs associated with such requests. For instance, Michael Jackson asked AEG Live, as the producer of the show, to retain the services of Dr. Conrad Murray, who Michael said was his personal physician.

Q. And can you go down to the bottom of that page…did Mr. Dileo sign this document?

A. Mr. Dileo, under a paragraph that reads, I have personal knowledge of the facts stated herein, and if required to do so, I would and could testify competently to the same.  I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of California, the United States of America, and any other applicable laws, that the foregoing is true and correct.  Executed this 13th day of July, 2009, in Los Angeles, California, Frank Dileo.

Q. Mr. Trell, what was your understanding of Mr. Dileo’s role in this time period?

A. That he was acting in a management capacity with or some capacity in connection with the overall management of Michael Jackson.

Q. Did anyone connected with Mr. Jackson ever tell you, as an officer of AEG Live, that Mr. Jackson had not approved any of the costs for the This Is It tour?

A. No

Well, despite them saying that Michael had two managers at the time the reality was that Michael had none. Tohme working for AEG was fired in April 2009 and Dileo working for I don’t who was most probably shut off from any real decision making. AEG themselves were complaining that (now that Tohme was gone) there was no one to deal with.

Panish produced a respective email from Randy Phillips where he wrote to a certain Jeff Wald that it was a nightmare for poor AEG to work in such conditions – Michael Jackson had no lawyer, no business manager and no real manager:

Q. Mr. Trell, have you ever seen that e-mail before, sir?                       

A  I saw it at my deposition.            

Q. Ok. And are you claiming that’s not an AEG document?                                

A  I didn’t claim that. You asked me if I had seen it before. I saw it at my deposition.         

Q. I get ya I’m just saying would you agree                      that’s an AEG document?                               

A  Yes.                          

Q. And who is Jeff Wald?                                

A I don’t know.               

Q. Who is Phillips?                         

A  That’s Randy Phillips                   

Q. Ok. And as the person most knowledgeable about the relationship between Mr. Jackson and AEG. Live, does this document discuss whether or not Mr. -­Mr. Jackson had a Manager at that time?             

Ms. Stebbins: I’m going to object to the use of this document with this witness. I think it lacks foundation. I also don’t believe that was one of the designated person-most-knowledgeable categories.            

Judge: I’m confused as to your discussion. What is it discussed –did he discuss it with somebody? Did he –and you’re not talking about the e-mail, you’re just talking about the subject of whether he had a Manager?   

Mr. Panish: let me back up.             

Judge: rephrase that.    

Mr. Panish: I would be happy to, your honor.                    

Q. So it’s your –you’ve never seen –or strike that. Can you talk about this e-mail, sir?         

A I have no idea who Jeff Wald is or the exchange that took place here. I did not have any discussions with anybody about this exchange.                        

Q. Ok. Did Mr. Phillips, to your knowledge, ever tell anyone that Mr. Jackson had no lawyer, no business manager, and no real manager, and it was a real nightmare for AEG., to your knowledge?                        

A According to this e-mail here, that’s what  he says, yes.            

By the way when Randy Phillips was complaining about having no lawyer on MJ’s side he was right – Tohme was gone and Dennis Hawk was gone together with him as he was Tohme’s lawyer, and not Michael’s, and the only other lawyer left was Joel Katz but there was a conflict of interests as regards him  – he had been retained by AEG and was a long-time friend of Randy Phillips.

Panish spoke to Shawn Trell about it and this is only one instance of that talk:

Q. Did you tell us that Mr. Katz was an attorney for Mr. Jackson, Sir?

A. That was my understanding.

Q. Sir… Mr. Katz was on retainer for AEG at this time, wasn’t he?

A. Not to my knowledge.

Q. Would you agree with me there was conflict of interest for an attorney to be hired and on retainer for one person and then represent another person that’s in an adverse business relationship?

A. Yes.

As to Frank Dileo he as Michael’s manager was not taken seriously even by AEG and therefore could not be playing any important role in AEG’s business with Michael Jackson – and this means that he most probably never discussed with Michael (or AEG) any important points about the budget. He preferred not to be involved. We remember that after Michael’s death he gave interviews complaining of his poor health, and the way he nearly lost his eye-sight, and that by the time he joined Michael all decisions had already been taken, and actually he was almost openly admitting that he did not really look.

So any papers signed by Frank Dileo are of highly dubious character, especially if we consider the bomb broken by Panish at the very end of Shawn Trell’s testimony – he asked him if he was aware of the $5 mln. payment planned to be made to Frank Dileo.

Trell was devastated. First he didn’t know what Panish was talking about, and after being presented with an email addressed to him and telling him that the sum was approved and all they needed was an explanation why it was to be paid, he finally recalled that they did pay to Dileo but only $50,000 and only in connection with the This Is It movie project:

Q. Were you aware that after Michael Jackson died, AEG Live paid Frank Dileo $5 million?

A. No, I’m not aware.

Q. Ok, did you approve Mr. Dileo to get paid money after Michael Jackson died, Sir?

A. Not that I recall.

Q. Ok  well, let’s take a look, Sir and that’s something you would recall if you were approving sums of money to be paid to Mr. Dileo; isn’t that true, Sir?

A. Sums of money… you’re talking about $5 million?

Q. Let’s start with any money, Sir.

A. Don’t recall any money being…me being involved in approving the payment of any money to Frank Dileo.

Q. Well, let’s first talk about did you know that AEG paid money to Frank Dileo after Michael Jackson died, yes or no?

A. No.

Q. This is an e-mail to you, and this is on the fourth page. Do you see that, Sir?

A. Right here.

Q. Shawn Trell, is that you?

A. Yes, I’m on this string, so…

Q. Ok so, let’s put that up first.  Let’s start with that. Actually, it’s a whole long string, let’s start there. Can you read it now?

A. Yes.

Q. Seen that before, is your name on there, Sir… Shawn Trell?

A. On these two.

Q. Let’s put these first two up. Actually, you’re on the first three, at least.  Because you’re on this one, too, right?  One, two, three … Ok so here’s one that says, forward Frank Dileo expenses revised, right…that’s sent to you?

A. Right, in October.

Q. Two months after Michael Jackson died … Or, actually, four months, right?

A. Four months, yes.

Q. And then it says, approved 5 million bucket, right?

A. Yes.

Q. And then it says, above that, someone needs to generate a check request with a full explanation of what this payment is for.  Randy and Shawn can sign off, and it can be charged to additional motion picture expenses.

A. Yes

Q. Do you see that?

A. That’s an e-mail from Rick Webking to me, right.

Let me intervene into this for a second. So not only was the sum of $5mln approved for Frank Dileo but after that they also asked for someone to generate a check request explaining this payment!

It means that first AEG agreed to pay and then started thinking how to explain it and under what pretext the money could be charged to the additional motion picture expenses. I think that this request is even more mind-boggling than the sum they were planning to pay!

After seeing that email Trell finally began to recall things:

Q. Did you sign off and approve any expenses for Mr. Dileo to be paid after Mr. Jackson died, yes or no?

A. This looks like a $50,000 payment was made to Frank Dileo in connection with the motion picture.

Q. Ok well, let’s start with that. So after Mr. Dileo signed exhibit … Let’s put that up now … I’m going to be all messed up here, but … What would that be called… after Mr. Jackson died, after you got Mr. Dileo to sign, then AEG paid money to Mr. Dileo, right?

A. Correct

Q. Did you go to Mr. Dileo … AEG Live, and get him to sign this document?

A. Yes

Q. Can we put that up, Sir… I believe Frank volunteered to sign it, and if he didn’t sign, he wouldn’t get paid any money by AEG, would he, Sir?

A. No, I don’t think that’s the case.

Q. Ok Sir, is Mr. Dileo’s money included in what was submitted … Did AEG submit this, Sir?

A. Well, if I have an opportunity to answer this question fully…

Judge: Ok, answer it fully. 

A. The $50,000 payment to Frank would have had to do with something, it’s not clear to me, related to the motion picture.  And the reference to the $5 million bucket is an agreement as between AEG and the estate regarding additional motion picture expense … Like a contingency. You know, we had a bucket to deal with additional expenses incurred as the film was produced, so that’s … When it says $5 million bucket, it means it’s to be accounted for in that bucket.  It does not mean Frank was paid $5 million.

However Randy Phillips said that the sum of  $50,000 was paid to Frank Dileo while Michael was still alive, at Michael’s request and sometime at the beginning of May too, so that sum could never have anything to do with making a motion picture which they said they decided to make only after Michael’s death.

If those $5 million were indeed mentioned in connection with Frank Dileo’s name and had to be explained by attaching them to the motion picture expenses (though Dileo had nothing to do with the film) this will be the most incriminating evidence against Frank Dileo that can be only be thought of – but I am still making some reservations about it as we still need to see what information his computer will produce for us. The other fact which is restraining me from making final conclusions is the fact that Dileo died as a result of a coma which was induced by an accidental double doze of anesthesia.

Though previously Randy Phillips complained about a “nightmare” situation with Michael having no manager, no lawyer, etc. now he is presenting Dileo as real Michael Jackson’s manager – evidently to give more force to the paper Frank Dileo signed for AEG:

Q. I want to ask you this, sir. Let’s isn’t it true, sir, that when Dr. Murray was hired, there was noone acting as Mr. Jackson’s personal manager?

A. No, that’s not true. Frank Dileo was hired in some capacity. I don’t know if Michael referred to him as his manager or not, but Frank Dileo was representing him.

Q. Did Michael Jackson have a personal manager or not?

A. My understanding is that Frank Dileo was functioning in that role.

Q. OK. And do you have a writing that said, ”this is my agent”?

A. Yes.

Q. OK. What did it say?

A. It said it was when we advanced Frank Dileo I believe $50,000 at Michael’s direction.

Q. You gave Mr. Dileo Mr. Dileo, did he have a contract with AEG?

A. No.

Q. Never?

A. Not that I am aware of.

Q. Well, sir, and AEG Gave money to Mr. Dileo; is that right?

A. At Michael Jackson’s direction, yes.

Q. OK. And when was that, sir?

A. Most likely it was sometime in either May or June.

Q. OK. Well, let me show you, sir, exhibit 185, dash, 1.Have you seen that before?

A. I probably have.Q. OK. And when was Mr. Dileo what’s the date of that, sir?A. Monday, May 11th.Q. And did you pay 50,000 to Mr. Dileo after May 11th?

A. Hold on. This letter is dated May 2nd, 2009. The cover letter from Evvy Tavasci to PaulGongaware was on the 11th, and the actual document that Michael signed was on the second.

Out of all the mess with the two managers for Michael Jackson out of which none was a real one, one more thing is clear – the papers they gave to AEG were to mask the fact that Michael did not give any written approval to spending all that excess money on production. He either did not know that it was his obligation (we remember that the inside papers were inserted into the contract later) or he never agreed to cover those expenses.

This is why AEG was desperately needed the services of those two managers. They gave their written consent to covering the production expenses, and they were indeed covered by the Estate on the basis of papers submitted by Tohme and Frank Dileo. 

Tohme did it on behalf of the Michael Jackson Company though he was never its officer (and AEG knew about it), and Frank Dileo confirmed it as a manager whose credentials even AEG had a difficulty to accept and believe in.

Why was AEG so desperate to have those papers? Could they do without them? I doubt they could – their own contract explicitly said that all approvals were to be made in writing and from Michael Jackson they had absolutely nothing:

Q. Mr. Dileo, who you say was authorized to approve things … You say he was authorized by Michael Jackson to approve things, right?

A. That was my understanding.

Q. And he approved the Dr. Murray expense, didn’t he, Sir?

A. If this was contained in the attachment at this time, that’s what Frank was signing off on behalf of Michael Jackson.

Q. Right, just like you had Dr. Tohme sign off on behalf of Mr. Jackson, right?

A. Correct.

Q. And Dr. Tohme approved the payment and submitted it to the estate, right?

A. Yes.

Q. And, Sir… under Mr. Jackson’s contract, which I hate to do this … Let me just try to do it without showing it. Ok now, in this part of the contract, it says all notices … Does it say … Does it say some notices, ones that are verbal, does it ever say that, Sir?

A. No, it doesn’t.

Q. All notices, approvals and consent required or permitted to be given hereunder or which are given with respect to this agreement shall be in writing, did I read that correctly, Sir?

A. Yes.

Q. And Mr. Jackson, he was the sole officer of the Michael Jackson Company, correct?

A. That was my understanding as of the date this agreement was entered into.

Q. And you told us that there was a verbal agreement to extend it to 50 shows, right?

A. Yes, there was a mutual understanding to go to 50, yes.

Q. And the contract requires any notice or approvals or consents to be in writing, correct?

A. That’s what this provision says, yes.

Q. And, Sir… for Mr. Jackson’s expenses and production, you had Mr. Tohme and Mr. Dileo sign after Mr. Jackson was dead, right?

A. Right.

Q. And you had no signature before Mr. Jackson was dead, did you?

A. That’s correct.

Q. And, Sir … So AEG took the position that somebody could sign that was authorized by Mr. Jackson after the fact, correct?

A. We took the position that his management could sign on his behalf in that regard, all of it rendered moot by the estate ultimately signing off on it anyway. The estate is Michael Jackson, so I’m not sure I understand your question.

Q. Because you don’t want to answer it.  I know… let me say it again.

A. I am answering it.

Q. Isn’t it true that AEG took the position to satisfy the contract that Dileo and Tohme could sign after Mr. Jackson was dead, yes or no?

A. Yes, they signed off on it.

Q. And isn’t it true that Tohme and Dileo signed off on Dr. Murray after Mr. Jackson was dead?

A. It was included in that version of the expenses at that time, yes.

Q. And they got paid, Dileo and Tohme, after they signed to submit the … The documents, correct?

A. I’m not aware of any payments to Dr. Tohme; and I’m only aware of this $50,000 payment to Frank in connection with the film, as I just described.

So from Michael Jackson himself AEG had no papers – neither for 50 shows, nor for covering the production expenses. In fact I am not even sure that AEG had a proper contract with Michael Jackson at all as the dates of its “signing” are indeed raising too many red flags.

By the way when Ms. Stebbins asked the top lawyer of AEG whether there would be an agreement with Michael Jackson if he walked away from the room without signing it and the top AEG lawyer answered that there would be no contract with him, she was probably right.

Most probably Michael did indeed walk out of that room without signing, and all the fuss AEG arranged with the papers with Tohme and Frank Dileo was meant to close the huge gaps they were having after doing all their cut-and-paste job and reshuffling the only papers they had.

The fact that neither of the AEG people can properly explain a simple thing like when their contract with Michael Jackson was signed probably means that Michael did not sign it – and if he did not sign it means that there was no contract as Shawn Trell himself explained it to his lawyer:

Ms. Stebbins. When did you have a contract with Mr. Jackson?

A. As of January 28th

Q. And if Mr. Jackson had walked into the room on January 28th, 2009, and said, you know what, I changed my mind.  I’m not signing this…would you have had an agreement?

A. No

 

 

 


Filed under: BRIDGE To Understanding Michael, Did Michael want to go white?, Jacksons vs. AEG Tagged: AEG, Death of Michael Jackson, Frank Dileo, Michael Jackson, Randy Phillips, Shawn Trell, Tohme

The Mirror lies about Michael Jackson. Can a LAUGH at them do what a complaint can’t?

$
0
0

At first I didn’t want to speak about your press. By now I have formed a certain opinion about it but was keeping it to myself thinking that any judgment on my part would be unethical as the media in my place isn’t much better. However now that so much dirt is being poured on Michael Jackson and everyone is gazing in astonishment at this outrage and no one is able to do anything about it, it is a case when it is impossible to keep silent.

A shot from the Starsuckers documentary: "I love it for my own interest" (a reporter for the People)

A shot from the Starsuckers documentary: “I love  stuff like this just for my own interest”  says a reporter for the People.

The fraudulent publications about Michael appear as a matter of routine every Sunday and drag his name through the mud in the most shameful and blatant manner possible.

First it was Wade Robson’s sudden recovery from amnesia (his lies were the real reason that brought Paris Jackson to a suicide attempt as she couldn’t understand how he could do it to her father),  then came an astronomical number of “victims” no one has ever heard of, then they mentioned some fictitious millions allegedly used to silence those non-existent victims, and their latest lie is that all this crap is based on some “fbi files” which all of us have been searching forever since but could not find as it is impossible to find what is simply not there.

The Mirror latest crap

The latest crap from the Mirror

All the parties concerned except the most naive know that this is a deliberate slander campaign to distract us from the AEG trial and degrade the man who was innocent inside out, but no one can do anything about it – it is freedom of speech you know, so while the dog is barking the media caravan is going on, stamping out the truth and spitting on anyone who says that it is improper and indecent thing to do.

I hear that Taj Jackson, Michael Jackson’s nephew has recently complained to the British Press Complaints Commission about the terrible lies told about his uncle in the UK press.

It is worth trying of course, though the information I’ve learned about this PCC thing doesn’t sound too encouraging. First of all I’ve been to their site and their page on “How to make a complaint” openly says that they don’t deal in matters of “taste and decency”.

Sunday Mirror "The minimum we are going to pay is ..."

The Sunday Mirror “The minimum we are going to pay is about three …”

Evidently these days no one remembers what decency is as it is even listed by PCC as something arbitrary – in the category of “taste”, so let me remind them that the most indecent thing for the press is to tell LIES and once they cope with this problem all the rest of it will be relatively easy to decide.

Let me also remind them that the stories of certain LeMarques about Jackson, Macaulay Culkin and other youngsters rehashed now by the UK press are proven lies and this was determined already at the 2005 trial, so printing these lies now as some newly found “fbi files” is the biggest indecency ever possible.

Press Complaints CommissionHowever though this Michael Jackson matter is exceptionally easy to decide I wouldn’t be so hopeful of the fair decision on the part of the Press Complaints Commission, and the reason for it are the revelations about PCC made by tabloid journalists themselves.

According to a smashing documentary called “The Starsuckers” made by some honest journalists in the UK, PCC is a sheer fraud for the simple minds. Or a sham and a joke as the author of the documentary put it.

The maker of the film Chris Atkins says:

  • ‘We are led to believe that editors are awake at night terrified of the PCC”, and that “the embarrassment, the shame of the PCC complaint is something they will take to their grave. This is how it is presented to us and Parliament.”
Chris Atkins, the maker of the documentary: "It's a sham. It's a joke"

Chris Atkins, the maker of the documentary: “Self-regulation of the press does not work.  It’s a sham. It’s a joke”

But then he says what the tabloid people frankly told him about this PCC:  

  • “The reaction of the journalist of the Sunday People was the exact opposite. So self-regulation of the press does not work. It never worked. It’s a sham. It’s a joke.”

The reporter the author of the documentary is referring to is a lovely girl working for the People tabloid who frankly talked to the author about the way they brush aside PCC. And judging by what the rest of the tabloids do it is their common opinion about this organization.

The episode where she talks about the PCC is actually the funniest in those parts of the documentary which are available on YouTube now.

It all started with the author feeding three tabloids some totally fictitious stories about certain celebrities and their cosmetic procedures. Though such intrusion into private life is not allowed by PCC and their Code of Practice, the three tabloids out of four didn’t hesitate to break these regulations as they can’t care less about what the commission thinks, says or does about their activities.

"Ten Grand"

“You could be looking at up to ten grand”

The author of the documentary was even offered a reward for his revelations – up to 10 grand from the Sunday People, for example – but no money was taken as a matter of principle.

The tabloids had to pay their price though as the author of the documentary video recorded their discussions. When watching them now you realize that there is no better way to deal with tabloids than record them and then show to the general public what they themselves say about their “news” and especially about the formidable Press Complaints Commission they are supposed to be so afraid of.

Chris Atkins says: “I wanted them to talk, and oh boy, they did talk!”

Here is one of their videos from Youtube:

I will limit myself to only one episode from this video.

Getting PCC is not great, but…

Getting PCC is not great, but…

Now this reporter is surely no longer working for the paper, but she can comfort herself by the fame she is enjoying through all these revelations and the publicity she is getting this way.

The girl is truly a star reporter.

This is what she says about the Press Complaints Commission:

Getting PCC is not great, but…

A lot of papers just brush it aside.

A lot of papers just brush it aside.

A lot of papers just brush it aside.

All it is just a little apology somewhere in the paper.

You get a slap on the wrist.

All it is just a little apology somewhere in the paper

All it is just a little apology somewhere in the paper

You get reported by PCC…

But there is no money!

You get a slap on the wrist

You get a slap on the wrist

Yeah, it’s a really odd situation…

You get reported by PCC…

You get reported by PCC…

And the PCC is run by the newspapers editors…

But there is no money!

But there is no money!

Yeah, it’s like a self-regulating thing…

And the PCC is run by the newspapers editors…

And the PCC is run by the newspapers editors…

It’s really odd, but…

Yeah, it’s like a self-regulating thing…

Yeah, it’s like a self-regulating thing…

The wide smile on her face and a good laugh over that odd PCC thing at the end of the story is probably the most precious part in all her revelations.

So the way the tabloid girl explains it to us, the Press Complaint Commission is run by editors of the very newspapers whose publications we are complaining about.

In other words, when the Sunday Mirror and Daily Mail lie like crazy about Michael Jackson, we need to complain about their lies to the editors of these very papers and their colleagues, with whom they are most probably great pals after all that sitting together in one commission.

Even if PCC agrees that the so-called “fbi files” are the totally fictitious horror stories made by some crooks, the only punishment the paper will get will be a slap on their wrist.

And all that will be required of them after that will be a tiny apology saying that there were some “inaccuracies” in the several months of slander and dirt against Michael Jackson.

If readers notice this apology “somewhere in the paper” it will leave them forever guessing what was a lie and what was the truth in the pile of crap they have already consumed.

But in most cases no one will notice anything at all – same as no one noticed a tiny announcement in the USA Today saying that there was no match between Jordan Chandler’s description and Michael’s private parts which modestly appeared the next day after all of them went into a frenzy with their front page stories over the news of the settlement.

The most important thing we’ve learned from our star reporter is that there is no money to lose for the tabloids even if the most outrageous lies are told, and that money is all these people care for.

Matters like decency have long ceased to bother these guys, so once the wrists are slapped the lying machine will cynically start anew and all this will be done in the name of the freedom of press of course.

British humor, you know.

*  *  *

SUPPLEMENT

In the supplement you will find a little more information about the Mirror Trinity Group which includes the Mirror, People and the rest of the 107 papers run by this big media group in the UK as well as some ideas from the authors of the Starsuckers documentary on how to deal with these monsters.

  • The Sunday Mirror is the Sunday sister paper of the Daily Mirror. Their weekly circulation is around 1,846,000. The Mirror papers are part of the Trinity Mirror group which also includes The People (who we are familiar with through that talkative reporter). The circulation of the People newspaper is roughly 700,000.
  • The Trinity Mirror group prides itself on the quality of their news: “Whether via page or screen, our audiences get the trusted, reliable news service they have come to expect.”
  • They also say that they  have “an award winning portfolio of newspapers, websites and digital products” and are “one of the UK’s largest multimedia companies employing over 5000 people across more than 60 locations around the country.” They are indeed a big media group which includes the following national and local newspapers:

National:

  • The Daily Mirror / The Sunday Mirror
  • Daily Record / Sunday Mail
  • The People

Trinity MirrorLocal, regional, Scottish:

  • Accrington Observer
  • Anfield & Walton Star
  • Barking & Dagenham Yellow Advertiser
  • Bexley Mercury
  • Birmingham Post / Birmingham Mail / Sunday Mercury
  • Bootle Times
  • Bracknell Standard
  • Brent & Wembley Leader
  • Buckinghamshire Examiner / Buckinghamshire Advertiser
  • Chester Chronicle

and all the rest of the 107 papers listed on Wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Trinity_Mirror_titles

You will probably be interested to see the people who bring all this splendid news to millions of people in the UK. Here are the members of the Trinity Mirror board:

Trinity Mirror board members

Trinity Mirror board members

Trinity Mirror board members (continued)

Trinity Mirror board members

Incidentally, when I was also looking at the members of the Press Complaints Commission I found that one of its seventeen members is a certain Tina Weaver, who worked as as Deputy Editor of the Daily Mirror in  1997–2001 and then was Editor of the Sunday Mirror in 2001–2012. Her successor in the Sunday Mirror now is Lloyd Embley.

So PCC always had the editor of these Mirror tabloids on its board…. In March 2013 Tina Weawer had to step down from the PCC. What happened I don’ t know but the official PCC text mysteriously states that she will not consider the complaints from the publci “while the inquiries continue”. So someone is inquiring into the activities of this lady? Interesting…

And here is what the Starsuckers’ authors have to say about the tabloids, the way they obtain their information and the true value of their so-called news. The authors actually suggest going on to fool the tabloids and it is only the need to lie about celebrities which makes me doubt their method –  but otherwise the tabloids operational process described by the authors makes a hilarious read.

If we know more about how they do it, their stories will automatically become worthless, and a good laugh at their ways will probably be the best outcome as no one will take them seriously any longer. Everyone will take them for what they really are – a place where each can sell the product of their own invention and where people are competing with each other for money in their humor, imagination or nastiness.

Here is the story from those who really know - http://www.starsuckersmovie.com/how-to/:

We spent several weeks cooking up and then selling fake celebrity stories to the British Tabloids, and we were shocked at how terrifyingly easy it was. We were offered some decent sums for this, but we couldn’t take any money it would compromise our ethics… but there is nothing to stop YOU from getting rich out of this. This simple guide will have you fleecing money out of the British Tabloids in no time.

Background:

The society of professional journalists has a few things to say on the subject of journalistic ethics:

  • The duty of the journalist is to … seek truth and provide a fair and comprehensive account of events and issues.
  • Conscientious journalists strive to serve the public with thoroughness and honesty. Professional integrity is the cornerstone of a journalist’s credibility.

Journalists should:

  1. Test the accuracy of information from all sources and exercise care to avoid inadvertent error. Deliberate distortion is never permissible.
  2. Identify sources whenever feasible. The public is entitled to as much information as possible on sources’ reliability.
  3. Always question sources’ motives before promising anonymity. Clarify conditions attached to any promise made in exchange for information. Keep promises.

Sadly these ethics seem as archaic as a guide to sending a telegram. The rampant commercialisation of the newspaper industry has meant that tabloid newspapers will pretty much print anything as long as it sells papers and gets clicks on their website. And as celebrity stories make the most money, these are the ones that are most likely to be drivel.

How Tabloids Print Lies.

  1. Dodgy leads. All tabloid newspapers pay money to sources once the stories get published. In the world of celebrity gossip this is guaranteed to encourage people to cook up stories to make a few quid. If you saw the drummer from McFly getting out of a cab and walking into a restaurant, and called The Sun newsdesk this is hardly going to hit the front page. If, on the other hand, you told them that he was wearing a pink Tutu and singing “She’ll be Coming Round the Mountain”, they would pay for you to dine at the Ritz.
  2. Bad checks. Journalists know (or should know) that paid sources are prone to gild the lilly with their stories to push up the price. The celebrity world is riddled with flakes, bullshitters, alcoholics, layabouts, coke heads, speed freaks, acid baskets and – worst of all – PR’s. The basic fee for a celebrity tip in a nightclub is £50, which is co-incidentally the going rate for a gram of cocaine. Celebrity journalists know this more than anyone, so they are supposed to check the veracity of their sources before they print anything. So if you had tried to flog a paper your McFly drummer story, it would be extremely simple for the newspaper to check it out by calling up McFly’s PR’s: “Hello, this is The Sun newsdesk. We’re looking at a story about your client skipping out of a black cab in a pink tutu singing show tunes… what? He’s in Paris? Oh, right, sorry to disturb.” Simple. But in reality this often doesn’t happen as the journalists are too overworked to perform this basic check, or they couldn’t care less.
  3. Exaggeration. The journalist has the story, but there’s another celebrity tutu story running that day. So the journalist adds their own spice and the headline becomes “Drummer from McFly gets out of taxi naked singing Nazi showtunes”.
  4. Churnalism. A phrase coined by Nick Davis (author of Flat Earth News) that neatly sums up how most modern journalism now works. Once our McFly story goes onto the wesbite of that particular Tabloid, it is instantly read online by journalists working for all the other tabloids, broadsheets, newswires, gossip magazines, blogs and BBC News. All of which are massively under resourced and over worked and are working to insane deadlines, so they all immediately grab the story, add their own little bit of spice, and run it as though they broke the story themselves. The result is that the lie gets mutated and amplified all over the world in minutes.

How to sell a fake story

Ingenuity and improvisation are the keys to succeeding at this and we would very much appreciate any feedback from both successful and unsuccessful attempts, so we can update these tips. But the very basic rules are:

  1. Be funny. Humour is a far more valued commodity to a tabloid journalist than the truth, so the more they laugh the less they check.
  2. Don’t be nasty. The more unpleasant the story, the more likely the celeb is to get angry and reach for their lawyer. This is not about libelling celebrities, but about showing how celebrity journalists will print anything. If it’s funny and silly no one is going to bother suing, and the newspaper is more likely to run it.
  3. Have a name. This is very important to the journalists as a way of standing up a story (Clint Eastwood’s character in The Good, The Bad and The Ugly would have had real problems here) so make up a fake name. Silly names are also good – please let us know which ones you get away with (Neve O’Loony was our best fake source yet, just so you know the standard you have to aim for)
  4. Have a phone number. This is extremely important to tabloid hacks, as no-one ever lied who had an operational telephone. Buy a pay as you go sim card for a fiver – you will easily cover the cost with your first story.

Follow these 4 rules and you should have your fake stories running round the world in no time. Additional tips:

Start with a kernel of truth. Do a small amount of research about which celebrity you are intending to make something up about. We found that certain paparazzi websites are updated almost real-time, (mrpaparazzi.com is great for this) so you can get a good handle on which celebrities have been where the night before. The tabloids own gossip pages are also useful for inspiration, and if it’s based on a happening that’s been printed in their own pages then – by some wonderful circular logic – they will naturally believe it to be true. If you create your own story based on real celebrity comings and goings, it is much more likely to stand up. Remember the tabloid journalists you are trying to convince are just sitting in an office looking at the same internet sites as you to back your story up.

Most tabloid celebrity stories are about celebs either doing or saying things. So you can go for a simple “Sarah Harding was drunk coming out of club” or “Lilly Allen said that her new album is great” but these aren’t going to get much traction as these banal titbits fly around all the time. To get something prominent you need to give it an unusual twist. So once you’ve found out that two well known celebs were in a west end club, you need to invent your own details. Maybe they had a tug of war? Maybe someone dazzled there fellow diners with a display of knee slapping, which was only topped by a page 3 model showing off her skill at playing the spoons?

Also avoid anything too fantastical – “Peaches Geldof was seen levitating over the Thames” is unlikely to be picked up by even the most gullible tabloid hack with the possible exception of the Sunday Sport. Then again we have seen some pretty insane stories appearing in recent years, so it’s worth trying something physically impossible every now and then to see if you can get away with it.

Who are you? How did you come across this story? Tabloid journalists prefer eyewitness sources, but they will also accept “my mate told me that” sources as well. Quite often people call up who happened to see something or randomly overhead a quote. Maybe you were on your sisters birthday in Café de Paris when David Walliams farted “God Save the Queen”. Maybe you’re a cab driver and you overheard Jamie Winstone saying he used to be a member of the boyscouts and still goes on camping trips in his shorts and his woggle. Make it potentially believable but keep the details vague, so they don’t have much to pull you up on.

Timing is key. Tabloids have a print cut off between 4-6 pm, so it’s good to wait until the afternoon to call in. This is because they will be sitting there with empty pages to fill and under intense pressure to produce something hot. Also if you call in an hour before they go to press it gives them no time to check your story out.

Who to call? We would always call the same story around several papers, which increases your chances of getting it run.

The Mirror 0800 289 441. Desperate for tips, and probably the easiest paper to get nonsense stories printed. That’s what 10 years of having Piers Morgan as editor will do to a newspaper. Our researcher did so well selling them nonsense that they actually asked her to come in and work for them. Be warned – once we called up to check what the payment would have been for a story that they had run, but they said that they wouldn’t pay anything.
The Daily Star 0208 612 7373. Also pays well for stories. We had several successes here. Also prone to add their own fantastic details which is always good for a laugh.
The Sun – 020 7782 4100. Pretty gullible, but has peculiar print cut off at 10.30 am for showbiz stories. Also pays very well, we would have got £600 for our lead story in the Bizarre column of Sarah Harding being a fan of Quantum Physics.
The Express – 0207 098 2982. Chronically understaffed so lots of opportunity to feed them nonsense. Though in fairness the Sunday Express was the only paper to turn down the medical records sting, so hats off to them.

The Call. It’s worth rehearsing a few times with a friend and practise thinking on your feet. The best liars do so by first convincing themselves (think Tony Blair and Iraq), so try and imagine yourself actually in the club or bar, and get as many details in your head as you can. When you call stay in character and try not to laugh. It’s no good if you start the call as a Geordie and end it as a Scot (though this did happen to us and they still ran the story). They are likely to ask you:
-How you got to see what you saw
-A few details about you
-How much the celebrity had had to drink
-What they were wearing
If they ask anything that you think might rumble you it’s best not to guess. Say you can’t remember, that you were drunk, or that you need to check with your mate and then call them back. Don’t worry too much about sounding unreliable… they print stories from unreliable sources every day of the year.

The money. Prices range form £50 for a couple of lines at the bottom of the page, to £600 for a lead story in the Bizarre column in The Sun. They only pay out for a story when it’s printed, and make sure you get the price agreed in the phone call, and hold them to it (some papers are notorious for reneging on deals, so make sure it’s properly agreed)

To get paid just give them your real bank account details and your fake name and the payment will go through – people have told us this works. They can’t do anything with these details against you and they’ll never find out it was a hoax anyway.

If at first you don’t succeed… keep on trying! Sometimes our calls led nowhere, other times we had several stories running at once. It’s impossible to predict what journalist is going to fall for which story, so it’s best to play the numbers and do lots of stories to lots of papers over time. Have different characters and accents and keep on calling, and remember to let us know of your successes!


Filed under: The MEDIA, The SOCIETY Tagged: Michael Jackson, PCC, Press Complaints Commission

Jacksons – AEG trial DAY 44. Dr. FINKELSTEIN’S DEPOSITION and truth about opiates

$
0
0

MEDIA GAMES

Several things are worrying me about the AEG trial. And one of them is that there are too many instances when the media publishes only half-truth, quarter-truth or even one tenth of the truth about the witnesses’ testimonies at the trial. With very few exceptions the media cuts facts into pieces, takes several, boosts them out of all proportion and brushes aside the rest or mentions them in a way that no one really notices. The result is extremely slanted reporting.

Dr. Stuart Finkelstein

Dr.  Finkelstein

For example, Dr. Finkelstein’s video deposition about morphine he gave to Michael Jackson on the Dangerous tour was reproduced by the media in incredible detail and with noticeable exaltation, but the reason for giving the painkiller explained by Dr. Schnoll was mentioned only in passing, if ever at all.

Dr.Schnoll who consults all major drug- producing companies in the US on the effect of opioids said that these drugs were given by Dr. Finkelstein and other doctors to Michael on a completely legitimate basis to help him cope with pain from the scalp surgery.

The series of operations on his scalp was made following the Pepsi burn and one of them was just on the eve of the last leg of the Dangerous tour, in 1993.

Dr. Schnoll

Dr. Schnoll

However the LA Times chose to address the two days of Dr. Schnoll’s testimony with a quick couple of sentences only, while a relatively short Dr. Finkelstein’s video deposition was slowly and thoroughly savored like some juicy delicatessen.

This way the media reports the fact, but fails to report the reason for it. And in matters of drug dependency the reason for the dependency is the core of the very problem and it is absolutely crucial to know how it started.

If this is not done this half-reporting can label someone a “junkie” and if you are not told the second half of the story you will never know that it was President Kennedy who was given opioids on a legitimate basis as he had a spinal injury and was suffering from a severe pain. And he by the way was the one who averted a nuclear catastrophe in the 60s.

Dr. Schnoll said that if it is impossible to treat a patient’s underlying condition he may stay on opiate painkillers for the rest of his life, and that these people are perfectly able to fulfill their duties. In fact when under medication they function even much better as it relieves them of the pain which otherwise would wholly debilitate them.

THE BIG DIFFERENCE

Let us agree about one thing once and for all – the patient who has a severe underlying condition and was made dependent on a drug by doctors, who are unable to find another way to treat their patient except with painkillers, is absolutely not to blame for the resulting dependency. And this patient absolutely cannot be confused with someone who takes drugs for recreation in order to get high.

Ryan White and MJ. Gone Too Soon

Ryan White and Michael Jackson. Gone too soon

Putting the pain sufferers dependent on drugs on a par with some irresponsible addicts is the same as throwing into one class street addicts who get AIDS by passing over an infected syringe to one another and an innocent child like Ryan White who got this disease through a blood transfusion and doctor’s neglect.

The result is the same – both get infected, but the reasons for the disease are totally different and I don’t know how hypocritical one should be not to notice the difference.  The first are innocent victims of the circumstances, doctor’s negligence or incompetence, and the second are victims of their own indulgence, irresponsibility and very often of simple but tragic curiosity.

This difference between drug addiction and a forced drug dependency is what Dr. Schnoll was essentially talking about, however if you read the LA Times you won’t see any of these “subtleties”. In fact if you look at their articles you will be hardly able to tell one doctor from the other as the headlines are virtually undistinguishable and freely use the word “drug addict” in connection with MJ.

In contrast to LA Times neither Dr. Schnoll nor Dr. Finkelstein used this word for Michael Jackson in their testimonies – one of them said that Michael was dependent and the other said he had an opiate problem. The word “addict” was not even applied to MJ as it is totally inconsistent with Michael Jackson’s behavior in the first place.

Those who have read Dr. Schnoll’s testimony will be surely impressed by the way his two days of testimony were cut and twisted by the LA Times:

Specialist: ‘I don’t know’ if Michael Jackson was a drug addict

By Kate Mather

July 3, 2013, 7:04 p.m.

Michael Jackson’s drug use was again the topic of conversation in court Wednesday, where an addiction specialist testified that he saw no evidence the singer was addicted to painkillers or the anesthetic propofol that ultimately led to his death.

Dr. Sidney Schnoll acknowledged that after Jackson interrupted his 1993 “Dangerous” tour to seek treatment for an addiction to painkillers, he was given propofol during medical procedures and Demerol for back and scalp pain.

But Schnoll said that based on his review of the case, there was not enough material to provide a definite diagnosis.

“I don’t know if he was a drug addict,” Schnoll testified. “I’ve not seen any evidence that would give me the information that would allow me to make a diagnosis of addiction.”

Jackson’s drug use has come up several times during the 10-week trial, including opening statements when Jackson family attorney Brian Panish said the singer had at times been “dependent” on prescription medication after being badly burned while filming a Pepsi commercial in 1984.

Schnoll, hired by the Jacksons’ attorneys, said that even if the singer was addicted or dependent on drugs, “If he got proper treatment, he would have had a normal life expectancy.”

He added: “If his underlying medical conditions — the pain, the insomnia — had been appropriately treated, he may have been able to get off of those medications or been treated appropriately.”

When asked by Jackson family attorney Michael Koskoff if other factors — including Jackson’s family, career, financial resources and love of fans — would have helped improve the success of any treatment, Schnoll said it would.

But a cardiologist such as Murray, Schnoll said, would not be “competent” to treat any drug problem Jackson might have had.

“He was an intervention cardiologist, which is a highly specialized area of medicine,” Schnoll said of Murray. “Intervention cardiologists have no background in treating problems of substance abuse, they have no background in treating pain … they look at hearts, which is totally unrelated.”

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-michael-jackson-trial-20130703,0,6569766.story

And those who are familiar with Dr. Finkelstein’s deposition will appreciate the meticulous way every detail of that drug story was reported by Jeff Gottlieb. The author is trying so hard to stigmatize Michael that even makes two factual mistakes – Dr. Finkelstein didn’t call Michael an addict and it is impossible to give “a 24-hour morphine drip” to anyone at all.

Dr. Finkelstein was intermitting morphine with IV fluids as Michael was dehydrated and Dr. Finkelstein testified to that too.

Michael was awake, they chatted, watched 3 Stooges and even had squirt gun fights. I doubt that any of these activities would have been possible if he had been under round-the-clock morphine.

Doctor says he told AEG exec that Michael Jackson was a drug addict

A doctor who traveled on Michael Jackson’s 1993 worldwide “Dangerous” tour testified that he gave the singer a shot of Demerol and a 24-hour intravenous morphine drip while they were in Thailand and that he told a ranking AEG executive that the singer was a drug addict.

By Jeff Gottlieb

July 8, 2013, 2:46 p.m.

A doctor who traveled on Michael Jackson’s 1993 worldwide “Dangerous” tour testified that he gave the singer a shot of Demerol and a 24-hour intravenous morphine drip while they were in Thailand and that he told a ranking AEG executive that the singer was a drug addict.

Dr. Stuart Finklestein, who testified via a video deposition that was played for jurors Monday, said he was a long-time friend of Paul Gongaware, who was tour manager of the “Dangerous” concerts and is one of the defendants in the wrongful death suit brought by Jackson’s mother and three children.

The testimony came in the 43rd day of the wrongful-death trial, a case that seeks to put blame for Jackson’s death of entertainment titan and two music industry executives.

Finklestein is now an addiction specialist, but when he went on tour with Jackson his job was to minister to the crew. He said the first time he met Jackson was when he was called to his hotel room, where the singer appeared to be in pain. Finklestein said he was put on the phone with Allan Metzger, the singer’s doctor in Los Angeles. Metzger told him that Jackson had a severe headache and that he should administer pain medication.

Finklestein said he gave Jackson a shot of Demerol, “but his buttocks were so scarred up and abscessed that the needle almost bent. … He obviously had had multiple injections in his buttocks prior to arriving in Bangkok.”

The doctor said he spend the next 24 hours giving Jackson morphine until he was able to go on stage. “We were watching the Three Stooges and having squirt gun fights,” Finklestein testified.

After a second concert in Bangkok was postponed, Finklestein said, he met with promoter Marcel Avram and a publicist. The publicist said “the sound byte is that Michael Jackson is dehydrated,” the doctor testified, and repeated that explanation to CNN.

The doctor said that Jackson was wearing a Duragesic patch, which contains another opiate, fentanyl, that is absorbed through the skin. He also said that Karen Faye, Jackson’s longtime makeup artist and hair stylist, gave him two ampules of Demerol that were for Jackson’s injections. According to Finklestein, Metzger had written a Demerol prescription for Faye. But Finklestein said he understood the prescription was actually for Jackson.

Finklestein said that he told the concert promoters that he thought Jackson was an addict but that no one believed him. The doctor said he also told Gongaware that Jackson was dependent on opiates.

The doctor said that Gongaware, a current AEG Live executive, told him, “Don’t be a Dr. Nick,” a reference to the doctor who supplied Elvis Presley with the prescription drugs that led to his death.

Finklestein said Gongaware was trying to warn him, “don’t get all infatuated where you start administering drugs to a rock star and having him die on you.”

The tour came to an early end in Mexico City when Elizabeth Taylor flew in for an intervention and took Jackson to a hospital in England.

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln–michael-jackson-drug-addict-20130708,0,1132458.story

I’m afraid that we will have to talk about Dr. Finkelstein’s story for the rest of the trial, so  for fuller coverage of it I made a compilation of ABC tweets and a more detailed account from TeamMichaelJackson posted here. To remind myself and everyone of the events that formed a background to the story I am also adding the timeline from MJJ Timeline and Lisa Campbell’s book.

Here is Dr. Finkelstein’s video deposition played at the AEG trial:

MONDAY JULY 9, 2013 DAY 44

The ABC7 Court News tweets say:

Hello from the courthouse in downtown LA. Day 44, Week 11 of Jackson family vs AEG trial under way.
Katherine Jackson present in court wearing silk bright purple jacket. Rebbie is accompanying her.
Jacksons’ attorney called Dr. Stuart Finkelstein by video deposition. He treated MJ 93 Dangerous Tour. Kevin Boyle did the questioning.
The video began playing at 10:37 am PT. It was recorded on Feb 1, 2013.
Dr. Finkelstein said he worked at Cerritos Family Clinic until 2 years ago with his ex-wife Petra Wong, now works at Stuart Finkelstein, MD.

TeamMichaelJackson continues:

Boyle: what other training have you had?

Dr. Finkelstein 95 certifications tests, 2010 became aboard, I’m boarded by American board in addiction medicine

Q. Prior to 95 were you treating?

A. I was fulfilling my requirements, 50% time treating addiction med, and continuing medical educations for treating addiction meds. Two years to sit for the test, 4 years to get that. Started working in psychiatrist facility and treating detox,

Q. What year did you finish you med residency?

A. 1993

Q. What year did you work at psychiatrist facility?

A. From 93 onward worked at Charter hospital, college hospital Cerritos,

Q. Consider yourself expert?

A. Yes

Q. We are talking about world famous MJ, did you meet him?

A. Yes hired to go on tour called Dangerous in 93, was in Bangkok, MJ came to perform concert, after that I was requested to go to his hotel room.

So during the Dangerous tour the doctor was hired by the concert promoter and as Dr. Finkelstein will further say the compensation to the doctor was provided by the promoter too.  Evidently this was customary practice for all Michael’s tours and “This is it” was no exception. Michael wanted AEG to cover the medical costs and Tohme said that AEG even agreed to it. Now they say different of course.

Q. Who hired you?

A. MAMA Marcel Avram,

Q. What was your role supposed to be?

A. Physician for the crew

Q. Also the artist?

A. Yep.

Q. Who provided your transportation to Bangkok? 

A. The tour

Q. Did you see MJ before you were asked to go to his room?

 A. No

Q. Who asked you to go to his room? 

A. Probably one of the security was sent to summoned me

Q. Do you know why you were summoned? 

A. No

Q. What did he say?

A. You need to go to the principal’s room

Q. What else did that security say?

A. I can’t remember if it was security

Q. What did you see in the room?

A. Mr Jackson, he appeared to be in pain, I was put on the phone with his treating physician in LA, Dr Metzger told me MJ was in lot of pain, he asked me to administer pain medication.

Q. Did he tell you what to administer?

A. I cant remember what he said, I attempted to give him a shot of Demerol, but his buttock was so abscessed, the needle almost bent, that was not safe route to administer med, it may not get to him, so I administered a IV and gave him morphine.

- Asked what is opioids –

Q. At this meeting when you gave morphine, what did you do next?

A. Can I clarify? At that time I was not an expert, I was studying.

Q. You were studying, you were licensed to do, you know what you were doing?

A. Yes. I spent then next 24 hrs in his room, until MJ was capable of going on to perform on stage.

Q. The 24hrs you were intermittently administering meds, what was it?

A. Morphine and IV fluids

Q. Was MJ awake?

A. Yes

Q. What were you doing?

A. We were talking about Hayvenhurst, watching 3 stooges, chatting (ABC: having squirt gun fights) 

Q. Did he go on stage as soon as this 24 hr period ended?

A. Yes. 

This was happening on August 24th 1993 after the first tour concert in Bangkok. The second concert was postponed and took place on August 27. The official statement about the postponement was dehydration and in his deposition Dr. Finkelstein confirmed that besides the pain on his scalp Michael was dehydrated.

Here is the background for those events, cited from MJJ Timeline:

  • 21.08. 1993 Bangkok

    21.08. 1993 Bangkok

    August 17:  The Los Angeles Police Department opens a criminal investigation against Michael Jackson based on accusations of child molestation made by Jordan Chandler

  • August 21: Michael arrives in Bangkok  for the third leg of his Dangerous World Tour. The LAPD serve search warrant on Michael’s Neverland Valley Ranch in Santa Barbara and on his condominium in CenturyCity.
  • August 24: Michael gives a concert in Bangkok while the media reveal that Michael is under criminal investigation for child molestation which becomes of the biggest scandals of all.
  • August 25: Michael’s second concert in Bangkok is rescheduled to august 26 because Michael is suffering from acute dehydration.
  • August 26:   It was being reported in the news that the investigation had widened to include four more boys. All of the boys interviewed told police their relationship with Michael was purely brotherly, that there was no inappropriate behavior on Michael’s part whatsoever.
    Brett Barnes, from Melbourne, Australia vehemently defended his friend telling a Los Angeles TV station, KNBC, “He’s like a best friend, except he’s big”. Brett Barnes & Wade Robson appear on CNN to defend Michael but their admissions that they shared a bed with Michael Jackson (in a friendly, slumber party spirit) only causes more damage…
Bangkok 1993

Bangkok 1993

  • Michael’s concert is again rescheduled for August 27 (he releases an audio-taped message to his fans): “To all my fans in Bangkok, Thailand, I am sorry for not performing yesterday as I am really sick and still under medical treatment. I have been instructed by my doctor not to perform before Friday, August 27, 1993. I promise all my fans to perform at the National Stadium in Bangkok on August 27. I will see you all on Friday. I love you all. Goodbye.”
  • August 27:Michael finally performs his second concert in Bangkok

Back to Dr. Fikelstein’s deposition:

Q. Did he perform, did he look ok to you?

A Yes, the second concert in Bangkok was postponed at my recommendation for a day. I was on CNN, there was a publicist there, the sound bite was MJ is dehydrated, I went on to TV and said that

Q. Was MJ dehydrated?

A. Yes

Q. But was he suffering from anything else?

A. I thought he had an opiate problem.

Q. Do you mean dependency?

A. Yes

ABC7 Court News:

Dr. Finkelstein: MJ had 100 micro gram duragesic patch on and there were 2 ampules of Demerol that were sent to him with another crew member
The doctor said he had someone he felt that obviously had received a lot of medication in the past, had a high tolerance to medication.
Dr Finkelstein: It was early in my training, but it was obviously a concern for me. Duragesic is also called Fentanyl, another opiate.
Boyle: You testified about 2 ampules – what were you talking about, the ampules of Demerol?
Dr. Finkelstein: We are talking about natural opiates and synthetic opiates. The patch, the medication is absorbed through the skin.
The doctor said the ampules were given to him by the make-up artist, Karen Faye. They were for MJ.

TeamMichaelJackson:

Q. So we have the patch, ampoules given to you by Karen Faye, scarring on MJ buttock, high tolerance, led you to believe?

A. That he was dependent on opiates

Q. Did you ask him any questions about opiates?

A. No

Q. Was Mr Gongaware tour manager of that tour?

A. I don’t know his title he was my friend, he used to be road manager working for Concert West, he worked for Warren Miller, we skied together, its because of Gongaware I got involved on the Dangerous tour, he called me to come on the tour

Q. Was compensation discussed, who would be providing that?

A. The promoter Marcel.

Q. When the Bangkok show got postponed, did Gongaware postpone it?

A. I did.

Oh, so it was Dr. Finkelstein who postponed a concert? Can any of us imagine Conrad Murray postponing a concert scheduled by AEG? It is simply impossible! Conrad Murray was so much pressurized by AEG that he was not able to give Michael a sick leave even for a rehearsal and the only time he tried it ended in a riot meeting where the artist was played a tough love and now-or-never card.

And after that AEG says that Murray was a totally independent doctor?

Dr. Finkelstein confirms that Gongaware knew of the drugs he was giving to Michael on the Dangerous tour. Gongaware naturally doesn’t remember it now. This amnesia helps AEG bosses to support their official position that Michael was in excellent health up to the last minute. Dr. Finkelstein continues:

Q. Did you tell Mr Gongware about anything?

A. Yes, I told him I think we have a problem, cant remember exactly what I said.

Q. Did you tell him MJ had a dependency to opiates?

A. Yes he told me don’t be a Dr Nick, that was Elvis’s Doctor

Q. So was it your understanding PG knew you were providing Mj with meds?

A. Yes there was a meeting I informed them about problems with Michael Jackson

Q. Did you tell them MJ had dependency on opiates?

A. You are asking me to speculate, I told them I don’t know if they believed me,

Q. And PG was at that meeting?

A. Well I made that statement to him regardless of whether he was at the meeting

Q. You say they didn’t believe you?

A. Well, I wasn’t an addiction specialist, they didn’t believe me, my concern was for MJ, I informed the promoters and Paul Gongaware.

Q. As what point did they come to believe you?

A. Yes in Mexico City, after MJ went on stage another doctor came from England, I left when I got back my suitcase with all the meds my suit case was broken into, that doctor told me he took the meds, and said he didn’t want to get the blame for a problem he had inherited.

Q. What did you do?

A. I wanted to detox him in Switzerland and go on with the tour

Q. Was that doctor Dr Forecast?

A. Yes

Q. Why did he break into your case?

A. I had enough meds for what I thought 160 people would need in third world countries, so had many meds

Q. What med did he take?

A. Pain med

Q. Demerol?

A. I cant remember Demerol or morphine

Q. Was that first time you say Dr Forecast?

A. No,

Q. In Mexico you saw Forecast administering meds to MJ?

A. Yes

Q. Then what happened?

A. They powers got together, they called Liz Taylor and got MJ to London

Q. Who are the powers?

A. I don’t know, managers, promoters

Q. Was Gongware part of that group?

A. Don’t know

Q. Did MJ collapse in Mexico?

A. No, it seemed Forecast was having hard time keeping up, also there was deposition for child molestation charge from Chandler (correction: it was a deposition for a copyright infringement)

Q. Did those claims increase MJs problems?

A. Yes.

Q. So there were cancellations?

A. Interventions

Q. Did Liz come to get MJ?

A. Yes

Q. Were they cancelled?

A. I don’t know if they were postponed or canceled, but we stayed much longer in Mexico then anticipated

Q. Do you know what Forecast role was on tour?

A. Are you asking me to speculate?

Q. No what did you see him doing?

A. He took care of the principal, Mr Jackson

Q. Do you know who was employing Forecast?

A. For sure NO.

DR. FORECAST

Let me interrupt Dr. Finkelstein and remind you of what Karen Faye said about Dr. Forecast:

Panish: Dr. Forecast. Was it your understanding that he was a medical doctor?

Karen Faye: I just knew he was brought in. He was the insurance doctor.

Q. There was a time on the tour you discovered Michael had been given too many drugs and couldn’t perform. What did you learn?

A. Yes. Michael came into the dressing room. He was stumbling. He had a hard time walking. He actually fell over a potted plant/tree. Dr. Forecast was there. I told him: Michael can’t go on. He has to enter on a toaster. Toasters are very small. You have to curl up and be shot out of it. He could lose an arm. I’m seeing Michael in this state and I said you can’t put him in this position. I feared for his safety. I feared for his life. I told Dr. Forecast: You can’t. You can’t make him go out there like this. I put my arms around Michael and said: You can’t take him. And he said: Yes, I can. He put his hands around my neck, backed me against the wall and said: You don’t know what you are doing. I couldn’t breathe. I almost fainted. I fell to the floor. He grabbed Michael and took him off to the stage.

Q. That was Dr. Forecast.

A. That was Dr. Forecast.

From Dr. Finkelstein we learn that when Michael was deposed in Mexico he was under medication given to him by Dr. Forecast.

Actually it was noticeable even in the video though Michael remembered all his songs, answered all questions and was extremely patient and polite – in short he was his usual self.

In his deposition Dr. Finkelstein remembers Michael as a sweetheart – kind, never yelling, never demanding and never treating people bad.

His personality traits did not change even under strong medication and this is extremely important as MJ’s detractors can use Michael’s drug dependency for their own dirty purposes in no time.

But lying to us that under medication Michael would be different is useless – we remember that even in a half-unconscious state he spoke to Murray about God and his dream to build a hospital for children, and even under morphine he remained the same big kid who played squirt gun fights both with teenagers or adults like Dr. Finkelstein who were ten years older.

Dr. Finkelstein’s deposition continues:

Q. Was Gongaware in Mexico?

A. Yes he was my friend, we talked all the time

Q. Do you think you would have told PG of MJs problems?

A. Of course

Q. Then what happened in the tour?

A. I went home

Q. Do you know length of time between Bangkok and Mexico?

A. Approx. 3 mths

Q. Was Forecast on tour entire time?

A. Correct

Q. Did Forecast administer meds the whole time?

A. I saw him do it in Mexico during deposition, we were in communication, he didn’t want to take the hit for what other Doctors had done to him.

Q. Did you have understanding MJ had burn injury?

A. Yes

Q. From where?

A. Pepsi commercial

Q. How do you know he took medications?

A. From conversations with Karen Faye.

THE SCALP SURGERY

Since Karen Faye was mentioned again let me remind you of her earlier testimony which is already forgotten by everyone. She is explaining there what the media is not – the reason why Michael was in so much pain before the last leg of the Dangerous tour:

Q. Did anything unusual happen before the [Dangerous] tour started?

A. Yes.  We were doing the short film for Addams Family. Michael was going through the pain from the scalp surgery with the inserted balloon (bladder). He was having slow release pain medication patches put on his scalp to help him.

Putnam: And he had this surgery just before going to Bangkok?

Faye: I really don’t know the exact date of the surgery, sir. I worked with him on the shoot and the actual inflation device was under his scalp, just before we left Bangkok, the device was removed, an operation to bring the skin together on his scalp had already been complete.

Q. And you saw his scalp every time he performed, right?

A. Not every time he performed. But I had to deal with his wounds and covering them.

Q. Do you remember seeing any signs of that surgery on the prior leg of the tour?

A I do not recall on which leg of the tour, the in between stages, when he had the surgery.

Q. You do remember between legs of the tour he had the surgery and then you saw the results, but you don’t remember between which leg of the tour he had the surgery, correct?

A Correct. Or the year?

Q That was 92-93. This was 1993, we’re talking about Bangkok. And to be really specific, I can tell you it was August 23, 1993.

A And you’ve done your homework, sir.

Q And you said yesterday he would get headaches as a result of the surgery, correct?

A Yes. Migraine headaches. He was in a lot of pain.

So that balloon was put under Michael’s scalp sometime in 1993 and on August 23, 1993 it was removed? Goodness gracious, how could we miss those dates before?

First of all this was happening  throughout the period of the so-called “molestation” of Jordan Chandler and second, the worst days of that balloon treatment and the final surgery came right at the end of August when Evan Chandler made his vile accusations.

The surgery on Michael’s head was a week after the police investigation started, a couple of days before the media scandal broke out and just one day before Michael’s first concert in Bangkok!  Isn’t it really too much for one man?

Q. Is dependency a character flaw?

A. No, it’s a brain disease, if they are exposed enough to it their brain becomes dependent on it, or its genetic.

Q. The reason MJ was dependent was it because he was a weak person, would you agree to that?

A. NO

Q. How do you describe MJ?

A. HE WAS A SWEETHEART, HE WAS KIND

Q. Did you ever see him yelling, demanding things?

A. NO

Q. He didn’t treat people bad if they were in lower rank?

A. No

Q. Gongaware was on tour the whole time on tour?

A. Yes

Q. Do you have any thoughts how Gongaware could help MJ get better?

A. We had that discussion with Forecast, and that was to do an interventions

Q. Between Bangkok and Mexico any cancelations?

A. Yes there were frequent cancellations and postponements

 CONCERTS

Let me interrupt them again and say that despite Michael’s obviously terrible condition there were not as many cancellations as one could expect. The first several concerts were postponed due to Michael’s wounds being still fresh from recent surgery, and the last several concerts were postponed due to the dependence on drugs he had developed by then, but the concerts in the middle were performed as planned.

The MJJ Timeline says that after the second concert cancelled Michael had a brain scan in hospital:

Israel, 1993

Israel, 1993

August 28: Michael arrives in Singapore.

August 29: Michael gives a concert in Singapore on his 35th birthday.

August 30: Joseph, Katherine, Jermaine, Tito & Rebbie Jackson give a press conference to support Michael & announce the Jackson Family Honors Police search Michael’s hotel room at the Mirage Hotel in Las Vegas.

The second concert in Singapore is cancelled when Michael collapses backstage moments before the show is due to begin suffering from a severe migraine.

August 31: Michael undergoes a brain scan in hospital and he releases a second audio-taped message to apologize for the late cancellation of his concert. Attorney Gloria Allred is retained to represent Jordy Chandler.

September 1: Michael performs his second concert in Singapore and after the show he goes shopping until 2:30 am.

September 2: LaToya Jackson supports Michael on US Today Show.

September 3:Michael arrives in Taipei with Elizabeth Taylor. Joe, Katherine, Jermaine, Jackie, Rebbie & the 3T also arrive in Taipei to support him.

September 4: Michael performs in concert in Taipei .

Israel 1993

Israel 1993

September 5: Michael goes shopping to Toy’s R Us in Taipei with the 3T.

September 6: Michael performs his second concert in Taipei .

September 7: Michael & the 3T arrive in Fukuoka (Japon) then board a bus to Huis Ten Bosh, a theme park, where they stay for two days.

September 9: Michael returns to Fukuoka .

September 10: Michael performs in concert in Fukuoka

September 11: Second concert in Fukuoka .

September 12: Michael arrives in Moscow (Russia).

September 13: Michael goes shopping in Moscow and tours the Kremlin museum of armory.

September 14: Gloria Allred mysteriously resigns from representing Jordy and is replaced by Larry Feldman. A civil suit against Michael is filed in Los Angeles Superior Court. Michael shoots a video of himself marching with Russian army soldiers. September 15: Michael performs in concert in Moscow .

Israel 1993

Israel 1993

September 17: Michael arrives in Tel Aviv ( Israel ). At Michael’s request, Dominic Cascio and his children Frank & Eddie arrive from NYC to support him.

September 18: Michael visits Jerusalem . He is met by religious protesters at the ancient Western Wall but is welcomed at Masada , another historic site.

September 19: Michael performs in concert in Tel Aviv.

September 21: Second concert in Tel Aviv. Two detectives fly to Manila to question Mark & Faye Quindoy.

Back to Dr. Finkelstein’s deposition:

Q. After Mexico you never joined the tour?

A. No, it didn’t carry on

Q. After Dangerous tour did you work with MJ again?

A. No

Q. On tours?

A. No

Q. Any music related events?

A. I get called out to staple center, if someone has sore throat, sprained ankle, or other complaints, I was there two weeks ago

Q. Were you called By AEG personal?

Buenos-Aires with a Cascio

Buenos-Aires with Cascio

A. By promoters, as rock doc, I don’t know how my name is out there, probably because I’ve been doing it for 30 yrs

Q. You get called to Orange county to do similar work?

A. Yes

Q. When did that start getting called at StapleCenter as “Rock Doc”?

A. Probably since 83 when my older brother was managing Concert West, before Staple center was doing concerts as AEG

Q. Did you ever get contacted again for MJ?

A. Yes, month to two months before MJs death

Q. And who contacted you?

A. Paul Gongaware.

Q. What did he say?

A. Hey stewy you may have another chance to go on tour with Michael Jackson

Q. How many calls did you get for this tour?

A. 5-10

Q. What did you talk about?

A. I said is he clean?

Q. What did he say?

A. Yes’

Q. Why did you ask that?

A. I didn’t want a repeat of what happened before

Q. What else?

A. I asked him how he know MJ was clean, he said they had a medical, and MJ’s physician said he was clean, and he asked me how much I wanted to charge

Q. How much did you want?

A. $10,000 A week, $40,000

Q. Did Gongaware want you to go on tour?

A. Yes he wanted me to he was working it out for me

Buenos-Aires 1993

Buenos-Aires 1993

Q. Obviously you didn’t go?

A. Correct

Q. Were you ever told you were not going to be hired?

A. Must have been

Q. Did you learn anything from actually speaking to Gongaware about Murray?

A. I remember there was a lot of money

Q. Did you discuss with Gongaware about MJ problems?

A. He told me he thought MJ was clean, because he passed his medical

Q.Was there any discussions about what happened in Bangkok?

A. No

Q. Is Propofol an opioid?

A. No

Q. Someone who is opioid dependent seek out other meds to curb there problems?

A. Yes its very common, for some reason they gravitate to “Gabo receptor” drugs, (names lots of drugs, ++barbiturates) and

Propofol. Usually with Propofol it occurs with those in the medical field, it has a high fatality rate its not something you mess around with, there is no reversal agent for it, there have been 80 cases of Propofol addiction reported

Q. What about alcohol, would someone who has opioid dependency use alcohol?

A.  Yes

Q. You have all walks of life that have opioid dependency?

A. Correct

Q. Lawyers, mothers, fathers, etc. etc.,?

A. Yes

Q. What is “rock doc”?

A. I don’t know, but the newspaper put me on the front page, I don’t know how your name gets on that list. …Bob Finkelstein used to be manager of Concert West and Management 3, Paul Gongaware knew him

Q. Do you know Randy Phillips?

A. Yes he has something to do with Anschutz group, seen him at birthday parties, John Meglan, he works for AEG,

Q. Have you seen him at music events?

Buenos- Aires with Frank and Eddie Cascios

Buenos- Aires with Frank and Eddie Cascios

A. Yes but no meaningful conversation

Q. Back to PG and TII tour was anything else discussed aside from what we have discussed? What it discussed if housing would be provided for you in UK?

A. No

Q. Transportation?

A. NO, there were not a lot of discussion till I get hired

Q. And you were told by PG why you were not getting hired?

A. Yes he told me Michael wanted a different doctor

Q. Did he tell you CM was a cardiologist?

A. We didn’t talk much about that at all, PG was my friend.

CAHAN NOW QUESTIONING DR FINKELSTEIN

Q. You testified you administered IV to MJ, what dosage of demeroal was it?

A. 150 over

Q. Would that be typical to those that are naïve to opioids?

A. Yes

Q. Was it in his buttock?

A. I tried

Q. He had a lot of scarring ?

A. yes

Q.

Buenos-Aires, 1993

Buenos-Aires, 1993

Do you know how many shots he may have had?

A. Significant, extensive amount

Q. Why did you think it was opioids injections that caused the scarring?

A. Because he had a patch on, there was another person with two ampoules

Q. Do you recall whose name those were prescribed to?

A. Yes, Karen Faye

Q. Demerol was not for KF, who was it prescribed by?

A. Dr Metzger.

Q. What was morphine dose?

A. 10mill

Q. Repeated?

Buenos -Aires with the Cascios

Buenos -Aires with the Cascios

A. Yes

Q. How many over 24hrs?

A. don’t know

Q. Is that typical starting dose?

A. No

Q. What is starting dose?

A. 2-3

Q. Did MJ say anything to do in regards to opioids?

A. I based it on observations

Q. Was he suffering pain?

A. Yes

Q. Did you ever administer pain meds when he was not in pain?

A. No

Q. Every time you administered pain med did you believe he was suffering pain?

A. Yes

Q. You were asked what PG know about MJ during tour, setting aside that first meeting if PG

Santiago,, 1993

Santiago,, 1993

(sorry laptop died at this point, lost few q and A)

Still Cahan questioning Dr Finkelstein:

Q. Did Forecast ever tell you MJ was secretive about what drugs were being administered?

A. It was always secretive, no one doctor knew the full story.

Q. Other then speaking to Forecast on tour did you ever speak with him again?

A. Once in 95 corresponded with him, I was asked to go and see Michael because he was in pain, then I went on dive trip, for some

reason MJ canceled rehearsal, I faxed my records over to Dr Metzger

BACK TO BOYLE

Q. Did you have antidote?

A. Yes Narcan. If I am going to administer medication, I am going to have safety plan

Q. You mentioned Klein came on Dangerous tour?

Santiago, 1993

Santiago, 1993

A. Yes he would come in repeatedly

Q. How about Dr Hoefflin?

A. He came couple time for weekend on Dangerous tour

Q. Did you spend time with him?

A. No

Q. You were not on History tour?

A. No

Q. Do you have any medical records of meds administered in Bangkok?

A. No they were stolen in Istanbul

Q. So you made records?

A. Yes

Q. In Mexico?

A. I kept a journal of everything I did but those were stolen in Istanbul. I had records from one visit in 95, but they got filed if I don’t see anyone for a long time, so they got called out, disposed of

Q. All those records of treating MJ?

Santiago, 1993

Santiago, 1993

A. Yes

Q. So any records you had of treating MJ were stolen, destroyed?

A. Yes

Q. can you tell me about your visit to MJ in 95?

A. I had a call from Brad Buxer He was having back spasm.

DEPOSITION ENDED, KEVIN BOYLE HAS SUBMITTED INTO EVIDENCE INCLUDING EXHIBITS.

teammichaeljackson.com/archives/8985

CANCELLATION OF THE TOUR

As regards the journal “stolen in Istambul” I need to make a couple of notes. Firstly, Istambul was on September 22nd and if the thief was sent from MJ’s part to “cover up the traces” they would have stolen the records after the tour and not in the middle of it. So it must have been the usual theft – for money, for example.

And second, there were several more cities after Istambul so Dr. Finkelstein should have had at least the second half of them, unless they also got filed and were destroyed.

The MJJ Timeline will tell the rest of the story for 1993. When you look at all of it you begin to understand why Michael could not stay alone during that tour and needed the support of his friends Frank and Eddie Cascios:

Tenerife 1993

Tenerife 1993

September 22: Michael arrives in Istanbul (Turkey) with Frank & Eddie. They go to the cinema to watch Jurassik Park. Jeanne White, Ryan White’s mother, tells the press that she met Jordy at Neverland in July and doesn’t believe he was molested by Michael.

September 23: Michael performs in concert in Istanbul.

September 24: Michael arrives in Tenerife with the Cascios.

September 26: Michael performs in concert in Tenerife .

September 27-October 6: Following the cancellation of the South African concerts due to continued violence there, Michael takes a break and go Switzeland with Frank & Eddie. They stay at Elizabeth Taylor’s chalet in Gstaad for several days and then visits Geneva .

October 7: Michel arrives in Buenos Aires with Frank & Eddie.

October 8/10/12: Concerts in Buenos Aires .

October 13: Michael arrives in Sao Paulo ( Brasil ) with Frank & Eddie.

October 15/17: Concerts in Sao Paulo .

October 18: Michael arrives in Santiago ( Chile ) with Frank & Eddie. Dr Arnold Klein & Debbie Rowe visit Michael.

October 21: Michael’s first concert in Santiago is cancelled due to a back injury.

October 23: Michael performs in Santiago .

October 24: Michael arrives in Mexico with Frank & Eddie.

October 27: Michael meets the President of Mexico.

Mexico, 1993

Mexico, 1993

October 29: Michael performs before 100 000 people in Mexico.

October 31: Second concert before 100 000 people in Mexico. Michael’s grandfather, Samuel Jackson dies at the age of 90.

November 2: Michael cancels his third Mexican concert due to a severe toothache.

November 4: Michael receives oral surgery to have an abscessed molar extracted and stays in hospital overnight.

November 5: Michael attends a party for children at the Hard Rock Café.

November 7: Third concert in Mexico

November 8: While the Jackson family is in Phoenix for Samuel Jackson’s funerals, the police search Hayvenhurst… Michael’s attorney Howard Manning flies to Mexico City to take a deposition from Michael for a copyright infringement lawsuit brought by three songwriters claiming Thriller, The Girl Is Mine & We Are The World were stolen from them…

Mexico 1993

Mexico 1993

November 9: Elizabeth Taylor & Larry Fortensky fly to to join Michael.  Fourth concert in Mexico.

November 11: Michael performs the 69th and last concert of the Dangerous World Tour in Mexico.

November 12: Michael leaves with Liz & Larry, stopping off in Canada and Iceland and finally lands at Luton airport in England. Liz & Larry fly on to Gstaad while Michael secretly goes to London . Frank & Eddie fly back to NYC.

November 12: He announces in an audio-taped message that he is cancelling the rest of the tour in order to seek treatment for an addiction to painkillers

November 14: A spokesman for Pepsico announces their relationship with Michael Jackson is over. Following Elton John’s advice, Michael checks in a private detox clinic in London .

November 16: Police obtain a strip search warrant for Michael Jackson in order to verify a description of his genitals given by Jordy…•

November 23: Dangerous: The Short Films is released on VHS

Mexico, 1993

Mexico, 1993

November 24: The administration of Michael’s music catalogue ATV moves from MCA Music to EMI Music Publishing. Los Angeles Superior Court judge, David Rothman sets March 21, 1994, as the date for the civil suit against Michael to begin, denying a request from Michael’s attorneys to delay the proceedings until the criminal investigation is completed.

December 02 : Katherine and Jermaine appear on CNN’s Showbiz Today and Hard Copy to defend Michael and refute remarks made by five former security guards.

December 08: LaToya shocks the world by holding a midnight press conference in Tel Aviv, Istrael where she says that she “can no longer be a silent collaborator” to Michael’s ‘crimes against young innocent victims”. Her husband and manager Jack Gordon is by her side.The Jackson family reacts immediately and holds a press conference at Hayvenhurst to refute LaToya’s claims. Katherine, Joe, Jermaine, Jackie, Tito & Randy tell CNN that LaToya has been brainwashed by her “money hungry” husband Jack Gordon.

Mexico, 1993

Mexico, 1993

December 08: Frank & Eddie visit Michael at his rehab center in London

December 10 :Michael leaves London and returns home to Neverland with Frank & Eddie.

December 22: Live from Neverland and around the world, Michael makes a 4 minutes statement where he claims his innocence and reveals that earlier this week he was forced bt the LAPD and SBPD to submit to a photo session of his body and genitals.

December 28: Concert promoter Marcel Avram files a $20 million breach of contract against Michael claiming Michael’s true condition was concealed on signing the contracts for the Dangerous Tour.

WHEN WAS THE SCALP SURGERY?

After all that talk about opiates and scalp surgery I could not resist looking up the schedule of the Dangerous tour in an attempt to guess when all those terrible procedures could take place:

  • The first leg began on June 27 1992 inMunich, Germany and ended on October 1 1992 in Bucharest, Romania.
  • The second leg began on December 12 1992 and ended on December 31 1992 inTokyo, Japan.
  • The third leg of the tour began on August 24 1993 inBangkok, Thailand and ended on November 11, 1993 inMexico City, Mexico.

Stretching the skin takes time, and the biggest break Michael had for this procedure was between January 1993 and August 1993. So to give more time for the operation most probably the balloon was put under Michael’s scalp at the beginning of 1993, when the second leg of the Dangerous tour was over and the third was planned only half a year later.

And this means that the first half of 1993 Michael was in very much pain as stretching the scalp is no easy matter – Michael said to his friend David Nordahl that it was giving him excruciating pain. We knew of it before but did not know when, and now we do and it turns out that it was exactly at the time when Michael was friends with the Chandlers and the period about which Evan and Jordan Chandler would make their allegations.

As Karen Faye and Dr. Finkelstein testified doctors were giving Michael painkillers by means of patches attached to his scalp. These patches and a balloon on his head is the reason why we see Michael sitting in the house of Jordan Chandler in some casual clothes but in a hat. He was having his scalp stretched at that time.

And this is why he was suffering from a terrible migraine when he was in Evan Chandler’s home on the last days of May, 1993. As you remember Evan gave him a shot of a painkiller Toradol in his “gluteus” (the buttocks) and by the way did not note any scarring there as no mention was ever made by him in that Ray Chandler’s book.

So whatever appeared on Michael’s buttocks appeared much later, when the pain from the balloon (or the allegations) must have become unbearable.

Michael’s detractors always catch at every opportunity to throw extra dirt at him, and I am afraid they will not lose the chance of saying that Michael was in so terrible a condition that under the effect of those painkillers he would “molest” Jordan Chandler, even probably not realizing it (in his sleep, unconsciously, etc).

Without waiting for them to say that let me state the following.

THE UNEXPECTED EFFECT OF OPIATES

I’ve looked up the effect opioids have on people and found that firstly, people under opioids stay very clear in their head and can function even better than without them as it dulls their pain. One of the most famous and brilliant world surgeons was dependent on opiates and performed operations after taking them.

However another possible effect of opiates is that a person will become drowsy and nod, even when standing or in the middle of the conversation.

As regards possible “molestation” I’ve also found that opiods have a unique and a very detrimental side-effect on men and women. It is  a complete loss of libido or sexual drive as opiates are suppressing the hormones responsible for it.

All people dependent on opioids complain of this problem and it is only recently that doctors began to recognize how universal it is. Some opiate dependent patients say sex is the last thing they are thinking of, some say that once a month for them is really too much, and all males say that it is not only because of their inability to perform but due to the total lack of desire.

This is what’s crucial for our case –  total lack of sexual desire.

So if Michael had sexual interests in anyone at all in 1993 all his interests would  have completely died out under the effect of the medication given to him at the time.

And from this point of view I have to agree with those who said that at some point he was “asexual” –  big science says that while he was given opioids sex was the last thing he was thinking of.

You will say that this is a very strange and funny way to prove that no “molestation” could take place even in theory and I will agree with you that it is indeed funny and strange, but I am not inventing anything and the asexual effect of opioids is indeed too common a phenomenon not to notice it.

Absolutely all males are going through it as the hormone system of all of them is affected in the same way. The sex drive restores later and even at an enhanced level as if to compensate for the time lost, but during the time of taking the drug and sometime after that the libido is gone, and this means that at that time Michael could not display any sexual interest to anyone at all…

No, I am not kidding.

I’ve been to their forums and this is what they say:

  • Just wondering if even a small amount of opiates would kill your sex drive. My husband has been taking smallish amounts for 2 weeks now for back pain and his sex drive is completely gone as is his desire for affection.
  • Yes any opiate will kill the libido.. some faster than others.
  • Absolutely. yes, yes and yes.
  • This is a common side effect from long term opiate use. Opiates can lower men’s testosterone levels leaving them with little or no libido. Have you ever heard of a horny heroin addict, no, me either lol.
  • It’s common for any type of opiate to cause this. The effect seems to continue to compound. So even if you stop using it for a while, your libido may come back, but maybe not as strong, and will disappear faster once you use it again. This on again, off again use of opiates for pain management will eventually cause you to completely loss your libido, and will eventually have other serious consequences.
  • When I’ve had morphine, sex has been the farthest thing from my mind
  • I promise you it all comes back. I had thought I might be washed up there for a while but PRAISE THE LORD it didn’t happen.
  • Just give it a little time and you will return to your old self. At least that is the way it worked for me. And that is how it works for most of us guys. Stupid opiates have to be the worst thing in the world for enhancing sexual performance. All they do is get us totally blitzed.
  • Welcome to the wonderful world of pain pills.  This is one of the most common side effects of several medications including RX pain meds. There is one way that will fix this problem for sure. Stop taking RX drugs.  That is undoubtedly not what you want to hear. But ALL of us that abused RX pain meds went through the same thing. And when we get clean guess what happens? It’s back to the days of old. At least that was what happened to me. Will look for your reply. God bless.
  • LOL,I have to agree with Robert, Thats the only way your going to get your sex drive back. been there…
  • My question is, how long after discontinuing opiate use can he hope to feel a return of his sex drive? He has noticed that it is drastically diminished from what it was a few years ago. He feels like he could have naked women walking right in front of him and has had a couple bad experiences with them in the same bed with him. He simply doesn’t feel any drive for sex. He doesn’t know why in terms of neuroscience that this happens but read that it may be a result of dopamine receptors being filled with opiate transmitters resulting in a feeling of being totally satisfied w/o sex. Any thoughts or feedback would be very much appreciated. Thanks!
  • I been very stressed and was just kind of floating around here and found this thread… I am totally in hysteria right now.. I needed the good laughs.. I am by no means degrating this problem and I am surprised I have never seen this topic brought up here before… But some of the posts here are making me laugh so hard for some reason… Maybe because its just the fact I have been there and can look back and see myself in the same situations and its so true..

I’ve been to their sites and this is what they say:

  • Many men are amazed to discover the facts on drugs and sex. The long term effects of medication and recreational drugs on the male sex drive can be extremely dampening, causing the hormonal balance of the body to become disrupted.
  • Opiates have a long history as drugs which dull the sexual urge. In the past 20 years the effect of opiates have been studied extensively in laboratory and farm animals. There have been few studies in humans, mostly those involving patients receiving oral or spinal pain therapy, with little in the way of systematic controlled experiments.
  • Opiates interfere with sex hormone levels which can cause lack of libido.
  • In male rats, morphine significantly reduces testosterone secretion.
  • In human subjects opiate therapy or abuse is widely associated with loss of libido (sex drive).
  • In studies of pain-management patients receiving opioid analgesic therapy, Abs et al reported: “Decreased libido was present in 23 of 24 men…, and in 22 of 32 women receiving opioids.
  • A single injection of morphine to fight persistent pain in male rats is able to strongly reduce the hormone testosterone in the brain and plasma, according to a new paper published in the journal Molecular Pain. It has been known that patients treated with opioids for short or long periods show low levels of gonadal hormones.
  • “The use of opioids puts a ‘physiological’ block on the reproductive system and can induce a long lasting absence of these essential hormones from the blood and the brain,” says Dr. Aloisi.  ”Until a few years ago this condition was completely unrecognized by physicians although some reports clearly showed it in many kinds of patients,” notes Dr. Aloisi.
  • We’ve often discussed the various negative side effects of opiate use and dependency; however one that is rarely discussed is loss of libido.  Many patients who are dependent on opiates and prescription painkillers, including those with chronic pain can experience a lack of sexual drive as well as sexual dysfunction.  This loss of desire and inability to perform is often caused by hormonal imbalances in the body or underlying emotional conditions.
  • According to a study published in the American Journal of Psychiatry, impaired sexual performance and diminished libido in opiate users can be caused by an interference of the drugs with sex hormone secretion.  In the study, once opiate use was discontinued researchers found that sexual drive returned to normal levels. http://www.opiates.com/newsletters/link-between-opiate-dependency-libido.html

I don’t know about you but I have definitely clarified my understanding of some ‘gaps’ in Michael’s private life despite all his powerful sexuality. He surely made up for it when the opiates were over, but how many times did doctors treat him that way in 1984 -1993?

If you disagree with the scientific findings in this respect I agree to consider them a case of anti-drug propaganda.


Filed under: AEG THE HORRIBLE, BRIDGE To Understanding Michael, Jacksons vs. AEG Tagged: AEG, Finkelstein, Michael Jackson, Schnoll

News summary of week 11 at the AEG trial. KENNY ORTEGA’S STORY

$
0
0

Here is the news summary of week 11 at the AEG trial, July 9-12 (there was no court on Friday July 13).

Monday July 9, 2013 DAY 44

Ortega and MJOn this day Dr. Finkelstein’s deposition was shown to the jury and Kenny Ortega began testifying.

Dr. Finkelstein went on the third leg of the Dangerous tour with Michael Jackson and gave him medication to deal with the pain from his scalp surgery and the neuroma on his head.

No need to repeat it all over again as we’ve just discussed it in the previous post. All I will say is that the medication was given to Michael only when he was in pain as Dr. Finkelstein testified.

Gongaware knew of the problem perfectly well though in his testimony he said he learned of Michael’s dependency from his statement on TV only.

I think I am beginning to understand the logic of AEG bosses. All of them thought Michael to be a drug-addict and regarded the symptoms they saw throughout June as signs of Demerol withdrawal. And since the withdrawal symptoms are generally not life-threatening they chose to completely ignore them.

They cut off his ties with everyone whom they considered possible suppliers of “drugs” and this is probably the reason why Grace Rwaramba had to go. They suspected her to be a supplier.

Through their stereotypes about Michael AEG created for themselves and the people around them a totally distorted image of Michael. They considered him a “junkie” who was “his own worst enemy” and should be therefore controlled all over and held in a “straight jacket”. The reality was absolutely different – he was dying in front of their eyes due to lack of sleep and their own harassment of him and the only thing he needed for survival was a little more understanding and respect.

All this is terribly sad.

Michael used to say to Kenny Ortega, “Change needs to happen within each of us for a change in the world to happen.” These are the words of great wisdom. No changes for the better will ever take place if we don’t change from within.

Since Dr. Finkelstein’s deposition was provided in the previous post I am starting direct with Kenny Ortega’s testimony on the same day:

Monday July 9, DAY 44

1

Outside the presence of the jury, attorneys arguing about whether plaintiff can call Ortega as hostile witness.

2

Judge said he isn’t adverse witness because he had contract with AEG. But judge said it may be a time where she will allow adverse questions

3

Attorney for Jacksons Brian Panish did direct examination.

4

Full name: Kenneth Ortega

5

Ortega reviewed his deposition but did not read testimony given at Dr. Murray’s criminal trial.

6

Ortega said he read some articles about this trial. He also read Karen Faye’s deposition, given to him by his attorney.

7

The director was deposed in the Lloyds of London litigation for several days.

8

Ortega said he had a contract with AEG Live. “I was working in communication with them,” he said.

9

For certain things, Ortega said he reported to Paul Gongaware and Randy Phillips.

10

Ortega said his agent and attorney negotiated his contract with AEG Live. Gongaware represented AEG Live.

11

Ortega said at one point his rep said the negotiation turned from AEG Live to Michael Jackson. He doesn’t know the details, though.

12

Ortega said he has earring loss, so he can’t hear well. He asked Panish to speak up.

13

He said he’s a director, choreographer and sometimes producer. “My role in This Is It, I was Michael’s creative partner in the show.”

14

Ortega said for the creative part, he reported to Michael and to AEG regarding budget or scheduling.

15

Ortega said AEG was Michael’s partner in promoting and producing TII, and they were financers of the project.

16

The director said he was called by Mick Jagger to work on the 50th anniversary tour, working with AEG.

17

Ortega: I believe Mick Jagger just made me an offer and we accepted it. My agent called me, daily offer, I accepted.

18

Panish: Do you consider yourself friend with Gongaware?

19

Ortega: Yes

20

Ortega’s rep dealt with Paul Gongaware in The Rolling Stones tour.

21

Panish: Do you consider yourself friend with Randy Phillips?

22

Ortega: Yes

23

Panish: Do you consider yourself friend with MJ?

24

Ortega: Yes

25

Ortega was originally named a defendant in this case. Panish asked if he knew why he was dismissed from the suit.

26

“I’m not an employee of AEG,” Ortega responded. Ortega said he is from Redwood City, CA, grew up in the Bay area.

27

Ortega said he started dancing when he was 4 years old. There was always music at his house, watched his parents dance.

28

He opened up his own theater company when he was 18. Ortega said around 1963-64, Michael was walking through backstage they made eye contact

29

He looked at me and smiled. I was overwhelmed, Ortega said.

30

Ortega: I was in such awe of him and the brothers. It was such a momentous moment for me, it was like being touched by a star

31

Choreographer creates the dance steps, movements in a stage show or concert or musical, Ortega explained.

32

Ortega said he didn’t do the choreography for the This Is It tour. It was lots of people, some was classic and belonged to MJ for some time.

33

Travis Payne was MJ’s partner for the new choreography in TII.

34

Ortega worked on High School Musical 1, 2 and 3, Dirty Dancing, Newsies, Pretty in Pink, St. Elmo’s Fire, etc.

35

Ortega did choreography for Cher, Madonna, Kiss, Diana Ross, Barbra Streisand, Bette Midler.

36

Ortega has been asked to do a new “Dirty Dancing” but he’s not sure it will happen

37

Panish showed a video clip of Madonna’s “Material Girl.”

38

Panish showed excerpt of it with Patrick Swayze and Jennifer Grey; snippet of “Newsies,” 1st full-length picture he directed/choreographed.

39

Panish showed clip of High School Musical. He directed and choreographed 1, 2 and 3.

40

HS Musical 1 and 2 were released on TV only, 3 was a movie. “It was the number one opening weekend of any musical ever,” Ortega said.

41

Michael and the children went to see High School Musical in Las Vegas.

42

Panish: How did it make you feel?

43

Ortega: (long pause) I’m speechless, I can’t think

44

P: Was that a big thrill?

45

O: Beyond

46

I know for sure Paris was singing, they were all standing and enjoying it, Ortega recalled.

47

MJ went backstage. “The cast, they were just crying, and screaming, and just speechless,” Ortega said.

48

He was very generous, very sweet and kind to everyone, Ortega said about Michael Jackson.

49

Ortega choreographed the 96 Olympics in Atlanta, 2002 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City, Super Bowl half time, World Cup.

50

Ortega: Choreography is about the movement of the human body, technique, dance language, physical, how to instruct

51

Ortega first met MJ in 1990. “MJ called me to help mount the Dangerous Tour,” he said.

52

I felt incredible, he was the greatest performer on the planet and as far as I’m concerned. The greatest song and dance man ever.

53

He said he was co-director of Dangerous with MJ. MJ had a ton of ideas, asked him to realize those on stage.

54

It was exciting, stimulating, awesome, Ortega said.

55

Ortega described Michael Jackson: Musician: world class Singer: one of a kind Dancer: the best

56

Ortega has worked in the industry for over 40 years. Panish asked Ortega how MJ influenced other dancers.

57

Like no one else in his generation, Ortega said. “I think he was the most influential dancer for generations of kids still even today.”

58

Panish showed clip of “This Is It” movie showing the young dancers who had been chosen to dance with MJ and how he influenced them.

59

Ortega: It was primarily Michael’s vision that I shared. He wanted to put on the greatest show that anyone had ever seen.

60

He wanted to rock the world, Ortega said. “He wanted to let them know he was back.”

61

The opening of the show was significant to MJ. He wanted the audience to think how will be able to top that!, Ortega testified.

62

He always wanted something that was world class and thrilling, Ortega said.

63

Ortega helped prepared the opening of the Dangerous tour in 1992. Michael would enter the stage in what they called “toaster.”

64

The “toaster” popped up and gave illusion of flying. Ortega said MJ would then stand still on stage for a few minutes.

65

He would call that milking the crowd, Ortega explained. “He knew how to work the crowd better than anybody.”

66

Panish showed clip of opening of Dangerous. “It was one of the most spectacular openings that anyone has seen or done,” Ortega said.

67

It left people breathless, Ortega said.

68

MJ went to an orphanage in Romania before going to his hotel. Ortega said MJ didn’t want to do the show before the orphanage was cleaned up.

69

MJ wanted to make sure every child had what they needed, Ortega explained.

70

Ortega said MJ wanted to improve the human condition for children around the world.

71

Panish: Did you know Michael was dependent on painkillers?

72

Ortega: No

73

P: Never heard of that?

74

O: No

75

P: To this day?

76

O: No

77

In 1995, Ortega was acting as a consultant to MJ for an event at Beacon Theater in NY.

78

Panish: Did you ever become aware he was not well?

79

Ortega: He was unhappy

80

Ortega: He called me in because he was unhappy with what was going on with his classic choreography, he didn’t want it to be changed.

81

Ortega said MJ fainted and the show was cancelled.

82

Panish: Can we say he collapsed?

83

Ortega: Yes

84

MJ was then transported to the hospital by ambulance. “It could’ve been exhaustion, I don’t know, I don’t recall,” Ortega said.

85

In “HIStory” tour Ortega and MJ were co-creators & co-directors. “We used to call creative jousting,” Ortega described the creative process.

86

Ortega: We didn’t always agree on 100%, we allowed ourselves to have creative joust, to play with the ideas and allowed it to ripe

87

Panish: Was his creativity or demeanor different?

88

Ortega: He was still inspired, raised the bar on himself and on everyone working with him

89

Ortega: The video used for the show would have subtitles saying love one another, take care of the planet, take care of the children.

90

Ortega said he went on first 6 or so dates on both “Dangerous” and “HIStory” tour. He explained it was the normal amount.

91

Panish showed video of “HIStory” tour opening. Ortega said MJ wanted his music to inspire change in the world.

92

Greatest example of it is Man in the Mirror, Ortega said. “Change needs to happen within each of us for a change in the world to happen.

93

Ortega said the song “What About Us?” showed Michael’s deep concern about healing the planet. “And that went deep,” Ortega said.

94

Ortega talked about shows that MJ did for charity.

95

Panish showed clip of Earth song.

96

Ortega: In Munich, Michael was on a set held up by cables. During the big conclusion of Earth song there was a bridge supposed to float down

97

Ortega said because an improper cable replacement, the bridge came down faster that it was supposed to.

98

I know he hurt his back, Ortega said. MJ jumped up and went back on the stage. “The show must go on.”

99

Ortega said he thinks MJ had back problems afterwards. But the director said he never saw MJ take medication.

100

P: Loopy?

101

Panish: Did you observe MJ different after seeing a doctor?

102

Ortega: Yes

103

P: Please explain

104

O: Off, a little off

105

O: Yeah

106

He was a little… off, loopy, Ortega said.

107

Panish: Did anyone tell you they thought MJ was ‘assisted’ with something?

108

Ortega: No

109

Ortega: The scalp burn, I didn’t know he was taking medication for it, I knew he was injured from the Pepsi commercial.

110

Ortega said TII was going to be in London and there was hope for international tour.

111

Ortega: If the show were to go on to other countries, then I would receive royalties, yes

112

Ortega said Paul Gongaware and John Meglan were the ones who contacted him about being part of the TII tour.

113

Email on Feb 10, 2009 from Gongaware to Ortega was the first email the director remembers about the TII.

114

Ortega said MJ kept referring to the tour as “This Is It,” so Ortega suggested the tour should be called TII.

115

At this time, Ortega was working on development of movie for Paramount, “Footloose” remake. He was going to direct it.

116

At times, Ortega said he can work in multiple projects, but once one takes off he needs to be exclusive to it.

117

Ortega said Randy Phillips never told him what happened before the TII press conference with Michael Jackson.

118

He said had he known, it would have had an impact on whether to go forward with TII.

119

I didn’t know anything had happened and I wasn’t there, so there wasn’t anything to be surprised about, Ortega said.

120

Honestly, I didn’t even know if it was for sure, Ortega said. He testified in his depo he was surprised Phillips didn’t tell him anything.

121

Email on 3/12/09 from Gongaware to Ortega: Blew out 30 shows today on the presale. Hot doesn’t begin to describe it

122

Ortega responded: “I’d say we are off to a good start. Congrats to all at AEG see you soon”

123

Gongaware responded: We stopped at 50 sold out shows at the O2 arena. Demand was there for another 50. This is history and you’re part of it

124

Ortega responded: Yeah! Good for MJ, God knows he’s been out through as much negative as any one person should have to go through.

125

Ortega cont’d: Great news, I couldn’t be happier for the Team.

126

Judge adjourned trial until tomorrow at 1:30 pm PT. Ortega ordered to return then. Attorneys remained in court discussing exhibits.

127

Panish said defendants have 14,000 exhibits on their list, down from 28,000. There are 1353 documents produced by Kenny Ortega.

128

For the latest watch @ABC7 and go to http://www.abc7.com . We hope to see you tomorrow for full coverage of the trial. Good night everyone

Alan Duke is giving a fairly accurate report of the above adding information about Dr. Schnoll’s testimony and the mystery of Frank Dileo’s computer:

Director of MJ’s comeback show takes stand

By Alan Duke, CNN

July 9, 2013 — Updated 1601 GMT (0001 HKT)

Los Angeles (CNN) – Kenny Ortega, the director of Michael Jackson’s aborted comeback show, began his testimony Monday about what AEG Live executives did and said in Jackson’s final days.

His first hours on the stand Monday afternoon were spent discussing Jackson’s creativity, saying his voice, songs and dancing were “like no one else in his generation.” He will return Tuesday to resume his testimony.

Lawyers for Jackson’s mother and children argue in the wrongful death trial against AEG Live that those executives ignored warning signs about his health and mental condition that, if heeded, could have saved his life.

The lawsuit contends the promoters hired, retained or supervised Dr. Conrad Murray, the physician convicted of involuntary manslaughter in Jackson’s propofol overdose death.

AEG Live lawyers argue that Jackson — not their executives — chose and controlled the doctor, who was giving him nightly infusions of the surgical anesthetic in a desperate search for sleep in his last two months.

Ortega, who knew Jackson well and worked with him closely preparing his “This Is It” shows, sounded a warning to AEG Live CEO Randy Phillips in an e-mail on June 20, 2009 — five days before Jackson’s death — that Ortega did not think the entertainer would be ready for the shows.

He described seeing “strong signs of paranoia, anxiety and obsessive-like behavior” with Jackson. “I think the very best thing we can do is get a top psychiatrist to evaluate him ASAP.”

Expert: MJ was ‘drug dependent,’ not addicted

AEG says Jackson was secretive about his drug use, which the company contends was an addiction, so there was no way of knowing what treatments Murray was giving Jackson in his bedroom.

But a drug addiction expert testified last week that there was “not a lot of evidence to support” the belief that Michael Jackson was addicted to drugs.

If he was an addict, Jackson “would be taking drugs that were not prescribed by a medical professional, taking larger amounts than prescribed and have drug-seeking behavior,” Dr. Sidney Schnoll testified.

There was no evidence Jackson ever took drugs that were not given to him by a doctor or that he took more than prescribed, Schnoll said.

The bottles of sedatives found in his home after his death had more pills remaining in them than he would have expected if Jackson was an addict, Schnoll said. This “indicated these were not being taken on a regular basis,” he said.

Evidence shows Jackson sought drugs from a number of doctors, but that was not inappropriate because he needed them “to treat a legitimate medical problem,” including back pain, scalp pain and dermatologic issues, Schnoll testified.

While not addicted, Jackson was dependent on drugs, he said.

The painkillers that forced Jackson to end his 1993 “Dangerous” tour early so he could enter a rehab program were taken to relieve the pain from scalp surgery needed to repair burns suffered when filming a Pepsi commercial, Schnoll said.

The burns left scars on damaged nerves in his scalp, which becomes “excitable tissue” that “can be firing just like the nerve,” he said. The result “can be every painful, like a burning kind of pain — persistent, sharp, shooting kind of pain,” he said. “It’s very uncomfortable and one of the most difficult to treat.”

Pain relief is a legitimate use of opioid drugs and a person can function normally if they are taken under a doctor’s care, he said.

President John Kennedy was opioid dependent to relieve “very severe back pain” while in the White House, he said.

“He did alright as president?” Jackson lawyer Michael Koskoff asked.

“It depends on your political affiliation,” Schnoll answered.

The Demerol injections Jackson got during frequent visits to a Beverly Hills dermatologist between April and his death in late June 2009 were given for legitimate medical reasons, Schnoll testified.

If he were addicted to Demerol — which is a powerful opioid — he would not have gone 43 days between injections, which medical records show, he said.

Jackson also went roughly 13 years — from 1993 until 2008 — without the drug, he said. The doctor conceded under cross-examination by an AEG Live lawyer, however, that a gap in available medical records may be misleading.

Jackson’s use of sedatives was an effort to treat his chronic insomnia, Schnoll said.

If the underlying sleep problem could be resolved, the chances of ending Jackson’s use of the drugs would have been good, he said.

There was no indication that Jackson was addicted to propofol before Murray began giving him nightly infusions of the surgical anesthetic for 60 days leading up to his death, he said.

Unheeded warning signs?

Ortega, in his e-mail to AEG Live CEO Phillips on June 20, wrote that “I honestly don’t think he is ready for this based on his continued physical weakening and deepening emotional state.”

He said Jackson was having trouble “grasping the work” at rehearsals.

Production manager John “Bugzee” Hougdahl wrote in an e-mail to Phillips hours earlier that Ortega had sent Jackson home from a rehearsal that night because of his strange behavior.

“I have watched him deteriorate in front of my eyes over the last 8 weeks. He was able to do multiple 360 spins back in April. He’d fall on his ass if he tried now,” Hougdahl wrote. “He was a basket case and Kenny was concerned he would embarrass himself on stage, or worse yet — get hurt. The company is rehearsing right now, but the DOUBT is pervasive.”

Phillips replied to Ortega: “Please stay steady. Enough alarms have sounded. It is time to put out the fire, not burn the building down.”

By “burn the building down,” he meant pulling the plug on the tour that was set to begin in three weeks, Phillips testified last month. “In a highly charged situation like this, I just wanted to keep things calm until we could have the meeting.”

Phillips met with Murray, Jackson and Ortega at Jackson’s home later that day. While Jackson lawyers argue that meeting was intended to pressure Murray to make sure Jackson was ready for rehearsals, AEG lawyers contend Murray assured producers nothing was wrong.

Phillips testified that he remembered little about the conversation at the meeting and Murray has invoked his constitutional protection against self-incrimination to avoid testifying in the trial. This makes Ortega’s testimony crucial for both sides. 

Hand over evidence or face jail

A related drama could unfold Monday in another courtroom as a judge in Ohio decides if he’ll carry out a threat to throw the widow and daughter of a former Jackson manager in jail for refusing to hand over a laptop computer subpoenaed by Jackson lawyers.

Frank DiLeo, who served as Jackson’s manager decades earlier, reappeared in his life in his last months. He died in 2011. Jackson lawyers want to search his laptop for evidence to support their contention that DiLeo was beholden to the concert promoter and not to Jackson.

His daughter, Belinda DiLeo, refused a judge’s order last week to disclose where the computer was, prompting the contempt of court order. The judge gave the DiLeo’s until Monday to hand it over or face jail. A hearing will be held Wednesday to determine of the women complied with the order.

Jackson changed managers twice in the last three months of his life. In late March 2009, he hired Leonard Rowe — one of his father’s friends — to replace Tohme Tohme, the manager who initially negotiated the deal with AEG for his “This Is It” tour.

Jackson lawyers argue that AEG Live forced Jackson to take DiLeo, who had worked for him off and on for decades, as his manager in May 2009 because they did not want to work with Rowe.

A cache of 5,000 e-mails has already been recovered and a lawyer in Ohio is reviewing them to redact non-relevant and personal information before handing them over to Jackson lawyers.

http://edition.cnn.com/2013/07/08/showbiz/jackson-death-trial/?hpt=en_c2

Tuesday July 10, 2013 DAY 45

Point 122 in the above ABC tweets was marked black and red:

122

Ortega responded: “I’d say we are off to a good start. Congrats to all at AEG see you soon”

Black is what was reported by ABC and red is what was added from the court transcript. The addition of “Congrats to all at AEG” may not be that significant but this is one of those small things which also make Ortega look beholden to AEG and not to Michael Jackson.

And the fact that Ortega’s attorney is being paid by AEG does not help to build up any more trust for him.

I don’t believe many things about Ortega. I don’t believe that he never heard about Michael being to a rehab (everyone heard about it).  I don’t believe him when he talks about his status in the show – he says he was reporting to AEG as they were financiers of the project, but also says that his salary was to be approved by Michael (so MJ was to pay for it and Ortega knows it?).

And I don’t believe him when he says that Michael did not come to the rehearsals for a full week before June 19th. First of all other witnesses said that Michael attended the Forum on June 15, 16, 17 and late in the evening on June18th though he was in a very bad state, and second, Talitha, a faithful Michael’s fans says that she was there and saw Michael on those days.

Talitha is a faithful fan of MJ who followed him to every day of  the rehearsals

Now Ortega is keen to explain why he was so worried about the show and is therefore exaggerating the gravity of the problem. Even Travis Payne said that Michael missed no more than 5 rehearsals all in all. So at this point Ortega is blatantly LYING.

Actually it was Ortega who went to the AEG “high-ups” complaining that Michael was not attending rehearsals, and this in spite of the fact that he should have known that it was not Michael’s duty. And from his answers it transpires that around June 16-18 he confronted everyone with an ultimatum – either MJ comes to every rehearsal or he, Ortega, leaves the show. This is why Michael was imploring him on June 19th not to leave him alone.

At some point Ortega may have become concerned about Michael’s health later the show concerned him much more than Michael.

And one more thing. Karen Faye learned of something terrible that happened on June 18th  connected with Kenny Ortega, and was so distressed by it that the first thing in the morning she sent a message about it to her boyfriend. She managed to retrieve the message from her telephone, but it was never read during her testimony on June 28th as AEG’s lawyers vehemently objected to it. Up to this day we don’t know the text but most probably it was the ultimatum set by Ortega to Michael, which drove him to the terrible condition he was in on June 19th. Karen Faye said that Michael appeared at the Forum on June 18th late in the evening after that meeting looking very scared.

Tuesday July 10, DAY 45

129

Hello from the courthouse in downtown LA. There was only afternoon session today in trial between Jackson Family vs AEG.

130

Katherine Jackson is present in court wearing a black and white polka dot jacket. Director Kenny Ortega back on the stand.

131

Ortega said he didn’t want to change any of his testimony from yesterday. His lawyer drove him home yesterday.

132

Ortega said he’s not familiar with the details of his contract. Ortega chose his attorney for this case, but AEG is paying for it.

133

Panish asked how Ortega would’ve been impacted had he known MJ’s condition on the day of the press conference.

134

P: Less wanting to do it because of MJ’s condition?

135

Ortega: Yes

136

Panish: Less wanting to do it?

137

Ortega: Yes

138

Panish: Because you cared about MJ’s condition?

139

O: Yes

140

Rebbie entered the courtroom. She’s wearing a bright pink jacket, sitting next to Mrs. Jackson.

141

Panish asked if at times Ortega would want to meet with MJ alone. Ortega said yes.

142

In order to get into each other’s head and for me to be in the same page with MJ on where his plans were for the show, Ortega explained.

143

Ortega said he was only involved in the negotiation of Travis Payne’s payment.

144

Panish asked if AEG wanted to do production within reasonable costs. “I think that’s general position of responsible producers,” Ortega said

145

I didn’t discuss financing with MJ, Ortega said.

146

Ortega had not worked with MJ for more than 10 years. In terms of creativity, Ortega said not much had changed between the two.

147

Jackson and Travis were more involved in the actual dance steps and performances, Ortega said.

148

I think Baryshnikov and Michael battled it up to see who could do more multiple 360s, Ortega testified.

149

Ortega said the turns are called pencil turns, and he compared MJ to the famous ballet dancer Mikhail Baryshnikov.

150

My goal was to edit together the pieces to tell a story about what Michael’s goals for the show were, Ortega explained.

151

Ortega said he obviously wanted to make Michael look good, but the intention was to tell the story.

152

Panish showed an email with names of artists who were to be involved in the “This Is It” tour.

153

Ortega said Karen Faye reached out to him, had already spoken with MJ about being part of the crew.

154

Ortega said Bugzee was not the stage manager. He worked under Paul Gongaware as accountant, Ortega explained.

155

I wouldn’t have called him stage manager, Ortega said about Bugzee (Houghdahl).

156

Panish: Did you ask Bugzee to write an email on your behalf?

157

Ortega: Not that I recall

158

Email on March 25, 2009 from Gongaware to Ortega: Kenny, I’m afraid we may not be able to meet your financial requirements for a deal.

159

Email cont’d: I’m totally bummed by this. Couldn’t sleep last night trying to figure it out. We need to move forward quickly.

160

Email cont’d: I know, but I haven’t been able to find a way to make this work. My deepest, most sincere apology. Paul G

161

I remember it had to be approved by Mr. Jackson, Ortega said about the email. He testified he never spoke about money with MJ.

162

Judge asked what “financial requirements” meant to him, and Ortega said it referred to his salary.

163

Not what I expected, but sometimes negotiations take time, Ortega explained.

164

Panish: Were you surprised?

165

Ortega: Was I surprised? No

166

Panish asked if this was a negotiation tactic? Ortega smiled and answered perhaps.

167

Ortega didn’t think the negotiations were dead. He kept working in good faith. Ortega and Payne share the same agent (Julie McDonald).

168

He and Payne continued working without a contract. “It was my hope and in the end we would come to terms,” Ortega said.

169

Ortega: It would all work out and I kept the faith that that would happen.

170

Ortega said he performed auditions for dancers, singers, band and interviewed various people for various designer’s role.

171

Ortega doesn’t know when he signed his contract. Panish showed a copy of Ortega’s contract. It was executed on April 25, 2009.

172

Ortega did not have a written agreement when he did the dancers audition.

173

Ortega Contract: The principal terms and conditions of Employer and Employee’s engagement for the Concerts are set forth in the agreement

174

Contract cont’d: (the “Agreement) between Company, on the one hand, and Employer and Employee, on the other hand, as previously

175

Contract cont’d: confirmed in emails between the parties’ representatives, which such emails are attached hereto as Exhibit “A”

176

Contract: and incorporated herein by this reference.

177

The contract says Ortega could get a total of $1.5 million, plus $100K for each of the five territories and $250K for the US.

178

The concerts were supposed to start in London on July 8.

179

Ortega: Michael and I both wanted to extend our time before opening, so I felt comfortable taking the heat (of postponing it).

180

As a director of the show, I didn’t feel we would be ready for the show’s original dates, Ortega said.

181

Email on 5/19/09 from Ortega regarding the postponement of the show: I’m uncomfortable with the way the release reads at this moment.

182

Email cont’d: I feel strongly that it is unnecessary and misleading to both of the press and fans to suggest things as “staging is from another planet” or “never before seen staging.” We are not doing the Chinese Olympics.

183

Ortega said they were exaggerating, and that he thought the press release was “creatively misleading.”

184

The show got so big, Ortega explained, saying he needed an extra week to get it ready.

185

Phillips is quoted in release that “this is a one-off adjustment do purely technical reasons and we don’t anticipate any further changes.”

186

Ortega met Dr. Murray at the Carolwood home in April or May. He remembers the doctor going to rehearsals once or twice.

187

MJ went to 2 rehearsals at Staples, June 23rd and 24th. Ortega said Dr. Murray was involved in creating Michael’s scheduling for rehearsals

188

It was either Phillips or Paul Gongaware who told Ortega Dr. Murray would be making MJ’s schedule and would help MJ get to rehearsal.

189

Panish: Who was responsible for the content of the show?

190

Ortega: Michael Jackson

191

First it was Dr. Murray and then Randy helped, Ortega said about MJ’s rehearsal schedule.

192

Dr. Murray would give Ortega the schedule rehearsal. Ortega said it was not unusual, but he never had a doctor give him artist’s schedule.

193

Panish: Was there a time you were concerned MJ wasn’t showing up at rehearsals?

194

Ortega: Yes

195

Email on June 23, 2009 from Timm Wooley to Bob Taylor: Changes are structural only: KO has responsibility only for the show content & structure in consultation with MJ. Randy Phillips and Dr. Murray are responsible for MJ’s rehearsal and attendance.

196

Panish asked if Ortega had ever seen a situation where a CEO of a company was responsible for the artist’s schedule/attendance. Ortega: No

197

I just wanted him to come to rehearsal, Ortega said. “In terms of when he came I was willing to structure everything around that.”

198

At some point, it became my number one concern, Ortega said about MJ showing up at rehearsals.

199

There were 4 calls between Dr. Murray and Ortega on June 18. One lasted 30 minutes.

200

Ortega said they were already in rehearsals and the only reason KO would call Murray was to inquire about MJ’s non-appearance at rehearsals.

201

My own frustrations Ortega said explaining Murray was creating the schedule, which wasn’t working. “He was my lifeline so to speak”

202

Panish: Was Michael coming every day to rehearsal in June?

203

Ortega: No

204

Panish: Every scheduled day?

205

Ortega: That I don’t know

206

Panish: Were you ever involved in a show where you called a doctor of an artist when he was not coming to rehearsals?

207

Ortega: No

208

MJ wasn’t showing up at all at rehearsals in June, Ortega testified. “I recall MJ not coming to rehearsals for a period of time in June.”

209

Panish: Remember yourself having serious frustration on June 18th?

210

Ortega: Yes

211

That all we worked, MJ and I, this dream, this goal he and I had, tis desire, was going to fall away, Ortega explained.

212

Ortega said MJ was his directing partner, he needed the artist to get the show on the road.

213

On Jun 19, there were several calls between Ortega and Dr. Murray. Ortega remembers this date because there was an issue with MJ.

214

Ortega’s first phone call was at 11:25 am and MJ was not at rehearsal.

215

Panish: Did you learn they had an intervention?

216

Ortega: I remember there was plan to get schedule in order, it was my feeling we weren’t going to make it, there was plan to make it clear

217

Before June 19, Ortega said MJ hadn’t come to rehearsals for a “good week,” but it could’ve been more.

218

They were supposed to leave for London on July 3, so they has 10-12 rehearsals remaining.

219

On the 19th I had more than a serious concern that the show could go on, Ortega said.

220

Panish: You had serious doubt?

221

Ortega: Yes

222

They were going to rehearse in London as well. As of June 19th, Ortega hadn’t seen MJ for a week or more.

223

On June 19, there was a fitting to take place. Michael showed up but very late, Ortega said.

224

Ortega explained it was hard for him as a director to work like that, so he went to AEG’s high ups.

225

Ortega said on June 19th MJ was cold, shivering. “He was slow at growing into the show,” Ortega explained.

226

Panish: How about balance issues?

227

Ortega: Yes

228

Panish: How about losing weight?

229

Ortega: I had a concern, yes

230

Ortega said MJ complained of back pain.

231

Regarding MJ’s balance, Ortega said there was a period of time it wasn’t as good as it had been.

232

P: Did he seem paranoid?

233

O: Yes

234

Panish: Did he seem lost?

235

Ortega: Yes, on the 19th

236

Panish: Did you think he was communicating with clarity?

237

Ortega: No. For part of the evening. He got better

238

Panish showed an email from Alif Sankey expressing concerns about MJ on June 4.

239

Ortega: The choreographer is not responsible for the artist’s physical/emotional, but if they see something they are to report to director

240

June 13th, Payne wrote an email saying MJ was taking a sick day, per doctor’s order.

241

On Jun 14, Ortega wrote to Gongaware that MJ was not allowed to attend the rehearsals the day, asked about MJ’s nourishment/therapy.

242

Ortega said the intention was to get assistance in trying to help Michael in every way possible so he could go to rehearsal.

243

Court then adjourned. Jury ordered back at 9:45 am PT tomorrow with more Kenny Ortega on the stand. We hope to see you then!

Wednesday July 11, DAY 46

Ortega’s testimony on that day makes it clear that he did threaten Michael that he was quitting show and it was him who suggested that AEG pulled the plug. Whether it happened on June 18th or June 16th we don’t know as Ortega says he does not remember attending the meeting on June 16th.

He also described the meeting on June 20th in more detail. It turns out that the meeting was about him (Ortega) and was an “accusatory” one as the previous night he had sent Michael home from the rehearsal. Murray spoke to him in an angry voice and said that Ortega had no right to not let Michael rearse. He told him to stick to his job and leave a doctor’s job to him. Ortega was shocked and left the meeting sooner than the rest of them. When he was leaving Michael gave him a hug and said he would “take the reins”.

Phillips did not speak much at the meeting and was more like a bystander. Prior to the meeting that day he had spoken to Murray for almost half an hour and was watching this drama now like a director watching his actor perform according to the instructions given.

It seems that Randy Phillips was extremely displeased with Ortega’s sudden U-turn. Up till now Ortega had always been on AEG’s side as he was urging Michael to come and rehearse, and at some point even threatened him by pulling the plug on the show, but when on June 19th he saw what condition they had driven Michael into, he got really frightened and sent him home.

In the eyes of people like AEG this was an impossible weekness, and this is why Randy Phillips described Ortega’s actions as “hysteria”. As to Murray’s performance on that day Phillips was thrilled by it and in an email following the meeting said that it was “fantastic”:

"THE DOCTOR WAS FANTASTIC"

“THE DOCTOR WAS FANTASTIC”

And someone has the cheek to say that this doctor was independent of AEG?

Wednesday July 11, DAY 46

244

Hello from the courthouse in downtown LA. Day 46 of Jackson family vs AEG trial (Week 11) has wrapped up. Kenny Ortega testified all day.

245

Katherine Jackson was present in the courtroom wearing royal blue jacket. Ortega said he didn’t review anything since yesterday.

246

Ortega received a daily rate to work in The Rolling Stones tour. The amount was negotiated/set by his agent.

247

AEG is paying for Ortega’s attorney in this case and he’s getting a witness fee of $35/day.

248

Panish: Pull the plug, is that a term you use?

249

Ortega: Yes

250

Panish asked if Ortega suggested to pull the plug on MJ. Ortega responded: “I may, not regarding MJ, but the show.

251

Panish: Did Mr. Phillips talk about pulling the plug?

252

Ortega: I don’t know if he used that terminology, but we did discuss stopping the show

253

The discussion happened when MJ was absent from rehearsals, Ortega said. The director wrote an email suggesting to stop the show.

254

Ortega said he discussed with Phillips if things didn’t change they might’ve to stop show.”Without Michael I don’t know how we can continue”

255

Panish: Did you use term “pull the plug?”

256

Ortega: I may have

257

About email Ortega sent Gongaware asking if he knew Dr. Murray ordered MJ not to rehearse, Ortega said he wanted to alert AEG about it.

258

Panish: Have you ever been on a show where doctor told artist not to rehearse?

259

Ortega: I think I worked in a show where artists were sick

260

Email on June 14, 2009 from Ortega to Gongaware: Paul, MJ did not have a good Friday and he didn’t show on Saturday. He has been habitually late (the norm). I realize he’s up against a lot. I have ton of love/sympathy for what he’s been through. We must do all that we can as a team to stay on top of his needs everyday. He required more attention and management. As I mentioned I truly believe he needs nourishment guidance & physical therapy (massage) for his fatigued muscles & injuries. He is not in great physical shape. I believe he’s hurting. He has been slow at grabbing hold of the work. We have twenty days we can’t let him slip. I’m doing all I can every day to build up his confidence & to create schedule that will help to ready him and to arrive us at our goals. Every time he is late or cancels it chisels away that possibility. There can be no more calls to Travis asking him to come to the house. MJ needs to be told that it’s time to get real. He must take care of himself so that  he can meet the schedule or there are going to be consequences. We need a healthy, rested and ready MJ at the Forum and Staples for all the remaining rehearsals as well as the few we have at the O2 in July. Thanks, KO

261

Ortega said he just wanted to make sure MJ had all health benefits available to be able to do the show.

262

Email on Jun 14, 2009 from Gongaware to Ortega: Frank and I have discussed it already and have requested a face-to-face meeting with doctor. We want to remind him that it is AEG, not MJ who is paying his salary. We want him to understand what is expected of him.

263

As to Gongaware’s email, Ortega said he didn’t know whether he discussed it with Gongaware.

264

Panish: Would it be fair to say as of June 14, 2009, you thought the show was in jeopardy?

265

Ortega: Yes

266

Panish: Would it be fair to say as of June 14, 2009, everyone was under pressure?

267

Ortega: Yes

268

Panish asked if Payne ever told Ortega MJ looked assisted when coming to rehearsal. Ortega said he doesn’t remember if he used that word

269

Ortega said he understands being assisted to mean under the influence of something.

270

I don’t have any idea in which capacity, but I knew he was, he was introduced to me as his doctor, Ortega said about Dr. Murray.

271

Ortega said he doesn’t recall the conversation with Payne about MJ being treated for sleeping problems. He doesn’t dispute that he may have

272

Ortega: I believe I was under the impression Michael was seeing doctor. I believe when he showed up like that he had been to a doctor

273

I just didn’t need Mr. Payne to make me aware of it, Ortega said, explaining he could see the problems himself.

274

Panish: You saw, at least 4 times, MJ come to rehearsal in a condition you’d describe as under the influence?

275

Ortega: Yes

276

Ortega said he’s not a specialist in drug addiction. Panish asked if he had discussion with Payne about it.

277

Ortega: I don’t recall the conversation, but most likely yes, I’m not disputing his testimony.

278

Panish: Do you know if at this time AEG had sick cancellation?

279

Ortega: No

280

Ortega said he had been insured for big events, like the Olympics. He took physical examination for it.

281

Ortega said Karen Faye, Travis Payne, Alif Sankey, assistants Stacy Walker and James Faris raised concerns about MJ’s physical condition.

282

I don’t think everyone spoke about it, but they were aware and concerned, Ortega said.

283

Ortega and Faye don’t get along on a personal level, Ortega said.

284

I did think she was looking after Michael’s best interests, Ortega said about Faye. She did not keep MJ secluded this time around, though.

285

Michael Bearden was the musical director in “This Is It” in charge of the music. Ortega said he’s top notch, very respected in the business.

286

Panish asked if Bearden was also concerned with MJ’s health. “He may have, yes,” Ortega responded. Bearden is brilliant, successful musician

287

Email On June 16 from Bearden to Ortega: Hey guys! on MJ’s lead vocal re-sings. I’m not sure if we’re going to get what we need in time. I’d like to try to get some alternate takes or un-processed leads from the vault if we can. I can go in with M Prince and re-mix  the stuff we need on the 22nd (our proposed media day). I we can get everything we need from the vault I can use what we have  and take out ad libs and such to try to make it feel new. MJ is not in shape enough yet to sing this stuff live and dance at the same time. He can use the ballads to sing live and get  his stamina back up. Once he’s healthy enough and has more strength I have full confidence he can sing the majority of the show live. His voices sounds amazing right now, he just needs to build it back up.

288

He wasn’t vocal ready yet, not in shape to sing and dance, Ortega said about MJ.

289

Ortega explained MJ was still building back his voice, that’s what Bearden was referring, to have power to sing/dance the entire show.

290

This exchange happened about 18 days prior to opening day.

291

Response on June 16, 2009 from Ortega: I have a 2:30 at MJ’s house today with Frank, Randy, Paul and the Doctor.

292

Email cont’d: I will add your concerns/requests to an ever growing list of items I already plan to discuss w/ MJ. The plan is he’s joining us tonight for band work. How many individual vocals are we talking about? If he put his mind to it, how long would it take?

293

Not necessarily to be done, but things I needed Michael to give his input, Ortega said.

294

Ortega doesn’t remember if he went to MJ’s house on June 16. He’s not disputing he did, though.

295

I would call the meeting on the 20th an intervention, Ortega said.

296

I could’ve had this meeting, but there were just so much going on, I could’ve been there on the 16th, I just don’t recall, Ortega said.

297

Ortega explained he doesn’t remember anyone telling him not to go to the June 16th meeting.

298

Ortega doesn’t recall whether MJ was at the rehearsals on June 16, 17 and 18. He knows MJ was at the rehearsal on June 19.

299

Ortega said MJ arrived at night to rehearse on June 19, probably in the evening around 9 o’clock.

300

I saw a Michael that frightened me, a Michael that was shivering and cold, Ortega said.

301

Ortega: He, I thought there was something emotionally going, on, deeply emotional, thought something physical going on. He was cold.

302

As to his physical condition, Ortega said MJ was shivering, just seemed fragile.

303

Panish: Troubling?

304

Ortega: Very troubling

305

Panish: Skinny?

306

Ortega: Skinny? No, he wasn’t a heavy person to begin with. It wasn’t weight I was concerned on, it was his appearance.

307

Panish: Did it appear he had lost weight?

308

Ortega: Yes

309

I observed Michael like I had never seen him before, Ortega said. It troubled me deeply, he appeared lost, cold, afraid.”

310

Ortega said MJ was coherent. “I think when he first came in he didn’t seem coherent, but when I started talking to him he became better.”

311

Ortega: He seemed to warm up and feel a little better, but he wasn’t well.

312

Panish: Did you feel something was wrong?

313

Ortega: Yes. Not well enough to rehearse

314

Ortega: I was in a room, right off the main room. I think MJ was already in the room. Karen called me and asked me to come in to the room

315

Ortega: No. I didn’t see him in T-shirt, so I wouldn’t know he was that thin.

316

Panish showed picture of MJ’s fitting on June 19th and asked if that’s how he always looked.

317

P: A little emaciated?

318

O: Yes

319

P: What was different?

320

O: His body, he looked very thin

321

Panish: Is that how he always looked?

322

Ortega: No

323

Ortega said MJ was covered when he saw him on June 19th, so he didn’t see him like the photo.

324

Panish: Did you ever seen him like that before?

325

Ortega: No

326

I remember asking for food, I asked if MJ had eaten Ortega recalled. “I remember calling the doctor, I was very upset and I was concerned”

327

I wanted someone who’s a professional to be aware that Michael showed up in that condition, Ortega explained.

328

Ortega: I know that I did my best to provide for Michael. I don’t recall if the doctor ever answered the phone or I kept leaving voicemails.

329

Ortega: We talked, Karen put a heater on the floor, took off his shoes, I began rubbing his feet, he said it felt very good

330

Ortega said MJ told him he never had his feet massaged before. “I couldn’t believe it!” Ortega said.

331

In the overflow room, several fans raised their hands at this point saying they would rub his feet anytime!

332

Ortega said he cut up the salad, Michael ate, they talked and Michael said he didn’t  want to go home, he wanted to watch the rehearsal.

333

Ortega said Michael asked that Travis Payne be on stage and be him, so he could seat with the director and see it.

334

Panish: Do you remember crying?

335

Ortega: Yes

336

Panish: Were you crying because you were concerned with Michael?

337

O: Yes

338

P: Serious concern?

339

Ortega: Yes

340

P: Being a drama queen?

341

O: No

342

P: Overreacting?

343

O: No

344

Panish: And you did everything you could?

345

Ortega: Yes, that I could think about it

346

Panish: Did you try to tell AEG there was a problem?

347

Ortega: I believe you have records of it

348

Ortega said he sent emails to AEG only when he thought it was absolutely necessary.

349

Panish showed email chain “Trouble At The Front”.

350

Ortega took a deep breath. Panish asked him if he was alright. He answered lets keep going, please.

351

Email from Leiweke to Phillips asking to set up a meeting. Then Phillips forwarded the email to KO asking him to be present at the meeting.

352

Ortega: I thought Michael had a problem on the 19th. I wasn’t thinking about the production on the 19th. I was only thinking about Michael!

353

Email on 6/19/09 from John Hougdahl to Gongaware and Phillips

354

Subject: Trouble at the front. Paul/Randy. I’m not being a drama queen here…

355

Email cont’d: Kenny asked me to notify you both. MJ was sent home without stepping foot on stage. He was a basket case

356

Email cont’d: and Kenny was concerned he would embarrass himself on stage, or worse yet – get hurt.

357

Email ends: The company is rehearsing right now, but the DOUBT is pervasive. Time to circle the wagons. Bugzee

358

This isn’t my email, I didn’t ask him to write this email, I asked him to reach out to Paul and Randy Ortega said. “These aren’t my words”

359

I made him aware of the situation, Ortega said about Hougdahl. “I don’t even know I personally said it to him or sent someone else.”

360

Ortega: I didn’t leave MJ’s side until he left. I wanted to be with him, I didn’t want to leave his side.

361

Ortega said he remembers having thoughts at the StaplesCenter and typed his email probably while still there.

362

Ortega said he didn’t respond to the chain of emails, but was only offering his accounting of the day.

363

Trouble At The Front Email:

364

Ortega wrote: I will do whatever I can to be of help with this situation.

365

My concern is now that we’ve brought the Doctor in to the fold and have played the tough love, now or never card,is that the Artist may be unable to rise to the occasion due to real emotional stuff. He appeared quite weak and fatigued this evening. He had a terrible case of the chills, was trembling, rambling and obsessing. Everything in me says he should be psychologically evaluated. If we have any chance at all to get him back in the light, it’s going to take a strong Therapist to help him through this as well as immediate physical nurturing. I was told by our choreographer that during the artists costume fitting with his designer tonight they noticed he’s lost more weight. As far as I can tell, there’s no one taking responsibility (caring for) for him on a daily basis. Where was his assistant tonight? Tonight I was feeding him, wrapping him in blankets to warm his chill, massaging his feet to calm him and calling his doctor. There were four security guards outside his door, but no one offering him a cup of hot tea. Finally, it’s important for everyone 2 know, I believe that really he wants this. It would shatter him, break his heart if we pulled the plug. He’s terribly frightened it’s all going to go away He asked me repeatedly tonight if i was going to leave him. He was practically begging for my confidence. It broke my heart.

366

Ortega began to cry while reading this part of the email.

367

Email ends: He was like a lost boy. There still may be a chance he can rise to the occasion if we get him the help he needs.

368

I’m not ok right now, Ortega said. Judge asked if he wanted a break, he asked for a few minutes. Judge gave a 10-minute break.

369

After the break, Ortega apologized to everyone. Testimony resumed.

370

Panish showed phone records of Ortega where he called Dr. Murray several times on June 19th.

371

Ortega said he doesn’t remember speaking with the doctor. He said he believes he did the best he could to reach him, though.

372

Ortega: I really didn’t know what Dr. Murray did, but Michael showing up in this condition, I had a concern.

373

Panish: Did you have a concern about Dr. Murray at this time?

374

I was concerned about Michael being in this state when he had a doctor, Ortega said.

375

Apologies… exceeded number of tweets again! Here’s more of Kenny Ortega’s testimony today.

376

The doctor in the fold means he was in charge of Michael’s schedule and it involved me, Ortega said.

377

I believe this was something else, it was not the tough love, you have to show up of this is not going to happen, Ortega said.

378

It was real emotional stuff, Ortega testified. “I just felt he wasn’t present, he wasn’t there.

379

Ortega: I’m not a doctor, I just felt there was something going on, more than physical. My response was to have a professional evaluate him

380

Panish: And you had a real concern with Dr. Murray?

381

Ortega: Yes

382

Panish asked if Ortega thought MJ was not being cared for. “Not at the level I’d expected Michael deserved,” he answered.

383

I was not feeding (MJ) literally, I did not feed Michael, Ortega said.

384

Panish: Were you scared about Michael?

385

Ortega: Absolutely in the beginning, a little less in the end, when he was a little warm, better

386

Ortega: I tried the doctor, who I thought it would be the most natural, and then reached out to AEG, Michael’s partners, for help

387

Ortega said he could’ve walked away, and MJ would’ve been left without a director.

388

I didn’t believe it could go forward at this point, at this night Ortega said. “I wanted it for him, I know it was what he wanted for himself”

389

He seems lost, not like the Michael I’d seen, Ortega said. “I couldn’t see his body but his physical presence wasn’t what I had seen last”

390

Ortega said he believes his email was a strong suggestion that MJ needed to be seen by a doctor for his psychological condition.

391

Ortega said he didn’t see Randy until next day, on the 20th, when he was at the meeting at Carolwood house.

392

Panish: Did you discuss with Randy Phillips, 5 days before MJ’s death, about pulling the plug?

393

Ortega: Not that I recall

394

Panish: How would MJ be if show was canceled?

395

Ortega: I know how deeply it mattered to him to do these shows

396

I said I thought it would break his heart, Ortega explained.

397

Ortega said he doesn’t remember an email response from Randy Phillips to his email.

398

Email from Phillips: Kenny, I will call you when I figure this out. We have a person like that, Brigitte, who’s in London advancing his stay

399

Email cont’d: We will bring her back ASAP and Frank, too, however, I’m stymied on who to bring in as a therapist

400

Email ends:  and how they can get through to him in such a short time.

401

Panish: You were not concerned with the business side, but with Michael Jackson?

402

Ortega: Yes

403

Ortega: I didn’t want to break Michael’s heart, I was torn. My instinct was to stop the show, but I didn’t want to break Michael’s heart.

404

Ortega responded Phillips: Randy, I’m at home awaiting your call or instructions. I honestly don’t think he is ready for this based on his continued physical weakening and deepening emotional state. It is reminiscent of what Karen, Bush, Travis and obsessive-like behavior. I think the best thing we can do it is get a top Psychiatrist on to evaluate him ASAP. It’s like there are two people there. On (deep inside) trying to hold on to what he was and still can be and not wanting us to quit on him, the other in this weakened and troubled state.

405

Ortega: He was afraid for one thing I was going to leave him. Anxiety: he was anxious he didn’t want me to leave or quit

406

Ortega: Obsessive behavior: he was repeating for me not to quit or leave him

407

There was no question in my mind that Michael wanted to do the shows, Ortega said.

408

Ortega: ‘There’s nothing to be afraid of, we are going to do this, This Is It.’ That’s the Michael I had allegiance to.

409

Phillips responded to Ortega that he not be an amateur psychiatrist. Ortega said that was not his intention.

410

Ortega said he does not know whether Dr. Murray was ever successful, unbiased and ethical. The director did not check the doctor out himself

411

Ortega didn’t think Dr. Murray was giving good care to MJ.

412

P: Raise a red flag?

413

O: Yes

414

Panish: Do you think you were trying to sound an alarm?

415

Ortega: Yes

416

P: Why?

417

O: Because I was concerned

418

Panish: Were you trying to concern Mr. Phillips about this situation?

419

Ortega: Yes

420

I saw something that troubled me deeply and I felt it needed attention, Ortega said.

421

Ortega: I had seen something deeply troubling and I wanted to be taken seriously.

422

I felt Michael was in trouble and needed help, Ortega said.

423

Panish: If Phillips were more concerned about getting the show on the road rather than MJ, would that worry you?

424

Ortega: Yes, because they were talking about a person’s health, I was more concerned about Michael’s health than anything else at that time.

425

Phillips testified he thought Ortega was entrenched in the situation and not being open minded. Ortega disagreed with Phillips’ perception.

426

I got the impression that Randy would be looking over and investigate himself, Ortega explained.

427

Panish: Did Randy Phillips ever tell you what the problem with MJ was?

428

Ortega: No

429

Dr. Murray, in some capacity, tried to tell Ortega what was happening. But the director never got an answer to what was wrong with MJ.

430

Ortega: I wanted it to be taken care of, whatever it was, I wanted it looked into and taken care of.

431

Panish: In all the time you knew MJ, did you ever see him in the condition he was on June 19th?

432

Ortega: No

433

I just wanted Michael to be ok, Phillips said. He trusted both Phillips and Gongaware.

434

P: Distraught?

435

O: Yes

436

Panish: Do you know how you felt?

437

Ortega: I was stressed

438

Gongaware told Ortega about the meeting on the 20th. Neither Phillips nor Dr. Murray ever told Ortega they spoke on the phone for 20 mins.

439

Meeting on the 20th was between Michael, Dr. Murray, Randy Phillips and myself. It happened at the parlor in the house.

440

Ortega said when he realized the meeting was about him, he stood up to express his feelings.

441

Ortega did not stay very long at that meeting. He estimates 10-15 minutes, definitely under a half an hour.

442

Ortega left by himself. The others stayed: Jackson, Dr. Murray and Phillips.

443

Ortega said Dr. Murray began the meeting. He said he had a feeling the meeting would be about the night before and the depth of his concerns

444

P: Who was accusing you?

445

O: Dr. Murray

446

Panish: Who was the one being accused?

447

Ortega: Me

448

Ortega described the meeting as “accusatory.”

449

Dr. Murray was upset with Ortega, the director said.

450

Panish: Did Phillips ever tell you that he had a phone conversation, for 20 minutes, on June 20th with Dr Murray?

451

Ortega: Yes, through email

452

Ortega said all he’s familiar with is that Phillips had a lengthy conversation with Dr. Murray at some point.

453

Panish: Did you think MJ was in decline?

454

Ortega: Yes

455

Panish; Was he mentally able and stable?

456

Ortega: I certainly didn’t think on June 19th.

457

Ortega said Dr. Murray was angry at him at the meeting, “I was shocked,” Ortega explained.

458

Ortega: I was shocked because what he was saying it wasn’t at all reflecting of what happened.

459

Ortega said he excused himself. Dr. Murray said MJ was fine and could handle all responsibilities for the show.

460

I was flabbergasted! Because I didn’t believe that was possible, Ortega testified, saying he felt hurt, insulted.

461

Panish asked if he was ever treated like that in his long career. “Oh sure!” Ortega responded.

462

Ortega: Have I ever being talked down, hurt, insulted? Yes, so many times I can’t tell you!

463

Panish: Did Michael stick up for you?

464

Ortega: Yes

465

Ortega: He (Dr. Murray) was upset with me, and he said I had no right to not let MJ rehearse.

466

Ortega: Dr. Murray said MJ was physically and emotionally capable to handle all the responsibilities of the performance.

467

Ortega said Dr. Murray told him to stick with his job and to leave the doctor job to him.

468

Ortega testified he asked Michael to explain to Dr. Murray that MJ asked to stay, but the evening was different. And MJ did just that.

469

MJ stood up, gave Ortega a hug before he left. “The doctor suggested that MJ had told him one thing and now was saying another” Ortega said

470

Michael said no, no, no, they were in disagreement too, Ortega said. The director told MJ he only cared about MJ.

471

Ortega said MJ responded ‘I know, I know, I love you, I will take the reins.’

472

Panish: And 5 days later Michael was dead

473

When Michael Jackson showed up at rehearsal on June 23, Ortega said: “It was miraculous!”

474

Ortega: Whatever the flu, whatever it was, it was just not present. I didn’t ask questions, I was just overjoyed.

475

Ortega: Yes

476

Ortega said everyone noticed the drastic change. “I didn’t know anything about any medication.”

477

He had a metamorphosis, Ortega said, in awe. “Pretty extraordinary.”

478

I doubted myself, I remember going did I see something? Ortega said. Michael just didn’t seem the Michael he saw on June 19th.

479

Panish: Do you know if Dr. Murray had stopped giving MJ Propofol?

480

Ortega: I had no idea

481

Earth song was the last song Michael rehearse. Panish asked if MJ did it well. Ortega smiled and answered yes. Ortega takes very deep breath

482

Panish: What happened the next day?

483

Ortega: Michael died (Ortega’s voice cracked a little)

484

I was standing on the stage, waiting for Michael, Ortega recalled. The director said StaplesCenter was like refrigerators, so cold.

485

Panish show video of Earth song. This is the last song he rehearsed, Ortega said. He was bundled up in several layers of clothing.

486

Ortega’s favorite songs are: 1- Man in the Mirror 2- Billie Jean 3- 100 other songs all tied in the 3rd place

487

Phillips was to pick MJ up at the Carolwood house to bring MJ to rehearsal. Obviously, he never showed up, Panish noted.

488

Gongaware called Ortega from the hospital. “Our boy is gone,” Ortega said Gongaware told him.

489

But Ortega said he didn’t believe him. “I said I’m not trusting this is Paul Gongaware.”

490

Ortega said Gongaware told him to sit down. Ortega asked Gongaware to tell him something only the two would know to prove it was Gongaware

491

You have to sit down and get a hold of yourself, Gongaware told Ortega on the phone. “Listen to me, Michael’s gone.”

492

I wanted to believe it was some weirdo calling me, it was a very awkward phone call and I didn’t want to believe him, Ortega testified.

493

Phillips never said anything at the meeting on the 20th, was more like a bystander, Ortega said.

494

Ortega said they never did a full run-through of the show.

495

Ortega believes AEG paid him everything they owed him for the work done. Sony paid him for the musical documentary.

496

Ortega said he believes Sony kept all the film in a vault so the video would not get leaked.

497

Ortega said MJ’s intention was to take the show out to the world one more time and end it in the US. Ortega would get bonuses if that happened

498

Judge asked why he’d get bonus if his job was done. Ortega said it’s like getting royalties, since he was one of the creators of the show.

499

Ortega said MJ had intention to do movies inspired in his songs “Thriller” and “Smooth Criminal.”

500

Panish: How did you react?

501

Ortega: Yes, please!

502

Ortega: He invented music video, the list goes on and on. He raised the bar in every area he worked in

503

Panish asked what was MJ’s background.

504

Ortega said MJ was fantastic songwriter, singer, musician, dancer and also a filmmaker. “We worked together really, really well” Ortega said

505

Ortega recalled they had a chance to work together on “This Is It,” they made 4 short films.

506

Panish showed picture of MJ looking at the viewfinder of the camera used to film movies, Ortega next to him.

507

Anything Michael wanted to do with me I was interested in, Ortega said.

508

Photo of MJ, Ortega and young Prince: Attractive, Ortega joked. “You didn’t show my phone number, but showed my profile!

509

Ortega: Along w/ the way he talked about his mother, the kids were the single greatest blessing, brought the greatest happiness to his world

510

Ortega said MJ gave them Christmas every day of the year. “There was just evidence of fun.”

511

Ortega: He was just there for them, he was concerned about them, he was parental.

512

Regarding the children, Ortega said:  “They loved their father, it was very clear, very evident, it was obvious.”

513

He loved her dearly, Ortega said about MJ and Katherine Jackson. “He cared deeply about her.”

514

Panish said he has no further questions at this time. AEG’s attorney, Marvin Putnam, did cross examination.

515

Ortega said AEG is paying his legal fees because it is their contractual obligation to do so. It’s written in his contract.

516

Putnam referred back to June 19th. Ortega reiterated that he didn’t everything he could that night.

517

Ortega said he had been worried about MJ’s mental state before during the HBO Concerts in 1995. “I thought he was anxious,” he said.

518

No one from AEG was present during the 95 incident. Ortega said it was different from the 19th, though. In 95, he was anxious, unhappy.

519

Ortega explained the 1995 one was the only experience he had with MJ that was similar.

520

Ortega had never seen MJ physically weak like he saw him on the 19th.

521

MJ got better as the night went on on June 19th. “He was just more articulated, in the room, warm, engaged and calmed,” Ortega said.

522

Ortega said the 1st day he met Murray, MJ introduced him as “my doctor.” Putnam asked if MJ said Murray was the tour doctor. Ortega said no

523

Putnam: Are you trying to be evasive?

524

Ortega: No, I’m trying to do my best

525

Ugh!!! Twitter jail again!!! Frustrating, but we want to bring you all the details of the testimony. Please bear with us…

526

Putnam showed Ortega’s phone records on June 19th. There are 2 calls from Ortega to Dr. Murray and 1 from Murray to Ortega, all very short.

527

After the calls to Dr. Murray, Ortega said Michael was eating, they had late conversation, he was rubbing his feet.

528

Ortega: Michael wanting to stay and watch, we went on stage, Travis stood in for MJ, we did pyrotechnics if I’m not mistaken, then MJ left.

529

Ortega didn’t contact AEG himself, but asked someone to do it on his behalf. Putnam asked why he wanted to alert AEG about MJ.

530

Because we were all on the same team, Ortega responded. “I thought we needed to help Michael.”

531

Putnam asked if Ortega understands why Phillips was having difficulty  figuring out what was going on.

532

On one hand, Ortega was saying there was a problem. On the other hand, Dr. Murray said everything was ok. Ortega answered yes.

533

Putnam asked what Ortega thought Phillips and Gongaware felt about MJ: “I felt they loved him,” Ortega responded.

534

Putnam: Any reason to believe they don’t?

535

Ortega: No

536

Putnam: Any reason to believe they didn’t?

537

Ortega: No

538

Putnam: Why?

539

Because of the way that they supported him throughout the entire venture, Ortega said.

540

Putnam said he’s looking fwd to seeing Ortega again in a few weeks. The director has business engagement overseas, won’t be back for weeks.

541

Court adjourned until this morning. Plaintiffs will finish up Taj Jackson and then call Arty Erk — an entertainment earnings expert.

542

Erk is supposed to offer info on how much MJ would’ve earned, mostly from the concert.

If Ortega weren’t the one who initiated all that pressure on Michael during the rehearsals I would even believe some of his present tears summed up by Alan Duke:

Concert director brings tearful testimony to Michael Jackson death trial

By Alan Duke, CNN

July 11, 2013 — Updated 0200 GMT (1000 HKT)

Los Angeles (CNN) – Kenny Ortega choked up with emotion as he read aloud an e-mail he wrote days before Michael Jackson’s death.

“He was like a lost boy,” Ortega read. “There still may be a chance he can rise to the occasion if we get him the help he needs.”

The director of Jackson’s comeback concerts testified for a third day Wednesday in the wrongful death trial of AEG Live, the promoter and producer of the This Is It tour.

“I’m not OK right now,” Ortega told the judge. “Can I have a second?”

Judge Yvette Palazuelos allowed Ortega to go alone into the jury room for several minutes before returning for more testimony.

It was one of several times that Ortega shed tears during testimony that described a weak and paranoid Michael Jackson six days before his death, but a revived Michael Jackson in his last two days. Jackson’s mother, who is suing AEG Live, also cried as she listened to Ortega.

The Jacksons contend that AEG Live executives hired, retained or supervised Dr. Conrad Murray, who admitted to police he was giving the singer nightly infusions of propofol. The coroner ruled Jackson’s June 25, 2009, death was the result of an overdose of the surgical anesthetic, which Murray said he was using to treat Jackson’s insomnia. Murray was convicted of involuntary manslaughter.

AEG Live lawyers argue Jackson chose and controlled Murray, and their executives had no way of knowing about the dangerous treatments he was giving Jackson in the privacy of the entertainer’s bedroom.

But, according to testimony and e-mails, AEG Live execs put Murray in charge of Jackson’s rehearsal schedule after Ortega complained that Jackson had been missing so many rehearsals that the tour was in danger.

Jackson lawyers argued that Murray was influenced by a conflict of interest — created by his arrangement with AEG Live — to continue dangerous propofol infusions to help Jackson rest for rehearsals. He was $1 million in debt and had abandoned his medical practice two months earlier to serve as Jackson’s personal physician for the tour. If he failed to get Jackson to rehearsals, the shows might be postponed or canceled and he would be out of a job, they argue.

Ortega: “I felt that we should stop”

After a poor rehearsal on June 13, 2009, and a missed rehearsal the next day, Ortega expressed his concern in an e-mail to AEG Live co-CEO Paul Gongaware: “Were you aware that MJ’s Doctor didn’t permit him to attend rehearsals yesterday? Are Randy and Frank (DiLeo, another Jackson manager) aware of this? Please have them stay on top of his health situation without invading MJ’s privacy. It might be a good idea to talk with his Doctor to make sure everything MJ requires is in place.”

The AEG Live executives later told him they met with Murray and put him in charge of getting Jackson to rehearsals, Ortega said. The director said he was told that if he needed to know whether Jackson was coming to a rehearsal, he should call the doctor. Ortega was given Murray’s cell phone number, which he said he programmed into his own phone.

After Jackson was a no-show for another week, Ortega had a 30-minute conversation with Murray.

“I was told he was creating the schedule and the schedule wasn’t working,” Ortega testified. “He was my lifeline, so to speak.” Ortega said he was venting his frustrations with Jackson and was “crying out.”

While Jackson showed up on June 19, “he appeared lost, cold, afraid,” Ortega said.

“I saw a Michael that frightened me, a Michael that was shivering and cold,” Ortega testified. “I thought there was something emotional going on, deeply emotional, and something physical going on. He seemed fragile.”

He persuaded Jackson not to go onstage that night because he was afraid he would hurt himself, he testified. Instead, Jackson agreed to watch the rehearsal with choreographer Travis Payne dancing his parts.

Jackson appeared paranoid and afraid, he said. “He was repeating for me not to quit or to leave him. He was afraid that I was going to quit or leave him.”

With just a dozen days left for rehearsals before the touring company moved to London for the opening, Ortega testified, he was worried “that all that we had worked for together, Michael and I — this dream, this desire — was going to fall away.”

Ortega testified that on June 19, he “felt that we should stop” the production, but he was “torn because I did not want to break Michael’s heart.”

Ortega sent a series of e-mails that night and the next morning to AEG Live executives warning that they needed professional help for Jackson.

“There are strong signs of paranoia, anxiety and obsessive-like behavior,” Ortega wrote. “I think the very best thing we can do is get a top psychiatrist in to evaluate him ASAP. It’s like there are two people there. One (deep inside) trying to hold on to what he was and still can be and not waiting us to quit him, the other in this weakened and troubled state.”

Ortega testified that he was called to a meeting with AEG Live CEO Randy Phillips, Jackson and Murray at Jackson’s home on June 20, hours after he sent those e-mails.

Murray angrily confronted him, Ortega testified. “He said I had no right to not let Michael rehearse, that Michael was physically and emotionally capable of handling all his responsibility as a performer and I should be a director and not an amateur doctor or psychologist. I should stick to my job and leave the rest to him.”

Jackson died while under Murray’s care five days later, in a bedroom just upstairs from the parlor where the meeting took place.

“A metamorphosis”

A much different Jackson appeared at the next scheduled rehearsal on June 23. “It was miraculous,” Ortega testified.

“I was overjoyed at his energy, his state of mind, his enthusiasm,” he said. “He had a metamorphosis. It was pretty extraordinary.”

Murray told investigators he stopped using propofol to induce Jackson’s sleep for the two previous nights — after 60 nights of it. Jackson lawyers contend that is why Jackson was revitalized.

Ortega said Jackson appeared to have gotten “real sleep, organic sleep.”

A sleep expert testified last month that someone can recover quickly from heavy use of propofol, which interrupts the normal sleep cycles. All of the symptoms that Ortega saw in Jackson on June 19 suggested Jackson had been deprived of real sleep for weeks, the expert said.

Jurors watched a video of “Earth Song,” the final song Jackson performed at the June 24 rehearsal — his last. “I love this piece,” Ortega said as he watched.

“Our boy is gone”

Ortega was standing on the StaplesCenter stage in Los Angeles the next day when he got a call from AEG Live Co-CEO Paul Gongaware telling him Jackson was dead.

“Our boy is gone” Gongaware told him, he said.

“I think I was in shock,” Ortega said. “I wanted to believe that it was some weirdo on the phone.”

Ortega, who had worked with Jackson on other tours and projects, testified Tuesday that he would have been less likely to agree to direct This Is It if he had known what happened the day Jackson was to appear in London to announce the tour.

AEG Live CEO Randy Phillips testified last month that he “slapped” and “screamed” at Jackson because he was “nerve-racked” on that day, March 5, 2009. Phillips recounted that it was “a miracle” that a “drunk and despondent” Jackson finally appeared at the London event. AEG was hosting thousands of Jackson fans and hundreds of journalists for the anticipated announcement, which was to be seen live around the world.

“I screamed at him so loud the walls were shaking,” Phillips wrote to AEG parent company CEO Tim Leiweke. “Tohme (Jackson’s manager) and I have dressed him, and they are finishing his hair, and then we are rushing to the O2. This is the scariest thing I have ever seen. He’s an emotionally paralyzed mess, filled with self-loathing and doubt now that it is show time. He is scared to death. Right now I just want to get through this press conference.”

AEG Live executives did not tell Ortega about the incident when they approached him days later to direct the show, he said. He would have been “less likely” to accept the job had he known, because of his concern about how the preparation for the tour would affect Jackson emotionally and physically, he said.

Taj Jackson, Michael Jackson’s oldest nephew, returns to the witness stand Thursday morning to continue his testimony begun last month.

The trial, which is in its 11th week, is expected to conclude sometime in August. The Jackson lawyers said they should call their last witness next week, which would be followed by AEG Live presenting its defense.

http://edition.cnn.com/2013/07/10/showbiz/jackson-death-trial/index.html?sr=sharebar_twitter

One of the readers of the article said what most probably all of us think about it:

I am not a fan — I never much liked him … BUT it seems to me everyone used him to not only further their own career but also to help fullfill their own personal agendas (wealth, credibility, etc.. etc..)

This was one big bandwagon everyone so eagerly jumped on – but as the horse pulling it all grew weary and tired… no one cared… instead yelled out “You can do it !” “Almost there!” and did whatever they could – pumped into him whatever they needed to…. to keep him on his two feet.

And now? No one is taking the blame.. but everyone is certainly pointing fingers.
Know what? Opening your mouth now, about things you knew was happening then only proves to many of us >> you did not a darn thing to stop it…..

If I was in this for what ever reason and saw a person being used in this fashion – even if they were my worst enemy – I would of grabbed their hand and taken them out of that for their own good… to save them from themself and friends…. and family and associates… they trusted.

You – them – all of those involved slowly sucked the life out of him…. as you so eagerly tried to suck every bit of anything else you could get… before.. he was unable to give more.

Don’t come here to say you saw it happen and toss us the reasons why you did.. nothing. You still did.. nothing. Go away… go away in shame alll of you that felt what you wanted was worth this person’s life….

He was in the end – just a puppet for all of you…

And it sickens me..

Thursday July 12, 2013 DAY 47

Taj Jackson's wedding

Taj Jackson’s wedding in June 2013

Taj Jackson resumed the stand.

Before his testimony an interesting note was presented to court –Michael wrote: “Tohme away from my $ now. No contact. Where’s my house (underlined twice)”.

So Michael evidently suspected Tohme of embezzling his money and was wondering where is the money he gave him for the house. In this connection it is interesting to recall that approximately at that time Tohme bought a house for himself at some $6mln or so, and later had to return $5mln. to the Estate when it was found that it was Michael’s money.

Taj Jackson says he kept a box of documents from Michael’s bedroom which he passed over to the Jacksons’ attorney early this year. He realized that no one even remembered that he had those documents at all.

He also had two computers from Michael’s home – one with the music, and the other used by the security team. The music computer was given to the Estate, and the security computer was left at Havenhurst house, and he did not see it since then.

Computers disappearing here and there are becoming a trademark feature of this case. It was the computer of the security team! It must have registered everyone who was coming in and out those days! It was invaluable information…

What also struck me is that AEG’s lawyers are so set on compromising Grace Rwaramba that they got themselves into an awkward confusion of taking Nancy Grace for Grace Rwaramba.

Alan Duke said that the laughter in the room did not subside for several seconds:

Lawyer confuses Nancy Grace with nanny Grace in Jackson death trial

By Alan Duke, CNN

July 12, 2013 — Updated 1040 GMT (1840 HKT)

Los Angeles (CNN) – An AEG Live lawyer made an embarrassing mistake in the Michael Jackson wrongful death trial — confusing HLN host Nancy Grace with the Jacksons’ former nanny.

It happened Thursday as attorney Kathryn Cahan cross examined Taj Jackson — Michael Jackson’s oldest nephew — who had just described a close and lovely relationship between the late pop icon and his three children.

Did Taj Jackson think Grace Rwaramba — who served for years as the nanny for Prince, Paris and Blanket Jackson — was “dishonest at times,” Cahan asked.

The judge ordered him to answer, overruling a Jackson lawyer’s objections that the question was irrelevant to the case.

“I have not experienced her dishonesty,” Jackson answered.

Cahan then presented something she apparently thought would discredit Jackson’s testimony, showing he was not being honest. It was a “TwitLonger” message posted online by him on December 11, 2011. TwitLonger is a service that allows users to post longer messages on Twitter.

Taj Jackson was discussing his dislike of journalist Roger Friedman, who he called “anti-Jackson” and a “sneaky snake.”

“Sorry… but there are a couple of people who truly disgust me. And to me, he belongs in the same category as Grace, Dimond, and Bashir,” he wrote.

Does that document refresh his recollection of your opinion of Grace Rwaramba, Cahan asked.

“That’s not the same,” he responded. “That’s Nancy Grace!”

It took several seconds for the loud laughter in the courtroom to subside.

A proud note by Michael about his son Blanket

A proud note by Michael about his son Blanket

Dimond is Diane Dimond, a journalist unpopular with many Jackson fans for writing a book about Jackson’s child molestation trial, and Bashir is the journalist who conducted a series of interviews with Jackson that fans blame for triggering the molestation charges.

Grace Rwaramba — not the TV host — is expected to testify in the next week about her observations of Michael Jackson’s relationship with his children.

If jurors decide that AEG Live is liable for damages in Jackson’s death, they will have to place a monetary value on the emotional loss his children suffered. Two handwritten notes found in Jackson’s bedroom by the family were read to jurors Thursday in an effort to demonstrate the love.

Note from Paris to her father

Note from Paris to her father: X stands for hugs, O for love (or the other way about)

Taj Jackson identified one as the handwriting of Paris, who was 11 when her father died: “Dear Daddy, I love you so much & I’m so glad I got a goodnight hug. Sleep well. I love you and good night. I’ll see you tomorrow. XOX Goodnight. Lots of love Paris Jackson”

The other note was Michael Jackson’s handwriting: “Words of Blanket my son, 6 years young. ‘What’s your favorite letter Daddy? Mine is ‘G’ for God and D for Daddy’ age 6, Blanket.”

Jackson lawyer Deborah Chang suggested the father’s note showed how dedicated he was to his children since he took time to write down what his young son said.

An expert in entertainment economics will be on the stand when the trial enters its12th week Monday in a Los Angeles court. Certified Public Accountant Arthur Erk, who audits the earnings of some of the world’s biggest entertainers, will give his opinion on how much income Jackson would have earned had he not died of a propofol overdose while preparing for a comeback tour four years ago.

Jackson’s mother and three children contend that AEG Live, the promoter and producer of the “This Is It” concerts, was liable for the the negligent hiring, retention or supervision of Dr. Conrad Murray, who was convicted of involuntary manslaughter.

AEG Live lawyers argue it was Jackson, not their executives, who chose and controlled Dr. Murray and that they had no way of knowing about the dangerous propofol infusions he was giving Jackson to treat his insomnia.

http://edition.cnn.com/2013/07/12/showbiz/jackson-death-trial/?hpt=hp_t2

Taj Jackson’s testimony:

Thursday July 12, DAY 47

543

Session has started this morning. The attorneys are discussing with the judge whether to allow jurors to see some hand notes MJ wrote.

544

Side note: Yesterday, some fans brought flowers for Mrs. Jackson. They were not allowed to give them to her, though.

545

However, this morning Mrs. Jackson thanked the fans for the flowers and hugged them.

546

Judge is now in her chambers waiting for the attorneys to talk amongst themselves to see if they agree on a resolution.

547

@luv2dance73 We don’t know yet if Dr. Murray will take the stand. If he does, it will probably be in the defendants case in chief.

548

Photo shown to the jury of Michael Jackson looking at the viewfinder of a camera, watched by Ortega. pic.twitter.com/uIhfIJ2hP2

549

Kenny Ortega and Michael Jackson. pic.twitter.com/yaf9OLu6dg

550

MJ, Ortega and young Prince. This is the profile photo Ortega joked about it saying he looked “attractive”. pic.twitter.com/lSgab2MgGh

551

Katherine Jackson is present in a bright coral pink jacquard jacket. Taj Jackson is about to take the stand.

552

The judge reversed her earlier decision not allowing Jacksons to show the handwritten notes based on hearsay.

553

Jacksons’ attorney Debra Chang successfully argued that the notes would be admissible under state and federal evidence code 1250.

554

Chang said there’s an exception if it reflects a feeling, emotional or physical reaction. Judge agreed.

555

One note reads: Tohme away from my $ now. No contact. Where’s my house (underlined twice)

556

Jury entered the courtroom at 11:20 am PT. Judge apologized to the jury for keep them waiting so long.

557

Deborah Chang, attorney for the Jacksons, doing direct examination.

558

Judge said the attorneys had to discuss issues that takes some time.

559

Taj: Some people would argue we were his (MJ) children before he had his children

560

He was definitely our mentor, everything we did in life we kind of geared to what he was doing, Taj explained.

561

Taj said he has several handwritten notes from MJ that he saved as keepsake.

562

Note MJ wrote: Taj, I love you all and am proud of you. PS. please rehearse

563

Taj said it is written in a Neverland stationary, has the logo at the bottom.

564

He wrote various notes to me like this, Taj said. “That was probably from my mom telling him we were not rehearsing that much.”

565

Taj was the piano player. MJ bought him his first instruments.

566

Note MJ wrote Taj. pic.twitter.com/RMBOrB1oOk

567

Chang showed a picture of MJ getting his Hollywood Walk of Fame star. Taj and TJ were present. pic.twitter.com/atWi9ndKgG

568

Taj said MJ would ask him to watch his kids when he needed. He was also in charge of MJ’s storage.

569

It would be foolish not to ask his advise, Taj said, explaining they could, and would, ask anything they wanted.

570

He picked out a lot of our songs, some we didn’t like that much and he told us why they were important, Taj testified.

571

Taj: He was a perfectionist when it came to his craft. He would study, study, study, and tell us to study the greatest, top 10 singers.

572

The demo sounded a little old fashioned, we couldn’t hear what he was hearing, Taj said about “I Need You” song.

573

Taj said they were recording down the street from MJ’s recording studio. His uncle lent his voice to the end of the song.

574

Taj: What’s most amazing, it was all in one take, he didn’t try again, all you hear was all in one take

575

The song “I Need You” was a success for them. Chang played a snippet of the music video. MJ was not part of it, just his voice.

576

We were always trying to do what our uncle was doing, Taj said, mentioning the choir in the song.

577

Taj said MJ would tell him ‘you have to carry on the legacy, carry on the torch when I retire.’

578

Michael taught Taj and his siblings to listen to the same music several times and hear different instruments each time.

579

I don’t want to give out too many secrets, Taj said, laughing.

580

Taj: For him it was about studying, that’s what we learned as well. I started at 12 years old, but didn’t start 3T until I was about 19.

581

Taj said he and MJ share their mutual love for music and movies. They would watch it in different ways, once without sound, then with sound.

582

It was kind of intimidating to me, Taj said, since he didn’t know much about movie and said he needed to learn a lot to become a filmmaker

583

Taj said the robot transformer in the “Moonwalker” film was in their honor, because they loved the transformers.

584

He was constantly studying and reading about directing, he knew it back and forth and would test us, Taj said.

585

MJ hired a USC professor to teach him movie directing. Taj said the children also learned from the professor.

586

Taj said MJ loved King Tut, he loved Egypt, egyptian culture.

587

MJ wanted him to study 3D, Taj said, since he loved the technology and wanted to do things with it. He wanted Taj to master it.

588

Captain EO was directed by Francis Ford Coppola and is playing at Disneyland. It’s a 3D science fiction film with MJ’s music.

589

Taj said he would stay with his uncle weeks at times. He said he lived at Neverland for about a year, majority of times with his uncle.

590

Taj said he witnessed MJ writing notes to himself. He said he learned it from his uncle and keeps notes himself nowadays.

591

He liked to conduct meetings usually over the phone, Taj said. MJ would keep the phone on speaker so Taj would learn the business dealings

592

Taj estimated over 100 meetings over the phone, probably over 20 in person.

593

Michael believed in “What you conceive, you believe, you achieve,” Taj testified.

594

Taj said MJ would write down his ideas and what he wanted to achieve. He would see his uncle write on anything he could write.

595

Chang showed picture of a mirror with several notes hang on it. “Michael was very sentimental,” Taj said.

596

Taj said MJ kept several items as mementos. Taj ran through a window at Neverland when he was 3 and MJ kept the blanket he was wrapped in.

597

Taj explained the system MJ had in his life.

598

Types of Documents

599

1- Inspirational (“Law of Attraction”)

600

2- Loving Keepsakes (notes)

601

3- “To Do” Topics to Cover During Meetings to Have Others Do

602

Taj said after MJ died he went to Carolwood house to collect some of MJ’s belongings. He said he wanted to keep them for his cousins.

603

Taj said when his mother died, he lost a lot of things either in storage or they were auctioned off and it was very painful for them.

604

Taj retrieved a box of documents from MJ’s storage. The attorneys stipulated some of the notes were MJ’s handwriting.

605

Judge then broke session for lunch. Testimony should resume within 30 minutes.

606

Picture of Taj, his siblings and his late mother, shown to the jury last time Taj testified. pic.twitter.com/EjLFhc9sM3

607

Photo of Taj and Michael Jackson at Neverland in a roller coast. Also shown last time around. pic.twitter.com/27L50Hhjg2

608

Taj’s wedding picture pic.twitter.com/xdFX6wRShB

609

Another note Michael Jackson wrote Taj. pic.twitter.com/Wz5gRLFG5C

610

Taj kissed his grandmother Katherine shortly before taking the stand in the afternoon.

611

Taj said he’s familiar with Paris’ handwriting, has seen her doing homework.

612

Note from Paris to MJ: Dear Daddy,I love you so much & I’m so happy I got a goodnight hug. Sleep well, I love you & good night. I’ll see you tomorrow! XOX, goodnight and lots of love.Paris Jackson

613

Here’s Paris’ note, shown to the jury. pic.twitter.com/VYPBPfoCDw

614

Words of Blanket my son 6 years young

615

Note Michael wrote to himself: Age 6. Blanket. What’s your favorite letter Daddy? Mine is G” for God and “D” for Daddy”

616

Here’s MJ’s note about Blanket. pic.twitter.com/aKHqohrg9j

617

That ended Jacksons side questioning of Taj. AEG attorney, Kathryn Cahan, is doing cross examination.

618

Taj said he was the one family member who spent the most time with MJ (out of his cousins and extended family.)

619

Taj visited MJ in every tour he did: Triumph, Victory, Bad, Dangerous and HIStory. He stayed at the hotels with MJ’s, went to his room.

620

Cahan: Did you ever see any signs of MJ using drugs?

621

Taj: No

622

In 2008, MJ was living in Las Vegas. Taj saw him regularly during that time. “He was definitely happy and healthy, yes,” Taj testified.

623

Taj said that after living in Neverland, MJ went overseas and then to Las Vegas. Taj saw MJ maybe twice, when he was at the Bel Air Hotel.

624

Taj said he never saw MJ use drugs. “I didn’t even know he had moved,” Taj said about MJ moving in to Carolwood house in 2008.

625

The last time Taj saw MJ alive was in May of 2009 during his grandparent’s 60th anniversary party. He never went to the Carolwood house.

626

Taj said that when they learned MJ was going on tour, they stayed away and gave him space. They knew they could be a distraction for MJ.

627

I know MJ was on the phone once to stop an auction, Taj said. Call wasn’t to Taj though, he doesn’t recall talking to MJ on the phone.

628

Taj heard MJ was recording an album for the news or family members. The album started in 2008, Taj said.

629

He was constantly recording and writing, Taj said. “He juggled a lot of things.”

630

Taj: There were very few people my uncle trusted.

631

Taj said MJ wanted to put the storage facilities in Taj’s name.

632

Taj: He had been betrayed his whole life. He knew he could trust me and if something happened to him I would do the right thing.

633

Taj said his mom did the same thing, put her valuables in a safe. However, his mom’s possession in the storage locker were auctioned off.

634

Taj: A company sued our family for not performing at a certain event and they put a lien on the storage.

635

Taj: The storage unit got tied up and unfortunately we became the victims of it.

636

Taj said MJ had sentimental things in the storage that he wanted to keep for his children.

637

Taj said the storage was full with stuff from Neverland. It had furniture, arts, arcade games.

638

MJ had 2 storage lockers. One in Vegas is half of the size of the courtroom (30×37 feet) and the one in Buellton was at least 4 times bigger

639

Cahan asked if Taj was being paid to take care of MJ’s storage. He said at first he didn’t want to get paid, but MJ insisted.

640

Everyone else is making money off of me, I want to take care of my family, Taj said MJ told him.

641

Taj said he doesn’t think MJ wanted to live at Neverland again. “It felt violated in a way, the purity of it. It didn’t feel the same.”

642

Taj doesn’t know when he went to Carolwood house. Rebbie and her daughter, Janet, Katherine, possibly Trent and 1 of his brothers were there

643

It’s a time I’d rather forget, Taj said.

644

Taj doesn’t remember seeing La Toya that day.

645

Taj testified the house seemed normal, not messy. Taj went to MJ’s bedroom on the second floor.

646

Cahan asked if MJ was messy. Taj said he wasn’t trying to defend his uncle, but understood him.

647

When you travel a lot, living out of luggages, it’s messy, Taj testified. “It looks like my place now,” Taj said, laughing.

648

Taj doesn’t remember who handled him the box. It was a cardboard storage box.

649

Taj: The idea of going there was to preserve the stuff. It’s something someone can sell on eBay for hundreds of thousands of dollars

650

He said it could be seen it was documents, that he threw in some stuff as well, but 95% of the stuff was already in the box.

651

Taj said he only stayed in his uncle’s master bedroom, closet and bathroom.

652

The box was given to me in the master bedroom, I just assumed the documents were from that area, Taj said.

653

It was traumatic enough to be in that room so I just wanted to get out of there quickly, Taj recalled.

654

Taj said he received a computer for safe-keeping.

655

Taj took the box to his house. He said he skimmed through some of the documents. This was in the Summer of 2009.

656

Taj turned over the box of documents to Sandra Ribera, one of the Jacksons attorney early this year.

657

The lawsuit was filed in 2010, Cahan said. Taj: “I don’t even know they remembered I had the box.”

658

I protected that box with my life, Taj said. He kept it hidden in his closet of his house.

659

He turned over the entire box to his lawyer. Taj said he was given two computers from the Carolwood house.

660

One was a computer with music, one was a computer used by the security team, Taj said.

661

Jeffrey Phillips, business partner of my aunt La Toya, gave him the computers, Taj said. He was at the Hayvenhurst house.

662

He handed them to me, Taj said. They were MacTowers. Taj is not sure whether he got the screen as well or not.

663

Taj: It was known Estate was looking for music for MJ’s new album. I’m assuming Jeffrey knew I was helping Estate out in that aspect of it.

664

Taj is still working with MJ’s Estate.

665

Taj: I turned 1 of them on, it had music files. Turned the other one on and had log in request, with Mr. Amir’s name, asking for a password

666

Taj could not access it, since he didn’t have the password.

667

The Estate was looking for 4 hard drives with music in it, Taj said. He thought that’s what was being given to him.

668

The music computer was given to the executors of Michael’s estate, Taj said.

669

Attorneys in the hallway said judge asked for it because she wanted to know why they were spending so much time on the computer issue.

670

Judge said the computer stuff had already been litigated during pretrial.

671

Taj said he called Michael Amir Williams but the password he gave him didn’t work.

672

Michael Amir said there was no music in that computer. The Estate, thus, was not interested in the security computer.

673

Taj said he left the security computer at Hayvenhurst house. He hasn’t seen the computer since.

674

After “TII” tour ended, MJ and Taj would make movies. “I think when TII ended, he would’ve shifted his focus to films primarily,” Taj said.

675

MJ’s son, Prince, was going to make movies with them too. “I’m sure more powerful people would be involved too, not just us,” Taj said.

676

His last words to me: After this, we’re doing films, Taj recalled.

677

Cahan asked if MJ ever told him he wanted to partner with Kenny Ortega, not him, to make “Thriller” 3D movie.

678

Taj: I’m sure he would partner with, he wanted to partner with Peter Jackson at one point. I wasn’t exclusive to him

679

The last 3T album was in 2003. “We dropped everything after Michael passed to be with his kids,” Taj explained.

680

Code Z was kind of my homage to my uncle, Taj said. “We did kind of zombie tribute to him.” It was a fake trailer, not made into movie yet

681

Taj said he was planning to go to London to see his uncle Michael performing.

682

MJ had his own record label, MJJ. Taj said MJ was concerned in putting 3T under his label in case something went wrong they would blame him.

683

Taj has spent a lot of time with MJ’s children after his passing. “We’ve been a unit,” Taj said.

684

Cahan: Has Debbie Rowe gotten back involved with the children?

685

Taj: Yes

686

She started a relationship with Paris, that’s as far as I know, Taj said. Rowe is Prince and Paris’ biological mother.

687

Plaintiffs asked for sidebar since judge ruled that no parentage question were to be asked. AEG said Debbie Rowe is the kids’ biological mom

688

Judge read admonition to jury. She said there was a question regarding the status of Debbie Rowe’s relationship with the children.

689

Judge said they are only to consider the relationship between Michael and the children when assessing damages, if any.

690

@tajjackson3 is Taj’s twitter account. Cahan asked Taj if he thinks Grace Rwamba is a truthful person. “Yes,” Taj answered.

691

Grace Rwamba was the children’s nanny.

692

Cahan then showed Taj a tweet he sent in 2011. “That’s not the same Grace,” Taj said. “That was Nancy Grace!” Everyone started laughing.

693

Taj was excused, may be subject to recall.

694

Cahan said she has no question at this time.

695

Here’s the tweet Taj wrote: http://tl.gd/elui5j

696

Plaintiffs then called his next expert witness, Arthur Erk. He’s a CPA for Citrin Cooperman, partner in the firm in New York.

697

Erk is in the entertainment group, handle finances for entertainment. “Music happened to be my particular specialty,” Erk said.

698

Erk said they have 10 sports clients in football and baseball. He became a CPA in 1978.

699

Erk described his extensive background in the industry. He has worked with rock back Kiss, did royalty audits.

700

I was retained to calculate MJ loss of future earning capacity due to his untimely leave, Erk said.

701

The categories in Tier 1 that Erk analyzed was Touring, Merchandising, Sponsorships and Endorsement, Las Vegas and Royalties.

702

For all the latest, watch @ABC7 and go to http://www.abc7.com . Hope you have a great weekend! See you all on Monday!

703

Judge adjourned session until Monday at 10 am PT. Erk is ordered to return. There will be no session tomorrow, a jurors asked the day off.

704

MJ wanted to have a team show in Las Vegas based on Neverland. Erk calculated its earning, use of music for royalties.

Ortega’s testimony on July 9, 2013 from TeamMichaelJackson:

Ortega’s testimony on July 10, 2013:

Taj Jackson’s testimony:

http://teammichaeljackson.com/archives/8964  (Please support TeamMichaelJackson to provide future transcripts)

Some more pictures from the trial:

Taj Jackson attended the Walk of fame ceremony

Taj Jackson attended the Walk of fame ceremony

 

 

3T with their mother Dolores

3T with their mother Dolores

Taj with Michael in Neverland

Taj with Michael in Neverland

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Filed under: AEG THE HORRIBLE, Jacksons vs. AEG Tagged: AEG, Dr. Finkelstein, Kenny Ortega, Michael Jackson, Taj Jackson

News of week 12 at the AEG trial. AMAZING BUSINESS

$
0
0

Here is a summary of July 15-17, 2013 at the AEG trial and the testimony of the Jacksons’ expert witness Arthur Erk who was to estimate Michael Jackson’s earning capacity had Michael been alive.

Arthur Erk is no novice to this business as it was him who was hired by John Branca to assess the value of the Beatles catalog when Michael was planning to buy it. Erk’s estimation was $40mln while the seller estimated it at $49 million.

Arthur Erk said that in this case he reviewed AEG’s contract, emails, budget and other papers including contracts with Karen Faye and Kenny Ortega. Let me note that Ortega’s contract provided for royalties for his part in the tour in case it was taken to various parts of the world and Karen Faye’s contract even stated per diem fees for the countries to which they were taking the show.

Her contract was signed until March 31, 2011 with an option to extend it and this alone meant that Michael’s contract with AEG covered a much longer period than the initial 50 shows until March 2010.

Erk used the average price of tickets from 5 top grossing tours (of other artists as I understand) and estimated it at $108,8. However considering that Michael was the King of Pop the price could have been much higher (and then there would have been no need for Michael to do so many shows to reach the same sum).

Erk’s testimony provides so many figures that I will not even try to go into them and tell you only the one that I managed to grasp – Michael was to earn more than $1 billion after 37 months of doing 260 shows.

At first the number of shows and possible Michael’s earnings presented by Arthur Erk looked stunning to me, then I began to look at them seriously and finally they made me laugh – only not the numbers themselves but the irony of the situation we’ve found ourselves in.

The irony is in the fact that in 2009 it was AEG who was overjoyed by the opportunity to force Michael into a maximal number of shows, and now it is Jacksons’ lawyers who are taking advantage of AEG’s maximal numbers. Instead of disputing the validity and terms of the AEG contract the Plaintiffs decided to take it as it is and are simply turning it against AEG now.

AEG wanted to have a worldwide tour with Michael Jackson and planned at least 186 shows in 27 months? Okay, let it be the basis for the calculation of the number of shows Michael was to do and the money he was to earn following AEG’s own plans.

AEG was forcing Michael into more shows even after December 31, 2011 and set various conditions for him so that he couldn’t get out of the deal? Well, then Arthur Erk will simply add the respective number of shows for the extended period of time and increase their number from 186 into 260.

This way the more shows AEG wanted to have at that time, the higher will be the bill for Michael’s earnings Arthur Erk will present to AEG now. And AEG cannot even remonstrate – in their hunger for money they wanted to eat as much as they could only swallow, so they planned a crazy number of shows and are now reaping what they have sown themselves.

The fact whether Michael could or couldn’t perform this crazy number of concerts is not even the point – what was good enough for AEG then is good enough for the Jacksons’ lawyers now, and if AEG thought that he could perform, it is okay for the Jacksons’ lawyers too. Because the other alternative is even worse for AEG – if they knew that he was frail and could not perform then why did they plan so many shows and make a contract with him at least until December 31, 2011?

The date of December 31, 2011 is stated in the Definitions attachment to the AEG contract and for seeing AEG’s further plans for Michael after that date I suggest looking at two points of this attachment – the Term and the Territory.

The Territory point is simple – it is the whole world. The shows were planned throughout its “major touring territories”:Territory

The Term was a much more intricate business.

First of all this point said that the Expiration date was through December 31, 2011 which means that the contract was to last more than two and a half years after the tour started in July 2009.

But since even two and a half years were not enough for AEG they forced Michael to take more obligations upon himself.  AEG stated that at their sole discretion (without asking the other side) they could extend the contract until they recouped all the advances. This sounds to us more or less okay except that it makes us wonder how was it possible that MJ would be still unable to recoup the advances after 2,5 years of touring?

Brushing aside this confusing thought we go on reading and find that in order to extend the contract and add more shows to the tour the only thing AEG had to do was sending the Artist a simple notice about the extension. The notice was to be sent prior to December 31, 2011.

A couple more sentences down the text and we are also amazed to learn the Artist was supposed to perform all those additional shows regardless of whether AEG recouped all the advances prior to completion of these shows.

So AEG wanted as many shows as possible from Michael Jackson even irrespective whether he owed them money or not…. They simply wanted to bind him with new obligations for the year 2012 and then force him to fulfill them by threatening with sanctions.

In any case the first 50 shows in 2009/2010 were only a start:

Term 1

Could the Artist stop the tour after December 31, 2011? Yes, he could, but not until the additional shows were fully performed.

To stop the tour Michael had the right to send a “buy-out notice” (nice expression) on or after December 31, 2011 while AEG had already set the additional number of shows prior to that date. Thus a one day difference in December 2011 could mean a whole additional year of work for Michael Jackson.

How many more shows was AEG interested in adding to extend the tour “at their sole discretion” ? As many as possible of course, so why are we getting surprised now that the initial 186 shows estimated by Gongaware by the end of 2011 were turned by Arthur Erk into 260? This number is based on AEG’s own projections stated in the budget, emails and contract papers.

Here is the second part of the Term about the notorious “buy-out” notice which sounds to me like the need for Michael to buy himself out of the AEG’ enslavement:

Term2

Let me stress it again – the matter whether Michael Jackson was or wasn’t able to perform this dreadful number of shows is not the point. The point is that AEG thought this number of shows possible and they were intent on making Michael perform all of them.

What can AEG answer to that? That their contract which serves as the basis for this estimation is not valid because it was a cut-and-paste job? No, they can’t say that, because it will make things only worse.

Can they say that Michael Jackson didn’t want to do so many shows? Yes, they can, but their own contract says that the additional number was to be set solely at their choice, without asking for Michael’s permission, and this makes it clear that Michael’s consent never really mattered to them.

Can they say that Michael would have never earned that huge amount of money? Yes, they can, but then they will have to admit that they were going to exploit the biggest star on the planet for more than three years and pay him peanuts for the job, putting hundreds and hundreds of millions earned by him into their pocket.

Now I agree with the Jacksons’ lawyers that closing our eyes on the deficiencies of the AEG contract is a much better strategy than disputing it. You simply take this contract at its face value and turn it against them beating them with their own weapon.

As a result of it we find ourselves in a unique situation where the roles of AEG and Michael Jackson have reversed into the exact opposite from what they were in 2009.

At that time it was AEG who told everyone that the tour would be a bonanza for Jackson, and now it is Jackson’s lawyers who are saying that it was a goldmine.

Faced with the need to pay big damages AEG will probably even tell us some truth now and admit that they were to pay Michael peanuts and were going to grab the remaining billion estimated by Erk themselves – these days money matters to them much more than their reputation which is ruined anyway.

In short all of it is amazing. The parties have swapped their roles and everything is upside down.  Even a Hollywood scriptwriter wouldn’t be able to come up with a scenario like that.

When the Heavens laugh they laugh in a unique way.

Monday July 15, DAY 48

1

Hello everyone. Day 48 of Jackson family vs AEG trial has just concluded. Plaintiffs’ expert witness Arthur Erk was back on the stand.

2

Katherine Jackson was in court for the morning session, but not for the afternoon.

3

Side note: Judge Yvette Palazuelos got a hair cut. :-)

4

Erk explained business management, paying bills, intellectual property.  A master recording is when artist records track in studio, Erk said.

5

Songwriter completes a song, Erk said. A self-published individual will write notes and lyrics, sends to copyright office in Washington D.C.

6

Use license exists whether it is artist on internet who is not signed by a record label or record company, Erk explained.

7

Royalty calculations have not changed, he said, only distribution. Technology advances have changed the industry, Erk testified.

8

Erk: For artist to release song must go to publisher of songwriter or major publishing company to exploit this particular songwriter’s song.

9

The publisher gets 50 cents for every song and artist gets 50 cents, Erk said.

10

He explained the formula radio stations use to calculate and collect over the air royalties

11

In a Print, Folio (printed song material) a songwriter gets 10% of price, Erk testified.

12

In Film, there’s synchronization license to get the right to hear the song in the film. It requires a world wide license.

13

Used to be songwriter gives up right and becomes a member of staff, Erk explained.

14

As Business evolved, biz managers became more savvy, writers wouldn’t give up 100% of copyright, would sell 50% still get co-publishing deal

15

MJ was a tried and tested songwriter and artist from the time he was 5, Erk explained saying he differed from other artists who have died.

16

Panish asked if Erk knows some of MJ’s #1 songs. He responded Beat It, Billie Jan, Man in the Middle, Heal the World, Can’t Stop Loving You.

17

Erk explained that to be a Gold album, it must sell 500,000 copies, Platinum is one million and Diamond is 10 million sales.

18

Erk said he charges normally hour rate of $475. He has worked in a little over 200 hours on this case.

19

The expert has done royalty work for Jackson in mid-80’s. In 1983, he did it for “Thriller,” one of the largest selling albums of all time.

20

“When you have that many sales, there is usually money there, that means they didn’t pay according to the contract,” Erk explained.

21

When MJ’s manager John Branca was pursuing the Beatles catalogue, with 4,000 songs, Erk was hired to determine the value.

22

We call it net publishers share, that is amount publisher is left after paying all co-writers and everyone else, Erk said.

23

Erk: It was our job to go to Robert Holmes a Court, Australian billionaire who owned the catalogue. It was a testing of wills.

24

Erk: We valued catalogue at 40 million. He assessed at 49MM, also didn’t want to give up Penny Lane because he had family member w/ that name

25

The deal got done without that song. Erk said MJ was smart enough to keep his own copyrights.

26

Erk: The average male recording is 75 years. MJ lost 25 years of copyright income.

27

Panish: When someone dies, what happens?

28

The longer you live the longer the copyright goes, Erk said.

29

He assessed areas of touring, the movie was going out on tour, merchandise (t-shits, hats), endorsements (ads, might get signage at arena.)

30

Erk also calculated that MJ would’ve done a thematic show and would’ve earned additional royalties on “grand rights.”

31

Erk described his experience in the business. He’s worked with lots of artists, intellectual property, business management, royalties.

32

He said Bravado is largest merchandising outfit company. Erk examined AEG’s budget, which initially called for 30 “This Is It” shows.

33

Erk reviewed depositions, AEG contract with MJ, picture/development deal that MJ signed w/ AEG, trial testimony, Ortega and Faye’s contract

34

He read emails of AEG’s plans, budgets, handwritten notes of MJ’s; read Ortega’s testimony whether MJ would be successful in film industry.

35

The expert said he saw evidence MJ wanted to do shows in Las Vegas and had intention to record future music.

36

Erk assessed a numerical value for possible losses based on extremely conservative estimates.

37

Panish: When you say conservative analysis, why?

38

Erk: Because I used AEG’s budget numbers that I translated.

39

Erk used several emails from Randy Phillips to show AEG’s plans for future tours. In one, Phillips said MJ sold 750K tickets in 5 hours.

40

AEG prepared budgets. One was at $1.45 exchange rate and another at $1.65, since they used British pounds.

41

Erk said AEG determined what the gross revenue would be for tickets, estimated merchandise sales for shows based on 30 shows originally, not 50

42

O2 arena has 20K seat capacity. They sold 750K tickets for 50 shows. Erk said 1.4% of Great Britain’s population bought tickets for the show

43

Panish: How do you assess ticket prices?

44

Erk: We took the top 5 grossing tours and took average ticket price.

45

Erk showed chart with projections of seats they figured would be sold for MJ touring in Great Britain, Central Europe, Asia, Australia and US.

46

He estimated the actual seat projection to be 12.9 million, out of 5.9 billion people, would generate MJ revenue of $452,155,095.

47

Erk said he didn’t consider MJ’s past tour attendance since MJ said This Is It, it was going to be his final tour; he adjusted the projection

48

Erk said MJ’s albums did “quite fantastically” worldwide, sales doubled and tripled around the world.

49

Erk explained that Tier 1 is what is reasonably assured MJ would’ve done, no speculation, very conservative estimate.

50

Tier 1 are top artists: U2, Madonna, Bruce Springsteen, Bon Jovi, Erk said. “MJ is in a class of his own, King of Pop, no one came close.”

51

Billboard is the music industry magazine, which has a top Box Office for concerts.

52

In the top 25 grossing acts in 2009, Paul McCartney had 10 shows but was 3rd grossing, since he had very expensive tickets and big venues.

53

Only two artists were sold out for all the shows in 2009: U2 and Madonna. Billy Joel and Elton John almost sold out, Erk said.

54

Erk calculated MJ’s ticket price average of $108.18. “He’s the top of the pyramid,” the expert opined.

55

Panish asked if the price could’ve been higher. Erk said AEG did not expect this wild demand.

56

Erk: The demand here was so wild, they could probably sell the tickets for a much higher price and still sold out shows.

57

Total Projected Economic Damages: $1,511,182,374 billion for MJ’s loss of economic earning capacity based on $200 ticket minus MJ’s expenses

58

Total projected income based on $108.18 ticket price: $1,261,745,023

59

Outside the presence of jury, Judge Palazuelos told audience that someone took picture of courtroom and/or jury through the courtroom window

60

She admonished everyone again that no pictures are allowed in the courtroom/courthouse. The windows are now covered, Sheriffs investigating.

61

Judge told jurors they might have to have new procedures to protect them, but judge doesn’t want to discuss that just yet.

62

Erk analyzed five categories: Tour, Merchandise, Endorsements, Vegas shows and Vegas royalties.

63

The assessment was based on the price of ticket sales. The estimate of MJ’s gain was between $1.127 million and $1.511 million.

64

Erk said he’s been in the business for more than 34 years. He said artists always go back to do what they are good at.

65

Erk then calculated Tier 2 category, which is for future earnings for business MJ would most likely do.

66

He said he had MJ on a much reduced tour, period of hiatus, another reduced tour, and decline from there up until he was 65 years old.

67

My belief and perception of AEG executives as well, there’s no other artist like Michael Jackson, Erk opined.

68

Erk projected MJ do 260 shows, average of 2 per week. He said MJ was much bigger than any other artist.

69

Beyonce had a Pepsi endorsement deal of $50 million in 2012. Her most recent tour gross revenue was $119,500,000.

70

MJ’s TII Gross (2009 and 2010) — $638.976.138  Erk did a calculation based on Beyonce’s Pepsi deal and came up with $267,354,032.

71

He added $50 million clothing endorsement and came up with $317,354,032.

72

Erk said he could not compare Beyonce with MJ. “He was the King of Pop,” Erk explained. “There was no other like him.”

73

Projected Income to MJ – Vegas: $269 million. That was for Vegas show after MJ died, where MJ did not have to perform.

74

Royalties, for use of music, would pay 5% of box office: $102 million total.

75

Erk said the calculation in Tier 1 was based on things MJ was reasonably assured of doing. “I tried to err on the low side.”

76

Future Loss: For 37 months $1.127 billion – $1.511 billion; For 48 months $1.462 billion – $1.96 billion.

77

Professional fees: entertainment attorney, business manager and personal manager. Erk calculated MJ would have 20% expense in fees.

78

Future Loss Minus Professional Fees: 10% fee — Range from $1.014 billion to $1.764 billion; 20% fee — range $901,600,000 to $1.568 billion

79

I think their opinion is that there would be no loss of future income, Erk said about AEG economist and accountant expert. Erk disagrees.

80

Panish asked if Erk is familiar with artists saying this is it and returning to tour. “Not to me personally, but I’ve seen in the public eye.”

81

Erk did not calculate how much money MJ could earn making movies. He said he thought it was best left for the jury to decide.

82

Tier 2 is future touring. $373,985, 179 — total projected economic damages for Tier 2, including merchandising.

83

Erk calculated 4 more tours through 2024. Projected Income to MJ — Merchandise $79,407,278.

84

Panish then announced he concluded his direct examination. AEG’s attorney Sabrina Strong did the cross examination.

85

Erk said he spends half of his time doing business management and other half of royalty compliance.

86

Largely, Erk said he made estimations based on touring, but he is not a tour manager.

87

Erk testified he prepared tour budget before. But in his deposition, Erk said tour budget was not part of his responsibilities.

88

Strong said Erk estimated MJ would do 260 shows for TII tour, plus 4 more tours after that. She asked if that wasn’t too much. He said no.

89

Strong questioned Erk’s expertise in tours, endorsements, merchandising, Las Vegas shows.

90

Erk: I relied of what should’ve been an expert, AEG’s numbers.

91

Erk never met Michael Jackson. Strong asked if Erk had personal conversation with MJ about his future plans. He said no.

92

Erk’s firm has spent 650-700 hours for total efforts of all the employees in the company, including his 200 hours, in this case.

93

Strong: Had MJ not died in 2009, you estimate he would’ve gone on tour 3 more years, 4 more tours after that until age 66, correct?

94

Erk: 4 more tours, until age 66, was my professional opinion.

95

The show was called This-Is-It, he was going to blow it out, Erk said, adding MJ planned on earning as much money as he could.

96

Strong: At the time MJ passed away, TII was expected to be 50 shows, correct?

97

Erk: First leg, yes

98

Erk said TII sold 750K tickets in 5 hours, 525K people waiting to buy tickets. “Never done before, never done again,” Erk testified.

99

Erk said he had triple fusion surgery just before giving deposition.

100

Had he lived, I believe he would’ve performed the shows, Erk testified.  “I believe had he lived he would’ve taken the stage.”

101

For his projections, Erk assumed MJ was in good health.

102

Strong: Did not consider MJ was taking Demerol in a regular basis?

103

Erk: No, I did not

104

Erk said he didn’t consider MJ’s use of Propofol, drug abuse. “I’m not aware he was a drug abuser” Erk said; didn’t review medical record.

105

Erk said he would not have changed his opinion if he knew MJ was using Propofol.

106

Strong asked Erk if he knew MJ was ordered to pay $5 million in breach of contract for backing out of the Millennium Concerts.

107

Marcel Avram was the promoter. “And he also spent some time in jail,” Erk said. Strong showed a judgment Avram v MJ for breach of contract.

108

Did Mr. Jackson break the Jan. 14, 1999 contract by failing to perform the Millennium Concerts? Jury answered “Yes.”

109

There was $5.3 million in judgment for breaching contract. Erk said he didn’t even know about this judgment, didn’t use it in his opinion.

110

Strong laid out several lawsuits MJ had for failing to perform. Erk said he had not reviewed any of the prior lawsuits.

111

Strong: Did you take into account any of his prior failed projects?

112

Erk: No. He needed to work

113

Erk said he didn’t consider the fact MJ didn’t tour/perform in 12 years or Prince’s testimony that his father didn’t want to tour anymore.

114

Strong played KJ’s deposition. She said she was a bit surprised with MJ going on tour since MJ didn’t want to do Moonwalk on stage at 50.

115

Strong asked if Erk’s opinion was based on pure speculation. Erk said it was not speculative, he had reasonable assurance MJ would perform.

116

Strong: Mr Erk, are you aware Mr. Jackson generally spent more than $570K a month to live between Jan 2000-June 2009?

117

Erk: I don’t know that

118

Erk relied on a memo to come up with MJ’s monthly consumption. It has handwritten notes amounting to $570k.

119

Strong said there’s testimony MJ was a heavy traveler, used charter planes and stayed at the finest hotels, would take over entire wings.

120

Strong also said MJ spent $435,000 on air fare and hotels in two months period in early 2000s.

121

Judge adjourned session until 9:30 am tomorrow. Erk is back on the stand, only morning session scheduled for tomorrow.

122

After jury left, Panish said he wanted to put on the record that AEG didn’t know if the $5.3 million judgement was ever reversed on appeal.

123

Panish asked if he should present all the lawsuits AEG has been a defendant, like the boy who fell and died at Staples Center.

124

I certainly hope it is final judgment, judge said, adding she doesn’t want to have to undo anything. More on that tomorrow.

125

Attorneys discussed future calendar, it looks like jurors are having problems and need time off.

126

Apparently in August and September, there will be a lot of days off. There are 3 weeks with only 2 day of session scheduled.

127

Judge said mid-September has school starting, “it is just the nature of the beast.”

128

Panish said he will try to finish this week. Witnesses to come: Erk, an economist, Dr. Brown, Katherine Jackson and maybe Tom Barrack.

129

Judge told defendants’ attorneys to be prepared to start their case in chief on Monday.

130

To see Katherine Jackson’s deposition, watch @ABC7 and go to http://www.abc7.com . We hope to see you tomorrow! Good night everyone!

Tuesday July 16 DAY 49

131

Day 49 of trial has just concluded. Here’s Jacksons’ attorney Brian Panish speaking with our reporter. pic.twitter.com/K7OcHkFyZe

132

Here’s AEG’s attorney Marvin Putnam. Watch complete coverage on @ABC7 and http://www.abc7.com  pic.twitter.com/ebGPSW4cZU

133

Plaintiffs’ expert witness, Arthur Erk, back on the stand. Sabrina Strong, attorney for AEG, resumed cross examination.

134

Katherine Jackson arrived late. She is wearing a graphic print jacket, bold black leafs on white background.

135

Strong: AEG Live never projected MJ would’ve earned anything close to the $900 million you estimated, correct?

136

Erk: That’s correct

137

AEG Live never projected MJ would do 260 shows, Strong asked. Erk agreed.

138

Strong talked back about consumption, which is the amount of MJ’s expenses. She said MJ was $400 million in debt when he died.

139

Strong asked if Katherine Jackson’s Hayvenhurst home was about to go in foreclosure. Erk said yes.

140

The reason he was going on tour was to get himself straight, earn money to take care of his family, Erk said.

141

Historically, MJ spent more money than he earned, Strong said. Erk said that based on the accountant’s testimony, yes.

142

Strong said Siegel noted MJ had substantial income coming in and higher expenses going out.

143

Barry Siegel is one of MJ’s former accountant.

144

Strong asked if Erk knows why Siegel quit his job with MJ. Jacksons’ attorney objected to the form of question.

145

Strong then said assuming Siegel quit because MJ couldn’t control his spending, if that would’ve affect his consumption numbers. Erk said no

146

Strong: And that doesn’t account for million dollars shopping spree?

147

Erk: I don’t call it consumption, I call it fun money

148

Strong asked if MJ spent $20 to $30 million a year more than he was earning. Erk said yes.

149

Strong said $1 billion Erk estimated didn’t include repayment of MJ’s debts. (Implication is you can’t get damages for money to repay debts)

150

Erk said his job was not to consider whether MJ was going to repay his debts. He was hired to estimate MJ’s earning capacity had he lived.

151

Strong asked if Erk knows how much money MJ earned in 2001, 2002, 2003. He said no and that it had no relevance to his assessment.

152

Erk said he reviewed documents attached to depositions explaining MJ’s yearly earnings and consumption.

153

Erk said the estimate of cost of his firm’s work in this case is $300,000. He didn’t review thousands of pages, eliminated all unnecessary.

154

Erk explained he’s been doing this for 34 years and it would’ve taken an untold amount of man hours to go through all the documents.

155

Erk: In my and my partner’s experience, we are very good in judgments. We boiled down what we thought was important for the calculations

156

Strong said Erk’s opinion assumes that MJ would do something he had never done before.

157

Strong: The artist usually had the final decision?

158

Erk: Yes, they have final say but consult with the professionals that surround them

159

Strong showed Erk’s overview of the 260 shows the expert projected MJ would do had he lived, within 37 months.

160

Strong questioned Erk about his 260 tours estimates. She reiterated there’s no AEG document saying MJ would ever do 260 shows.

161

Erk said there was testimony that MJ could’ve done a 48-month tour, which would increase revenue in approximately 30%.

162

The increase would be based on higher ticket sales and merchandising. He didn’t include endorsement, which could be higher too.

163

Erk said he didn’t calculate how many more shows would be required to fulfill a 48 month tour.

164

Using the simple 30% increase calculation, there would be an additional 78 shows, totaling 338 shows in 48 months.

165

Question to followers: Do you think MJ wanted and/or could have done either 260 shows in 37 months or 338 shows in 48 months?

166

The expert said Randy Phillips, a top AEG Live executive, said in an email they would probably do a four year tour.

167

Strong asked Erk if MJ’s record high of number of shows was 123 shows for “Bad” tour in 1987 when MJ was 29 years old. He said yes.

168

Dangerous tour: began in 1992, MJ was about 33 years old, had 73 shows. Strong said Gongaware testified it was about 70 tours.

169

HIStory tour, 1996, MJ was 38 years old — 82 shows. Total of 275 shows if added all together.

170

Strong: Now you have him in one tour, 12 years later, at age of 50, doing 260 shows?

171

Erk: Yes

172

Strong said Erk calculated MJ would gross in “This Is It” more than 10 times he ever grossed before in a tour.

173

MJ’s highest gross tour is “HIStory” — $165 million for 82 shows. It ranks number 26 on the highest grossing tours of the all time.

174

Even though HIStory was the highest grossing tour for MJ, he didn’t take home any money, according to Paul Gongaware’s testimony.

175

Strong: You estimated gross of $1.5 billion for 260 shows and the highest you know MJ ever did was $165K?

176

Erk: Yes

177

Strong: And is that conservative?

178

Erk: Yes

179

Bad — $125 million gross. “I can tell you that show was fantastic!,” Erk opined on Bad tour.

180

Strong asked if Erk’s projection is inconsistent with MJ’s tour history. Erk said the show was called This Is It, his final extravaganza.

181

I packed a lot of shows in to go out with a bang, Erk said.

182

Regarding the ticket numbers, Strong said that for the 260 tours, Erk’s assumption was that it would sell approximately 13 million tickets.

183

Strong: Just like with the number of shows, MJ never sold anywhere near 13 million tickets, correct?

184

Erk: Yes

185

Number of tickets sold in “Bad” was close to 4.5 million. “HIStory” tour sold about the same number of tickets, 4.5 million.

186

Erk said he doesn’t think the child molestation trial would have any impact on whether people would attend his show.

187

Strong asked if MJ never agreed to do more than 50 shows. Erk said he doesn’t know if he agrees with that.

188

Erk said he spoke with Prince on Saturday and he said MJ told him they were going to Asia.

189

Strong asked if people had issue with MJ dangling a baby over the balcony of hotel. He said for a short time yes, but not to affect attendance

190

Strong: You estimated Mj would’ve sold 100% tickets for all the show?

191

Erk: Based on the huge, excessive demand, yes

192

Erk said MJ needed to work, needed the money, so had incentive to perform all shows.

193

MJ was on a category of his own, Erk said, he was the King of Pop, could not be compared to any other artist.

194

Strong: You had MJ selling out Rose Bowl three times?

195

Erk: Yes

196

MJ never performed at the Rose Bowl, Strong said. Panish objected saying MJ performed at Superbowl half time there and it was sold out.

197

Strong asked if Erk used the same price for tickets in all shows, in different countries. He said yes, just adjusted inflation.

198

There are a lot of wealthy people in India, Erk said.

199

Strong asked if Erk knew the stadium in Salt Lake City was for sports events only and that MJ would not be able to perform one show there.

200

Erk said if there was no negotiation, yes, he would not be able to perform there.

201

Judge adjourned session until 9:45 am PT tomorrow. Erk to resume on the stand. Strong estimates another half day of cross, judge gave 2 hrs

202

Jacksons’ attorney still wants to finish his case by the end of the week. There’s no afternoon session today.

203

Katherine Jackson will probably be plaintiffs’ last witness. It’s still unclear when the matriarch will take the stand.

204

After session ended, attorneys for both sides had a heated exchange of words in the hallway when they were talking to media and fans.

205

Both attorneys were shouting to each other, court clerk asked them to knock it off, called sheriffs.

206

After that, both attorneys gave us interviews about their views of the case. Watch complete coverage @ABC7 and http://www.abc7.com

207

We hope to see you tomorrow for complete coverage of the trial. Have a nice one, everybody. Court begins at 9:45 am PT tomorrow.

Wednesday July 17, 2013. DAY 50

On this day AEG’s lawyer Sabina Strong finally did what was inevitable in this case – she told us the real sum AEG was planning to pay to Michael as a result of performing 50 shows.

This sum was $22 million.

  • “Net Income, amount of money AEG Live projected MJ would take home had he performed all 50 shows at the O2 arena: little over $22 million”

Do you remember that AEG claimed that they were dividing their profit in the ratio of 90/10 –  90% as Michael’s share and 10% as AEG’s share?

And now we get first-hand information from AEG themselves that out of the $95 mln. for the tickets sold Michael was to get only $22 mln. which is less that one fourth of the whole sum collected for the tickets.

However even the balance of $73 mln. was not the final sum due to AEG. The real revenue was much bigger as it included merchandising and money from the 3D film which amounted to $37mln according to their preliminary estimations made in May 2009:

estimation

If we add up $73 mln and $37mln AEG’s share will come to $110mln, while Michael’s share will still remain at $22mln (in case AEG did not add some per cent to Michael for the merchandise).

So the real ratio in AEG’s business with Michael Jackson was planned to be roughly 20/80. In other words 80% of the money made for them by Michael was to be taken by AEG. 

In short it was going to be a big fraud.

Now we know how they make their billions, don’t we?

Wednesday July 17, DAY 50

208

Hello form the courthouse in downtown LA. Day 50 of Jackson family vs AEG trial is currently underway.

209

Jackson’s expert witness, CPA Arthur Erk, is back on the stand for cross examination. Sabrina Strong, for AEG, doing the questioning.

210

Outside the presence of the jurors, judge told everyone to follow the rules of the court and that things are getting out of hand.

211

This comment was made in light of the heated exchange between the attorneys in the hallway yesterday while talking to the media and fans.

212

Judge called attorneys for both sides into her chambers for a sidebar.

213

Earlier today, the court sent email to all media members that interviews are to be conducted only in approved areas or outside the building.

214

Yesterday, after session concluded, attorneys for both sides were in the hallway speaking to the media and got angry at each other.

215

Jacksons‘ attorney Brian Panish and AEG’s attorney Marvin Putnam shouted words to each other. Sheriffs were summoned to calm them down.

216

When jurors took their seats, Judge Yvette Palazuelos told them they have a better estimate for end of trial to be in mid-September.

217

Judge said attorneys are trying their best to expedite things, but with some days off and lots of witnesses estimate is stretched further.

218

Back to testimony. Strong asked Erk about sponsorship/endorsement. He estimated MJ would get $317 million in the “This Is It” tour.

219

Erk estimated clothing endorsement to be $50 million and $217 million based on a calculation of a Pepsi deal Beyonce had in 2012.

220

Erk said MJ’s clothing would become a fashion statement and that people would want to wear it. Thus the demand.

221

Strong questioned whether Erk really thought MJ, at 50 years old, would be a fashion icon for young audience. He said yes.

222

She then asked if the $50 million figure was speculation. Erk said no that he had reasonable belief shows would happen, clothes would sell.

223

Speculative is hope, Erk opined.

224

Erk came up with $50 million for clothing endorsement based on earlier deal of $28 million plus inflation/financial adjustments to year 2009

225

Erk said he relied on news reports regarding Beyonce’s Pepsi deal. He didn’t actually see the deal himself.

226

Beyonce’s most recent gross was close to $120 million. The Pepsi deal was, reportedly, $50 million, which is almost 42% of the tour revenue.

227

Strong: Do you know if anyone ever used your methodology to estimate endorsement deal?

228

Erk: No

229

Strong inquired Erk whether he knows any other artist who has endorsement being 40% of gross revenue.

230

Erk said that most endorsement deals are private, Beyonce’s was the only one that was made public through the media.

231

Strong questioned whether Erk always trusted the media reports to be true. He said no, but no one disputed Beyonce’s endorsement number.

232

Strong asked if Erk knows for a fact that Beyonce’s endorsement deal being 42% of gross revenue is true.

233

If the reported figures are correct, the 42% is correct, Erk said.

234

I answered before I didn’t see the contract, my firm doesn’t have Beyonce, I couldn ‘t confirm the deal.

235

Strong asked if Erk thought MJ’s image was rehabilitated in June of 2009.

236

What I do know as fact is that the demand was there, Erk said. “The demand was there, I think that is unquestionable.”

237

Strong: Was his image rehabilitated by June 2009?

238

Erk: It wasn’t consideration on my part since it sold so many tickets in a short time

239

I think AEG was more concerned with people in the US than worldwide, Erk said.

240

Strong: So my question was, do you think MJ’s image was rehabilitated to get an endorsement deal?

241

Erk: If you need a yes or no answer, the answer is yes

242

Erk: By evidence of selling so many tickers, I have no other way to come to that conclusion, but based on the facts of tickets sold, yes

243

Strong: You are not aware of any endorsement or sponsorship deal for TII tour being in place when MJ died?

244

Erk: No

245

Strong asked if MJ’s molestation accusations and trial affected his estimation in the endorsement deals.

246

The outstanding, unprecedented demand for tickets took care of that, Erk said.

247

Going back to Beyonce, Strong asked if Beyonce ever had negative publicity. “As far as I know, no,” Erk responded.

248

Strong asked Erk if he relied on AEG’s own budget to come up with his estimations. He said yes.

249

AEG’s projection of what MJ would take home was a little over $20 million, according to the budget Strong showed.

250

Net Income, amount of money AEG Live projected MJ would take home had he performed all 50 shows at the O2 arena: little over $22 million

251

Alternative budget had projection of a little over $30 million, Strong showed.

252

Strong said the range AEG Live was projecting MJ would take home for performing all 50 concerts at O2 arena was between $22 and $30 million.

253

AEG projected 750,000 tickets sold and didn’t estimate revenue of merchandising.

254

AEG did not project a single dollar in endorsement in this budget or any other budget that Erk saw.

255

Strong showed a side-by-side demonstrative of AEG’s and Erk’s projection.

256

Erk’s projection: Approximately 13 million tickets sold, 260 shows, merchandising and endorsement estimate.

257

Net revenue to MJ, 260 tour $460 million

258

Merchandising $121 million

259

Endorsements $317 million

260

Net number of $890.5 million

261

Erk said he relied on email exchanges from September 2008 that included records, movies and others, such as worldwide tour.

262

It shows they clearly intended to take him around the world, Erk said about the email on the plan, mentions a net to MJ of $132 million.

263

Erk said AEG had no idea of the demand and when the shows were sold out in a matter of hours they knew they could take the show everywhere.

264

Strong: Do you know any tour that ever grossed that much?

265

Erk: No. This would’ve been world record breaking tour

266

Strong: You testified in your depo you have no idea whether MJ would be successful at making movies, correct?

267

Erk: That’s correct

268

Strong asked if Erk recalls Katherine Jackson saying MJ didn’t want to do the Moonwalk after he was 50. He said yes.

269

Strong played Paris Jackson’s deposition regarding future plans: Paris says her dad wanted to relax, didn’t want to tour anymore.

270

However, Paris also said it was a world tour. “How did you know that?

271

Because he told us we were going around the world,” Paris said.

272

Strong showed demonstrative with Erk’s projection for MJ’s future tours:

273

40 shows at 60 years old

274

50 shows at age 63

275

45 shows at age 66

276

Erk acknowledged MJ did 275 shows between 20-50 years old.

277

Strong: So you had him do 455 shows over 5 tours until the age of 66?

278

Erk: 260 shows were reasonably certain to happen, 195 shows was an estimate based on my professional opinion.

279

Strong finished her cross examination. Judge broke session for lunch, Jacksons attorney did re-direct in the afternoon.

280

Erk said AEG’s experts in the same field as his charge more than him for the work.

281

Katherine Jackson not present in court in the afternoon.

282

Panish: Has Mr. Jackson ever been proved guilty of any allegations that AEG mentioned?

283

Erk: No

284

Panish asked if Phillips, Anschutz, Gongaware did not enter into an agreement with MJ due to concerns of the allegations?

285

Erk: They entered into the 3 year tour contract as well as movie deal

286

Panish: Was there any emails AEG, Philips, Gongaware saying they didn’t want to make money off of MJ due to the allegations raised?

287

Erk: I didn’t see anything to that effect.

288

Panish asked Erk if Tiger Woods had some things that could be viewed as negative allegations against him. He said he believed so.

289

As to Tiger Woods, Erk said in 2012, he believes it was reported endorsements went back up to $70 million.

290

Panish: Alex Rodriguez — has there been allegations against him regarding certain activities?

291

Erk: Yes, surfacing every once and a while

292

Panish: How are his endorsements?

293

Erk: He’s doing fairly well

294

Regarding Beyonce and her endorsement deal, Erk said the calculation he made came up to 18,5%, not the 42% Strong said.

295

Panish asked if MJ’s past and the allegation have anything to do with how much money MJ could earn.

296

Erk said he based his opinion on AEG’s projection and “if it was good enough for them, it was good enough for me.”

297

AEG spent money before even getting to London, Erk testified.

298

Panish asked Erk to assume Phillips estimated MJ would make $50-100 million for London dates if it was consistent with his opinion. He said yes

299

Panish: Assume Phillips said MJ’s earnings could rise to 500 million if he did a world tour? Is that consistent with your opinion?

300

Erk: Yes

301

As to future tours, Erk said Paris testified in her deposition (played earlier today) that MJ told her they would tour worldwide.

302

Erk said Ortega’s deposition and testimony talked about take this tour on the road, to the world, and that MJ would like for him to go too.

303

Erk said Ortega discussed going to India and Japan with MJ.

304

Panish asked if MJ and Ortega working further together. Erk said MJ wanted to ultimately produce movies.

305

Erk said AEG had the resources to find out about MJ’s financial issues and there’s no reason to believe they didn’t know about MJ’s problems

306

Erk said he didn’t focus on MJ’s health because AEG signed the contract and began spending money, which determined the tour would go forward

307

Panish asked if Erk saw evidence AEG was concerned with MJ’s health. Erk said only that he passed a physical, was healthy and ready to go.

308

Panish: Did Phillips make statements as to whether MJ could perform a worldwide tour?

309

Erk: Yes

310

Panish said AEG had questions of Demerol, baby, allegations, trials so he wanted to clear whether there was demand for the tour.

311

Panish showed Gongaware’s testimony when he talked about the high demand for MJ’s tickets.

312

Panish: Did you take that into consideration as to whether or not there would be demand for MJ’s tour?

313

Erk: Absolutely

314

Panish asked why he took Phillips and Gongaware’s testimony into consideration for his projections and calculation.

315

They were the ones selling the tickets, they should be in the know, Erk said.

316

Panish: Was MJ popular and could’ve sold tickets?

317

Erk: Absolutely

318

Panish read a lengthy testimony from Randy Phillips when he said they were all surprised with the demand for tickets and standby people.

319

Strong objected, and added that there’s no question about the demand for the 50 show.

320

Panish: Is there any question in your mind AEG not only believed they could sell out in London but worldwide?

321

Erk: No question

322

Panish: Would you describe the demand for MJ’s ticket a hope?

323

Erk: No

324

Erk went through the email describing what Phillips’ plans were.

325

“If London goes smoothly, we could migrate this show to the brand new, state-of-the-art stadium in Berlin, the O2 World,” Phillips wrote.

326

Email from September 2008 plan: In July 2009 — If all goes well, we embark on a well routed and spread out worldwide tour taking advantages of the gigantic secondary ticket market, massive sponsoring opportunities subject to how well we have rehabilitated him and very lucrative “exotics”.

327

Mick Jagger is 69 years old, lead singer of the Rolling Stones. He just finished up shows that AEG promoted, Erk said.

328

Keith Richards had a long history of heroine problems, Erk said. He’s also almost 69 years old and is touring, doing quite well.

329

Barbra Streisand is 71 and just finished up shows for AEG as well, Erk testified. Erk said Streisand grossed more than $18 million.

330

Panish showed a spreadsheet with all MJ’s monthly expenses. The annual consumption based on actual receipts for MJ — $7.6 million.

331

Erk said he used $570K/month, which would work out to $6.7 million. He used higher monthly figure, but less annually.

332

For professional fees, Erk said he considered 10-20%, anywhere between $3-5 millions.

333

Panish: Does people usually lend money for people who can’t pay it back?

334

Erk: No

335

Erk said MJ had assets to secure loans. Erk explained how the loan of significant amount of money works.

336

Erk said MJ did not have working income in ten years.

337

Panish: If you don’t have work income, is it possible you’re going to spend more than you earn?

338

Erk: Most likely

339

Panish: What was it that secured the debt?

340

Erk: Primarily his Sony/ATV catalogue

341

Panish: Did you just make-up this world tour idea?

342

Eark: No

343

Here’s a first-draft look at worldwide MJ tour.

344

Email from Gongaware: MJ first draft worldwide tour projection

345

Right now we project 186 shows… Net to Mikey $132 million. On paper, it starts Jan 9 and runs thru April 2011... It’s a big number, but this is not a number MJ will want to hear. He thinks he’s so much bigger than that. Talk in terms of gross receipts, he suggested.

346

186 shows over 27 months — Gongaware projection

347

260 shows over 37 months — Erk projection

348

Erk said AEG had 1.59 show per week in their projection and Erk had 1.60 shows per week in his projection.

349

Panish showed a document Gongaware attached to his projection with a list of tentative venues all over the world.

350

World tour included: Berlin, Hamburg, Munich, Paris, Zurich, Milan, Johannesburg, Dubai, Japan, India, Australia, New Zealand

351

More tours:, South America, US starting in Florida, Texas, New Orleans, California, Denver, Utah, Chicago.

352

Panish said this is a document prepared by Gongaware in addition to the 50 shows in the O2 arena.

353

There was a projection of $3-$10 million for private shows. Except with the private shows, Erk says his calculation was similar.

354

Panish asked if shows in AEG’s projection were carried over to 37 months, how many shows would that be?

355

Erk: Almost 260

356

Panish asked why 37 months. Erk said contract between MJ and AEG was 3 years, and he added a month.

357

Panish asked Erk is he saw multiple AEG documents detailing plans for worldwide tour. He said yes.

358

Panish: What are the figures AEG used for worldwide tour?

359

186 shows for 27 months

360

260 shows for my budget, 37 months

361

Erk said that prorating the same amount of shows in 37 months, it is almost 260 shows.

362

AEG projection is $132 million in the low end, $150 million in high end for less shows, less months, Erk said.

363

Erk said he used stadium shows and bigger arenas because of unprecedented demand.

364

Email from Phillips to Leiweke on April 15, 2009: He is happy and they picked all male and female dancers. I intend to shove those 50 shows up Irving’s and Rapino’s asses and march on to do another 3 years of a world tour.

365

Email Thomas Overseen saying he had a client with serious interest in MJ’s tour in India.

366

Phillips answered: Thanks, Thomas. MJ will definitely heading your way

367

Panish asked Erk if he reviewed this email to determine if the tour in India wasn’t just a hope, but plan. He said yes.

368

Erk said Phillips was striking deal with Bravado to rent empty store in Oxford Circle to offer nothing but MJ merchandising.

369

Panish asked if Erk believed it would help sell the merchandise. He said yes.

370

In re-cross Strong asked if Erk saw the June 2009 AEG budget and how much money AEG projected for the sale of merchandising.

371

Erk said he saw it and believes it was maybe in the $10 million range or thereabouts. Erk projected $121 million, the expert said.

372

Strong: And the merchandise projection AEG had was between $8 and $10 million, right?

373

Erk: Yes, that’s what was in the budget

374

Strong pointed in the email where there was an indication for “a” date in India, not 60 dates in India like Erk projected.

375

Strong: AEG Live had a lot of hope after selling the show?

376

Erk: I think it’s more than hope

377

Strong: Wasn’t AEG hopeful for a successful tour?

378

Erk: You’re always hopeful

379

Email from Phillips to Nanoula in June 2008 detailing the plans for MJ’s future: Richard, these are just my off the cuff ideas…

380

The email mentions 12-14 new songs and then release of series on new singles. Erk said he doesn’t know that MJ finish them.

381

Strong: Randy Phillips acknowledged that all had to go well, didn’t he?

382

Erk: It appears that way

383

Strong asked if Phillips hoped he could have massive sponsorship opportunities if all went well. Erk said yes.

384

Erk said he has no knowledge of what AEG tried to do to get sponsorship opportunities for the tour.

385

As June 2009, Strong asked if Erk saw any evidence or sponsorship in place before his death. He said no.

386

Strong talked about the September 2008 email with $132 million projection.

387

She asked Erk if the email was written without knowing whether MJ would ever agree to it. He said yes.

388

Back to India, Gongaware projected 3 shows plus one private show. He contemplated 8 shows in Japan plus one private.

389

Strong said Gongaware’s projection was not near what Erk calculated.

390

Email from Phillips to Leiweke: Colony is receptive but skeptical like us as to whether MJ will really work.

391

Strong: No one at AEG projected the numbers you projected, correct?

392

Erk: That’s correct

393

Strong: MJ agreed to only 50 shows at the time he passed away in June 2009, isn’t that correct?

394

Erk: Yes

395

Panish in re-re-direct: What did he tell his children

396

Erk: We’re going on a worldwide tour

397

He took his children wherever we went, Erk said

398

Panish asked if selling out in a matter of hours is going well. Erk responded “Yes and then some.”

399

It can always go better, but it was fantastic, Erk said.

400

Panish asked if Gongaware, as good promoter and with the sales he saw, would want more shows. Erk said he would’ve done as many as he could.

401

Next witnesses: Dr. Emery Brown (on Propofol) and economist Peter Formuzis

402

Erk is excused. Judge adjourned session until 10 am PT tomorrow.

403

During arguments late in the day, judge asked AEG if they intend to call Dr. Murray to testify. Putnam responded he has no intention.

404

For all the latest, watch @ABC7 and visit http://www.abc7.com . We hope to see you tomorrow for complete coverage of the trial.

405

Here’s a link to today’s story with Paris’ deposition: http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=news/entertainment&id=9176665

As to the number of shows AEG was planning for Michael Jackson we can make our rough calculations ourselves.

The article below quotes the details of Jackson’s deal with AEG and says that Michael could make $400 mln. for the four years of touring the world. The Wall Street journal estimation of his earnings was $30mln to $50mln for 30-50 shows which roughly made $1mln per show.

But if one show was to pay Michael $1mln. (according to the Wall Street journal) how many shows was AEG planning for Michael if they promised him $400 mln all in all?

400 shows?

No matter how much money this suit boils down to isn’t this AEG business an eye-opening experience for all of us?

March 6, 2009

Michael Jackson Could Make as Much as $400 Million from Comeback Concerts

Yesterday, Michael Jackson engaged in a rather awkward fan conference that was assembled to announce his run of dates at London’s O2 Arena. Today comes word that Jackson could make a boat load of money from the dates–as much as $30 to $50 million– and if he decides to take the shows international (which he reportedly is considering), he could make upwards of $400 million over the next four years. 

The Wall Street Journal has the details of Jackson’s deal with AEG Live, which is planning a similar run of dates for Jackson in Asia and North America (which couldn’t go down until 2011, for unexplained reasons).

Depending on how many dates he adds, Mr. Jackson’s take from the London concerts alone could be between $30 million and $50 million, according to people familiar with the matter. Tickets to the London performances are to go on sale, via an online lottery system at MichaelJacksonLive.com, next Wednesday for £50 ($70) to £75 ($105) each.

Mr. Jackson would then have the option to add more dates in Europe, Asia and finally North America. But he is not committed to play any shows beyond the original 10, and would in any event not reach the U.S. before 2011. “He has been the biggest star in the world and it’s time for him to get back on the stage,” said Randy Phillips, president and chief executive of AEG Live.

http://www.prefixmag.com/news/michael-jackson-could-make-as-much-as-400-million-/26683/

*  *  *

It is Friday July 19th and Michael’s mother is to testify today. Sina has sent us wishes for Mrs. Jackson which I am posting here on behalf of many of us:

We wish Mrs Jackson courage, strength and spiritual guidance to stand her ground today against AEG .

The love for your son, your search for justice and clarity what happened to him and the heavy but honorable task you were given to guide Michaels children for him will see you through.

There will be attempts to distract you, to bring you down, to discredit you, like they did to your son.

But as T. Mesereau said, you have morality on your side.

You have the love and support of your family, friends and the silent majority of fans who have been loyal to you from the first time we heard of your family nearly 50 years ago, and still today.

We are sure that members of TeamMichael, who we thank for their hard work, will be there to show their support for the part of the fans who want justice, who believe in the righteousness of the case and in you.

Let me also add that we shall be praying for you…


Filed under: AEG THE HORRIBLE, Jacksons vs. AEG Tagged: AEG Live, Arthur Erk, Michael Jackson

Jackson – AEG trial DAY 52. KATHERINE JACKSON’S TESTIMONY and $5 for the privilege of knowing the TRUTH

$
0
0

There are two reasons for this post. One is to make a summary of Katherine Jackson’s testimony on Friday July 19th and the second is to talk about those of us who use the court transcripts from TeamMichaelJackson. 

TEAMMICHAELJACKSON NEEDS HELP

Judging by the SOS tweets coming from the Team the situation with funds for the scripts and the Team member’s health is indeed desperate and the worst part of it is that very few in the fan community are giving a damn.

Everyone wants to have the transcripts but all have their reservations when it comes to donate a dollar for making the transcripts happen.

If people are afraid that Taaj Malik will make a fortune out of our donations they are wrong – the cost of the transcripts is much higher than the scarce sums occasionally dropping in towards buying them.

Some may not be supporting because of the Team’s openly anti-Estate position. I don’t like their vehemence against the Estate either especially since up till now we have not seen any serious arguments in favor of so much hate for the Estate.  I’m constantly on the look-out and waiting and waiting and waiting for something really incriminating to surface at this trial, but have not seen anything really substantial yet.

The email sent by Branca on June 20th enquiring about a possible substance abuse and offering help cannot be in any way thrown against him firstly because 1) he offered qualified medical help which was blatantly rejected, and secondly because 2) Branca knew of Michael’s condition in 1993 and had not met him for several years before 2009, so based on his earlier experience had valid reasons to suspect a relapse. He did not observe Michael’s state on a daily basis like AEG did and only heard about it from other people’s accounts and still he offered immediate help – only they didn’t pay any attention to it.

In short throwing Branca into one pile with AEG would be a tremendous bias. At the moment I don’t see anything about his actions bad enough to outweigh the great job he is doing to repay MJ’s debts (I’ve read on TMJ that they nearly finished with repayment of $400mln).

But though the TeamMJ curses against Branca do make me unhappy I am ready to put all differences aside until better times and acknowledge that the TeamMJ’s efforts in determining the truth about Michael’s death and seeking justice for him are purely heroic.

Doing what they are doing – on a daily basis and for several months too – is nothing short of heroism and a great example of selflessness which people these days lack very much indeed.

So it is absolutely indecent of us to take advantage of the Team and Taaj’s efforts and not contribute to their work or alleviate their burden at least a little bit. Saying a mere ‘thank you’ for their heroism and back-breaking toil is a somewhat inadequate reaction. The job they are doing is done at the expense of their health, time, well-being and ultimately life.

In this respect they are following Michael’s example, so those who know the real him will know the sacrifice it involves.

The worrying tweets from Taaj Malik of TeamMJ came yesterday, just on the day of Katherine Jackson’s testimony and if I were using this type of language I would also say WTF:

  • I have ran myself into the ground, have spent thousands going up and down to court, have compromised my health, and no help from MJFam WTF!!
  • YOU KNOW WHAT, Michael was alone whilst alive, alone now DEAD!!!!!
  • If you all had a concert to go to, so he can KILL himself, you would be digging deep into ur pockets!!! I FEEL UTTERLY ashamed
  • ONE PERSON HAS DONATED NEARLY $1,000 she is NEARLY EIGHTY YEARS OLD!!!! SHAME ON YOU!!! All talk the talk cant walk the walk, I cant physically do it any more, I CANT DO IT ANYMORE, JUSTICE4MICHAEL NEEDS HELP
  • I don’t have TV firm backing me, paying me wage, i got it all myself! YOU wanna rely on media who didn’t even report Phillips SLAPPED MJ
  • Michael has 40 MILLION fans on FB, how many THOUSANDS ON TWITTER???  Seems the only ONE who wants to know What happened to her son is Mrs Jackson, and handful that have donated for transcripts!! Rest can go take a jump!!
  • I NEED EVERYONE OF YOU TO DONATE $5 payments via Paypal to Manager@TeamMichaelJackson.com KJ Transcripts coming up in ONE hour
  • Those that have already donated, PLEASE do NOT donate again, MJFAM is a family, everyone SHOULD do their part
  • My health has deteriorated beyond repair. after treatment yesterday my left side became paralyzed. i collapsed in the street, can’t walk
  • I was not able to get to court today which was THE most important day of trial! To stand tall and strong for KJ.

First of all I whole-heartedly wish Taaj good health. It is a hard job to be helping the Heavens – we are only humans and human resources are not limitless, so I do wish Taaj full recovery and getting some good news to raise her spirits a bit.

Secondly, ingratitude is one of worst sins possible, so if we don’t want to fall into it please rush to their site and donate your $5 each. I will never believe that none of us can afford it, so any remonstrations in this respect are useless. If Taaj receives thousands as a result so much the better – she will be able to use some for mending her health, and we can pride ourselves on helping someone in their time of trouble and doing a little bit of charity on the way. However I doubt that with the present attitude towards donating there is a danger of any surplus money ever.

And third, we need to do it not even for the TeamMJ but for the sake of truth, so that the truth prevails over lies. So discard your last doubts – you are doing it for yourself in the first place.

There is no time to wait, reflect, doubt or debate. Just GO and HELP and you will never regret the good deed done:  http://teammichaeljackson.com/archives/8530

This is the latest of what I’ve read in this connection on the TeamMichaelJackson site:

TeamMichaelJackson's appeal July 19th, 2013

TeamMichaelJackson’s appeal July 19th, 2013:                                                                                                                                              PLEASE SUPPORT US TO PROVIDE YOU FUTURE TRANSCRIPTS. We can only provide them for the next ONE week, as donations have run out, we have provided them for the last EIGHT weeks, no notes will be taken, our founder is too sick, this is the only way to get accurate informaiton, which is court transcripts, TRANSCRIBED! Please remember we have reported FACTS left out by the media numerous times. We are getting THOUSANDS of hits daily yet only one or two are donating (95% transcripts purchased have been by TeamMichaelJackson ADMIN! This is heartbreaking, the ones to take advantage of these yet not even donate $5. If all of you donated just $5 each, we can provide them till end of the trial, and get the ones we missed at the beginning of the trial. Please sent payments via Paypal to manager@teammichaeljackson.com

TeamMichaelJackson has already posted the court transcript of Katherine Jackson’s testimony on July 19, 2013. Here are some excerpts retyped from it.

EXCERPTS

Panish: Is it difficult for you to come here and bring up a public matter like this in front of the public?

K.Jackson: Yes, it is. The most difficult thing is to sit here in this court and listen to all the bad things they say about my son.

Q. Why is that difficult for you?

A. Well, a lot of the things that have been said are not the truth. He’s not here to speak for himself.

Q. So are you here to speak for your son, Michael?

A. I’ll try my best.

Q. And why is it that you’re here to testify today?

A. Because I want to know what really happened to my son, and that’s why I’m here.

Q. And do you believe that your son was a bad person, or some of the things that have been said? And the Defendants have said, “It’s ugly,” and they’re “Going to expose the ugly of your family and your son.” Mr. Putnam said that at the beginning of the case. Do you believe that’s the case?

Mr. Putnam: Objection, your honor. Misstates the testimony and my comments.

Q, Mr. Putnam said in his opening statement. Did you sit here, hear his opening statement.

A. Yes, I did.

Q. Did Mr. Putnam take your deposition for many days?

A. Yes, he did.

Q. Did he ask you many questions you didn’t like?

A. Yes, he did.

Q. And how does it make you feel to hear that they’re going to tell everyone that your son is a bad person?

A. Makes me feel real bad, because I know my son was a very good person. He loved everybody. He gave to charity. He’s in the Guinness book of records for giving the most to charity of all the pop stars. I’m so nervous. I’m sorry.

Q. Did you have any health issues, Mrs. Jackson, when you were growing up?

A. Yes. I had polio as a child. It was – at that time it was called infantile paralysis because most babies got it at the time. But President Rossevelt had it also and he started the March fo Dimes. And that was back in the ‘40s when I was in school.

Q. And how did that affect you when you were growing up?

A. Uum, I wore a brace from the age of 7 up until –

Q. You wore braces?

A. Just one brace on my left leg, and wore it up until the age of 0.

Q. How did that make you reel as a youngster?

A. I was shy.

Q. How was your son Michael with children who had disabilities?

A. Michael loved all children, but especially the ones who couldn’t care for themselves or had something wrong with them. Everywhere he would go, he would go to the orphanages and would go to the hospitals visiting children. He would always give money for disabled children. And when he was young, he would always have someone visiting from Make a Wish foundation. Michael would spend all day with them, have lunch with them, play with them.

Q. How did you all fit in that house?

A. I had triple bunk beds, and the largest bedroom was the boys’ room. And Joe and I had a room. And then I – the two girls at the time, La Toya and Rebbie, they slept in the living room on a let-out couch, pull-out couch.

Q. And then did your boys – -they they sing together at any time then?

A. Yes, they did. Sometimes by them sleeping in the room together, sometimes I’d wake up to them harmonizing and singing.

Q. And what kind of a – how did six people fit in three bunk beds? Triple bunk beds.

A. Okay. Jackie was the oldest so he had a bunk to himself.

Q. He got his own bunk?

A. Got his own bunk. He was the lucky on. And the others doubled up, other two. Randy was a baby, so he was in a crib in our room.

Q. Okay. So two, two and one?

A. Right.

Q. Did you always have a lot of money?

A. No, not at all.

Q. Were you able to survive and make it?

A. Oh, yes. We — I made some of the children’s clothes. I – and that was the first thing, is clothing and feeding the children. I made a lot of clothes. I watched the newspapers for sales. I bought a lot of things on sale. And sometimes we’d go down to the Salvation Army when shoes were wearing out, and sometimes we’d find shoes for some of them. And we made it that way. And when Joe was laid off, us having to live from payday to payday, the money was scarce, and so we had to eat. And so we would never want to go on welfare. So what he did, he went out to the farms. He picked – he picked vegetables, I canned food. And we would always buy – every year we would buy a quarter of a cow or half a cow and keep it in the freezer. And that’s how we survived.

Q. Have you spent a lot of time in your life reading the bible?

A. Yes.

Q. Now, did your children – did they become raised Jehovah witnesses?

A. Some – they were raised, but some of them became witnesses. Michael became a witness, my oldest daughter, and she still is. And LaToya became a witness.

Q. And others went into other religions?

A. They’re not.

Q. All right. We won’t go there.

Q. How old was he? [Michael]

A. Five years old. And he sand “Climb Every Mountain” and I was so nervous when he walked out on the stage, because he was always shy. And he started singing the song, and he sang it with such clarity and didn’t miss – not flat or anything. Joe’s father sat there and cried like a baby. Looked around, and I was crying, too. He got a standing ovation for his performance. And he wasn’t nervous, and I was shocked. And I think he must feel more at home on stage.

Q. How did that make you feel?

A. I felt – I was proud of him because I didn’t think he could do it.

Q. And what did you think when you got to California?

A. I had always wanted to live in California. And when I was a girl, I used to dream of coming to California because it was so much snow back home, cold. And sometimes it would get 10, 15 below zero. And I would go to the movies as a girl, and I would see. And they would always show California – because we got out news sometimes in the theater, especially the war news, and all that. And I always thought when I had to leave the theater and go out in the snow to get home, and my dream was to live in California.

Q. All right. And did Michael like to sit around and watch TV?

A. No. You’d never catch him doing that. And I had to sit here and see that email talk about how lazy Michael Jackson was. That’s the biggest lie in town. My son is not lazy, and you know that he wasn’t lazy.

Q. How was Michael in school?

A. Michael was good in school. He was not an exceptional student, but he was fair student.

Q. Was he as good as Prince?

A. No, not at all.

Q. Okay.

A. Prince is a straight A student.

Q. Was Michael having a lot of success?

A. Pardon?

Q. Was Michael having a lot of success?

A. Yes.

Q. Did it go to his head?

A. No. Michael was the most humblest person you’d ever meet.

Q. Did he continue living with you?

A. Yes.

Q. Until he was 30?

A. Yes. 

Q. Did he ever go out with you – and is part of the religion to go out to people and spread the word of your faith?

A. Yes. Field service, we call it. He had to – the way he’s dressed now. So one morning we got up, and it was the first time that he dressed that way, because people knew who he was, so he couldn’t do field service or kids and people followed him. So he had to try to disguise himself. And the first time he disguised himself, he got a fat suit, not real fat. And I came down, and he had had breakfast. And I was getting ready to go out in field service with him, and I spoke to this man, like “Hello. How are you?” and he said, “It’s me, mother”. But he had to do it.

Q. So he would go out and knock on people’s doors with the suit on?

A. Yes.

Q. He’d get the door slammed in his face?

A. Lots of times. But they never knew who it was, so that was good.

Q. Did your grandchildren, Paris, Prince and Blanket, did they like Neverland?

A. They loved Neverland.

Q. During the time they lived there, were they being home-schooled?

A. Yes.

Q. And we saw a lot of animals that Michael had there?

A. Lots of animals. Funny story is – kids liked to go to Chuck E.Cheese.

Q. Chuck E. Cheese?

A. Yes.

Q. Like pizza? Like a lot of kids running around?

A. A lot of kids running around. So Grace had them at Chuck E.Cheese, and the lady there, she was asking them, “Do you like animals? Do you have any animals?” And the kids said, “Yes. We have an elephant, and we have giraffes,” and just naming all the big animals. And the lady turned to Grace and said, “Don’t they have great imaginations?” Not knowing that they really had those things.

Q. Now, as Michael’s mother, did there ever come a time when you heard news that he had medical issues caused by pain?

A. Yes.

Q. What caused pain for Michael that you were aware of?

A. Well, he had been burnt.

Q. Bad burns?

A. Bad burns on the back and the top of his head. He even had a balloon between his scalp and his head.

Q. Did he get migraine headaches?

A. He got headaches. Very bad headaches.

Q. Was that from the Pepsi commercial?

A. Yes.

Q. And did Michael take money from — that was given to him as a result of being burned from the Pepsi commercial and do anything with that?

A. He took that money, and he donated it to the burn center. All of it.

Q. Did he have other medical conditions and injuries that caused pain?

A. Back.

Q. Back injuries.

A. He had back injuries.

Q. Did he have a skin condition?

A. Yes. He had vitiligo.

Q. What is vitiligo?

A. It’s a disease that turns your skin white. But while it’s doing that, you have – you’re spotted. It works slowly. And so he just wanted to get it over with, and so he just turned the whole thing that way.

Q. Now, did – did you ever discuss with Michael whether he ever had insomnia?

A. You know, he didn’t talk much about insomnia to me, but he would tell me sometimes, “I didn’t sleep last night”, that was when he was at home. So I imagine it was just starting.

Q. Did he trust doctors?

A. Yes, he did.

Q. Do you know who his doctor was? His primary doctor?

A. When he was growing up?

Q. When he got older.

A. As he got older? I know that Dr. Metzger was his doctor even when they were young, too.

Q. Did you ever see him abuse drugs or medications?

A. No. I’ve never seen that in him.

Q. Did you hear that people said that Michael was abusing prescription on medications?

A. I had heard it.

Q. Did you hear it from some of your children?

A. Yes.

Q. Did you believe it?

A. Well, I know he was taking pain pills. And when he said “abusing them,” I didn’t know. Because at that time I had seen Michael so many times, gone to his home unannounced and called him, he didn’t know I was calling him, I never heard or seen him in that way. So I don’t know how to believe it.

A. Well, I know he was taking pain pills. And when he said “abusing them,” I didn’t know. Because at that time I had seen Michael so many times, gone to his home unannounced and called him, he didn’t know I was calling him, I never heard or seen him in that way. So I don’t know how to believe it.

Q. Did you or your children ever try to have any type of intervention of any kind with Michael?

A. Yes. I went with them on an intervention once, because – I didn’t want to go, because I didn’t believe it then that he was abusing drugs. But I had heard it from them, and they had heard it, also. But I went because they telling me, “it would mean much more, mother, if you would go.”

Q. So you went?

A. So I went?

Q. And did Michael say he had a problem?

A. When we got there, Michael was fine.

Q. Did you hear of other times that people tried doing interventions with Michael?

A. Not – the children talked about it, but I imagine if they did any others, they did it without letting me know.

Q. Did you know whether he had a problem one way or the other?

A. I couldn’t prove it.

Q. Did you think maybe he might?

A. I kept hearing it. It thought maybe he might. And then I – when I went to his home after he had moved to Las Vegas, and I talked to him about it because I was worried. And he promised, and he kept saying, “mother I’m okay, I’m okay” but sometimes the mother’s the last to know. And sometimes they’re embarrassed and don’t want to let me know. But I was  — I told him, “I don’t want to wake up one morning to the news that you’re not here anymore”.

NOTE: As far as we know when Michael arrived in Las Vegas from Ireland he didn’t give anyone any reason to think that he needed interventions. To me it looks like vivid imagination on the part of some people.

Q. Did you have a family gathering in May 2009?

A. Yes, I did.

Q. What was that for?

A. That was supposed to be for my 60th anniversary, but it was the wrong time. I think Janet just named it that so we could have an anniversary or a party.

Q. Were you ever asked by anyone to sign anything saying Michael had any issues in 2007?

A. Did I ever? Yes, I did. But you know what? I really don’t remember that thing. But I did sign something. 

Q. I’m going to show you exhibit 1023, a poem he wrote called “Mother.” “Mother” – did Michael write this for you?

A. Yes.

MOTHER by Michael Jackson

MOTHER by Michael Jackson

MOTHER by Michael Jackson

Mother dear, you gave me life

Because of you, no struggle or strife

You gave me joy and position

Cared for me without condition

And if I ever change this world

It’s from the emotions you’ve unfurled

Your compassion is so sweet and dear

Your finest feelings I can hear

I can sense your faintest notion

The wondrous magic of your love potion

And now that I have come so far

Met with every king and czar

Encountered every color and creed

Of very passion, every greed

I go back to that starry night

With not a fear for muscle or might

You taught me how to stand and fight

For every single wrong and right

Every day without a hold

I will treasure what you’ve mold

I will remember every kiss

Your sweet words I’ll never miss

No matter where I go from here

You’re in my heart, my mother dear.

Q. …How did that make you feel when Michael gave it to you?

A. Well, it made me cry, for one thing. And I felt very – - very loved. I knew he loved me. 

Q. Can you tell us how have you been affected by the loss of the love, companionship, affection, support, by the loss of your son, Michael?

A. Excuse me, can you repeat?

Q. Sure. The loss of your son, Michael, the support, the love, how has that affected you?

A. When a mother loses a child, you – no one know until it happens to them. That’s the worst thing that can happen to a person, losing a child. I lost my mother, my father and my sister. I’m the only one left. But when I lost Michael, I lost everything. He was the most loving, down to earth, he loved everybody. Very humble. Very humble. No matter –

Q. Now, Mrs. Jackson, did you think your son could have done 50 shows?

A. Yes. But the only way he could have done them is if they had them spaced out. They couldn’t be every other night like AEG wanted at first. That’s why I kept calling.

Q. Who were you calling?

A. I called Randy Phillips, and I called doctor – what’s the name?

Q. Dr. Tohme?

A. – Dr. Tohme, first. And I told him, “Michael can’t do those shows. They have to change the schedule of it.”

Q. So you were just concerned about the spacing out of the concerts?

A. I was concerned about that. It they spaced it out, he could have done many shows.

Q. Did you visit Michael ever at the Carolwood home?

A. Yes.

Q. Did you go there before he had his press conference in England?

A. Yes.

Q. Before the press conference, did you go in his bedroom?

A. Yes.

Q. Were there any doors locked at that time?

A. No. Every time I went there, we went into his bedroom, and we went into all the other parts of the house. My nephew sitting there now, he would always be with me, and Michael would invited us up there, and we would watch movies, and he would show us different things that he had been doing.

Q. Okay. Now, did you ever know who Conrad Murray was before your son died?

A. No.

Q. Now, how did you hear about Michael’s death?

A. I had been out in field service that morning, and when I came home, I had a call from Joe, my husband, and he told me that one of the fans had called him and said – you know, fans are always hanging around the house outside. And told him that he saw them bring somebody out on a gurney, and he was covered completely up. And Joe called me, and I sort of got angry, and I was scared at the same time. And I said,” Joe, that doesn’t have to be Michael. Why are doing that to me?” So later on I got a call to go to the hospital, because I thought maybe he was sick.

Q. Did you go to the hospital?

A. Yes, I did.

Q. Who was there?

A. Well, I saw some of the people that worked with Michael, and I saw Conrad Murray, not knowing who he was. He was pacing back and forth. And so my nephew and I were talking, Who is this man that is going back and forth? And we saw Frank Dileo, and finally Frank Dileo said, “That’s Dr. Murray”. That’s the only time I knew who he was. And still I was asking him, “Where is Michael? I want to go see him.” And nobody wanted to tell me. And so they took me to a room, and I was sitting in there waiting. And so I guess they were back there debating somebody to come. And so Frank Dileo came and told me that Michael had a reaction. And I said, “Well, how is he?’ And nobody said anything at first. They looked so funny. And I said, “Well, did he make it? Did he make it?” And Frank said, “No.”

Q. What did you do?

A. I was – everything went dark, and I just heard screaming.

Q. Did you see Paris and Blanket and Prince at this time?

A. No. I didn’t see them until later. They took me into a room, and they had two nurses in there. And then they brought Paris and Blanket and Prince in the room. And they were crying so hard.

Q. Was Paris doing anything in particular?

A. She was just screaming, looking up at the sky, to the ceiling, saying, “Daddy, I want to go with you. I can’t live without you. I’m going with you.” That’s all she kept saying. And then they kept going down to the morgue. I guess it was the morgue. Somewhere in the hospital. I didn’t go because I didn’t want to see Michael like that. And they kept going down and coming back and go back again. Finally, La Toya came, and she went down with them. And I said, “What are they doing?” and she said, “They’re hugging their daddy and crying.”

Q. Did – after you left the hospital, did you take the children to Hayvenhurst with you?

A. Yes. They told us that it was time for us to go and that – we had been there for a long time. And Paris and the kids came out, we walked out to the garage where the cars were, and Paris looked at me and said, “Grandma, where are we going?’… And I told her, “Your’re going home with grandma”.

Q. Has it been a difficult adjustment for the children without their father?

A. The two boys adjusted fine. I would say “fine,” but – because you never know with their thinking. But Paris had the hardest time. But I thought she was the bravest because – she had so many pictures of Michael. When I told her I was going to decorate her bedroom, and I bought everything and decorated. And I had some of my pictures for her bedroom. And she said, “I have pictures.” And she had about five big pictures of Michael, and she said, “I want these two over my bed” and over her desk. She had them all over her room. And I was wondering, “How could she do that?” Because I didn’t want to see him; every time I saw him, I felt so sad. The after we moved, she just had a collage. Her whole wall, like the one you saw of the house that Michael did for me. Her bedroom was just Michael’s pictures.

Q. Now, did Paris do something about getting a necklace with a heart?

A. Yes. Before we put Michael away, my nephew and I and Paris and her brothers, she had us running everywhere trying to find this special heart. And it was a heart, a broken heart. And when she got it, she went to the morgue, and she hung one part around her father’s neck, and she wore the other half.

Q. I want to show you exhibit 1034-1. Is that Prince?

A. Yes.

Q. How has Prince been affected?

A. Prince, he talks about his father sometimes. But he has a lot of company with his cousins and things, and he doesn’t show his emotions that much.

Q. He’s more subdued?

A. Yes.

Q. Can you tell he misses his father?

A. Oh, yes, he does.

Q. Now, Paris. Let me show 1035-1. Paris. Did she used to take one of Michael’s shirts and do something with it?

A. Yes. She took his pajama top when he first died, and she didn’t want anybody to wash it. She said, “I want it just the way daddy wore it. I want his scent on it.” She put it in a pillow, and she put a bell around it, and she sat it on her bed, and that’s the way she wanted it.

Q. How has Paris been affected by the loss of her father?

A. Oh, my goodness. She – - one of my grandchildren told me that she would tell them that she wanted to go where daddy was.

Q. She had a hard time?

A. She had a very hard time at first.

Q. Has she had to get medical help?

A. Pardon?

Q. Has she had to get medical help?

A. Yes.

Q. Go to the hospital?

A. Yes.

Q. Has she had a really hard time with the loss of her father?

A. Yes.

Q. How about Blanket?

A. Blanket was young. He was seven when Michael died. He’s 11 now. He’s come a long way.

Q. How often was he with his father?

A. Everywhere Michael went. The other kids were in school, so everywhere Michael went, he took Blanket with him.

Q. Let me show exhibit 1036-1. Is this Blanket?

A. That’s Blanket.

Q. He still have long hair?

A. Yes.

Q. Does he like long hair?

A. He don’t want to cut it because that’s the way Michael liked it. He’s 11, but he’s going to have to cut it sooner or later.

Q. You don’t want him with long hair?

A. I don’t want the long hair, but he doesn’t want to cut it so I’m not going to do it to him yet.

Q. Let’s talk about Michael being a father. Do you know if he wanted to be a father?

A. My goodness. More than anything else.

Q. Did you have occasion to talk with him and observe him with children?

A. Yes. Talked to him a lot.

Q. How would you describe Michael as a father?

A. He’s one of the best fathers. You’d be surprised. You would really be surprised at what a good father he was. He cooked for them. He did all these things. And he never cooked before, but the kids thinks it’s the best food they ever tasted.

Q. Did Michael’s writing of music change at all after he had children?

A. Yes, it did.

Q. How?

A. Well, his music was more, I should say, loving, more meaningful. He wrote from his heart more. It just changed his life, and it reflected in his music.

 

Q. Mrs. Jackson, do you miss you son?

A. Words can’t explain it.

Mr. Panish. Okay. That’s all the questions I have. Thank you.

CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR.PUTNAM

Q. …You initiated this lawsuit against AEG Live, correct?

A. Yes.

Q. And do you remember when you filed this lawsuit, ma’am?

A. I don’t remember the exact time.

Q. If I were to tell you that it was in September of 2010, would that sound right to you?

A. That’s about right.

Q. And you brought this lawsuit on behalf of yourself, correct?

A. Yes.

Q. And you also brought it as the guardian to Mr. Jackson’s three children, correct?

A. Yes.

Q. And was it your choice, Mrs. Jackson, to bring this lawsuit?

A. Yes, it was.

Q. And did you ever talk to Mr. Jackson’s children about whether or not to bring this lawsuit?

A. I never talked to the children about it.

Q. Okay. So this was your decision alone, correct?

A. Yes.

Q. Did you ever discuss it with any of your children prior to brining the lawsuit?

A. After.

Q. After. And what about with your husband, Joe Jackson? Did you discuss it with him?

A. No, I never did.

Q. So did you discuss this with anybody besides your attorneys prior to brining the lawsuit?

A. I don’t think so. I can’t remember that doing anything like that. My husband doesn’t live with me, so I didn’t discuss it with him.

Q. And you brought this lawsuit, you said, despite the fact that you’re a very private person, correct, ma’am?

A. Yes, I am. 

Q. Okay. And you said that you brought the lawsuit because you wanted to search for the truth, is that right, ma’am?

A. Yes.

Q. And is that what you’re hoping will come out of this lawsuit?

A. I want to find out, and I think I owe it to my son to find out what really happened to him. I’ve had – heard a lot of stories, and I know and I even heard from my grandchildren after my son died that my son was being pressured, and he was asking for his father. And the kids would tell him he didn’t know what to do. My son was sick, and nobody is like – I can’t think of – Kenny Ortega said that they wouldn’t even hand him a hot cup of tea, and they knew he was sick. And instead of calling – nobody said, “Let’s call the doctor. Let’s see what’s wrong with him.”. Nobody said that. And I was sitting there listening, and I was wondering, and I was sitting there listening to all the names they called. That’s hard for me, sitting in court and listening to them call my son a freak, saying he was lazy. And not too long ago, couple days last week, I had – no, I was – this week I had to listen to a lot of things, talking about how broke he was.  He didn’t take a dime home. But if you know he didn’t take a dime home, why didn’t you look further and see that why he didn’t take a dime home? He gave it to charity, and he gave a lot of things to charity.

Q. And I apologize, ma’am. I don’t quite understand it. When you say “she said,” who are you talking about?

A. You know who I’m talking about?

Q. Who are you talking about, ma’am?

Mr. Panish: Ms. Strong.

Q. Oh, you mean the woman asking the questions?

A. It hurts to sit here in court and listen to all these things about him, defining him as a freak and all of that. It’s hard for me. And then listening to how sick my son was and nobody was trying to help him.

 

Q. When you say that it’s hard to sit here and listen to people say these things, and you mentioned now a couple times the idea of your son being lazy, you also heard Mr. Gongaware explain that what he meant by that was that your son didn’t like to rehearse. You did hear that, correct, ma’am?

 

A. All I heard was “lazy”. May he was talking about rehearse, but he’s not lazy.

 

Q. I understand that. I’m asking, did you hear what Mr. Gongaware actually meant by those words?

 

A. Yes.

 

Q. And you heard what he said, that he was talking about the fact that Mr. Jackson historically didn’t like to rehearse?

 

A. Mr. Jackson was sick and couldn’t rehearse.

NOTE:  Putnam is lying. Gongaware’s email was dated sometime February or early March when there were no rehearsals. He was most probably referring to the press-conference and Michael’s unwillingness to do publicity for the show.

 

Q. …when you said it’s hard to sit here and listen to these bad things, one mentioned the idea – the email where Mr. Gongaware said that he was lazy, and I’m asking you if you can remember what other bad, untrue things you’ve heard in the last 12 weeks?

A. The called him a freak.

Q. And you’re talking about the email—

A. They were making fun of him. “Finally get a change to meet the freak.”

Q. And are you talking –

A. And you know –

Q. You’re talking about an email from someone who isn’t a party to this lawsuit, correct, ma’am? That was somebody outside of the Defendants in the lawsuit who said that. Do you remember that, ma’am?

Mr. Panish: I’m going to object. It’s not outside the defense. It’s the General Counsel lawyer.

Mr. Putnam: No, it’s not general counsel.

Mr. Panish: It was AEG’s general counsel –

Mr. Putnam: Not true.

Judge: Overruled.

Mr. Panish: — Mr. Fikre.

Mr. Putnam: Mr. Fikre.

Mr. Panish: Yes, Mr. Trell’s boss.

Mr. Putnam: Not Mr. Trell’s boss.

Q. Do you recall that, Mrs. Jackson, that it was actually sent to somebody at AEG Live, not sent from AEG Live. You remember that, ma’am?

A. I don’t know who it was, but I’m just saying that it’s hard to sit here and listen to it.

NOTE: Another lie from Putnam. Mr. Fikre is one of the lawyers at AEG Live and is a member of their board of directors. Here is the actual email:

AEG's lawyers exchange emails calling MJ a "freak"

AEG’s lawyers exchanged emails calling MJ a “freak” just before signing a contract with him

Q. … I’m just trying to understand. You said it’s hard to listen to the untruths, and you’re looking for a search to the truth, and I’m trying to think of what untrue things you heard, ma’am.

A. He’s not a freak.

Q. Anything else, ma’am?

A. My son is dead. He’s not here to talk for himself, so anything bad that’s said about him hurts very much.

Q. But –

A. And some people love doing that to him.

Q. Doing that to your son?

A. Yes.

………….

FULL COURT TRANSCRIPT OF KATHERINE JACKSON’S TESTIMONY on July 19th:

THE TWEETS FROM ABC7 Court News give the short of it:

Friday July 19th, DAY 52

3

Hello from the courthouse in downtown LA. Day 52 of Jackson family vs AEG trial is about to begin.

4

Katherine Jackson will take the stand today. She’s one of the plaintiffs in the case.

5

Our reporter John Gregory will bring all the latest details on @ABC7 Eyewitness News at 11 am PT.

6

As you know, judge does not allow live tweets from the courthouse. We’ll bring you complete coverage as soon as we can.

7

Our reporter Miriam Hernandez is in the courtroom gathering all the latest info. We are in the overflow room watching the proceedings live.

8

Katherine Jackson arrived at 9:27am PT.  She was wearing a purple and blue abstract print jacket.

9

Brian Panish takes her hand and leads her to the witness stand. Her fingers are curled as she takes the oath.

10

At 9:40 am PT, Katherine Jackson took the stand and was sworn in. She states her full name: Katherine Esther Jackson.

11

She said her date of birth is May 4, 1930, which makes her 83 years old.

12

Mrs. Jackson said this is the first time she’s testified in court and she is a little nervous.

13

Mrs. Jackson: No

14

Panish: Did you get a lot of sleep last night?

15

She said she’s a little hard time hearing. Mrs. Jackson testified she’s a private person, she’s always in the background of her children.

16

The most difficult thing is to seat there in this court and listen to all the bad things they say about my son, Mrs. Jackson explained.

17

They are not true, she said. “He’s not here to speak for himself.”

18

Panish asked if she was here to speak on his behalf. “I will do my best,” she answered.

19

I want to know what really happened to my son and that’s why I am here, Mrs. Jackson said.

20

Panish: How does he make you feel that they said they were going to say you son was a bad person?

21

Mrs Jackson: My son was a very good person. He gave to charity, is on the record for giving to charity. I’m so nervous, I’m so sorry.

23

Panish: When you learned MJ was going to name his son Prince, were you happy?

22

Mrs. Jackson: Very!

24

Mrs. Jackson said MJ named his son Prince because of her family. “He loved my father,” she said.

25

Mrs. Jackson testified the musical talent came from her grandfather on her mother’s side, Columbus Brown.

26

She said her mother would open the windows and his song rang over the valley.

27

Here’s a picture of Katherine and her father with Michael Jackson. It was shown to the jury. pic.twitter.com/HAZ1XVhwwP
Michael, Katherine and Katherine's father Prince.   Q "IS PRINCE A FAMILY NAME IN YOUR FAMILY, MRS. JACKSON?" A.  "THAT NAME GOES ALL THE WAY BACK TO SLAVERY. HIS FATHER, HIS GRANDFATHER, HIS GREAT GRANDFATHER, HIS GREAT GREAT GRANDFATHER WERE ALL NAMED PRINCE".

Michael, Katherine and Katherine’s father Prince. Q “IS PRINCE A FAMILY NAME IN YOUR FAMILY, MRS. JACKSON?” A. “THAT NAME GOES ALL THE WAY BACK TO SLAVERY.
HIS FATHER, HIS GRANDFATHER, HIS GREAT GRANDFATHER, HIS
GREAT GREAT GRANDFATHER WERE ALL NAMED PRINCE”.

28

My father taught us to play the guitar, Mrs. Jackson said. Her sister played the cello. “We always had music around the house.”

29

Mrs. Jackson said she had polio as a child, Infantile Poliomyelitis. “I wore a brace on left leg from age 7 to 9,” she said. “I was shy.”

30

Mrs. Jackson said Michael loved all children, especially those who had something wrong with them: orphans, hospitals for disable children.

31

Michael would spend the day with Make a Wish foundation.

32

Mrs. Jackson married Joseph Jackson when she was 19 and he was 21. They lived in Gary, Indiana.

33

They bought a house on Jackson Street. “It was a coincidence,” she said. It looked like a garage in a way. It was a 4 room, 2 bedroom house.

34

She raised 9 children: Rebbie, Jackie, Tito, Jermaine, LaToya, Marlon, Michael, Randy, Janet

35

Mrs. Jackson said they had bunk beds. Jackie was the oldest, he got his own bunk. Randy was baby, slept in Katherine and Joe’s room.

36

Mrs. Jackson said that sometimes she would wake up to them harmonizing singing. Joe worked in a steel mill, was sometimes laid off 2-4 weeks

37

She took a job, between Randy and Janet, since there was a 5 year gap. She was a clerk at Sears and Roebuck.

38

Panish: Did you always have a lot of money?

39

Mrs. Jackson: No, not at all

40

Mrs. Jackson: I made a lot of clothes, watch the newspaper, bought a lot of things on sale, went down to Salvation Army to get shoes.

41

I had to live payday to payday, Mrs. Jackson explained. “The money was scarce, we had to eat.”

42

She said they didn’t want to go on welfare. “We picked vegetables, fruits, keep in the freezer and that’s how we survived.”

43

Panish: Are you a good cook?

44

Mrs. Jackson: The kids think so

45

I know how to prepare a potato every way you can think of, Mrs. Jackson said.

46

She said she enjoyed having a large family and lived in a cul de sac near little league field. Jackie and Tito played baseball.

47

Here’s a picture of Jackie and Tito’s baseball team. pic.twitter.com/rFvqnp95C8

.

48

Michael would spend his money with candy and cookie, Mrs. Jackson said. He would set up a store to sell them.

49

I was always close to God, Mrs. Jackson said. “II raised my children the best I can with spiritual guidance.”

50

She was raised Baptist, then became Lutheran and wasn’t satisfied with that. When old enough to understand started searching.

51

I searched and found the true religion: Jehovah Witness, Mrs. Jackson testified.

52

Jevohah’s witnesses don’t celebrate birthdays or other dates. They celebrate one day, that’s Jesus last supper.

53

Some became Witnesses, Michael, Rebbie and LaToya. The others are not. Her husband wasn’t a witness, so they didn’t stop holidays right away

54

Picture of Katherine Jackson during her high school years. “Oh my God, that’s me,” a shy Mrs. Jackson said. pic.twitter.com/nF3u9OfvSE
Katherine Jackson in high school

Katherine Jackson in high school

MJ at the age of two [ABC7 Court News pictures]

MJ at the age of two [from ABC7]

55

Michael was born Aug 29, 1958. As to this photo: “It shows my sweet little boy to me,” Mrs. Jackson said. pic.twitter.com/eFYPVjZMaB

56

Michael was always sensitive and loving, Mrs. Jackson said. One day, when his brother was sick, Michael was holding his hand and cried.

57

Panish asked when MJ showed he loved music. “He was born dancing,” Mrs. Jackson said. “He was in my arms and couldn’t be still, was dancing”

58

Mrs. Jackson told a story when she had a Maytag with roller that squeezes water out. It was old and rusty and it would make a squeaky noise

59

MJ would be dancing to the squeaking noise. “He was dancing and sucking in bottles,” Mrs. Jackson said.

60

The children loved the Temptations and imitated them all the time, Mrs. Jackson said. Panish asked if they had television in the house.

61

Mrs. Jackson: We had an old TV, TV would break, had a TV man take it aways and sometimes didn’t have money to get it back.

62

The children would sing and dance, she said. “We always had music in the house.”

63

They were very young, they danced and sang. Michael was 5 years old, they went on to contests at school, then professional.

64

There was not a lot to do in Gary, Mrs. Jackson said. So the high school had events and the boys would win every time there was a contest.

65

Michael won every contest. When the other kids knew the Jacksons were coming they were Oh my God!, Mrs. Jackson said.

66

Originally, the name was Jackson Brothers Five, but the name was too long, so they cut it short to Jackson 5.

67

Mrs. Jackson: Michael was 5 and the sang Climb Every Mountain. He started singing, my father and I cried like a baby.

68

Jackson 5 lost a contest once to a boy who lived next door and won that year.

69

Panish: How did that make you feel?

70

Mrs. Jackson: I cried

71

Jackson 5: The boys rehearsed at the house. “We saved money to buy amplifiers,” Mrs. Jackson said. pic.twitter.com/97UJ3wehza

The boys rehearsed at the house [ABC7 pictures]

The boys rehearsed at the house [from ABC7]

They wore home-made suits [ABC7 pictures]

They wore home-made suits [from ABC7]

72

Mrs. Jackson said she made the suits. She said they were called “Homemade suits” (the jury laughed) pic.twitter.com/LlTIwqBSrQ

73

Mrs. Jackson: When Gladys Knight and Temptations would ask for us to be on stage with them and they got paid that way.

74

They signed with Motown in 1968. The boys moved first to California, Katherine came four months later.

75

I had always wanted to live in California, Mrs. Jackson explained, since Gary, Indiana was so cold and snowed.

76

Jackson 5 started making records when they signed with Motown. The first 4 singles became number one records, Mrs. Jackson recalled.

77

Mrs. Jackson explained the Jacksonmania that happened at this time. Shes said there was so many girls around the house she got tired of it.

78

They’d come and stay all day and sometimes they stayed so late I had to drive them home, Mrs. Jackson remembered.

79

Panish showed video of their early life in Gary, Indiana, dancing at 5, Motown, audition, ABC song, TV show, Motown 25.

80

Panish: As mother, when you saw MJ perform like that, how did you feel?

81

Mrs. Jackson: I felt very proud

82

Special performances surprised Mrs. Jackson. When he was 14 he sang solo in the Academy Awards shows. “I was very proud of him,” she said.

83

Panish: Were you nervous about it?

84

Mrs. Jackson: I was a little bit, but he did well

85

Mrs. Jackson said MJ liked rats. One time they went to Beverly Hills to have dinner and he kept putting crumbs in his pocket to feed the rat

86

Michael didn’t like dogs, Mrs. Jackson said. She recalls one day of a dog bite and Michael been afraid ever since.

87

Despite that, Michael got a chocolate Labrador for the children, named Kenya. They had a turkey, a parrot, ferrets, mice, cats.

88

Michael was a very good artist, Mrs. Jackson said. He did a lot of art in school and some of this pictures have been sold. He’d write songs.

89

Katherine said Michael didn’t seat and watch TV. She said it’s very hard for her to seat and watch them talking about Michael being lazy.

90

My son was not lazy, Mrs. Jackson said. “That is the biggest lie around.”

91

MJ was a straight A student. He liked movies, Katherine named a few: The Wiz, Sidney, 12 Angry Men. Panish show snippet of The Wiz.

92

Jurors were highly entertained at this point. Some smiled, some pursed their lips as if they were trying not to smile.

93

Katherine said Michael and Quincy Jones got along very well, worked together in various projects: Thriller, Bad, Off the Wall.

94

Panish: When Michael was 21, did he write down what his goals were?

95

Mrs. Jackson: Yes, Michael wrote notes to himself

96

She said he’d write where he wanted to be at certain time, how he wanted an album to sell. He was still living at home in Hayvenhurst.

97

He wanted to be known as MJ, not little Michael or little Jackson, Mrs. Jackson explained.

98

Panish showed video of the first time MJ did the Moonwalk (Billie Jean song). Jurors smiled.

99

He used to practice all the time, Mrs. Jackson said. He has a room over the garage where he danced two hours straight without stoping.

100

The sequined silver jacket MJ was using in Billie Jean was Katherine’s. He went into her closet, got it before the show, never gave it back.

101

MJ continued to live with Mrs. Jackson until her was 30. “When he became 18, he wanted to buy me a house,” she testified.

102

But by that time houses had gone up to millions of dollars, so he decided to rebuild the house.

103

The way you see Hayvenhurst is the way he rebuilt it, Mrs. Jackson said. He had a room upstairs he didn’t want anyone to go in.

104

He then got all the pictures and put them on the wall instead of wallpaper. He said ‘here’s your surprise,’ she said.

105

Plaque to Katherine Jackson pic.twitter.com/ykKiZjKBfI
To my mother [ABC7]

“The reflections of a Mother’s heart is in the glimmer in her children’s eyes   Her every emotion and feeling is somewhere in her child’s character     Noblemen are what their mothers made them.    Why does my mother cry    Are those happy tears or tears of sorrow     Oh please God let them be happy tears    All my success has been based on the fact that I wanted Mother proud     To win her smile of approval” [from ABC7]

106

Panish showed video of the room. “He gave this to me,” Mrs. Jackson said. Even the ceiling has pictures. “Everything is covered.”

107

Panish: Did MJ like music videos?

108

Mrs. Jackson: Oh yes. They were like short movies, Thriller. He invited me down while doing movie “Ghost.”

109

Mrs. Jackson: I was seating at the set, a white male man came to me and I said I’m here to see my son. He said ‘mom, it’s me!’

110

Michael was involved in the Jehovah Witness for a while, did “filed service.” He had to disguise himself, wore a fat suit.

111

In 1988, Michael purchased Neverland. Panish showed video of it, the animals, roller coast, poem written by Michael, movie theater.

112

He finally got a candy store, Mrs. Jackson said.

113

Mrs. Jackson said Michael made the ranch available to people. He opened it to disable children, would invite classes of children.

114

In the movie theater, Katherine said they had special chair for sick children who couldn’t seat in regular seats.

115

Panish: Did it have a train station?

116

Katherine: Yes

117

P: What is it called?

118

Mrs. J.: Katherine

119

Katherine said the children loved Neverland.They were homeschooled.

120

The kids would go to Chuck & Cheese and other kids would ask do you have animals? They would say elephant, giraffes, Mrs. Jackson recalled.

121

One lady once told Grace ‘don’t they have great imaginations,’ she said.

122

Mrs. Jackson said Michael had been burned, badly burned, and was in a lot of pain. He had a balloon under the scalp.

123

Mrs. Jackson: He took that money from Pepsi settlement and donated it to the children’s burn center.

124

He had back injury too, she said. He had vitiligo, a disease that turns the skin white. “He just wanted to get it over with” she explained.

125

He didn’t talk much about his insomnia, Mrs. Jackson said. He couldn’t sleep at all at night when he was at home.

126

Panish: Did you ever see Michael abuse drugs or medications?

127

Mrs. Jackson: No, I never saw

128

Mrs. Jackson: I know he was taking pain medications. Many times I went to his room unannounced and I never saw him that way.

129

She said she tried an intervention because she heard from the other kids but didn’t think he was abusing drugs.

130

The other children told her it would mean much more if she went. “When we got there, Michael was fine,” Mrs. Jackson said.

131

She went to MJ’s Las Vegas home and talked to him about drug abuse. Michael said “Mom, I’m okay, I’m okay.”

132

Mrs. Jackson: Sometimes a mother is the last to know… and sometimes you are embarrassed.

133

Picture of Katherine Jackson’s 60th anniversary in May 2009. pic.twitter.com/9LjmzJWxMx
A big gathering in May 2009. The 60th anniversary of the Jacksons' marriage [ABC7]

A big party in May 2009  [from ABC7]

134

Mrs. Jackson: At time time to me Michael looked ok. Later, I saw he was thin, he was dressed in jacket and all, I didn’t notice he was thin.

135

Michael and I were very close, Mrs. Jackson said. He was the son — a mother wouldn’t want a better son than Michael. He was very shy.”

136

Poem Michael wrote to his mother. pic.twitter.com/Trv1J3itVr

137

Panish: How did that make you feel?

138

Mrs. Jackson: It made me cry for one thing… I felt very loved.

139

Handwritten note from Michael to Katherine Jackson. pic.twitter.com/KddXYIiCqz

140

Mother, My Guardian Angel — by Michael Jackson pic.twitter.com/ElcO7ITREY
Mother, My Guardian Angel, by Michael Jackson

Mother, My Guardian Angel, by Michael Jackson [from ABC7]

141

Panish: When you received that, how did it make you feel?

142

Mrs. Jackson: I cried

143

Panish: Did he give you gifts?

144

Mrs Jackson: All the time. He gave me everything, the necessities of life, gifts, cars, jewelry, mobile homes

145

Panish: Did he give you money?

146

Mrs. Jackson: Yes, cash. Michael never wrote checks

147

As to how she’s affect by the loss of love, support: Mrs. Jackson: No one knows until it happened to some

148

Mrs. Jackson: That’s the worse thing that could happen. When I lost Michael I lost everything. He was the most loving, very, very humble.

149

When a mother loses a child, Mrs. Jackson said crying “that’s the worse than can happen to a person.”

150

She said she heard about the This Is It tour through Grace Rwamba.

151

Mrs. Jackson said she lost the best thing ever as she wiped out tears.

152

She said he was joking when he said he didn’t want to do the Moonwalk at age 50. “He used to think that 50 was really old.”

153

Mrs. Jackson said she didn’t think her son could do 50 shows every other night as was planned. She called Randy Phillips and Dr. Tohme.

154

Mrs. Jackson didn’t know who Conrad Murray was until after MJ died. She didn’t know MJ had died when she arrived at the hospital.

155

She said she had been out on field service and she said one of the fans said they brought someone out on a gurney completely covered up.

156

Later on I got a call to go to the hospital, I thought he was just sick, Mrs. Jackson said.

157

Mrs. Jackson said she saw many people who worked with Michael at the hospital, like Frank DiLeo. Dr. Murray was pacing back and forth.

158

Mrs. Jackson: Nobody wanted to tell me, I was seating and waiting, I guess they were back debating.

159

Michael had a reaction, they told Mrs Jackson. “I said how is he? Did he make it? Did he make it? And Frank said no,” she recalled, crying

160

Mrs. Jackson didn’t see the children until later. “I was crying so hard,” she said.

161

Paris was saying ‘dad I want to do with you (crying), I can’t live without you’ that’s what she kept saying.

162

Mrs. Jackson: They were there hugging and saying ‘Daddy, I love you!’

163

I went down to the morgue, never wanted to see Michael like that, Mrs. Jackson testified, crying.

164

When they left, Paris said ‘grandma, where are we going?’ Mrs. Jackson told her ‘you are going home with grandma.’

165

Panish asked about the adjustment without their father. She said the two boys I can say fine. Paris is having the hardest time.

166

Paris had 5 big pictures of Michael in her room and Mrs. Jackson said she wondered how she could do that, she saw them and felt so sad.

167

Paris’ whole room is a collage of picture just like MJ had, Mrs. Jackson said.

168

Mrs. Jackson said Paris was looking for a special heart. She found a broken heart, hung one part in Michael’s neck and she put on the other.

169

Prince is affected by not spending time with his father, Mrs. Jackson said.

170

Paris took MJ’s pajama top, didn’t want anyone to wash it. She sat it on her bed.

171

Panish asked how Paris is affected. “Oh My God! She wanted to go where daddy was,” Mrs. Jackson said.

172

Blanket doesn’t want to cut his hair. Daddy loved his hair, so he doesn’t want to cut it.

173

Michael was one of the best fathers, Mrs. Jackson said. “You’d be surprised what a good father he was.”

174

Mrs. Jackson said MJ’s writing changed, he was more loving and meaningful, he wrote from his heart more.

175

Words could not describe the love for his children, Mrs. Jackson described.

176

Panish: Mrs. Jackson, do you miss your son?

177

Mrs. Jackson: Words can’t explain

178

Panish finished direct examination. AEG’s Marvin Putnam did cross examination.

179

Putnam asked if Katherine saw all the exhibits that were going to bed shown in court today. She said yes.

180

Putnam: You initiated this lawsuit against AEG Live?

181

Mrs. Jackson: Yes

182

She doesn’t remember when it was filed, brought it on her behalf and the children. It was her choice to bring this lawsuit.

183

She never talked to MJ’s children about it, discussed with her children after, but not with Joe.

184

Putnam asked her that despite being very private person she brought on this lawsuit and has lived a very public life for the past 40 years.

185

My family is famous, I was always on the background, Mrs. Jackson explained.

186

Putnam asked her if she gave interviews to Dateline, 20/20, Oprah (after my son died). She said yes.

187

My life is as private as much as I can keep it private, she said. She said she was nervous being in front of people she doesn’t know.

188

I wanted to find out, I think I owe it to my son to find out what really happened to him, Mrs. Jackson said.

189

I heard stories and I heard from my grandson he was being pressured, that he was asking for his father, that Joe would know what to do.

190

Mrs. Jackson: My son was sick and Kenny Ortega said nobody gave him a cup of tea. Nobody said call the doctor, let’s see what’s wrong w/ him

191

Mrs. Jackson said it was hard for her to be sitting here in the courtroom and listening people “call my son a freak, saying he is lazy.”

192

This week I had to listen how broke his was, he didn’t take a dime home, Mrs. Jackson said.

193

Why he didn’t take a dime home? Because he was giving it to charity.

194

Mrs. Jackson: It hurts to seat here in court and hear how sick my son was and no one was trying to help him.

195

Putnam then asked: But the witnesses called were by your attorney, right? Mrs. Jackson responded yes.

196

Putnam asked about Dr. Murray: “My son needed another doctor, a real doctor,” Mrs. Jackson said.

197

Mrs. Jackson: The doctor was for his children but I didn’t know who he was. Later I heard it was Dr. Murray.

198

Putnam said Gongaware explained lazy was because her son was late for rehearsal.

199

He was not lazy, Mrs. Jackson said. “Mr. Jackson was sick, he couldn’t rehearse.”

200

Putnam: He didn’t like to rehearse in prior tours. “Michael didn’t have to rehearse a lot, he knew the moves, he helped create them” she said

201

I want the truth on what happened, Katherine testified.

202

Putnam asked what was untrue and bad things said in the trial. Mrs. Jackson said ‘they called him freak, having a chance to meet the freak.’

203

Putnam asked if this was sent by someone who is not a party to this lawsuit, sent to AEG Live.

204

Mrs. Jackson: I don’t remember who sent it, I know it is hard to seat here and listen to it. He’s not a freak.

205

My son is dead, so anything about him said that is bad, it hurts, Mrs. Jackson explained.

206

Putnam: It was very hard hearing all the bad things said about your son for the past 40 years?

207

Mrs. Jackson: Yes

208

Putnam questioned the fact that Mrs. Jackson’s attorneys didn’t deny the fact that her son had problems with drugs.

209

My son was on prescription drugs, that doesn’t make it true about other drugs they said he was on, Mrs. Jackson said.

210

Putnam asked if she sued Kenny Ortega as well. She said she doesn’t’ remember, there was a list of people in the suit.

211

The attorneys stipulated that Mrs. Jackson dropped the lawsuit against Kenny Ortega. Then there was lunch break.

212

Panish told court Mrs. Jackson was sleeping over lunch hour, since she got very little sleep last night, and will be probably 1 hour in pm.

213

Putnam: Bringing lawsuit, hadn’t spoken with grandchildren or children before filing the suit?

214

Mrs. Jackson: Yes

215

Putnam asked if it was before or after the criminal trial of Dr. Murray. She said she did not remember.

216

Mrs. Jackson was at the criminal trial almost every day.

217

Putnam: Is it fair to say the criminal trial didn’t play in this lawsuit?

218

Panish: Objection, attorney/client privilege.

219

Putnam: Is there anything you thought about other than the discussion with your attorneys that you consider in deciding to bring lawsuit?

220

Mrs. Jackson: Before the Conrad Murray trial? I don’t remember

221

There’s no dispute as to the dates of Murray’s criminal trial, Panish said.

222

Putnam asked if she provided any documents to her attorneys to give to them (defendants)?

223

Panish: Objection — attorney-client privilege

224

Mrs. Jackson said “yes.” Putnam understood she was answering yes to him. “I’m not saying yes for you,” she responded. Everyone laughed.

225

At this point, Mrs. Jackson spoke quietly to the judge and judge decided to end the day short, since she was too tired to continue.

226

Mrs. Jackson will resume testimony on Monday at 9:30 am PT, with more cross examination. We hope to see you then! Have a great weekend!

Here is Alan Duke about Katherine Jackson’s testimony:

Michael Jackson’s mom: ‘I want to know what really happened’

By Alan Duke, CNN

July 20, 2013 — Updated 0036 GMT (0836 HKT)

  • Jackson matriarch Katherine Jackson: “A lot of the facts that have been said are not the truth”
  • Michael Jackson’s “not here to speak for himself,” his mother says
  • “My son was a very good person,” Jackson’s mother testifies
  • Expert says Jackson would have earned $1.5 billion from touring and sponsorship

Los Angeles (CNN) – Michael Jackson’s mother told jurors she filed a wrongful death lawsuit against AEG Live “because I want to know what really happened to my son.”

Katherine Jackson, likely the final witness as her lawyers conclude their wrongful death case against the pop icon’s last concert promoter, began her testimony Friday and will conclude it Monday in a Los Angeles court.

“The most difficult thing is to sit here in the court and listen to all the bad things they say about my son,” Jackson testified.

The 83-year-old matriarch of the world’s most famous entertainment family sat on the front row in the small courtroom for most of the 51 previous days of testimony.

“A lot of the facts that have been said are not the truth,” she said. She said contrary to what an AEG Live executive wrote in an e-mail as Jackson prepared for his comeback concerts in 2009, her son was not lazy.

But she especially objected to an e-mail from AEG parent company’s general counsel that called Jackson “a freak” on the same day his company’s top executives were going to his house to sign the “This Is It” tour contract.

“He’s not here to speak for himself,” his mother said. She said she would “try my best” to speak for the pop icon.

Jurors leaned forward and listened closely during Jackson’s testimony and as her lawyer showed them video of her son performing as a child.

The lawsuit filed by Katherine Jackson and on behalf of the singer’s three children contends AEG Live is liable for the death of Jackson because it hired, retained or supervised Dr. Conrad Murray. The doctor was convicted of involuntary manslaughter.

AEG Live argues it was Jackson, not their company, who chose and controlled Murray, who admitted giving Jackson nightly infusions of a surgical anesthetic the coroner ruled killed him. Its executives had no way of knowing about the dangerous treatments Murray was giving Jackson in the privacy of his bedroom, AEG Live lawyers contend.

“Why are you here?” Jackson lawyer Brian Panish asked Katherine

“Because I want to know what really happened to my son,” she said. “And that’s why I am here.”

Panish asked Jackson how it made her feel to have been asked probing and personal questions about her family by AEG Live lawyer Marvin Putnam during a dozen hours of deposition testimony.

“It makes me feel real bad, because my son was a very good person,” she said. “He loved everybody, he gave to charity, he was in the Guinness Book of World Records for giving to charity.”

Putnam faces the challenge of not appearing unkind to Katherine Jackson while also trying to discredit her testimony.

“Forget it,” she said as she stopped before answering Putnam’s question about why she initially included, and later dropped show director Kenny Ortega as a defendant in her lawsuit.

“Forget what ma’am?” Putnam asked.

Jackson remained silent for about a minute, staring back at Putnam.

Would it help to reread the question, he asked.

“No, it wouldn’t be helpful,” Jackson answered curtly.

The judge finally ordered the question stricken from the record because the answer involved privileged discussions with her lawyers.

Jackson returned to the stand after the lunch break but she told the judge she was tired after just a few more minutes of questioning by Putnam. The judge sent jurors home two hours early and will allow Katherine Jackson to resume her testimony Monday morning.

If jurors decide that AEG Live is liable in Jackson’s death, they could award damages based on the loss of the mother’s and children’s relationship with him and the amount of money he was unable to earn because his life was cut short.

The wrongful death trial is about to get a lot uglier, if defense lawyers live up to the promise of their opening statements.

AEG Live lawyers this week brought up the child molestation charges against Jackson and the 2002 incident in which the pop star “dangled” his infant son on a Berlin hotel balcony.

Touring till 66?

Paris Jackson made another appearance in the trial this week — via a video of her deposition in March. Jurors saw a clip of AEG Live lawyer Putnam asking the 15-year-old what her father told her about his “This Is It” tour:

Putnam: “Did he explain to you how long the tour was going to last?”

Paris: “I assume a long time since it was a world tour, but those usually last a long time”

Putnam: “How did you understand it was a world tour?”

Paris: “Because he told us.”

Putnam: “What did he tell you?”

Paris: “That we were going around the world on tour.”

Certified public accountant Arthur Erk, who has managed and audited the business affairs of many top artists, testified Wednesday that he is “reasonably certain” that Jackson would have performed 260 shows around the world as part of his “This Is It” tour. He would have earned $890 million over the three years of concerts in Europe, Asia, South America, North America and Australia, Erk said.

Jackson would have earned at least $1.5 billion from touring, endorsements and sponsorships had he not died preparing for his comeback tour, Erk said.

AEG Live’s unprecedented sellout of 50 shows scheduled for London’s O2 Arena in 2009 and 2010 proved there was “pent-up demand” to see Jackson live, despite controversies that had tarnished his reputation in the years since his last tour in 1998, Erk said.

An e-mail from AEG Live CEO Randy Phillips said fans bought all 750,000 tickets put on sale for 31 shows in March 2009 in just two hours. Enough buyers were registered to sell out another 100 shows, Phillips wrote.

“Dude, we’re going to sell out a ridiculous amount of tickets,” AEG Live Co-CEO Paul Gongaware wrote in an e-mail. “We’ve got to get Mikey to add more shows.”

Jackson’s manager quickly approved another 19 shows, bringing the total to 50.

“Ten million tickets for the rest of the world? They would have gobbled up those tickets in seconds,” Erk said.

AEG Live lawyer Sabrina Strong challenged Erk’s estimate, asking if any other act has ever made as much money on a tour. “No,” he said. “This would have been a record-breaking world tour.”

Jackson would have done another 195 shows over four more world tours before retiring from the road at age 66, Erk predicted.

Putnam called Erk’s estimates “a creation, a fabrication” which suggests Jackson would have made more after age 50 that he did in the three tours during the “height of his fame.”

Jackson never intended to perform after the 50 shows in London, Putnam said.

AEG Live showed jurors a video clip of Katherine Jackson’s deposition, in which she said her son would joke that he “didn’t want to be moonwalking on stage at 50.”

“Michael said that quite a few years back and he was joking,” his mother explained in her testimony Friday. “I thought it was funny and most of us said things like that. I used to think 50 was very old.”

In fact, Jackson was 50 when he signed a three-year contract with AEG Live for his comeback tour, which would have likely included his famous moonwalk dance steps as he performed “Billie Jean.”

“We announced that we’re going to have one tour in London, that’s what was announced, and it was called ‘This Is It,’ meaning in London, this show is it,” he said. “This show is it. This is the last thing he’s ever going to do. As a result of this being his final performance ever, to be at the O2 in London, there was enormous response, understandably, and therefore we sold 50 shows.”

With the Jackson case ending — which Putnam called “ridiculous” — “now we’re going to start to show what actually occurred here,” he said.

No Conrad Murray testimony

AEG Live’s defense team confirmed Wednesday that they would not be calling Murray to testify.

“I have no intention of calling him myself, unless it’s requested, your honor,” Putnam said, replying to the judge’s question about his plans.

Until now, AEG Live lawyers have suggested they might call Murray, who is serving a four-year jail sentence for involuntary manslaughter, to the witness stand.

Murray’s lawyer gave the Jackson and AEG Live lawyers a sworn statement from the doctor before the trial began stating that he would invoke his constitutional protection against self-incrimination by refusing to answer questions if subpoenaed.

See you in September

Jurors, who were told when the trial started in April that it could end sometime in August, appeared unfazed when Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Yvette Palazuelos told them this week that it is likely to extend into mid-September. Putnam estimated this week that he needs about 30 days in court to present his defense after the plaintiffs rest.

The jurors often have laughed and smiled in reaction to testimony and the interplay between Jackson lead lawyer Brian Panish, the judge and the AEG defense team.

For example, when Palazuelos ordered Panish to turn around and face the bench while AEG attorney Sabrina Strong cross-examined Erk, jurors seemed amused. Panish, whose seat was just in front of Strong’s lectern, had been looking directly up at her at close range.

There were no laughs in the hallway after court on Tuesday when Panish and Putnam exchanged words. The two lawyers were standing about 15 feet apart, each talking to reporters, when they began directing their words at each other. The court clerk interrupted the heated conversation, threatening to summon deputies.

Palazuelos lectured the lawyers in her chambers the next morning and imposed new rules that bar them from speaking to journalists in the hallway.

http://edition.cnn.com/2013/07/18/showbiz/jackson-death-trial/index.html?sr=sharebar_twitter

IT’S NOT YET TOO LATE TO SEND YOUR $5 HERE:

http://teammichaeljackson.com/archives/8530


Filed under: AEG THE HORRIBLE, Jacksons vs. AEG Tagged: AEG, Katherine Jackson, Michael Jackson

Jacksons – AEG trial DAYS 53 and 55. KATHERINE JACKSON and DR. FARSHCHIAN

$
0
0

There is so much going on at the AEG trial now that it may look a bit strange to return to Mrs. Jackson’s testimony on Monday this week. However there are reasons for going back.

HAT OFF TO KATHERINE

First of all I want to express my admiration for the sharp and combative way Katherine answered Putnam’s questions – this was something I never expected of a gentle woman like her. TeamMJ called her a lioness defending her cub and our reader Sina also applauded her for her courage:

My impression of Katherine Jackson’s testimony is that she was fearless and stood strong against the tricks and twists of a shrewd lawyer who was out on her blood. I applaud her courage. It was not the strongest testimony, but considering her age, emotions, the pressure and many inappropriate questions, she did very well. She could have given a scripted answer when asked about waiving her rights on restitution, but she spoke from her heart and if you do there are no wrong answers. Most important, she was consistent, there were no significant discrepancies between her deposition and testimony and she was sharp on the questions that really matter: who hired Murray, who killed Michael and AEGs responsibility.

Well, to me Katherine’s testimony looks like a very strong one. Katherine opened up as a completely new person – at the age of 83, with all the memory and concentration problems that come with the age, and with only high school to her credit she indeed looked like a fearless lioness able to stand up to a seasoned lawyer like Putnam who wanted to confuse, trap, catch in a lie and coerce her into something he wanted to hear.

Katherine Jackson stood her ground no matter what, asked Putnam inconvenient questions like “What does it have to do with the death of one son?” and occasionally her testimony looked like it was she who was examining him. Her courage and ability to speak her mind were absolutely awesome to me, especially since I never expected to see this strong side of Michael’s usually gentle and humble mother.

Now we know who Michael inherited his strength from.

Monday July 22, 2013 DAY 53

Everybody must have read the second part of Katherine’s testimony by now but just for the record let me provide the ABC tweets again with occasional comments on my part:

  • Hello from the courthouse in downtwon LA. Day 53 of Jackson Family vs AEG trial just about to begin. This is Week 13 of the trial.
  • Michael Jackson’s mother, Katherine, is set to take the stand again today to resume cross examination.
  • Mrs. Jackson spent a few hours on the stand on Friday detailing the humble beginning of MJ’s life and how he rose to fame.
  • Session has not started yet. As a reminder, we can’t live tweet, per judge’s ruling. We’ll bring you all the coverage as soon as we can.
  • Our reporter Miriam Hernandez is in the courtroom. We are in the overflow room, where a lot of fans are.
  • The only witnesses remaining for the Jacksons are Kenny Ortega (who needs to come back for cross) and nanny Grace Rwamba.
  • They wanted to call Rwamba today, but they said she has a medical condition (lupus) that may prevent her from coming.
  • Judge Yvette Palazuelos asked AEG attorney Marvin Putnam again on Friday whether he intends to call Dr. Murray to testify.
  • Putnam responded on Friday he has no intention of calling him. Judge said there are several steps needed to bring an inmate to testify.
  • Judge told attorneys none of the steps have been taken yet, which means it’s probably very unlikely they’d be able to get Dr. Murray in.
  • Katherine Jackson back on the stand for cross examination. Session began at 9:55 am PT. Marvin Putnam, for AEG, doing the questioning.
  • Putnam explained to Mrs. Jackson about the discovery process, where both sides have to exchange documents related to the case.
  • Mrs. Jackson said MJ would give her money in cash, but she would not write down the amounts.
  • The matriarch has a secretary, Janice Smith, who works for her for anywhere between 15-20 years. She has an office in Encino, CA.
  • Putnam asking about the house in Gary, Indiana. It’s been 44 years since she left and moved in to the Hayvenhurst house.
  • Mrs. Jackson lives now in a gated community in Calabasas. Hayvenhurst house is under renovation.
  • It was a gift, Mrs. Jackson said about the money she received from Michael. Putnam asked if she reported/recorded anywhere.
  • My son took care of me, food, shelter, clothes, Mrs. Jackson explained.
  • When he gave me cash, it was a gift, I didn’t think I needed to report to anyone, Mrs. Jackson said.
  • Putnam asked again if there was any record of the money MJ gave her. She replied she didn’t think she needed to.
  • Putnam asked if Mrs. Jackson had a bank account back in 2010 when she filed her lawsuit. She said she doesn’t recall. 

PEOPLE STOLE FROM HIM

  • Regarding Michael having money problems, Mrs. Jackson said : “My son made a lot of money, he had people working for him.”
  • Mrs. Jackson: Yes, I’ve heard from some people
  • Putnam: Where you aware MJ was having financial difficulties when he passed away?
  • They have been saying it for 15 years, Mrs. Jackson said. “People were taking money from him also, stealing I should say.”
  • Putnam: Who did you hear that from?
  • Mrs. Jackson: Just different people
  • Mrs. Jackson testified she heard stories about it.
  • She also said MJ told her too that people were making deals on his behalf.
  • They were being offered money under the table, that’s what I heard from my son, Mrs. Jackson testified.
  • And Mrs. Jackson asked: “What does this have to do with the death of my son?”

Here is a quote from Mrs. Jackson’s testimony:

Q.        So your son Michael   Jackson had told you over the years, people asked for money under the table when  they were making deals with him? A.        Not with him. Making deals for him, and the people they made deals with came back and told him.

Let me interrupt it for a moment. One of those people who told Michael the truth could be Jack Wishna, the man who brought him back from Ireland in December 2006. He also said there were people around Michael who were cutting deals without him knowing about it and since Jack Wishna is dead his words sound like a sort of a testimony to us:

 “Michael has a lot of people around him that cut deals and sometimes Michael doesn’t even know what those deals are,” he added. “So many people have been around him. At every turn it’s like he’s his worst enemy because of the people that are around him.” http://uk.eonline.com/news/133691/it-s-going-to-be-a-disaster-associate-says-jackson-was-too-weak-for-major-comeback

The ABC tweets again:

  • Putnam: You heard about MJ having money problems?
  • Mrs. Jackson: I heard for years Michael Jackson was broken and he wasn’t
  • Putnam: Did you ever ask MJ about having money problems?
  • Mrs. Jackson: No, because I didn’t believe it. Because he wasn’t.
  • Putnam asked about the damages Mrs. Jackson asked for in her lawsuit. MJ’s mother responded that he could ask her attorneys about it.
  • Putnam asked if Mrs. Jackson has been here most of the days over the past 12 weeks.
  • Putnam: Do you believe that your son is in any way responsible for his passing?
  • Mrs. Jackson: No I don’t
  • Putnam: You never believed your son had any part in his own death?
  • Mrs. Jackson: Correct!
  • Putnam: Do you believe your son MJ knew Dr. Murray was giving him Propofol?
  • Panish: Objection, calls for speculation
  • Putnam: Do you remember MJ asking for Propofol?
  • Panish: Calls for hearsay response
  • Putnam: Did you hear from the criminal trial that your son asked Dr. Murray to give him Propofol?
  • Mrs. Jackson: I have heard
  • Mrs. Jackson said she had not heard that MJ asked other doctors for Propofol. Putnam asked if that came to a surprise for her. She said yes.
  • Conrad Murray, even if he asked, he could’ve said no, Mrs. Jackson opined.
  • Putnam: Do you believe your son hired Dr. Murray?
  • Mrs. Jackson: No I don’t
  • Putnam: You heard testimony MJ hired Dr. Murray in Las Vegas?
  • Mrs Jackson: He had doctors for his children, I don’t know if it was Dr Murray
  • Putnam asked if MJ ever paid Dr. Murray. She answered it was to treat the children.
  • Putnam asked if she heard testimony from Prince saying he would give Dr. Murray stacks of money in a rubber band.
  • He didn’t say stacks, he measure with his fingers, Mrs. Jackson explained.
  • Mrs. Jackson said she doesn’t believe that MJ hired Dr. Murray because of what she’s been listening here in court.
  • She said from hearing the emails, AEG said they had hired him and that Randy Phillips went on TV saying they hired him.
  • Mrs. Jackson: I had heard they had hired and there was the doctor there so I thought MJ had hired him, not knowing the facts.
  • Putnam asked how she remembers it when she said her memory wasn’t very good.
  • I didn’t say I didn’t remember anything, I said I’m 83, I would ‘t remember everything, Mrs. Jackson responded.
  • Mrs Jackson said that’s all that’s been talked about in the trial and that she remembers emails, Phillips’ interview saying AEG hired Murray
  • Putnam: Do you recall why you said your son hired the doctor and that your son could’ve prevented his own death?
  • I don’t think he could’ve prevented his own death, Mrs. Jackson testified. “I just said I thought he hired the doctor. I do recall that.”
  • Mrs. Jackson said she can’t recall exactly what was said in the Dateline interview, but she does remember saying MJ hired the doctor.
  • Mrs. Jackson said she had not heard about Dr. Murray prior to MJ’s death. Her son did not discuss what treatments he was having with her.
  • Putnam: Prior to your son’s death, did you know your son had a doctor spending the night at the house?
  • Mrs. Jackson: No
  • Putnam: Did you ever have conversation with your grandchildren prior to trial about the doctor spending the night at the house? She said no
  • Putnam asked if Prince testified a doctor was spending the nights at the house.
  • Mrs. Jackson: I don’t remember him saying that
  • Putnam: Do you remember him (Prince) saying he (the doctor) spent 6 nights a week?
  • Mrs. Jackson: No, I don’t remember that
  • Putnam asked Mrs. Jackson’s search for the truth and if she thought it would be important to know whether the doctor spending the nights.
  • It would’ve been important but I told you I didn’t talk to my grandchildren about that, Mrs. Jackson responded.
  • Putnam asked if Mrs. Jackson talked to her grandchildren about Dr. Murray treating MJ in a locked, upstairs bedroom. She answered no.

RESTITUTION

  • Putnam: You do believe Dr. Murray has some responsibility for your son’s death?
  • Mrs. Jackson: Of course
  • Putnam asked Mrs. Jackson if Dr. Murray was convicted in the criminal trial. She said yes.
  • He asked if the doctor is now in jail. “I hope he is,” she responded.
  • Putnam inquired about Mrs. Jackson asking the District Attorney to drop the $100 million restitution against Dr. Murray.
  • Mrs. Jackson said yes, that Dr. Murray has children and has no money.
  • Putnam: You asked the DA to drop the $100 million restitution claim against Dr. Murray?
  • Because I felt his children needed him to take care of them, she explained. “He didn’t have any money.”
  • Mrs. Jackson: I asked them to drop it because of his children, he has quite a few children, 7 or 8, I don’t know.
  • Mrs. Jackson said she believes the DA may have dropped the $100 million restitution claim.
  • Putnam: Did you drop the restitution claim so you could file this lawsuit?
  • Mrs. Jackson: No

A quote from the testimony:

Q. And so when you learned he didn’t have any money, you asked the district attorney to drop the $100 million restitution claim?

A. I asked him to drop it because of his children. He had quite a few children, seven or eight, I heard. I don’t know.

Q. And after you asked the district attorney to drop the $100 million restitution claim, did the state of California then dropt that part of their claim against Dr. Conrad Murray?

A.Uhm, I didn’t find all that out, but I imagine they might have.

Q. Well, you were in the criminal court, weren’t you, ma’am?

A. Yes, I was.

Q. And do you recall it being announced in the criminal court that you were dropping that part of the claim?

A. No, I didn’t hear it in criminal court.

Q. Okay. Mrs. Jackson, did you drop your restitution claim because of the effect it would have on this lawsuit?

A. No. I never gave it a thought.

This restitution point struck me as something terribly familiar. So it was in AEG’s perception of that story that the so-called fans who accused Katherine of being “greedy” were drawing their inspiration?

But look here, first of all it was the District Attorney David Walgren who made that restitution claim against Murray (and not Katherine) and second, she filed a lawsuit against AEG at least a year before Conrad Murray’s trial, so how could dropping monetary claims against Murray affect the suit against AEG made a year earlier?

And I absolutely believe that being a mother of nine children Katherine felt sorry for Conrad Murray’s kids who should not be held responsible for what their father did to Michael. This move to sympathize with them is very much in Katherine’s character.

THE DAMAGES CLAIMED

The ABC tweets do not go over the next point discussed at a sidebar — the sum of the economic damages claimed, however it’s top important to look into it as it is the most fundamental question of the whole case.

All of us remember the hysteria the media went into over the sum of $40billion allegedly claimed by Mrs. Jackson. Now I realize that this hysteria was also instigated by AEG. It seems that those billions were some preliminary calculation made by Katherine’s lawyers which she did not even see and never signed. The judge agreed that Katherine had not seen it and could not testify about it.

Mr. Boyle for the Plaintiffs explained that all questions concerning the economic damages should be addressed only to the lawyers as they are the ones who are making the estimation. He compared questions he expected Putnam to ask about the damages with questions to a mother of a child in a medical malpractice case, “what are the factual things that the doctor did wrong  that”, or a in a products liability case, “what are the facts that is the defective design in the aviation cooling system?” Both questions require a legal conclusion and cannot be asked of a plaintiff.

This is why the Jacksons’ lawyers referred to a certain Rifkind vs. Superior Court case where the plaintiff was not a 83-year old housewife but a lawyer, but even in his case the court ruled that  the plaintiff should not explain the damages claimed and the matter should be left to outside experts only.

Putnam disagreed, so the judge decided to put off that discussion until both sides provided her with a brief on this point. This is why all questions about it were put aside and Putnam reserved for him the right to summon Mrs. Jackson once again.

To me as a layperson this sidebar explained that:

1)     Initially the Jacksons’ lawyer must have miscalculated the sum, however AEG immediately took advantage of it and trumpeted it all over the world as the damages claimed by that ‘greedy woman’

2)     that ‘greedy woman’ never signed that statement of damages and never even saw it

3)     all questions to Katherine Jackson about her not providing some financial documents during discovery are the usual AEG’s trick to misinform the jury because the plaintiff’s accountants were already subpoenaed for 60,000 documents to AEG regarding MJ’s financial condition. So we can expect a full picture of it disclosed to us in the future.

Here is the sidebar and please correct me if I misunderstood something here:

Q.           …I saw that in your attorney’s opening statements, he talked about the idea of it being between $1.5 and $1.7 billion?

Mr. Panish:         Your honor, first of all, that’s not what I said. And number two, this is improper questioning of a plaintiff under Rifkind vs. Superior court, getting into factual contentions of a plaintiff. If we need to go to sidebar, I have the cases. These are not appropriate question. Plaintiff can’t say how much money they’re asking for. Not something a plaintiff does. The jury decides that.

The judge:           Okay. Let’s go to sidebar and see the cases you’re talking about.

Mr. Panish:         Yes. Sure

Mr. Panish:         First of all, I mean, for example, asking Mrs. Jackson these questions on discovery, have you provided documents, we already heard in the cross-examination of Mr. Erk about this 60,000 documents that AEG subpoenaed from all accountants regarding Michael Jackson’s financial condition. So now for them to keep going in with this 83-year-old witness, “did you have this document?” “did you have this document?” it’s not appropriate.

Number two, factual contentions of a party are things that a lawyer does, not what a party does, and that’s what the Rifkind case is. And we went through this in the deposition extensively with Mr. Putnam when he was asking questions, “give us the factual basis for this,” “give us the contention for that,” and that’s not appropriate. And the case is Rifkind vs. Superior court.

The judge:           I need to look at it.

Mr. Putnam:        Yes. The difference of the time, your honor, because

Mr. Panish:         I just wanted to give the citation of the case for the record.

The judge:           okay.

Mr. Panish:         22 cal.app.4th 1255. Rifkind vs. Superior court. 1994

Mr. Putnam:        And what the case makes clear, your honor we didn’t understand at the time how he could make a contention, couldn’t understand what the plaintiff’s factual contentions were. And so on the first day when we had her for a couple hours, they wouldn’t let her answer all of these questions. And I indicated, “you know what? I’m going to have to talk to the court so I can understand what the basis of her claim is.” And they said, “Rifkind, Rifkind, Rifkind,” and so we went off and read it and came back and explained to them that’s not what the case represents, your honor. What the case represents is not a very difficult idea, legally. I can’t ask for the legal basis. I can’t aks her what the legal contentions that you’re making here. I understand that, and I’m not asking those. What I’m asking of her, your honor, is something I’m very much allowed to do, which is to find out what her basis is factually. And in fact, your honor, if you recall, we had an argument about this very aspect that we’re doing right now, which is the aspect of her damages claim at the beginning of this case where you asked us to come in with briefings. Ms. Chang argued it. We came and talked about these things. And you ruled twice at that time. And I can give you the cites of the trial transcript if you like.

The judge:           That’s okay.

Mr. Putnam:        Okay. But no, of course you can go into that arena. They can ask counter questions, but we can go into that.

Mr. Panish:         You never ruled that.

The judge:           Let me see Rifkind.

Mr. Panish:         Sure. And, your honor, what he’s going to try to do now, I think, is get into the statement of damages, which she’s never seen.

The judge:           Sound like it’s dealing with depositions.

Mr. Panish:         Testimony.

The judge:           Trial?

Mr. Putnam:        No.

Mr. Panish:         Deals with the testimony. Same thing. Deposition testimony, trial testimony. I mean, this is totally inappropriate. It’s a lawyer’s work product of what is claimed, what are the contentions, what’s the complaint. That’s the lawyer, not the client. And I’m going to go next. If he finishes all this, then I’m going to go up on the stand, and we’re going to discuss it all.

Ms. Chang:          It basically stand for the proposition that someone who is a non-lawyer plaintiff cannot be asked the basis for bringing legal claims and why, and what her factual understanding is, for the same and simple reason that plaintiffs never know. And it’s like an unfair trap by a lawyer to say that they didn’t understand or whatever. And she, of all people, hired attorneys, trusted the attorneys to do their thing.

Mr. Panish:         “And what is your claim for negligence?” it’s the same thing. The plaintiff doesn’t know they

The judge:           That would be asking a legal question.

Mr. Panish:         But it’s the same thing. What is your claim for damages? That’s a legal basis.

Mr. Boyle:           Here’s the distinction, your honor. They try to get around this by saying, “oh, we’re just asking for her factual contentions.” If this were a malpractice case, that would be like asking the mother of the child, “well, what are the factual things that the doctor did wrong that” you know what I mean? Or if this were a product liability case, “what are the facts that is the defective design in the aviation cooling system?”

The judge:           that’s calling for expert.

Mr. Boyle:           Right.

Mr. Panish:         So is this damages. “What are your claimed economic damages?’ expert. Same thing. Legal conclusion. Interesting, Mr. Briggs wouldn’t answer any of these questions, saying “legal conclusion”, their expert. It’s asking for legal conclusion of a percipient plaintiff, a non-expert plaintiff. And that’s what that case interesting, in that case, the witness was a lawyer that was being deposed. And the court says it doesn’t matter if you’re a lawyer or what you are. That’s the work product and the legal contentions of the lawyer, not of the party.

Ms. Chang:          And I want to clarify. The argument that I made at the beginning of the trial was for them to be permitted to read from a document that was really not filed with the court. And the purpose of it was just to give noticed in the even of a default, and that it was never intended to be used as an affirmative pleading in the case. That’s what I argued and made a record of. And we overruled on that, and he was able to use that $40 billion on

Mr. Putnam:        and the reason, your honor, that it was overruled

The judge:           Let’s hear the question first.

Mr. Putnam:        is the case law didn’t support the argument. Yes, I can go through the case law.

Ms. Chang:          We don’t need to argue that.

Mr. Putnam:        It says completely the opposite of the arguments made. What I don’t understand is, we have had two different figures in this case: there’s the $42 billion figure, and now we have $1,5 billion that happened within a span of four months.

The judge:           What was the $40 million?

Mr. Putnam:        On December 3rd, 2010.

Mr. Panish:         It was a statement of damages that she’s never seen.

The judge:           Yeah.

Mr. Panish:         That’s totally inappropriate. So what they’re trying to say

Mr. Putnam:        that’s not inappropriate.

Mr. Panish:         Can I finish please? Well, the statement of damages she’s never seen says this, now it says this; therefore, something must have happened. Now they are getting into legal conclusions.

The judge:           If that’s where you’re going, that sounds like you’re asking legal questions about a statement of damages that the lawyers file.

Mr. Putnam:        But the lawyers

The judge:           that she doesn’t know anything about.

Mr. Panish:         It’s not even filed.

Mr. Boyle:           Not even filed.

Mr. Putnam:        What is says, the case law says about that very thing, okay? That because it is an element of what they’re saying they believe their damages claim is, and they are an agent of the person. If you look at it, it says, “Katherine Jackson hereby demands,” that’s what it says.

Mr. Panish:         She doesn’t sign it.

Mr. Putnam: and therefore I’m able to ask, “are you aware of this fact?” and that is clear. And the reason the case law says and makes it very clear why is because of the fact that if something is so out of whack this is what the case law says –

Ms. Chang:          It does not.

Mr. Putnam:        is so out of whack with reality, the jury is allowed to assess that.

Mr. Panish:         What case is that?

The judge:           Here’s what I’m going to allow you to do: you’re going to skip over this portion of your questioning, and I want a brief on it.

Ms. Chang:          Okay.

Mr. Putnam:        Okay.

Mr. Panish:         And I want to know the name of the case he keeps saying that says this. What’s the name of the case?

Mr. Putnam:        The one that you cited on the record.

Mr. Panish:         What is it?

Mr. Putnam:        If you will let me finish, I will. And if you look at what cited at the time of this argument with Ms. Chang, we went through

Ms. Change:        I cited the case.

Mr. Putnam:        and then we came back with other cases that were cited, and they were cited by Ms. Strong at the time.

The judge:           Okay. So, fine. I want a briefing on the issue. Let’s skip over this.

Mr. Putnam:        I’ll call her back.

The judge:           I’m sure you have a lot of other questions. But I want it in writing so I can consider it, okay?

Ms. Chang:          Yes.

Mr. Putnam:        I have one more thing for the record.

The judge:           And okay.

Mr. Putnam:        I also want to note for the sake of the record, Mr. Panish indicated several times he’s going to call himself in reference to that. And I’d like to note we’ve done actual research. Should he call himself in this matter, he does waive the areas he testifies about.

Mr. Panish:         Good. Looking forward to you cross-examining me.

The following proceeding was heard in open court, so the jurors must have heard all of it. Depending on the judge’s decision on the damages issue we may or may not see Katherine Jackson on the stand again.

INTERVENTIONS

I totally understand Katherine when she says she did not know what to believe about the so-called Michael’s ‘drugs’ – what the media trumpeted about was one thing, what her children knew or imagined about MJ was another thing and the truth was something totally different from the first two.

Sometime in the 2000s Michael relapsed into his dependency on Demerol again and was determined to fight it, however the help his family was offering him in this respect left much to be desired – it was rather blunt, inefficient and often misplaced. I think that the method of unannounced arrivals and cavalier attacks they practiced was even insulting for a man who knew of his problem and was seeking really qualified medical help to be able to cope with it.

As we know now from Dr. Farshchian’s deposition on July 24th Michael approached him for help and they were going through a well-planned program of 12 steps which stemmed from asking God to help him get strength to battle his problem:

  • Dr. Farshchian: Each of the steps is somewhat connected of asking God to help you get strength to battle addiction.

Imagine that you are meditating or praying to God for help and suddenly an unannounced crowd of people arrives to gaze at you together with “someone whom Janet knew” and who was not even a specialist in drug dependency problems, and you will realize what a shock it must have been for Michael to see them. Especially since they were evidently planning not just talk but grab him and place in some rehab.

The situation described by Putnam and Mrs. Jackson, when they arrived unannounced at Neverland in 2002 and found that Michael was fine, must have indeed been a tremendous embarrassment for both sides. I can imagine how upset Michael was by that intrusion and their total inability to understand him and the delicate way he needed to help with his problems.

Putnam questioned Mrs. Jackson about that intervention, but first he asked her about her conversation with Michael in 2007 in Las Vegas. The ABC tweets continue:

  • Putnam asked if Mrs. Jackson ever saw MJ under the influence of any drug. She said no, that it’s something she never saw during his lifetime
  • She would show up at the house unannounced and said she never saw her son “loopy”.
  • Putnam: Did you ever speak with your son on the phone when he was out of it?
  • Mrs. Jackson: No. Out of what?
  • Putnam asked if Mrs. Jackson’s children told her MJ was under the influence of something. She said yes.
  • A couple of children came to me and told me they had heard about it, Mrs. Jackson said. She had conversation with MJ about it in Las Vegas.
  • Putnam asked Mrs. Jackson is she remembers her son’s criminal trial in 2005. She said yes, and that she attended the trial every day.
  • Putnam inquired if MJ left the country after the trial. She said yes. When MJ came back he lived in Las Vegas never lived in Neverland again
  • Mrs. Jackson spoke with Michael about what she heard of him using prescription drugs.
  • I’ve heard that something had happened to him, Mrs. Jackson described.
  • Putnam: When you said that, he denied it, right?
  • Mrs. Jackson: Yes he did
  • I was his mother, I imagined he’d deny it, Mrs. Jackson explained. “No child is going to admit it, if I heard something bad about them.”
  • Mrs. Jackson said she didn’t know MJ was taking pain pills, she couldn’t prove it, that’s what she had heard.
  • Mrs. Jackson: It didn’t surprise me, I’m the mother, he would not want his mother to worry about him.
  • Putnam: If you knew your son was going to deny it, why did you ask him?
  • Mrs. Jackson: I’m not answering that question. Because to me it doesn’t make sense. I didn’t know he was going to deny it.
  • It’s because he didn’t want me to worry, Mrs. Jackson said. “I just talked to him about it.”
  • Mrs. Jackson to Putnam: I don’t think it’s that serious that you have to drill it like that on me.
  • Mrs. Jackson: My child, he respected his mother he didn’t want to hurt if it was bad
  • Mrs Jackson: He was still my child, I’m still his mother and he wants to hold his respect for me
  • Putnam: He wasn’t a child but 50 years old?
  • Mrs. Jackson: You’re just trying to confuse me so that you can come back with something.
  • Mrs. Jackson: You do understand (the answer) and you keep asking the same question
  • Putnam: Has there ever been a time you believe your son was abusing prescription drugs?
  • Mrs. Jackson: No
  • I believe he was taking it, but I don’t believe he was abusing it Mrs Jackson said. “I just asked him the question, I wanted to make sure”

About the 2002 intervention:  

  • Even tough Mrs. Jackson didn’t believe MJ was abusing prescription drugs she was part of an intervention at Neverland.
  • She doesn’t remember all the siblings present, but probably Janet, Rebbie and Randy were there.
  • She said there was a person who came along that Janet brought specialized in intervention.
  • Mrs. Jackson said she doesn’t believe MJ knew why they were there.
  • Putnam: Do you recall this taking place in 2002?
  • Mrs. Jackson: Yes
  • Putnam asked if MJ was mad they came for an intervention.
  • Mrs. Jackson: Yes, because when we got there, there was nothing wrong with him
  • We asked if he was okay, he got upset and we didn’t talk about it, Mrs. Jackson explained.
  • He didn’t deny anything, he was ok, Mrs. Jackson said. There was no deep discussion, we got there and he was ok, he was upset.”
  • Mrs. Jackson: It was kind of embarrassing, because they didn’t see anything.
  • Putnam asked if Mrs. Jackson saw him upset. “If I said he was upset, I did see it,” she responded.
  • Putnam: After he got upset, did he say to you “I’m not on it, I’m not on anything?”
  • Mrs. Jackson: He didn’t say that
  • Putnam played part of Mrs. Jackson’s deposition where she said she knew MJ was upset, by the way he talked, said “I’m not on it,” that’s all
  • Putnam asked if at the intervention MJ denied he was on influence of prescription drugs?
  • Mrs. Jackson: To tell you the truth, I don’t know
  • Putnam: Do you remember in your deposition you didn’t know whether to believe your son at all?
  • Mrs. Jackson said she was upset with Putnam during deposition. “I was just tired of you asking the same question 50 times in different ways”
  • I knew he was on prescription drugs, but he was not abusing it, Mrs. Jackson said.
  • After intervention at Neverland in 2002 Putnam asked if her mind changed about MJ abusing drugs. She said she didn’t know one way or another

DR. FARSHCHIAN

Dr. Farshchian on Dr. Drew's program: "Michael Jackson was grossly misunderstood"

Dr. Farshchian on Dr. Drew’s program: “Michael Jackson was grossly misunderstood”  Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Ky3wMiBE8A

From Dr. Farshchian’s deposition we’ve learned that Michael decided to seriously address his problem after Blanket was born:

  • Dr. Farshchian said when MJ’s third child, Blanket, was just born, there was ‘a monkey on his back’, he didn’t want to do it anymore. Monkey on his back was Demerol use, Dr. Farshchian said.

Blanket was born on February 22, 2002, so it was evidently around that time that the anti-drug treatment began. And since the Jacksons arranged their intervention also in 2002 it must have been approximately the same time when Dr. Farshchian was already treating Michael.

He was Michael’s doctor in the period of 2001-2003. The treatment started with the doctor taking care of Michael’s sprained ankle, but already on the second visit Michael told him that he had a problem with Demerol and was trying to get off it.

The ABC tweets for July 24 DAY 55 when Dr. Farshchian testified say:

  • Dr. Farshchian treated MJ in April 2001 and stopped in 2003. ‘I was one of his doctors,” he said.
  • Dr. Farshchian said MJ was having an issue with his ankle, he was supposed to performed at MadisonSquareGarden, had to rehearse.
  • Dr. Farshchian:  And he had an ankle issue that was more like a sprained ankle that was not healing and he had to continue to dance on it.
  • He made an appointment like everybody else, Dr. Farshchian said.
  • Putnam asked if MJ wanted to get off drugs, if that happened at the hotel in a second meeting with the doctor. He said yes.
  • Putnam: Do you remember the first time he told you he wanted to clean himself up from drugs?
  • He was trying to get off Demerol, Dr. Farshchian said. MJ told him he had a problem with the drug.
  • Dr. Farshchian said MJ’s main concern was his kids, always his kids, I’d do for my kids, and to spend more time with his kids.
  • At that time, Dr. Farshchian said he wasn’t following MJ on the media. At that point, to me he was just a regular patient.
  • Dr Farshchian: When I got to know him I visited him at the hotel, read a little about him on the internet, then realized was ongoing problem
  • Putnam: Did MJ tell you he was addicted to Demerol?
  • Dr. Farshchian: Not in certain words
  • Putnam: Did he seek treatment with you?
  • Dr. Farshchian: Eventually
  • Dr. Farshchian: To treat Michael for that problem, I thought that because he travelled quite a bit he needed something to be on him.
  • I chose Naltrexone, Dr. Fashchian testified. The drug inhibits the effects of the narcotics, if you take it it stops giving you the euphoria
  • Dr. Farshchian said he implanted more than one patch of the drug in MJ. It normally lasts 60-90 days in the body.
  • MJ had patch implanted 5 times. Dr. Farshchian said in training in family medicine, he learned about psychiatry and drug dependency.
  • The doctor said carrying an implant in you, you carry a risk of infection. That could be a reason they don’t do it that much.
  • Dr. Farshchian said MJ’s skin would have allergy from the patch, he wouldn’t be very comfortable with it.
  • Dr. Farshchian: It’s usually placed in the abdomen lower than belly button, right or left side, and removed after 90 days.
  • 7/21/02 record — sent more information about Buprenex, since did not get any respond (sic) from him and his attempt to intervene
  • MJ had some sort of infection on his leg, he was going to Germany at the time, so Dr Farshchian went with him for treatment of his condition

Putnam evidently tried to compromise Mrs. Jackson’s testimony with the help of Dr. Farshchian’s deposition and one of the ways to do it was to ask the doctor about the intervention and its time – he wondered if it was in the spring of 2002. Dr. Farshchian said it could have been after or before and was not sure. He also recalled that he spoke to Mrs. Jackson in Neverland at Christmas time in 2002. He said she saw Michael’s implant and was happy about it:

  • Dr. Farshchian: Once at Neverland Michael showed his mother the implant. She was very happy about it.

Since the first implant was used sometime in October 2002 Michael must have shown the implant to his mother at Christmas time and not during the unannounced intervention Putnam was asking her about, so what she described to Putnam as an embarrassing situation must have been perfectly true – there was no talk then about any implants because all of them saw that he was fine.

Below are Dr. Farshchian’s records from October 2002 to July 2003 from the moment the serious treatment started up to the point when the patient “was sober for almost 9 months and was good with 12 step program”.

From these records we also find out the devastating news that that there must have been a necrosis to Michael’s nose and they had to take away part of his nose tissues. Goodness gracious, what terrible hardship Michael went through in his life… A mere fraction of it would be enough for a hundred people to go insane after so much suffering… And he had to endure it all alone …

In fact I half-expected something of the kind. Lupus patients are not recommended plastic surgery exactly for the reason that the wound would not heal and there is a huge danger of a necrosis. So first Hoefflin stretched his scalp for some 9 years or so, and got him totally dependent on Demerol as a result, and then Michael’s nose tissues also suffered because Hoefflin wouldn’t listen to Klein’s remonstrations about Michael’s lupus?

And as if all of it was not enough at the end of the anti-drug treatment Michael was arrested in 2003 on the bogus charges of child molestation. However even that did not make Michael resume drugs as Dr. Farshchian said, so this is how determined he was to get rid of them!

Here is a quote from his records according to ABC tweets:

  • 10/20/02 record — patient states he need some help him with his addiction problem.
  • Record: He does not wish to go to an outpatient rehab facility despite the pressure from family. Discussed with him option of Naltrexone
  • Dr. Farshchian said MJ was adamant about not going to rehab facility. He was concerned about his privacy and paparazzi.
  • 11/04/02 record — MJ’s weight was 128 — pre-procedure, cut the skin, insert implant chip of Naltrexone.
  • Dr. Farshchian used local anesthesia with lidocaine 1%, done as outpatient in doctor’s office in Miami.
  • 11/06/02 record — phone call, states he’s doing well tolerating minimum agitation, little insomnia
  • Dr. Farshchian said it was a 10 hour production to go from Neverland to Miami. MJ said he was going to see a psychologist.
  • MJ was very private with everything, Dr. Farshchian said. At the time, he was complaining of insomnia. He was seeing a herbologist for it.
  • Dr. Farshchian said MJ always had trouble sleeping. “To me his insomnia was caused, possibly, you have this area inside the nose called turbinates, if you reduced it’s called empty nose syndrome, to me that was the cause of that.
  • Putnam: Parts of his nose were missing?
  • Dr. Farshchian: Portions of his nose were taken out.
  • Two days later, MJ reported good nights.
  • 11/26/02 record — ankle wound is better, but he had taken the implant out by a physician at home, wishes to do another implant
  • Dr. Farshchian said Michael had a local doctor who didn’t know what the patch was and removed it. MJ would itch it, had some skin rash.
  • Michael really wanted to do this, he came back to get the procedure done, Dr. Farshchian said.
  • 11/26/02 record — second procedure of Naltrexone
  • 11/27/02 — no nausea, vomiting, diarrhea
  • Naltrexone implant: continue current treatment, patient sober x 20 days
  • 11/27/02 record: Abdomen implant well placed
  • 11/29/02 record — feels very good, sleeping well. No sign of opiate withdrawal.
  • Dr. Farshchian: My practice is completely orthopedic regeneration. He said he treats arthritis and orthopedic conditions.
  • Patient sober, now going over the 12 steps with him
  • 12/2/02 record — feel very good, sleeping well
  • Dr. Farshchian: Each of the steps is somewhat connected of asking God to help you get strength to battle addiction.
  • There was a period of time MJ stayed with Dr. Farshchian. He stayed over two times, the children one time.
  • He lives in North Miami Beach, BayHarborIsland. Grace Rwamba might’ve stayed at the house as well.
  • Dr. Farshchian said he converted his garage into a bedroom for MJ. He never treated MJ at the house.
  • 12/4/02 record: Narcan implant at its place. Exercised the 12 steps with him
  • 1/20/03 — patient returns for another implant, been sober for more than 2 months, states been following the 12 step program. Weight: 135 lbs
  • 4/3/03: patient returns for another implant, sober for almost 6 months following 12 step program at least once week with private social worker
  • 7/2/03 — patient returned for another implant, sober for almost 9 months, good with 12 step program
  • Patient can follow up with local physician at this point. Dr. Farshchian said he thought it was enough, the treatment was done.
  • The next time Dr. Farshchian saw Michael was the weekend after he was arrested.
  • Putnam: How was he doing?
  • Dr. Farshchian: Not too good
  • Putnam: Was he using drugs again?
  • Dr. Farshchian: No
  • Dr. Farshchian: There was an attempt intervention by the family but MJ was very difficult to get to, bodyguard, so it may not have happened
  • Putnam asked if the intervention was in the Spring of 2002. Dr. Farshchian said it might’ve been after or before, not sure.
  • Dr. Farshchian is not aware of MJ doing any other outpatient treatment.
  • Dr. Farshchian said when MJ’s third child, Blanket, was just born, there was ‘a monkey on his back’, he didn’t want to do it anymore.
  • Monkey on his back was Demerol use, Dr. Farshchian said.
  • Dr. Farshchian said he didn’t know why MJ became addicted or started taking Demerol. The doctor said MJ did not abuse other drugs or alcohol
  • MJ was seeing other doctors in CA.
  • List of other doctors:
  • Dr. William Van Valin — Dr. Farshchian doesn’t know him
  • Dr. Arnold Klein — yes, I heard about him through the media
  • Dr. Murray — Dr. Farshchian doesn’t know him
  • Dr. Steven Hoefflin — Dr. Farshchian doesn’t know him
  • Dr. Metzger– yes, heard being MJ’s physician in LA, might have spoken to him. Spoke about implants, what to do about it, how he should look
  • Last time Dr. Farshchian spoke with Mrs. Jackson was at the funeral. Before he spoke with her at a 2002 Christmas at Neverland.
  • He said he also had a phone call with Mrs. Jackson where she wanted to know about the implants.
  • Michael called Mrs. Jackson and Dr. Farshchian said he was treating MJ for addiction to Demerol.
  • Last time he spoke with MJ on the phone was in the Winter of 2004. His first impression was that he wanted to get better for the kids’ sake.
  • Did you understand Mrs. Jackson was concerned about his health?
  • Dr. Farshchian: Yes, I don’t recall the conversation, but once she understood the procedure he said she was happy
  • Dr. Farshchian: Once at Neverland Michael showed his mother the implant. She was very happy about it.
  • That was the end of the video deposition. Judge adjourned trial until 9:45 am PT tomorrow.

I mentioned Dr. Farshchian records because they are needed for understanding Katherine Jackson’s testimony and all those interventions attempted by the family. The fact that Katherine Jackson does not remember certain things should not be regarded as a sign of her being untruthful – she is an old woman with impaired memory and the events described took place more than 10 years ago.

As regards interventions Putnam claimed that there was one more, staged by the family in 2007, but over here he is completely wrong.

PEOPLE MAGAZINE IN 2007

The ABC tweets tell us that the People Magazine published in September 2007 had an article speaking about another intervention on the part of the Jacksons:

  • Putnam showed a letter on People Magazine (Sept. 7, 2007) the family sent about MJ not addicted to pain killers and alcohol.
  • Mrs. Jackson: We were not trying to take away the business or anything like that. That’s a lie.
  • Mrs. Jackson said she never attempted to take her son’s business. Just because it’s in the magazine tabloids doesn’t make it true, she said.
  • There are lies, these are all lies, Mrs. Jackson said. “We didn’t try to take his business away.”
  • Tito, Marlon, Jackie, Jermaine, Katherine signed this letter. Putnam asked why she signed it if it wasn’t true, she said I wanted it to stop
  • Mrs. Jackson: As far as the tabloids, I didn’t waste my time because I know all they do is to try to make money
  • Putnam: Isn’t it true your son MJ asked you to sign this?
  • Mrs. Jackson: I don’t remember my son asking me to sign this
  • Mrs. Jackson said she doesn’t’ remember MJ being involved in the draft of the letter. She doesn’t know who asked her to sign it.
  • Putnam showed Mrs. Jackson Randy’s deposition saying MJ asked her to sign the letter. She said it doesn’t refresh her recollection about it.

The story about the People’s Magazine in 2007 faintly reminded me of something I had written earlier. It was a post about Jack Wishna bringing Michael to Las Vegas from Ireland on December 23, 2006.

People Magazine, September 17, 2007

People Magazine, September 17, 2007

The first thing I found when looking it up again was the People magazine article itself.

It was published on September 17, 2007 so the Jackson’s letter in reply to that article could not be written on September 7 the same year as Putnam claims it.

The second thing I found from that magazine is that the article referred to an intervention in the year 2006 (and not 2007 as Putnam claimed). This is what it said:

According to several sources, Rwaramba is preventing some Jackson family members from seeing him—and from helping him with what many sources claim is an addiction to prescription drugs. Jermaine Jackson confirmed to PEOPLE on July 21 that he’s worried about his brother’s health.

L.A. attorney Tom Mesereau Jr., who defended Jackson at his 2005 trial, says, “I was approached by the Jackson family” to stage an intervention for Jackson last year but did not participate. A source close to the family confirms the Jacksons did attempt an intervention in Las Vegas in 2006; three of Jackson’s brothers were there and sister Janet was on the phone. “

Michael got pissed off and said he wasn’t on drugs,” says one family source. Several people interviewed also agree that because of Rwaramba most family members are “cut off—there is no communication with Michael,” says a source close to the family, who adds that Jackson’s brother Randy is afraid Michael will die just like Anna Nicole Smith.

At that time I assumed that the magazine made a big mistake by citing 2006 as the year of the ‘intervention’ and supposed that if it ever took place it could be only in 2007 – Michael arrived from Ireland on December 23, 2006, healthy, excited, invigorated, so there was absolutely no time or reason to arrange any interventions at that moment.

People Magazine spoke of an intervention in 2006. (By the way a closer look at the picture of MJ and the baby Blanket shows that the baby is sitting on the railing)

People Magazine spoke of an intervention in 2006. (Off topic: A closer look at the picture of MJ and Blanket shows that the baby is not ‘dangling’ but is probably sitting on the railing. Click to enlarge)

However now I know that formally the magazine was correct – the ‘intervention’ was indeed arranged immediately upon Michael’s arrival in Las Vegas in 2006.

There is one article I’ve overlooked previously which says that it happened exactly at Christmas time in 2006 and was actually no intervention proper but was a totally uncalled for intrusion into Michael’s life connected with his unwillingness to see his father Joe ‘more than once’.

Excerpt from the magazine

Excerpt from the magazine: 
Through his publicist Raymone Bain, Jackson denies taking drugs or being in poor health; Bain also says Jackson is fully in charge of his life. “Right now Michael is on the East Coast looking at houses and enjoying himself on vacation,” Bain told PEOPLE in July. “He’s talking on the phone every day. He is very engaged and active.” Adds the Rev. Jesse Jackson, a longtime friend and adviser: “I was with him [in July] and he was healthy, spry, effervescent. After all the pressure of the trial, it weakened him to some extent, but he bounced back.”

Michael was absolutely clean after Ireland in terms of drugs and even alcohol as his Irish friend Paddy Dunning in whose house he stayed for about 5 months said that he drank some wine only at dinner table, so Joe must have been completely mad if he assumed that Michael was on drugs when he arrived from Ireland.

Whatever ideas Joe Jackson had he called Jack Wishna, asked him to get Michael to call his mother Katherine because “it was Christmas” and she, according to Wishna “tried an intervention” and “all the kids were there for it”.  Unfortunately we cannot ask Jack Wisha as he committed suicide in November 2012, but this is the story he told to Norm Clarke:

He said family friction surfaced early after Jackson arrived in Las Vegas.

At Jackson’s Summerlin residence, his father, Joe, “would come to the gate, and Michael refused to see him more than once. Joe called me and said, ‘Get Michael to call his mother (Katherine). It’s Christmas.Katherine tried an intervention. All the kids were here for it.”

http://www.vegascommunityonline.com/2009/6/Jne09-w4-NFN_ClarkeColNorm-1313.htm

It wasn’t a drug intervention proper as there was nothing to intervene about, and all Katherine Jackson did was talking to her son and saying to him that she did not want to read in the news that he “ended up like the others”, but we can still imagine how insulting even that mild attempt was – Michael was living the cleanest living possible, and here again a crowd of people arrived suspecting him of something bad and insinuating things about him which he had stopped doing long ago.

Mrs. Jackson testimony is not much different from what Jack Wishna said about it. She said that she and her several children went to Las Vegas and she talked to Michael. A quote from her testimony:

Q.        So you had conversations with your children, and they said that they thought your son Michael Jackson  had a problem with prescription medications; correct?

A.        Yes. But they had heard it.

Q.        And as a result of their saying that to you, you had a conversation with your son Michael     Jackson about it; correct?

A.        Uhm, that was much later.

Q.        Okay.

A.        Yes.

Q.        Let me make sure I understand that.  So you had a conversation with your children where they indicated that they thought that your son had a problem with prescription medications?

A.        Uhm, I wouldn’t say, “a conversation.” I just heard.

A.        Couple of my kids brought it to me that they had heard it out there.

Q.        And I asked if, whether as a result of that, you had a conversation with your son Michael Jackson  about it.

A.        I talked to him about it, yes.

Q.        Okay. And did you have that conversation in person?

A.        Yes.

Q.        And do you remember that conversation taking place in Las Vegas?

A.        Yes.

Q.        Now, just do you remember when that happened?

A.        Not I don’t remember exactly the year or anything like that. But at that time he was living in Las Vegas.

Q.        So one thing you recall is he was living in Las Vegas at the time?

A.        Yes.

Q.        Do you remember where the where it took place? Do you remember where you were talking to your son when you had this conversation about the use of painkillers?

A.        Yes. It was I was getting ready to leave, and there’s a theater not too far from the door. And we stepped inside the theater, and that’s where I talked to him.

Q.        Let me ask a little bit about that.  When you say, “not too far from the door”

A.        Front door.

Q.        The front door of the house?

A.        Yes.

Q.        And what house was this?

A.        In Las Vegas.

Q.        Was this the Palomar house?

A.        No.

Q.        What house was it, ma’am? Do you remember where the house was?

A.        No. I don’t remember the street or anything.

Q.        Can you describe it? What was it like?

A.        Two-story house.

Q.        Uh-huh. Was it light?

A.        I don’t even remember the color.

Q.        Okay. Do you know if the children were living in the house at the time?

A.        Yes.

Q.        Do you remember approximately how old they were?

A.        No, I don’t.

Q.        Okay.  So you stepped out of the house, and there was a theater. Was the theater on the property?

A.        Yes.

Q.        So it was part of the house?

A.        Yes.

Q.        Okay.  And so you’re at the property, and you stepped into the door where the theater to the house was;  correct?

A.        Yes.

Q.        And you did this as you were getting ready to leave?

A.        Yes.

Q.        And this conversation was just between you and Mr. Jackson?

A.        Yes, it was.

Q.        And was this where you told him that you had heard that he was using prescription drugs?

A.        Yes.

Q.        And is this the only time you ever had that conversation with him?

A.        Yes.

Q.        No other time ever in his lifetime where you had that conversation?

A.        Only time.

Q.        Okay.  And is this the conversation that you mentioned on Friday where you said that you didn’t want him to end up that he would be like the others?

A.        That’s right.

Q.        What did you mean by that?

A.        I didn’t want to hear one mention that or one day that something had happened to him.

Q.        And when you told him this, that you had heard that he was using prescription drugs, he denied it, didn’t he, ma’am?

A.        Yes, he did. He didn’t yes, he denied it.

THE LETTER

People Magazine, 2007. This is how Michael Jackson looked in April 2007 - a confident and vigorous man with a jaunty step

People Magazine, 2007. This is how Michael Jackson looked in April 2007, several months after the ‘intervention’ – a confident and vigorous man with a jaunty step

That ‘intervention’ was surely another of those embarrassing situations the Jacksons got themselves into and most probably later they wished they had not given in to Joe and to the dirty tabloid gossip about Michael. This is a big reason why tabloids should never be read – they lie like crazy and people tend to be totally misguided by them.

There was absolutely nothing wrong with Michael at the time, he looked fine and was full of excitement for starting new projects in the US.

So when an article in the People Magazine appeared in September 2007 saying that the Jacksons staged an intervention in 2006 they probably thought it as their duty to make it up for Michael – there was indeed no intervention and all of it was nothing but a big embarrassment for all those involved.

So now the same crowd of people wrote a letter to the People Magazine saying that Michael wasn’t abusing anything and all of it was lies. Mrs. Jackson signed it too, and everything the letter said was sheer truth.

Putnam read out the letter to Mrs. Jackson trying to catch her lying but she indeed said only the truth – the poor mother is simply being forced now to answer for some people in her family who persuaded her to go to Las Vegas and speak to Michael in December 2006 for no reason at all.

A quote from the testimony:

Q.       Do you remember in September of 2007 there being publications that were reporting rumors of which the most troubling and heinous was that your son Michael Jackson was dependent on painkillers and alcohol?  Do you remember those publications?

A.        I had seen some.

Q.        Okay. So you had seen publications that had reported this.  And when I asked you why you talked to your son Michael Jackson, when he was living in Las Vegas, and talked about this being, perhaps, in 2006 to 2008, you’d  indicated that you had heard this information from your  children. Did you also get information from publications  that there were rumors that your son was using and  I’m sorry, dependent on painkillers and alcohol?

A.        It was out there in magazines and things. I never bought them and read them.

Q.        Okay, ma’am.

A.        And the reason I signed this paper, my children brought it to me. And some of this we weren’t trying  to intervene and take over his business and everything  like that. All these were lies.

Q.        So let’s talk about those. That’s the next  paragraph. It says: “people and other news organizations have quoted ‘sources’ indicating that our family has attempted a drug intervention and engaged in an effort to take over his business affairs because of this alleged drug and alcohol usage.” Correct?

A.        I see what you read, yes.

Q.        And is that what you’re saying, you never attempted to do that? You never attempted to take over your son’s businesses?

A.        No.

Q.        Do you think it would have been inappropriate for you to intervene if you thought your son had a drug  problem?

A.        Repeat yourself.

Q.        Sure. Please, ma’am.  I’m trying you just had a reaction to this idea of taking over your son’s businesses?

A.        No.

Q.        I’m trying that never happened; correct?

A.        No.

Q.        But you had attempted at least one intervention before, had you not?

A.        Yes.

Q.        And but what you’re saying is that what you didn’t do is that you never tried to take over his business affairs; correct?

A.        No.

Q.        And in the next paragraph, it says: “we categorically deny ever planning, participating in, or having  knowledge of any kind of intervention whatsoever. We strongly believe that these ‘sources’ and others, no matter  who they are, are making these  defamatory, inaccurate, and untrue  claims for monetary reasons.”  Do you see that, ma’am?

A.        I do.

Q.        Now, that’s not true, though; right? You can’t  categorically deny ever any planning, participating in,  or having knowledge of any kind of intervention;  correct? 

Mr. Panish:       I’m going to object, your honor.  It’s referring to the article, if you go back to the  time. 

The judge:         overruled. 

Mr. Putnam:         it doesn’t. 

Mr. Panish:       it does.

Q.      I’m sorry, ma’am.  You said “no” to that question?

A.        Just because it’s in the magazines, the tabloids, that means there’s liars in the world. Most of this letter is not true.

Q.        Most of it is not true. Some of it’s true, though; right?

A.        Plus I didn’t write this letter.

Q.        Excuse me, ma’am?

A.        They’re just talking about me, and it says my son and let me see the first paragraph.

Q.        I can show it

A.        Quite naturally, I’ll sign it because there are lies. These are all lies. Nobody planned to take over his business, or anything like that.

Q.        All right, ma’am.  Well, it’s those magazines may have published some lies, ma’am, but it wasn’t a lie that  you’d attempted an intervention before, was it, ma’am?  You had attempted an intervention, hadn’t you?

A.        Yes. At one time, I told you. My children wanted me to go along.

Q.        And you didn’t remember if your children tried at other times, had they not?

A.        I don’t know. They might have. I don’t know.

Q.        You don’t know.  Goes on to say that:  “Michael Jackson and the  Jackson family have endured years of  false accusations and misrepresentations. It’s time for the unfair and hurtful rumors for profit to end. Thank you.”  You see that, ma’am?

A.        Yes, I do.

Q.        Now, at the bottom there are a bunch of signatures; right?

A.        Yes.

Q.        One purports to be the signature of Tito Jackson; one for Marlon; one for Jackie; one for Jermaine.  And there’s yours at the bottom; correct, ma’am?

A.        Correct.

Q.        And you did sign this, didn’t you?

A.        That’s my signature.

Q.        And you said on Friday, when asked on your  direct, if you could recall signing, was asked that, you  said, “yes, I can recall signing.”  Do you recall signing this?

A.        I told you Friday I recall signing it?

Q.        Yes, ma’am.  “you know what? I don’t  really remember that thing, but I did  sign something.”  is this the “something” you’re talking about,  ma’am?

A.        Probably, yes.

Q.        And why would you sign it if it wasn’t true?

A.        I signed it because I wanted them to stop talking about things that weren’t true.

Q.        You also wanted them to stop talking about your  son?

A.        This is not a letter to sign something that is true. It’s a letter to sign something because it’s not true, and we want them to stop. But as far as the intervention, that’s the truth.

Q.        And, so, ma’am, it’s your understanding that this was done to try to get the press to stop talking about your son’s drug use; is that correct, ma’am?

A.        To stop telling a lot of lies.

Q.        And would it be a lie to say that there had been an attempted intervention of your son?

A.        No.

Q.        Because there had been; correct, ma’am?

A.        I told you, we went, and that was my first time  ever.

Q.        And is what you’re trying to tell me, ma’am, is  that you didn’t try an intervention in 2007? Is that  correct?

A.        I don’t remember. 2007?

Q.        Uh-huh.

A.        No.

Q.        And do you know if your children attempted any interventions at that time?

A.        I don’t know. I only know that I did one time.

This remarkable conversation about an intervention that never was was preceded by another sidebar where Ms. Chang confirmed that there was no intervention in 2007:

Ms. Chang: Here is the only thing that we have to  add. It’s not as drastic as you think.  The first paragraph of this indicates that  people magazine has “followed other publications in  reporting untrue and inaccurate information.”  we need that people magazine article, because  in order for this to make sense, it is a 2007 article,  and it was alleging that he was abusing it and that they  had an intervention in 2007.  So, therefore, this cannot make sense without  the people magazine article. It’s partial; it’s taken  out of context. And this appeared in people magazine‘s  editorial section. And she was questioned about it in  her deposition without the original people magazine.  She didn’t recall what it was referring she said her  publicist had her sign it.  But, in essence, it is true with respect to, there was no intervention that the family asked for in 2007.

As regards September 2007 or exactly the period when both the article and letter were published in the People magazine, Michael was staying at Frank Cascio’s house (August 19th – October 31st, 2007) and Frank who had seen Michael take some medication before noted that  there was absolutely no sign of Michael taking any sort of medicine:

We threw a surprise party for my mother’s fiftieth birthday in New Jersey on August 19, 2007. Later that evening, when the guests had gone, Michael appeared at the house. He had his three kids in tow, as well as his black Lab, Kenya, and a cat. My father called me in the city and said, “I think you should come home tonight, but make sure you come alone.” As soon as he said that, I knew Michael was at the house. … I was working in Manhattan, but I was back and forth to New Jersey frequently to see Michael and the kids. We celebrated Michael’s forty-ninth birthday, which fell ten days after my mother’s fiftieth, with a big family dinner. My mother cooked, and we also ordered in some pizza because Michael loved pizza. The time he’d spent in Bahrain after the trial had been a good break for him. He had needed time away, time for himself, and he seemed rejuvenated. He was alive and excited, getting back into being creative and free. He and Eddie were working in the studio during the day, and he was playing with an idea for an animated cartoon he hoped to produce. He was happy to be around my family, with whom he could be himself. There was no sign that he was on any sort of medicine. He was back to being Michael. (My Friend Michael, chapter 23)

AEG WATCHED HIM WASTE AWAY

The rest of Katherine Jackson’s testimony was about AEG. It was very well summed by Brian Panish:

  • “They knew he was having a problem,” Panish said. “He needed them for this concert. They could have easily told him, ‘Look, until you go see the appropriate doctor and come back, we’re not going on with the rehearsal.’ They’re the only ones that really had the ability to do something about it and they chose not to.”

This is absolutely true. AEG knew perfectly well that Michael’s health was deteriorating in front of their eyes but they chose to totally ignore it and didn’t allow others to offer him any help. And judging by the fact that they blocked Joe Jackson from coming to Michael’s home they prevented the relatives from helping Michael either though he was already on the brink of a catastrophe due to his total lack of biological sleep.

Katherine Jackson said that they watched him waste away and even waited for it, and I am inclined to agree with her.

And no matter what situation with Joe was like before, once Michael asked for him there should have been no force on the planet to block Joe from coming and seeing his son. It was absolutely none of AEG’s business to decide who was to see Michael and who was not.  Even though I am no fan of Joe Jackson if he had been there he could have at least brought a proper doctor to Michael and Michael would be alive now.

The ABC tweets conclude:

  • Mrs. Jackson: I had heard that, that Elizabeth Taylor had something to do about drugs but I don’t watch television that much.
  • Putnam: Were you aware your son MJ had gone to rehab before?
  • Mrs. Jackson said she did not discuss with MJ about it and had never heard MJ’s 1993 announcement he was going into rehab.
  • Mrs. Jackson: My children probably didn’t want me to know about it.
  • MJ’s mother said she never heard before tour had been canceled because of MJ’s rehab. She said it doesn’t mean it wasn’t but she didn’t know
  • Putnam asked about whether she shut her ears to bad things. “I may have said that but I don’t remember,” Mrs. Jackson responded.
  • Mrs. Jackson: I don’t like hearing bad news.
  • Mrs. Jackson wore black and white print long jacket with fuchsia flowers, with cranberry top and skirt.
  • Putnam asked about the attempted intervention in 2002. He asked about Dr. Farshchian treating MJ’s addiction to Demerol.
  • Mrs. Jackson said he doesn’t recall Dr. Farshchian and does not recall any phone call with any doctor about MJ’s addiction to Demerol.
  • Putnam showed Mrs. Jackson transcript of Dr. Farshchian’s deposition and asked if that refreshed her recollection. She said it doesn’t.
  • Putnam asked if  Dr. Farshchian testified he spoke with her because she wanted to know all the details of her son’s Demerol use.
  • I don’t remember who Dr. Farshchian is and I don’t remember treating Michael for Demerol, Mrs. Jackson said.
  • Putnam: Do you remember testimony about MJ having an implant to treat Demerol?
  • Mrs. Jackson: I don’t know anything about that
  • Mrs. Jackson said she doesn’t remember discussing the implant in 2002.
  • As to Louis Farrakhan — she met him, but doesn’t remember seeing him at Neverland.
  • Mrs. Jackson said she does not remember MJ showing her a Narcan patch.
  • Putnam asked if Mrs Jackson knows there were a number of doctors who testified in this case. She said she didn’t know, didn’t see deposition
  • Putnam asked if she recalls sitting down for interview with Oprah Winfrey in the fall of 2010. Mrs. Jackson said yes.
  • Oprah’s interview aired about a month after the the lawsuit was filed. She watched it when it aired at the Hayvenhurst house.
  • Putnam: Did you try to tell the truth in that interview?
  • Mrs. Jackson: Yes
  • Putnam: You said you believed your son was addicted to drugs?
  • Mrs. Jackson: I told Oprah that
  • Mrs. Jackson: I told you MJ was on painkillers, but I don’t think he was abusing it.
  • In Oprah’s interview, Mrs. Jackson said it was a long time before she knew MJ was addicted to painkillers.
  • She also said about the family’s attempted intervention: the children told her to take MJ to rehab and kind of clean him up.
  • Mrs. Jackson told Oprah she didn’t want to hear MJ had overdosed. MJ kept saying he wasn’t on it, and that his own mother didn’t believe him
  • Mrs. Jackson: I kind of believe it and didn’t believe it, hearing from my children, hearing from other people.
  • Mrs. Jackson conceded she denied this morning that her son was abusing drugs.
  • I didn’t know what to believe, Mrs. Jackson said.
  • Putnam: Do you think your son was abusing painkillers?
  • Mrs. Jackson: I don’t know
  • I didn’t know what to believe, she said. “I went to Neverland because my children kept asking me and I was concerned.”
  • Putnam: Was there a time you were concerned with MJ using painkillers?
  • Mrs. Jackson: I can’t say I weren’t concerned
  • Putnam: Was there any time during the criminal trial that you were concerned MJ was under the influence of something?
  • Mrs. Jackson: No
  • Mrs. Jackson said she never discussed with her son’s attorneys or managers about her concerns.
  • Mrs. Jackson said she had many conversations with Frank DiLeo and they were all friendly.
  • She remembers answering the phone when Frank DiLeo went back to work for Michael.
  • Mrs. Jackson wanted to know why people kept re-hiring people Michael had fired.
  • Putnam asked if it was someone other than MJ who hired DiLeo. “I think so, Michael didn’t want him back,” she said.
  • Mrs. Jackson: Michael and DiLeo told me he was back for the This Is It tour.
  • Putnam: Did you tell Mr. DiLeo you were concerned that your son was abusing painkillers?
  • Mrs. Jackson: No, since he had just come back
  • Mrs. Jackson said she never told AEG Live or Randy Phillips about MJ having drug problem.
  • Mrs. Jackson testified she was receiving money from MJ and also from Janet Jackson.
  • At first, it was not on a monthly basis, but it became that way, Mrs. Jackson explained. Janet sent her $10,000 a month.
  • Mrs. Jackson said she was receiving that amount when MJ died. The money went to her assistant Janice at the office.
  • Mrs. Jackson said she told Janet she didn’t have to continue to send her money after MJ died.
  • In re-direct, Panish asked if before MJ died, was he paying for everything?
  • Mrs. Jackson: Yes, paying for everything
  • Panish: Did you rely on him (MJ) for all necessities of life?
  • Mrs. Jackson: Yes
  • Panish inquired if Putnam asked during deposition personal question?
  • Mrs. Jackson: Yes, he asked ‘did your husband beat you’?
  • P: Were you upset?
  • Mrs. J: Yes
  • Panish: Farrakhan and Nation of Islam, does that have anything to do with your son’s death?
  • Mrs. Jackson: No
  • Mrs Jackson said she doesn’t know anything about computers, it’s not a lawyer or investigator. Her highest level of education is high school
  • Panish asked what she did to go about this case. “I hired your firm,” Mrs. Jackson said.
  • Why, Panish asked. “I wanted to find out what really happened to my son,” Mrs. Jackson responded.
  • Phillips and Gongaware never called/send card to Mrs. Jackson after MJ died, Mrs Jackson said. Kenny Ortega went to see her, she said.
  • Panish: Did you know your son was sleep-deprived for 60 days?
  • Mrs. Jackson: No, I didn’t
  • Panish asked if she knew Hougdahl wrote an email to AEG that MJ was deteriorating in front of his eyes?
  • Mrs. Jackson: No
  • Mrs. Jackson said she learned about MJ’s condition in court, that AEG never told her MJ was deteriorating, paranoia, losing weight, rambling
  • The could’ve called me, he was asking for his father, he was scared, he was asking for Joseph, Mrs. Jackson said, crying.
  • Panish: Did AEG ever tell you they called your son a freak?
  • Mrs. Jackson: No
  • P: And that it was creepy meeting your son?
  • Mrs. J: No (crying)
  • Mrs. Jackson: They were there, without calling somebody. My husband and I would have been there in a second (crying)
  • They watched him waste away and waited, I know they did it, Mrs. Jackson said, crying.
  • Panish showed picture of MJ in June 09 and asked if she ever saw her son like that. “Never,” said Mrs. Jackson crying, wiping her eyes.
  • Panish: Issue of restitution was the state decision and you told them not to do it, correct?
  • Mrs. Jackson: Yes
  • Panish asked if the figure for restitution was set by the state. Mrs. Jackson said yes.
  • In re-cross, Putnam showed a video where Mrs. Jackson said “It could’ve been prevented, he hired a doctor to take care of him.”
  • Putnam asked if Mrs. Jackson talked to her grandchildren about Dr. Murray in search of the truth.
  • I could, but I didn’t want to bring that up with them, Mrs. Jackson answered.
  • Putnam asked if Mrs. Jackson spoke with Sister Rose, the kids’ nanny.
  • She told me that MJ was very weak, and she told me that she talked about what went down at the practice, they had to hold him up she said
  • Mrs. Jackson doesn’t know why Sister Rose is called sister and Brother Michael is brother.
  • Putnam: Did I say anything improper in the deposition regarding the Nation of Islam?
  • Mrs. Jackson: You were asking me question about it
  • Putnam asked if Mrs. Jackson knows Gongaware. “No, but that shouldn’t have stopped him, to say I’m sorry what happened to your son” she said
  • Putnam asked if AEG put together a Memorial Service for MJ. She said yes.
  • Mrs. Jackson said AEG told her if she did the memorial service at the Staples Center it would be free (she wanted to do it at the Coliseum)
  • In re-re-direct, Panish asked: They still didn’t send a card, did they?
  • Mrs. Jackson: No. Thousands and thousands of people sent her card.
  • She’s a Jehovah’s Witness and there’s a difference between her religion and the Nation of Islam.
  • Regarding the interview, Mrs. Jackson said she just assumed, she didn’t know whether MJ had hired Dr. Murray.
  • Panish: Did Sister Rose discuss with you about AEG pressuring MJ?
  • Mrs. Jackson: Yes
  • Panish showed video of Phillips saying they hired him.
  • Panish: There was a suggestion in this trial you hired Kai Chase back so she can testify in your favor?
  • Panish: Did you hire Kai Chase so she would testify in your favor?
  • Mrs. Jackson: No, not at all. The children knew her, they wanted her, that’s why.
  • Mrs. Jackson: Kai Chase has been working for me not quite a year yet
  • In re-re-cross, Putnam inquired Phillips said ‘we hired him’ and Mrs. Jackson said ‘Michael’ hired him.
  • Mrs. Jackson: Like I said, I didn’t know who hired him at that time.
  • Putnam said one of them was not right in their interview. Mrs. Jackson answered: “I’m not correct.”
  • In re-re-re-direct, Panish asked: Who do you think it’s in a better position to know who hired the doctor, you or the CEO of AEG?
  • Mrs. Jackson: The CEO of AEG
  • Mrs. Jackson was then excused. She went home for the rest of the day to rest.
  • Judge told jury we are now moving to defendants’ case, even though plaintiffs have not yet rested their case in chief.

ALAN DUKE’S article:

AEG Live tries to show Michael Jackson had secret drug addiction

Los Angeles (CNN) — Michael Jackson “had a real monkey on his back” with a longtime drug addiction, his family kept it secret from the world and it led to his overdose death, a lawyer for AEG Live said. The concert promoter’s defense against the Jackson family’s wrongful death lawsuit began Tuesday and will include testimony from “all of the many, many doctors” who treated Jackson over the past decades, AEG Live attorney Marvin Putnam said.

AEG Live executive John Meglin, who is the CEO of the Concerts West division, returns to the stand Wednesday after testifying Tuesday that Dr. Conrad Murray’s request for $5 million to work as Jackson’s personal physician was a topic at a meeting of the company’s executive committee. Jackson lawyer Brian Panish said that was an important revelation that would help his case.

Panish pressed Meglin on the question of if he agreed with his boss, AEG Live President Randy Phillips, who testified that he thought Jackson was the greatest artist of all time. “I think that Michael’s very big in the pop world, but the Rolling Stones are bigger, or Led Zeppelin,” Megline said. “I’m a rocker.”

Defense witnesses will also include a parade of Jackson family members, including a return appearance by matriarch Katherine Jackson, who just concluded two days of testimony as her lawyers presented their case. “They kept his private world private as best they could and now they would like to blame somebody else for things that only they knew privately,” Putnam said.

Michael Jackson’s mother and three children contend AEG Live, which was producing and promoting his comeback concerts, is liable in his death because it negligently hired, retained or supervised Murray.

Murray was convicted of involuntary manslaughter in Jackson’s death, which the coroner ruled was caused by an overdose of the surgical anesthetic propofol. The doctor told investigators he was using the drug to treat Jackson’s insomnia as he prepared for his “This Is It” debut in London.

Jackson, not AEG Live, chose and controlled Murray, Putnam argued. He said in his opening statements at the start of the trial 12 weeks ago he would show jurors “ugly stuff” about Jackson to prove that AEG Live executives had no way of knowing about the dangerous treatments the doctor was giving in the privacy of Jackson’s bedroom.

Michael’s mom speaks

The appearance of Katherine Jackson, Michael Jackson’s 83-year-old mother, as a concluding witness in her case gave Putnam a chance to probe what family members knew about Jackson’s drug abuse history. “There are a lot of enormous inconsistencies in what is being said and what the truth is,” Putnam told reporters Monday after he finished his cross-examination of Katherine Jackson.

She “reported to the world and to the press that he never had a problem with prescription drugs,” that he never entered drug rehab and that the family never attempted an intervention to stop his drug use, he said. “As we now know, Michael Jackson had a longtime problem with prescription drugs, so what had been told to the world during his lifetime wasn’t true.”

The Jackson family’s lawyer, Brian Panish, said AEG Live executives were “in the best position to help Michael Jackson” when they saw his health deteriorating in the last two months of his life.

Show director Kenny Ortega sent a series of e-mails to top AEG Live executives warning them that Jackson showed “strong signs of paranoia, anxiety and obsessive-like behavior” at a rehearsal. “I think the very best thing we can do is get a top psychiatrist in to evaluate him ASAP,” Ortega wrote. “It’s like there are two people there. One (deep inside) trying to hold on to what he was and still can be and not waiting us to quit him, the other in this weakened and troubled state.”

Production manager John “Bugzee” Houghdahl sent an e-mail to producers saying he “watched him deteriorate in front of my eyes over the last 8 weeks. He was able to do multiple 360 spins back in April. He’d fall on his ass if he tried now.”

“They knew he was having a problem,” Panish said. “He needed them for this concert. They could have easily told him, ‘Look, until you go see the appropriate doctor and come back, we’re not going on with the rehearsal.’ They’re the only ones that really had the ability to do something about it and they chose not to.”

Ortega testified this month that he thought AEG Live should have halted production on the show until Jackson was well.

Despite the e-mail evidence and testimony, Putnam insisted Monday that AEG Live executives knew nothing about Jackson’s failing health. “They had little interaction with Michael Jackson in terms of the production and promotion of that,” Putnam said, adding that the executives “certainly” did not know “that he was having any problems.”

But Panish said the executives should have known: “He was deteriorating in front of their own eyes.” “They watched him waste away,” Katherine Jackson testified.

Jackson testified in her first day on the stand Friday that she filed the lawsuit “because I want to know what really happened to my son.”

During cross-examination, the AEG Live lawyer played a clip from an interview she gave to NBC a year after her son’s death in which she said Michael Jackson had hired the doctor. In response, her lawyer argued she made the statement before seeing AEG e-mails indicating that the company hired him.

Putnam questioned her about a statement she and several of her children signed in 2007 accusing People Magazine of publishing “untrue and inaccurate information” about Michael Jackson’s drug use.

“We categorically deny ever planning, participating in, or having knowledge of any kind of intervention, whatsoever,” the statement read. Katherine Jackson acknowledged, however, that she participated in an attempted intervention with her son at his Neverland Ranch in 2002.

“I wanted them to stop lying,” she testified, referring to the magazine. “I was worried about all the lies they were telling about the family.” “Was it a lie to say your son had a problem with prescription drugs?” Putnam asked. “He did not have a problem,” she insisted.

Putnam later asked Jackson’s mother if she liked to “shut your ears to bad things.” “I don’t like to hear bad news,” she said.

Jackson appeared combative at times when Putnam cross-examined her, punching back at his questions. “What does this have to do with my son dying?” she replied at one point.

“I think she was badgered, but that wasn’t the first time,” Panish told reporters later. “In her deposition, she was asked questions like, “Does your husband ever beat you?’”

For the pretrial deposition, she was questioned for about 12 hours over three days. Putnam denied he was being overly aggressive in his questioning of her. “I just wanted to know the facts from her and there was no reason to be aggressive with her,” he said.

“She was combative, but you can’t blame Mrs. Jackson for that. None of us want to find ourselves in a situation where we’re having to confront the very public death of our child.”

Putnam refused to discuss why he asked Katherine Jackson in the deposition if her husband, Joe Jackson, ever beat her. “What occurred in those depositions was confidential at Mrs. Jackson’s request, therefore I am not at liberty to go into to the private matters that we went into in that deposition,” Putnam told CNN.

However, Katherine Jackson and her lawyer both brought up the question in court Monday. “I am not going to go into what we went into about the very tragic history Michael Jackson had with his parents and father over the period of his life,” Putnam said.

“That is something we did not go into on the stand because it is not relevant. I’m not bringing that up.” Testimony is expected to last into September, the judge told the jury. http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/24/showbiz/jackson-death-trial/index.html

The media now says that Dr. Farshchian’s testimony appears to contradict Katherine’s words about “no knowledge of Michael’s addiction”. Firstly I don’t see how it helps the AEG case (they considered Michael an addict themselves) and secondly, I disagree with the above idea in principle.

There is a very fine line to be drawn between addiction and Michael’s need to take prescription medication for legitimate medical conditions (of which he had many – a burn and injury to his back, for example), so what Mrs. Jackson testified to was her big confusion in matters whether the medications were indeed necessary or not, and if necessary, to what degree. She knew of Michael taking medication but she could not know at which point the abuse was starting and whether it had started at all.

She said that she knew he was taking painkillers but she did not know whether he was abusing them.

Can taking medication be considered abuse if Michael was indeed in constant pain from all his innumerable ailments? Who could tell that except a very qualified doctor? So how could Mrs. Jackson definitely know where was a legitimate reason for taking a painkiller and where was the addiction?

Actually the fact that Michael was seeking treatment and went for those implants spoke to his responsible attitude to whatever problems he had and his great determination to fight them. This isn’t the behavior of an addict, but this is the behavior of a responsible person who realizes that things are getting out of control and need correction.

Knowing that Michael was controlling the problem could only convince his mother that her boy was on the right road and there was no addiction. Yes, she knew that her son was taking medication, so what of it? She also knew that they were connected with his tremendous health issues…

And how can all this talk about Katherine help AEG anyway, I wonder?

Katherine Jackson knew about son’s drug issues, doctor says -exclusive

Wednesday, July 24, 2013

LOS ANGELES (KABC) – There’s a major development in the Michael Jackson wrongful death trial regarding the singer’s use of drugs. Newly revealed testimony appears to contradict the recent testimony of Jackson’s mother, who claimed to have no knowledge of her son’s past addiction.

Jurors heard the most explicit details yet of Jackson’s treatment for addiction. It was 2002, seven years before Jackson’s death from the anesthetic propofol. Jackson’s youngest son had just been born. Dr. Alimorad Farschian said Jackson wanted off of the painkiller demerol.

“Blanket was just born and that was why he wanted to, what he phrased, ‘a monkey on his back,’ he wanted to just not deal with it anymore,” Farschian said in a video deposition.

In the video, Farschian states Jackson’s family was pressuring the artist. The doctor’s statement conflicts with the testimony of Katherine Jackson, who said under oath that she had no personal knowledge that her son struggled with dependency. The doctor said he talked to her directly about the singer’s detox treatment.

“I think she wanted to know all about it, what was going on,” said Farschian.

Farschian described implanting Michael Jackson with a type of demoral antidote. Naltrexone, also known as narcane, is a tiny tube inserted under the skin to block the euphoric effect of opiates. The doctor said he implanted Jackson five times over nine months and that he personally witnessed Mrs. Jackson examining her son’s incision.

“I remember that was in Neverland. Michael did show the implant to his mother. Just his mother was there. She was very happy,” said Farschian.

Katherine Jackson is suing AEG Live, alleging that the tour promoters hired and failed to supervise Conrad Murray, the physician linked to the singer’s propofol overdose. Her attorneys assert that Jackson’s health was deteriorating from anxiety and sleep deprivation in the two months before his death.

Jurors heard from Farschian that Jackson suffered from insomnia years earlier. The doctor’s theory is that it was linked to cosmetic surgery: a key part of Jacksons nose was missing.

“It is possible that you produce what they call empty nose syndrome and producing insomnia,” said Farschian.

About the plaintiffs claim that Jackson was emaciated, the autopsy recorded he was 136 pounds when he died. Farschian testified that Jackson weighed 128 when he treated him.

http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=news/entertainment&id=9184234

Dr. Farshchian’s video deposition is here:

http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/video?id=9184248&pid=9184234

And here is the full testimony of Katherine Jackson provided by TeamMichaelJackson:


Filed under: AEG THE HORRIBLE, Jacksons vs. AEG Tagged: AEG, Dr. Farshchian, Katherine Jackson, Michael Jackson

Jacksons – AEG trial DAYS 53-55. MEGLEN’S LIES AND HIS JAPANESE FIASCO

$
0
0
John Meglen, CEO of Concerts West, a division of AEG Live

John Meglen, CEO of Concerts West, a division of AEG Live

On week 13 of the AEG trial the AEG witnesses played a cheap comedy around the business side of the matter. The AEG witnesses were John Meglen, the Co-CEO of Concerts West, a division of AEG live and Eric Briggs, a business expert retained by AEG to assess the projections of plaintiffs’ Arthur Erk.

WHAT $800 PER HOUR CAN DO

You remember that Arthur Erk estimated Michael Jackson’s potential earnings at around $1,5 billion for the next 15 years if Michael had lived.

Eric Briggs disagreed in a video deposition played on July 26 Day 57 of the trial. The deposition was short and non-committal. Despite personally working for 350 hours on the case and being assisted with 500-600 hours from his firm he didn’t assess any of Erk’s figures at all - he simply said that Michael Jackson didn’t agree to more than 50 shows and his life expectancy as of June 2009 was short.

Well, you don’t have to charge $800 per hour and work for almost a thousand hours on the case to be able to say that Michael did not agree even to 50 shows (his maximum was 10 shows) but his agreement or disagreement never mattered to the AEG people.

And you don’t have to be a wizard either to know that his life expectancy was extremely short while he was in the hands of AEG – in fact it was so short that it simply ended then and there.

However if Michael had not entered into cooperation with this company he could have lived a long and happy life and could have earned millions even without the need to sing and dance – by a mere attending VIP parties in his honor, meeting fans, dancing and singing an occasional song or two, and presenting other artists. Actually by simply enjoying himself.

I am absolutely sure of it because in the past several days I found rare videos of Michael Jackson attending a VIP and fan parties in Japan in 2007 –  two years before Michael died. Not only did Michael look absolutely smashing at those parties but he also collected $200,000 from one party alone which is equivalent to half of his net income for one AEG concert (I gather that the second party brought the same sum). In repayment for those generous fees Michael had to do nothing but just be photographed with his fans and make a short speech.

Japan 2007 VIP party

Japan 2007 VIP party

When you see the way Michael looked in 2007 there can be no doubt whatsoever that he could have lived a long and happy life. He was healthier and much more vigorous than any other man of his 48 year age at that time, and the video also showed that he had a multitude of opportunities open to him.

So when you read the summary of Eric Briggs’s deposition just look at it as a personal opinion of an expert who got $800 per hour for the 350 hours spent on the case ($280,000) as well as his firm that charged $300-800 per hour for another 500-600 hours (another $303,000) and he had to say at least something to deserve the money paid.

His video deposition played on Friday July 26, DAY 57. The ABC tweets report:

  • He was asked to assess the projections of Arthur Erk, plaintiffs’ retained expert.
  • Briggs is a senior management director at FTI Consulting and professor at USC MarshallSchool of
  • Business.
  • Briggs said he helps a media company put together forecast and assess risks of projects.
  • Entertainment and media projects: looked at films, music, touring, video games, live events, pretty much everything.
  • Briggs said he gets hired by film producers, production companies, record labels, banks and private equity that invest money.
  • He has done work for talent agencies as well, like Creative Artist and William Morris.
  • Other clients: Estate of Elvis Presley, John Wayne, Frank Sinatra, Bob Hope, among others.
  • Briggs has worked in over 1100 engagements, 300 of those related to the music industry, like Rod Stewart, Bruno Mars, 50 Cent, Usher.
  • Briggs has also worked in endorsement deals.
  • Strong: How many film engagements have you had over the course of your career? Briggs: Probably 600
  • Briggs said some of his predictions have been inaccurate. “I don’t have a crystal ball,” he said.
  • He has been doing forecast in the entertainment business for 15 years.
  • Briggs studies Economy at BrownUniversity and received his MBA at AndersonSchool at UCLA.
  • FTI Consulting has about 4,000 employees worldwide. Briggs is charging $800 an hour. He has spent approximately 350 hours.
  • Briggs has a team working on this matter, roughly 500-600 hours. Personnel on the team charge between $300-$800 per hour.
  • He has testified once in an England tax matter, equivalent to our IRS, and on an arbitration case.
  • Briggs mostly worked for companies that actively spend money in films.
  • Briggs said he has had significant involvement in most of the 1100 cases he worked on. “I’m not taking credit for somebody else.”
  • Strong showed exhibit with Erk’s Opinions: – Tour – Merchandise – Endorsement/Sponsorship – Las Vegas show – Movies
  • Briggs said he analyzed the first four opinions by Erk, since Erk didn’t project earnings for movies.
  • Briggs overarching opinion on topics: 1- It’s speculative whether these projects would occurred 2- The numbers projected are speculative
  • Briggs did not analyze Mr. Erk’s consumption numbers.
  • Japan 2007. MJ listens to fans screaming

    Japan 2007. MJ pauses when the fans are screaming

    “My understanding is that damages cannot be speculative and I didn’t want to prepare a speculative,” Briggs said.

  • MJ had a prolific career which resulted in a catalogue that results in a lot of money every year. Briggs did not analyze that.
  • He said he looked at income MJ would’ve generated for performing, going on tour.
  • “My opinion relates to opinion MJ would have generated by working,” Briggs said.
  • Strong showed an exhibit with “Erk’s TII Tour: Speculative” – No agreement beyond 50 shows – MJ’s drug use
  • Exhibit: – MJ’s history of cancellations – World tour depends on completion of 50 shows – Performance Risk – Execution Risk
  • “As of the date of death, there was no agreement that AEG or MJ would go beyond 50 shows,” Briggs said
  • Briggs: MJ had a significant history of drug use, and this was significant to render my opinion.
  • “There’s significant testimony on the record from four medical doctors in this case regarding MJ’s drug use,” Briggs explained.
  • Briggs: As part of my job, I’m asked to analyze all sorts of things, including drug use for someone who needs to perform.
  • “It’s all about the same thing: the risks,” Briggs said.
  • “My conclusion, based on the evidence presented, MJ’s life expectancy was very short as of June 2009,” Briggs said.
  •  “MJ was taking drugs in very dangerous ways, had history of taking drugs that had a long lasting impact on his health,” he opined.
  • Briggs: MJ had a unique history of great performance but cancellations, particularly in cases where they were practically certain to happen.
  • The expert said MJ canceled a number of dates on Dangerous tour to enter rehab, canceled HBO special in 1995.
  • Also, the Millennium concert didn’t take place, theTwoSeas arrangement where nothing came of it.
  • “The world tour depends on the completion of the 50 tours,” Briggs said.

    Fan Appreciation party March 2007

    Fan Appreciation party March 2007

  • “There’s always a risk of whether the audience will perform and whether the artist will show up,” Briggs testified.
  • He said Guns N Roses, U2, Lady Gaga, Van Halen — all cancelled shows that were pretty certain to happen.
  • Those aspects helped shape Briggs opinion that Erk’s projections were speculative.
  • “The four additional tours are also entirely speculative,” Briggs said. They were based on Erk’s personal opinion.
  • Briggs: MJ had agreed to do 50 shows when he died and was actively engaged in rehearsals.
  • Strong: Do you have an opinion on whether MJ would have completed the 50 shows at the O2?
  • “My opinion is that it’s speculative whether the 50 shows would have been completed,” Briggs said.
  • “There was a significant heath risk in place and the length of the tour exceeded 9 months,” Briggs explained.
  • Judge then adjourned trial until Monday at 10 am PT. We only had half a day today and will only have half day on Monday as well with Briggs.
  • Potential witnesses for next week: Debbie Rowe, video deposition of Randy Jackson and Rebbie Jackson.
  • We hope to see you then!

If this is all Eric Briggs has to say let us congratulate him on the $600,000 collected for the hard job done and proceed to John Meglen instead.

MEGLEN’S FUKUOKA FIASCO

With John Meglen of Concerts West we have another surprise. He gave an extremely boring and false testimony on Monday-Wednesday the same week and was summoned to provide his “personal knowledge of the matter”. His personal knowledge boiled down to belittling Michael Jackson, and in doing so he overdid it so much that he made himself look totally ridiculous.

He said that Led Zeppelin were bigger than Michael Jackson and that he and Marcel Avram “sold half the house” on two Michael Jackson’s History shows in 1996 in Japan and … wait a minute, is he talking about Japan?

Japanese fans in 2007. So many young faces!

Japanese fans in 2007. So many young faces!

After seeing the way Japanese fans greeted Michael in 2007 I don’t know what Meglen had to do not to be able to fill the house in Fukuoka during Michael’s 1996 History tour there. He must have either completely neglected his duties as a promoter or must have been totally unprofessional in what he was doing.

Japanese fans pay $3,400 to see Michael Jackson (March, 2007)

Japanese fans pay $3,400 for the honor to see Michael Jackson (March, 2007)

In 2007 Michael did not even have to perform but the Japanese fans still paid $3,400 a ticket just for a mere chance to have a handshake and spend a couple of seconds with him.

It was a real chase starting for many of them at MJ’s hotel, then turning into a long procession of taxis following Michael around the city and finally getting to see him at the destination point where the VIP party was held.

The 2007 documentary is even called “Fan-deMonium. Chasing Michael Jackson” and I suggest you see it before you read Meglen’s nonsense. One of the opening episodes is in Japanese, but if you survive it at approx. 3:15 the English language will start and make it a great watch.

Let me express my admiration to Japanese fans for the fantastic welcome they gave to Michael Jackson and their never-ending love for him – they really managed to give Michael what he truly deserved. So here it is – Chasing Michael Jackson and a VIP party in Japan in March 2007:

After seeing it you will realize that the “half-house” episode at Fukuoka in 1996 was totally Meglen’s fiasco and no one else’s. But he and AEG’s attorney Jessica Stebbins grasped at this straw and discussed it at great length trying to hypnotize the jury into thinking that Michael Jackson was not as big a superstar as he really was.

The ABC tweets report on July 22, DAY 53:

  • AEG called their next witness, John Meglen.
  • AEG’s attorney Jessica Stebbins Bina did direct examination.
  • John Meglen is a concert promoter, works at AEG Live, he’s the president and CEO of Concerts West.
  • Paul Gongaware is co-CEO of Concerts West with Meglen. He described his extensive background in the business.
  • Meglen said he went to Veterinarian school initially. “I feel like I work with animals some times,” he joked.
  • Bina talked about rivalry between AEG Live and Live Nation.
  • Meglen said he doesn’t think being the number 1 is necessarily a good thing. He explained it is the difference between quality and quantity.
  • When they created Concerts West, Meglen said their first tour was Andrea Bocelli. They promoted first tour of Mariah Carey.
  • Meglen worked with MJ prior to “This Is It” once. He was a consultant to a firm in Japan that promoted two MJ shows in 1996 around Christmas
  • Meglen watched both shows and said it was great. Marcel Avram was the promoter.
  • They both sold half house, he said, which is half of the tickets available. Meglen said they hid he empty seats so it wouldn’t show.
  • Bina asked if Wikipedia was wrong in saying the shows were sold out. “I don’t use Wikipedia as source for my business,” Meglen said.

Quote from the transcript:

History tour 1996, Australia

History tour 1996, Australia. The sea of fans mirrored in his sun-glasses

Q. Before “This Is It”, have you ever worked with Michael Jackson?

A. Once, yes.

Q. In what capacity?

A. As a consultant to a firm in Japan who wished to promote Michael Jackson in Fukuoka, Japan.

.. Q. How many shows did you promote for Mr. Jackson there?

A.Two shows.

Q. What did you do for the shows in Fukuoka?

A. Well, we were not financially at risk. We were hired by a Japanese firm who really had no experience on how to put a concert on, so we were hired and paid a fee to help them contract the show for Michael, and to execute the show, to promote it.

..Q. And were you involved in promoting any other portion of Mr. Jackson’s “History” tour?

A.No, I was not.

Q. So even the other Japanese legs, those were somebody else?

A. Yes.

Q. Now, turning to the Fukuoka shows themselves, did you watch the shows?

A. Yes, I went – I watched both shows?

Q. How were they?

A. They were great.

Q. Now, I read on Wikipedia that the two shows at the Fukuoka dome were sell-outs.

A. That’s far from true.

Q. I was going to ask, is that right?

A. They each sold about half the house.

Q. Half a house. Does that mean after –- half the seats that were for sale, or —

A. Yes.

..Q. Could you see whether or not the houses were full?

A. We curtained off a lot of the empty seats.

Naturally I checked up all sources available to me and found only the information confirming Wiki’s numbers and saying that both concerts at Fukuoka Dome were sold out:

The King of Pop Michael Jackson performed at the stadium four times at his solo career; The first two times, Jackson performed two sold-out concerts during his Dangerous World Tour, in September 10 & 11, 1993, for a total audience of 70,000 fans (35,000 per show); The second and last two times was in 1996, during his subsequent tour, HIStory World Tour, in December 26 and 28, on also two sold-out concerts for 80,000 people (40,000 fans per show);

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukuoka_Dome

But since Meglen says he knows better I had to look up the shows before and after Fukuoka to be able to see how successful the History tour was at all.

 January 2, 1996 Honolulu, Hawaii

January 2, 1996 Honolulu, Hawaii

The information found was smashing – three concerts in Tokyo were fully sold out (fortunately they were not promoted by Meglen), and Japan was preceded and followed by Australia and Hawaii.

In both countries the tickets were sold out within hours of beginning the sales – in Australia twice in October and December, so that they had to add three more shows, and in Hawaii also twice – in November 1996 and January 1997. Hawaii is a US territory and the media said that this was the first time its stadium was filled to its full capacity:

Oct. 5, ’96 – Concert tickets sold-out in record time in Australia. Initially, first shows scheduled for Sydney and Melbourne both sold out in under 2 hours, selling over 130,000 tickets combined. Then another record was set: Over 175,000 tickets sold out in just 8 ours. ALL 6 scheduled concerts in Australia are sold out, leaving the possibility for added dates. 3 more concerts were later added to meet the demand. As a direct result of the concerts. HIStory album shot up again on the Australian charts to the #1 spot.

Nov. 16, ’96All 35,000 tickets for Michael Jackson’s Hawaiian Jan. 3, 1997 concert sold out in just 4 hours. A second concert was tentatively scheduled, also immediately selling out. As the ticket outlets opened at 8am, an estimated 20,000 people stood in lines that snaked up and down at Aloha Stadium. Police said only two special duty officers were hired to handle the Aloha Stadium lines — but about 15 officers who worked the previous midnight watch put in overtime during the morning to control the crowds. The scene at the Aloha Soccer Stadium turned into a total chaos, as fans jumped over chain-link fences, overwhelming ticket-sellers. Jim Fulton, an official with promoter Tom Moffatt Productions, said “I have never, ever seen anything like this in Hawaii before. Ever.” 

Dec. 6, ’96 – during his Australian leg of the HIStory tour, Michael performed 9 sold out concerts in 5 different cities - Sydney, Brisbane, Melbourne, Adelaide, and Perth - to at least 334,000 Australians; thousands followed his every move. This makes it Michael’s most successful tour stop in Australia in his career.

Jan. 4, ’97 – Michael Jackson performed to record crowds of 70,000 in Honolulu, Hawaii – his first U.S. tour stop since 1989. The two concerts held on Jan. 3-4 at the 35,000 seat Aloha Stadium made history – no other musical act ever sold out the stadium, and Michael sold out 2 shows in less than 24 hours — a record time. Hawaii promoter, Tom Moffatt said: I’ve never seen anything like it, …..there’s been nothing even close to this–the Rolling Stones, Elton John, Julio Iglesias, the Eagles. . . “ 

http://freeforumzone.leonardo.it/lofi/TUTTO-SULL-39-HISTORY-WORLD-TOUR/D653571.html

We haven’t got the footage from the Japan concerts in 1996 but here is the TV buzz accompanying Michael’s arrival on the History tour:

And here is Michael with his Japanese fans at Tower Records in December 1996:

.

If Meglen had kept his Fukuoka fiasco to himself it would have been only for his own good.  But since he disclosed it, now we know that amid the highly successful History tour one certain promoter from AEG Live did the impossible – he arranged half-full houses for Japanese fans.

Fiascos are actually a pattern with Meglen because after Fukuoka he also described his and other AEG people’s failure to get Michael Jackson interested in cooperation with AEG in the winter-spring period of 2007.

AEG HOPED “MJ WOULD PICK THEM”

Fan Appreciation Party March 9, 2007. Winners of the Fan Art Contest

Fan Appreciation Party March 9, 2007. Winners of the Fan Art Contest

From the way Meglen describes it AEG began to chase Michael Jackson immediately after he arrived from Ireland in the US.

We know it by the timeline – first they had two meetings with Michael, then they invited him to attend Prince’s show in Las Vegas promoted by AEG (in February 2007), then there was one more meeting and then all their effort ended in nothing. So all of it must have started as early as January 2007.

For This Is It concerts Michael Jackson was actually brought to AEG a year later when Tom Barrack set Michael’s work with AEG as a condition for his buying the foreclosure note on Neverland. Barrack was twisting Michael’s arms and this is probably why Michael had to agree.

The way AEG was chasing Michael in 2007 is actually the only interesting episode in the three days of Meglen’s testimony, so I will put it down in some detail – we really need to know how all of it started.

The AEG courtship of Michael Jackson began when Peter Lopez called AEG in early 2007 and they hurried to Michael Jackson to make a presentation of AEG hoping he would pick them:

ABC tweet say:

  • Meglen said he next met MJ in 2007 with Peter Lopez, MJ’s attorney at the time at the WynnHotel in Las Vegas.
  • The meeting was to let MJ know what AEG was about, Meglen said. Gongaware, Raymone Bain (MJ’s manager), Lopez, MJ were present.
  • MJ recognized Gongaware, Meglen said. He came out of the bedroom, “Whenever I see Paul Gongaware I know everything is going to be all right”
  • Meglen said MJ asked Gongaware about Brigitte, his girlfriend at the time. They wanted MJ to choose them for a comeback tour.

Quote:

Q. Now, you said Mr. Lopez called and asked you about this meeting. Did he tell you in advance what the meeting was going to be about?

A.Peter, when he called regarding going to meet with Michael in Las Vegas, it was about letting him know what AEG was about.

Q. So you understood it was a time for you to come and make a presentation to Mr. Jackson about AEG Live?
A. Absolutely.

Q. Did he tell you at that point that Mr. Jackson wanted to work live, or was it more open-ended?

A. No, it was more open-ended.

…Q. Who was at that meeting that you recall?

A. It was myself and Paul Gongaware, Peter Lopez, a lady named Raymone Bain, and she had another lady that worked with her, I cannot remember her name.

Q. And did you have an understanding as to Raymone Bain’s role at this time?

A. She introduced herself as Michael’s manager.

…Q. Do you remember any specific projects being discussed besides a King Tut miniseries that Mr. Jackson wanted to work on and a Vegas residency that Mr. Jackson wasn’t interested in?

A. It wasn’t a meeting to talk about, necessarily, specific projects. It was more of a meeting showing Michael who we were as a company.

…I brought three what we call sizzle reels on the company with me, along with kind of company brochure.

Q. And was the goal of this to convince Michael Jackson to hire AEG Live to produce a concert for him?

A. Well, it was to show Michael the breadth of AEG and you know, some of the cool projects that were were involved in and what we did so that, you know, he would – if he did work, that, you know, we hopefully would be the company he’d work with, or he’d think about us.

Q. So is that a yes, you were trying to get him to pick you?

A. Yes.

…Q. Now, one thing I meant to ask you at the beginning, how did Mr. Jackson look to you when you saw him?

A. He looked great. He was full of energy, he seemed taller to me, a firm handshake, and just – he was there, he was – he was very, very excited about everything.

Q. And how long was this first meeting?

A. Maybe two hours, hour and a half to two hours.

Q. Did Mr. Jackson seem in any way under the influence of anything, drugs or alcohol?

A. No.

Q. No signs of that?

A. No.

Japan March, 2007. MJ at the US camp Zama meeting the military and their families

Japan March 10, 2007. MJ at the US camp Zama meeting the military and their families. A confident man full of energy and looking great

Of course there were no signs of it. Look at Michael’s photos of 2007 – despite being older then his looks were much better than in the 2000s, when medications were really a problem for him.

ABC reports that almost immediately Gongaware took the lead on the MJ’s This Is It project. This is wrong.

Before Gongaware took the lead there were three more meetings with Michael Jackson which brought AEG nowhere and a full year before their next contact in 2008.

The first meeting was when AEG made a representation of their company. The second meeting in 2007 was solely about making films as Michael was not interested in anything else:

Q. Did you have a follow-up meeting after that first meeting with Mr. Jackson?

A.Yes, our second meeting – a month later, maybe, somewhere in that range, at Turnberry, which is a condo development in Las Vegas, and so we met there.

Q. And how did the second meeting come about?

A. I believe Peter arranged the second meeting, or called us, asked us to go to the second meeting. Could have been Raymone. I don’t remember. But we were asked if we would come and meet with Michael again.

Q. And what, if you recall, was the purpose of this meeting?

A. The majority of that meeting was for the lady who had co-written the King Tut miniseries to take us through that project.

Q. And who was there at the meeting?

A. Myself, Paul Gongaware, Randy Phillips came to that meeting, John Nelson, who runs the day to day in our Vegas operationk a amn named Chris Demoulin who worked for Walden media, and then a number of people -

 Michael’s side had grown from the first meeting.

Q. And was – were Mr. Lopez and Ms. Bain still there?

A. Yes, they were both still there.

Q. And you said Christ Demoulin from Walden media. I think you said Walden media was a film company?

A. Correct.

Q. And so were they brought to discuss this sort of film aspect of this miniseries?

A. Yes, because they were probably – we did not really have any television development organization within AEG. The closest things would have been our film guys.

Q. Were any other projects discussed at this meeting?

A. No.

And the third meeting was to see Prince’s show in Las Vegas which was in February 2007 according to an eye-witness who wrote that it was “NBA ALL -STAR WEEKEND FEB. 2007“:

Q. After those first two meetings, did you ever have a third meeting with Mr. Jackson?

A. Yes. Well, actually, after that meeting, Michael came that night to see Prince. We were at that time producing a – I guess you would call it a residency for Prince at the Rio hotel. It was called 3121. And Michael wanted to come over and see it, so Michael came over that night to watch the Prince show.

Q. Did you talk business at all with him at that meeting – I mean at that Prince show?

A. No. I mean, Michael showed up , I took him downstairs, there were – there was kind of a hospitality room downstairs, I – Michael actually showed up early, I was surprised. And Prince had two background singers. They were these two ladies who were Australian and were twins. And they said they had met Michael before, so I took him in and kind of let them all visit.

Q. And so no business discussions there?

A. No.

Q. Okay. And then did you have another meeting with Mr. Jackson after that?

A. Yes. We had another meeting in New York City with Michael after that.

Q. And do you remember when that was?

A. That was a few months later, quite a few months later, I think; and that meeting was at the Regency hotel in New York.

Q. And do you remember what that meeting was about at all?

A. That one, there were more — there were attorneys and accountants there for Michael. You know, I think at that time Raymone Bain was more pushing for some all-encompassing deal that didn’t really have anything attached to it. It was just —

Q. What do you mean?

…A. Well, I kind of understood what, you know – there was nothing specific attached to it. That’s why it was difficult. You know, when something like that happens, you go, “To do what? I want to do a deal, but to do what?”

…Q. After these first three meetings, did you have any more discussions with Mr. Jackson about anything?

A.No. It pretty much went pretty quiet from there. You know, for quite some time, we – it kind of just kind of – deals have a way of doing that at times. You can work on things; if there isn’t a deal to be made or something to be made, they just kind of go away.

Q. And so this just kind of went away?

A. Yes, this one just kind of went away.

Q. During all of these three meetings in 2007, was there ever a time at any of those meetings that you thought Mr. Jackson  looked like he might be under the influence of drugs or alcohol?

A. No.

Q. Was there ever a time he seemed anything other than alert?

Tokyo 2007 US camp MJ makes a speech

Japan March 10, 2007. MJ speaks at the US camp Zama

A. No. He seems – he had a lot of energy.

Q. Did he seem happy? Unhappy?

A. Very happy.

Q. But no deal was done at the time?

A. Pardon me?

Q. No deal was done at the time?

A., No, no.

Q. And at some point down the line, do you know whether Mr.Jackson came into contact with AEG Live again?

A. Yes, he did.

Q. When was that?

A. At least a good year later.

Q. And were you involved in that sort of second set of — of meetings, for lack of a better word?

A. No, not really. It was coming in through – through a different person in the company.

So the impression AEG bosses had of Michael when they first met him was:

March 9, 2007  "He was great, full of energy, firm handshake, he was very, very excited"

March 9, 2007 “He was great, full of energy, firm handshake, he was very, very excited”

  • “He was great, full of energy, seem taller, firm handshake, he was there, he was very, very excited.”

Michael indeed looked absolutely great. We can see it in the March 2007 Japan video, and to remember Michael the way he was only two years before his death I’ll post its next episode here too.

What did Tohme and AEG have to do to Michael so that his health so terribly deteriorated within so short period of time?

 VIP PARTIES FOR MICHAEL and NO NEED TO TOUR

As you remember the ticket for the VIP party was $3,400 which brought the organizers $400,000 and this means that more than a thousand people attended it. Michael got half of it according to Sullivan’s book, though not a single song or dance was performed by MJ there.

The VIP party was followed by a party for the ‘less affluent’ fans where the price of ticket was a more democratic $130, but still much higher than the ticket for AEG performances where he was supposed to toil for three hours on stage. What impressed me most is that at both parties nothing else but a mere handshake was expected of Michael and various artists were actually performing for him and not MJ for them.

Japan 2007, at a VIP party Michael had nothing to do but clap his hands and make a short speech

Japan 2007, at the VIP party Michael had nothing to do but clap his hands and make a short speech

This made me think that Michael did not have to do any AEG shows at all.

With his enormous popularity he could just throw VIP parties all over the world and if he also performed a song or two I have no doubt whatsoever that our oligarchs like Abramovich would pay him millions for a chance to entertain his oligarchy friends.

You can like or dislike them but they are definitely not greedy scrooges like Anschutz, and pay generously for a party they really enjoy. Our oligarch market alone could have provided for Michael a stable multi-million income if he chose to ever stoop down to them.

Here is the next part of the “Fan-deMonium. Chasing Michael Jackson” video from Japan, 2007. In this part Michael makes a speech at the VIP party putting on his spectacles and looking like a professor, and arranges a fan art contest at a fan party the prize for which is having dinner with him:

THE GREEDY SCROOGE

However we need to get back to our liar Meglen. To the lies already said he now adds that  it is “classics” for the artist to pay for producing the show and he repeats the usual AEG nonsense that profit was to be divided between AEg and Michael at the ratio of 90/10 (90% for MJ and only 10% for AEG):

Q. So when you say “net profits,” you don’t mean what the artists takes home at the end of the day?

A. No, no, The – the – the show net is classically the gross revenue left to be divided between the artist and the promoter, of which the artist then pays his touring expenses out of.

Q. So in this instance, the show net would be to the gross revenues minus what you spent to promote the show at the venue, and then that show net, if I have it right, would be split 90/10?

A. Yes, ma’am.

Q. And then you said there was an artist’s net?

A. The artist net then is you take the – take the share that the artist receives from the show and then the artist then has to pay all of his expenses out of that: trucks, buses, crew, musicians, all of his staffing on the road, all of the things that the artist classically pays for.

Q. And then what was left after that, that’s where AEG Live’s producer’s fee would be calculated?

A. Correct.

Q., So in this instance, the artist – the expenses of production, where do they fall?

A. On the artist’s side.

Ms. Stebbins: Is that good, your honor?

Judge: Yes, Okay. Tomorrow, return at 9:45.

Japan March 2007. MJ is going by a helicopter to the US camp Zama

Japan March 2007. MJ is going by a helicopter to the Camp Zama US Army post. This is how I would like to remember Michael

So he says that the artist is to “classically” pay all the expenses?

But if it is the classics of their business why did all the media in June 2009 lament that it was AEG that was losing millions of dollars and not Michael Jackson?

If it was “classically” the artist’s responsibility they should have lamented that it was Michael Jackson’s Estate that was to lose millions and not AEG, right?

It is time to recall now that for weeks after Michael’s death none of them, even AEG themselves, spoke of those expenses to be covered from Michael’s pocket and of the possibility of production expenses to be charged to the Estate.

At that time AEG and the media were talking solely of the insurance as a means to cover AEG’s losses and not a single mention was made of it being Michael’s responsibility:

AEG Live, the organiser of Michael Jackson’s concerts at the O2 arena, could lose millions from the cancellation of the concerts.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8120844.stm

AEG stands to lose a substantial part of its investment if its insurance policy won’t come into play—and that could depend on the cause of Jackson’s death.

http://www.thisisrnb.com/2009/07/aegs-ceo-randy-phillips-talks-michael-jackson-fallout/

More recently, Denver Post article cited a June interview in which AEG Live chief executive Randy Phillips said insurance had been secured for 23 out of fifty “This Is It” dates — certainly better than the ten gigs reported a few months earlier. If that’s the best AEG could manage, however, it could still lose tens of millions of dollars. Losses in that range would hardly bankrupt Anschutz, but they’d certainly give him another (very big) reason to mourn Jackson’s passing.

http://blogs.westword.com/latestword/2009/06/how_much_will_michael_jacksons.php

One of the ways to cover the losses was Randy Phillips’ selling the footage of Michael’s rehearsals, but again not a word was said about production expenses allegedly being Michael’s responsibility:

At the time of his death we’d already spent $33 million on production. No, it’s not the end of the company. Maybe to other companies, but not ours. Our mutual owner is a very wealthy billionaire. People speculated this would be the end, but I knew the value of the content we had. Just didn’t know how to monetize it. I shopped it around to studios and [there was] a bidding war between four studios, Universal, Sony, Paramount and Fox.”

https://www.examiner.com/article/examiner-exclusive-aeg-s-randy-phillips-talks-this-is-it-michael-jackson-and-more-part-ii

If it had been Michael’s obligation to cover all production expenses AEG would have never hesitated to immediately name the Estate responsible for them – however more than three weeks after Michael’s death AEG themselves were not so sure of it.

Of course AEG are always AEG and they were already making tentative probes in this respect, so  they did send their report to the Estate sometime in the first part of July 2009. However even now, at this trial, they say that the report was sent NOT with the aim to have them pay for the expenses and was for “information only”.

If production expenses had been Michael Jackson’s responsibility from the start of it do you think that AEG would have hesitated to approach the Estate at once and would have danced around this matter? No, certainly not!

And this means that they decided to shift all production costs onto Michael much later, and initially they were only probing the Estate for such a possibility:

Predicting the financial fall out would be messy as well as expensive, ultimately, AEG may have to file a claim against Jackson’s estate. 

http://entertainmentagentblog.com/2009/07/13/aeg-in-financial-shatters/

The next article clearly says that the production expenses were to be covered only by the insurance sum. Phillips also hoped that another source for compensation would be no need to refund all the tickets. And again there was no talk about taking the money from Michael Jackson’s pocket.

So when Meglen says that those expenses are “classically the artist’s responsibility” he is lying – initially production costs were not Michael Jackson’s responsibility. In the very worst case they were to be split between MJ and AEG:

Jul 6 2009 3:03 PM EDT 

Promoter Of Michael Jackson Concerts Could Erase Losses With Insurance, DVD Sales

AEG CEO Randy Phillips says, ‘I’m heartbroken, but the company is fine.’

By Gil Kaufman

Given that AEG had sunk more than $30 million into the production and is now offering full refunds to the nearly 1 million ticket holders, it would seem that the Los Angeles-based company could be in for some serious financial headaches as a result.

But, according to CEO Randy Phillips, that’s not necessarily the case. Speaking at a news conference last week, Phillips claimed that a combination of savvy insurance planning and a stronger-than-expected demand for the commemorative tickets for the now-canceled shows might help erase some of those potentially crippling losses, the Los Angeles Times reported.

“For the record, this great company I work for is not bankrupt,” Phillips said. “They’re not going out of business and they’re certainly not in trouble. I’m heartbroken, but the company is fine.” While AEG offered full refunds for the tickets beginning last week, Phillips said nearly half the concertgoers who’ve answered so far have opted to hold onto their commemorative tickets, which, if that ratio holds, could help the company break even on ticket sales.

The concert-promotions company might also be able to turn to insurance underwriter Lloyd’s of London to recover some of the production costs, such as salaries for nearly 200 employees, stages, aerial dancers, elaborate illusions and the price of expensive talent such as show director Kenny Ortega and choreographer Travis Payne. AEG reportedly bought a $17.6 million policy that covered the first 23 shows, but Phillips said the insurance payout would depend on the coroner’s final verdict on how Jackson died.

http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1615329/promoter-mj-concerts-could-erase-losses-with-insurance-dvd-sales.jhtml

And from one more article we learn that AEG actually did not even need any compensation of their losses. Since half the tickets did not have to be refunded as they were kept by MJ’s fans as memory, the sum of money thus retained by AEG was enough to fully cover all the money spent by AEG on the production.

But our AEG is a very greedy scrooge, so they wanted to have all of it - the money retained from the tickets sold, compensation of $40 mln from the Estate, the intellectual property costing $60mln (the rehearsal footage sold to Sony) and the insurance money for their “losses” to be retrieved from Lloyds as well…. And now they call Katherine Jackson “greedy”?

Regarding refunds, Phillips says AEG is currently seeing a retention rate of about 25% in an offer that runs through Aug. 14. He says 40% retention would allow AEG to recoup its expenses. What ticket retention doesn’t make up, intellectual property should cover costs that AEG has put at about $25 million and others have tagged as high as double that http://www.billboard.com/articles/news/268137/aeg-live-ceo-discusses-michael-jacksons-memorial-tribute-concert?page=0%2C1

Later Randy Phillips would admit that at least 40% of all tickets were retained by Michael’s fans.

The next day Meglen’s lies continued:

Tuesday July 23, 2013  DAY 54

  • Hello from the courthouse in downtown LA. Day 54, Week 13 of Jackson family vs AEG trial is under way.
  • Katherine Jackson is not present in court today. John Meglen, co-CEo of Concerts West, is back on the stand. Jessica Bina questioning him.
  • Meglen didn’t have involvement in Michael Jackson’s contract. He said after the initial meeting, there was a quiet period.
  • Then they met again in early 2008 and began discussions of what to do and where to go with MJ’s comeback tour.
  • The promoter said they considered London, the biggest market in the world, since it has a new, hot arena.
  • He said the strength of artist’s popularity is based on ticket sales, ticket sales of similar artists, record sales, radio time playing.
  • We did not want to start the tour in North America, Meglen said.
  • Meglen: We weren’t sure what the reaction, ticket sale would be in N America because of the historic stuff Michael had gone before in the US
  • Meglen said the other option was Asia, Japan especially. He has done a number of other tours in Asia.
  • However, Meglen said the economics wasn’t there for Asia, couldn’t get a high enough ticket price in China.
  • He said there are a lot of rich people in China, but a lot people with not as much money.
  • Meglen said MJ had sold stadium shows in London before, had a successful track record there.
  • The promoter said normally they talk about show net, what we call artist gross, is when discussing money.
  • You can’t compare net of artists because they all spend differently on the road, Meglen said.
  • The show net is where you determine the artist gross from, Meglen explained.
  • Meglen said he was not intimately involved in the budget tour and budget production, but has seen them and knows what a budget is.
  • Meglen said he was aware of talks about a worldwide tour with MJ.
  • Meglen: The London shows were the only approved shows from our standpoint at AEG. He explained that the only one that went thru the approval process was the London shows. It was a long way to the completion of the London shows, so Meglen said there was no urgency in figuring out where to go after that.
  • Meglen would have to approve a worldwide budget, he said. And it all depended on the London shows success and their review.

So Meglen says that those “50 shows” were the only approved ones?

This I cannot agree with as after Michael’s death AEG cried crocodile tears over losing more their $450 million from the future three and a half year long contract with Michael. Why did they speak of it to the Time magazine in 2009 if now they say that they never planned it? No, not only did they plan and approve, but they were also sure that all that money was already in their pocket, and it was the loss of it that they were so bitterly missing:

Now that stage will be dismantled — and AEG must deal with the financial aftermath. Jackson’s death means the firm will have to refund $85 million in ticket sales.

The company will also miss out on expected profits of $115 million from VIP packages and merchandising, and it will lose the chance at an additional $450 million from the three-year worldwide tour they hoped would follow the London gigs.

http://www.time.com/time/arts/article/0,8599,1907404,00.html

Oh, SO CELIN DION DID NOT REHEARSE?

From further Meglen’s revelations we find that it is customary for superstars not to rehearse. Celine Dion did not and it also made her director “freak out”, however AEG perfectly survived it:

  • Meglen said Paul Gongaware called Michael Jackson ‘Mikey’ because they knew each other.
  • The promoter said AEG advanced the money for “This Is It” tour.
  • The superstar deals: the selling of tickets is kind of a given, Meglen said. So they get out of guarantee and get profit participation.
  • They are worried about what their shares are as opposed to guarantee, Meglen explained.
  • This is the type of deal for Led Zeppelin, Elvis Presley, Neal Diamond, Meglen testified.
  • Meglen wasn’t involved in the production of TII. He has never met Dr. Murray and has not seen any draft agreement between AEG and the doctor
  • Meglen said he has been involved in tours where a doctor was part of the production. He named Rolling Stones, Celine Dion, John Denver.
  • Bina: Is it worrisome to have a doctor come on tour?
  • Meglen responded no, not at all.
  • He said you’re dealing with singers, sometimes you have a lot of dancers on shows, so doctors, physical therapists, chefs, not uncommon.
  • Meglen said he had never seen an AEG contract where the artist is required to rehearse.
  • Meglen said Celine Dion’s director was freaking out because she was not showing up for rehearsals.
  • The rehearsal is more for the people around the artist, Meglen said. He said it is very common for artists to use TelePrompTers.
  • Celine Dion, Meglen said, not only uses Teleprompter but has an ear piece with director speaking to her.
  • Meglen said he had one show in Las Vegas that didn’t sell tremendously well and they had to shut down production early. No names mentioned.

LAS VEGAS DEALS 

  • The promoter said the hotels in Las Vegas would not allow an artist to have a residency show with only 2 and 1/2 shows per week.
  • He said the hotels want customers every night, so resident shows need to have a constant schedule and few days off.
  • A residency show needs more than 2 and 1/2 shows per week to be able to pay expenses and make money, Meglen explained.
  • He said the promoter would be able to survive with only 2 and 1/2 shows per week, but not the artist.
  • Meglen said the average ticket price for a headliner show in Las Vegas currently is $100-$125.
  • An arena is an ambitious step to take the model of a Las Vegas show. Arena fits 50k-60k people, Meglen said.
  • Meglen said he has put together a show idea for Las Vegas involving Michael Jackson, but not a residential show.

The story about the residency show needing more than 2,5 shows per week is probably correct and this is why in 2007/08 Jack Wishna was working on a Las Vegas project where Michael’s show would run continuously but would present other artists for five days a week and Michael would perform just on weekends or four times a month:

The deal called for Jackson to perform only one weekend a month, Wishna said. The rest of the time it would be “Michael Jackson Presents,” with a lineup including major R&B performers like Usher, Jay-Z, Jamie Foxx and others. 

http://www.vegascommunityonline.com/2009/6/Jne09-w4-NFN_ClarkeColNorm-1313.htm

So we see it once again that in order to get his millions Michael was absolutely not obliged to perform every day for three and a half years as AEG was forcing him to – there were other opportunities open to him which the plaintiff’s expert Arthur Erk did not even include into his estimation (but probably should have).

At this point Meglen again reveals to us that it was AEG’s primary interest to get themselves involved in projects associated with Michael Jackson. After Michael’s death they realized the “urgency of it” and hurried up to approach the Estate before they finalized their deal with Cirque du Soleil. So previously they chased and courted Michael Jackson and now they are chasing and courting his Estate? Well, at least it puts things in the right perspective – without the Artist the promoter is Nobody – and I am happy that the Estate did not agree to do further business with AEG.

Actually the offer AEG made to the Estate was laughable – it was $60mln for 10 years. Well, even the late Jack Wisha arranged much more lucrative deals. For Wayne Newton, for example, it was $250 mln over 10 years, so the same or even better terms could be very well offered by Jack Wisna to Michael Jackson.

fan party. Japan March 9, 2007ABC tweets continue about the profit AEG was hoping to get out of Michael after his death:

  • Meglen: We proposed to the Estate a Michael Jackson Campus at the Planet Hollywood Hotel. 
  • It’d involve artifacts in MJ exhibit, items from Neverland, 2 restaurants, nightclub and a theatrical show directed by Kenny Ortega.
  • This was after Michael Jackson passed away. Meglen said this was never proposed before he died
  • Bina showed a document with a structural outline with the concept of the Las Vegas show, possible partners and numbers.
  • Meglen said they wanted to take this to another level, creating an entire campus as opposed to just a show and a boutique.
  • Meglen said he became aware the Estate of MJ was in talks with Cirque du Soleil for a show in Vegas, which gave AEG a sense of urgency.
  • The promoter said he got one meeting with the executor of MJ’s Estate, John Branca, but they were already involved with Cirque du Soleil.
  • Meglen: You run 10 years (in a residency show) and you hit a home run.
  • Meglen said they were very interested in a MJ Las Vegas show. He said he made an offer as attractive or better than Cirque’s proposal.
  • Meglen said there was a guarantee of $60 million over 10 years.
  • “The Estate told us they were not interested,” Meglen said.
  • While Michael Jackson was alive, Meglen said the ideal would be to have the artist live as a residency show. But that wasn’t an option.
  • He said tribute shows don’t do well when the artist is alive, since people want to see the actual performer.
  • Meglen said he probably has never proposed an India concert. “Nobody goes to India,” Meglen said.
  • Jacksons attorney objected saying Meglen has no experience in India. Judge sustained.

LIES ABOUT THE NUMBER OF SEATS

There is simply not a single point in Meglen’s testimony where he wouldn’t be lying.  It is in AEG interests now to downplay everything connected with MJ as they are desperate to minimize their possible losses. Hence Michael Jackson “is not the best artist”, hence the stadiums had fewer seats than Arthur Erk projected, hence all the rest of it said with the sole aim to cut the sum to be paid to Katherine Jackson.

Meglen’s next lie concerns the number of tickets sold for Michael Jackson’s shows:

  • Meglen explained the stadiums normally don’t allow sale of full capacity. The stage is big, when you sell all around is called 360 degrees.
  • The projections the Jacksons expert produced is more than that, Meglen said. He estimated they would sell 220 degrees in MJ’s shows.
  • All stadiums and arenas have suites and the promoters and artists don’t get to charge them, Meglen said.
  • People buy the suites on an annual basis and it includes concerts. The building gets the money, not the promoter or artist.
  • Meglen said you can’t put an arena show into a stadium, specially because of the size of the stage and the production.
  • It’s also much more expensive to do a stadium show, Meglen explained.
  • Rolling Stones had 59,000 people, the maximum capacity they could have at The Rose Bowl, Meglen said.
  • The Rose Bowl is one of the biggest stadiums in the country and there is the idea that it fits 100k people, Meglen explained.
  • You’re lucky if you can hit 60 (thousand), Meglen said.
  • Bina shows another exhibit. There’s dispute as to which exhibit has been admitted already or not. Judge sent jury to lunch.
  • Outside the jury presence, Panish complained to the judge that AEG’s attorney Jessica Bina handed over copies of exhibits to the jury.
  • He said the proper procedure is to hand the documents to the clerk or bailiff and let them handle them to the jury.
  • Panish said the attorneys should not have any contact with the jurors whatsoever. Bina said it was not her intention, apologized.
  • Afternoon session is set to resume within 40 minutes.
The tickets sold for MJ's shows and the O2 arena seating capacity

The tickets sold for MJ’s shows and the O2 arena seating capacity. http://www.thewonderwall.com/tickets/blog/2009/03/11/michael-jackson-seating-plan-for-london-o2-arena/

I cannot believe that AEG is disputing now even the number of the seats sold.

Meglen claims that the seats available for Michael Jackson’s fans made only 220 degress of the arena. Though the number of seats was indeed less than the full circle 220 degrees are actually a big lie –  the screen shots of the arena seats from AEG’s official sources Ticketmaster and Viagogo present a different picture.

To the right is the seating plan for This Is It shows from Ticketmaster published in 2009.

The number of seats is far from the 220 degrees claimed by Meglen – I’ve taken the trouble to calculate (where are my $800 per hour?) and came to the number of the seats offered for sale to be close to 306 degrees.

The calculation is simple:

220 degrees make up approximately 60% of the full 360 degrees (180 degrees would be 50% or a half of all seats). Now look at these screenshots – do you have the impression that the seats sold were slightly over half of the available seats? No, even a brief look shows that it is much more than 60% claimed by Meglen.

Here is a closer look at the official seating plan from the Ticketmaster – my rough estimation of the seats offered at that time is 85-86%

O2 arena seating capacity (with rough calculations)

O2 arena. For MJ concerts they offered roughly 85-86% of its seating capacity

And below is a seating plan from Viagogo.

It is slightly smaller which is no surprise – Viagogo was offering the VIP seats only which in some cases were not even offered by Ticketmaster (the C2 area, for example, and some sections on the floor area which were taken out of the Ticketmaster plan).

Viagogo seating plan for MJ's concerts. It includes section C2 of premium tickets which are not even offered by Ticketmaster

Viagogo seating plan for MJ’s concerts. It includes section C2 of premium tickets and parts of  floor sections not even offered by Ticketmaster

LIES ABOUT THE PRICE OF TICKETS

Meglen told so many lies in his testimony that it is impossible to focus on all of them, so now I will try to single out only the most outrageous ones.

The ABC tweets:

  • John Meglen resumed testimony in the afternoon. Bina showed him plaintiffs’ Highest Grossing Tours chart created by Erk from Wikipedia data.
  • Bina: Which tours you promoted all or portion of tour?
  • 18- Bon Jovi
  • 13- Pink Floyd
  • 12- Eagles
  • 11- Celine Dion
  • 8- Rolling Stones
  • More shows:
  • 38- Paul McCartney
  • 37- Justin Timberlake
  • 35- Bon Jovi
  • 34- Britney Spears
  • 30- Bon Jovi
  • 28- Pink
  • 26- MJ HIStory
  • 20- Bon Jovi
  • Meglen did 7 whole tour, 3 North America and 2-3 did some shows of the highest grossing shows.
  • He said he’s familiar with endorsements and sponsorship deals involving a tour. Meglen worked on two shows of MJ’s HIStory tour.
  • Bina said there was a lot of testimony about the fast pace of sales of tickets. She asked if he has seen any other show sell that fast.
  • Meglen: Yes, Voodoo Lounge, Division Bell we almost sold out immediately, we call instant sell outs
  • Meglen: Those were stadiums tours and when we put them on sale we rolled into multiple stadium dates, that’s about as high as it gets.
  • Rolling dates means opening more dates based on demand, Meglen explained. He said initially 10 shows for TII was sold, then 31, 50.
  • Bina: Was this the best selling show you’ve ever seen in your career?
  • Meglen: No, because it was a relatively lower ticket price. We sold as many tickets on Voodoo Lounge as fast as we sold MJ.
  • In numbers of tickets sold in a day, sure, we have done those kinds of numbers before, Meglen explained.

ALL of it is a big, big LIE. This is how Michael’s shows were selling:

Tickets sold at a rate of 11 per second, 657 per minute and nearly 40,000 an hour.

The number of tickets to be sold was actually about a million and not 750,000 as AEG claimed and this alone shows how many seats at the arena were put up on sale. According to Randy Phillips the sale of that tour was a cultural phenomenon never to be repeated: 

They also claimed that one million tickets would be sold in all, a total which they say would set records for “the biggest audience ever to see an artist in one city” and “the most amount of people to attend a series of arena shows”.

Randy Phillips, the president and CEO of AEG Live, which is promoting the concerts, said: “We knew this was showbusiness history, but this is a cultural phenomenon… Not only are these concerts unparalleled, these records will never be broken.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/music/4981357/Tickets-go-on-sale-for-Michael-Jackson-London-concerts.html

What’s true is that AEG set the price too low. And the reason for that was not their fear that they would not sell (as they now claim) but their desire to make Michael perform a bigger number of shows.

If Michael performed 10 shows at the price of tickets five times as high he was to generate the same income, but that system would close to AEG the opportunity to sell a huge number of tickets at exorbitant prices on the secondary market.

No, they wanted him to perform 50 shows at minimal prices while they would sell them with a huge surplus over their nominal price. And mind you, “Michael Jackson’s role, if any, in the markup plan wasn’t clear” as the Wall Street Jornal put it.

Thus some 1700 premium tickets were put aside per show for Viagogo via whom AEG was officially selling them. If we multiply 1700 premium tickets by 50 shows the result will be 85,000 premium tickets sold at thousands of dollars – with Michael role still “unclear in the markup plan”:

Tickets to Mr. Jackson’s run at the O2 arena were normally priced at £50 to £75 ($70 to $105). Those seats sold out in five hours, according to AEG, which is owned by billionaire Phil Anschutz’s Anschutz Corp. AEG says it set aside about 10% of the seats, or 1,700 a night, as “official premium” tickets, to be sold for several times those prices.

Mr. Jackson’s role, if any, in the markup plan wasn’t clear. His manager, Tohme Tohme, declined to comment.

The main ticketing Web site for the concert series, MichaelJacksonLive.com, contains a link to Viagogo, where premium tickets are mixed in with resold tickets. The latter are supposed to be offered only by fans, though there is no way to determine whether any given ticket is being resold at a markup, or part of the premium offering. On Sunday, the higher-priced tickets were £145 to £275. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123698868280226077.html

* * *

Daily MailTickets for his extended series of 50 summer shows sold out in record time yesterday with prices of up to a staggering £25,000 being demanded on the resale market….

L.A. TimesThere’s still plenty of tix available, at least for those willing to pay. On the second night of the tour, you can get a pair for $4,217. The ticket prices on the secondary market drop substantially as the run continues, however. If you have faith that Jackson will perform all 50 of his dates (and why would anyone be skeptical?), then you can commit about $700 to see him in February 2010.

http://www.thedailyswarm.com/headlines/michael-jackson-imposter-aeg-cant-insure-london-concertsscalper-tickets-selling-4klawsuit-filed/

* * *

Last night tickets for seats closest to the stage were on sale on Viagogo for thousands of pounds. Other seats in prime locations seemed to be on sale at surprisingly uniform rates, with many priced at  £418 and £659. 

AEG Live did not deny its links to Viagogo. The company previously said in a statement: “In an effort to ensure fans are able to purchase premium tickets and exchange tickets directly with other fans, AEG Live has entered into an agreement with Viagogo. The online site allows people to buy and sell live event tickets in a safe and guaranteed way.”

A source close to AEG Live said: “This is the hottest ticket of the decade. To suggest that there won’t be a premium market is unrealistic. We want to make sure it is done properly and fans are not buying the tickets in some dodgy back alley. This is only a small minority of tickets.

Fans who signed up for ticket updates received an email last night saying: “We have now sold out of the presale ticket allocation for 30 shows. Michael Jackson has agreed to add more shows.” It is understood that the O2 has set aside 50 dates for Jackson if the demand exists.  http://www.viagogo.com/About.aspx?HelpID=1002690

* * *

Phillips defended the Viagogo deal, saying making a premium on such a small number of tickets allowed more tickets to be sold for £75.

“If it’s £100 for Tina Turner and £160 for Madonna, what should it be for the comeback shows of the biggest pop and rock star the world’s ever seen?” he said, adding he believes he could have sold 200 Jackson shows at the O2.

http://www.pollstar.com/news_article.aspx?ID=654875

So Randy Phillips believed that they could sell 200 Jackson shows in London alone? And now their Meglen and Eric Briggs are telling us nonsense about no more than 50 shows trying to pull wool over our eyes?

BORING LIES

It is even boring to analyze the rest of Meglen’s stories – that MJ is not the greatest artist, that it is okay for organizers to call him a freak if they speak in private or email to each other, that we should not believe the official numbers of the tickets sold (which they themselves advise to the media) or that we are to believe that everything is going fine for the AEG as Phil Anschutz says.

I leave the rest of it for you to form an opinion of your own:

  • Japan March 2007 Fans gathered early for the evening party to start

    Japan March 2007 Fans gathered early for the evening party to start

    Meglen said he negotiated a number of tour deals, from Beach Boys to Sunkist, Good Vibration deals.

  • Sponsor puts a name in an event, Meglen said. Endorsement is when product/company associates name with an artist, artist does commercials.
  • Meglen said the Rolling Stones sponsorship with Citibank was $2.5 million, which is not near 42% of the gross revenue.
  • Bina: Was sponsorship 42%?
  • Meglen: No, there’s no correlation, I’ve never heard anything like it
  • Meglen said there were no endorsements deal for the This Is It tour. Bina said she had no more questions at this time.
  • Panish, in re-cross, asked: Is Paul Gongaware truthful?
  • Meglen: Very truthful
  • P: And Randy Phillips?
  • M: Yes
  • Panish: Do you agree with your boss’ Phillips and Gongaware MJ was the greatest artist of all time?
  • Meglen: I don’t know what their opinion was. I believe that they believe that.
  • Panish: Do I believe MJ was the biggest artist of all time?
  • Meglen: No, I do not
  • Panish: Who is?
  • Meglen: I think Michael is big in pop world, but in my opinion Rolling Stones and Led Zeppelin — “I’m a rocker”
  • Meglen and Dion have been working together for 12 years. He’s familiar with a lot of her shows.
  • Panish: Is Celine Dion honest?
  • Meglen: Yes
  • Panish: What did you testify was the maximum capacity of stadium in France?
  • Meglen: I don’t believe it is 80,000
  • Meglen: Generally, 30% of the numbers that your expert project you have to take out because it gets you to the salable number.
  • Panish: So what’s the maximum seating capacity for that stadium in Paris?
  • Meglen: I don’t know exactly, I’d say 60 to 70,000
  • Panish: Isn’t it true Celine Dion sold 90,000 tickets at that stadium in 1999?
  • Meglen: I don’t know if that’s true, didn’t promote that show. It sounds like too big a number to me, Meglen said.
  • Panish said it was 180,000 people for two shows.
  • Exhibit: Rose Bowl Cap Rolling Stones VooDoo Lounge, 2 shows
  • Plaintiff’s Stated Capacity: 92,542
  • Actual Capacity: 59,570
  • Difference: 32,972
  • Meglen said he met with his attorney 5 days to prepare for his testimony. He was subpoenaed at lunch time and Bina said they will respond.
  • The maximum capacity of shows I’ve done at the Rose Bowl was 59,570, Meglen testified.
  • Panish: Isn’t it true U2 had 97,000 people attend at the Rose Bowl?
  • Meglen: That’s not true
  • Fan Appreciation party, Japan March 9, 2007

    Fan Appreciation party, Japan March 9, 2007

    Panish: It was reported on Billboard Magazine

  • Meglen: I wouldn’t believe it
  • Panish showed Meglen the Billboard Magazine article. He asked how many tickets were sold at U2 performed in Oct 2009 at the Rose Bowl?
  • Meglen: It looks like they (Billboard) reported 97,000.
  • Meglen: I have done Pink Floyd and Rolling Stones, we try to sell as much as we can, we got to roughly 60,000.
  • Panish: Are you an expert in stadium?
  • Meglen: I think I am pretty much an expert in the field.
  • Meglen said that to him, the biggest stadium cap he played was in Columbus, Ohio for a concert and he got in over 60,000.
  • Meglen: You assume I believe and agree with those numbers because they are on Billboard magazine. Those numbers are often inflated.
  • Panish asked if Meglen will do anything he can to protect AEG. “I’m here to tell the truth,” Meglen said.
  • Defendants’ objected, said it has nothing to do with this case.
  • Panish: How much do you get paid by AEG?
  • Panish argued this goes to show a bias. He said he’s under a 5 year contract with discretionary bonus.
  • Judge sustained it. Panish asked if Meglen gets paid a lot by AEG. He said a lot to one person is not a lot to another.
  • Panish asked what’s a lot. Meglen said a million/year. Then Panish asked if Meglen gets paid a lot. “I’m not paid a million dollars a year”
  • Panish asked about Meglen’s reference to work with animals. “I told you yesterday that the people I worked are like animals,” Meglen said.
  • I still work with animals. He said he was referring to crews and guys who work with him assembling shows and taking them down in hours.
  • Panish asked if Meglen respects artists. He answered yes. He then asked if it is ok for AEG to refer to an artist as freak or creepy.
  • People will use terms about an artist that people have used before, Meglen answered.
  • Panish asked if it’s appropriate for AEG to call artist a freak. Meglen said no.
  • Panish asked if Meglen thought it was appropriate for your lawyers to refer as freaks or creepy?
  • Meglen: I don’t believe it is yes or no answer. I believe if people are communicating in a personal level is different from being in public. It would not be a appropriate is it was in a public fashion, Meglen opined.
  • Meglen said he doesn’t believe it’s a yes or no answer.
  • Panish: But in private it’s ok?
  • I think when someone is having a private conversation and later if that becomes public, that can change things, Meglen said.
  • Meglen: Freak had been used numerous times prior, I don’t believe it was appropriate term for him to use but term that had been used before.
  • Japan March 2007 At a VIP party

    Japan March 2007 The VIP party

    I think creepy” is not that bad of a word,” Meglen said. He told Panish he’s sure they both have been called creepy behind their back.

  • Meglen said they always want to do what’s best for the artist. He had some disagreements with his old boss.
  • Panish asked Meglen to assume Gongaware wrote an email and said tell Murray, remind him it’s AEG, not MJ, paying his salary.
  • Panish showed Gongaware’s email to Meglen. He said he’s seen the email on the newspaper.
  • Panish: You told me “who’s paying your salary” is “where your bread is being buttered.”
  • Meglen: I said Mr. Ferrell told me ‘you know where your bread is buttered.’
  • Panish asked if it’s appropriate for one of AEG’s executive to call an artist “freak” and “creepy.”
  • In the context of this email, I’d be only speculating what Paul was doing, Meglen said.
  • Panish asked if AEG hired Celine Dion’s doctor. Meglen said no. Celine’s company pays her doctor.
  • Meglen said they did not negotiate Dion’s doctor’s contract and cannot terminate him.
  • Meglen: No, it was negotiated by their tour producer
  • Panish: Did AEG negotiate the doctor’s contract for Rolling Stones?
  • Panish asked if it’s true the producer generally negotiates the contract with doctors, physical therapists, etc.
  • Meglen: It can be producer’s responsibility to hire the doctor if there is a doctor on the tour, if artist requests them to do that
  • In a video deposition, shown to the jury, Meglen said it’s the producer’s responsibility, many times.
  • AEG Live was the producer for MJ’s This Is It tour.
  • It can only be done with the approval of the artist, Meglen said. “You can’t hire people in these positions without the artist approval.”
  • Meglen said he was told Michael wanted to bring his doctor on tour. He was not involved in negotiating the contract with Dr. Murray.
  • Meglen said he had heard of some of the doctor’s request in their executive meeting.
  • I don’t know who was negotiating, I had simply heard the doctor requested money, Meglen said.
  • Meglen: During one of our executive meetings, it was brought to our attention that Murray was asking for $5 million.
  • Gongaware was the one who brought it up. Meglen said it was kind of understood the amount was excessive and it was not going to happen.
  • Panish: Isn’t true Celine Dion’s doctor is paid for out of show production budget?
  • Meglen: I pay Celine Dion an amount of money, to which she pays the doctor out of that money.
  • Meglen: I asked if Michael was interested in doing a Celine-type show and he said no
  • Panish: You never proposed a MJ show when he was alive?
  • Our policy is we do not have a deal until we have a signed contract, Meglen explained.
  • We do not consider a deal done until there’s an executed contract, Meglen said.
  • He said just because Murray agreed to money offer by MJ via Gongaware does not mean a deal was consummated.
  • Meglen: No, that’s not common
  • Panish: Is it common at the executive committee to talk about the artist’s doctor?
  • That probably never happened, Meglen said.
  • Panish asked when was the last time the committee discussed an artist’s doctor.
  • Only Rolling Stones and Celine Dion have had doctors on tour under AEG.
  • AEG did not have a contract with Celine’s doctor, Meglen said. They did not negotiate the doctor’s payment, could not fire the doctor.
  • Meglen said he does not know if Dion’s doctor set her schedule up.
  • AEG paid the per-show operating expense to CDA production who in turn paid the doctor, Meglen said about Celine Dion.
  • Regarding the Rolling Stones, Meglen said the doctor worked for the band, which means worked for principals and band members.
  • Meglen said AEG did not negotiate the contract with the doctor for the Rolling Stones.
  • Meglen: Yes
  • Panish: AEG give money to the Rolling Stones?
  • Panish asked if it was $18 million. Meglen said there was advance/other securities, doesn’t know if the Rolling Stones have to pay it back.
  • Meglen: We did not produce the Rolling Stones show, we only promoted the Rolling Stones tour.
  • Celine Dion’s doctor was on the original operation budget by AEG for her show. He was listed to be paid out of the weekly operation expense
  • Meglen said Dion’s doctor was her responsibility to pay.
  • AEG does not pay doctors, Meglen said. “We do not hire doctors, we could advance on behalf of artists.”
  • I know we don’t hire doctors, Meglen said. He was not involved in a day-to-day details.
  • Japan. March 2007 People waiting in line to get to a fan appreciation party

    Japan. March 2007 People waiting in line to get to a fan appreciation party

    Panish asked if Meglen spoke with Mr. Anschutz about the trial. Meglen said he asked what he thought about the trial.

  • I think it’s going fine, we have not presented our case yet, Meglen said Anschutz responded.
  • Meglen: He looks skinny, he looks skinner than when I saw him. That’s all.
  • Panish showed the picture of MJ in June 2009.
  • I’m not a doctor. It’s not for me to decide whether being slander is healthy or not healthy, Meglen explained.
  • Panish asked about the meeting with MJ in 2007. “I’m very proud of the assets of AEG, but I don’t think I was bragging about it.”
  • Meglen said he would not go in a meeting about movies since he is not in the movie business.
  • He said he showed the company’s movie sizzle reel to MJ because he wanted to show the quality of their work.
  • How would I know what MJ wanted to do? Meglen said.
  • Judge adjourned session and jury is ordered back at 10 am PT tomorrow. Attorneys ordered at 9:30 am PT.
  • Next AEG’s witness is Eric Briggs, a retained expert in projections and evaluation in the entertainment business (to counter what Erk said).
  • We hope to see you here tomorrow. For all the latest watch @ABC7 and go to http://www.abc7.com. Have a good night everyone!

WHAT DO THESE AEG BOSSES KNOW AT ALL?

I don’t know how the poor jurors listened to Meglen for the third day running and all his lies rehashed once again. Meglen denied even the most obvious things – for example, the fact that it was never Michael’s obligation to attend rehearsals.

He said he ‘didn’t know if it was his contractual obligation”, however he never reviewed the contract either, never met MJ’s people, did not take part in negotiations, never saw emails to AEG showing that Michael’s health was deteriorating – in short what does this person know at all?

If you want to omit what Meglen doesn’t know anyway I suggest you skip the third day of his testimony and go straight to the end of the post to see the last part of the Japanese “Fan deMonium” video showing Michael visit the US Camp Zama in Japan – Michael met thousands of military and their families screaming and greeting him there. It will be much more interesting than Melgen’s sad lies.

Wednesday July 24 DAY 55

  • Hello from the courthouse in downtown LA. Day 55 of Jackson family vs AEG trial is under way.
  • Katherine Jackson is back in court today. This is the first time she came to court after taking the stand.
  • John Meglen resumed cross examination. Brian Panish, attorney for the Jackson, did the questioning.
  • Panish showed the Rose Bowl chart defendants created and asked what’s the maximum seating capacity in the Rose Bowl?
  • I believe the seating capacity for a football game is 100,000, Meglen said.
  • Meglen: There are many factors that go into that
  • Panish: For a music concert?
  • Meglen: You’ll need to tell me the size of the production in order to tell you
  • Meglen: U2 Concert was called 360, so I’m assuming it sold 360 degrees.
  • Meglen said he was at the Rose Bowl but didn’t watch the U2 concert. Panish asked if 97,000 people sounds right.
  • Meglen: No, I’m not aware of that because I was not involved in the show
  • Panish asked if Meglen was saying the Rose Bowl can’t fit 97,000.
  • I’m not trying to tell you that, it depends on the size of the production. Michael was a stage end production, Meglen opined.
  • Meglen: If you have a center stage, 360 in the round with a small stage in the middle, you could probably get 97,000, yes.
  • Panish asked if Billboard Magazine was wrong about U2 having 97K people.
  • “I told you I do not believe the numbers on Billboard” Meglen said
  • Panish showed picture of U2 concert at the Rose Bowl. Meglen said the floor is not completely filled up.
  • Panish asked how many seats are in the Rose Bowl. Meglen said the stadium is around 100,000 people.
  • Panish: You told us yesterday you spoke with the promoters of U2. Who did you speak with?
  • Meglen: Jerry Barae — he’s in Chicago
  • Meglen: I never disputed what U2 sold at Rose Bowl. I cannot tell you how much are paid tickets, how much are what we call ‘paper ticket’
  • VooDoo Lounge, 180-200 degrees, you can sell 60,000 seats, Meglen said.
  • Panish asked if Meglen spoke with someone promoting the U2 concert at the Rose Bowl and that there were only 60,000 people there.
  • Meglen said that was not true.
  • Panish: If you testified to that it is a lie, then?
  • Meglen: I don’t believe that’s what I testified to
  • I said that I don’t believe it, Meglen said, “and I still believe that’s not true. My answer said it is not true they had 97,000.”
  • Meglen: When I talk about ticket sales, we talk about paid tickets. We don’t really care about people who don’t pay tickets
  • No one from U2′s group told me that 97,000 people did not attend the Rose Bowl, Meglen said.
  • Meglen explained he based his opinion on his experience promoting and producing stadium shows for 35 years.
  • Meglen smiled at Panish.
  • Panish: Is it funny Mr. Meglen?
  • Michael Jackson in Japan March 2007

    Michael Jackson in Japan March 2007

    Judge: Mr. Panish, don’t argue — she shook her head

  • Meglen said he’s been working with Gongaware for 35 years.
  • Panish asked if Meglen agrees with Gongaware that the sale of MJ’s tickets was the fastest ever in the industry.
  • Meglen: I don’t think I agree with that statement, but I think that’s what Paul thought.
  • Panish: Do you agree or disagree this is the most amazing ticket sales Mr. Gongaware has ever seen?
  • Meglen: I agree that’s the most that Paul had seen
  • Meglen said he has done tours for 35 years, probably hundreds of tours.
  • Panish: Do you agree with Randy Phillips, the CEO of AEG, believe Mr. Jackson had an obligation to attend rehearsal?
  • Meglen: I don’t know the context of which this question was asked. You are asking me to opine on what Randy was thinking
  • Meglen: I don’t know if Michael had a contractual obligation. Randy may have felt Michael was obligated, but don’t know it was contractually obligated, Meglen said.
  • Meglen: I agree that an artist should go to some of the rehearsals, yes
  • Panish: Do you agree with Randy Phillips that MJ was a bigger artist than Celine Dion, yes or no?
  • Meglen: I do, myself, personally believe that that is not true In my opinion Celine is right up there with Michael Jackson and is bigger, Meglen said.

Celine Dion is an outstanding singer, but I still wonder if any fan will be paying $3,400 for a mere chance to see her and shake her hand.  This probably answers the question of “who is bigger”. The TMZ conducted a public opinion poll:

Celine Dion Bigger Than Michael So Claims AEG

It’s Billie Jean vs. Titanic, and AEG claims the ship wins hands down. Translation — AEG is trying to convince the Michael Jackson jury that Celine Dion is bigger than MJ.

AEG exec John Meglin is on the stand in the wrongful death case, scoffing at the Jackson family’s claim that Michael would have earned $1.5 billion had he lived.

Meglin told the jury it’s his opinion Celine is a bigger star and therefore more bankable than MJ ever would have been. Yet according to reports, Celine is worth a measly $400 mil.

Fun facts: Jackson ranks #3 in most albums sold worldwide — more than a billion (behind the Beatles and Elvis) . Celine ranks #9 at 200 million albums.

As for Grammys, MJ also has her beat with 13 Grammys to her 5.
So we gotta ask … Bigger:

MJ – 83%
CD – 17%

Total Votes: 33,834

http://www.tmz.com/2013/07/25/aeg-celine-dion-michael-jackson-wrongful-death-lawsuit/

  • Panish played Meglen’s deposition, where he was asked when he recalled the negotiations with MJ started. Meglen said Summer or Fall 2008.
  • Panish: Is that the truth or not, sir? Or you don’t know the truth?
  • Meglen: It’s the truth, but I’m not good with dates, need to look at my calendar
  • Meglen said he was not at the table during the negotiation, he would be at the office doing his work.
  • Meglen: I was not personally involved, face to face, with MJ’s people
  • Meglen said that the negotiation is not only the contract, but various internal conversations about the tour.
  • As CEO of Concerts West, it’s my job to review any negotiations people are having regarding tour, Meglen said.
  • Meglen explained he was involved in the internal discussions, in conversations with Gongaware and Phillips.
  • He never reviewed the contract as was being drafted, Meglen said.
  • Meglen said he was not involved in “This Is It” movie. Panish said he was credited as co-producer of the movie.
  • Japan March 9, 2007 Fan Appreciation party

    Japan March 9, 2007 Fan Appreciation party

    Meglen said he was a co-producer of the show not the movie.

  • Meglen explained Gongaware has not been involved in Celine Dion’s tour, but they give each other credit.
  • The exec said he gave input in ticket prices, scaling and places to have the show.
  • Panish played video deposition, where Meglen said he doesn’t recall if he was involved in the forecast for MJ tour.
  • Timm Wooley is friends of Meglen. They haven’t discussed the trial. The last time they saw each other was in London for Rolling Stones show.
  • Wooley doesn’t work for AEG, but to Rolling Stones now. Hougdahl “Bugzee” is working for Shania Twain.
  • Panish showed an email from Gongaware about MJ first draft of worldwide tour projection. It lists “net to Mikey $132 million.”
  • Email: It’s a big number, but this is not a number MJ will want to hear. He thinks he is so much bigger than that. If we use show income, it’s over a quarter of a billion dollars. His net share works out to be 50% after local venue and advertising costs, which is quite good. His gross will approach $ half a billion. Maybe gross is a better number to throw around, if we need to use numbers with Mikey listening.
  • Panish: Isn’t Paul Gongaware suggesting to lie to Michael Jackson?
  • Meglen: No he is not

This email by Gongaware is a vivid example of the way AEG were deceiving Michael Jackson.

First, when speaking to him they used gross sums instead of his net income. And second, look at these figures – the gross sum was about half a billion, but the net was to be only $132 million, so the rest of it (roughly $350 million) was to be put into AEG’s pocket, and this was twice as much as the sum earned by the artist!

No, no matter which way we calculate it we always come to no less than two thirds of profit for AEG and only one third of income for Michael Jackson.  And despite all that AEG keeps repeating their mantra about a 90/10 division of profit! Are you as sick and tired of AEG lies as I am?

  • Panish asked Meglen is he knows Dr. Finkelstein. He said he asked which tour he was in with Michael Jackson.
  • Meglen said he saw Dr. Finkelstein at the Coachella festival. He got tickets from AEG.
  • Meglen spoke with Gongaware about previous MJ’s tour. He knows that Michael canceled a tour because MJ entered rehab.
  • Panish showed email Gongaware sent with the attachment of the worldwide MJ tour and cc’d to Meglen.
  • It lists cities, the amount of shows and weeks in Europe, South Africa, Asia (and Middle East), India and US.
  • Panish: You told us yesterday no one goes to India
  • Meglen: Not that many do. Again, I told you very few people, no one as in few people
  • Panish: Is Beyonce no one?
  • Meglen: No, she’s a very popular
  • Meglen said he thinks MJ did one or two shows in India.
  • Panish: Do you know she went to India?
  • Meglen: I have not idea
  • Japan March 2007. At a US camp Zama "Thank you!"

    Japan March 2007. At the US camp Zama Michael Jackson greeted Americans and thanked them

    Panish also named Shakira, Akon, 50 Cent that went to India. The email projection shows 3 shows in India plus one private for MJ.

  • Meglen said he does not believe MJ could sell 200 shows in London. Panish said Randy Phillips said that.
  • My opinion is no, that he he could not have done 200 shows in London, Meglen testified.
  • Panish showed an email from Phillips saying “We could have done 200+ shows based on demand.”
  • Meglen said he does not believe that is true. “He believed that, I don’t believe that.”
  • No one has a crystal ball in our business, Meglen said. “He could’ve done 200 shows is purely speculation on his behalf.”
  • Panish asked if Phillips was more hands on than he was in “This Is It” tour. He said yes.
  • I don’t know if I agree there were 525,000 people in the queue, Meglan opined.
  • Everybody exaggerates, and when something is hot everyone wants to take it to the moon, Meglen said.
  • Panish asked Meglen to assume Randy Phillips told the truth. “I know it’s a big assumption,” Panish said.
  • Defendants’ attorney objected, judge sustained it and asked to go to sidebar to talk to attorneys.
  • Attorneys went to judge’s chamber and talked for about 10 minutes. They came back and judge broke session for lunch.
  • Panish corrected himself about number of people living in India. Earlier he said several billion people live there, but should be millions.
  • I understand you are mistaken, Meglen said. “It doesn’t mean you are a liar.” Panish said he would not respond to Meglen’s comment.
  • Regarding India, Meglen explained: “I don’t think it’s a small market, I think it’s an under developed market.”
  • Meglen said he knows that Michael played in India, heard from Panish that Beyonce went to India.
  • Panish: When you testified yesterday, you didn’t know anyone that had gone to India, correct?
  • Meglen: No, that’s not correct.

Well, Michael Jackson did go to India in 1996, and was welcomed there with much enthusiasm. In 2009 the capacity of the entertainment market in India was surely much bigger. Here are an episode of MJ coming to India on the 1996 History tour:

  • Panish: Are there a lot of stadiums in the world that hold more than 60,000?
  • Meglen: Yes, there are a lot of soccer stadiums in the world
  • Meglen said he does not recall how many times MJ sold out in London.
  • Panish: In Australia?
  • Meglen: Yes
  • Leonard Cohen — AEG promoted and produced worldwide tour, Meglen said.
  • Panish: Did you hire a doctor for Leonard Cohen?
  • Meglen: We do not hire doctors
  • Panish asked if Meglen has had experience where the CEO is involved in doing an intervention with an artist.
  • Meglen said he’s aware of it happening before in the early 80s, not at AEG. He was involved minimally in the intervention.
  • Meglen said he has not had emails from show managers at AEG saying the artist was deteriorating.
  • I’ve had situation where the production manager had emails about the artist’s behavior, Meglen testified.
  • I’ve had situations where artists had been sick before, yes, Meglen said.
  • Panish: Have you ever called the doctor for 30 minutes to discuss the artist’s condition?
  • Meglen: No
  • Panish asked if Meglen had ever seen an email saying AEG wanted to remind the doctor they are paying the bill. The exec said no.
  • Meglen: I’m aware of us checking people out.
  • We don’t hire doctors, if the artist wants his doctor there, the way we check that out we go to the artist, Meglen said.
  • If I’m asking the artist if that’s his doctor, that’s throughly checking him out, Meglen explained.
  • Meglen: I asked MJ if he was performing this and he told me he did not want to do (a residency show in Las Vegas).
  • I think MJ would have to do over 2.5 shows a week or you couldn’t have such a deal, Meglen said.
  • In re-direct, Jessica Bina asked about the proposal for the Las Vegas show in 2010 with MJ’s Estate.
  • There are numbers for per week, per year for the first 5 performance years, then next 5 performance years, Meglen explained.
  • Meglen said he became aware Cirque du Soleil was anxious to get a deal done with the Estate to have a MJ show.
  • Meglen said his argument was that there was something better to do.
  • Meglen: We don’t have a crystal ball (on whether show would be successful or not)
  • Bina asked if artist is in the middle of stadium with microphone if there are reasons the show couldn’t be filled to capacity. Meglan said no.
  • Bina: But does it happen very often?
  • Meglen: No.
  • Meglen: Artist has to be comfortable with all around stage, production becomes very challenging and incredibly expensive as well as sales
  • This Is It was not set to be a 360 degree show, Meglen said. He noted it was quite the opposite. MJ’s production was $26-$27 million.
  • Meglen said for TII to become 360 degree tour, there would be cost associated with it. “Pretty much, it would have to be a new production.”
  • Meglen explained 180-240 degrees in front of the stage is the standard in the business.
  • Meglen said if he could sell more tickets for TII he would have. “It’s nothing but profit at that point.”
  • The executive said there was never a conversation about making TII show 360 degree.
  • Meglen said again he doesn’t agree with Phillips’ opinion that there were 200+ more shows to be done in London.
  • Meglen said putting 13 million tickets on sale was not on his mind. He expected the London shows to do well.
  • The executive said when MJ said “This is It” people thought that was it. But if he went to other cities, this was not it after all.
  • Meglen said that at the time MJ died there were only 50 shows agreed upon between MJ and AEG.
  • Meglen said that for lower ticket price TII was a great sale.

Well, first of all Michael did not agree to 50 shows and they are not mentioned anywhere in the contract or any written document between AEG and Michael Jackson, and second, not only cheap tickets sold extremely well but premium tickets as well. Actually from the AEG own budget we gathered that premium tickets brought AEG one fifth of all the money collected:

JULY 3, 2009

It is understood that tens of thousands of tickets were sold on Viagogo with the bulk of them at prices ranging from £300 ($492) to £400 ($656) each.

Viagogo’s official VIP packages for the Jackson shows [… ] cost between £700 ($1,150) and £800 ($1,300). http://routenote.com/blog/viagogo-starts-refunding-fans-for-michael-jackson-concerts/

  • Panish: Were Paul Gongaware and Randy Phillips more involved in TII than you?
  • Meglen: Yes
  • The executive said he never told Gongaware and Phillips the projection was bad, only that he thought it was a long ways to get to the end.
  • Meglen said Beatles’ “Love” and Cirque du Soleil “O” are two of the most successful conceptional shows.
  • Bina showed Gongaware’s email again: Here’s the first-draft look at a worldwide tour… you can’t pin this down now… too many variables.
  • Meglen said it’s not possible to see the Beatles anymore, since some members are dead.
  • Meglen: If Michael was still alive and touring, I would not be interested in doing a MJ conceptional show.
  • Panish asked if MJ wanted to go worldwide, AEG would’ve been able to make that happen. Meglen said he could’ve set up the arrangements. I cannot tell you how many more Michael Jackson tours he could’ve done it, it’s pure speculation, Meglen said.
  • Panish: Did you know MJ told his children they would go on a world tour?
  • Meglen: I have no idea
  • Meglen was excused.

Oh, my God, and I almost lost hope that this torture would ever end! When Meglen said he was to set up arrangements for Michael’s world tour I was tempted to say “No, thank you – we still remember how you were selling tickets to the Fukuoka Dome”. With knowledgeable promoters like Meglen of AEG Live even one show would be a pure speculation, not to mention a whole tour…

I know that all of it was enduring so we deserve to relax and enjoy ourselves with the last part of “Fan DeMonium” video from Japan 2007. This part shows Michael at the Fan appreciation party where he picked up winners of the fans art contest, and continues with his visit to the US military camp in Japan.

This is how I would like to remember Michael.  If it were not for AEG even today Michael would feel, look and be the same.  As they said in the film Michael was his own Army of One.

What did they do to him to make this vigorous and great-looking man meet his death only two years later?

The video ended with great words of wisdom about the way we perceived Michael Jackson.

He was simply the mirror we saw ourselves in. We saw him the way we are:

We don't see things as they are, We see things as we are ANAIS NIN

“We don’t see things as they are,
We see things as we are”
ANAIS NIN

Transcripts of Meglen’s lies were obtained by TeamMichaelJackson:

http://teammichaeljackson.com/archives/9131


Filed under: AEG THE HORRIBLE, Jacksons vs. AEG Tagged: AEG, John Meglen, Michael Jackson

Jacksons – AEG trial Week 14. AEG’S EXPERTS and the FUN, THRILL and MESS of it

$
0
0
Eric Briggs

Eric Briggs

Who could expect that the testimony of some AEG’s experts would be so big a thrill? And occasionally fun too?

So while the fun is going on I suggest we stick to Eric Briggs and John Meglen before discussing those medical professionals and MJ’s drug issues AEG made so much noise about. AEG promises us that there will be still ‘many, many of them’ so there is no hurry.

PURE COMEDY GOLD

I had the first real laugh since the beginning of this trial when reading the article by Alan Duke published last week and the comments following it. The impression Meglen’s testimony produced is that he and Briggs are not only burying their business with their own hands but they are also digging the grave for the whole industry by exposing some of their own and others’ ugly secrets.

Meglen, for example, says that he “knows how numbers are manipulated” in their business and Briggs revealed the unsavory truth that performers get “much less” than the gross sums generated by them for their promoters.

In short this is the information that simply can’t be missed:

AEG Live exec: ‘Celine Dion’s bigger than MJ’

By Alan Duke, CNN

July 25, 2013 — Updated 1415 GMT (2215 HKT)

Los Angeles (CNN) – A top executive with AEG Live insists Celine Dion is a “bigger” artist than Michael Jackson.

John Meglin, testifying Wednesday at the wrongful death trial of AEG Live, also downplayed how many tickets Jackson could have sold if he had not died while preparing for his comeback concerts.

AEG Live lawyers are challenging an entertainment expert hired by Jackson lawyers who estimated the King of Pop would have earned $1.5 billion touring the world before his 66th birthday had he not died from an overdose of a surgical anesthetic at age 50.

Michael Jackson’s mother and three children contend the company is liable for damages because it hired, retained or supervised the doctor convicted of involuntary manslaughter in his death.

If jurors agree, they could then use estimates of Jackson’s lost earnings as a guide to determine how much AEG Live — the promoter and producer of his “This Is It” tour — must pay the Jacksons in damages.

AEG Live lawyers argue that Jackson — not its executives — chose and controlled Dr. Conrad Murray, the doctor who signed a $150,000 a month contract with the company to serve as Jackson’s doctor for the tour. AEG Live executives never signed the contract, which Murray returned to them just hours before Jackson’s death.

A nurse anesthetist will testify Thursday about administering anesthesia to Jackson during a medical procedure. He will be the first of what AEG Live lead lawyer Marvin Putnam said would be a parade of “many, many” medical professionals who treated Jackson. The company will try to prove that Jackson was a secretive drug addict, which prevented promoters from knowing about the dangers he faced under Murray’s care.

Meglin, who has been a concert promoter since the 1970s, is the CEO of Concerts West, the division of AEG Live that was in charge of Michael Jackson’s tour. He was the first witness called as the company began presenting its defense in the 13th week of the trial.

Much of his testimony was focused on attacking the analysis of certified public accountant Arthur Erk, who testified last week that he was “reasonably certain” that Jackson would have performed 260 shows around the world as part of his “This Is It” tour. He would have earned $890 million over the three years of concerts in Europe, Asia, South America, North America and Australia, Erk said.

Jackson would have earned at least $1.5 billion from touring, endorsements and sponsorships had he lived to age 66, Erk said.

Erk’s analysis suggested Jackson would stage many of his shows in large stadiums, with more than 90,000 fans buying tickets to many of the concerts. But Meglin testified that his experience told him that no stadiums would seat that many people for Jackson’s kind of show. The Erk estimates were inflated by about 30%, Meglin testified.

The Rose Bowl would only seat 60,000, Meglin said. Although Billboard Magazine reported that U2 performed for 97,000 people in the Pasadena, California, venue in 2009, Meglin said he was “trusting my gut” that the numbers were inflated. “I know how those numbers can be manipulated,” he said.

Jackson lead lawyer Brian Panish noted that 98,000 people were in the Rose Bowl seats when Michael Jackson performed the halftime show for Super Bowl 27 in 1993.

Meglin also contested Erk’s suggestion that Jackson would have taken his tour to India for at least three shows.

“Nobody goes to India,” he said. He later acknowledged that Jackson performed there during his HIStory tour.

“It’s not a very big market,” Meglin said of India, which is home to about 1.25 billion people.

Meglin also disagreed with what one of his superiors, AEG Live CEO Randy Phillips, wrote in an e-mail that there was enough demand in England alone to sell out more that 200 Jackson shows. “He believed that,” Meglin testified. “I don’t believe that.”

Fans bought all 750,000 tickets put on sale for 31 shows in March 2009 in just two hours, Phillips said. Enough buyers were already registered to sell out another 100 shows, Phillips wrote.

Meglin also disagreed with Phillips’ opinion that Michael Jackson was the biggest entertainment artist ever.

“I do myself personally believe that that is not true,” Meglin testified Wednesday. “In my opinion Celine Dion is right up there with Michael Jackson and, to me, she is bigger.”

http://edition.cnn.com/2013/07/25/showbiz/jackson-death-trial/index.html

The comments from various people were fantastic:

  • AEG is smoking something.
  • Crack.
  • This Meglin clown is hurting their case with his used car salesman testimony.

John Meglen of AEG Live

John Meglen of AEG Live

Meglin: “The Rose Bowl would only seat 60,000.” 
Lawyer: “But Billboard reported that U2 performed there for 97,000.”
Meglin: “My gut tells me those numbers can be manipulated.”
Lawyer: “98,000 were there the last time Mr. Jackson performed at the Rose Bowl.”
Meglin: “Oh.”

Lawyer: “Mr. Jackson would have taken his tour to India for at least three shows.”
Meglin: “Why? It’s not a very big market.” 
Lawyer: “India is home to about 1.25 billion people.”
Meglin: “Nobody goes to India.”
Lawyer: “But didn’t Michael perform there during his last tour?”
Meglin: “Oh yeah.”

Lawyer: “Your boss said the demand in England could sell out 200 shows.”
Meglin: “He believed that. I don’t believe that.”
Lawyer: “But all 750,000 tickets for the first 31 sold out in two hours, and buyers were already registered to sell out another 100 shows.”
Meglin: “Oh.”

Lawyer: “Mr. Jackson was one of the biggest artists ever worldwide, right?”
Meglin: “Eh, even some Canadian artists are bigger. Celine Dion. Justin Bieber. That group that sang ‘Afternoon Delight’.”
Lawyer: “Starland Vocal Band wasn’t from Canada.”
Meglin: “Oh.”

Who at AEG decided to put this trainwreck on the stand? Pure comedy gold.

Pure comedy gold indeed. And since the comedy continues this week too I suggest we follow it first and therefore offer you a summary of the news from the first three days of week 14 of the trial.

MONDAY JULY 29, 2013. DAY 58

After a short video deposition last Friday on Monday Briggs started with his testimony live. You remember that he was hired by AEG as their main expert to refute Arthur Erk’s estimates of MJ’s potential earnings.

And judging by what we have already heard of Briggs’ testimony it should be a no less hit than Meglen’s ridiculous performance.

First of all Briggs revealed the shocking truth that AEG was to pay Michael Jackson only $22 million out of the several hundred millions he was to make for these AEG by exploiters by performing 50 shows.

And previously AEG said something totally different:

May 31, 2009

Jackson stands to earn $50 million for the O2 shows, “This Is It” — $1 million per performance, not including revenue from merchandise sales and broadcast rights. Jackson is considering options including pay-per-view and a feature film. But the real money would kick in after his final curtain call in London.

AEG has proposed a three-year tour starting in Europe, then traveling to Asia and finally returning to the United States. Although Jackson has committed only to the O2 engagement thus far, Phillips estimates ticket sales for the global concerts might exceed $450 million. Such a rebound could wipe out Jackson’s debt.

http://articles.latimes.com/2009/may/31/entertainment/et-michael-jackson31/2

AEG never told Michael the real figure of $22 mln. for the London shows.  Moreover he probably even didn’t know of $50 mln mentioned in the above article – the figures AEG bosses were operating when talking to him were much higher. Paul Gongaware advised his colleagues to talk to Michael in gross figures and that would be almost half a billion if I remember it right.

The reality is different of course. The lion share of that half a billion was to go into AEG’s pocket and Michael was to receive the sums AEG were too ashamed to even say outloud. For a worldwide tour it was something like $132 mln, but even this may not be the right figure. Actually with AEG you never know the right figures. You don’t know your contract, you don’t have the documents, you don’t know your numbers – actually you know nothing. This is AEG’s very special knowhow.

Monday July 29, 2013 DAY 58. The ABC tweets:

  • Hello from the courthouse in downtown LA. Week 14 of Jackson family vs AEG trial is underway. There was only morning session today.
  • AEG’s retained expert, Eric Briggs, was back on the stand. Sabrina Strong, AEG’s attorney, resumed direct examination.
  • Strong asked about Briggs opinion on the completion of the 50 shows agreed by Michael Jackson at the time of his death.
  • The expert said it was speculative to assume MJ would complete all 50 shows in London.
  • Slide: Erk’s TII Tour: Speculative
  • A slide shown to the jury relates to a world tour that would be speculative, Briggs said.
  • 1- No agreement beyond 50 shows
  • 2- MJ’s drug use
  • 3- MJ’s history if cancellations
  • Slide: 4- World tour depends on completion of 50 shows
  • a- Performance Risk
  • b- Execution Risk
  • However, Briggs said numbers 1 and 2 also relates to the 50 shows in London.
  • Briggs said MJ’s history and manner of drug use and lasting affects are supporting basis for opinion that 50 shows were speculative.
  • MJ had a significant history of canceling projects, even if they were reasonably sure to happen, Briggs said.
  • Briggs said he evaluated Mr. Erk’s numbers regarding the 260 shows.
  • Jacksons atty Brian Panish asked for sidebar. It lasted 23 minutes.
  • Regarding the 260 shows Erk calculated, Briggs said the expert’s projection was unprecedented for gross ticket sales and revenue perspective
  • Briggs said the highest grossing tour ever is U2 360 Show, which generated $736 million in ticket sales and merchandise.
  • Tour Gross Revenues: Tickets/Merchandise
  • 1- U2: $736 million
  • 2- Rolling Stones: $558 million
  • 3- AC/DC: $441 million
  • 4- Madonna: $408 million
  • Briggs said what’s actually received by the artist is much smaller that the gross number and it is based on the expenses of the tour.
  • If the production is expensive, Briggs said the net to AC/DC members could be higher than the net to U2 members, even though U2 grossed more
  • MJ’s Highest Grossing Tours:
  • BAD generated $126 million for 120 shows
  • HISTORY generated $165 million for 82 dates in 1996-97
  • Briggs said the Dangerous tour was not included because it was not reflected in the list of highest grossing tours of all times.
  • Dangerous tour was cut short due because MJ entered rehab, Briggs explained.
  • AEG’s Predicted Future Tours:
  • Prod 1: $94 million
  • Prod 2: $107 million
  • Strong asked Briggs how AEG’s 2009 Budget compare. Erk projected $1.65 billion for 260 shows tour, he answered.
  • Clearly this is in excess of anything we’ve ever seen in the history around the world, Briggs opined.
  • Briggs said Mr. Erk was projecting $900 million to be paid to MJ as net for tickets, endorsements and merchandising.
  • Based on the record, this amount was nowhere near what MJ had brought home in the past, Briggs testified.
  • Briggs said Paul Gongaware testified MJ’s Dangerous tour lost money, it was not profitable. He also testified HIStory tour was a break even.
  • Net is the value of tickets and merchandising minus all the costs to put on the show, Briggs explained.
  • Regarding the HIStory tour, Briggs said, based on Gongaware’s testimony, there must have been costs that made the tour break even.
  • What’s implied is that MJ did not generate any significant net from this tour, Briggs said.
  • Briggs testified that AEG’s budget shows that MJ, if he completed all 50 show shows, would’ve taken home between $22 and $31 million.
  • This amount included tickets and merchandising, but not endorsement, Briggs said.
  • Briggs: As Jun 2009, no endorsement was in place, no sponsorhip was in place. AEG Live had taken steps to secure them but none were in place
  • Briggs said Erk projected MJ would net $890 million from a 260 world tour shows between tickets, merchandising, endorsements and sponsorship
  • I don’t know how anyone can be reasonably certain this would occur, Briggs said.
  • The highest grossing tour of all times was U2′s 360, Briggs said, which was $736 million. Erk’s projection for MJ to net was way above that.
  • It’s completely out of line of with history, with MJ’s own history and history of all other tours, Briggs opined.
  • If there’s no tour, there’s no merchandise, the expert said.
  • Briggs’ experience with endorsement relates to working with the estate of major artists, like Elvis and Frank Sinatra.
  • They were approached many times by large companied to put their names on products to sell.
  • Briggs explained the industry uses a “Q” score data, which draws the likability of a celebrity or persona.
  • Briggs said there are two major types of factors that companies take into consideration to select artist to endorse:
  • 1- history in securing endorsement, relationship with previous sponsors
  • 2- how predictable the artist is, how stable his/her actions are
  • Companies are looking for safe bets, Briggs said. “They don’t want to take big risks with their products.”
  • Briggs explained the companies are concerned about what general public thinks of the artist/celebrity.
  • Briggs: The tour gross relates to people being interests in seeing someone perform. MJ was a great performer.
  • But there’s a difference between excellence as performance of stage and whether the company wants to align itself with performer, Briggs said
  • Briggs said the “Q” score data associated with MJ analyzed his albums’ sales, actions taken by AEG, and MJ’s stability and predictability.
  • Briggs explained data companies call people and ask how much they like a certain artist, their “Q” score.
  • They then report the results back to the brand company to decide how safe a bet an artist is.
  • Briggs received two sets of data:
  • MJ likability
  • MJ comparative group (Bruce Springsteen, Elton John, Justin Timberlake)
  • Judge wanted to know what kind of questions the company asks people in the survey.
  • Briggs said the question is about the person’s impression of the artist, with normally 3-5 choices for answer.
  • The questions are not as much if a person would buy a product, but their impression of the artist, Briggs explained.
  • Q score survey:
  • Question: What’s your general impression of individual/celebrity?
  • Answers: One of my Favorites, Very Good, Good, Fair/Poor
  • Briggs said it’s useful to look at comparison with other artists, how they stack up against others that are similar to the artist in question.

Briggs said that Michael Jackson’s “likability” as a performer was doubtful for product endorsement deals. This is the first time I heard of any product endorsement and had to look it up. The dictionary said:

Product Endorsement Definition:
A written or public statement by a celebrity, business or professional group extolling the virtues of a product and recommending the use of the product to the public. A product endorsement from an authoritative figure is a key element in business advertising and marketing campaigns.

The Super Bowl 1993

The Super Bowl 1993

The above made it clear that the ultimate aim of those who started Michael’s persecution in 1993 and never stopped until his dying day was his complete financial ruin.

They wanted to fully destroy his image so that his name lost all its attraction and selling capacity and no one wanted to be associated with him or his music. This is why after 1993 the sale of his records turned for Michael into an uphill battle irrespective of the finest quality of his albums and the fact that he still sold millions was actually a miracle.

This is how his music proved its absolute value.

The number of his records after the 1993 scandal cannot be compared with the Thriller numbers – no, it should be compared with the zero number of albums which other artists would have sold under the same circumstances. And it was only due to Michael’s unrivalled genius that he still managed to overcome the negative trend and still sell millions.

I think that with the necessary adjustments made for the horrendous war conditions he was working in one million of the Dangerous album sold should be regarded as ten million in peace time, and this is true for each album following next.

It was this absolute top value of his music and performance that made his London shows instantaneously sell out and still leave half a million people waiting in the line.

The unprecedented demand for the tickets and the very fact that AEG pursued Michael Jackson for two years before they “nailed him down” for a contract are the factors their expert Briggs is not even mentioning now. Therefore I want to remind everyone what Randy Phillips and Meglen used to say about Michael Jackson only four years ago:

TW: Take us back to how you talked MJ out of retirement. How were you able to convince him?

Randy Phillips: I talked to him/pitched him about a year and a half earlier. He turned me down, but I’m resourceful and relentless. I (eventually) talked him into it. One year and a half later, Tom Barrack from Colony Investments, who saved Neverland Ranch, helped him restructure his finances. He approached me and said MJ wanted to talk to me personally.

http://www.examiner.com/article/examiner-exclusive-aeg-s-randy-phillips-talks-this-is-it-michael-jackson-and-more-part-ii

John Meglen: “Early on, there were a lot of different representatives around Michael, so weeding through that was always a very, very difficult thing,” Meglen says. “I think the important point was that, what we laid out to Michael was the breadth of the company, of AEG. I think from the very get go, we kind of planted into Michael that we were a great match for him.”
http://www.billboard.com/biz/articles/news/1263248/aeg-execs-discuss-the-making-of-michael-jacksons-this-is-it

In late November, Randy Phillips, President and CEO of AEG Live, said that the company — which books and runs the O2 — has been chasing Jackson for two years looking for a multi-night engagement. Though no deal was signed at the time, Phillips said AEG has had a “standing offer” to Jackson since 2006 to re-create his landmark Thriller album in its entirety at the O2 but had struggled to nail down a firm deal with the elusive singer.

http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1606272/michael-jackson-expected-announce-london-concerts.jhtml

And this is what their expert Briggs is saying now:

  • Briggs said there’s data for “Q” score from 1990 to 2006, with some gaps. There’s no “Q” score data between 2006 and 2009.
  • Strong showed a chart of MJ’s “Likability,” which declined after 1993. The chart shows a Negative-Positive Impression.
  • Briggs said that in 2006, there was 1 (one) person with positive impression for every 7.4 people with negative impression of MJ.
  • Briggs said in 1993, MJ’s likability was pretty well in line with other artists. From that point, it declined substantially.
  • In 2006, Briggs said the chart shows that there were 7.4 negative impressions for 1 positive regarding Michael Jackson.
  • Briggs explained that in 1993 there was a start of some significantly negative headlines associated with MJ, his drug abuse and other issues
  • There’s no data available from 2006 to 2009. Briggs said he requested the data but was unable to get it.
  • He said if someone’s likability is so negative, they take those people off the list, since no company would want to align itself with them.
  • Judge asked Briggs if MJ could’ve been compared to an individual artist, such as Justin Timberlake, as opposed to a group of similar artists
  • He said the norm is to compare with the average of the group with the artist in question.
  • Briggs said Mr. Erk specified album unit sales for five of MJ’s albums. “It also showed a significant decline,” Briggs said.
  • MJ’s albums sale:
  • 1982 — Thriller — 65 million
  • 1987 — Bad — 45 million
  • 1991 — Dangerous — 32 million
  • 1995 — HIStory — 20 million
  • 2001 — Invincible — 13 million
  • Briggs testified MJ had a significant issue in the media related to negative headlines in a broad of topics.
  • That would impact a company’s decision on endorsements/sponsorship. Companies are focused on selling, Briggs said.
  • The expert explained there was a significant audience that wanted to see MJ perform.
  • He said AEG took steps to secure endorsements and sponsorships but was unable to do so.
  • I don’t know how he can predict that all  of the sudden the light switch would be turned on Briggs said about Erk’s endorsement projection
  • The expert said there were no endorsement or sponsorship deals at the time of MJ’s death.
  • Strong asked why Las Vegas deal was speculative. Briggs said there was nothing in the works, no budget, agreement or financing.
  • Beyond that, there’s no real precedent for living, touring artist, who has a tribute show.
  • Briggs testified there aren’t any meaningful, premium-type of show, associated with a living performing artist.

Note: For performing artist this may be more or less correct, but as to non-performing artists tribute shows may be a very big thing. ABBA no longer perform but I hear that their Mamma Mia musical has been the world’s most successful musical ever.

So all Michael had to do was announce to the world that he would never perform after the London tour for the tribute shows to start selling like hot cakes.

However Briggs goes on with his own ideas:

  • In my business, just expressing interest it doesn’t mean it’s going to happen, the expert opined.
  • He said they were ideas and he sees ideas thrown around all the time.
  • Briggs: Las Vegas is a very competitive market. Every hotel wants a show that appeals to a broad audience.
  • It’s hard to make big bets if there are high questions about likability and predictability.
  • Entertainment is about finding an audience, Briggs said. “No one can predict if it will be successful until you sell the tickets.”
  • Briggs said his understanding is that MJ’s Estate did not agree to AEG’s proposed Las Vegas tour.
  • Briggs said in Erk’s projection, MJ would go into movies, but he did not provide figures in this regard.
  • Briggs’ “Film Production Process”: – Ideas – Development/Packaging – Financing – Pre-production planning – Production – Post production – Advertising – Distribution – Theatrical release – Profits?
  • Briggs said there were efforts taking place at one point for MJ to make movies. He considers it to be in the development phase.
  • It absolutely does not mean it would be getting to the end of the process, Briggs opined.
  • Briggs said the decision to make films is multimillion dollar one. The commitment is very serious, you can’t make movie with a million dollars
  • A movie can be hundreds of millions of dollars, Briggs said. And a lot needs to be in place, like audience, distributors, etc.
  • He said just advertising a movie in the US can be 50+ million dollars.
  • Briggs said the last feature film MJ was associated with “Miss Cast Away,” released in 2004-05 and it went straight to video, not in theaters
  • Briggs said that even at the distribution phase, it doesn’t mean film will be profitable/successful. “It’s all a risk up until this point.”
  • Only after 3-6 weeks in the theater it’s possible to figure out if the movie is profitable or not, Briggs said.
  • Briggs named some big films that have been disappointments: John Carter, Battleship, Jack the Giant Killer.
  • Briggs: These movies had big actors, big dollars, big movie studios and big decision process that can’t always be right.
  • Each studio releases 15-20 films/year, Briggs said, and only about half of them are known to the public.
  • Just because you make something it doesn’t mean it will go on to critical success, Briggs said.
  • Briggs: Mr. Erk simply stated he believed Michael would do movies.
  • Briggs said there were periods of times where MJ would have great connections in the movie industry, then fire them only to hire them back.
  • Great connections do not equate that things will get done, let alone be successful, Briggs testified.
  • Briggs: “Not everything that’s attempted is a resounding success.”
  • Regarding MJ’s personal history with respect to feature films, Briggs was emphatic: “I do not believe MJ was successful,” the expert said.
  • Even Mr. Erk said he was not successful in movies, Briggs said.
  • Briggs: I don’t know how anyone can project, with reasonable certainty, that MJ would be successful at making movies.
  • Court adjourned until tomorrow 1:30 pm PT with Briggs back on the stand for another half day session.
  • Rebbie Jackson was to testify on Wednesday but is sick. Other witnesses expected this week: Debbie Rowe and Randy Jackson via video depo.
  • We hope to see you all tomorrow for full coverage of the trial. Watch @ABC7Courts for the latest and http://www.abc7.com

TUESDAY JULY 30, 2013. DAY 59

.

The next day of Briggs’ testimony brought us a sensation that the Estate was allegedly helping the AEG case.

This was so enormous a surprise that all the rest of it faded in connection with this news.

One of the witnesses at this trial (I think it was Katherine Jackson) said that it is actually the Estate that is covering the expenses of the plaintiffs in their case against AEG, so comparing this with the latest news from Briggs made a complete mess until some things clarified a little the next day.

And the next day it turned out that Briggs had done two separate jobs for AEG and the Estate with a 3 year difference between them and was not working simultaneously for both companies, but even despite that the Estate did not give him a permission to testify in the case.

However on Tuesday Briggs assured everyone that Jeryll Cohen, a lawyer for the Estate, “okayed him to testify” and “acknowledged his work on the case”, which sounded almost like an encouragement for Briggs to speak against Katherine Jackson.

On Tuesday Briggs also said that Ms. Cohen had waived any potential conflict between the Estate and Briggs.

I may be wrong in my interpretation but to me this “waiving a potential conflict” sounded like negating a conflict of interest between the parties which can also be understood as the Estate acknowledging that they are on AEG’s side and there is no conflict whatsoever between them.

This is how the whole thing looked to everyone on Tuesday July 30, DAY 59 of the trial. The next day things changed, but Alan Duke already wrote an article about it which contained some very interesting details not available from the ABC tweets.

From it we learn that Briggs said he sought and gained permission from the Estate to waive any potential conflict of interest and that Ms. Cohen was well aware of “everything that was going on”.

I have my ideas about all these Briggs’ statements but will reserve them until a moment when everything hopefully gets fully clarified:

Michael Jackson’s estate consultant helps AEG Live’s defense

By Alan Duke

updated 9:45 AM EDT, Wed July 31, 2013

Los Angeles (CNN) – A lawyer for Michael Jackson’s estate gave an entertainment industry consultant permission to help AEG Live in its defense of the wrongful death lawsuit filed by the pop singer’s mother, the expert testified.

The revelation was a surprise to Katherine Jackson, who was sitting in court Tuesday listening to the expert testify that he believed her son would not have earned any money even if he had not died of a propofol overdose.

If jurors decide AEG Live is liable in Jackson’s death, testimony by Eric Briggs – whose company billed the concert promoter $700,000 to prepare his opinion – could be used to determine how much in damages the company would have to pay to Michael Jackson’s mother and three children.

Briggs, however, previously consulted for the Jackson estate in determining a value of it’s biggest asset — the Sony-ATV music catalog that includes the Beatles songs. He testified that before he signed a contract to serve as an expert in AEG Live’s defense he sought and gained permission from the Jackson estate lawyer Jeryll Cohen to waive any potential conflict of interest.

“She (Cohen) was well aware of everything that was going on,” Briggs testified.

A spokesman for the Michael Jackson estate was unaware of the circumstances or reasons why the estate would approve the waiver that could be counter to the interests of its beneficiaries — Jackson’s mother and three children.

An entertainment industry analyst hired by Jackson lawyers testified he was “reasonably certain” Jackson would have earned $1.5 billion from touring before retiring if he had not died while preparing for his comeback concerts in 2009.

Briggs testified that it was “speculative” that Jackson would have even completed the 50 “This Is It” concerts that AEG Live had already sold out in London.

Briggs said that based on what he’d learned from testimony in the case, he believed that Jackson would have died before the first show — even if he had not suffered the fatal overdose of a surgical anesthetic on June 25, 2009. He cited the testimony of a doctor who said that Jackson would have been dead within a week if he remained under the care of Dr. Conrad Murray.

The Jackson lawsuit contends AEG Live is liable in Jackson’s death because it negligently hired, retained or supervised Murray, who was convicted of involuntary manslaughter in the pop icon’s death.

The Erk opinion included $300 million that he estimated Jackson would have earned from endorsements and sponsorships. But Briggs testified that “significantly negative headlines, drug abuse and other issues” had ruined Jackson’s ability to earn endorsement and sponsorship money.

“Q score” data for Jackson, which measures his “likability,” became dramatically negative by 2006 — a year after he was acquitted in a child molestation trial, he testified. More than seven people said they disliked Jackson for every one who said they liked him, he said. Companies would be “very anxious” about putting someone with such a negative “likability” next to their products, he said.

One issue hurting Jackson’s endorsement deal potential was his financial debt, estimated to be $400 million at the time of his death, Briggs said.

But Jackson lawyer Brian Panish asked Briggs if he considered that Jackson‘s assets — most notably the Sony-ATV catalogue — were greater than his debts.

Briggs stuttered on the witness stand, saying he was reluctant to discuss Jackson’s assets because of a client confidentiality issue.

He eventually acknowledged that he had worked for the Jackson estate as a consultant analyzing the value of the music catalog. He signed a confidentiality agreement with the estate, which he said prevented him from discussing it.

His company did, however, clear his participation in the wrongful death case with a Jackson estate lawyer before he agreed to be an expert for AEG Live, he said.

Briggs also said AEG Live lawyers were aware of the potential conflict before hiring him and had no problem with it.

Wednesday is the 60th day of testimony in the trial, which began 14 weeks ago in a Los Angeles County court. The judge told jurors she expects testimony to conclude in mid-September.

http://us.cnn.com/2013/07/31/showbiz/jackson-death-trial/index.html?sr=sharebar_twitter

The above is an extremely sensitive issue so for fear of making a mistake let me carefully go over some crucial points.

So Panish discussed with Briggs Michael’s debt and Briggs said he considered the debt to be higher than Michael’s assets. He said he had evaluated the catalog 5-10 times for several companies and therefore produced on the court the impression of a knowledgeable source.

When Michael’s ATV catalogue was raised Ms. Strong suddenly began to make so many objections that the judge “got mad” at her according to the ABC tweets and called a sidebar.

Then Panish asked for whom Briggs evaluated the catalogue and Briggs said he was uncomfortable to name his clients. The judge ordered him to answer and he said he evaluated the catalogue for the following companies:

  •         One law firm that hired him in 2009 after MJ died (the Estate?)

And prior to that also for:

  •         Sony ATV Music Publishing (the owner of the catalog)
  •         Fortress (the company which held the foreclosure note on Neverland and sold it to Tom Barrack and the Colony Capital)
  •         Goldman Sachs (which had a plan to refinance MJ’s debts before Fortress came into the picture. As far as I remember Fortress was brought by Randy Jackson).

Then Briggs said that AEG lawyers didn’t regard his work for those companies and AEG as a conflict of interest.

As to the Estate it looks like Briggs volunteered information about the Estate’s attorney also waiving any conflict of interest here. He said that a certain call took place (he didn’t remember who called) and he spoke with Jeryll Cohen from MJ Estate and she okayed him to testify as a witness in this case.

Brian Panish reacted to all that with a sudden revelation on his part now. He said that the IRS is investigating the people “who hired Briggs” and “for whom he undervalued Sony ATV catalogue” (evidently meaning the Estate who hired him in 2009).

In short all of it became a  big mess and a big sensation. In the meantime I looked up what IRS means:

  • IRS: Internal Revenue Service. The federal agency responsible for administering and enforcing the Treasury Department’s revenue laws, through the assessment and collection of taxes.

So the government tax collection body is checking up on the Estate to see whether the ATV catalog was properly evaluated?  What an unexpected turn to the events …

The ABC tweets give the details of the sensational day:

Tuesday July 30 DAY 59 

  • Hello from the courthouse in downtown LA. Day 59 of Jackson family vs AEG trial has just wrapped up. This is Week 14
  • Eric Briggs was back on the stand. Sabrina Strong finished direct examination.
  • Katherine Jackson was present in court, wearing a black and white jacket with floral details.
  • Before testimony resumed, AEG’s Kathryn Cahan said last week, when Dr. Saunders’ video deposition was played, they didn’t read a correction
  • She said when Dr. Saunders said the only two drugs he know of were Demerol and morphine — it should be buprenorphine instead of Morphine.
  • Strong continued her questioning. Briggs said he was tasked to analyze Erk’s projection related to MJ’s potential work-related income.
  • Briggs Conclusions:
  • 1- It is speculative as to whether these projects would be completed;
  • 2- The projection and numbers are speculative
  • Strong finished her questions. Jacksons’ attorney Brian Panish did cross examination.
  • Briggs said he’s engaged in this matter as AEG and O’Melveny & Myers expert witness.
  • I’m offering my independent opinion in his matter, Briggs said. As an individual, he’s not being paid.
  • Panish asked if his company was being paid, and the expert said FTI consulting is billing fees in this matter.
  • Panish: You are being paid by this side here, sir?
  • Briggs: I don’t agree with your characterization
  • Panish: You never worked for us?
  • Briggs: I’m not performing work in this matter for Mrs. Jackson and Panish law firm
  • I’m engaged in this matter as an expert witness, Briggs responded. “My firm has been hired by AEG and O’Melveny & Myers.”
  • Panish: So you are not independent?
  • Briggs: I’m not sure I understand where you’re going with this.
  • Briggs said he has had between 4 and 6 meeting with AEG’s attorneys over the last two weeks.
  • The expert said he worked 40-50 hours approximately since July 18. He said he went to the attorneys’ office 5 days last week, 2 this week
  • Briggs said another member of his firm (Matthew) is helping him in the case.
  • Matthew has been with the company for about a year and Panish says he’s the one who has been doing a lot of the work.
  • Briggs said Panish’s characterization that Matthew worked the most in this case is concerning.
  • Panish: How much, sir, have you charged O’Melveny & Myers?
  • Briggs said the total bill is in the order of $600,000 to $700,000.
  • Panish: And you say you’re independent, correct, sir?
  • Briggs: I’m offering my independent opinion in this matter

Note:  What Brian Panish means by his questions is that with so much being paid to Briggs and his company for a mere “opinion” in the case it is actually difficult for the witness to remain unbiased. In polite terms it would be called influencing the opinion in favor of AEG, and in impolite terms it could be sheer bribery on their part.

The sum of $700,000 looks to us all the more suspicious when we learn that Briggs does not have any documents to itemize the jobs for which this sum was charged.

And it will make us wonder even more when we read Panish saying that the resulting file from Briggs contains very little information to present to court. He simply brushed away Arthur Erk’s estimation saying that it is “speculation” – simple and easy as that. 

  • Briggs said his understanding is that there’s another person hired by AEG to testify regarding damages in this case.
  • Panish said the expert testified in his deposition he had worked 130 hours in this case.
  • Since his deposition, Briggs said he has worked approximately 200 additional hours, 350 hours total.
  • Panish showed the witness the bill sent by Briggs’ company. It does not detail the work done, only the amount of hours spent.
  • Briggs: Yes, I tell my assistant how much I worked on a case
  • Bill shows 17.3 hours worked, $13,840 charge.
  • Panish: Do you keep track of the hours you work?
  • Briggs said he doesn’t know specifically what he did on those hours, but did research in connection with the case, preparing for deposition.
  • Panish held a three ring binder with about 2 inches of documents and asked Briggs if those were all the documents he generated for $650K.
  • Briggs said that binder does not contain everything that he generated.
  • Panish: Everything contained in this little file is what you generated in this case, correct?
  • Briggs: By your definition, yes
  • Panish said the material Briggs generated is about an inch worth of documents.
  • Briggs said that if Panish is defining in printed paper what he generated, then yes. But if he counted deposition and testimony, then no.
  • Briggs: I did not put together an exhaustive list.
  • Panish: Did you ever make a list of all the depositions you reviewed in this case?
  • Briggs said he read thousands of pages of depositions, probably 10K.
  • Panish asked if Briggs made summaries of the depositions. He said no.
  • I cannot give you an exhaustive list of all the depositions I reviewed in this case, Briggs said. He named about 15/16 people.
  • Briggs said he reviewed the opening statements by both parties, summary judgment and opposition, and the judge’s ruling.
  • Briggs said he has only testified once in UK related to a tax case. He has never testified before in a court in the US.
  • The expert didn’t summarize the trial testimony he read either. He named about 7 people from whom he read testimony.
  • Panish: Did you review Billboard Magazine regarding this case?
  • Briggs: Yes
  • Panish: You never promoted a concert, have you?
  • Briggs: I’m not a concert promoter
  • Briggs also said he has never produced concerts. People in the music industry are his clients, Briggs said.
  • Panish: And the highest selling album in the history of the world is “Thriller,” correct, sir?
  • Briggs: I believe that’s correct. The chart stated it sold 65 million.
  • Panish: You understand the defendants say they are not responsible for anything in this case, right?
  • Briggs: I’m not entirely sure what the defendants said they are responsible for
  • He said he was asked to opine on plaintiff’s damage analysis.
  • I don’t believe the defendants are admitting they owe anything Briggs said.
  • Panish: MJ would earn no money in the future had he not died?
  • Briggs: My opinion is that it is speculative to project that he (MJ) would earn money related to work.
  • Panish: Your opinion, had MJ not died, he would have earned no money, correct?
  • Briggs: That’s not my opinion
  • Panish: How much would he have made working in concerts?
  • Briggs: My opinion is that it is speculative to project earnings for future work
  • Panish: Could he have made money working?
  • Briggs: Sure, anything is possible
  • Briggs: My opinion related to Mr. Erk’s analysis, which has earning capacity in it.
  • Briggs said his understanding is that future earning capacity is what someone is expected to receive for future work.
  • Panish asked if Briggs has ever testified regarding loss of income in wrongful death or personal injury cases. The expert said no.
  • I’ve not done projection of loss of earning capacity, Briggs said.
  • Briggs said he’s worked an average of 50 weeks per year over the past 15 years. Panish calculated it to be about 750 weeks of work.
  • Panish: So you worked on 1300 projects in 750 weeks? [around 1,7 projects per 5 work days, or 1 project per 3 work days]
  • Briggs: Approximately.
  • Panish showed a document Briggs wrote that was basis for opinion on not getting endorsement is debt.
  • Briggs notes: Challenges with major advertisers given history (drug usage, child abuse, litigation, debt); also negative publicity
  • Briggs: MJ history of significant debt figured in my opinion that MJ would encounter challenges in securing endorsements.
  • Panish asked if Briggs considered MJ’s Sony ATV catalogue, which is one of his assets, to offset the debt.
  • Panish: “How do you know he was in debt?”
  • Briggs: There were extensive testimony in this case about MJ’s debt
  • Panish asked if Briggs knows that MJ had assets with value. Briggs said yes.
  • Panish asked if Briggs knows that MJ’s asset, especially one, exceeded the amount of his debt.
  • Briggs said he’s concerned about confidentiality agreement in answering this question.
  • Panish: You know, through your own knowledge, that MJ’s assets far exceeded his debts when you wrote that on the sheet, don’t you sir
  • Judge gets mad with Strong for not stopping the objections, tells her to abide by her rulings. Strong continued, judge called a sidebar.
  • Briggs said he does not know that MJ had assets worth more than 300 or 400 or 500 million when he wrote his opinion .
  • Panish: Did you value that asset (Sony’s catalogue)?
  • Briggs: Yes
  • Briggs said he had knowledge of some of MJ’s asset.
  • Panish: It’s well in excess of $500 million, isn’t it, sir?
  • Briggs: I’m sorry I’m having a trouble here, but I don’t want to disclose any confidential information.
  • Panish asked if the gross value Briggs put for the Sony catalogue is well in excess of the value of MJ’s debt.
  • I don’t remember the number, Briggs said. “I did not believe that’s the case.”
  • Briggs: I believe the testimony the debt associated with Sony ATV catalogue was $400 million.
  • Panish wants to know if the gross value of the catalogue was in excess of the debt. Briggs said no.
  • Briggs said he performed the evaluation of Sony’s catalogue many times, and his response was related to June 2009.
  • Briggs said he was working with someone unrelated to this case regarding the value of the Sony catalogue.
  • Briggs asked the judge to instruct him on what he should answer, since Panish wants to know who he was working with regarding the catalogue.
  • P: Have you been clear about your company to testify?
  • B: Absolutely
  • Panish: Do you have a conflict of interest in this case?
  • Briggs: No
  • Briggs said he’s not comfortable disclosing the names of the companies that hired him before.
  • Judge Yvette Palazuelos ordered him to answer.
  • Briggs: In one particular case, a law firm hired us. It was in late 2009, after Michael Jackson had died.
  • Panish asked if before MJ died if any law firm hired his company to assess MJ’s assets. Briggs said he doesn’t recall.
  • Regarding this asset, the Sony ATV catalogue, Briggs said he worked on evaluating it between 5-10 times.
  • Briggs said he provided his opinion in those engagements, 5 to 10 times, before MJ died, to 3 or 4 third parties.
  • Panish: Was one of them Sony?
  • Briggs: Yes.
  • Sony ATV Music Publishing was one of the companies, not Sony music, Briggs said. 
  • Fortress Capital – Briggs said it was another company. He recalls law firm and there may have been financial companies.
  • Panish: Goldman Sachs?
  • Briggs: It’s possible, I work on hundreds of projects a year.
  • Panish: Goldman Sachs hired you regarding MJ, right sir?
  • Briggs: I don’t recall specifically. 
  • Briggs said he watched the testimony of Meglen in the overflow room. He was accompanied by 3 AEG attorneys.
  • Panish asked if Briggs worked with MJ before being retained in this case. He said yes and that he discussed it with AEG.
  • Briggs testified AEG didn’t see the work done in previous engagements as conflict of interest.
  • Briggs said that what was more important to him is what FTI’s general counsel thought and they determined there was no conflict of interest.
  • Briggs said he had engagement agreements with a number of entities related to MJ.
  • I went one step further and told them (AEG) I would not be discussing anything regarding my other work, Briggs said.
  • Panish: Who did you call, have sign waiver in writing about a potential conflict of interest?
  • Briggs said there wasn’t anything in writing. 
  • My recollection was the attorneys for the Estate of Michael Jackson, Briggs testified. He said a call took place, doesn’t know who called.
  • Briggs was retained on February 8, 2013. He spoke with Jeryll Cohen from MJ Estate and she okay’d him to testify as witness in this case.
  • She was well aware what was going on and approved it. Briggs said he told her he had no interest in sharing the work done for the Estate.
  • Briggs said he spoke with Cohen again about two months ago, and she acknowledged his work on this case.
  • Briggs receives a salary and bonus based on performance of the division.
  • FTI is a public traded company. Briggs said he thinks the company was approaching $2 billion in revenues last year.
  • Briggs testified he saw testimony that MJ had one life week to live after June 25, 2009, the day of the artist’s death.
  • Panish said Dr. Shimelman testified MJ’s life expectancy was one week based on Dr. Murray’s treatment of him.
  • Briggs: I believe his statement was MJ’s life expectancy was one week, and he was taking into effect a lot of things: Dr. Murray, drug use
  • Panish: Are you aware that IRS is investigating the people who hired you and undervalued Sony ATV catalogue?
  • Objection: Sustained. 
  • Panish: Dr. Murray was a big risk to MJ’s health, wasn’t he?
  • Dr. Earley said MJ was essentially playing Russian roulette in the way he was using drugs, Briggs said.

NOTE: Panish is talking to Briggs about Murray being a risk. This fact cannot be even disputed as Murray was found guilty and put in jail for his criminal negligence.

However Briggs twists the question and answers that it was Michael who risked his life by using this drug. This answer makes all the difference in the world as it deliberately shifts the focus from one thing to another.

Briggs actually took off the guilt from the doctor who was responsible for administering propofol and breaking his Hippocratic oath, and placed it on the patient who trusted his doctor and put himself in his hands.

The logic is the same as in the case when you invited a professional pyrotechnic to your garden to arrange fireworks for your guests and he burned down your house due to his gross negligence –  and now everyone accuses you of this crime though it was actually he who did it. Of course you are to blame, you shouldn’t have invited him, but on the other hand how could you know?

No, it isn’t the owner of the house or even the fireworks which are to really blame for the fire. It is the man who did it all and convinced you that making it on the roof is perfectly safe and the best solution possible. Your only fault is that you were too naïve to believe his stories and think that you are safe under his expert guidance.

So if anyone was playing a death game with Michael’s life it was Murray. He didn’t have any monitoring equipment or measuring devices and didn’t know a thing about the effect of the drug and the way to administer it. Michael was sure that he was in competent hands and was told (evidently by Murray) that propofol was safe if his condition was monitored.

However Briggs turns it into a big and catchy story about Michael “playing the Russian roulette by using the drug”. But Michael wasn’t using the drug – he was given it by a doctor. And when Dr. Shimelman said that Michael had only one week to live in Murray’s hands he was talking only of the doctor and not Michael or even propofol.

I don’t remember Dr. Shimelman to testify at all at this trial, but if he did and said that Michael could die any night under Murray’s supervision he was absolutely right.

In fact with total lack of monitoring equipment Michael could have died the first time Murray administered propofol because Murray was adjusting the dripping manually. For propofol this method is out of the question as each extra drop can stop the patient’s breathing in no time.

By the way though everyone calls some deadly risk a Russian roulette we actually never play it. Probably someone did it centuries ago but now even the darest of us would not risk it.

  • Panish asked if Dr. Murray was a risk to MJ’s health.
  • Briggs: I wasn’t focused on the risk, I was focused on a doctor assessing a record after the fact.
  • Panish: If Dr. Murray isn’t in the question, there’s no risk, right, sir?
  • Briggs: It appears in determining his life expectancy Dr. Shimelman took in consideration Dr. Murray.
  • Briggs: There are all kinds of risks, like risk of relapse, risk of the manner he’s taking the drugs.
  • Briggs: This is not my opinion, I’m not a doctor, I was relying on Dr. Shimelman’s testimony (about one week to live).
  • Briggs: Dr. Earley said the way MJ was taking drugs was like playing Russian roulette.
  • Briggs’ note says Dr. Shimelman — Die any night
  • Briggs: That’s what I recall from the testimony.
  • Panish: Isn’t it true Dr. Earley never blamed MJ for his addiction?
  • Briggs: I was asked to assess forecast earnings, not blame.
  • Briggs: To a lay person, Dr. Earley’s testimony that MJ was playing Russian roulette is talking about life expectancy.
  • Panish said Dr. Earley wasn’t asked to opined on MJ’s life expectancy. Briggs read Dr. Earley’s deposition and that’s what it reads.
  • Briggs: Just to be clear, I can’t assess anyone’s life expectancy.
  • Briggs said he relied on AEG’s attorney to give him all the relevant materials related to what he’s been asked to opine.
  • The expert said he didn’t review MJ’s autopsy report, since he has no ability to read it.
  • Briggs said one of the experts he reviewed stated the normal actuary doesn’t apply to MJ’s life and behavior.
  • Briggs relied on Dr. Earley’s testimony. He was unable to give a life expectancy to MJ because he wasn’t hired for that.
  • Dr. Shimelman said if Dr. Murray remained in the picture, MJ would live only another week.
  • Dr. Schnoll said MJ could’ve been treated by a fit and competent doctor and remove the risk.
  • Briggs: Dr. Shimelman stated a life expectancy of one week, I don’t know how someone could perform for 9 months.
  • Panish: AEG thought MJ could do 50 shows, didn’t they, sir?
  • Briggs: AEG had a plan for 50 shows, they had a budget for 50 shows, they were interested in doing 50 shows.

NOTE: This is another sample of Briggs’ twisted logic and evasive vocabulary – AEG not only planned and thought that Michael could do 50 shows, but they actually sold tickets for 50 shows and without asking Michael’s proper consent too. So feigning surprise about these 50 shows now is ridiculous. All questions should go to AEG please.

  • Panish asked who was more knowledgeable in concerts, if Briggs or Paul Gongaware. Briggs responded it depends which aspect of the business.
  • Brigss: AEG did not hire me before February of this year.
  • Panish: Did AEG ever hire you to see if the show would happen or not?
  • Panish: Was AEG fraudulently selling tickets for the shows?
  • Briggs: I can’t opine on that, I’m not an expert in fraud.
  • Briggs: If I were hired, I’d have told my opinion that it’s speculative that the 9 months would have been completed.
  • It appeared they (AEG) believed the shows would’ve gone forward, Briggs testified.
  • Panish asked if AEG only hired him 3 and half years after MJ was dead. Briggs said yes.
  • Panish: Live Nation hired you to assess concert and feasibility?
  • Briggs: No
  • Judge then adjourned trial until 9:45 am PT tomorrow. Attorneys ordered at 9:30 am to discuss trial issues with the judge.
  • Next potential witnesses: Randy Jackson (via video depo), Michael La Perruque (MJ’s former head of security), Debbie Rowe, Rebbie Jackson
  • For all the latest, watch our newscasts @ABC7Courts or http://www.abc7.com . We hope to see you tomorrow for full trial coverage!

NOTE: As regards fraud in selling tickets I think that Panish refers to AEG’s deal with Viagogo which presents itself as a secondary ticket broker where individual fans can resell tickets to each other.

In reality it isn’t the secondary market but a primary venue for the promoter to sell their premium tickets at inflated prices. Most of the profit goes to the promoter while Viagogo gets a certain percentage for their services.

This is standard Viagogo practice revealed by a British Channel 4 sensational documentary shown in 2012:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/feb/23/dispatches-to-screen-viagogo-investigation?newsfeed=true 

WEDNESDAY  JULY 31, 2013. DAY 60

.

The third day of Briggs’ testimony brought some clarification to the mess with the Estate and the ATV/Sony catalogue.

Now we learn that Briggs never discussed any conflict of interest with Ms. Cohen of the Estate, so consequently she could never waive it – he simply never asked her opinion about it.

If you compare it with what that article about Briggs said (“he gained permission from the Jackson estate lawyer Jeryll Cohen to waive any potential conflict of interest”) you will see that someone is telling a big lie here, and I am not even sure that it is the media this time, but most probably a certain AEG expert testifying under oath now.

On Wednesday Panish ripped into shreds anything that still remained of Briggs. Panish methodically went over several issues, including the following:

-        Briggs’ employees just fresh from school charge $350 per hour and Briggs doesn’t even know what job they did for the project.

-        Gongaware planned to arrange 186 shows for Michael and was supposed to make for him $1,1 billion at the average price of $108 per ticket even according to AEG’s own estimation.

-        The tour of U2 grossed a big sum however Michael’s tickets for the History tour cost $37 only and made one third of the ticket for U2 shows, so for any comparisons to be accurate the profit the History tour should have been three times as much as the one actually collected.

-        Arthur Erk’s projection for several years of Michael future earnings was no speculation because AEG had a tour with Michael for three years (until 2012).

-        The coroner’s report did not state a single reason that could have reduced Michael’s life expectancy, however Briggs says he did not read it, though MJ’s life expectancy was central to his testimony.

-        Briggs read Tom Barrack’s deposition, but did not notice him saying that Michael could earn $500 a year if he put his head to it.

-        All performers cancel their concerts, however Briggs made his judgment of MJ’s cancellation rate without comparing it with anyone else, and now he admits that he doesn’t know the figures.

-        Briggs said that he was taking his information from the Internet and agreed that every 6th grader can do the same.

In short the cross-examination was so much bloodshed that at some point I even felt sorry for poor Briggs. Panish was relentless.

Wednesday July 31 DAY 60

  • Hello from the courthouse in downtown LA. Day 60 of Jackson family vs AEG trial to get underway soon.
  • Attorneys and judge are discussing future testimony and what will be and won’t be allowed to come in.
  • Defendants’ retained expert witness, Eric Briggs, will resume cross examination once trial begins today.
  • Rebbie Jackson is also expected to testify this week, but she’s sick. Randy Jackson will testify via video deposition.
  • Also coming soon to the stand is Debbie Rowe, the biological mother of two of MJ’s children and a nurse who treated the artist.
  • We’ll bring you all the details of today’s testimony as soon as we can. Remember, judge does not allow live tweet.
  • Eric Briggs was back on the stand. Brian Panish did cross examination. Katherine Jackson was present in white jacket with green leaves.
  • Panish asked Briggs who he contacted at the Estate of Michael Jackson to waive potential conflict of interest.
  • I believe FTI checked for conflict of interest, Briggs said. He said he received a form and the conflict of interest check was marked.
  • The expert said he doesn’t know who made the call to the Estate, if it was him or his partner.
  • Briggs: As far as I’m concerned, everything I’ve done for Estate and everything I’ve done on this matter have nothing to do with each other.
  • Panish: Sir, did you testify you discussed the potential for a conflict of interest with AEG’s attorneys?
  • Briggs: I never viewed it as a potential conflict of interest, I don’t think I characterized it that way. 
  • I discussed my previous engagements with O’Melveny & Myers, Briggs said.
  • Panish asked which lawyers Briggs discussed at OMM the potential for conflict of interest. He said Sabrina Strong and perhaps Jessica Bina.
  • Briggs met with AEG’s lawyers for about 15-20 minutes yesterday and another 15-20 minutes this morning.
  • Panish: Yesterday, you said you met with Ms. Cohen (attorney for the Estate), correct?
  • Briggs: Yes
  • Panish: Did Ms. Cohen say to you she waived any potential conflict between you, FTI, and the Estate of Michael Jackson?
  • Briggs: Ms. Cohen did not say that 
  • Panish asked if Briggs called Ms. Cohen to talk about the potential conflict of interest before his deposition. He said he doesn’t recall
  • Panish: Did you ask Ms. Cohen to waive any potential conflict of interest?
  • Briggs: I did not ask her that specific question 
  • Panish asked Briggs if he’s produced his time records related to this case. He said he turned the subpoena to FTI’s general counsel.
  • Panish: Has any attorneys for AEG told you that the court issued an order to you to produce your time records forthwith (immediately?
  • Briggs: No, my recollection is that the document was a subpoena.
  • Panish tells Briggs there’s a signed order to produce his time record in this case. Briggs asked to see it, since he doesn’t have it.
  • Panish showed several bills from FTI for Briggs without itemization of the work done. They are for $55,000, $189,000, $123,000, $155,902.
  • Panish points out there are two employees just out of school earning $350/hr. He asked where their time sheets were.
  • You’d expect someone working for that kind of money would produce records of what they worked on Panish asked. Briggs said he doesn’t know.
  • Panish: Does your company check the time worked before submitting bill to a client?
  • Briggs: I understand there’s a check system in place, but I don’t know how it works.
  • Panish asked if Briggs’ company has a billing department and itemization of work done. He said yes to first, doesn’t know the second.
  • Panish questioned Briggs, extensively, about all the bills FTI submitted and if he knew the specific work performed for each bill.
  • “My opinion is that it’s speculative he would earn any money working”, Briggs opined.
  • Panish: Your opinion is that MJ wouldn’t earn a dime for future work?
  • Briggs: Yes, taking the consideration the risk factors we know today
  • Briggs: MJ’s ability to secure endorsements from financial companies would be impacted by negative headlines associated with his debts
  • Panish asked if Pepsi, Nike, Red Bull, soft drink companies are financial companies. Briggs said no.
  • Briggs said that in matters he bills clients by the hour, he’s always charged $800 per hour. Other possibility is to charge flat fee.
  • The expert clarified that he probably didn’t charge $800/hour in the beginning of his career.
  • Panish asked Briggs if he was aware of anything that AEG did specifically to assess MJ’s health.
  • In his deposition, Briggs said he does not know anything specifically that AEG did to assess MJ’s health.
  • Panish asked if Briggs included merchandising revenue in the chart he made. Briggs said Erk testified the numbers included merchandising.
  • Briggs conceded he doesn’t know independently whether the merchandising revenue is included in the numbers.
  • I was absolutely comparing apples to apples, Briggs said.
  • Panish asked if U2 360 had 97,000 people at the Rose Bowl. Briggs said U2 was a 360 degree and they were able to fit a record crowd.
  • Panish inquired about Meglen’s testimony saying 97,000 people was not true. Briggs said he doesn’t think that’s what Meglen testified.
  • Chart:
  • 1- U2 360 in 2009 — 110 shows, $101, average 66K people
  • 2- Rolling Stones — 144 shows, $119, average 32K people
  • 3- AC/DC — 167 shows, $91, average 29K people
  • 4- Madonna — 85 shows, $115, average 42K people
  • MJ’s HIStory tour averaged 55K people, average ticket was $37, which is one third of U2′s ticket price.
  • The last MJ show was about 10-12 years prior to U2. U2 averaged 66K people.
  • Panish did this calculation: 55k (average of MJ’s audience) x 186 shows (Gongaware’s plan) x $108 (average TII ticket) = $1.1. billion
  • Panish: $108 ticket price times 55 thousand people times 186 shows, how does that come out sir?
  • Briggs: That is roughly $1.1 billion
  • Panish asked if there were drug use allegations regarding The Rolling Stones and AC/DC members.
  • Briggs said yes, there were headlines about it. Panish asked if it was the same headlines Briggs referred to about Michael Jackson.
  • Briggs said MJ’s drug use he analyzed was based on testimony in this trial, not tabloid headlines.
  • Briggs: Yes, I think AEG wanted to go on a worldwide tour with Michael Jackson.
  • Panish: How many concerts did Gongaware estimated to do?
  • Briggs: In Sept 2008, prior to an agreement with MJ?
  • Panish: Yes
  • Briggs: 186. 
  • Panish inquired if Dr. Shimelman testified that without Conrad Murray MJ would have had a normal life expectancy.
  • Briggs: What he said is that he was not able to offer a statement with the doctor out of the picture and that is significant.
  • Panish asked if Dr. Earley said MJ should not be to blame for his addiction. Briggs said yes, but said addicts should take responsibility
  • Briggs agreed that AEG entered into a 3 year contract with Michael Jackson.
  • There was wide spread media coverage, over the years, of MJ’s drug usage, Briggs said.
  • Panish: You’d expect AEG, someone in the business, to know about MJ’s drug use
  • Briggs: I’d generally expect they’d be aware of the headlines
  • Panish compared Briggs to an armchair quarterback after the fact, issuing opinion after the fact.
  • Briggs: My opinion, of course, is more informed than the one made at the time
  • Panish: Did you know AEG paid a medical doctor to exam Michael Jackson, yes or no?
  • Briggs: No
  • Panish: Did you know AEG paid money to have Dr. Slavit to check Michael Jackson?
  • Briggs: I didn’t have that specific knowledge
  • There was a physical on MJ in the beginning of 2009, Briggs said. He added he doesn’t know who hired the doctor and who paid him.
  • Briggs said he recall reading about MJ getting a physical and that everything was fine.
  • Briggs: My information is that the physical was passed and that there were no significant issues.
  • Panish: In your opinion that MJ wouldn’t complete 50 shows, you didn’t consider Dr Slavit?
  • Briggs: I don’t know if I reviewed it prior to depo
  • Panish: Were you aware coroner said MJ didn’t have any medical problem at the time of his death that would’ve his life expectancy reduced?
  • Briggs: I don’t recall that specific testimony, my knowledge is that the coroner’s report was introduced through doctor testimony.
  • My opinion is based after the facts, what we know today, Briggs testified.
  • Panish asked how many Dangerous shows were canceled. Briggs said in his opinion is between 3 to 10. He said he did research about it.
  • Panish wanted to know why Briggs didn’t bring the documents he relied on regarding the cancelation of the Dangerous tour.
  • Panish asked the judge to admonish Briggs to answer the questions several times throughout the morning.
  • When attorney asked the judge again, judge said: “I keep advising him, but…”
  • Panish: How old were you in 1993?
  • Briggs: About 17-18
  • Panish asked how many shows MJ performed in his career. Briggs said he doesn’t know for sure, thinks it’s 270 approximately.
  • Briggs said he cannot tell Panish what each specific bill means in terms of itemization of work done.
  • Panish asked if there’s any document detailing the time spent on the task and who did what regarding this case.
  • Briggs: To my knowledge, that information does not exist.
  • Panish wanted to know what type of time calculation software FTI uses. Briggs said he doesn’t know.
  • Briggs testified he doesn’t know if his company has been paid or not.
  • Briggs said in terms of actual dates, approximately 1.4% of the Dangerous shows were canceled.
  • Briggs reviewed Tom Barrack’s testimony. Panish asked if Barrack said if MJ wanted to, he could earn $500 million a year. Briggs said no.
  • Barrack runs Colony Capital, an investment company. It’s a multi-billion dollar entity.
  • Panish showed deposition of Barrack with interview saying MJ was a guy who could make $500 million a year if he put his head to it.
  • Panish: Barrack wanted to invest in Mr. Jackson and do work with him in the future, right, sir?
  • Briggs: Yes

NOTE: Finally some clarification arrived as regards the estimation done by Briggs of the ATV/Sony catalogue.

We learn that that the Government (IRS) checked up the value of the catalogue and informed the Estate that its value was twice as high as they stated.

After that the Estate evidently approached Briggs for explanations because it was Briggs who had done the evaluation soon after Michael’s death. And now that Panish is asking Briggs about the same he says it is confidential information and all those in court argue whether he can talk about it or not.

It must have been so heated a discussion that the judge even had to excuse herself to the jury saying that these arguments is what they usually do in the chambers and now they know what it’s like.

  • Panish: Government has stated one MJ asset is worth twice his debt, isn’t it, sir?
  • Briggs: The only information I have in that respect is from attorneys of the Estate of Michael Jackson and I’m concerned with confidentiality
  • Panish: You are well aware the value of one asset is doubled any debt he had, isn’t that, sir?
  • Briggs: The only information I received in this regard came from lawyers of the Estate of Michael Jackson.
  • Briggs: They hired us to perform work related to Sony ATV catalogue as of the date of MJ’s death.
  • Panish argues there’s no attorney-client privilege,and Briggs should be ordered to answer.
  • Briggs said he only learned about what he knows of what the government claims regarding Sony ATV catalogue from the Estate. 
  • Judge and attorneys extensively argued whether Briggs has attorney-client privilege with the Estate of Michael Jackson.
  • Judge to the jurors: Now you know what we do in chambers. That’s the stuff we argue about.
  • Panish asked if MJ paid for Katherine Jackson’s bills and expenses. Briggs said he doesn’t recall the specific comments.
  • Panish asked if MJ bought his mother a $500,000 motorhome. Briggs said he doesn’t recall.
  • Panish wanted to know if Briggs reviewed all the relevant documents in this case. He said the attorneys gave him documents, he asked others
  • Briggs identified 3 primary risks:
  • - Health/medical experts
  • - Projects falling through/cancellations
  • - Industry/precedent
  • Panish asked where Dr. Murray was in the risk. Briggs said he did not take Dr. Murray into account.
  • Panish: What’s Madonna’s cancellation rate?
  • Briggs: I don’t know
  • Panish mentioned U2 canceled shows for Bono’s back surgery, Madonna canceled show to be with her family, Guns N’Roses canceled and returned.
  • Panish asked about Eric Clapton and Van Halen’s cancellation of shows. Briggs doesn’t recall how many were canceled.
  • Panish said Briggs got his information from articles out of the internet.
  • Panish: All of these information, someone in 6th grade would be able to get the same exact information off the internet, correct, sir?
  • Briggs: They may have the same information but the interpretation is absolutely different.
  • Panish: Are you saying all these people are risks and no one should do business with them?
  • Briggs: I didn’t say that
  • Panish asked how many shows AEG does in a year. Briggs said he doesn’t know.
  • Briggs estimated hundreds, perhaps thousands shows happen in a year around the world.
  • Panish: Did you take in consideration Randy Phillips and Dr. Murray had shared responsibility to get MJ into rehearsal? Briggs didn’t recall
  • Panish showed email saying Phillips and Dr. Murray were responsible for getting MJ to rehearsal. Briggs said he doesn’t recall it.
  • Briggs said that sometimes his clients don’t follow their advice. “Our advice is not always right,” the expert said.
  • The truth of my opinion has nothing to do with how much we’re being paid in this case, Briggs testified.
  • Panish asked what specific work Matthew did. Briggs said he researched cities Erk said concerts would take place, audience capacity, arenas
  • In deposition, an attorney asked Briggs if he performed specific calculation to demand in India for a MJ show in 2009-2012.
  • Briggs said he did not nor was he aware of any material to enable them to make projections about India.
  • Panish: Could Mr. Jackson make movies?
  • Briggs: Yes
  • Panish: Do you agree Mj could have toured?
  • Briggs: Had he lived, it’s possible
  • Panish: Could he have acted in movies?
  • Briggs: It’s possible, sure
  • Panish: How much actors get paid for good movies?
  • Briggs: It vary from a few million to many millions of dollars
  • Panish: MJ could have made records?
  • Briggs: Yes, it’s possible
  • Panish: Could he have been involved in movies?
  • Briggs: Yes, it’s possible
  • Panish: Could he have done tours?
  • Briggs: Yes, it’s possible
  • Panish: Could he have gotten endorsements?
  • Briggs: Yes, it’s possible
  • Panish: Could he have sold merchandise?
  • Briggs: To the extent the shows happened, it’s possible
  • Panish: Could he have done a residency shows in Las Vegas?
  • Briggs: It’s possible
  • Panish: Did you look into MJ having a residency show with Celine Dion?
  • Briggs: I’m not aware of that
  • Katherine Jackson stated that Michael Jackson didn’t want to be moonwalking at 50 years old, Briggs said.
  • Panish: Did Ortega testify he discussed with MJ going on a worldwide tour and going to India?
  • Briggs: I don’t recall that in trial testimony
  • Panish asked if Ortega testified that he wanted to do films with MJ and wanted to be involved in anything Jackson related. Briggs said yes.
  • Panish inquired if Taj Jackson also testified about MJ wanting to do movies. Briggs answered yes.
  • Panish asked about album “Thriller 25″ released in 2006 or 2007. Briggs said he concentrated on MJ’s brand new albums in his chart.
  • I would describe it (Thriller 25) as successful re-release, Briggs said.
  • Panish asked how many people “Q” score company surveys. Briggs said he thinks they measure about 1800 people. Panish said it’s 1400.
  • Briggs said the “Q” scores measure people in the US. Panish asked if it were measured around the world. Briggs said there wasn’t available.
  • Panish: All you have is 1800 people surveyed across the United States?
  • Briggs: That’s correct
  • The Q” score was not relevant to ticket sales” Briggs said. Panish asked how the ticket sales went in London. Briggs responded “very well”
  • Panish: Mr. Gongaware had no concern that Mr. Jackson could do 50 shows, correct?
  • Briggs: With the information he had, it appeared that way
  • Outside the presence of the jury, attorneys and judge discussed about what Briggs recalls regarding Gongaware’s testimony.
  • Judge: It seems like he doesn’t recall, or doesn’t want to recall, the testimony.

NOTE: By now we more or less begin to understand what is happening between Briggs, the Estate and AEG.

First of all Panish said that the Estate had not given Briggs a permission to testify in this case. So evidently the Estate lawyers do see his testimony as a conflict of interest.

Then we learn that Briggs undervalued the ATV/Sony catalogue – both in 2009 and consequently in all other cases when various parties approached him. He undervalued it when Fortress Capital asked for an estimation, when Sony/ATV Music Publishing themselves asked for it and when most probably Tom Barrack was evaluating it too.

Now we learn that the actual value of the catalogue is twice as high (according to government estimation) and is consequently much higher than Michael’s debt. This means that Michael was totally misguided in his understanding of his own finances and was put under too much unnecessary financial pressure. Panish said Michael could have gone on spending money for another 30 years and still have money to his credit.

With all these revelations the situation has turned into a complete mess.

  • Briggs doesn’t know whether he is subpoenaed by the IRS as up till now he got information only from the Estate.
  • The IRS is now in discussions with the Estate but no one can say what kind of investigation is going on (Putnam says they can’t ask).
  • And no one knows whether there is a conflict of interest in Briggs’ testifying for AEG but simultaneously having access to information about the catalogue and having done a job for the Estate. The judge wants a representative of the Estate to come and say whether they waived the conflict of interest or whether they didn’t.
  • And for the dessert of it Briggs says that Branca did not say anything positive about Michael’s ability to make money, however then he clarifies his point by saying that he never asked about it because “the positives were apparent to him” and “he knew them very well” anyway.

Briggs is to go on with this testimony on Thursday too so the mess, fun and thrill of it will evidently continue.

ABC tweets say about it:

  • Panish: The IRS has called into question what this witness is trying to say. The Estate never gave witness waiver to testify in this case.
  • Panish: He never had permission, never had waiver. I believe the true facts will show he didn’t contact Ms. Cohen until after his deposition
  • Panish: There’s no privilege regarding the value of ATV catalogue being double the amount of MJ’s debts.
  • Panish: His credibility is seriously at issue here, there’s no privilege whatsoever 
  • Bina: Briggs said he believes debt aspect would make MJ not appealable to endorsements.
  • Bina: Ackerman has analyzed in great detail MJ’s spending, debt. She said her understanding that conflict of interest has been waived.
  • Bina: The government and his company may have a different understanding as to the catalogue value.
  • Judge: What kind of investigation is that?
  • Putnam: We don’t know, we can’t ask.
  • Bina: There’s no conflict of interest. Besides that, Erk didn’t consider the ATV catalogue value and debts.
  • Panish: They want to show he was destitute and had not money. That’s not true, he could’ve spent money for 30 years and still not be in debt.
  • Bina: He cleared the engagement for work on this case, not the debt.
  • Judge: It sounds pretty suspicious to me.
  • Bina: It doesn’t matter whether MJ was in debt (for endorsement), but the negative perception he was in debt was sufficient.
  • Boyle: He said that the value of the ATV catalogue was less than the debt. And that’s not true. He knows it’s not true.
  • Boyle: According to the IRS, it’s much higher than the debt.
  • Judge: I don’t understand him claiming privilege as to what the IRS says the value of the catalogue is 
  • Panish asked if Briggs has done extensive work regarding the value of Sony ATV catalogue.
  • Briggs said yes, for Goldman Sachs; Sony ATV, not corporate; Fortress Capital; Estate of MJ; Law firm in 2007.
  • Briggs said it’s all in connection with the evaluation of Sony ATV catalogue. The expert said he gets rehired some times.
  • Briggs has given valuation opinions in writing, which is easily accessible. 
  • Briggs: The work was performed after MJ’s death, but the valuation is of date of death.
  • Panish: You don’t consider IRS putting into question your work a major problem?
  • Briggs: IRS review about valuation is very commonplace, specially in large estates.
  • Judge: It sounds like you have info not subject to privilege, with other companies that ordered the valuation.
  • Panish: He put a very low value on the catalogue and said it is less than MJ’s debts, when the IRS valued it twice.
  • Panish said the value ranges from a billion to 8 billion dollars. He knows the IRS has given much higher value, the attorney argued.
  • Perry Sanders: the other side could stipulate there’s another valuation that says the Sony catalogue is almost 2 times the debt.
  • Bina: The problem is that we don’t know the answer, we don’t know that to be true.
  • Panish asked if Briggs has been subpoenaed by IRS. He said he’s not aware.
  • Briggs: I understand the IRS is in discussions with the Estate.
  • Judge said to get the Estate lawyer in court to see if there’s a waiver.
  • Panish: If Briggs said something that’s not true, it goes against his credibility.
  • Bina said MJ’ business manager said MJ had no ability to borrow money and had no money at time of death.
  • Panish: That’s not true! He didn’t know how much catalogue was worth, had $6 million in an account that Tohme was holding, so he had money.
  • Jury then entered the courtroom. Testimony resumed.
  • Panish asked Briggs if he knows the average ticket price for MJ’s show was $108. He said it’s approximately right.
  • John Branca is a prominent entertainment attorney. Briggs said he was brought back around the time MJ died.
  • Briggs doesn’t recall Branca saying he believes MJ could have done the 50 shows.
  • Panish: All you remember is the things that were against MJ?
  • Briggs: My opinion is not against MJ.
  • Panish asked if Briggs noted anything positive that Branca said regarding MJ’s ability to make money. He said he doesn’t believe he did.
  • Briggs: The positive I knew quite well, so there’s no notes to that, the positives were apparent.
  • Briggs said the points in his outline is to support his opinion, since the positive things he already knew about.
  • Briggs said he reviewed Shawn Trell’s trial testimony of 4 days but does not recall anything he said that was relevant to his opinion.
  • Briggs said the figures below are for ticket sales and merchandising:
  • Prod 1 — $94 million
  • Prod 2 — $107 million
  • Briggs said there’s a non-appearance insurance on the budget. Lloyds of London charged $450,000 for the premium.
  • Panish: How much did the pay out was?
  • Briggs: I have no idea
  • Court adjourned until tomorrow at 10 am PT. Attorneys ordered at 9:45 am PT to discuss conflict of interest.
  • Next witnesses:
  • Eric Briggs
  • MJ’s estate attorney Howard Weitzman to appear as well.
  • Barry Seagal (MJ financial advisor to talk about his spending)
  • Michael La Perruque (former head of MJ’s security)
  • For all the latest watch @ABC7 and http://www.abc7.com . We hope to see you tomorrow for complete coverage. Have a great night everyone!

Filed under: AEG THE HORRIBLE, Jacksons vs. AEG Tagged: AEG, Eric Briggs, John Meglen, Michael Jackson

MICHAEL JACKSON, CHRISTIAN AUDIGIER, TOHME TOHME or the stories some photos can tell

$
0
0

May 22, 2008 michael-jackson-christian-audigierIt started with the pictures of Michael Jackson’s at Christian Audigier’s birthday party – Michael looked so gorgeous there and the pictures were so lucky a find that I could not resist checking up who Christian Audigier is and why Michael attended his birthday party on May 22, 2008 at all.

This led to researching some articles and looking at some more pictures of Michael in the last year of his life, and all of it brought a somewhat surprising and truly unexpected result.

CHRISTIAN AUDIGIER’S CLOTHING LINE FOR MICHAEL JACKSON

Wiki says that Christian Audigier is worth $250mln and is a French designer and entrepreneur living in the US. Though sounding nice this is not what I wanted to know about Audigier – I hoped to learn that he was a real friend to Michael Jackson but unfortunately found that he was not.  Audigier is simply another of those enterprising people who wanted to use his fame for their own promotion.

At that birthday party of his on May 22, 2008 in a Las Vegas casino Audigier was most probably testing Michael’s ‘likeability’ and selling power for a new brand of clothing and accessories he was planning to start with the help of Michael and his ideas.

May 22, 2008 MJ attends Christian Audigier's birthday party. Testing Michael's likeability

May 22, 2008 MJ attends Christian Audigier’s birthday party. Testing Michael’s likeability

Michael’s likeability proved to be absolutely smashing. Audigier’s VIP guests went crazy upon Michael’s arrival and yelled like teenagers at hearing Michael’s music and seeing him in person. Even if you don’t know French you can still feel the suspense of all that waiting for his arrival and the joy and genuine feeling of happiness that swept the audience when they finally saw Michael:

In his greeting speech Michael addressed Christian Audigier with words of appreciation for Audigier as an artist and as a human being. At that moment I didn’t know much about Audigier and so high Michael’s opinion of his friend and of his human qualities produced a big impression on me. Michael said:

  • “I’d like to say…I’d like to say, it’s wonderful to be here for Christian, his family and all you beautiful people. And to celebrate his 50th birthday. God bless you man. And um…in my opinion…in my opinion, not only you are a wonderful artist, you are a wonderful human being. And the King Of Fashion!”

It was also a big surprise to see that one of the guests at the party was Peter Lopez – a lawyer of exceptionally high repute and great integrity who wished Michael only good, so a mere fact that Lopez was in the company of Christian Audigier warmed me up to this man even more, especially since it looked like Lopez and Audigier were offering Michael some alternative projects different from those of Tohme, Barrack and AEG.

And indeed soon after that May 2008 party newspapers reported that Audigier and Michael Jackson were working on creating a new brand – a Michael Jackson clothing line. The news came only two weeks later, on June 12, 2008:

Michael Jackson And Christian Audigier To Collaborate

June 12, 2008 by: Bridget Daly

Michael Jackson is reportedly striking up a deal with fashion designer Christian Audigier.  MJ is working with the Ed Hardy designer on the very first stages of a clothing line.  The two are hoping it gets really big, and Michael is dedicating a lot of his time to the design of the clothes.

Well as long as he’s spending as much time in the studio, it’s fine with us! Could the two be designing wardrobe for Michael’s upcoming tour when the album is released? We’ll keep you updated!

http://www.modamob.com/christian-audigier/michael-jackson-and-christian-audigier-collaborate.html

Later Christian Audigier explained how his cooperation with Michael Jackson started:

Ed Hardy Designer Christian Audigier Talks Jon Gosselin, Michael Jackson

by Gina Serpe, Cristina Gibson and Claudia RosenbaumWed., Aug. 19, 2009 10:41 AM PDT

Ed Hardy designer Christian Audigier knew Michael Jackson. He partied with Michael Jackson. And Jon Gosselin is no Michael Jackson.

At least not when it comes to people he had plans to collaborate with on potential clothing lines.

Despite reports to the contrary, spurred on by an Audigier-funded trip to St.-Tropez for Gosselin and girlfriend Hailey Glassman, the T-shirt purveyor tells E! News that the only celebrity he ever discussed going into business with was the King of Pop.

“I invited him to my birthday,” Audigier says of Jackson. “And he showed up. It was his last public appearance. He was testing [the public mood about him] at my party. So we became friends. He told me one day he would like to collaborate with me on a collection.”

A binding contract if ever there was one. Too bad no such deal ever existed with The Lying Channel’s No. 1 dad.

“I never said I was going to do a line with Jon Gosselin. I don’t want to do a line with Jon Gosselin.”

Well, not this week, anyway…

http://uk.eonline.com/news/140097/ed-hardy-designer-christian-audigier-talks-jon-gosselin-michael-jackson

Feb.7, 2009 michael-and-christian-audigier-do-some-shopping-at-dior-and-dolce-gabbana-at-rodeo-drive 3

The correct date for the visit to Dolce & Gabbana is most probably February 7, 2009. Peter Lopez is accompanying Michael and Audigier

The next time Audigier appeared in public together with Michael was on February 7 [27?], 2009 in California when both of them visited a Dolce & Gabbana shop. Surprisingly, Peter Lopez was accompanying them again.

Peter Lopez’s presence there meant to me that as Michael’s lawyer he was seriously looking into the business side of the future project, and that Michael’s visit there was not a mere shopping visit but was one more step in taking their project further.

For a mere shopping occasion Michael did not need a lawyer, so it had to involve some business connected with designing fashion clothes or researching the market. Peter Lopez was probably there to offer Michael his legal and other professional advice:

However the photos and videos of that period are valuable for us not only as a source of information of the business Michael was planning at the time, but also as evidence of his state of his health, mood and general demeanor and in this respect the video and photos made in February 2009 are somewhat worrisome.

The video gives the date as February 27, 2009 and the pictures from the same event date it as February 7, 2009, however the exact date is not even that important.

WHAT THE PHOTOS SAY

michael-and-christian-audigier-do-some-shopping-at-dior-and-dolce-gabbana-at-rodeo-drive(395)-m-37

February 7, 2009

In contrast to his previous appearance with Audigier in May 2008 where Michael looked happy, confident and vibrant, these February 2009 pictures (whatever their exact date is) show him as frail, insecure and probably even in not too good health.

If the picture was taken on February 7, 2009 then it shows Michael only a week after signing that contract with AEG and it means that it was this frail man that AEG signed up for three and a half years to do a world tour for them involving at least 186 shows as Gongaware  put it down in his projections for AEG.

And if this is February 27, 2009 then it is happening only a week before AEG took Michael to a press-conference in London where they will first announced 10 shows and eventually increased them to 50.

In both cases it makes me wonder how come that AEG did not notice Michael’s frailty and how come they could so easily announce 30, then 45 and finally 50 shows for this frail-looking man?

Didn’t they realize that they should have got Michael’s proper consent for increasing the number from to 50 shows and that setting concerts with one day of rest between the shows for him was really too much?

If Randy Phillips saw what we see now how could he dare put Michael Jackson on a plane despite his will, make him go to London and slap him forcing him to do a press-conference which wasn’t even needed as tickets were selling at a wild pace anyway?

I understand that what I am saying now about Michael’s health is going against the strategy of Katherine Jackson’s lawyers at the AEG trial, but though I fully support Katherine Jackson in her lawsuit against AEG I am simply incapable to stretch the truth that much.

Let me make myself clear.

I also think that Michael was an incredibly strong man and could have done any number of shows – however this was possible only if they he had not been in association with AEG Live.

Under AEG’s supervision Michael was doomed to die, as the only method AEG knew for treating Michael Jackson was bullying, insulting, taking advantage of him and squeezing out of him the maximum profit for their own precious selves irrespective of the interests of the artist who was to toil on their arenas.

And considering that to be able to survive any artist needs at least 7 hours of sleep, for an insomniac like Michael Jackson the AEG bully was absolutely no partner.

March 14, 2009 MICHAEL IS IMPOSSIBLY THIN!

On March 14, 2009 MICHAEL IS IMPOSSIBLY THIN!

Now the Jacksons’ lawyers are keeping to AEG’s then official position that everything was super fine and 50 shows were a great beginning of a long world tour that could last for three and a half years.

We all know that this way they are using AEG’s own lies against the liars themselves.  But my purpose here is to tell the truth and the harsh truth of the matter is that Michael would have never survived his cooperation with AEG for the simple reason that it was impossible to survive it.

How was it possible to survive it if despite seeing how frail Michael was in winter-spring 2009 they still totally ignored his state of health and set him up for an enormous number of concerts?

How was it possible to survive cooperation with these people if they never even asked for Michael’s opinion and set all dates between them and Tohme only, as they themselves say now?

How was it possible to do those shows if they spaced them so close together that Michael had to perform with only one day of rest in between?

How was it possible to survive if they planned at least 186 shows for him at the age of 50, and at a mad and inhuman schedule of three shows a week too?

Look at how terribly thin Michael was already on March 14, 2009. This was was the very midst of AEG’s happy craze over almost a million tickets sold and at the same time one of the most tragic periods of Michael Jackson’s life.

His demeanor at this moment reflects how terrible a blow those 50 shows were and how hard he took this news. He probably stopped eating altogether as over here he is a ghost of his former self.

No, the pictures of the end of February/middle of March tell us that AEG were simply obliged to have better regard for the well-being of the artist  - they should have stuck to the original 10 shows only and announced them without forcing him into any press-conferences, and should have done it as all normal people do, via a notice in the press. They should have left him alone and relieved him of all the pressure, and allowed him to prepare for the show the way he saw fit –  and only then things would have been perfectly okay.

April 10, 2009 Leaving the Bel-Air hotel

April 10, 2009 Leaving the Bel-Air hotel

April 10, 2009

April 10, 2009

The fact that he would have surely regained his strength had he been treated by his partners in a humane way is again proven by the photos – this time by those made in April 2009.

At that time Michael felt very well. The huge success of fully selling out his concerts and the enthusiastic welcome Michael received in London gave a tremendous boost to his spirits.

The boost was so big that despite all his worry and disappointment over those 50 shows he regained his energy, resumed training, and even visibly gained weight under the good care of his chef Kai Chase. Here is an excerpt from Kai Chase’s testimony at the AEG trial where she describes him the way he was in April and then in June (in May she did not see him):

Q.  ”The time that you left Mr. Jackson in April you described him as upbeat.  How would you describe his physical condition when you last saw him?

A.  In April?

Q.  Yes.

A.  His physical … He was strong. He was healthy he was active. He was interactive with a lot of us. And … Yeah. He looked good. 

Q. And could you tell us approximately when you did return to the Carolwood house?

A. I returned June the 2nd.

Q. All right. Now, previously I had asked you what Mr. Jackson was like when you had left in April, and now I’m going to ask you did you notice any difference in Mr. Jackson in June of 2009 from the last time that you had seen him.

A. Yes. I noticed that Mr. Jackson — he looked very different.

Q. How did he appear to you?

A. He appeared very — very weak. He looked very much thinner, he looked undernourished, and he didn’t look as well as I had seen him in April.

May 15, 2009 SAD

May 15, 2009. Kai Chase saw Michael again on June 2nd: “He seemed like he was — had a lot of — just he was thinking, and the weight of the world on his shoulders”

Q. Would you say that the — this was a subtle difference or an obvious difference?

A. It was an obvious difference.

Q. Okay. Did it alarm you?

A. Yes, it did. It concerned me greatly.

A. He came to me and he asked me — actually, he told me — he said, “I need you to keep me healthy. I don’t know why you left, I don’t — I need you to keep me and my children healthy.” I looked at him with great concern, and I felt bad, but he — he was saying, basically, “I need you to take care of my health and feeding me healthy and feeding my children healthy. They’re killing me.” So when he said that to me, I thought that he was being overworked, he was over rehearsed.

….Q. Can you describe his emotional state or what you observed in him daily after that meeting? [with AEG bosses in MJ's house seen by Kai Chase in June]

A. He was — he seemed like he was — had a lot of — just he was thinking, and the weight of the world on his shoulders, and just concerned and frightened and scared. It was a lot of — a lot of those emotions.”

But let us get back to April 2009 when Michael was still fine. Another reason why Michael looked and was so well and upbeat in April 2009 was because at that time he managed to get rid of his manager Tohme.

Some paparazzi made a rare photo of Michael having a serious talk with Tohme on April 1, 2009.

April 1, 2009

April 1, 2009 A talk with Tohme at the Bel-Air hotel

By then Michael had already fired Tohme and judging by the uncharacteristic askance look on Tohme’s face he was making some requests of Michael but Michael was not even looking at him and this shows how determined he was not to have anything to do with this person any longer.

By providing all these pictures here I mean to say that Michael’s deterioration of health was not just a steady process which started at one point and ended at another.

No, the period of January–June 2009 was a period of ups and downs in Michael’s life and his health was deteriorating and recovering again depending on the number of blows, insults and humiliation he received from AEG and the amount of love, hope and encouragement he got from his fans and other people supporting him in his endeavor.

By these pictures alone you can almost certainly say when Michael was desperately fighting for his dignity in a struggle against his bullies, and when they more or less left him alone and he was able to live a relatively comfortable life raising his children, working on his music, training for the show and still being hopeful of the future ahead of him.

The photos for that period enable us to decipher the events taking place in Michael’s life, allow us to make a travel back in time and see what factors were dominant for Michael at its different points.

Our next stop in this time travel is April 27, 2009 and it will again be connected with Christian Audigier  as on that day Michael Jackson and his children visited an Ed Hardy shop.

ED HARDY SHOP AND AUDIGIER AGAIN

April 27, 2009 at Ed Hardy shop

April 27, 2009 at Ed Hardy shop

What does Michael’s visit to Ed Hardy have to do with Audigier?

It has to do a lot, because Ed Hardy is Christian Audigier’s label.

Audigier does not impress me as an exceptional designer, but he definitely has a knack for using other people’s talents for creating new brands for himself and his partners.

Thus he used the tattoos of artist Ed Hardy for making some new designs and this is how he created his new Ed Hardy label. The same was probably meant to be done for Michael Jackson and his glamorous style.

So I see it as absolutely no  coincidence that in April 2009 Michael visited an Ed Hardy shop – this visit was most probably connected with his then project with Christian Audigier.

When seeing those pictures for the first time I thought that Michael arrived there to do some shopping, but after learning of Michael’s plans with Christian Audigier I now realize that he was simply doing marketing research for his own brand of clothing and accessories.

He inspected every single piece on sale at Ed Hardy and was surely doing it to acquire some ideas for himself and better familiarize himself with Audigier’s designs.

To be able to spend some time at his pleasure there Michael tried to look as inconspicuous as he only could and therefore used his usual means – a mask, an oversized jacket and other ridiculous clothes, this way only attracting maximum attention to himself.

May 22, 2009 The King is at Christian Audiger's birthday party

May 22, 2009 The King attends Christian Audiger’s birthday party

By the way the media approach to Michael Jackson will never cease to surprise me.

When Michael’s looks were at their best no one was really paying attention and this is the reason why we never saw his pictures from that Audigier’s party.

But when he was at his ridiculous worst all the media was immediately there, and his visit to Ed Hardy’s shop was no exception.

I’ve also looked up Audigier’s designs and can tell you frankly that I am unimpressed, but a couple of things he did for Michael got MJ’s approval and are not that bad.

WILD PROMOTION 

A belt from Christian Audigier's collection for Michael Jackson's clothing line

A belt from Christian Audigier’s collection for Michael Jackson’s clothing line

This collection was shown to the Estate in the hope for selling them at triple the prices after Michael’s death but the Estate was evidently not interested. And this is when Audigier showed himself at his absolute worst.

Even before Michael’s death MJ’s name was used by the designer for extensive promotion of himself, but now the process went beyond any control.

First he called himself Michael Jackson’s favorite designer and said that Michael admired him. Well, this is quite possible, so let me not argue the point:

MICHAEL JACKSON’S FAVORITE DESIGNER, Christian Audigier has just released his newest collections this October. And I believe, me and Michael have something in common. I also love the eccentric French man who is widely considered one of the most rising designer in fashion industry. In fact, American Super Star Magazine called him ‘perhaps the greatest marketing genius in the world today’. Wow!

A jacket designed by Audigier for MJ's clothing line

A jacket designed by Audigier for MJ’s clothing line

The native of Avignon, France –CHRISTIAN AUDIGIER is no stranger to fashion world. He was the primary force behind the rise of Von Dutch and making the Von Dutch hat a style trend. Later he found his own line ED HARDY - based on the work of an American tattoo artist, Don Ed Hardy and his own namesake ‘Christian Audigier’. He has a daughter named Crystal, and has made a brand with her called ‘Crystal Rock’. Christian Audigier is also behind the SMET – Born on the Street, in collaboration with his long-time friend, Johnny Halliday who is widely considered a French version of Elvis Presley.

King of Pop Michael Jackson is one of Audigier’s admirers. In fact, they’re both a close friend.  Since 2007 the self-made French fashion mogul had been developing a clothing line with Michael Jackson prior to his sudden death last June. Unveiled on August 2009, the range includes a pair of rhinestone socks and sequined gloves.

Christian Audigier is the new owner of Michael Jackson Neverland Ranch as he bought it on September 2009. He plans to obtain authorization to turn the house into a museum, and later would open it every June on the anniversary of Jackson’s death and organize exhibitions and shows.

http://www.men-access.com/gadget-mechanic-bag-the-2009-autumn-collections-of-vif-speed-shop-58-by-christian-audigier/

As you have seen from the above Audigier said he was buying Neverland and even assured everyone that he was getting the keys to it in two weeks. He wanted to turn Neverland into a museum and a place for Michael’s fans to flock to where Michael’s memorabilia would be sold accompanied by Audigier’s brands.

The news was announced together with the photos of Michael Jackson and Audigier placed on the walls inside and on the roof of his shops:

Christian Audigier Buys Neverland Ranch

MJ and Audigier forever in our heartsSeptember 04, 2009 by: Bridget Daly

The Neverland Ranch has just gotten a new owner! According to reports, Christian Audigier has just purchased the estate.

According to AFP, Audigier bought the $90 million ranch to serve as his company’s headquarters for Ed Hardy.

Audigier said in an interview, “I can have the house in one month now. I get the keys two weeks from today.

He’d planned on turning the house into a museum to honor Michael, but hasn’t been able to obtain authorization to do so. So now instead, Christian will open the doors of the estate on each anniversary of Michael’s death in June, and organize exhibits and shows.

Great! So instead of circus animals roaming the property filled with carnival rides, Neverland will be dripping from ceiling to floor with Ed Hardy crap.

http://www.hollyscoop.com/michael-jackson/christian-audigier-buys-neverland-ranch.html

The negotiations with the Estate over authorization to organize shows at Neverland evidently went nowhere, however some details of the deal with Tom Barrack disclosed on the way turned out to be interesting.

Tom Barrack was universally called by all those newspapers the new owner of Neverland (which he really was as all that talk about a joint venture was simply dust thrown into people’s eyes), and the sum of $22 mln he paid to Fortress for buying the foreclosure note on Neverland in 2008 only a year later quickly turned into $97 mln which was the real price Tom Barrack assessed Neverland for.

So our conclusion that Tom Barrack regarded buying that foreclosure note for Neverland as a lucky acquisition of great property almost for peanuts was correct – the price he really estimated the property for was at least four and a half times higher.

I know that for some it is legitimate business but let us not call such deals “saving” Neverland or “helping” Michael Jackson, okay?

THIS POST WAS WRITTEN BY JD ON JULY 13, 2009
POSTED UNDER: REAL ESTATE

LONDON – French fashion tycoon Christian Audigier is set to buy Michael Jackson’s Neverland home.

“I have decided to buy that house,” the Mirror quoted him as telling French TV.

The designer is also planning to build a theme complex dedicated to the icon similar to Elvis Presley’s Graceland.

He may also offer online tours for fans to the ranch that Jackson turned into a personal theme park.

Colony Capital who had purchased the California ranch in 2008 for 20 million-pound is keen to sell it after the legend’s demise.

Neverland is now worth an estimated $97,150,000.

http://www.nevadacounty.com/michael-jacksons-neverland-home-has-a-buyer/

Christian Audigier at Michael Jackson's house in Carolwood drive. He uses the picture to advertize Ed Hardy goods

Christian Audigier at Michael Jackson’s house in Carolwood drive (see the vase). He uses this picture to advertize Ed Hardy goods

However for some reason the Neverland deal was never realized and then Audigier announced that he was buying the house in Carolwood drive where Michael died – in order to use it as his office and a Michael Jackson museum.

He said that he already started to buy for it some of Michael’s memorabilia.

The deal was to be finalized when Michael’s lease on the house expired in December 2009 – so the lease was paid for the full year beginning with December 2008 when Michael moved in there and therefore should have amounted to $1,2 mln:

Christian Audigier hasn’t bought MJ’s Neverland

BY ANI
SUNDAY, OCTOBER 4, 2009
LONDON – French fashion designer Christian Audigier has refuted claims that he has purchased Michael Jackson’s Neverland Ranch home in Santa Barbara County, California.

However, the creator of fashion line Ed Hardy has bought the LA home the King of Pop passed away in.

“I have purchased the home Michael passed away in… I want to create a memorabilia and museum,” the Daily Express quoted him as telling HollyScoop.com.

“So far, I’m buying a big collection of memorabilia and personal objects that he has,” he added.

The designer added that he would not buy Neverland as it only held bad memories for the ‘Thriller’ hitmaker.

He said: “He didn’t like Neverland. He didn’t want to go back there… so it’s not Neverland at all.”

Jackson had quit Neverland in 2005 after he was hit with child molestation case and investigators raided the estate.

Audigier has reportedly paid 90 million dollars for his friend’s former home. (ANI)

http://entertainment.gaeatimes.com/2009/10/04/christian-audigier-hasnt-bought-mjs-neverland-38600/

Then we learn from some gossipy real estate site that Audigier did not buy the house in Carolwood Drive either and bought the house belonging to Nicolas Cage instead. As to the house where Michael Jackson died it turns out that he was simply planning to lease it.

Somewhere in between this news we learn that the house when Michael died actually belongs to Audigier’s partner Hubert Guez, who is the CEO of his Ed Hardy label. World is a small place indeed!

FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 2009

UPDATE: Nic Cage and Michael Jackson

…Reports are starting to trickle out that prolific property collector Nic Cage has sold his legendary Bel Air, CA mansion for $14,500,000 in a private deal to the perma-tanned and publicity hungry French fashion designer Christian Audigier. Your Mama smells a rat.

Although the Cage estate on Copa de Oro Road was removed from the open market in late May of 2009, property records we accessed do not yet reflect a transfer of ownership. In an effort to sort out the truth of the matter, we put out some feelers for confirmation and even though it’s practically the crack of the damn dawn we heard back instantly from Gary Gabsallthetime who said, “Don’t believe it.” We don’t, and neither should you until some real evidence presents itself.

The children may recall that Mister Audigier, a man who manages to get hundreds of dollars for t-shirts and jeans emblazoned with sparkly things, has cut quite a swath through the gossip glossies lately. Over the summer Mister Audigier was seen humping around the South of France with octodad John Gosselin whose Warholian 15 minutes should have been up a very long time ago.

But it’s Mister Audigier’s connections to Michael Jackson that is really launching Mister Audigier into the gossip stratosphere. First it was reported that Mister Audigier planned on leasing the Holmby Hills mansion where Michael Jackson was given a lethal dose of Propofol by his personal physician Dr. Conrad Murray. His plan, it was reported, was to use the N. Carolwood Drive mansion as his company headquarters. Some reports have said Mister Audigier is actually a co-owner of the Carolwood Drive estate making him Mister Jackson’s landlord.

We don’t find any documents that link Mister Audigier to the property, but that does not mean he does not have a financial stake in the property that official records show is owned by Roxanne and Hubert Guez who also happens to be the CEO of Ed Hardy, one of many labels “designed” by Monsieur Audigier. Coinkydink? You decide.

Ever the publicity opportunist, on the heels of Mister Jackson’s death Mister Audigier has launched a line of clothing he claims he worked on with and was approved by Michael Jackson, because every damn fool needs a pair of rhinestone socks.

The newest rumors (and reports) say that Mister Audigier has finalized the purchase of Michael Jackson’s Neverland Ranch in Los Olivos, CA. We don’t know if that’s true, and we’re skeptical, but in an interview with the Agence France-Presse, Mister Audigier is quoted, “I bought the Michael Jackson house. It’s something I’m gonna open just for the birthday (sic) of his death every June, where the media is gonna be able to come in and we’ll do exposes, etc.”

As far as we know, Mister Audigier, who in a stunning display of narcissism has his every move recorded by a private videographer, still lives in a mansion on S. Muirfield Road in Hancock Park that records reveal he bought in January of 2007 for $4,780,000. Mister Cage’s Bel Air behemoth was first listed about 1,000 years ago at a ridiculous $35,000,000 and was last on the open market with a much less insane asking price of $17,500,000. Neverland Ranch is owned by Colony Capital who took possession and control of the massive ranch in 2008 as part of a complicated financial arrangement with Mister Jackson and it’s widely believed Colony Capital would like to sell the property to re-coup their investment.

POSTED BY YOUR MAMA AT 7:38 AM

Home Where Michael Jackson Suffered Cardiac Arrest Belongs To Ed Hardy CEO

First Published: June 29, 2009 3:02 PM EDTCredit: Getty Images

LOS ANGELES, CALIF. —  The Holmby Hills estate that Jackson rented for $100,000 a month was owned by Ed Hardy’s CEO Hubert Guez.

The sprawling French chateau-style estate was built in 2002 and has seven bedrooms and 13 bathrooms.

Following the singer’s tragic death, fans gathered in front of the West LA home holding signs that featured Jackson with label founder Christian Audigier.

Jackson was seen shopping at a LA-area Ed Hardy store in April with his children.

According to The Los Angeles Times, the future of the pop star’s most famous residence, Neverland Ranch, remains in limbo. Colony Capital, who purchased the massive Santa Barbara County ranch last year for $22.5 million after Jackson defaulted on it, will not say what it plans to do with the property. 

http://www.accesshollywood.com/home-where-michael-jackson-suffered-cardiac-arrest-belongs-to-ed-hardy-ceo_article_19904

The house in Carolwood drive (the vase in the parlour)

The house in Carolwood drive (see the vase)

After the rather confusing news that the house Michael was renting for $100,000 a month belonged to Audigier’s partner Hubert Guez, we also learn that Hubert’s wife  bought the house in 2004 for $18,5 mln and before Michael’s arrival in Los Angeles in 2008 the Guez couple was unsuccessfully trying to sell it for $38mln.

A year after Michael’s death the price dropped to $28mln and in 2012 it was eventually sold at less than the original price – for $18mln (not to Audigier).

By now we have already formed some impression of Christian Audigier’s ways and all I can say about them is that to a certain extent I am grateful that Michael did not finalize his deal with Audigier because with a partner like him it could have resulted for Michael in a big embarrassment.

MICHAEL’S “LAVISH STYLE”

But the story of renting out the Carolwood drive house to Michael cannot be finished if we don’t look further into who actually rented it for Michael.

From Sullivan’s book we learn that the house was found for Michael by Tohme Tohme who said he knew the real estate developer Mohammed Hadid, who built the house in 2002 and whose other house,  in Las Vegas Tohme also tried to sell to Michael when he was living there in 2008:

QUOTE from Sullivan’s book:

By the middle of November, Jackson was telling his manager that he wanted to start looking at houses in Bel Air. Tohme was delighted, until he discovered that the first home to capture his client’s imagination was the most expensive on the entire LA market, a lavish estate that had just been built at the top of Bel Air’s most exclusive street, Nimes Road, by the former owner of the Ritz-Carlton Hotels, Mohamed Hadid.

…Hadid refused when Tohme asked if his client could rent Le Belvedere, but said he would allow Jackson to spend the night in the house with his children “ in order to feel the place.” It was agreed that Hadid and his son would vacate the property on Thanksgiving morning to spend that day and night in Santa Barbara. Tohme and his wife prepared a feast, then transported it, along with their own children, Michael, and Michael’s children to Le Belvedere, where they all dined together. “We stayed late, then left Michael and his children and returned home,” Tohme recalled.

“The next morning I went and picked up Michael and his children and took them back to the Hotel Bel-Air. On the way Michael said he didn’t want Hadid’s house. He said he heard some bad voice there.

Michael was a very spiritual guy, and he was guided by that in his decisions.” Over the next few days, Tohme convinced Michael that renting a home was the right move, at least until they returned from London after the O2 shows.

With the help of a real estate broker friend named Joyce Essex, Tohme located an estate on Carolwood Drive in Holmby Hills, a neighborhood that—with Beverly Hills on one side and Bel Air on the other—formed the fabled “ Platinum Triangle.” The property’s 17,171-square-foot, three-story, French chateau–style mansion belonged to Christian Audigier’s senior partner in his Ed Hardy stores: Hubert Guez.

It is interesting that Tohme mentions Christian Audiger’s connection to that house but does not say a word of his own connection to it through Mohammer Hadid, its previous owner whom he knew perfectly well. Instead he said that he “located” the house with the help of a real estate broker.

Well, learning that both houses Tohme recommended to Michael in Las Vegas and Los Angeles involve one person – Mohammed Hadid – somehow did not surprise me:

Michael Jackson was renting this California mansion for $100,000 a month. The home was built by real estate developer Mohammed Hadid and his wife Yolanda. Mohamed owns Hadid Development. The 20,000 square foot mansion is located on Carolwood Drive in Holmby Hills, CA. The home was built with the finest imported materials such as Jerusalem marble and Russian wood floors. The home has a gorgeous 2-story entry complete with iron front door, crystal chandelier, and hand carved wooden staircase. The home also has an ornate living room, custom kitchen with walk-in freezer, cozy family room, Russian themed movie theater, wine cellar, exercise room, playroom, and master suite with his and her baths. The home also has a 7 car garage and a swimming pool with pool house.

http://www.celebhomes.net/celebrityhomes/michael-jackson/

Being Michael’s manager Tohme was supposed to find for Michael the best offers, the best prices and provide him with at least some choices, however despite that Tohme’s offers to Michael were usually limited solely to his friends as the example of bringing in Colony Capital for “saving” Neverland proves it, so over hereTohme’s ways absolutely did not surprise me.

What really surprised me was the fact that the house belonged to Christian Audigier’s partner Howard Guez. After learning this news it didn’t require too big stretch of imagination to suppose that the house on Carolwood Drive was imposed on Michael by two people simultaneously – by Tohme who ‘located’ it through an agent of his and Christian Audigier who out of all the houses available in Los Angeles evidently also recommend this property only and at a mere $100,000 a month.

Those who work on the real estate market say that the rent for the house was heavily inflated and that a more realistic figure would be $25,000-30,000 a month. We won’t be able to find this information in official sources but in the comments on that gossipy real estate site the insiders exchange their opinions quite openly. Over there they say that the price for renting out this property was not worth the $100,000 Michael Jackson paid for it, and for half a year after his death too (?):

  • MJ was paying $100K a month for a house that should’ve rented for $25-30. This partly explains where his money went. The vultures killed their golden goose. They pushed him into 50 concert dates that he had no hope of completing (let alone starting) so that he would make even more money for them to spend. Vultures, every one.
  • Hey Mama, I just thought you should know that this property is back up for lease for…. $300,000 fucking dollars a month!!! It is a fully furnished lease that includes a maid and security guard (for those crazy fans).
    I can’t believe how the owner of this house is trying to capitalize on Michael’s death. It wasn’t even worth the $100,000/month Michael was paying for it, this is outrageous.
  • That house is not worth $100,000 monthly rent. The prices of real estate are dropping continuously.

One of the insiders’ comment was especially enlightening. The commentator called the people involved in the deal a ‘mafia’ which had the most part of the sum paid for the rent as a kick back for themselves.

This kick back probably means that a certain person(s) arranged a lucrative deal for the owner of the house (Hubert Guez) and this owner paid to the person(s) who brought the client (Michael Jackson) a certain share of that money in “gratitude” for the favor done.

This scheme does not surprise me in the least as this was what Tohme did when he brought the Colony Capital to Michael (now we know that he was working there as a consultant and received for his services a fee though he was also Michael’s manager with a salary for his job), so assuming that with a house in Carolwood drive  a similar scheme was employed would again be not too much stretch of imagination. And I cannot completely rule it out that Audigers did not take part in the deal too.

Here is the insider’s comment mentioning the “mafia” and “kick back” points:

  • Mama, it is well known by this time that MJ was being blindsided, bamboozled and bilked by the latest ‘mafia’ ring to leave their boots outside the front door. No way the house is worth that much in rent but MJ had no idea about those things. The inside gossip was that most of that $100k monthly rent check was finding its kick-back way back home if you know what I mean but not into MJ’s coffers of course.

http://realestalker.blogspot.ru/2009/07/update-michael-jackson_01.html

The above is a very clear explanation where Michael’s money was going and why he had to have so lavish a style. This style actually gave an opportunity for those who were supposedly Michael’s admirers, friends, employees and trusted managers to have a lavish style of their own and all this totally free of charge and fully at Michael Jackson’s expense. 

In comparison with these creatures densely populating our planet Michael Jackson was the most honest, regular, modest and down-to-earth guy. I agree with the man who said at Michael Jackson’s funeral that it is the world around him that was completely abnormal while Michael Jackson was the most normal person of us all. A normal man who was forced to live in totally abnormal circumstances.

And a mere look at it from aside makes his life story completely heart-breaking.


Filed under: AEG THE HORRIBLE, Jacksons vs. AEG, The SOCIETY Tagged: AEG, Christian Audigier, Michael Jackson, Tohme Tohme

Jacksons – AEG trial Day 56. The SIDEBAR at D.Fournier’s testimony, Michael Jackson’s NIGHTMARE and Jordan Chandler’s HUMOR. part 2

$
0
0

THE SIDEBAR

During the sidebar that followed David Fournier’s testimony on July 25, 2013 (see the previous post for the full of it) the first thing the AEG lawyers did was disclosing their strategy regarding Michael’s doctors.

This is how we find out the reason why they ask each and every doctor whether Michael socialized with them and invited them to Neverland.  The reason why they ask is because they are going to claim that by making friends with doctors he was ensuring himself a steady supply of drugs!

So it is the same Neverland story all over again Only previously it was ‘boys’ and now it will be ‘doctors’.

Why can’t these people interpret Michael’s behavior from any other point of view rather than some criminal gain? Is it because they are that way themselves? But Michael was different and this is why he could not survive among these people!

AEG’s idea is exactly the same as the one we previously heard about ‘boys’ – only then he “invited families in order to lure boys into his lair of sin” and on the basis of those assumptions they made some crazy conclusions about him, and now Michael Jackson “invited doctors with their families to Neverland to help organize a supply of drugs for himself”  and on this basis the AEG experts are again claiming something totally outrageous!

Goodness gracious, will there ever be a time when all these people realize that Michael invited everyone to his place only because he was open and hospitable, selfless and generous, and wanted others to enjoy themselves in Neverland in the same way he enjoyed himself there?

These AEG beasts know perfectly well that on most occasions when the doctors came to Neverland Michael was not even there but even this does not prevent them from making up all those devilish stories!

David Fournier was naturally examined on the issue of Neverland too and from him we find that within a 10-year long period of their friendship Michael invited him to Neverland twice. On one occasion Michael was present and on the second he was not. No propofol or other drugs were ever asked for or even discussed:

Q. So your professional relationship with Mr. Jackson spanned about a decade. Did you also have a personal relationship with him?

A. Well, after the first bunch of interactions with him, he was a very warm, likable guy, I’d characterize him. We became friends.

Q. Did you socialize with him from time to time?

A. No.

Q. Did you ever visit Neverland?

A. I visited Neverland twice. He was there once; there was another time when he wasn’t there. I was just there with family, showing them around.

Q. In all the years that you knew Michael, both as someone who provided him anesthesia and as a friend, did you ever know that he was using propofol to help him sleep?

A. No.

Q. Is that something he ever discussed with you?

A. No.

Q. Is that something you had any suspicion of?

A. No.

Q. So fair to say that that’s something that you learned about after Mr. Jackson passed away?

Mr. Panish. Objection. Objection. Calls for hearsay.

The judge. Sustained.

IS BIBLE TALK RELEVANT FOR THE CASE?

Michael Jackson was a giver and not a taker. When he invited people to Neverland he didn’t want anything of anyone – all he wanted of people was to treat him like he was treating them. “Do to others what you would have them do to you”. Exactly as the Bible says.

But even the bible reading which evidently took place often in Neverland is now disputed, doubted and twisted by these AEG beasts.

The Bible was raised in connection with Dr. Sasaki who treated Michael in 1993. It turns out that Michael spoke to him about God as the strength, solace and the foothold the Almighty provided helped Michael to overcome his dependency on Demerol. A similar 12-step program centering on faith in God similarly helped him in 2003 when Dr. Farshchian introduced him to that program.

Upon hearing all that the AEG lawyers said some nonsense that if Michael talked with Dr. Sasaki about the bible in 1993 it does not mean that bible reading was necessary for the 12-step program in the 2000s. That is why the talk about the bible “is not fair inference” for them and they evidently want all of it excluded in further court proceedings. Well, for them it is no fair reference and for me it is and even looks crucial to the whole problem, because in both cases Michael was praying to God to help him overcome his dependency on drugs and in both cases it helped.

What’s interesting is that while Michael’s conversations with his doctors about God are considered irrelevant by AEG lawyers, the mere fact of inviting these doctors to his ranch is not irrelevant for them, because their experts are keen to prove that such invitations were his “subconscious motivation to protect his drug supply”! Michael was speaking about one thing and they discern behind his words some “subconscious motivations” on his part – no, the whole absurdity of it is really crossing the line!

And while the AEG lawyers want to introduce invitations to Neverland as an opening to all those ‘drug supplies’ they simultaneously want to exclude as irrelevant the same doctors’ observations about what a good dad Michael was for his children.

Indeed, why should his great love for children and fantastic parental skills be relevant for AEG? It is okay to insinuate that he was an irresponsible drug addict but saying that he was a responsible and dedicated parent is absolutely irrelevant for their case….

Oh, Lord, why don’t you turn these liars and hypocrites into pillars of salt?

And why is AEG raking all this Neverland business at all? Neverland was over for Michael in 2005 so how are the friendships formed there before 2005 relevant for what AEG did to Michael Jackson in 2009? Or are these desperate attempts and crazy maneuvers the only arguments they can give in their defense?

The further we look the more absurd and Sneddon/Arvizo like it is turning into…

Ms. Cahan:  (reading from Dr. Sasaki’s deposition at the sidebar):
Q.  Did you ever have any communications with Michael Jackson outside of your treatment with him?
A.  Yes.
Q.  How so?
A.  “I have to look at my chart on this.” And then he refreshed himself. “He was kind enough to invite myself and family to Never NeverLand.” “Is that it, Neverland?” And he confirms he went to Neverland. I don’t think there’s a hearsay objections there. 

Ms. Cahan:  What is goes to, your honor, is that our addiction experts are going to talk about the unusually close relationships Michael cultivated with physicians as consistent with addiction and keeping supply lines to drugs open; and so it’s necessary for us to address the testimony, and we’ve designated just relevant portions so the concept is there because it’s foundation.

Judge:  But then you want to keep out the fact that when he was at Neverland there were observations about what a good dad he was, and –

Ms. Cahan:  Your honor, and we discussed when we were talking about this with Dr. Farshchian, in every single one of these medical depositions there’s a portion at the end where plaintiffs’ counsel asks about, “Did you observe Michael with his children? What kind of a dad was he?” And it’s really outside the scope. And as we discussed with Dr. Farshchian and your honor ruled, that’s something plaintiffs could have designated in their case. Maybe there will be a reason to address it on rebuttal, although they’ve certainly presented plenty of testimony to that effect in their case in chief. They chose not to designate it, and it’s really outside the scope, and it’s going to make all these depositions run long.

Judge:  If you want to designate this, then I guess now it is, though. I don’t know how it would be outside the scope if we’re talking about communications and “He invited me to Neverland,” so what went on at Neverland would now become relevant. 

Mr. Boyle:  Can I be heard on this? Your honor, so she’s made clear they want to now put on this thing that Michael gets close to doctors. Okay? So that’s part of their case, apparently. So I think it’s totally fair that we show what that relationship was with the doctors. It’s not like Michael was taking them out drinking, buddying up to them so he could get more drugs on the side. I mean, he’s inviting them to Neverland; sometimes Michael is there, sometimes he’s not.

Judge:  Right. Sasaki I think said he wasn’t even there at the time.

Mr. Boyle:  Exactly. And then also what I would like to add.

Judge:  It’s still an invitation to the ranch.

Mr. Boyle:  Fine.

Ms. Cahan:  The fact that he’s socializing with his doctors is relevant to our experts in assessing whether he had addiction issues. We think it’s something the jury should be able to consider.

Judge:  Although it’s something interesting that he never asked for — at least according to this person, he never asked for drugs from this particular person.

Ms. Cahan:  And you’ll hear inconsistent things from other people.

Mr. Boyle:  Nor did he ask for any from Dr. Sasaki, who is a highly respected plastic surgeon, one of the best in country.  So that’s fine if they want to try to make that inference, but we should be allowed to say, “okay. What happened at Neverland?” so it’s not just hanging out there for the jury in some ominous – He was invited to Neverland and he went. So he went there, he saw Michael’s kids, he ate a salad for lunch, Michael talked to him about the bible. 

Here’s why that’s relevant; because you’ve heard from Dr. Farshchian now that they played that Michael was going through a 12-step program. God is always involved in those things. The fact that he was talking to Dr. Sasaki about the bible is relevant to the fact that Michael was trying to get off these drugs.  And so they’re trying to keep out all that stuff and put in this implication that Dr. Sasaki gets invited to Neverland like that’s somehow a bad thing. If we’re going to Neverland, let’s go to Neverland. 

Ms. Cahan:  Dr. Sasaki went to Neverland in 1993. That’s when he was treating Mr. Jackson. Dr. Farshchian was talking about 2002/2003, in that time period. There’s no testimony that there is a 12-step program that Mr. Jackson is working in 1993, nor, based on my understanding of 12-step programs, is reading the bible necessarily a part of that. I don’t think that that’s a fair inference.

Mr. Boyle:  You’re right about that.

Ms. Cahan:  Your honor, we don’t have a problem with, “you were invited to Neverland ranch, I went to Neverland ranch, here’s what you did there.” but then when it gets into, you know, “and did you observe Michael with his children? And was Michael a good and loving father, from what you saw?” that’s all — that’s the same issue that we addressed with Dr. Farshchian that’s really outside the scope of the designation. Just because that observation happened at Neverland doesn’t make it within the scope.

Judge:  Maybe I should have excluded it altogether for everyone, because now it just — it’s expanding this thing.

Mr. Boyle:  I mean, I’m — I just don’t want to — a strange inference about an invitation to Neverland and then no followup. Our designation is probably about 25 seconds on their — on their —

Ms. Cahan:  What is it specifically that you want in that was excluded? Your honor, while he’s looking, the testimony that follows that was allowed in says, “We went up there, he wasn’t there, he wasn’t supposed to be there. Staff served us lunch and showed us around.” “You went with your family to Neverland Ranch?” “Yes.” That gives the context of why he went to Neverland Ranch. I think the very fact that Michael’s cultivating these close relationships with his doctors is something that other addiction experts have told us is quite relevant to the diagnosis that they’re going to be rendering. 

Mr. Boyle:  Okay. So, again, your honor, they’re clearly putting Mr. Jackson’s character in issue here. They’re talking about — they’re basically saying that he is creating false relationships in an effort to get drugs. 

Ms. Cahan:  Not false.

Mr. Boyle:  Drug-seeking behavior, getting close to these doctors. She just said it. So, for example, we designate on page 203, line 8 — “Simple question, sir. In all your dealings with Michael Jackson, did he seem like a kind person?” “Yes.I mean, why can’t we talk about what the guy’s impression of Mr. Jackson was if they’re bringing out a case that he’s befriending them only to get drugs? I mean, it’s like – 

Ms. Cahan:  That’s not what we’re saying, and that’s not what our addiction experts say. They say it’s usually a subconscious motivation for people to protect their supply of drugs, whatever that supply is.

So Michael befriended doctors only to be able to obtain drugs from them? And how about hundreds if not thousands of ordinary people he befriended and invited to Neverland too? Many of them were ill or crippled children who came there as their dying wish! Or did those families come there as sources for drug supply too?

Can anyone tell me how much longer we will have to listen to all this AEG crap?

SURGERY IN 1993 

But the sidebar was thunderous not only because of all the AEG Neverland craziness. The real reason why I think the sidebar was a true sensation is because during their discussion we learned that Michael was given two major scalp surgeries in February and March 1993 – which was exactly the time when the Chandlers claimed that he was extremely busy with them and their boy.

The one done on March 16, 1993 was a big scalp surgery which was very painful even according to AEG’s assessments. The post-operative period required a good deal of opioid painkillers, so it was then that all those patches of opioids were placed on Michael’s body – most probably on the abdomen as is usually the case, so that no one sees them.

But if those patches of painkillers were placed somewhere on Michael’s body why did our good boy Jordan Chandler not notice them though he said he repeatedly had hot baths with Jackson??? Or did he have baths fully clothed and in his hat too?

See for yourself the eye-opening revelations at that sidebar where everything is revolving around what can be admitted in court and what can’t, while the facts of absolutely historic significance are going absolutely unnoticed by everyone!

Ms. Cahan:  The next one I have is more in the nature of the physician issues, your honor. And it’s page 61, line 25, to page 62, line 7.

Judge:  Beginning “So Dr. Klein”? 

Ms. Cahan:  Yes. Right. So it says so Dr. Klein and Dr. Hoefflin indicated that Dr. John Borenstein would be Mr. Jackson’s anesthesiologist for the procedure. This is the procedure that happened in March of 1993. And he affirms that, that’s a procedure that Dr. Sasaki did. This is the scalp surgery. So he saw that John Borenstein was there, so I don’t think that there’s any hearsay issue with that. He was told this would be the anesthesiologist, this is the anesthesiologist, this is one of the people that Mr. Fournier just referenced. I don’t think that there’s a problem with reliability of that statement. It’s not being offered for the truth. The guy actually showed up and performed the anesthesia at the surgery on March 16, 1993.

Mr. Boyle:  If it’s not being offered for the truth, I don’t know what it’s being offered for. It says these two doctors indicated that a third — it’s hearsay.
Ms. Cahan:  I think it’s relevant to the fact that this was a big, painful surgery for which anesthesia was required and appropriate.That’s something that plaintiffs were addressing today with Mr. Fournier. If they really wanted to keep that out, if they feel so strongly about it, I could let that one go; but I don’t think it’s hearsay and I don’t think there’s a problem with the reliability of that statement.

Mr. Boyle:  I really don’t care. I mean, I just don’t want to open the door to hearsay.

Judge:  Okay. So what portion did you want in? 25 through what?

Ms. Cahan:  Line 7 on page 62.

Judge:  And you want that in because there’s no other way to show what, that Borenstein was his anesthesiologist?

Ms. Cahan:  And I think it references — I think it is at this point of the designated testimony in which it’s referenced that this was a procedure that required anesthesia. There’s then subsequent discussion about all the pain medication that was prescribed afterwards. I actually think it’s probably something plaintiffs would not object to given that it shows that Mr. Jackson had a really painful procedure that required anesthesia and he subsequently was given pain medication for it.

Mr. Boyle:  Your honor, this seems like Ms. Cahan and I could just talk about these things rather than forcing this all on the court. We could figure this out.

Ms. Cahan:  And I emailed Mr. Boyle about this and didn’t get a substantive response.

Judge:  To be honest with you, I don’t see how this adds anything.

Ms. Cahan:  That’s fine, your honor. We can keep it out. It might be a little confusing for the jurors.

Judge:  It just doesn’t add anything to the testimony, as far as I can tell, but —

Ms. Stebbins:  I think it’s more in the matter of explaining the chain of events so there’s not gaps and the jurors aren’t confused, we had this change, we needed an anesthesiologist, we brought him in and did the procedure. Sometimes it’s easier if you tell those in order. I noticed in the one we watched yesterday at the beginning I was confused as to what was happening, and then it kind of smoothed this stuff out. I think that’s all this is.

To be honest with you, the news that Michael had a major surgery on March 16, 1993 is actually all we wanted from this AEG trial, as we know that AEG is guilty anyway and needed no more proof in this respect.

But the date of that surgery is absolutely essential to us, and though this information does not add anything to anyone’s testimony as the judge says it adds a whole lot to exonerating Michael of all those crazy molestation suspicions!

The judge finally rules that information about that surgery “should not be in” because none of them are bothered about the events  we are talking of.  But March 1993 was the very midst of the so-called “molestation” period and looking into the context for the surgery we recollect that sometime in April Michael went with the Chandlers to Las Vegas and they allegedly saw “Exorcist” there and Jordan was allegedly afraid to sleep alone and allegedly asked for a permission to stay in Michael’s room, and this is when it allegedly started.

And then came the beginning of May and their visit to Monaco when prior to the ceremony of getting the Millenium award from the Prince of Monaco our good little boy described in that fake declaration of his how they allagedly took a bath together and all the remaining horror of it.

But if this was the case why didn’t this lovely boy say in his declaration that Michael was either having some bandages on his scalp from a big recent surgery or should have been wearing a hat even when in a bath?

And why didn’t the boy notice any opioid patches on Michael’s abdomen or anywhere else on his body which Michael absolutely had to carry due to the terrible pain he was in – beginning with the surgery and up to November 1993 when he went to a rehab? I mean those very opioid patches Karen Faye and Dr. Farshchian were talking about?

Why didn’t Jordan see them if he were allegedly so close to Michael ?

Of course the judge does not remember any of this and she is presiding over a totally different case anyway, but we absolutely cannot leave this information unnoticed!

Mr. Boyle:  Do you know that, Jessica, or are you just saying that?
Ms. Stebbins:  I’m saying that, but that’s my understanding from what Ms. Cahan was saying.
Ms. Cahan:  It requires the context of it being a big deal surgery that required – if your honor wants to keep that out, I don’t think we need to spend more time on that one.
Judge:  I don’t think it needs to be in. Okay. What’s next?
Ms. Cahan:  Okay. The next is page 89, line 25, to page 90, line 22.

Okay, let’s see what is next. And next comes a revelation that Michael was in so much pain that at some point Dr. Sasaki refused to administer him any more pain medication and Dr. Hoefflin and Dr. Klein said that they would manage it themselves.

  1. To us it means that Michael was indeed in terrible pain after March 16th scalp surgery and this went on and on for months well into the beginning of the third leg of the Dangerous tour in August 1993.
  2. It also means to us that it was evidently Dr. Sasaki who hit the nerve on Michael’s head and not Hoefflin as I previously thought (my apologies to him), so the neuroma they sent Michael to the tour with was evidently Dr. Sasaki’s doing.
  3. Thirdly, it means that without opioids Michael was unable to function and painkillers were given to him on a continuous basis. The Jacksons’ lawyers say that Michael first had multiple appointments with Dr. Sasaki who began to prescribe him Percocet (a pill of opioid combined with Paracetamol), but since this was evidently not enough Hoefflin and Klein gave Michael Demerol too.

As Hoefflin and Klein were also providing Michael with pain medication they evidently felt responsible for what was done to poor Michael’s scalp, so now they were trying to relieve his pain, especially since it was necessary to prepare him for the last leg of the tour.

And when everyone thought that things couldn’t get any worse, those horrid allegations also broke out and this must have made Michael’s life totally unbearable.

In short once you put everything together and place it into a proper historical context all those events begin to look like a complete nightmare.

Frankly I didn’t understand much of what they discussed at that sidebar, except that the AEG lawyers are insinuating that Hoefflin and Klein were acting as Michael’s drug suppliers. However the main idea I actually grasped is that the doctors went into a panic themselves and were trying to shift the responsibility for the unsuccessful surgery on each other. Hence all this talk about who will prescribe what and why some of them are washing their hands of what they did.

I wonder if you will get the same impression of that period as I did when you read this? The impression that it was actually the worst of  nightmares?

Judge:  “Do you understand whether Dr. Klein had ever prescribed pain medication to Michael Jackson before July 3rd? And he says, “I don’t know.” Okay.

Ms. Cahan:  And then he talks about —

Judge:  So does it lack foundation, or you just — what was the objection?

Ms. Cahan:  Relevance, hearsay, calls for speculation.

Judge:  Well, he answers, “I don’t know,” so I think —

Mr. Boyle:  The designation goes all the way down to page 22 where he’s asked about conversations with Debbie Rowe. That’s clearly hearsay, out-of-court statement.

Judge:  Did I just do a general sustaining? Is that what happened? I didn’t break it down?

Mr. Boyle:  Yes, your honor.

Ms. Cahan:  That’s right. And here we’re offering the part about what he was informed about by Ms. Rowe about Mr. Jackson’s pain management. If you may remember, your honor, he performed the surgery. In an unusual turn of events Dr. Hoefflin and Dr. Klein said, “we’ll manage his pain medication,” he didn’t come to Dr. Sasaki for follow-up visits, so Dr. Sasaki was — needed to speak with Hoefflin and Klein and Ms. Rowe, who was functioning as Mr. Jackson’s nurse at the time, about how he was doing, basically had to manage him remotely. And he was asked several times to prescribe additional pain medications for Mr. Jackson even though he wasn’t seeing him in office. So this isn’t used for the truth of the increase of the pain medication, but it goes to Dr. Sasaki’s understanding of Mr. Jackson’s health status in prescribing medication for him because he wasn’t getting the information directly, he was getting it from other healthcare providers who were seeing Mr. Jackson directly. It’s a little bit of a unique situation. It’s not something we have with any of the other doctors who had direct access to Mr. Jackson when they were taking care of him.

Mr. Boyle:  It’s straight-up hearsay.

Judge:  What I hear you saying is you’re saying —

Ms. Cahan:  We’re not offering it for the truth —

Judge:  To show that —

Ms. Cahan:  — of Mr. Jackson’s need for pain medication, we’re offering it for Dr. Sasaki’s understanding that Mr. Jackson — of Mr. Jackson’s health status and subsequent plan about how to care for his health.

Judge:  Well, I thought what you were offering it for is to show that that’s why Sasaki didn’t manage his pain or give him pain medication, is because others were doing it; but that would be offered for the truth.

Ms. Cahan:  It’s really the effect on the listener, your honor.

Mr. Boyle:  Your honor, may I suggest that maybe — now that we have some time, we know that this is not being played tomorrow, make Ms. Cahan and I can just talk and get to an agreement on some of these?

Ms. Cahan:  I tried, your honor.

Mr. Boyle:  Well, no. We just didn’t have time. You sent me an email last night. What am I supposed to do? You’re putting on a witness today.

Judge:  Well, it sounds like you’re offering it for the truth.

Ms. Cahan:  We aren’t. We’re offering it for the effect on the listener.

Judge:  Which is the effect of what?

Ms. Cahan:  That he prescribed Percocet to Mr. Jackson because he understood that it was an appropriate treatment for pain.
Judge:  See, but I thought Sasaki wasn’t doing the pain management, it was somebody else.

Ms. Cahan:  So Dr. Hoefflin and Dr. Klein –

Judge:  They’re responsible.

Ms. Cahan:  — even though they have prescribing abilities, they themselves were administering Demerol to Mr. Jackson, but then they came to Dr. Sasaki and said, “will you write Mr. Jackson a prescription for 45 Percocet, and another prescription for 45 Percocet, and another prescription for 45 Percocet?” and Dr. Sasaki wasn’t able to see Mr. Jackson directly for follow-up visits during that time. He was just hearing from Dr. Klein and Dr. Hoefflin that Mr. Jackson was having his pain and that was his reason for prescribing. He’s a very reputable doctor, and I’m afraid it’s going to look suspicious to the jury if they hear that he’s prescribing Percocet to this patient who he is not seeing for follow up appointments because if they don’t know that he’s relying on the physicians who are taking care of Michael directly, or —

Mr. Boyle:  Your honor, there are multiple follow up appointments. It’s hard to argue against this. And Dr. Sasaki did a major surgery on Michael, and I don’t think it’s unusual for him to prescribe some Percocets. I don’t — they’re just trying to get hearsay stuff from other doctors on — and non-doctors on drug use. That’s all they’re doing. I mean, but, again, if I could just talk to Ms. Cahan, it’s like, you know -

Ms. Cahan:  I’m happy to speak with Mr. Boyle about it. We don’t have a great track record on agreeing to any of these things. I had asked him to agree to them and explain the non-hearsay justification for this before we filed the combined chart with your honor and didn’t get a substantive response. If he’s saying he’ll talk to me now, I’m happy to do that.

Mr. Boyle:  Ms. Cahan, please, you never agreed to one proposed —

Judge:  All this stuff about, “Did he tell you whether Michael Jackson had ever taken Percocet before?” I don’t know why that would be relevant. “Did he tell you if Michael Jackson had taken any medication prior to July 3rd, 1993?” What does that have to do with a simple request, “Can you prescribe him with Percocet now?”

Ms. Cahan:  It goes to whether it’s appropriate for him to be prescribing it because if it’s a medication he’s not taken before, it could have adverse health effects. And it goes to his understanding and why he would do anything in terms of prescribing Mr. Jackson any kind of pain medication.

Judge:  Okay. I’m going to sustain the objection. I’m sure there’s something in here you could find where, you know, some — they called — Dr. So and so called, asked for Dr. Sasaki to prescribe Percocet or some type of pain medication to Mr. Jackson, and that’s fine. But all this other stuff about has he ever used it in the past, and how many times, did you ever know about it — I mean, all of that is just — it’s hearsay.

Ms. Cahan:  I’m just looking through to see if there are any other —

Judge:  You two will have to sift through that to find that relevant portion.

Mr. Boyle:  I think your honor’s rulings so far take care of the rest that she was going to argue. For example, the 93-22, which is simply saying what Ms. Rowe said to him, that’s hearsay.

Ms. Cahan:  Okay. We can ask Ms. Rowe about some of these things when she comes — if she comes to testify.

Mr. Boyle:  That’s fine.

Ms. Cahan:  Sorry, your honor. One other I was considering. Then the only other one, your honor, that I wanted to address is on page 127.

Judge:  “Why were –” on page 94, “Why were you speaking to Debbie Rowe?” “I have no idea. She just calls.” “Did she explain why she was calling?” “No.” “So this was the first time Debbie Rowe had called you?” “If it’s in the chart, that’s the first time.

Ms. Cahan:  If your honor would turn to page 126 and 127, there’s three lines on 127, lines 5 to 8, that were excluded. And this is the discussion back and forth about the prescription of Percocet. And it’s generally included at 126, you included — allowed significant portions of that. The portion of 127 is “what was Dr. Klein’s response when you told him you would no longer prescribe more Percocet for Michael Jackson?” answer, “I’ll take care of it.” and I think that that’s a relevant part of the prior testimony that’s been allowed in about, you know, can you please prescribe Percocet, yes, I’ll prescribe it, can you please prescribe some more, yes, I’ll prescribe some more, can you please prescribe again, this is the last time I’m doing it, I’m not doing it anymore. And then the response, I think, is appropriate to include. It’s not for the truth of the ongoing medical care but to understand that Dr. Sasaki was relinquishing the pain medication going forward to the care of other physicians. It’s just those three lines on 127.

Mr. Boyle:  Well, no. Your honor, that’s a hearsay statement. “What was his response?” And then the response was given, an out-of-court statement offered for the truth of the matter asserted. And previously they have the testimony where Sasaki says, “I stopped prescribing Percocet.” That’s the end. Why do we need then a hearsay statement after that to put an exclamation point on it? I don’t understand why —

Judge:  The inference is when Klein says, “I’ll take care of it” — the inference is that Klein is going to prescribe him more, I think.

Mr. Boyle:  Or take care of the pain management.

Ms. Cahan:  Right. Which is not a — it’s not being offered for the fact that he then did take care of pain medication, but just that Dr. Sasaki was relinquishing that part of Michael Jackson’s medical care to somebody else.

Judge:  And isn’t that already in here somewhere?

Mr. Boyle:  Yes.

Judge:  “Did you, in fact, inform both Dr. Klein and Michael Jackson that you would no longer prescribe him Percocet because of the frequency of his requests on August 10, 1993?” “If I wrote it, yes.”

Mr. Boyle:  Right. So that’s — that ends it. Now they want to get something in about Klein. I don’t know why they’re tarnishing Klein. They can bring Klein in to testify.

Ms. Cahan:  It’s not tarnishing Klein, your honor. We’re only offering it to show that Dr. Sasaki didn’t say, “I’m sorry. I’m washing my hands of you. Tough. Good luck with your pain.” he transferred care back to somebody else, and he doesn’t know what happened after that. He was doing what a responsible physician would do, which is not to leave a patient who is in pain without recourse to medical care.

Judge:  Well, okay. The problem is it has an inference — a different type of inference that could be drawn. When he says — Well, okay. You read on, it says, “I’ll take care of it.” “Uh-huh.” “Did you ask him what he meant by that?” “No.” So nobody knows what —

Mr. Boyle:  Just hanging out there.

Ms. Cahan:  He didn’t need to ask him because he understood that it meant Dr. Klein would be handling his pain management going forward.

Judge:  Where does he say that, though?

Ms. Cahan:  There’s testimony throughout about that they were sort of jointly managing the pain. He wasn’t seeing Mr. Jackson directly, and then there came a time when he wasn’t comfortable prescribing more Percocet, and he said, “I’m — you know, I’m essentially turning over Mr. Jackson’s future pain management to you” and Dr. Klein said, “I’ll take care of it.”

Mr. Boyle:  It’s just a hearsay statement that’s unnecessary. There’s no exception, as we’ve talked about. I mean, this is Klein talking to Sasaki for — and it’s clearly not in furtherance of any treatment because Sasaki just said, “I’m out of here.”

Ms. Cahan:  We’re not offering it for the truth of the fact that Dr. Klein then took care of it.

Judge:  It’s being offered for — to show that Sasaki transferred the care?

Ms. Cahan:  Right; that he wasn’t irresponsible in just washing his hands of Michael Jackson, saying, you know, “you’re just going to have to tough it out or you can’t get any pain medication,” or “good luck with that.” he did what’s appropriate, which is to make sure that there was a physician that would take care of Michael going forward. He’d had a major surgery, he was taking quite a lot of pain medications. It would not have been appropriate to just cease all medical care for Mr. Jackson, so he was transferring the care.

Mr. Boyle:  I’m glad they’re so concerned about Dr. Sasaki’s reputation now when they’re also trying to infer that he’s one of Michael Jackson’s buddies at Neverland all in an effort to get drugs.

Ms. Cahan:  Your honor, that is really not a fair characterization of what I’ve said.

Judge:  I sustained this objection, didn’t I?

Mr. Boyle:  Yes, you did, your honor. All of these were sustained and have been reargued here.

Ms. Stebbins:  And I think what Ms. Cahan is saying is that’s the purpose she’s offering it for here.

Judge:  To show the conduct of —

Ms. Cahan:  Dr. Sasaki.

Ms. Stebbins:  That he was passing it off in a responsible manner. It’s not offered for anything about what Dr. Klein did or didn’t do afterwards, which would be offering it for its truth.

Ms. Cahan:  And it’s such a general statement, your honor, “I’ll take care of it.” it’s an acceptance of transfer of care; it’s not, you know, “I’m going to give him 300 milligrams of demerol tomorrow.” it’s not anything specific, not something from which anybody would infer a specific conduct or specific continuing care. It’s the idea of the transfer of care in a responsible manner.

Mr. Boyle:  It’s irrelevant.

Ms. Cahan:  There wasn’t a relevance objection to this, your honor.

Mr. Boyle:  There is now. Relevance.

Judge:  All right. I’ll reverse myself on it. But it’s just really pushing it. What’s the next one?

Ms. Cahan:  That was all I had, your honor.

Though AEG’s lawyers insist that Dr. Sasaki did not wash his hands of all he had done to Michael’s scalp it very much looks like he did – the surgery went not quite like he expected, he probably hit the nerve and was forced to give Michael more painkillers than he should but when nothing worked and the scar turned into a neuroma he relinguished the pain management, refused to prescribe more medication and thus washed his hands off his patient.

This is when Klein had to take over and for this I respect him very much – actually he drew fire against himself though it seems that none of it was his doing.

BUT THIS IS NOT ALL

At this point of the nightmare we find that not only the scalp surgery was very painful, but there was absolutely no agreement between Hoefflin and Sasaki about the “recommended techniques”. From the quotes they read from Dr. Sasaki’s deposition it looks like he didn’t recommend the technique used on Michael’s scalp and this is probably why the two surgeons started to shift the blame onto each other.

But even this is not all.

In the course of this sidebar we also learn that there was another surgical procedure done on Michael in the same period and you know when it took place?

It took place on February 16, 1993!

This was a week after Michael’s interview with Oprah and exactly at the time when he was  allegedly courting the Chandlers in order to lure Jordan Chandler into his ‘lair of sin’.

Oh my God, those of us who ever had some acute pain – even if it was only toothache – will understand that all those thoughts about ‘boys’ attributed to Michael at that period of time were nothing but fantasy on the part of these liars! With so much pain Michael could not have anything else on his mind but his never-ending medical troubles and the total disaster that scalp surgery turned into.

However the moment I’ve written it I also recollected that it was in 1993 that the short films for the Dangerous album were released, weren’t they? So being in a condition he was in he still managed to work??

At the sidebar they said that only the description of the procedure done on Jackson by Dr. Sasaki took 4 pages:

Mr. Boyle:  I’ll talk to Ms. Cahan about the Michael was a good father stuff. But, your honor, on page 31, there’s — 31, you sustained an objection. The stated grounds were unduly prejudicial, undue consumption of time. What 31 through 34 is is the description of the procedure that Dr. Sasaki did on Mr. Jackson, and so we think that’s totally within the scope because they’re designating Sasaki for his treatment of Mr. Jackson, and that it was a very painful procedure.
Judge:  I thought this was a different procedure.

Mr. Boyle:  No. This is the description of the one that was actually done.

Judge:  I thought he said, “This is not the one that I did.”

Mr. Boyle:  I don’t think so. I tried to designate the one that was actually done.

Judge:  Because he talks about two different procedures, so I had the impression this was the one that he didn’t do. But —

Mr. Boyle:  You’re right that he does do that. But this is the one that I think ultimately was decided on and was done. And that comes out later in the designation.

Ms. Cahan:  He says, “But this was not the technique that I recommended.”Page 33, line 2.

Mr. Boyle:  Then he goes on and described this technique.

Ms. Cahan:  He’s talking about Dr. Hoefflin at the bottom of that page — what Dr. Hoefflin thought, which is hearsay. If we want to live by plaintiffs’ interpretation of hearsay, this is about this meeting of the minds between Dr. Sasaki and Dr. Hoefflin and going back and forth about which of these surgical procedures would be more appropriate for Mr. Jackson.I don’t know why that would come in if the statements about Dr. Hoefflin and Dr. Sasaki conferring about Michael’s treatment on a going-forward basis were disallowed.
Judge:  “Well, so what technique did you ultimately use for Michael Jackson’s scalp surgery?” isn’t that in? That’s fine. But the one before it which talks about, “this is the procedure I used on jessica lapure, that’s not the one I used for Michael Jackson, that’s not the one I recommended,” why are we going to discuss that one?

Mr. Boyle:  I agree, your honor. I was going to direct your attention to 35, line 13. “and all these steps that you have just outlined occurred during the surgery on Michael Jackson on February 16? “that’s correct.” that’s all. So we can go back and pick out the ones — that’s all I meant to do, is whatever was done on the 16th.

Judge:  Right. There’s a combination of something that wasn’t used. My concern is get rid of the one that wasn’t used.

Ms. Cahan:  And your honor correctly allowed the part beginning at page 34, line 3, when he talks about what he actually did use, and that part is all in.

Mr. Boyle: Done. Never mind. I agree with you. You’re right.

Judge:  Okay.

Ms. Cahan:  Thank you, your honor.

Ms. Stebbins:  Did you say 9:30 tomorrow?

Judge:  I did.

Mr. Putnam:  Thank you.

(Court adjourned to Friday, July 26, 2013, at 9:30 am)

Unbelievable. So now it turns out that it wasn’t only March 16th, 1993 but February 16th too, and in fact the whole recess period between the second and third legs of the Dangerous tour was spent by Michael’s doctors on certain procedures on his scalp.

Considering that they started in January 1993 where David Fournier wasgiving his anesthesia it means that all that treatment was going almost non-stop in the first half of 1993.

He might have probably even had a technical reason for it – dancing with a hairpiece on his head was terribly uncomfortable and potentially exremely embarrassing, and this is probably why it was so urgent a matter for Michael to restore his hair in the time remaining before the last leg of the tour.

They started early to be able to finish before the tour resumed. As David Fournier testified the first procedure was sometime in January 1993, then came the surgery on February 16, 1993 and the next job, a big and very painful one, took place on March 16, 1993 all of which was followed by  a good deal of painkillers prescribed by different doctors.

From Karen Faye’s testimony we also know that just on the eve of the third leg of the tour Michael had a balloon removed from his scalp which adds another procedure done to Michael, probably sometime in August 1993.

And the drug specialist Dr. Schnoll testified that during one of those surgeries Michael formed a neuroma which gave him acute pain similar to that of a lightning bolt.

NEUROMA

Let me remind you what Dr. Schnoll said in his testimony about Dr. Sasaki and what the whole thing resulted in for Michael Jackson. For those of you who missed the picture of the pain neuroma is associated with I’m posting it here again from the respective medical site:

Q. Prior to the Dangerous tour, in the very beginning of it, did he have scalp surgery?

A. Yes.

Q. And what kind of surgery — tell the jury a little bit about what that surgery was for.

A. Well, that surgery was to repair the damage to his scalp. There was some contractions, and so they inserted a balloon under the scalp to stretch the scalp back to a normal configuration and remove the scar tissue.

Q. And did you — based on your review of the records, your knowledge of this condition, is this a painful condition?

A. Yes. And in addition, I think — I might not pronounce it properly — Dr. Sasaki reported he had neuroma formation at the time.

Q. Tell the jury what a neuroma is.

A. A neuroma is like a scar that forms on a nerve. When a nerve is damaged — just if your skin is cut, and you form a scar on your skin, if you have damage to a nerve, you can have a scar form, and that’s a neuroma. And that is excitable tissue, just like the nerves. And so it can be firing, just as the nerve does, but it fires in an abnormal way. And so that can be very painful and disconcerting to the person who has that neuroma. And it’s often sort of like a burning kind of pain. I guess the best example would be, I think most people have fallen asleep on their arm in a funny position, and you wake up and have that tingling and everything. Well, that’s what it can be like, but it’s persistent. It doesn’t go away. And also it can be a sharp shooting kind of pain at the same time. So it’s very uncomfortable and one of the most difficult kinds of pain to treat.

This is what the severe pain from neuroma looks like - it is like a lightning suddenly striking the nerves. And this NEVER STOPS. (Source of animation: http://www.footdoc.ca/www.FootDoc.ca/Website%20Neuromas.htm)

This is what the severe pain from neuroma looks like – it is like a lightning suddenly striking the nerves. And this NEVER STOPS. (Source of animation: http://www.footdoc.ca/www.FootDoc.ca/Website%20Neuromas.htm)

Q. And there are Opioids — appropriate drugs to use to treat a neuroma, this type of pain?

A. They can be used for that, yes.

Q. And in Michael Jackson’s case, were they?

A. Yes.

Q. And, then, this is just prior to beginning the Dangerous tour; is that right?

A. Yes.

Q. And then they went on the Dangerous tour. And did you review the testimony of Dr. Finkelstein?

A. Yes.

Q. And doctor — and based on that testimony, did you have an opinion as to whether Michael Jackson was receiving opioid drugs during that period of time?

A. Yes.

Q. During the Dangerous tour?

A. Yes.

Q. And is it following that time that he went into — he publicly announced that he felt he had a problem with these drugs and wanted to become free of them?

A. Yes.

Q. Based upon your review of the medical literature, the charts, the depositions, the investigation, do you have an opinion as to whether the evidence establishes that Michael Jackson was a drug addict?

A. Yes, I do have an opinion.

Q. What is the opinion?

A. The opinion: I don’t know if he was an addict.

Q. When you say you don’t know, what do you mean by that?

A. Well, I haven’t seen any evidence that would give me the information that would allow me to make a diagnosis of addiction.

Q. Is there evidence that would allow you to make a diagnosis of his being drug dependent at some period of time?

A. Yes.

Q. What evidence is lacking for considering him to be a drug addict?

A. It would be taking drugs when not prescribed by a medical professional; taking larger amounts that were prescribed; drug-seeking behavior; taking drugs that were not — were not prescribed for him.Those kinds of behaviors.

Q. And when you talk about “drug-seeking behavior,” does that have a very special meaning for a physician who is an addiction specialist?

A. Yes.

Q. And what is drug-seeking behavior? Suppose I have a headache, and I go to the doctor, and I say,”give me a drug.” Is that drug-seeking behavior?

A. That could be drug-seeking behavior.

Q. Is that the kind of drug-seeking behavior that is an addict’s drug-seeking behavior?

A. No.

Q. Okay. What is the difference?

A. If you’re seeking a drug to treat a legitimate medical problem, that’s drug-seeking behavior, but it’s not inappropriate and not part of addiction. However, if you’re seeking drugs outside of a medical need, that drug-seeking behavior is inappropriate and can be part of addiction.

Q. And in Michael Jackson’s case, was there evidence that Michael Jackson had Demerol for treatmentof his back pain?

A. Yes.

Q. Is there evidence that he had – that he got Demerol for treatment of his scalp pain?

A. Yes.

Q. Is there evidence that he got treatment for his — for his dermatologic condition where he was being treated by a dermatologist to get ready for these tours?

A. Yes.

Q. And are all of those — the use of Demerol, can Demerol be an appropriate agent to use under those circumstances at that period of time?

A. Yes.

Q. Was there any evidence that you saw that he was engaged in that kind of drug-seeking behavior that you described?

A. Which type are you referring to?

Q. The addiction type of drug-seeking behavior.

A. No.

Q. So that the — you mentioned that he did from time to time have these dependencies, these two periods of time where he went and sought treatment?

A. Yes.

Q. Was that the nature of his drug problem? That he would sometimes get dependent?

A. Yes.

UNCOMFORTABLE SCIENTIFIC FACT

I know that my next statement will be terribly unpopular with Michael’s fans but I will still allow myself to make this point because it is a scientific fact though a very uncomfortable one.

Opioids are universally known to dull the sex drive, so since they were given to Michael to help him cope with the excruciating pain all those experiments on his scalp were giving him, calling Michael asexual at that moment would be appropriate and even medically correct.

It does not mean that the opiates fully killed his sex drive – no, nothing of the kind. All it means that it was greatly diminished as the most common effect of opiates is dulling human libido. It simply could not be any different for him at that very moment, and does not mean that Michael turned “less sexy” – no, he was simply not thinking about that side of life because all patients who are given opiates do not think of it either.

Even our big ‘friend’ and real specialist on boys Victor Gutierrez made a learned observation in his book that there is a big difference between a suppressed desire and having no desire at all:

“There had been speculation about Jackson’s sex life for years. Stories about him being homosexual or asexual had been heard worldwide . According to psychiatrists, asexuality means that a person doesn’t have sex because they don’t desire it. Asexuality is a rare occurrence — not being sexually active is quite a bit different from not thinking about it at all.

And not thinking about it at all is actually what must have been happening to Michael at that very difficult period of his life.

Though asexuality is actually a very rare occurrencefor patients taking opiate painkillers this situation is standard. The asexual effect of opiates is described in numerous books, scientific articles and by patients themselves – and though opiates depress the sexual desire forutunately they do not damage the sexual function:

“The study found that decreased libido in male heroin users was due to a suppression of the luteinizing hormone (LH) from the pituitary gland, which was then followed by a drop in plasma testosterone levels.” http://www.opiates.com/newsletters/link-between-opiate-dependency-libido.html

My critics will probably be happy to hear that anti-opioid Narcan implants (or whatever their name is) like the one given to Michael by Dr. Farshchian increasingly improve this sad condition (sorry for the details provided by the next source):

Early clinical studies suggested that opiates may interfere with sex hormone secretion.” Van Ahlen et al found “early-morning erections increased significantly under naltrexone therapy”. Brennemann et al concluded “treatment with naltrexone significantly raises the rate of spontaneous early morning erections when compared to controls.” In chronic pain patients receiving opiate therapy, Finch et al found “Men and both premenopausal and postmenopausal women had evidence of hypogonadism”, and Paice et al cited “loss of libido” as a common side effect of such therapy, concluding “Patients should be queried regarding sexual function and should be cautioned regarding the possibility of these adverse effects prior to initiating spinal opioids. Supplemental testosterone should be considered to treat this dysfunction.”

In human subjects opiate therapy or abuse is widely associated with loss of libido (sex drive. Given the documented effects on libido of opiate agonists, a rebound effect of enhanced sexual arousal during abstinence or upon administration of opiate antagonists would normally be expected.

http://www.idmu.co.uk/oldsite/opiatesex.htm

I hope you understand that by the “rebound effect of enhanced sexual arousal after administration of opiate antagonists” or a simple stop of using opiates, the scientists mean a sharp increase in a male’s sex drive which in the case of Michael Jackson was demonstrated by his immediate marriage to Lisa Marie Presley as soon as his Demerol dependency was over and her following him for four years all over the world even after their divorce.

Anyone interested can read about both effects in this forum: http://www.drugs-forum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=184812#ixzz2YuShXI8k while I would like to return to the Chandlers.

JORDAN CHANDLER’S HUMOR

Now that we know that the whole period of winter/spring 1993 was almost a non-stop scalp surgery for Michael Jackson I see Michael’s relationship with the Chandlers in a somewhat different light.

I can easily imagine that Michael had so much pain to cope with at the time that all he sought for in the rare moments of comfort and ease from the pain was some innocent fun and an extra laugh. He also probably needed someone to lean on and the Chandlers family could very well look like the best candidate for it. June was glamorous, charming and hospitable – she invited Michael to her home and he even stayed there for 30 days if we are to believe these liars. She made him cosy and comfortable there, cooked them dinner, and all this could have spinned his head into thinking that she and her family could make his perfect life companion.

As to Michael’s friendship with Jordan it was most probably based on one trait of Jordan’s character which up till now no one has really paid attention to. Victor Gutierrez wrote that his father used to admire his son’s sense of humor and was allegedly told by Evan that Michael was attached to Jordan because he constantly made him laugh.

Well, a good laugh was what Michael needed most during that torturous period of his life and doesn’t this perfectly explain why Jordan indeed turned into Michael’s best friend at that time? See this piece from VG’s otherwise totally disgusting book:

Jordie is intelligent and Michael has great respect for bright people. My son danced well and they had great fun showing each other their moves. Jordie is also creative, and Michael was convinced that he was going to be one of the greatest film directors of all time.”

Evan knew that Jackson’s obsession for Jordie was due to these qualities, but he further knew that there was one quality in particular that made the most famous person in the world want to be with his son. According to Evan, that quality was Jordie’s sense of humor. “On many occasions, I thought that Michael was never so happy as when Jordie made him laugh, occasionally at the expense of Michael. I remember very well one time at my house Jordie made Michael laugh so hard that his makeup began to smear. I thought that Michael wanted to be like Jordie for his great sense of humor.”

.. People close to Jordie are familiar with his sense of humor and how uncontrollable it is. He at times makes fun of whoever he is with, but does it with such a style that the person is not insulted, and ends up laughing at themselves. This works, according to his father, as a defense mechanism against people who get close and try to control him. “It’s a unique talent with which he was born and it’s almost impossible to explain it…”

When I recall what allegations this boy eventually made against Jackson all this talk about Jordan’s “humor” begins to acquire for me a somewhat sinister meaning – after all different people have a different sense of humor and what’s humor for one may be bitter tears for another.

In this connection it is also interesting to read another VG’s story about  Jordan and his father immensely enjoying himself in May 1992 when they were writing a script for the movie “Robin Hood: Men in Tights”.

The bright boy wrote that script full of salacious humor even before he met Michael Jackson, at the age of 12, so it gives us some impression of what Jordan could be like when he became close friends with Michael in the winter of 1993. This was absolutely not a naïve boy we imagine ourselves when we look at those innocent pictures of him – no, it was a 13 year old teenager with a keen sense of humor who liked making laugh of other people according to his own father’s recommendations.

We can even get the idea of his humor from the tentative names he and his father gave to the scripts there were writing. The first script was  “Robin Hood: Men in Tights” which was followed by “James Bunny in Humor Terminal: The Last Laugh,” and then by “The Sleazoids vs. The Schulmbergers.”

Gutierrez’s book says about it:

“In May of 1992, Jordie had not yet turned twelve when he had created the idea for and assisted his father in the writing of the movie “Robin Hood: Men in Tights.” The movie, directed by Mel Brooks, was a satire of the Kevin Costner Robin Hood film “Prince of Thieves.”

Jordie and his father found themselves writing two other screenplays, which they tentatively called “James Bunny in Humor Terminal: The Last Laugh,” and “The Sleazoids vs. The Schulmbergers.” They laughed together as they thought about how wonderful it would be to do this all the time, and on top of it all get paid for it.

“Jordie liked the cinema and the business of cinematography, to which he had been exposed thanks to my new wife Nathalie, who was working in a cinematography production company,” his father said. “I remember that was the first time Jordie spoke of having a profession, and he loved the idea. He made his decision with a lot of enthusiasm: ‘I am going to do something in the movies!’ I was happy.”

Of course, Evan didn’t know what his son was going to be, whether a writer, director or CEO. It didn’t matter to Evan. What mattered was only that his son was making responsible decisions and thinking about his future.

“Here we were, having written one screenplay and now writing two more. We were on our way! That was truly one of the best moments of my life and I savor it until now.”

The Humor Terminal? The Last Laugh? The Sleazoids vs. the Schulmbergers?

Why do these titles make me a little uneasy?

 


Filed under: AEG THE HORRIBLE, Jacksons vs. AEG Tagged: AEG, David Fournier, Farshchian, Hoefflin, Jordan Chandler, Klein, Michael Jackson, Sasaki, Schnoll

News summary of week 15 at the AEG trial. A word about AEG’s strategy

$
0
0

Here is a summary of week 15 at the AEG trial based on the ABC tweets.

Monday August 5, 2013. DAY 62

LaPerruqueOn Monday August 5, 2013 Michael LaPerruque, MJ’s chief of security and a former LAPD deputy sheriff  continued his testimony (the first part was on Thursday August 1).

He is so great a guy in Michael Jackson’s life that needs a separate post, so now I will not say much – just a couple of words:

  • LaPerruque was Michael’s head of security during one of the most difficult periods of his life – in 2001-2004. The year 2001 was a battle for the Invincible album and 2002-2004 were connected with Bashir and Arvizos’ allegations.
  • With his 22,5 years of experience as a policeman LaPerruque says it pointblank that Michael was innocent and if he had ever had a single doubt he would have been the first to put handcuffs on his hands.
  • He said that Michael took the false accusations very hard and he often saw him cry.
  •  Despite approximately 30 times he heard and saw Michael having slurred speech within the 3 years of work for him, he never saw any drugs, never saw any IV stands though he had unrestricted access to his room, had the key and could enter at any time.
  • He also said that the slurred speech could be due to Michael taking sleeping pills for the night, and he made a supposition that on the 15 occasions Michael summoned him to his room at night it looked like he was lonely and simply wanted someone to talk to.
  • LaPerruque’s way of handling Michael’s problems was very gentle and Michael appreciated it very much.
  • He said Michael worked very, very hard to fight his dependency on prescription medication. They never discussed it, but despite that Michael saw it necessary to inform him of the progress he was making in beating the dependency – at some point without a single question asked he reported to LaPerruque that he was clear and determined to stay that way.
  • Their communication was very interesting – they understood each other almost without words. LaPerruque said they went through different times together but he loved Michael very much. When Michael arrived from Ireland and called him to work for him again he dropped a prestigious job with the Los Angeles Times and went back. His second period of work for Michael was 2007 until beginning of 2008. During all this time he never saw Michael under the influence of any medication and never saw Murray.

Here is the very short of what he said on his second day of testimony on Monday, August 5:

Monday August 5, 2013 DAY 62

Hello from the courthouse in downtown LA. Day 62 of Jackson family versus AEG trial — Week 15 — is currently underway.

Michael LaPerruque, Michael Jackson’s former head of security, resumed testifying. Jackson’s atty, Deborah Chang, did the cross examination.

Katherine Jackson is present in court, wearing a long jacket in a green and pink water color print of tulips.

LaPerruque said 2001-2004 were very difficult years for Michael Jackson. They were also very busy years.

MJ was recording “You Rock My World” single and shooting a short film at the Universal Studios when LaPerruque began working for the artist.

Change showed clip of “You Rock My World” with Marlon Brando and Chris Tucker and MJ. The single became part of “Invincible” album.

LaPerruque was present when the song was recorded.

In 2002, LaPerruque said Blanket was born. MJ was very excited about being dad again.

LaPerruque went to New York with MJ to be at the Apolo Theater with President Bill Clinton to encourage people to register to vote.

Chang showed clip of President Clinton introducing MJ to the crowd.

She also showed the 2003 American Bandstand 50th anniversary in Pasadena and MJ’s cameo in “Man In Black 2″ in 2002.

Chang: Did MJ have a good sense of humor, including about himself?

LaPerruque: Yes

Chang asked about MJ passing out in Florida and his children called 911. LaPerruque said he doesn’t know what caused him to go unconscious.

LaPerruque said paramedics are more prepared than him, as former sheriff’s deputy, to assess a patient.

LaPerruque never saw the paramedics report. They did not take the MJ to the hospital.

Chang asked if there was a mention of low blood sugar in the report. Defendant’s attorney objected based on hearsay and judge sustained it.

LaPerruque said it was hot and humid that day in Orlando and he does not know when was the last time MJ ate or drank anything.

The head security never saw drugs in MJ’s room.

I never saw the doctors actually treating Mr. Jackson, LaPerruque said. He said he only took MJ to doctor’s office and would wait outside.

Chang: Did you ever raise concerns to Dr. Farshchian you thought he overprescribed medication?

LaPerruque: Yes

There seemed to have been a social relationship between Dr. Farshchian and Michael Jackson, LaPerruque said.

Chang: From 2001-2004 went through a lot of pain, stress and anxiety?

Objection, vague. Sustained.

LaPerruque was never aware of the kind of treatment necessary to treat MJ’s vitiligo and burned scalp.

In 2007 – 2008 LaPerruque worked back with MJ. He had never heard about Dr. Murray.

Chang: Would it be fair to say that throughout the years you worked for MJ you never saw him overdose?

LaPerruque: Yes

LaPerruque raised his concerns with Dr. Farshchian, Dr. Slavitch in San Francisco and Grace Rwamba.

At one point, LaPerruque and Rwamba had a system to try to stop doctors to overprescribe drugs to MJ.

Chang: You tried to protect Mr. Jackson, right?

LaPerruque: Yes

Chang: Have you ever seen him with terrible case of chills?

LaPerruque: No

Chang: Have you ever seen an alarming weight loss?

LaPerruque: No

Change: Have you ever heard people complain they could see his heart beating through his chest?

LaPerruque: No

Chang: Have you ever seen MJ lost, paranoid?

LaPerruque: No

Chang: Did you ever hear MJ saying that God was talking to him?

LaPerruque: No

Chang asked if LaPerruque saw those symptoms, what would he have done.

I’d have been very concerned and if I thought it was life-threatening I’d have taken him to the hospital, LaPerruque said.

Randy Jackson was by himself when he arrived at Neverland by helicopter. He did have a pilot, though, LaPerruque clarified.

Chang: Did you ever hear Randy Jackson speak about an intervention?

LaPerruque: No.

Chang: Did you ever hear the word intervention that day?

LaPerruque: No.

Chang: Did you ever know there was an intervention?

LaPerruque: No.

After 2004, LaPerruque didn’t see MJ on a day-to-day basis except for 2005 during the criminal trial. He never saw MJ in 2006 and early 2007

MJ was acquitted of all child molestation charges and left the country after the verdict.

Rwamba contacted LaPerruque to go back to work for MJ. He said he wouldn’t have jeopardize his job at the time if he thought MJ was on drugs

LaPerruque never observed any problems in 2007 with MJ being under the influence of prescription drugs.

Chang: Do you have any idea who was in charge of MJ’s finances in 2007?

LaPerruque: Raymon Bain

The head security said he learned Bain became MJ’s manager in 2006. She was the CEO/president of MJJ Productions. She signed his contract.

Chang asked if LaPerruque noticed there was a transition with Bain’s position at the time he wasn’t paid. He said he didn’t know.

LaPerruque said he wasn’t aware of MJ’s worth and/or debt at that point. He received call from Bain said MJ would not be needing security.

LaPerruque said Janet Jackson hired him and other personnel to work at the May 14, 2009 event, which was her parents’ anniversary.

The event took place at Chakra Indian restaurant in Beverly Hills. That was the last time LaPerruque saw MJ, a month prior to his death.

Chang showed picture of MJ on June 2009.

Chang: He did not look anything like this, correct?

LaPerruque: Correct.

Chang: If he had you’d have been alarmed?

LaPerruque: Yes

Chang: Was he a kind and gentle person?

LaPerruque: Yes

The fact that MJ was one of the most famous artists in the world didn’t change his way of being humble, LaPerruque said.

Chang asked if LaPerruque knew MJ gave thousands of dollars to United Way. He said yes.

LaPerruque told the jury there was a time where MJ asked him to go to Toys R Us to buy as many presents he could.

He said MJ wanted to give the toys to the children at the Women Shelter in Hollywood, Florida.

He said MJ spent thousands of dollars there, and MJ decided to decline his appearance because he didn’t want it to become a media circus.

LaPerruque said MJ learned with his mother to give money to the poor.

We went and donated the toys, LaPerruque said.

C: Did she love him?

LaPerruque: Yes

Chang: Based on your observations and the things he told you, did he love his mother?

LP: Yes

LaPerruque described MJ’s relationship with his children as excellent. “It was a very loving relationship,” he said.

LaPerruque: They wanted to be with their father, I think MJ was the happiest when we was with his children.

He said MJ wanted them to really want something and appreciate what they had.

MJ would restrict his children to one present and one present only when they went to a toy store, LaPerruque testified.

MJ’s intention was for the kids to really want something and appreciate what they had, LaPerruque explained.

LaPerruque: Not only that, he pushed them toward educational type of toys that they could’ve learned from.

He wanted to be the best father ever, LaPerruque testified.

One of the things LaPerruque remembers the most about Michael Jackson is the fact that MJ was always kind and gentle with his children.

The 2001-2004 period was the time MJ was trying to quit addiction to drug use, wanted his family away from Neverland, LaPerruque said.

For the parents’ 60th anniversary party, the restaurant was closed for Janet Jackson and the party members.

LaPerruque: In my course of employment with Mr. Jackson we’d have a room for him for down time also called green room.

LaPerruque made sure the room was set for MJ upon arrival. They first saw each other in the main room but talked in the private room.

Chang: A family member come to the ranch on one occasion, right?

LaPerruque: Yes.

Chang: Was MJ always able to perform and complete his functions?

LaPerruque: Yes

Chang: If there was ever a time he could not get up on stage to perform, that would’ve been a concern for you?

LaPerruque: Yes.

LaPerruque is then excused. Eric Briggs returned to the stand to conclude his testimony from last week.

So next comes Eric Briggs again as if we didn’t have enough of him during those many days of his testimony for AEG. I am absolutely unwilling to repeat any more of Briggs’ lies here, so let me explain instead my understanding of where we are with AEG at the moment. All of it will be about MJ’s health and his earning potential which is Briggs is supposed to estimate at the trial.

AEG’S OFFICIAL VERSION is that all the time they observed Michael he was healthy, vigorous and alert, and this why they planned for him 186 shows.

This was Gongaware’s own number used by the Plaintiffs’ expert Erk to estimate Michael’s earning potential (186 shows x $108 ticket price x  number of seats = $1,1 bln  plus the cost of merchandise and endorsement deals. Total: $1,5 bln).

To explain why AEG were planning this outrageous number of shows AEG had to say that Michael was healthy.

February 2009

February 2009

But now that they are in the danger of losing a billion they are keen to prove the opposite – that MJ could not do all those shows, was ill, his life expectancy was short and 186 shows were ruled out and and even 50 shows were under a big question mark.

The reason why they planned 186 shows for so ill a man is that he had a “dark secret”, was an “addict” and the poor AEG did not know and this situation took them completely unawares.

This explains why the AEG bosses officially “never heard” of Michael’s dependency, never knew, never witnessed, never saw and even Gongaware learned of the drugs only from a TV announcement though he went with Michael on the Dangerous tour when the situation was at its worst.

Randy Phillips “didn’t know” either, but staged an intervention for Michael in the middle of June 2009, only “it wasn’t drugs” but the need for some protein cocktails or whatever. How could we even imagine that AEG knew that Michael could be unwell? Didn’t we know that he was perfectly healthy until the day he died?

However my understanding is that in contrast to the sleek and bright AEG’s official version, already in autumn 2008 they knew that Michael was very weak. It was his temporary condition due to a heavy blow delivered to him by Barrack and Tohme and threats that they would be “presiding on a funeral” if he didn’t work and didn’t enter into an agreement with AEG.

AEG and the two other parties in this trio took full advantage of Michael’s then state. They planned 186 shows which were to bring them billions, especially if tickets were sold on the secondary market. 50 shows were only the beginning and they wanted even more and if it were not for Michael who put a stop to their mad sale of tickets in March 2009 by constantly calling Randy and saying “No more shows please, no more shows”, they would have sold 100 or even 200 shows in London alone, leaving Michael to deal with all the consequences of what they did.

March 14, 2009  What can be his weight here?

March 14, 2009
What can be his weight here?

But even when setting those 50 shows they knew that Michael was frail. The picture dated March 14, 2009 does not leave doubt that Michael looked extremely thin and insecure then, and it was impossible for AEG and Tohme not to see it. No, they did see it, but completely neglected it, because the idea was to grab as much as possible leaving Michael to take care of the rest.

However Michael’s condition changed already in April 2009 when due to his incredible willpower, determination to do the concerts, phenomenal perseverance and the great boost of energy he got from his fans he rose from ashes again and overcame the situation.

For him those concerts were for real and he was determined to make them a success. For AEG they were most probably not – they never thought he would make them, hence all those numerous reservations they made in their contract for getting his assets in case of cancellations.

So AEG knew that Michael was in a rather frail state in autumn 2008/winter-spring 2009 but presented him as healthy and vigorous. He wasn’t vigorous but he wasn’t taking any drugs – he was simply depressed and deeply overwhelmed by his financial problems.

But AEG always attributed his frailty only to abusing prescription drugs though now they pretend they didn’t know.

It was impossible not to know of his past dependency. Everyone knew of it as Michael openly declared it even in a song, not to mention his earlier TV announcement in 1993. AEG, Tohme and everyone were sure that the dependency continued, only no one discussed it in the open – officially Michael was in the best of health and AEG still needed a big insurance, and for the insurance Michael was to be clean, fine and strong, both at that moment and for at least 5 years prior to it too.

However now AEG’s own mantra about Michael being perfectly healthy at all times is turning against AEG as they face the danger of paying a billion dollars. Hence their new strategy saying that only recently, from depositions of various doctors they were amazed to learn about his “drug addiction issues”, how “short his life expectancy was” and that “he wouldn’t live a week”. Poor AEG never knew it and this took them completely by surprise!

This is why Briggs is doing his best to say that Michael had only a week to live and would have died without making a dime.

But the reality is totally different. Michael was exceptionally strong and was even unusually healthy for his age of 50 as the autopsy said. And he wasn’t a drug addict – he simply had to go through unimaginable lows in his life and several times found himself on the brink of a complete catastrophe that would have broken any of us.

Any of us but him. He always managed to bounce back to normal due to his incredible willpower, determination to live a healthy way of life, a huge sense of responsibility and love for his children and a great faith in God which helped him rise from ashes even after a nearly fatal blow.

And his life expectancy was long as he had no life-threatening conditions except lack of biological sleep as both the autopsy and medical findings at this trial prove it.

And if it were not for AEG and their openly contemptuos and expoitative attitude towards him he would have done not only 50 but 200 or more concerts if he wanted to. Touring that much he did not want of course, but this is a different story.

What I mean is that if it were not for AEG Michael would have lived to be a hundred. And he was strong and healthy and was no longer dependent on drugs – though AEG thought he was, but never said it and now pretend that their eyes opened to it only five minutes ago.

But if they discovered it only recently let them please explain why they denied help to a totally drug-free person when they clearly saw that he was dying. What if all those symptoms had been a sign of diabetes, for example?

I suggest that we keep in mind all the intricacies of AEG’s chameleonic logic when reading about one more day of Briggs’ testimony on Monday August 5:

Sabrina Strong did the questioning. She asked if Briggs recorded the time worked in this case as it’s customary in the industry.

During the course of my 15 year career, this is the normal course we bill clients, Briggs responded.

Strong asked if the amount he billed had anything to do with his opinions. Briggs said no.

Briggs: I set out to evaluate the reasonable projections based on Mr. Erk’s numbers.

He said he attended Erk’s testimony, gave depositions, did extensive research to come to his conclusions and opinion.

Briggs said the first time he saw Erk’s projections was during Erk’s deposition in March. He was deposed a couple of days later.

Briggs said after his own deposition, he did additional research. He looked into the history of MJ’s tour in the US and overseas.

He also analyzed the history of any artists selling out all the shows.

Briggs said the projection was done based on a solo artist, thus he didn’t analyze MJ as part of Jacksons 5 group.

Briggs said he analyzed Erk’s projection and upon concluding it was speculative, it wasn’t for him to speculate forecast in lots of pages.

Strong asked about Brian Panish inquiring Briggs’ background in audits. “This case does not involve audit dispute,” Briggs responded.

Briggs said Erk submitted specific projection of an entertainment project that MJ would’ve potentially be part of.

What the economics of the project is is what I do everyday, evaluating risks and projecting income, Briggs explained.

Strong showed slide created by Panish. The blue bars is what has been publicly known to have occurred, Briggs said

Strong asked if the green bars are “imaginary tours” result of math problem. “Those are tours that never took place,” Briggs said.

Briggs explained Panish’s math: MJ’s average public multiplied by number of shows by other artists multiplied by Erk’s $108 tix price.

Briggs said Panish used 3 different statistics and multiply them all. “It’s just a math problem,” he said.

Strong: Looking at this, did Mr. Panish compare apples to apples?

Briggs: I don’t think so.

Briggs said 55k people multiplied by 167 shows in AC/DC tour results in over 9 million tickets, doubled what was ever associated with MJ.

Briggs said HIStory tour sold 4.5 million tickets for 82 shows, Bad also sold roughly 4.5 million tickets for 123 shows.

Briggs: Historically, his shows sold 4.5 million tickets, appreciating he sold more albums at that point and was more active.

Strong: Was that the peak of his career?

Briggs: I think so.

Briggs said Erk’s projection is “significantly in excess of MJ’s prior tours & significantly in excess of imaginary tours Panish calculated”

Strong: Could MJ have audience of 13 million on his show?

Briggs: I don’t know how you can be reasonably certain that would’ve happened.

Briggs said Gongaware email communication indicate there was a proposal to go on a worldwide tour on Sept. 26, 2008.

Briggs said there were number of words in the email that indicates to him it was a preliminary plan.

In Sept. 2008, the agreement between MJ and AEG had not been signed yet.

This is clearly in the early stages of a proposal, Briggs said.

Regarding email saying “his gross would approached half a billion dollar,” Briggs said he interprets it to be total ticket sales/merchandise

Erk’s projection was $1.56 billion, he compared.

Email says “Net to Mikey $132 million,” which Briggs explained indicates the amount AEG was expecting to have MJ net.

Briggs said Erk projected roughly $900 million net for MJ.

Briggs: There was no formal plan (for world tour), this is early proposal and Mr. Erk’s projection was entirely speculative.

Regarding shows in Japan and India, Gongaware was planning 4 shows in India. Briggs said Erk projected 60 shows in India.

Gongaware planned 8 shows in Japan plus 1 private for a total of 9 shows, versus Mr. Erk’s projection of 50 shows in Japan, Briggs said.

Briggs said he saw some headlines regarding MJ donating proceeds from a tour to charity. He said he doesn’t know if that ever happened.

Briggs said he relied on Gongaware’s testimony that MJ’s tours lost money or broke even, since the actual amount is normally confidential.

Strong: If he didn’t make money from those tours, would he donate money?

Briggs: If he didn’t make any money there would be no profit for him to donate.

Briggs reviewed Dr. Shimelman’s deposition in this case. The doctor was asked to give his best estimate of MJ’s life expectancy in June 2009

Briggs: He clearly stated that Michael Jackson’s life expectancy was 1 week as of June 2009.

Strong: What other issues did Dr. Shimelman rely upon other than MJ’s use of Propofol?

Briggs: He spoke specifically to the synergy of the drugs MJ was taking and the impact of them on the artist.

Briggs said Dr. Earley and Dr. Levounis also relied upon knowledge of history of his drugs use/manner which he took them for their opinion.

Strong: Did they rely solely on Propofol use?

Briggs: There were testimony of the synergy of the drugs, the interaction of the drugs MJ used

I don’t see how an interest for a world tour makes it reasonably certain it will happen, Briggs said.

He said there was no agreement beyond 50 shows at the time of MJ’s death. [Note: there was no agreement for 50 shows either].

Also, there’s a need to consider MJ’s history of drugs use and canceling shows, and the broad risk in the business.

Briggs said there was significant demand that exceeded expectations for the London show.

It means in London there were many people interested in seeing MJ do what he did best: perform, he explained.

But Briggs testified there was a difference between demand for seeing MJ and a company sponsoring the artist.

He said AEG was not able to secure any endorsement even after the high demand for tickets.

Briggs: It indicates there was a demand, it does not alleviate the health risk, it does not alleviate the cancellation risk.

Tom Barrack testified he did not know about Mr. Jackson’s drug use, Briggs said.

Briggs said he was asked to analyze what we have today and the key factors we know now that we didn’t know back then.

Erk specifically stated he did not take Michael Jackson’s drug use into consideration to form his opinion, Briggs testified.

There’s no reasonable basis for those projections based on the facts we know, Briggs concluded.

Outside the presence of the jury, Putnam told Judge Yvette Palazuelos that Panish threatened Briggs during the break.

Putnam said Panish told Briggs “you’re lucky we’re in court.” “I can’t have my witness threatened, you honor,” Putnam said.

Panish said the events were not quite like that. He told the judge Briggs ran him over, said “this witness ran me over”.

Judge laughed and said “I’d be surprised if anyone can run you over, Mr. Panish.” Panish said he didn’t touch or hit him.

Judge: Mr. Panish, don’t talk to any witness unless you’re talking about this case.

Panish: I didn’t threat him, he’s not afraid, he’d know if I threatened him.

In re-cross, Panish asked if Briggs was put aside to accommodate another witness who had scheduling problems. He said yes.

Panish: Is it fair to say your bills is $700 thousand now?

Briggs: That’s fair to say

Panish: And for 700k your opinion is that MJ would not have earned one dime from working to give to his children?

Briggs: Yes

Panish: In your opinion, it’s speculative MJ’d earn any money working, correct?

Briggs: Any projection of earning is speculative

Panish: You don’t determine what’s relevant in this courtroom, right? “Concerning my opinion, I determine what is relevant,” Briggs said.

Panish asked about Briggs’ interaction with MJ Estate’s lawyer.

I told you there was not a written waiver with the Estate, Briggs explained.

The Estate has different lawyers, they are not represented by Panish’s firm, Briggs said.

He said his understanding is that his partner called the Estate lawyer, Jeryll Cohen, notifying he would testify in this case.

Panish: So that statement under oath was untruthful, sir?

Briggs: That’s not correct, that was my best understanding at the time.

Panish said Briggs testified he asked the Estate for permission to be hired by AEG and testify in this case.

I now understand the substance of the call was not an authorization but a call of notification, Briggs explained.

There was a call to notify the Estate not to receive authorization from the Estate, Briggs said.

Panish: Is your testimony you called Ms. Cohen prior to signing the engagement letter with AEG’s attorneys?

Briggs: That’s not correct.

I never called Ms. Cohen to get authorization to testify, Briggs said. “No one called for authorization, they called for notification.”

Briggs said his partner, Roy Salter, called Hoffman’s company to notify Briggs was going to testify in this case.

Panish: And you are as sure of that as everything you testify to in this case, correct?

Briggs: Yes

Briggs said the general counsel at FTI took care of the issue.

Panish: Are you concerned about giving false testimony under oath?

Briggs: Of course I’m concerned of giving false testimony under oath!

There was no authorization sought, there was a notification to the Estate, Briggs said.

Briggs said he doesn’t have any record of speaking with Salter about it.

He said his best recollection is that it happened a few days prior to the firm’s engagement with AEG’s counsels.

Panish showed Briggs’ opinion. “This is the basis of my opinion that it’s speculative that the UK shows would be completed,” Briggs said.

One basis is the health of MJ, Briggs said. “As part of that basis, life expectancy is key.”

Panish: Did you write anything up about the Coroner’s testimony?

Briggs: I did not.

Panish asked if Coroner’s testified about life expectancy. “I understand the Coroner was not deposed,” Briggs said.

Therefore, he said he could not note anything about it in his notes. “I did not make reference of autopsy report,” Briggs explained.

Panish asked how many projects MJ did after the “Dangerous” tour. Briggs said it depended on how the work was classified.

Panish named several projects MJ worked, such as Luciano Pavarotti Benefit for the Children, “United We Stand” 911 benefit.

He also performed in NY with Bill Clinton, participated in movies “Man in Black 2″ and “Miss Castaway,” Thriller 25 album re-released.

Briggs knew about some of the projects, not all. He said “Thriller 25″ was extremely successful.

Panish: Do you know he recorded 100 new songs between 2001 and 2008 for new release?

Briggs: I did not know that.

Just to be clear, I’m giving an opinion to future earning, not about his albums, Briggs said.

Briggs explained if they had a plan, that would be in support of the O2 tour, as well as detailed budget and financing.

Financing appeared to be in place for O2 concerts, yes, Briggs said. There was also a director and approximately $34 million investment.

O2 arena’s capacity for MJ show is 15,000 average. “The contract contemplated a possibility for a world tour,” Briggs opined.

Territory is a define term in the contract, Briggs said. “Territory is defined as the world.”

Panish: Is this evidence a world tour was contemplated by MJ and AEG Live?

Briggs: Yes, this is evidence a world tour was contemplated.

Panish showed email Kathy Jorrie wrote: Nonetheless, I recommend that a background check be performed through a private investigator and/or at a minimum, that someone at AEG Live meet with Michael Jackson to make sure he understands that we are entering into a tour agreement with him that will require him to perform a worldwide tour…

Panish: You told us MJ’s drug use makes it speculative that he could do a worldwide tour and earn a dime?

Briggs: His drug use was a factor and basis for my opinion.

Briggs said endorsement companies have a long memory about the people they want to associate themselves with.

Panish asked if endorsement companies had a long-lasting memory about Tiger Wood. Briggs said athletes and very different from artists.

Panish: Tell us every endorsement deal you remember you reviewed as part of your experience.

Briggs said he doesn’t remember reviewing specific contracts for endorsement, need moment to think.

The expert did say he reviewed 50 Cent and Vitamin Water endorsement deal.

Briggs said he’s reluctant to disclose values, but knows 50 Cent received equity in the company.

Panish: It was more than $100 million, wasn’t sir?

Briggs: Not at the time, he entered into a deal thought to be much less than that.

Briggs said the deal was around $10 million, but he doesn’t recall any cash transaction. Today the deal is said to be valued $100 million.

Briggs wrote in his note:

Paul McCartney — $5 million Lexus

Rolling Stones — $10 million Citibank

Others in the $1-2 million range

Panish asked Briggs where that information came from. Briggs said he doesn’t recall, can’t give specifics.

Regarding the 4 year plan that included Australia tour, Briggs said: “I do not see how demand addresses a one week life expectancy.”

Panish addressed the judge: Your honor, I ask that Mr. Putnam stop making comments.

Judge: I already said I’m not going to babysit the two of you. Jury didn’t laugh this time around.

Panish discussed with Briggs, extensively, the chart and how Erk arrived at those numbers.

Strong, in re-re-re-direct: Did you ever dispute a world tour was contemplated?

Briggs: I did not.

He said he took that in consideration, but it didn’t alleviate some of the concerns he had.

Briggs said the general counsel of his firm cleared that there was no conflict of interest for him to testify in this case.

The Estate has not objected to my involvement in this case, Briggs said.

Panish, in re-re-re-cross: You’re sure as anything else you testified that your company contacted the Estate before signing the agreement?

Briggs: That’s correct.

Briggs is excused and judge gave a break in the afternoon session.

Isn’t it interesting to see how the story of the Estate “giving permission to testify for AEG” turned into the story of Briggs just “notifying” them about it?

May 8, 2009 Timm Woolley's email to Murray 1The same day the jury saw the video deposition of Tim Woolley. In all his emails to Murray he assured him that the work on the contract started on May 8th 2009 though Kathy Jorrie (who will testify the next day) will say that she started only on June 15th. Why did AEG drag their feet for a month and a half I wonder?

AEG’s attorneys played video deposition of Timm Wooley, a financial advisor who worked on “This Is It.” He’s been an advisor for 20 years.

Kevin Boyle, Jacksons’ attorney, did the questioning. Boyle asked if he thought it was weird MJ wanted a doctor on tour.

It was his choice, whether it was usual or not usual was not my place to decide, Wooley responded.

I think I wanted to get Mr. Murray off my back, Wooley said regarding emails he wrote to Murray. He said the intention was to put him off.

Wooley said Prince had done some shows in O2, he acted as financial consultant. Gongaware contacted Wooley to work in the “This It It” tour.

Wooley got an email in early 2009. He said Gongaware wanted him as his deputy to work on projections, payables, payroll, petty cash. Deputed for him in matters financial, when delegated to me, Wooley explained.

Wooley said he did not do the negotiations with Dr. Murray. He said negotiations is a broad term, may have done some work.

He said he gathered information on behalf of MJ, his doctor that the artist wanted to contract, Wooley explained.

Wooley said Gongaware told him MJ wanted to hire Conrad Murray, whom he said he later found out was MJ’s primary physician.

Boyle: Did you ask why MJ wanted a personal physician on tour?

Wooley: Not mine to ask.

Wooley remembers calling Murray once in early May to check if he needed anything that he would get the info to the appropriate people.

One email says: “Need for one venue-based, one home-based extracorporeal CPR units.”

Wooley said he suggested Dr. Murray to get CPR units. He said he was working for the tour, called the doctor on behalf of Michael Jackson.

Boyle: Did you take any orders from MJ?

Wooley: No

I enumerated that item as an item he might wanted to have, Wooley said about the CPR, or defibrillation, units.

He said in his community there was installation of CPR units in some houses and he thought of asking.

Boyle asked if Wooley lived in a retirement home. He said he’s not retired.

Boyle: Did you have any reason to believe MJ could have suffer a heart attack?

Wooley: None

I was gathering information to compose projections and budget, Wooley testified.

Boyle: Did you discuss Dr. Murray giving injection of Propofol to MJ?

Wooley: No

Wooley never discussed the need for IV lines and needles. He said the doctor told him he may needed an assistant.

Wooley said they did not discuss need for nurse or doctor. “We didn’t talk about his services,” Wooley said.

Boyle showed an email Wooley sent to Dr. Murray on May 14, 2009. It says he was following up with Dr. Murray.

Email from Murray on May 15, 2009: As for good faith with my client… I’m sure you’re aware my services are already fully engaged with MJ.

Wooley doesn’t remember the email and doesn’t know what “my services are already fully engaged” meant.

I was attempting to be helpful, Wooley explained. He said he was not aware that Dr. Murray was treating MJ on behalf of AEG.

Email from Dr. Murray :D ear Timm, I gather from your last email my contract is taking a little more time to get than usual…

Email said his services are being done in good faith and asked, in reciprocity of good faith, to have payment for May deposited.

I didn’t have any agreement with Dr. Murray, Wooley said.

Boyle: Did AEG have an agreement?

Wooley: Never. There was never a completed agreement between Dr. Murray and AEG.

Wooley said he had no idea if AEG would pay Dr. Murray for May. He said he never read the contract.

Wooley testified he would’ve told Dr. Murray he would not get paid until the contract is completed.

Wooley said he does not recall specifically receiving an email from Dr. Murray with his bank account info and request for $150k payment.

Wooley said he does not remember if he asked Dr. Murray his bank account number.

The advisor said he was gathering the information with Dr. Murray to be put in a contract.

Email on May 28 from Wooley to Murray said doctor’s contract was delayed because it was rare event physician engaged to go on tour.

Yes, as far as I know, I was telling the truth, Wooley said. “I was putting him off.”

Boyle wanted to know if Wooley asked why they were taking the doctor along.

Did I not say it was Mr. Jackson’s request and it was not my place to question that? Wooley responded.

Wooley said Dr. Murray came from Vegas and MJ was living in Vegas for a period of time.

Wooley wrote email that AEG policy dictates you can only pay someone with fully executed contract. He said he knows it based on his experience

Wooley testified he forwarded to Dr. Murray the contract Kathy Jorrie sent him. He said he did not read it.

Boyle showed Wooley a chain of emails between him and Kathy Jorrie. He said he did not recall the chain specifically.

In an email, Wooley apologized for the delay in getting the contract to Murray, said once contract is executed AEG could pay May/June salary

There wouldn’t be any payment until a full agreement, Wooley said.

Wooley said he remembers Dr. Murray had MJ’s medical record from 2006 to 2009. It was needed for purposes of securing insurance.

Wooley testified Dr. Murray seemed to be the person to have the records, which was needed for underwriter of insurance.

Wooley said they would not have needed CPR units until they went to the UK. He did not quote any prices for the machine.

extracorporeal CPR unit in use

extracorporeal CPR unit in use

Wooley expressed he never discussed with Dr. Murray what kind of treatment he would be giving MJ.

Wooley testified he never saw any of the drafts of the contract between Dr. Murray and AEG, only forwarded them.

Brigitte Segal was MJ’s personal tour manager, Wooley said.

Wooley was not asked to run a background check on Dr. Murray and doesn’t know if it was ever requested by anyone.

Wooley said Dr. Murray asked for a “locum,” a British medical term for a person who stands by in place of a physician.

That ended Wooley’s deposition. Judge adjourned session until tomorrow morning. Attorneys are ordered at 9:30 am PT, jury at 9:45 am PT.

Attorneys and judge will discuss the video deposition of Joseph Marcus, the Neverland Ranch manager. Kathy Jorrie will testify next.

We hope to see you all tomorrow for full coverage of the trial. For the latest, watch @ABC7 and http://www.abc7.com . Good night everybody

Before getting down to Tuesday please note that Murray asked for two “extracorporeal” CPR units which are absolutely not the portable CPR unit they finally agreed to. An extracorporeal CPR unit is a highly sophisticated piece of equipment and a very costly one at that.

So I doubt it very much that in the almost two months of negotiating Murray’s contract they never discussed why Murray asked for that equipment and therefore what kind of treatment he would be giving MJ. In fact anyone looking at the price and sophistication of that piece will exclaim in surprise – what do you need an extracorporeal CPR for?

Tuesday August 6, DAY 63

responsibilites of MurrayTo Kathy Jorrie, the lawyer who drafted the contract between AEG and Conrad Murray I have several questions:

1)     Why did it take her approximately 40 days to make the first draft of the contract though Timm Wooley promised to start working on the contract already on May 8th, 2009?

2)     Why did she first specify June 24 as the effective date of the contract and only when Murray noticed it changed it to May 1st? Was she trying to deceive Murray? After all payment was to start only from the date of executing the contract (when all parties were to sign it). So why was she so keen on saving up Michael’s money? Or was it AEG’s money that she was economizing?

3)     She says she forgot to replace “Producer” with Aritist” in the crucial phrase of Murray’s contract saying that “The doctor is to perform services reasonably requested by Producer”. But Murray specially requested her to change it, so why didn’t she?

services approved by the producer4)     And why did another paragraph (3.3) say that they were to supply the equipment to assist Murray to provide the services approved by the Producer? So AEG were supposed not only to request but also to approve his services, and this is how big AEG’s power over Murray was?

5)     Why didn’t she send Murray’s contract to MJ’s representatives? Especially considering the fact that Branca asked Randy Phillips to send him every paper to be signed by MJ and not allow him to sign anything without his approval?

6)     Has Kathy Jorrie ever read Tohme saying in Sullivan’s book that Conrad Murray’s salary was AEG’s responsibility and this is what Michael insisted on and AEG even agreed to it? Sullivan can be trusted in providing us this information – he repeated without any discrimination or criticism everybody else’s stories, so we can perfectly rely on Sullivan here – retelling the story the way it was told to him is his biggest and most valuable asset.

You will not find truthful replies from Jorrie to any of the above questions so you won’t lose anything if you skip her long testimony of polished lies and go over direct to Wednesday. Her testimony is provided here only for the record:

Tuesday August 6, 2013

Hello from the courthouse in downtwon LA. Day 63 of Jackson family vs AEG trial, Week 15, underway.

Katherine Jackson is present in court, wearing a purple jacket with black flowers on it.

Judge Yvette Palazuelos and attorneys spent more than 1 hour and 15 mins this morning discussing boundaries for next witness, Kathy Jorrie.

Jorrie is a lawyer who works for AEG and put together Murray’s contract. Both sides argued extensively regarding attorney-client privilege.

Jury entered the courtroom at 11:09 am PT. AEG called Kathleen Ann Jorrie, an attorney who works at a private firm and does work for AEG.

Attorney Jessica Stebbins Bina did direct examination.

Jorrie said she’s in the business for 20 years. She did undergraduate at UCLA and got JD degree at Hastings College of Law.

Jorrie is a partner at a law firm, works in Los Angeles. Her firm is an international company with close to 80 attorneys in the LA office.

Jorrie said she splits her work between being a trial litigator and transactional work, one who deals with contracts.

The focus of her clients has been the entertainment business. Her clients involve motion pictures studios, television content producers.

She also works with movie distributors, satellite providers, live entertainment promoters, etc.

Jorrie said she works with AEG Live and AEG in their live entertainment business. She deals with Shawn Trell (who testified earlier on.)

The attorney said she worked on more than 75 tour agreements with prominent artists, Rolling Stones, Bon Jovi, Britney Spears, Kanye West.

Over the years, Jorrie said Trell asked her to help negotiate agreements with vendors. She said she normally works on big agreements.

Jorrie worked on third party agreements for “This Is It” tour. She worked on deal with Bravado for merchandising, negotiated stage.

Jorrie also did the contract for Dr. Conrad Murray that Michael Jackson requested.

I drafted the version that was sent to Mr. Wooley, who provided my draft agreement to Dr. Murray, Jorrie explained.

Jorrie said, to her best recollection, she received a call from Timm Wooley to help prepare an agreement for Dr. Murray in late May of 2009.

The attorney never talked to Murray before drawing the first draft. Initial draft was based on basic terms Wooley provided her, Jorrie said.

Jorrie: He told me that MJ had agreed to pay $150,000 per month for Dr. Murray, that Dr. Murray was MJ’s personal physician.

In addition to providing medical care, Dr. Murray would be on call for emergencies, Jorrie explained.

Jorrie said nurse would be provided as selected by Dr. Murray and paid for by AEG Live. The doctor would have the air fare to/from London.

Also, the doctor and family would be provided housing in London.

Wooley said Dr. Murray wanted personal insurance in case he got sick. The payment to commence as of May 1, 2009.

Jorrie said he did not say what ended point would be. She put all the terms in the first draft agreement, but most details were missing.

Jorrie said she included other important terms:
– End date to be end of O2 arena in Sept. 2009
– Termination provision
– Indemnity

Jorrie said she sent the draft to Wooley and if he was happy with it to forward it to Dr. Murray.

Jorrie said there were 2 more drafts after the first. She said she looked at other AEG agreement contracts she had prepared AEG as template.

Jorrie explained she worked off the base contract and included a bunch of other provisions to the agreement.

Jorrie said the “Scope of Services” was a mix between what Wooley requested and her additions.

At Wooley’s request, she included that Dr. Murray was MJ’s personal physician and had been for some time.

Jorrie added “services to be provided by Dr. Murray administer those services professionally and greatest degree of care expected.”

The attorney said Wooley told her that Michael Jackson had asked Dr. Murray to go on tour with him and that MJ would pay for it.

Jorrie said she included in the contract “Artist Consent,” saying the contract was not enforceable unless and until MJ signed the agreement.

She said she added a line for MJ’s signature at the end of the document.

Jorrie said this provision was included in the 1st draft. She said Murray had no comment regarding the first 2 provisions of the contract.

Jorrie said Recital A, Paragraph 9 and wording above MJ’s signature explained Dr. Murray was hired on behalf of Michael Jackson.

Jorrie explained the Termination provision that allowed AEG to terminate the contract with Dr. Murray.

Termination:

1- in event there was a default of the agreement by the doctor

2- in the event series of concerts postponed or canceled

3- if artist decided he no longer wanted or needed Murray

4- failed to maintain all licenses and approval to practice medicine

5- failed to submit written evidence that he was legally authorized to practice medicine in US

6- no later than July 3rd, evidence he was allowed to practice medicine in the UK

Jorrie said she believes she sent the email to Wooley/Dr. Murray on June 15. She testified she never received any documents from Dr. Murray.

Jorrie said Murray called her on 6/18/09:
1- Murray and MJ relationship
2- Some of changes he wanted made
3- Couple of questions Jorrie had

The attorney said the conversation about Dr. Murray and MJ relationship did not result in any change to the contract.

Jorrie: The changes he mentioned to me during the call, he wanted his company GCA Holdings to be the contracting party instead of him.

Dr. Murray also wanted to change provision where Jorrie referred to nurse.

Jorrie explained Dr. Murray said he wanted flexibility to have a “qualified assistant medical person,” who could be another physician.

Another change requested was to provision 7.7 regarding termination, Jorrie said.

Jorrie: He also let me know he was license to practice medicine in 4 states and gave me the states.

Jorrie: Dr. Murray told me he preferred to have GCA Holding as contracting party and he as employee of the company.

Jorrie said that it was okay but she wanted Dr. Murray on the contract also.

Jorrie: I asked why you needed another physician as opposed to a nurse. He told me in case he was unavailable or tired.

Jorrie said Dr. Murray wanted to have the flexibility to have someone on stand by, payable for by AEG Live.

Jorrie said ultimately she made the changes. Dr. Murray was the one who would identify who this medical person would be, but never did.

The attorney said Dr. Murray told her he was licensed to practice medicine in California, Nevada, Texas and Hawaii.

The first payment was to be no later than 5 days after contracted was fully signed by everybody, including Michael Jackson.

Dr. Murray wanted to modify section 7.7, termination either because MJ decided he didn’t want him anymore or the concert canceled.

As a result, he would not want to be in a position he would have to refund any part of his payment.

Payment was due to him on the 15th of the month to cover from 1st-30th. If he were terminated on the 20th, he wanted to keep full payment.

Jorrie: My response: Dr. Murray, $150,000/month is a lot of money!

Jorrie said Dr. Murray told her he had 4 medical practices making a million dollar a month, and it was not fair to have to return money.

Jorrie: Murray said under no circumstances he was leaving his practice if when terminated he couldn’t keep the whole 150,000 received.

Jorrie explained that provision 7.7 detailed what happened if there was a termination. Dr. Murray asked her to limit that provision.

Jorrie: He had asked to be able to retain the full payment for the month he received.

He thought it would be fair and appropriate due to him leaving his established medical practice, Jorrie explained.

Jorrie said she asked Murray about the CPR machine. The doctor provided a list of equipment he needed to Wooley, who in turn sent to Jorrie.

Jorrie: I asked Dr. Murray, why do you need a CPR machine? He said he needed one in London, MJ puts on a strenuous performance.

Jorrie asked if O2 arena didn’t have one. He said he didn’t want to take risks, wanted one at hand. He also told her it’s customary.

Giving Michael’s age, giving his age, and that he puts on a strenuous performance, he just didn’t want to take a chance, Jorrie said.

Jorrie recalled there was other equipments on the list, normally for dehydration purposes, like saline and catheter.

Contract said “producer to provide medical equipment portable CPR, saline, catheter, needles, gurney and other mutually approved equipment.”

Jorrie: Our conversation concerned London, he said he needed one (CPR machine) in London.

Jorrie said she took the information she got from Dr. Murray, went online and checked it out.

The attorney said she went to the Nevada Secretary of State to check if GCA Holdings, LLC was indeed a valid company.

Jorrie said she checked the medical boards Dr. Murray told her he was licenses and googled the doctor.

Jorrie testified GCA was a proper company and Dr. Murray was the manager of it. She added the address on the contract and Dr. Murray’s title

Jorrie said it was very easy to check the medical licenses. She went on the Medical Board websites and checked his licenses in all.

There was no disciplinary action against Dr. Murray, Jorrie said. She checked in California, Nevada, Texas and Hawaii.

Jorrie testified she did the medical license check on June 18, 2009. She said she sent the draft to Dr. Murray, but the email bounced back.

She then sent email to Wooley asking him to forward the contract to Murray.

Jorrie said she also attached a comparison doc with the redlines marking the changes she made for easier understanding.

Jorrie explained it’s her practice to save doc as “final pdf version.” She said it is a personal indicator that the final version was sent.

The attorney told the jury once the contract is fully executed, she saves it “fully executed.”

Jorrie said she was asked by the general counsel to see if she could ask Dr. Murray for the medical history for insurance purpose.

Dr. Murray said he had told me he had been MJ’s physician for a period of time, Jorrie expressed.

Bina: Did you send this email because you believe Dr. Murray was MJ’s physician?

Jorrie: Yes.

Jorrie asked that if Dr. Murray was not the right doctor to provide records, if he could please direct her to the appropriate physician.

The attorney said Dr. Murray told her he would help. Jorrie explained she had 3 drafts of Dr. Murray’s agreement.

GCA would actually provide the services of Dr. Murray, Jorrie said. The $150k would be paid not to Dr. Murray, but to GCA Holdings.

Jorrie changed Provision 3.4 at the request of Dr. Murray, from nurse to qualified medical person (assistant).

Change in 7.7: If there’s termination, GCA shall have no obligation to refund any portion of any installation due and payable before.

Jorrie said Dr. Murray called her again on June 23, 2009 asking for some more changes.

Jorrie spoke with Randy Phillips on June 19, 2009 on an unrelated matter and Dr. Murray’s subject came up.

It was phone conversation, she relayed Dr. Murray was licensed to practice in 4 states. “I checked out, or confirmed the info,” she said.

Jorrie testified she told Phillips Murray appeared to be very successful in his practice, may have told him about a million dollar a month.

I definitely told him he’s very successful in his practice, Jorrie said. “I confirmed he was licensed to practice in 4 states.”

Jorrie: AEG Live has been a consistent client of mine since 2000. Approximately 300 matters have been opened in 12 years.

First change was the effective date, from June [24] to May 1, 2009, Jorrie said.

Jorrie: He said he was promised that when the agreement was signed he would’ve been paid retroactively to May 1, 2009.

When Bina asked about payment provision, Panish objected to prevent Jorrie from expressing her opinion about the contract.

Judge: I’m going to strike the entire testimony if she keeps interpreting the contract.

Jorrie: He wanted to extend, by about 5 months, his engagement.

End date changed from Sept, 2009 to March, 2010

Jorrie asked if MJ would be paying him even though the tour would be on break. He said yes.

1- Scope of Services — it had language saying perform services reasonably requested by “Producer.”

Jorrie: Murray said we need to change that to Artist, it’s the artist who’s my patient. I said absolutely right, the artist is your patient.

Jorrie said provision 4.1 also says “Perform the Services reasonably requested by Producer.”

Jorrie: I didn’t change it to Artist because Murray didn’t draw my attention to that and I didn’t remember that language was in there twice.

Jorrie said if she had seen it, she would’ve changed it to Artist, not Producer.

Bina asked if on June 23 Jorrie discussed with Dr. Murray to get MJ’s medical history. She said yes.

Jorrie revised the agreement, emailed to Dr. Murray on 6/23/09: saying ‘I have attached a clean pdf version, which is ready for execution.’

Jorrie said she sent 3rd version of the draft to AEG Live. She didn’t send it to MJ or his reps, was not in communication with MJ about it.

Jorrie explained it was never her understanding that MJ’s medical records would have been sent to her but to insurance underwriter.

Jorrie: Late in the evening on June 24, I received a fax with a document signed by Dr. Murray. I forwarded a copy to it to Mr. Trell.

Jorrie said neither Michael Jackson nor AEG signed the contract.

The attorney said she has negotiated with third party vendors before without showing the drafts to the artist.

Jorrie: The reasons is that attorneys for the artist would have the document exactly like they wanted.

Judge: How do you know if you don’t talk to the artist that the agreement is what the artist’s want?

Sometimes we enter in agreements the artists never see, Jorrie told the court.

Jorrie said this is the first third-party vendor agreement she was involved with a medical doctor.

Jorrie sent Dr. Murray the last version on June 23rd, Dr. Murray faxed it back on June 24th.

Jorrie said she didn’t talk to Murray about specific treatment he was giving to MJ. “He didn’t tell me anything he was doing to treat MJ.”

Bina: Did Dr. Murray ever ask you for payment?

Jorrie: Never.

Jorrie explained paragraph 4 of the contract, which detailed the responsibilities of GCA/Dr. Murray.

Jorrie testified she discussed with Dr. Murray the requirement for UK medical license either on June 18 or 23.

Jorrie said July 3, 2009 was the date Dr. Murray was planning to go to London with Michael Jackson.

Bina showed the last page of Dr. Murray’s agreement. Under the signatures, it is dated June 24, 2009.

Jorrie said she put that date since she thought the parties would’ve signed the contract that day.

I do not know if Michael Jackson would’ve signed the agreement, Jorrie testified.

Regarding the reference that AEG hired doctor at request of MJ, Jorrie said she never did this on any other agreement on behalf of AEG.

Because we’re talking about Michael Jackson’s physician, Jorrie explained.

Recap:
June 15th — first draft written, sent to Dr. Murray
June 18th — negotiation with Dr. Murray began, over the phone

June 19th — checked medical license, business standing
June 19th — spoke with Phillips about it

June 23rd – Murray called asking additional changes
June 23rd – third draft sent to Murray
June 24th – Murray signed it and faxed it back

Jorrie emailed Dr. Murray one more time after that related to the insurance for the tour.

In cross examination, Panish asked if Jorrie is an independent witness.

Jorrie: I don’t understand the question, Mr. Panish.

Panish: Are you being paid for the work you’ve done in this case?

Jorrie: I’m not being paid as I sit here today.

Panish asked if her company has received millions and millions of dollars from AEG. She said since 2000, yes.

Panish inquired if Jorrie is friends with Randy Phillips and Paul Gongaware.

I’d like to think all my clients are my friends, Mr. Panish, Jorrie explained. “They are business friends.”

I’m aware that Mr. Gongaware was sued one time, but I want to be absolutely certain, Jorrie said.

Panish: Professionals keep itemization of the work they do, don’t they?

Jorrie said she keeps tabs of the work she does.

Panish asked if Jorrie hires expert witnesses. She said yes. He inquired if professionals keep itemization. She said yes.

Panish: Have you ever paid an expert $700,000?

Jorrie: I have not.

Panish asked if Jorrie brought the contract she used as basis for drafting Dr. Murray’s contract.

Jorrie said she has it in her office. Panish asked to see it, she said she can provide it, redacting the name of the third party.

Jorrie charges AEG $595 per hour. She said she’s not billing AEG for the testimony today.

Panish: How much have you billed AEG related to the “This Is It” project?

Jolie: Work started in October 2008.

Jorrie asked if it included litigation. Panish said yes.

Jorrie: Of all matters related to This Is It?
Panish: Yes. More than 20 million?
J: Of course not
P: 10 million?
J: No
P: 5 million?
J: No

Jorrie said she can have her accounting department put together a spreadsheet with all she has billed AEG.

Panish said Paul Gongaware and John Meglen were sued for stealing the name Concerts West.

Bina objected, saying the lawsuit was dismissed and Panish was trying to tarnish Gongaware and Meglen’s reputation.

Judge: Was the case dismissed?
Panish: Yes
Judge: Then it’s not stealing. Please refrain from using that word. Describe it accurately.

Jorrie: For all of those matters, for 12 years, it would be millions of dollars.

Panish: How many multi-million dollars has your company been paid?

Jorrie: It could be over $5 million for that period of time (since 2000).

Panish: You knew MJ was going on a 3-5 years worldwide tour, correct?

Jorrie: That’s not correct.

Putnam was present when Jorrie spoke with LAPD after Michael Jackson’s death.

Panish: Did you go meet with LAPD and discussed MJ going to go on a worldwide tour?

Jorrie: No, they came to my office, asked questions.

Panish: Did you tell LAPD the that MJ was going on a world tour?

Jorrie: No.

Panish: Did you say European tour was just the beginning and MJ would be making a worldwide tout?
Jorrie: Not that I recall.

That’s not my statement and I don’t recall that, Jorrie testified.

Panish: Did you tell LAPD that MJ was going on a worldwide tour after European leg was over?

Jorrie: No.

Panish: Did Mr. Putnam tell LAPD MJ was going to do a world tour for 3 to 5 years?

Jorrie: Yes. Not like that.

Panish: You denied making that statement?

Panish asked if Detective Schmidt is called to testified and said Jorrie told him about MJ going on a worldwide tour, if that’s a lie.

He would’ve been mistaken, Mr. Panish, Jorrie said. “Because he misunderstood what I was saying about the tour.”.

Jorrie said she did not bill for the time she testified at deposition.

Panish: Did you tell the police department Dr. Murray took in $12 million a year?

I said that he told me that his 4 medical practices brought in more than a million dollars a year, Jorrie said.

Panish: Did you say one million dollar a month?

Jorrie: Dr. Murray had 4 practices, I told one million dollars a year and they added up to 12 million. [Note: Does 1mln times 4 make 12 mln?]

I spoke with him about the tour agreement and how it would work, Jorrie testified.

Judge adjourned session until tomorrow at 9:30 am PT. Jorrie will be back on the stand to resume cross examination.

Judge said Ortega all day Thursday & Friday. Rowe next week.

Debbie Rowe

Kenny Ortega

Kathy Jorrie — tomorrow

Upcoming Witnesses:

We hope to see you tomorrow for full coverage of the trial. For latest, watch @abc7  and http://www.abc7.com . Have a good evening!

 Wednesday August 7, 2013

On Wednesday August 7, 2013 Kathy Jorrie continues with her lies but over here some interesting answers are elicited from her:

1. She says the contract with Michael Jackson was signed on January 26th, 2009. But Shawn Trell, who saw Michael just once said that he went to sign a contract with Michael on January 28. Can someone please explain how AEG can have two dates for one and the same event?

A quote from Shawn Trell::

A I’m sure the contract signing is the only time I met Michael Jackson

Q no sir, you told us ten times, and counsel had it in her questions, that on January 26th, 2009, you met Michael Jackson, and he signed all of those agreements.  You told us all about that, didn’t you, sir?

A that’s my recollection yes

And here is the famous exchange of emails saying that Trell is going to sign a contract (and meet the “freak”) on January 28, 2009:

Freak

2.  Panish rightfully points out that Kathy Jorrie overlooked the “mistake” that Murray was to perform the services requested of him by the Producer not just once, but on 4 drafts of Murray’s contract.  Jorrie does not explain why.

3. Kathy Jorrie also prepared a letter for Tohme to sign on behalf of Michael’s company stating that MJ agreed to cover production costs. However Tohme was not a ligit representative, but our good lawayer naturally “didn’t know” about it –  she didn’t know that he was never a representative of Michael’s company same that she never knew that Tohme had been terminated by Michael Jackson from whatever position he had.

4. When Panish asked her why she didn’t verify with John Branca on June 28th, 2009 whether Tohme representated Michael or not, in reply she challenged him with a defiant question “and why did Branca agree to pay the expenses then”?

Panish’s answer was intriguing – and how did she know that he agreed if she never saw the budget papers she says she never saw?

(Indeed, Kathie Jorrie isn’t an AEG employee and is not privy to this information, is she?)

5. And the next phrase about the “implication that the Estate didn’t recognize contract as valid” made me jump on my seat – so there is some hope that the Estate also considered the contract invalid?

Can it be that the Lord heard my prayers at last?

 

Wednesday August 7, 2013 DAY 64

Hello from the courthouse in downtown LA. Day 64 of Jackson family vs AEG trial, Week 15, is underway. We’re now on lunch break.

Kathy Jorrie is back on the stand for cross examination. Brian Panish, attorney for the Jacksons, doing the questioning.

Jorrie brought copy of the contract she used as template to draft Dr. Conrad Murray’s agreement.

She also gathered an estimate AEG paid her law firm since 2000, covering 14 years of work. Panish asked if it was in excess of $7.2 million.

Jorrie: It’s my estimate that my firm received a little over $ 7 million since 2000, which is about $500,000/year for services for AEG Live.

Panish: Did you say you negotiated probably 75 agreements with artists?

Jorrie: It’s about 75, but it could be more, all for AEG Live.

Panish: Where you representing Michael Jackson when you were preparing Dr. Murray’s contract?

Jorrie: I was not.

Regarding the LAPD conversation, Panish asked Jorrie if she was represented by Marvin Putnam in that meeting. She said no.

I really didn’t feel like I needed representation in that meeting, sir, Jorrie said. “I was a witness.”

Panish asked if Jorrie represented herself, since she is a lawyer. She said she doesn’t know how to answer, you always represent yourself as attorney

Jorrie met with LAPD twice in her office. Detective Smith questioned her, Putnam and Deborah Brazil, one of the DAs prosecuting Murray, were present

Panish: Do you remember telling me yesterday that you never told LAPD that MJ was engaged to go on worldwide tour?

Jorrie: Yes

Panish: Do you remember you denying telling the police department that statement?

Jorrie: Yes

Panish asked if after reviewing LAPD’s interview, Jorrie contacted Det. Smith to fix it. She said no, read it only months later.

Panish: Did AEG ever enter into a tour agreement with Michael Jackson that required him to do a world tour?

Jorrie: Yes

Jorrie explained some things had to happen before the world tour could take place.

She said the world tour was contemplated, but it didn’t mean it was going to happen.

Jorrie explained that if the parties agreed, then the tour could go on beyond London.

Jorrie said Dr. Tohme was a manager for Michael Jackson during the time they negotiated the tour and continued until the time of death.

Michael Jackson’s contract with AEG was signed on Jan 26, 2009.

Panish: Did you ever have reservations in January 2009 about Dr. Tohme?

Jorrie: I did

Jorrie said she googled Tohme and couldn’t see he was a music manager.

Panish asked Jorrie if she checks people on google. “That’s usually my first step in the process,” she responded.

Jorrie: As an alternative, yes.

Panish: And you recommended that a background check be done on Tohme, right?

not the real McCoy

Kathy Jorrie: “Tohme is not the real McCoy” (click to enlarge)

Jorrie explained she recommended at minimum that someone meet with MJ to make sure he understands he’s entering into worldwide tour agreement.

Jorrie said background check was not done on Dr. Tohme, at least to her knowledge. She didn’t do one.

Jorrie explained promoters and producers can and do negotiate third party vendors agreement as part of the business.

The attorney said she was very much involved in drafting Michael Jackson’s agreement with AEG.

Panish said Jorrie refused to have her deposition videotaped. Jorrie explained she was not properly notified about video deposition.

Dennis Hawk, Tohme Tohme and Michael Jackson’s company received a copy of MJ contract with AEG, according to Jorrie’s deposition.

Panish: On January [June] 28, Mr. Tohme approved the cost in excess of $7.5 million, correct?

Jorrie: On January [June] 28, Dr. Tohme had provided written approval that MJ company had approved certain production costs.

Jorrie said it’s actually June 28, 2009, not January as she previously stated. MJ died on June 25, 2009.

Panish: At the time of MJ’s death, are you aware of anyone approving production costs in excess of $7.5 million that was in the contract?

Jorrie: I’m not privy to everything, so I don’t know.

Panish: Did you ever see a written agreement for more than 31 shows as stated on the contract?

Jorrie: No, not that I recall.

Panish: The agreement specified the territory of the tour as the world, correct?

Jorrie: Correct

Panish shows contract of Michael Jackson with AEG.

Panish: And the term was Dec 2011 or conclusion of world tour, whichever occur later, right?

Jorrie: That’s what it says in the paragraph.

The contract says the shows were not to exceed 1 per day and 3.5 shows per 7 days.

Panish asked, if under the contract, Michael Jackson was prohibited to tour except if done with AEG.

Jorrie was not allowed to answer, since it calls to interpretation of the contract.

Jorrie said she sent the contract to Michael Jackson’s representatives.

Panish: Did you ever learn Tohme ceased being MJ’s manager?

Jorrie: To my best recollection, that issue came up after Mr. Jackson’s passing.

The fact that Tohme stopped representing MJ came up and it’s in litigation, Jorrie said.

Jorrie said Howard Weitzman, attorney for Michael Jackson’s Estate, told her about Tohme in connection with litigation several years ago.

Frank DiLeo may also have told her, she said. There’s also litigation about it as well.

Jorrie said she doesn’t recall if Weitzman was the first person who told her about Dr. Tohme not representing MJ at one point.

On June 28, 2009, there was a meeting at John Branca’s office with all the higher ups for AEG and MJ’s representatives.

Panish: AEG was out $34-plus million at the time?

Jorrie: I believe so, perhaps more.

Panish: On that day you questioned if Dr. Tohme was an officer of Michael Jackson’s company?

Jorrie: I did.

Panish: And that day you didn’t have anything in writing approving $34 million in expenses?

Jorrie: Correct.

Jorrie said she believed Dr. Tohme was an officer of MJ’s company prior to June 28, 2009. Paul Gongaware may have been the one telling her.

During the meeting on June 28, Jorrie said Tohme told her, personally, that he was an officer of Michael Jackson Company, LLC.

Jorrie said in Delaware you can’t check officers for LLC online.

Panish: Did you look up to see if Dr. Tohme was an officer of MJ’s LLC?

Panish inquired if Jorrie could’ve asked MJ directly if Tohme was an officer of his company. She said yes, if she felt it was necessary.

Panish: You never spoke with Michael Jackson, did you?

Jorrie: Not once.

Production costs summary

Tohme was no officer of MJ company either in January or June 2009 when he approved all production costs on Michael’s behalf

Jorrie was involved in drafting a consent agreement for Tohme to sign.

Panish: Who signed the tour agreement on behalf of Michael Jackson’s company?

Jorrie: Michael Jackson.

As of January 2009, Michael Jackson was the sole officer and signatory of Michael Jackson Company, LLC.

Jorrie received that information from MJ’s attorney, Dennis Hawk.

Panish: Before MJ died you had nothing in writing that MJ was not the sole company officer?

Jorrie: Nothing in writing was provided to me.

Jorrie said in the meeting they were getting consent from Tohme that production expenses had been approved by MJ’s company.

Panish: But you needed someone approved by MJ’s company, right?

Jorrie: That’s why we had confirmation he was an agent.

Total expense was around $34 million, plus $7.5 million that was pre-approved based on the contract resulted in $27 million outstanding.

Panish: AEG had $27 million out there that they had spent?

Jorrie: That’s my understanding.

Panish: And you and Mr. Trell had a document you gave Tohme at the meeting?

Jorrie: Yes.

Panish: And the word “consent” was there?

Jorrie: I’m not sure it was there.

The document was prepared by Trell and Jorrie prior to the meeting at Branca’s office.

Panish showed Jorrie a letter from Michael Jackson to Randy Phillips on April 22, 2009.

The document, signed by Michael Jackson, terminated Dr. Tohme’s representation as his manager.

Jorrie said she does not recall seeing it.

Letter from Concerts West to The Michael Jackson Company, LLC Jorrie helped draft, dated June 28, 2009.

1.I hereby confirm that Artistco (MJ) approved the attached budget of expenses which includes Production Costs and Pool Expenses

3.The undersigned Dr. Tohme Tohme represents he’s officer of Artistco, has full authority to act on behalf of Artistco/to sign this document

Panish: You never asked Tohme after MJ died if he was an officer of MJ’s company?

Jorrie: That’s right.

Jorrie: He confirmed to me, at the meeting, that he was an officer of Michael Jackson’s company.

Panish: Did you see any document saying Tohme was an agent of Michael Jackson’s company?

Jorrie: I had not seen any such documents.

Panish: Did you make any effort to confirm Tohme was an officer of the company? Jorrie said she spoke with Tohme about it.

Panish asked if Jorrie inquired John Branca, MJ’s attorney, if Tohme was authorized to sign on behalf of Michael Jackson Company, LLC.

Panish asked if she discussed with Branca about Tohme signing the document. Jorrie said she didn’t

I didn’t ask him that question, Jorrie said.

Panish said the document she handed to Tohme has a budget attached to it. Jorrie said she did not review the attached budget.

Jorrie said budget was given to her by Gongaware. Panish asked if the budget included payment of $150k/month, times 2 months, for Murray.

Since Jorrie testified she didn’t read the document, there is no foundation for her to answer the question. Judge sustained the objection.

I had nothing in writing that said Tohme was an officer of Michael Jackson’s company, Jorrie testified.

Panish asked if Jorrie saw the attached budget. “I never looked at that, that was Paul’s job,” she answered.

I have never seen a single piece of paper saying Tohme was not an office of the company, Jorrie said.

Jorrie: Why would the Estate approve the expenses then, sir?

Panish argued Jorrie doesn’t know what’s on the budget, so how does she know the Estate paid what’s requested.

Jorrie: I know Dr. Murray was not paid because he was not entitled to be paid.

Panish: Was Dr. Tohme there on the budget for $200,000?

Objection, sustained (since she had not read it.)

Judge told Panish to move on or she will cease the examination.

Defendants objected again based on attorney-client privilege

Panish: Mr Trell never told you about this document (MJ’s termination of Tohme)

Judge sustained the objection and ordered lunch break.

Outside the presence of the jury: Judge Yvette Palazuelos to Panish: You keep invading attorney-client privilege.

Judge: As to the budget — she keeps telling you she didn’t review it. Any question about the budget is without foundation.

Judge: I don’t want to waste time with that, over and over. I know you understand the ruling, I assume you have nothing better to ask.

If you don’t move on I’ll shut down the examination, Judge Palazuelos told Panish.

Panish explained what he was trying to do, that Jorrie volunteers and continue to volunteer what is not asked, almost more than any witness.

Panish: It’s improper what she did, your honor. As member of the bar, she knew as of January that this person was not officer of the company

Panish: Nonetheless she, as concerned he was not the real Mccoy, brought document to him with $34 million for him to sign off.

Bina said it was done in good faith, Tohme told her he was an officer of the company. She said DiLeo also told Jorrie MJ approved the budget

Panish: When she says my client told that, why can’t I ask about communication about that?

Judge ordered Panish to move on or she will finish his examination.

After lunch, outside the presence of the jury, Panish told judge he’s excluding anything that’s potential violation of atty-client privilege

Panish asked the judge to strike testimony of Jorrie when she issued opinion that the Estate didn’t pay Murray because he wasn’t entitled to

Jacksons attorneys want the judge to tell the jurors to disregard it, since the implication is the Estate didn’t recognize contract as valid

Jury entered the courtroom at 1:42 pm PT. Katherine Jackson is present in court wearing a navy blue jacket over a floor-length dress.

Jorrie explained she doesn’t recall working on agreements where AEG was both producer and promoter of the show.

Jorrie said she never worked on a contract for a doctor to go on tour, except for Michael Jackson.

Email from Murray to Wooley: I am basically in agreement and reiterate that your memo is correct pursuant to our conversation of May 8, 2009

Email cont’d: As for good faith with my client I’m sure that you are aware that my services are already fully engaged with Mr. Jackson.

Jorrie said she doesn’t recall receiving or seeing this email. Murray never told her he was meeting with AEG people regarding his contract.

Panish: Did Dr. Murray ever tell you he met with AEG personal at anyone’s request?

Jorrie: No

Wooley did not tell Jorrie that Dr. Murray’s services were being rendered.

Panish: Did you ever tell Dr. Murray he could not perform work without a fully executed contract?

Jorrie: Of course not.

Jorrie spoke with Murray about getting medical license to work in the UK. She knew Brigitte Segal was looking for housing in London for him.

Panish asked if it was in anticipation the contract would be all signed by July 3, 2009.

Panish: They were undertaking acts that were spelled out in the contract?

Jorrie: Yes.

Panish: Dr. Murray was undertaking acts that were spelled out in the contract?

Jorrie: I was told he was the personal physician for 3 years.

Panish showed the template contract Jorrie used to create Dr. Murray’s agreement. Jorrie said she took out paragraph 7 about Conflicts.

Panish: Regarding pay, equipment, starting and ending date provided by Mr. Wooley and not Dr. Murray, correct?

Jorrie: That’s not right, Mr. Wooley didn’t give me an ending date, for instance.

CPR machine was on the list Wooley provided to Jorrie regarding the requirements for Dr. Murray.

Panish played video of Jorrie’s testimony in Murray’s trial. She said in latter part of May, Wooley advised her he needed contract prepared.

May 1, 2009 is the commencement of the contract. Jorrie sent the contract to Dr. Murray on June 15, 6 weeks later.

Panish: Did you ever testify that payments had been promised to Dr. Murray retroactively to May 1?

Jorrie: Yes, once the contract was signed

Panish played another part of Jorrie’s testimony in the criminal trial.

DA asked if irrespective of the contract becoming activated, Murray was contemplating compensation from a period retroactively to 5/1/09.

Panish discussed paragraphs 3 and 4 of the contract, which spelled out the obligations for AEG and Dr. Murray.

Panish asked if AEG could terminate Dr. Murray without the consent of Michael Jackson. 

Jorrie: Yes

He told me his four medical practice was grossing a million dollars a month, Jorrie testified.

Panish: Did you find his website?

Jorrie: No, I didn’t find a website.

Panish said $150,000 per month equates to $5,000 a day for 30 days.

Jorrie put Conrad Murray and the names of his two clinics on google.

Jorrie: He said he had 4 medical practice, but I only found 2 clinics.

Panish: He was making a million dollars with two clinics?

Jorrie said she could find addresses for only 2 clinics, but Dr. Murray told her he had 4 medical practices.

Jorrie explained she looked up Dr. Murray’s medical license and two clinics are named.

I don’t know for sure it was his companies, Jorrie admitted. “It was my assumption they were his.”

Jorrie said the clinics were in Nevada and Texas, didn’t find anything in Hawaii and California.

The attorney said she spent about 10 minutes researching Dr. Murray online. Panish asked if Jorrie charged AEG for the time she spent.

Jorrie: Yes, for all my clients.

Panish: Sometimes you do freebies for AEG?

She said she doesn’t know.

Jorrie uses Lexis for legal research, she said. Panish asked if she checked how many judgments existed against Dr. Murray. She said not.

Jorrie didn’t check any pending lawsuits, litigation regarding child support or if Dr. Murray’s properties were in foreclosure.

Jorrie conceded she could’ve searched Dr. Murray in Lexis.

I definitely said he (Murray) appears to be successful, Jorrie said about her conversation with Randy Phillips.

Panish: And you determined Dr. Murray was successful based on 2 clinics?

Jorrie: No, it was based on my conversation with him and verifying the fact that he was licensed to practice medicine in 4 states.

Panish: Did you tell Phillips Dr.Murray made a million dollars a month?

Jorrie: I think I told him he (doctor) appeared to be successful and may have told him about his practices making a million dollars a month.

P: You verified licenses, googled him for 10 mins?

Jorrie: Yes

Panish: Your successful assessment was based on what Murray told you?

J: Yes

Panish asked Jorrie if Dr. Murray had to shut down his practice in order to work for MJ. She said no.

Panish: Dr. Murray could keep, sell or have someone else run his practices as to retain the $12 million/year revenue?

Jorrie: Yes

Jorrie never communicated with anyone representing Michael Jackson regarding Dr. Murray’s contract.

She did not send MJ or his reps any draft of the agreement, but sent them to Shawn Trell at AEG.

Dr. Murray called Jorrie on June 23, 2009 and told her he spoke with MJ about extending the end of the contract to March.

Dr. Murray would receive salary for 3 months plus without working, since the tour would be off, Jorrie said.

Panish asked if Jorrie checked with anyone in MJ’s camp whether the artist had indeed approved the extension of the contract. She said no.

I did not check anything with MJ’s representatives about Dr. Murray’s contract, Jorrie testified.

Jorrie sent the last version to Murray on June 23, 2009. All versions said 4.1- Perform the Services reasonably requested by Producer.

Jorrie’s files:

Murray Agreement 6-15-09

Revised MJ/AEG/GCA Holdings Agreement 6-18-09

Final MJ-AEG-GCA Holdings Agreement/Dr Murray 6-23-09

Panish concluded cross examination. Jessica Stebbins Bina did re-direct of Jorrie.

Jorrie said the names of the files included all signatories of contract.

Because it was for Michael Jackson’s physician, Jorrie explained

Jorrie said she values the relationship with AEG, but that does not prevent her from testifying in a truthful manner.

Bina asked about the time Jorrie represented Gongaware and Meglen.

She said it was a lawsuit filed by the children of Tom Hulett against AEG Live, Paul Gongaware and John Meglen.

Panish’s old firm represented the children, Jorrie said. It was a trademark infringement case.

We prevailed in all counts, Jorrie said.

Jorrie said plaintiffs claimed they were using Concerts West name without permission.

Jorrie: My clients received the judgment. It was appealed and the judgment in favor of my clients was affirmed.

The tour agreement had a potential to be a world tour Jorrie said. “In order for tour to continue beyond London, the parties had to agree”

Michael Jackson could’ve chosen not to approve the itinerary, Jorrie said.

Jorrie told LAPD detective that the agreement had potential to be extended to a world tour, based on mutually-approved itinerary.

Bina asked about paragraph 11 of MJ’s contract, which talked about “Approvals.” It says no party can withhold approval unreasonably.

Initial production advance not to exceed $7.5 million.

Contract Section 8.2 — Production cost

Bina: Based on that provision, if they request them (costs), they are responsible for them?

Jorrie: Yes

Jorrie explained, based on the contract, AEG was to recoup all costs incurred for production. Outstanding balance was MJ’s responsibility.

Bina showed the document Tohme Tohme signed approving the costs of production.

Jorrie said John Branca requested a meeting on June 28, 2009 to discuss several issues, among which how to unravel the tour.

Branca was named executor of MJ’s estate, had to be approved by probate court.

At this point, judge adjourned trial until tomorrow at 9:45 am PT. Kenny Ortega will be back to testify tomorrow.

Jorrie is ordered to be on call to conclude her testimony, probably Friday morning and Randy Jackson’s depo Friday afternoon.

We hope to see you tomorrow for full coverage of the trial. For latest, watch @ABC7 and visit http://www.abc7.com . Good night everyone!

Thursday August 8, 2013. DAY 65

There is something fundamentally wrong in examining a witness on one date and cross-examining him three months later. No one remembers the weak points of his earlier testimony, and all of it has to be started afresh with the only difference that now it turns into some small talk with little new information added and the old information already forgotten, and all attention is focusing  now on the witness’s pleasant manners and a nice tan.

What for did they ask Kenny Ortega to the stand again? To make him out as a great friend of Michael Jackson and an impartial witness?

But Ortega is NOT an impartial witness – it was he who reported Michael to the AEG bosses and threatened to quit the show if he didn’t attend the rehearsals. It was he who suggested playing a tough love and now-or-never card on Michael.  It was he who by the accounts of eye-witnesses was rude and over demanding towards Michael, and did not allow him even take away his ear piece though now he hypocritically says that he considered Michael his “boss”.

I’ve heard Ortega speak to Michael in This Is It film and his tone was far from that of an employee speaking to his boss. It looked like it was exactly the opposite.

No one recalls now that Ortega didn’t give a damn that the shows were scheduled too close to each other for Michael and he had no rest between the concerts. No one remembers that Ortega would do his director’s job and have a rest after that, while for Michael the tour was only starting, however Ortega never spared him and complained that he was missing too many rehearsals. And in Travis Payne’s opinion, for example, MJ missed no more than 4 or 5 rehearsals in the whole period of it.

On June 19th Ortega realized they had gone too far in pressurizing Michael, grew frightened with what he did and backpedaled a bit with all those panicky emails. The emails were regarded by Randy Phillips as an unforgivable weakness and he brushed them aside as Kenny’s “hysteria”, saying that “this guy is beginning to worry me”.

This was the drama and tragedy of those days we witnessed and cried over when he was testifying for the first time sometime in May. However now all the tears and chill of those tragic days are forgotten and are happily replaced by a lot of pleasantries instead.

I bet that now Ortega is sun-tanned, well-rested and a nice sight to behold. Now he is reflecting at his leisure that Michael “didn’t show at all” in June, he doesn’t remember AEG to put any pressure on MJ and Murray, and he can’t even remember MJ deteriorating in front of his eyes.

Michael Jackson is no longer the top artist for him but is “pretty close to it” but he is not sure that he would have commanded the world like he did before.

In addition to all that now he says that no one was responsible for Michael’s health but Michael himself! For some reason this quickly reminded me of prisoners in concentration camps and some overseers there making cynical observations that the health of their inmates is fully in their hands too.

Good-bye, Mr. Ortega – all I can say as a farewell to you is that it is extremely unfortunate that your nice ways managed to fool the jury. With pleasant guys like you the world can crash into abyss and everyone will be still applauding. What can await us in the future if we allow ourselves to be so easily deceived?

Thursday August 8, DAY 65

Hello from the courthouse in downtown LA. Day 65 of Jackson family vs AEG trial, Week 15, is underway. Session now in lunch break.

Katherine Jackson is in court wearing an ankle length black dress with a black and white polka dot jacket.

Jury entered the courtroom 10:10 am PT. Judge Yvette Palazuelos advised jurors she came up with new time estimate for the trial.

Judge: My estimate has now changed. The case will probably be submitted to you at the end of September.

It is what it is, judge said. She told jurors before they would get the case at the end of August.

Outside the presence of the jury, AEG attorney told judge he will be done 1st week of Sept or so. Panish said he has 4 rebuttal witnesses.

Judge said they are bringing Kenny Ortega back on the stand out of order to finish his testimony.

Ortega is under cross examination by AEG’s attorney Marvin Putnam. Ortega had professional engagement overseas, not available until today.

Putnam showed Ortega a “Certificate of Employment — Loan-Out,” which Ortega said it’s certificate that he works for The K.O. Company, Inc.

AEG Live had an agreement with K.O. Company for the services of Ortega.

P: What were you employee of?

O: K.O. Company

Putnam: Did you understand you were an employee of AEG Live?

Ortega: No

I was only contracted, and we were only focused, on the London tour at this time, Ortega explained.

Ortega’s contract was executed on April 26, 2009. “I believe I was paid in advance of signing,” Ortega said.

In his deposition, Ortega was shown documents to refresh his recollection. Putnam showed him the same documents.

Ortega looked at the document and said he was paid on May 11, 2009, which is after he signed his contract.

Ortega: That’s what appears in this document.

Putnam: You were paid after the contract was executed, right?

Ortega said he has put himself in the position of working prior to signing a contract. “It’s what I call working in good faith.”

Putnam: If you don’t reach an agreement, you could work and not get paid?

Ortega: Yes

It’s sort of common in the industry, Ortega said.

I can recall specifically, but I’m sure in my 40-something years in this business that has occurred, Ortega testified.

In Ortega’s contract, there is a provision for bonus in case “This Is It” tour went around the world.

Putnam: If tour was successful, you already have in your agreement what you’d be paid in bonus, correct?

The shows were not booked or guaranteed, Ortega said. “That’s what I think Michael hoped to do, but wasn’t booked.”

Ortega’s contract does not have a signature line for Michael Jackson.

Putnam read Murray’s contract were it says the contract is not valid unless MJ consented to it and asked if Ortega has that in his contract.

Ortega: That’s what I understand it’s in my contract

Ortega went thru all the pages of his contract and said: “I do not see that anywhere.”

Putnam: Did you consider it a tour?

Ortega: We called it tour, term used in the industry, but we weren’t really touring, it was 1 venue.

People were calling it a tour but it was more like an event, Ortega explained.

He told me he only wanted me, Ortega said about Michael Jackson’s wished that he be the director.

Putnam: Is it fair to say you were the “TII” director because of MJ?

Ortega: Yes.

Ortega said he doesn’t remember who he said reached out to him first regarding the tour in his deposition.

Putnam showed Ortega’s deposition transcript. “In deposition, I remember it to be Dr. Tohme,” Ortega said.

In a deposition related to Lloyds of London litigation, Ortega also said Dr. Tohme first reached out to him regarding TII.

In Dr. Murray’s criminal trial, Ortega said it was Paul Gongaware.

Putnam: Do you remember as you sit here today who first contacted you?

Ortega: I’m not really certain.

Ortega said he didn’t really know who Dr. Tohme was, have never met the guy at that point. Tohme said he called on behalf of MJ.

Ortega testified he never really fully understand Dr. Tohme’s role related to MJ. He thought was a friend.

Regardless of who contacted him first, Ortega said he was hired because Michael Jackson wanted him.

Ortega said AEG Live and MJ were co-producers of the show.

Ortega said he reported to Michael Jackson for the creative side of the tour and regarding budget/financial matters he reported to Gongaware

Ortega explained he dealt with Gongaware regarding technical things, like moving dates to new rehearsal venue, delivery of stage parts, etc.

Ortega would discuss with Michael about hiring someone and the director would go to Gongaware to get the contract drawn and the person hired

Ortega did not discuss with Gongaware anything related to creative matters.

Because the creative person was Michael, and myself, Ortega explained.

We talked about these things together and I’d go with Michael’s blessing to Paul to begin the process, Ortega explained.

Putnam: Did he ever tell you you couldn’t get something?

Ortega: No.

I’d go and say ‘this is what we’d like,’ Ortega said.

He would just make it happen, Ortega said. He could not recall Gongaware denying anything.

Final say would be Michael, Ortega said. “Michael had final creative say.”

Putnam: Why?

Ortega: Because he was brilliant and he knew what he was doing.

At the end of the day, creatively, we trusted Michael knew what we needed, Ortega said.

Ortega said February, March and April MJ was very involved in the creation of the show, would show up a lot.

A lot meaning 3-4 times a week, Ortega clarified. He said things changed as they were moving to the Forum, which was end of May.

Putnam: Who did you consider your boss?

Ortega: Michael.

Ortega: I thought of MJ as my partner, I didn’t think of him as my boss. But MJ always had the final creative say in all the years we worked

Putnam: Did you feel AEG Live supported MJ?

Ortega: Yes

Putnam: Did you ever see AEG pressure Michael in any way?

Ortega: No

Ortega: Everything we brought to AEG, in terms of enormous creative needs, that AEG was very supportive in doing all they could.

Ortega said he would ask Gongaware for more and more things to create the show. Gongaware never denied anything.

He said there were professional discussions like ‘is this something you really feel it’s going to benefit,’ ‘do you really need this.’

Ortega: I think we were getting in a place were we had a ceiling, because we were already with a fat budget.

Ortega: But at the end, I believe they thought Michael had what he wanted.

Ortega said he learned from Randy Phillips that Dr. Murray was responsible to get MJ to rehearsals on June 15, 2009.

He explained he didn’t think Phillips was involved as much in MJ’s scheduling, but was overseeing it.

Ortega said he never spoke with Timm Wooley about scheduling.

I looked at Mr. Phillips as the promoter, Michael’s promoter and producing partner, Ortega testified.

Ortega: In this stage of the game, Mr. Phillips took on overseeing position to make sure the schedule was responsible for Michael.

Ortega: I think they were trying to create a schedule to factor in all of Michael’s needs (like family) and still could come to rehearsal.

Putnam asked about June 19, 2009. “I’ll always remember June 19,” Ortega said.

Putnam asked if Ortega testified before he thought MJ had a really bad case of flu.

I supposed I might have suggested it could look that way, Ortega said. “It would’ve been a really, really bad flu.”

Putnam asked if throughout the night on June 19th, if MJ got better. Ortega said yes.

P: Calm?

O: Yes

P: More engaged?

O: Yes

P: Warmed up?

O: A bit

Putnam: He was coherent?

Ortega: Yes

I felt somewhat calm when we left, Ortega said. But he said he was still concerned, thus the email he sent to AEG high ups.

Ortega: It didn’t appear to me it was drugs, it appeared to me it was something else, emotional.

Putnam: It never crossed your mind it could be drug related?

Ortega: No, I was thinking it was something else.

Putnam: You have never seen Mr. Jackson like that before?

Ortega: No.

Ortega sent an email after seeing MJ that way because he thought Phillips and Gongaware should know about it.

There was a meeting scheduled next day to address MJ’s problems on June 19.

Ortega said he thought it was a responsible way to deal with it, and pretty immediate after the fact.

At the meeting, Dr. Murray told Ortega to stay out of it and to leave MJ’s health for him to take care.

Dr. Murray told Ortega to quit being an amateur doctor and that MJ was physically fit to show, the director recalled.

Putnam: MJ assured you that he was fine?

Ortega: I didn’t feel assured

Ortega: He said don’t leave me, I’m gonna take the reins, you’ll see I’m going to change this. He seemed absolutely committed at that point.

Ortega: Murray started up saying I had no right to not allow Michael to rehearse that night and that I had no right to send him home.

Ortega testified he said: ‘Wait a minute, that’s not at all what happened.’ The director recalled Dr. Murray said MJ told him that.

Ortega: I looked at Michael and asked him to tell what had happened, that I didn’t forbid Michael of anything.

Ortega said, at one point, MJ told him he was going home. “I said yes, go home, tuck your children in, feel better,” Ortega described.

Ortega: I did think it was right he didn’t rehearse that night, I did think it was the right thing he went home.

Ortega said Dr. Murray told him to be the director and to quit his concerns with Michael Jackson’s health because it was not his job.

Ortega: I’d like to think that Michael would not set me up that way, I’d like to think Dr. Murray misunderstood Michael.

Ortega said Michael explained in the meeting that what Dr. Murray said was not what had occurred.

Putnam: Did you talk about drugs in that meeting?

Ortega: No

Putnam: Did he (Murray) offer any explanation of what happened to MJ the night before?

Ortega: I don’t believe so.

Putnam: Do you think MJ was being responsible with his own health?

Adults are responsible for their own health, Ortega opined.

Ortega: I worked with 10,000 people in the Olympics, how can I be responsible for everybody’s health?

Ortega: I didn’t think he was being very responsible, but it was his responsibility, in my opinion.

Jurors were writing viguroulsy at this point. Juror number 6 looked over at Katherine Jackson.

Ortega: I wanted to take care on him, you want to take care of someone when something is not right, but you can’t be responsible.

Putnam: Were you responsible for MJ’s health?

Ortega: No.

Someone on behalf of Michael Jackson contacted Ortega to be part of the HBO special.

Ortega never asked MJ about his rehab stint or any drug use.

Putnam: Did you have any reservation to work with him after rehab?

Ortega: No

P: Why not?

Because he came out of rehab, Ortega said. “He was moving on with his life in a healthy way, hopefully.”

Putnam: Did you ever talk to him about nutrition?

Ortega: As a general idea

P: Physical therapy?

O: Yes

Ortega said he would talk to MJ, as a performing artist, and ask if he was focusing on nourishment, health, warming up, stretching, sleeping

MJ wasn’t really fond of massage, Ortega said. “Don’t forget to eat, get some rest,” Ortega would tell MJ.

The singer would smile and answer “okay” in a very loving way, Ortega recalled.

Ortega said MJ liked to be in a certain kind of place (weight) to execute his moves and to get the look he

wanted. “I might have been a little concerned (with his weight) when I brought that up, yes,” Ortega testified.

Putnam: In your opinion, was Mr. Jackson always skinny?

Ortega: In the early years I worked with him he was light, lean performer.

“He was strong,” Ortega said. But 20 years later, when Ortega worked with MJ in the “This Is It,” the

director said MJ was much different.

Ortega’s first time working with MJ was in the “Dangerous” tour. He said he may have been director of the project. It was in 1992-93.

Ortega said he usually likes to stay in tour until everything is working to everybody’s satisfaction. He said it may be 4-5 shows or 8-10

Putnam: Did you have any concerns he might have been using drugs then?

Ortega: No. At this time, MJ was living at Neverland.

Ortega said they never rehearsed at MJ’s ranch, but a stage in Los Angeles.

Ortega was called to help MJ with the HBO special.

Putnam: He seemed well to you?

Ortega: Unhappy

Putnam: Was he physical well?

Ortega: He seemed tired and unhappy, stressed.

Putnam: But at no time you thought he was using drugs?

Ortega: No.

Ortega was present at Beacon Theater when MJ collapsed. He didn’t see the artist fall, though. He said security responded quickly, everybody stayed away to give paramedics room to work. MJ was transported to the hospital. Ortega didn’t go, because he said he wasn’t invited. “Certainly concerned,” though, he explained.

HIStory tour rehearsal was done in Los Angeles, Ortega said.

Putnam: Did you have any concern with MJ’s health?

Ortega: I don’t recall having any concerns

P: How about mentally?

O: No

Putnam: Were you concerned MJ was doing drugs before “TII” in 2008?

Ortega: No, I saw him.

Ortega said he had dinner with MJ a couple of times, MJ took his children to see High School Musical, and that he looked fine.

The director described MJ very excited, even not knowing yet what “TII” was going to be, but feeling exhilarated.

Ortega said MJ was being approached by someone from American Idol, also Randy Phillips approached him, they wanted to do something with him.

I think seating in a theater for 5 years in Las Vegas wasn’t really attractive to him, Ortega explained.

Michael wanted to get out on the road, Ortega said.

Ortega: I was happy for him, because he had been through so much, I wanted him to be the King again.

Ortega: I think the arrival of his children in his life brought something he didn’t have before.

He seemed exhilarated, excited, like the Michael I always knew, Ortega described.

Ortega: He was unbelievable! His reasons for doing the tour were incredible. He was motivated.

Ortega said the meeting on June 20th was at MJ’s Carolwood home. On June 23rd, Ortega testified MJ was in great spirits, ready to work.

Putnam: Completely different?

Ortega: Completely

Ortega: He seemed healthy, ready and happy, there didn’t seem to be any left over issues from the 19th.

Ortega said MJ was always a little chill, but not like on the 19th. The director was surprised how quickly MJ got better.

Putnam asked if Ortega inquired MJ what had happened. “I didn’t pry in his personal live,” he replied

It was like metamorphosis, he said.

Putnam: How was the rehearsal?

Ortega: Great. It was one of the best rehearsals we had up until then.

Putnam: Had he taken the reins?

Ortega: Yeah

MJ was there a number of hours, Ortega said. He went through a number of songs.

Ortega: He was in charge. Not only capable to rehearsing but to talk about other aspects of production, like films, the effects, costumes.

Ortega said he just embraced it and went with it. “We were all delighted” Ortega recalled. “The energy in the room changed, hope returned”

Ortega: Everybody felt there was a different Michael in the room.

Ortega said MJ was almost as good on the 24th as the 23rd. He seemed a little tired from the day before but talked about things for the show

MJ also rehearsed and performed. Ortega said he was feeling they were back on track, believing they were in a new chapter.

Maybe it was a lot of rest, Ortega opined. “He did seem rested, stronger”

Ortega felt less excited, deeply grateful about MJ’s come back.

Putnam: Did you have concern on the 23rd or 24th he was taking drugs?

Ortega: No.

Ortega said said excitement was pretty unanimous among all the people working on “This Is It.”

In re-direct, Panish asked: Prior to June 23rd, you thought Michael got real organic sleep?

Ortega: Yes.

Panish: And before that you thought he was not having any sleep?

Ortega: Yes.

Panish: The symptoms he had, did it seem like someone who wasn’t sleeping?

Ortega: I think that might have been a factor there.

Panish asked Ortega to assume MJ was getting Propofol for 60 days then didn’t have Propofol the last few days before his death.

Ortega: I assumed sleep had to be a part of it, he looked rested.

Panish asked is Ortega saw MJ several times appearing under some kind of drugs during TII.

Ortega: It seemed like it was doctor related, so it wasn’t like taking drugs but just being under the influence.

Panish: In all your years in the industry, have you ever heard a producer involved in hiring a doctor for an artist?

Ortega: I haven’t.

Ortega said he thinks it’s unusual for producers to engage attorneys to hire a doctor for an artist.

Ortega clarifies that the only artist, “the” artist, was Michael Jackson.

Panish asked if MJ could’ve been fired by AEG. “No, he was a partner,” Ortega responded. He said Michael told him that.

Panish: The producer could fire you if they wanted, right?

Ortega: I think Michael would not be happy with that.

I assume they could give a good try, Ortega responded. “I assume they could do that but I doubt it would last more than 24 hours.”

I don’t think producers can fire Tom Cruise, Ortega opined. Panish said movies are different from singers.

I don’t think producers can fire Cher, Ortega said.

Panish: Were you ever involved in a show where promoter was buying CPR machine?

Ortega: Not that I know of.

Panish: Were you ever involved in a show where promoter was buying saline, catheter, needles for a doctor?

Ortega: No.

Panish: Have you seen a CEO for promoter/producer involved in artist rehearse attendance/schedule?

Ortega: CEO no, producers/promoters yes.

Panish: Have you ever seen a situation where a CEO for promoter/producer set rehearse schedule with artist’s doctor?

Ortega: No

Panish: Did you think you were not being demanding enough of MJ’s attendance and schedule?

Ortega: No

Email from Woolley to Bob Taylor saying Randy Phillips and Dr. Murray were responsible for MJ rehearsal and attendance schedule.

I recalled that Dr. Murray was going to be responsible for the schedule, Ortega said.

Earlier in the trial, Ortega testified rehearsal schedule and attendance was up to Dr. Murray and Randy Phillips.

Ortega said, at one point, there was a standstill regarding his contract.

Email from Gongaware to Ortega on March 25, 2009: I’m afraid we may not be able to meet your financial requirements for a deal.

Panish: Are you aware of any artist in the world with the drawing power of Michael Jackson?

Ortega: I’d think if done right, that Michael would be the highest draw on the planet.

Panish: You don’t think Celine Dion would be bigger?

Ortega: I think the Stones come close, McCartney come close. But if MJ was not the number one, he was very close.

He sold 50 shows, Ortega said. “Pretty awesome, historical.”

Ortega said he disagrees with anyone who says there’s no way MJ could’ve done 50 shows.

Panish: Did you ever have assistant producer say she was afraid an artist would die in weeks of a show and they actually did die?

Ortega: No.

Yes, he did change over time, Ortega said about Michael Jackson.

Panish: Was MJ perfectionist?

Ortega: That would be something that people would have called him.

Ortega: Most of us have never seen anyone work as hard to accomplish something as MJ.

Ortega said he didn’t see MJ at practice for a long period of time in June.

Panish: In June, he didn’t show at all?

Ortega: That’s correct

It was fairly obvious he was not moving forward in the rehearsals with this sort of tempo, Ortega testified.

Panish: Did you have concerns about his physical condition on June 14?

Ortega: I’d say yes.

Panish: Sir, did you tell anyone that MJ should’ve been taken to the hospital?

Ortega: I might have.

Panish: Did you say that after MJ died?

Ortega: No, I think I’d have said it sooner than that.

Panish: You didn’t think Dr Murray was doing a good job?

Ortega: No

Ortega suggested another physician, not Murray, come to check MJ out.

Panish: Did you think MJ was irresponsible?

Ortega: It seemed to me that he was in trouble.

Ortega: MJ was very cool, bold, strong in his ideas and what he wanted all through the beginning of the process.

Eventually he started to decline and disappear, Ortega recalled.

Panish: I want you to assume that AEG Live hired Dr. Murray. Would you expect them to hire a fit and competent doctor?

Ortega: Yes.

Panish: You expect AEG to check them out, not being under conflict of interest situation?

Ortega: Yes.

Panish asked if Ortega was doing his job when he sent email with concerns. “More than just doing my job, looking out for my friend” he said.

Ortega said Dr. Murray did not have the same mindset as him in the June 20th meeting.

Phillips didn’t do anything to stop Dr. Murray’s admonishment of Ortega in the meeting, Panish said. Ortega agreed.

Panish: Did you ever learn that Phillips was grabbing Dr. Murray’s arm?

Ortega: I never heard that.

Panish asked if Ortega knew how much pressure AEG was putting MJ and Dr. Murray on.

He said no.

Panish: Did you heard Murray walked out and said he couldn’t take this s**t anymore?

Ortega: No, I never heard that.

Ortega then opined: If Michael ever heard you talk like that it would not be appropriate. Isn’t that right Mrs. Jackson?

Katherine Jackson nodded in the audience in agreement. “In respect of why we are all here for, that’s not nice,” Ortega said on the stand.

Ortega said he never told Faye MJ had to face his fears; used the word tough love, may have said the show could be cancelled if not ready.

Ortega: Michael had not performed in 10 years. Whether he’d command the world like he had before remained to be seen.

However, the sell out at the O2 for 50 shows showed he still had drawing power, Ortega opined.

Putnam did re-cross.

Putnam: Did you see Michael deteriorate over 8 weeks?

Ortega: I would’ve not used the word deteriorate to describe what I saw.

The week of June 15th is when Ortega grew concerned with Michael Jackson.

Ortega said nobody came up to him on the 23rd or 24th expressing concern about MJ. They did on the 19th but not after MJ came back on 23rd.

Putnam: Would it be surprising to you that the Rolling Stones have a doctor on tour with them right now?

Ortega: No.

Putnam: You just don’t know some of those things, right?

Ortega: Yes.

Putnam: Have you ever worked on a tour where an artist was $400 million in debt?

Ortega: Not to my knowledge.

Putnam: Have you ever worked on a tour where the artist could not afford his daily expenses?

Ortega: I don’t believe so.

Putnam: Have you ever worked on a tour where the promoter/producer was advancing all daily expenses?

Ortega: It’s possible, I don’t know.

Putnam: Have you ever worked on a tour where artist was unable to pay his personal doctor?

Ortega: I don’t think so, assumption on my part.

Putnam: Who introduced you to Dr. Murray?

Ortega: Michael

P: Did AEG introduce you to him?

O: No

P: What did MJ say?

O: This is my doctor.

Putnam asked if AEG checked if the doctor was licensed and if he had been disciplined, if it was responsible thing to do. Ortega said yes.

Putnam: If they weren’t hiring Dr. Murray, would that responsibility be above and beyond anything they needed to do, in your mind?

Ortega: I think that would’ve been responsible.

Putnam: Did Mr. Phillips ever tell you he wanted MJ to come on tour?

Ortega: No

 

In re-re-direct Panish: Would it be responsible to place a doctor in a conflict of interest had they hired him?

Ortega: In my opinion, no

Putnam in re-re-cross asked if it’s common practice to check a doctor’s credit report prior to hiring him.

I wouldn’t think it would be something that would be the norm, Ortega responded.

Putnam: Do you think it’s responsible for a studio to hire Kenny Ortega if he were in debt?

Ortega: I’ve been there and they hired me.

Putnam asked if being in debt diminishes your capability. “I don’t think so,” Ortega responded.

Ortega: Being in debt doesn’t change your talent, your gift, your ability.

Panish in re-re-re-direct: Do you have access to a prescription pad?

Ortega: No

Putnam and Panish took turns in asking out-of-the-ordinary questions regarding responsibility to Ortega.

Jurors were laughing out loud with the exchange between the attorneys. The director kept his composure and responded to all questions.

Ortega was dismissed, subject to recall in AEG’s case in chief.

When the director got up, all jurors clapped for him. He thanked the jurors, kissed Mrs. Jackson, shook hands with Shawn Trell and left.

Judge adjourned session a little early. Jurors ordered back 9:30 am tomorrow. Kathy Jorrie is back on the stand.

AEG plans to play Randy Jackson’s deposition and Dr. David Adams from Las Vegas in the afternoon. We hope to see you tomorrow! Good night!

 

Friday August 9, 2013 DAY 66

Kathy Jorrie’s lies continue.

Now she says that Panish never showed her any document proving that Tohme had no right to represent the Michael Jackson company. But we have an email from Dennis Hawk to her and Shawn Trell dated January 14, 2009 (or two weeks before signing a contract with MJ) saying that Michael is the sole officer of his company and is the only one who can sign for it (so Tohme can’t, especially after MJ’s death when all representation of him ceased).

MJ is the sole officer of the MJ companyKathy Jorrie also explains that she was in no hurry to draft a contract with Murray as she thought that he was working for Michael then and it was his usual job which he had been doing for MJ for 3 years by then.

Over here I have two questions:

1) if she thought that before the AEG contract Murray was working for Michael, for whom was he supposed to work after it? AEG as Tohme is telling us?

2) And didn’t she hear from another AEG witness LaPerruque, MJ’s head of security, that he never saw Murray in 2007 and beginning of 2008? So what three years is she talking about?

Kathy Jorrie also says that “of course” AEG was not to supervise Murray but does not explain how it was possible for AEG not to supervise Murray if he was to doas they requested and his services were to be approved by them?

And they had the right to terminate him without asking for MJ’s opinion by the way?

You can read all her further lies if you want, but I suggest you skip and go over straight to Randy Jackson’s deposition. You can fully enjoy it without my comment as I will refrain from it for the moment. All I can say is that it is the exact opposite to that of LaPerruque and his approach to Michael Jackson:

Friday August 9, DAY 66

Hello from the courthouse in downtown LA. Day 66 of Jackson family vs AEG trial is underway. We’re currently on lunch break.

Kathy Jorrie is back on the stand. Jessica Stebbins Bina resumed re-direct examination.

Katherine Jackson is not present in court today.

Bina showed Jorrie MJ’s contract. Paragraph 13: Artistco hereby represents/warrants that Artist does not posses any known health conditionin, juries or ailments that would reasonably be expected to interfers with Artist’s first class performance.

injuries or ailments that would reasonably be expected to interfers with Artist’s first class performance.

Bina: Who signed this?

Jorrie: Michael Jackson.

Bina: So MJ represented that he did not have any health condition that would interfere with his performance?

J: None whatsoever

Bina: Drug problems?

Jorrie: I never had any information that MJ was not in good health.

Bina asked if Jorrie believed Tohme was an officer of MJ company.  She said yes

Bina: Insomnia or sleep problems?

Jorrie: Not in the least.

Bina: Did Mr. Panish show any documents that he was not an officer?

Jorrie: He did not.

Regarding the email Dennis Hawk, MJ’s attorney, sent Jorrie on January 14, 2009, she said they wanted to replace the name of MJ’s company.

It’s usually the type of representation she gets

Bina: Before Jun 28 you had been told Tohme was an officer of the MJ’s company?

Jorrie: Yes

Bina asked if Jorrie was told on June 28, 2009 that Dr. Tohme was an officer of MJ’s company when he received the consent document.

Jorrie: That’s my best recollection, I was informed that he was an officer of Michael Jackson’s company.

Jorrie said Tohme himself represented to her he was an officer of MJJ’s company.

Jorrie said the meeting on June 28, 2009 was called by John Branca, co-executor of MJ’s Estate, co-executor John McClain was on the phone.

She said Frank DiLeo and various AEG reps were also present at the meeting and Tohme was there speaking about things having to do with MJ.

Dr. Tohme was there discussing MJ’s business in front of everybody, Jorrie testified. “Nobody challenged Dr. Tohme or his presence.”

Jorrie said Dr. Tohme signed this document. She said she has seen Frank DiLeo’s signature as well approving the expenses.

Bina asked if Weitzman told her Tohme had been fired but nevertheless the Estate agreed to reimburse AEG for production costs

Jorrie: I’m aware that the Estate reimbursed some costs.

Bina asked if Woolley forwarded Jorrie an email saying Dr. Murray was fully engaged in Mr. Jackson’s treatment in May. She said no.

B: Did Murray tell you that?

J: He did

Bina: Did it surprise you Dr. Murray was fully engaged and treating MJ in May 2009?

Jorrie: No.

Bina: Why not?

Jorrie: Because I understood from Murray that he was MJ’s personal physician for 3 yrs

Bina asked if Jorrie told Dr. Murray to stop treating MJ until they had an agreement. She said no.

Jorrie: The reason is that Dr. Murray was Mr. Jackson’s physician and it would not be my place to tell him not to provide services.

Jorrie said MJ had been his patient for many years.

Bina: Did Dr. Murray need an agreement with AEG Live to treat patients?

Jorrie: No, he did not need an agreement from AEG Live to perform services to his patients, including Michael Jackson.

Jorrie read graph 9 of the contract, “Artist Consent.” It says that without the express written consent of MJ the contract was not valid.

Jorrie: This is an independent contract agreement. Dr. Murray was MJ’s physicians, retained to and in the expense of the artist.

Bina: You didn’t put any provision for Dr. Murray to be supervised by AEG Live?

Jorrie: Of course not.

Bina: Are there any words in agreement that says Murray can only use medical equip approved, bought by AEG?

Jorrie: There’s no such wording

Jorrie said there was also no word about Dr. Murray having to use only equipment provided by AEG to treat Michael Jackson.

Bina: Did Dr. Murray ever ask you for any equipment?

Jorrie: No

Bina asked about end date of contract. Original date was Sept. 2009, but Dr. Murray asked it to be changed to March 2010, Jorrie said.

Bina asked Jorrie why she didn’t check with MJ or his reps about changing the end date of the contract.

Jorrie explained they were negotiating a contract to a place where Dr. Murray was happy with the agreement.

She said it would then be presented to MJ and his representatives for approval.

Bina: Did you ever send the signed agreement to MJ?

Jorrie: No, I didn’t.

B: Why not?

J: Michael Jackson passed away.

Jorrie used as template an independent contract agreement used in the King Tut exhibition.

It was between an individual and affiliate of AEG. There is no mention of artist consent in that contract, it was not a service to an artist

Jorrie said she took out the conflict provisions because they dealt with conflict of interest for the individual working for a competitor.

She said that provision was no applicable to Murray. Jorrie also took out provision “Intellectual Property” since it was not applicable also

Bina asked if Jorrie’s understanding was that Dr. Murray was making one million dollars a month.

She said he understood his medical practice brought in a million dollars, from which he had to pay his expenses, nurses, medical equipments.

Jorrie said from the conversation she had with Dr. Murray she did not understand he was going to close his medical practices to go on tour.

He told me he was leaving the practices to go on tour with MJ, Jorrie explained. Dr. Murray never told her he was closing his practices.

Jorrie found that there were two places of businesses associated with Dr. Murray and his medical licenses.

Jorrie: I found Dr. Murray was licensed to practice medicine in 4 states, no disciplinary action against him in any state.

The clinics she found were in Nevada and Texas, Jorrie said. “The 2 places of businesses that I assumed were clinics.”

Jorrie: It was just spot check, I checked his medical licenses, there were no disciplinary actions, company was legit, everything matched.

I had no reason to doubt the information given to me was incorrect, Jorrie said. “There were no red flags.”

Jorrie: I didn’t think it was my place to check Michael Jackson’s physician, who he had for many years.

Jorrie said GCA Holdings was a legitimate company, its license had not be suspended.

Panish then did re-cross of Jorrie.

Panish: Did you bill AEG for the research you did?

Jorrie: It was 10 minutes of research and it was part of preparation of Murray’s contract

Jorrie explained she would not have entered into the invoice a spot check of Dr. Murray’s licenses/company.

Panish: Does your time entry has anything about check you did on Murray? Jorrie said she needs to look at the documents to refresh memory.

Jorrie said a red flag is when things come up that alerts her to evaluate further.

Panish: There were no red flags raised in the 10-minute search you did on Dr. Murray, correct?

Jorrie: That’s correct.

Jorrie said she was checking to make sure the information Dr. Murray gave her were correct.

Panish: Did you ever do a google search for Michael Jackson Company?

Jorrie: No.

Jorrie said she went on to the Delaware Secretary of the State website to check Michael Jackson’s company.

Panish: MJ’s company was a sole member LLC, wasn’t it?

Jorrie: That I don’t recall when I looked at it.

Jorrie said she believes she has a copy of the Delaware Secretary of the State of when she checked MJ’s company.

Panish: Did you bill your client for that work?

Jorrie: I don’t recall, I have to look at the time and see whether or not I billed them.

Jorrie said she never received any document from Shawn Trell stating anyone else as officer of Michael Jackson’s company.

Panish: Did you ever contact Delaware Secretary of State to see if Dr. Tohme was an officer of MJ LLC?

Jorrie: No.

Jorrie did not contract John Branca, co-executor to be, to check if Dr. Tohme was an officer of MJ’s LLC.

Jorrie said Mr. Tohme did not sign the consent document in her presence. She gave him the document for review.

Panish: Were you aware Dr. Tohme was supposed to get paid $200,000 for signing this document?

Jorrie: I wasn’t aware, sir.

Panish: Were you aware the budget called to pay Dr. Murray $450,000?

Jorrie: I was not aware, sir.

She testified she never asked Branca if Tohme was officer of MJ’s company.

Jorrie said the budget had to be approved prior to any payment.

Jorrie said she saw Dr. Murray was licensed for cardiovascular something. He was also licensed in internal medicine.

Panish asked if there’s such a things as cardiovascular license. “I told you what I remember seeing,” Jorrie explained.

Panish: Did you see his internal medicine license had lapsed in 2008?

Jorrie: No, I don’t remember seeing it.

Panish: Is your testimony that Dr. Murray was licensed in internal medicine and cardiovascular?

Jorrie: It’s my testimony under oath that’s what I saw 4 years ago, yes.

Jorrie said she told Dr. Murray he would get paid once the contract was fully executed.

Jorrie sent all drafts of the contract to Trell and AEG, but never sent them to Michael Jackson or his representatives.

This was the 1st time Jorrie negotiated a contract for an artist’s physician. She never researched about third party contract for artist/doc

Jorrie said she did not go out of her way to check Dr. Murray’s credit report, debts, outstanding child support claims.

Panish asked if Jorrie was copied on any of the chain email “Trouble at the Front.” She said she was not.

Jorrie said the only medical check she’s aware of that Michael Jackson underwent was for the insurance company.

Jorrie said Howard Weitzman may have told her about the dispute in termination of Dr. Tohme.

In re-re-direct, Bina asked: Why didn’t you ask John Branca if Dr. Tohme was officer of the company?

Jorrie said Branca was a co-executor to be and she believed he would not know the answer. He had been MJ’s attorney for a week.

Jorrie thought Dr. Tohme would be the most appropriate to ask whether he was an officer of MJ’s company or not.

Bina: Did you think there was conflict of interest in the contract? “I believe that there wasn’t contractual conflict of interest” Jorrie said

Jorrie explained MJ and Dr. Murray’s interests were aligned, to treat him and keep him healthy while performing at the O2 arena.

In re-re-cross, Panish asked if Jorrie has expertise in medical conflict of interest. She said she’s not an expert in medical conflict.

Jorrie said she read that Branca represented MJ about 10 years before.

Panish: AEG didn’t have to have a contract with Dr. Murray, right?

Jorrie: It was an accommodation, sir.

Panish asked if there was anything preventing AEG from preparing the contract with Dr. Murray and giving it to MJ. She said no.

In re-re-re-direct, Bina asked if MJ specifically asked AEG to draft the contract for Dr. Murray and advance funds necessary?

Jorrie: Yes

in re-re-re-cross, Panish rebutted: And AEG could’ve refused it, right?

Jorrie: Yes

Jorrie was then excused. Judge broke session for lunch. We are waiting for trial to resume, since judge is dealing with other matters.

AEG changed witnesses. They will play video deposition of Dr. Gordon Sasaki, a plastic surgeon of Pasadena, CA.

The other witness scheduled is Randy Jackson, also via video deposition.

 

AEG claims Randy doesn’t want to come testify in person; Jacksons say AEG doesn’t want him to come in person. What do you think is true?

We’ll bring you complete coverage of this afternoon’s session as soon as we are able to tweet. Remember, per judge, no live tweets.

Everyone still in the hallway waiting. Fans, reporters and many lawyers on stand by.

Back in session…

Jessica Stebbins Bina said AEG is calling Randy Jackson via video deposition.

Q- Question (by an attorney)

A- Answer (by Randy Jackson)

First deposition was on Nov 6, 2012.

Q: Do you know Grace Rwamba?

A:Yes, and fired her too.

Q: Why?

A: Because he asked me to.

Q: Your brother Michael did?

A: Yes

Randy said he and Michael were pretty close, since they were close in age.

The attorneys stipulated the firing occurred in 2004/2005.

Randy said he doesn’t remember when it was the last time he spoke with MJ. He said MJ was traveling.

Q: Did you call him in 2009?

A: I don’t remember

Q: Did you see him in 2009?

A: I don’t remember

Randy said Frank DiLeo was MJ’s manager. “From what I understand until my brother passed,” he explained.

There was a time he was the manager, then not manager, then manager again, Randy said.

Q: Your brother didn’t want to see you and you went to see him?

A: Yes

Q: Couple occasions?

A: Yes, 3 or 4 times

I wanted to make sure he was ok, Randy testified.

MJ’s brother said one intervention was in Vegas, then in NY then LA. Randy remembered 3 times and intervention being attempted.

Because I had received call that he had been abusing prescription drugs, Randy said. Grace called him, he’s sure if she called anyone else

Randy said it was around the time of the trial, doesn’t know if before or after, not sure.

MJ was staying in Vegas. Randy said he went there with Jackie, Rebbie, maybe Janet, maybe Marlon.

Randy said he spoken with Grace, the other siblings spoke with her too. “We may have had a conference call.”

Q: Have you ever believed MJ was abusing prescription drugs before?

A: Yes.

Grace called Randy before about MJ using prescription drugs. He said she called him two or 3 times before.

Randy confronted MJ every time Grace called him.

Randy said security told him MJ didn’t want to see him. Just drive in and walked in the house. The gate was open, I just drove in walked in.

Q: Did you see MJ?

A: Yes. I told him him I was taking him to rehab,” Randy said. “He said he was not going. I said you are, he said I’m not

MJ didn’t go to rehab. Randy said the other siblings told MJ the same thing, to go to rehab.

Q: Did he admit having a problem?

A: No

Q: Did he deny he had a problem with prescription drugs at that time?

A: No

Q: Did he say whether or not he had a problem with prescription drugs at that time?

A: No. No he didn’t say it

They were with MJ for 2 hours

Randy said MJ told him ‘Don’t worry, I’m okay. I’m not gonna go.’

Q: Did he seem ok?

A: At the time yes

Q: Did you leave thinking he had a problem?

A: Yes

Q: When was next discussion?

A: That may have been the last time, maybe. There were prior times.

It was just around the Santa Maria trial, Randy said. “It was after, I think.”

Q: Up until the time of his passing you never discussed it with him again?

A: No

Q: Why not?

A: I hadn’t gotten call from Grace or anyone

Randy said Leonard Rowe told him MJ may have prob w/ prescription drug. He guessed it was around time shows in London were being prepared

Randy: No, let me correct that. Initially we were playing on our tour, the brothers tour. There was concern then.

Q: Did you ever discuss that with your parents?

A: Yes

Q Their reaction?

A: Displeased

Q: With?

A: Him not getting the help that he needed.

Randy said he doesn’t know if the parents talked to MJ. Randy and Janet had a doctor in the mix for the Vegas intervention.

He was an experienced interventionist, Randy testified.

Q: How did you know that?

A: He told me

Q: Had you met him before?

A: No. Internet, maybe

Q: Was this Mr. Webb?

A: No. I don’t recall

Q: Besides siblings and the doctor was there somebody else who went?

A: I don’t recall who the 2nd guy was. I didn’t arrange it, Janet knew

They talked to MJ while there, Randy said. He doesn’t rememeber specifically what was said, but that the family loved him, wanted to help.

Randy said he met the interventionist doctor at Madeo for lunch, probably met doctor one time prior as well.

He said he wanted to know just what they do and what is the procedure here, what they suggest.

Randy discussed MJ’s stint in rehab before with the singer. Randy said he thinks it was one time that MJ was in rehab.

Randy said he told the doctor there had been prior attempts to get MJ help and they weren’t successful, needed professional help.

Randy discussed with the doctors the attempted interventions. Randy did not speak with the doctors again after that.

Besides Michael, just security was present.

Q: You mentioned another one in NY?

A: Yes

Randy believes the NY attempt happened prior to the Vegas time. He said he was worried about MJ, about “prescription,” “prescription abuse.”

Grace had called Randy each time. Janet, Rebbie and Tito were with Randy in NY. It happened in early to mid-2000.

Grace called him, he called the family, other family members, Rebbie, Tito, Janet, Randy said.

You need to get down here, Randy said Grace told him. She didn’t need to say anything else. “Because, my brother,” Randy explained.

Randy went with family only to the NY intervention.

Q: Did he agreed to see you?

A: I guess, I just walked in.

He wouldn’t go Randy said about his attempt to take MJ to rehab.

Q: Did you tell him to go?

A: Yes

Q: Did he tell you he wouldn’t?

A: Yes

Randy doesn’t remember the details of the conversation, whether MJ admitted or not abusing prescription drugs.

MJ didn’t go to rehab, Randy didn’t tell the parents, he said he didn’t want to stress them out.

Randy called Grace. “She told me that he cleaned up,”

Q: How?

A: Because I was there, probably.

Randy testified the brothers just talked to him. “Just tell him that his family loves him, concerned for him.”

Q: Did he clean up after LV intervention?

A: Yes

Randy: He stopped using these things, as fas as I know, he stopped using it. I learned it from Grace, pretty much Grace.

Randy doesn’t know how he cleaned up. The intervention at the Ranch occurred after NY. He got a call from Grace “You need to get down here.”

Randy told siblings, Rebbie, brothers, Janet. They had another conference call. The parents were not on the call.

Randy: I think my mom found out about the Grace.

My family went with me, he said.

Q: Did you mom go?

A: I think so. Janet, Rebbie, no Marlon, not sure LaToya, no Jermaine, Tito maybe, Jackie

Randy said he just walked in. One the brothers went over fence to open the gate

Q: Because security won’t let you in?

A: Yes. We don’t ask

MJ didn’t want to go to rehab that time either. The brothers stayed a few hours. It was just family, no doctors.

Q: Believe your brother had problem with prescription drug?

A: Yes

Q: Did MJ deny he had a prob with prescription drugs?

A: Yes

Q: He also refused to go to rehab?

A: Yes

I didn’t believe him, Randy testified.

Just leaving there all the brother talked about it, Randy said. Other family members didn’t believe him either.

My mom didn’t believe it, Randy explained. “But it’s my mom, she didn’t want to believe it.”

After the Las Vegas intervention, Randy said he watched MJ clean up. He was around, it was around Santa Maria trial.

He just did it and got ready for the trial, Randy explained. MJ never discuss any drug problem with Randy ever.

They were at the Ranch for 2/3 hours. Randy discussed with MJ the Ranch intervention after.

I told him I wanted him to go to the therapist with me, Randy described. He said this was after Santa Maria trial, which took over things

Randy said he went to visit Frank DiLeo in the hospital after he was in a coma. He knew DiLeo for 20-30 years.

Randy learned DiLeo came back as MJ’s while the O2 show was being put together.

Q: Was he a good manager?

A: Yes

Q: Did MJ talk to you about his burned scalp?

A: Yes. He said it was painful.

I went to visit him at the hospital, Randy said about MJ. He never discussed with MJ insomnia, sleeping problems.

Randy did not know about MJ taking anesthesiologists on tour.

Randy said he never saw MJ take prescription drugs or illegal drugs. He never heard of propofol or diprivan prior to MJ’s death.

Q: Did your brother ever discuss taking medication to sleep?

A: No

I never got a call about illegal drugs, Randy explained.

Q: When did you first come to believe MJ had a prob with prescription drugs?

A: I guess it was Grace.

The first time was in Los Angeles, she called me, Randy said. It was around 2000, year 2000.

She just told me she was concerned, Randy described. “Because he was using prescription medication too much.”

Q: What medicine?

A: Sedatives, whatever they call them, sedatives.

Randy didn’t talk to MJ about it at this point. He talked to Rebbie. “I was investigating about it, talking to people around him.”

Randy: Also, as I recall, I tried calling a doctor in Vegas and a doctor in Florida, but they wouldn’t talk to me about it.

Randy said he forgot the doctors’ names. He talked to doctor friends he knew about his concerns of MJ’s prescription drug abuse.

Q: Was he addicted?

A: I don’t know, I wasn’t sure, I wasn’t clear on it.

Randy: Just excessive use, maybe, I don’t know if I would call that an addict, I’m not a doctor.

Q: Did he ever tell you he had a problem with prescription drugs?

A: No.

Q: Did you ever discuss you believed your brother had a problem with prescription drugs with your mother?

A: Yes

That was after the second attempted intervention at Neverland, Randy testified, which was the same as the one his mother attended.

Randy said he had a phone call with his mother, he initiated the conversation.

I told her that we need to plan an intervention and that, her being a mother, because she was there.

Q: Did your mother ever tell you she believed your brother had problem w/ prescription drugs?

A: No, no, she didn’t tell me that believed

Randy said he and his father tried to call MJ while he lived at Carolwood home. “We were unsuccessful,” he said.

Randy: There was a drug issue. He wasn’t eating. All of these things were happening at the same time. And, you know, a lot of pressure.

Randy: Leonard Rowe was involved very much in the shows and was giving reports to me that he didn’t look too good.

Randy said they were concerned about prescription abuse around the time MJ was living at the Carolwood house.

Randy had already selected a rehab facility to take MJ. It was in the Bay area, San Francisco. The same place were interventionist worked

Randy said his brother didn’t drink. “I never seen him drink alcohol.”

Q: From 2000 until the time that your brother passed were there periods you believed he didn’t problem with prescription drugs?

A: Yes

Second part of the deposition was taped on March 26, 2013.

Randy said Michael enjoyed touring.

Q: Why do you say that?

A: Well, because we like to tour, perform.

Q: Did you ever see any signs he was on prescription meds on tour?

A: No.

Other than the times Randy described in the last deposition, she said saw signs MJ was on prescription medications at home.

Randy said this was in 2005 at the Shadow Wood home in Beverly Hills. “He was under the influence of something.”

Randy said his speech was slurred. Then Grace, his nanny, would tell me all the time, “You need to get over here. Something’s not right.”

I went over to help him out and take everything away as I could, Randy testified.

Grace called Randy again to come over. “She needed help with him. He wasn’t doing so well.”

Randy: We had discussed this before, so I kind of knew what was going on.

Q: And what did you see when you went over there?

A: He was certainly under the influence of something that was altering his normal way of functioning. I tried to get help him some help.

Randy said he tried to take everything away, from Grace too. “It was ironic because she was giving it to him but complaining about it.”

Randy said some prescription drugs were in Grace’s name. “It was upsetting to me. I think she had a hard time saying no to him.”

Q: You just looked around the house and took bottles?

A: I made her show where everything was.

Randy: Because what good would it be to help him if you’re leaving stuff there?

Randy said there wasn’t much to talk to MJ then. “Yes, I could talk to him but I’d pick my moments. I’d wait till he’d be a bit more in tune

Q: Did he tell you what he was taking specifically?

A: No

Q: Did you do anything else besides take it away?

A: I went downstairs, I think he had some friends over. And I went downstairs to eat something.

Randy: They ran downstairs and told me that he had collapsed. And I went upstairs. I picked him up, put him on the bed, it was pretty late.

Randy: And as I recall, I called my doctor who lived literally around the corner. My doctor came over and took care of him, said he’ll be ok

Randy said the doctor gave MJ something that would counter, help counter whatever it is he had done.

Just let him rest it off. Somebody should sleep next to him, make sure he doesn’t vomit or choke, anything like that, doc told Randy.

Randy instructed one os the Cascios to sleep next to MJ. He stayed overnight as well.

Next morning, Randy said MJ was sleeping pretty late. “I wanted to make sure he was ok, then I left,” he said.

Randy asked MJ next day if he remembered what happened. He said MJ replied “no, no, but I heard.”

He said he took it to help him sleep, and he said it was a mistake and that he was sorry about it, Randy testified.

I was just kind of taken aback by it, maybe, he said.

Q: Did you have concerns about MJ at that point?

A: Yes

Randy: I staged several interventions and set up, tried to get him help many times.

Q: You mentioned Grace would call but was getting him medication?

A: Yes. A few times I would meet her at the pharmacy.

Interventions:

NY

Neverland

Las Vegas

Q: Were there any other?

A: It was more than one at Neverland.

There were a few over there. I don’t know, maybe 4 or 5, Randy responded. It was around 2004, 2005. Or 2005-06.

Randy said he was spending a lot of time with him, so he kind of got close look at what was going on.

Randy wrote letters to my family about MJ’s problem and that they had to do something to help.

Q: Who did you send the letter to?

A: Everybody, copied everybody. I made sure everybody knew it.

Randy: He’s an addict, and at this point, addicts aren’t so responsible for what they do.

Randy:  So this is where the family needs to step in and do something about it because their desire becomes physical.

Q: Did you send it to your mother as well?

A: Everybody got a copy of it.

He wrote the letter down on paper and had assistant copy it. He said not  everybody in his family looks at email.

Q: Did you get responses?

A: I think everyone was in shock, maybe a little denial. I always got responses, my dad, Rebbie and Janet, always

Randy: No, my mon no. As a mom, I guess maybe it was hard for her, you know, for a mother to see that.

The 4-5 interventions at Neverland were between 2004-2006. “One of them included my mom,” Randy said.

Rebbie and Janet went on all of them, except one or two.

Q: Describe the 3-4 additional interventions:

A: First one at Neverland, not the one that KJ was present. Janet, myself, Rebbie. Maybe my mom was at that one. I think my mom was there.

Katherine was at one intervention only, Randy said. “That must’ve been the first one, around 2002-2003, at Neverland.

Randy said Rebbie and Janet were always supportive, always with him. “My dad also.”

Q: What happened when you arrived at Neverland?

A: I think that time he wasn’t there.

Randy didn’t speak with MJ that day. He said people would tip MJ off. “So it’s bad news. Randy’s coming to shake things up.”

After Vegas, there were no more interventions, Randy said. “I tried to get him help but I couldn’t get as many people to stage intervention”

Randy tried to jump the gate a few times. “My dad and I tried a few times to get him help.”

Shadow Wood home was 50-thousand square feet. Randy said he hated it, it was just too big.

Randy: Michael wouldn’t want to really be around his family too much, I think because he didn’t want us to see him that way, specially me

Q: Could you give a range if years that this was happening?

A: It happened over a period of time, when I was, he stopped doing it also.

Randy: When I was helping with the situation in Santa Maria I was able to make it stop. I fired Grace, stoped it from coming in.

Randy said MJ would really, relaly enjoyed being around his children. He would cook for them.

He was in a great place, Randy said. “Then Grace came back around and he started using it again. I was very pissed off about it.”

Randy said he started right before Santa Maria trial but he got MJ clean. He told Rebbie “don’t leave his side” because I didn’t trust Grace

Randy: I fired her again, I noticed when she was around there was a pattern. Whenever she’s around, he’s wasted. So I fired her again.

Q: Were all of the interventions were before the Santa Maria trial?

A: There was one after, the Vegas was after.

Randy: He was using it again because there was a… it was quite disturbing to me.

Randy: There was a People Magazine article coming out talking about his drug use. Grace told him that I was behind putting this article out.

Randy: Grace and actually Raymone Bain because I fired them both.

I fired them both that’s probably whay they said it, Randy opined. “It had nothing to do with me.”

Randy said MJ got people in his family to sign a letter that was on People Mag saying he never used drugs. “I was really disturbed by that.”

He said he wasn’t behind the article, but didn’t sign the letter. Janet, Rebbie and his dad didn’t sign it either.

The letter was MJ’s idea, Randy said.

Q: Did you mom sign it?

A: My mom, LaToya, all my brothers.

Randy: My mom, you know, she would mever want to believe it. She’s a mom, you know. I felt bad for my her.

Randy: Did she ever believe he had a problem? Yeah, but I  think she was in denial, she didn’t want to believe it.

Randy: MJ didn’t want to talk to me too much. Because maybe I wasn’t afraid to say no to him.

Randy: He would get physical with me, I wouldn’t be afraid to say no. But he was 90 pounds, it wouldn’t do much.

Randy said MJ was really scared before the Santa Maria trial. And somehow Grace was able to get him something.

Randy: He didn’t want to go to court. He didn’t show up to court. And I was freaking out because it was on the news.

Randy: I went to hospital MJ said “I don’t know what you’re thinking. I’m not walking into that courtroom so don’t even think about it Randy

Randy: And I said “Okay, but you are going to court.” He goes “No, I’m not.”

Q: Was he in the hospital because he had reaction to his drug use?

Randy: No. He was in the hospital because he didn’t want to go to court.

Randy said that when Grace was around MJ, he was under the some kind  of influence. “But we had him go to court and had the doctor with him”

Randy: Then I later found out she had gotten him a patch. I was livid.

Randy doesn’t know what kind of patch it was.

He said MJ had slurry speech. “He was really frightened to go to that courtroom.”

Randy: He didn’t know who to trust, because people around him were lying to him, telling him things just to secure their positions.

Those were the only two times Randy saw him under the influence. “I’d get calls from Grace all the time,” he said.

Randy said the last time Grace called was a long time ago. “I made my presence known, there wasn’t lot more. She didn’t need to call.”

Randy: He was doing good in Ireland from what I recall. 06-7, 07-08 around that time.

Q: Do you know if he slept well while on tour?

A: He slept well

Randy said MJ had no issues sleeping that he knew of.

Randy: My dad and I tried to get the house at Carolwood. They wouldn’t let me through. My brother didn’t want me to see him like that.

Q: Who did you see there?

A: Security guard.

They told Randy “he’s not here, he’s not there.” Randy questioned if he wasn’t there why they had the gate closed. “Open it up, no big deal”

After being turned down, Randy would then go home.

Q: After Carolwood, did you or father take any other action?

A: No, after that time no.

Randy talked about interventions in NY, Neverland, Las Vegas. And there was another intervention in Taiwan.

Q: Did you go to Taiwan?

A: Yes, with Rebbie and some family members

MJ was doing shows in Taiwan.

Randy said what spurred him to go to Taiwan was the fact that he needed help, he was far away, we said we need to go.

Randy: I dind’t know anything but we had heard things. That’s why we were there.

Randy: I dind’t know anything but we had heard things. That’s why we were there.

Randy said in Taiwan they visited him, gave him family love, wanted to make him feel comforted so he wouldn’t think about doing those things

Q: Did he seem he was using drugs at that time?

A: Yes, his speech was slurred, but nothing terrible.

That was probably the first one, the first intervention, Randy said.

Q: Was MJ isolating himself?

A: Yeah, he would do that.

Q: Was he doing it in the 5 years before his death? Isolated?

A: Oh, parts, parts of it.

Q: Did you speak with him regularly?

A: I don’t talk to anyone in my family regularly.

Sometimes he would isolate himself because he didn’t want people to hear his voice Randy said.

Q: Because he might be using drugs?

A: Yes

Randy: After MJ died, everyone was shocked. I was really displeased with all the stuff that was going on in court with Branca, Weitzman.

Randy: We were still trying to figure out how to grieve, and these people are in court, and will, and this nonsense.

I haven’t even buried my brother yet, Randy said.

Randy said he pushed everything to the side and was getting together this memorial for him and did it with AEG, Kenny Ortega and those guys.

Q: Did you have a positive experience with AEG?

A: Horrible! (laughs) No, I’m just joking. They were nice. They were very nice.

Randy: I practically slept there to put the show together.

Q: Do you recall telling Randy Phillips that you see that Michael was fortunate to have AEG involved in his return to the stage?

A: I don’t remember saying that, but that doesn’t mean I didn’t say it. I kind of felt that way at the time.

That was the end of Randy’s deposition. Court adjourned until Monday at 10 am PT. AEG has not announced who the next witness is.

We hope to see you then for full coverage of the trial. For the latest, watch @ABC7 and http://www.abc7.com . Have a great weekend!


Filed under: AEG THE HORRIBLE, Jacksons vs. AEG Tagged: AEG, Kathy Jorrie, Kenny Ortega, LaPerruque, Michael Jackson, Randy Jackson

Jacksons – AEG trial DAY 70. DEBBIE ROWE and THE THRILLER OF MICHAEL JACKSON’S LIFE

$
0
0

This post is about the second day of Debbie Rowe’s testimony. But before that here is a short word about the sidebar that took place on the previous day Wednesday, August 14, 2013.

VITILIGO AS SUBJECT FOR A SIDEBAR

Lupus butterfly rash

Lupus butterfly rash

As we know the AEG lawyers object to every speck of dust in this case, and this time it was the fact that the Plaintiffs wanted to talk about Michael’s Vitiligo. This is what Ms. Chang replied to AEG’s objections:

Ms. Chang: The reason why I am bringing up Vitiligo, Discoid Lupus, the pain and the burns, is to establish the foundation of what they went through together because as a result of the three that happened in this 20’s at the same time as the burn area, the doctors were perplexed on what to do. When they treated the burn, the Discoid Lupus was an issue. When they treated the acne – it was like a chain reaction.

He ended up feeling so badly about himself, he thought he was like the Elephant Man, and the person he could talk to, because he didn’t want to bother his mother because he didn’t want to make her sad, is Debbie Rowe. That is the establishment of this close relationship and what they went through and why they became so close.

Traces of vitiligo left

Traces of vitiligo left

It also supports where his psyche was, what he had to go through. I don’t know of any other 20-year-old, frankly, or 23, who had to go through all of those things at once, have these procedures and get up and dance every day. And I think that given how they’re trying to present him as, “Oh, he just went in and even –” Botox and Collagen, making him sound superficial and vain like a star. I think we have the right and the duty to put forward what he was actually going through.

Ms.Stebbins: For the record, your honor, I don’t think that — there was plenty of testimony on direct examination about the pain, about the burn, about the difficulties with that. I’m not sure why Michael Jackson’s self-esteem issues are necessarily relevant to this issue. Again, my only concern here is relevance and undue consumption of time. If counsel is going to quickly go through Vitiligo — it’s not — – it just seems somewhat irrelevant and designed to – to bring in – I don’t even know what. Michael Jackson had self-esteem issues seems a bit far afield.

Judge: Overruled. I’m going to allow it.

January 1984 pepsi-commercial-burn-accident(30)-m-6

January 1984. The burn

I agree with Ms.Chang that a rare young man will have to cope with so many maladies falling upon him all at once and still be able to get up and dance every day.

Vitiligo must have been a frightening sight, lupus gave him a red butterfly rash on his face and a thick crust on his head, and the burn left him balding with keloid scars and all the pain coming with it – well, and after all that someone is still wondering why he was shy with girls?

Even to his mother he didn’t want to disclose all those terrible details not to make her worry, not to mention girls whom he didn’t want to disappoint or frighten with his health problems and looks. The poor boy suffered in silence.

He really considered himself disfigured and often cried due to the hopelessness of it, and we can perfectly understand why – even one malady like that would be enough to turn anyone’s life into a nightmare, and he had several of them and all taking place at once.

Debbie Rowe says that the skin on his head was popping when the medication was injected – so can any of us imagine what kind of pain it was if his skin burst at a touch of a syringe?

As to Michael’s choice of Debbie as his wife I think now all questions should fall off by themselves – her profession alone made her a natural companion for him as with this woman he could at least be at his ease – no need to cover up his baldness with a hair piece, no need to be embarrassed about his skin problems, no need to explain what medication he was taking and why.  And her sense of humor and easy approach to things were also a great help – in fact her formula “We may not able to make it perfect, but let’s see what we can do” is admirable and seems to me the best way to handle problems like that.

On the second day of Debbie’s testimony there were lots of questions about Michael’s health again, but the conversation still looked much more intimate because she spoke more about their children and also because once we got over the shock of all those medical details we finally regained the ability to notice other things too.

I for example, noticed that their marriage was absolutely real. One of the best types of marriages grow out of friendship, common interests and a good laugh shared by both sides, and Debbie Rowe gave all of it to Michael in abundance.  And even if he was not terribly in love with her he still appreciated her very much. In fact during the lulus fight they had in Mexico during the Dangerous tour she said he was embarrassed that he had disappointed her which is  a sure sign that her opinion did matter to him.

And the fact that she “had no filter” as her daughter Paris says was also a great help – in a way it compensated for what he himself could never afford to do. In short it was an interesting relationship and I am very grateful to her that she took so good care of Michael.

The way she was weaning him off the medications those idiots plunged him into is an absolutely model one and I am happy that she engaged herself in that undercover operation with Dr. Metzger to help Michael. She defied all loyalty to her boss and approached Dr. Metzger who seemed to be really the only doctor in MJ’s life who placed Michael’s interests above everything else.

I feel extremely sorry that at this trial this best Michael’s doctor will get the worst treatment from AEG and hope that in retaliation to that the Jacksons’ lawyers will at least not let Gongaware’s good friend Finkelstein get away with what he did. Further research fully confirmed that it was Finkelstein who undermined all the great work done by Dr. Metzger on weaning Michael off narcotic medications and was therefore the ultimate reason why Michael had to cancel the tour and go to a rehab in 1993.

DEBBIE ROWE’S SECOND DAY OF TESTIMONY

Here is what the ABC tweets said about Debbie’s second day of testimony:

Thursday August 15 DAY 70

Debbie Rowe Was back on the stand. Jacksons attorney Deborah Chang resumed cross examination.

Chang asked if traffic was better today. “It’s Palmdale… it was actually worse today,” Rowe responded.

Rowe said you couldn’t look at it and say it was lupus. Then Chang showed picture of black male with vitiligo.

The thing with vitiligo, the color can come and go and if you go on the sun you can get sunburn, Rowe explained.

For Michael, it came and went for a good period of the time. It was easy to cover with make-up, Rowe testified.

Everybody said he bleached himself, but he didn’t, Rowe said.

Rowe: It’s easier go lighter color and try to match with make-up. It’s hard to match dark skin, they don’t make good make-up for dark skin.

Rowe said Michael had come to a point it (vitiligo) was going to stay, it wasn’t going to get any better.

Each time the pigment disappearead, it got bigger and bigger. She said that cause tremendous anxiety in Michael.

Rowe said up until 99 MJ still had issues with it. “Vitiligo is seasonal, it’d come and go. Sometimes it’d be better and sometimes it wouldn’t

Rowe said Dr. Klein tried different treatments, ultimately tried to de-pigment.

You can’t just slap cream around whenever you want, you need to get your skin checked, Rowe said. That’s one of the reasons MJ saw Klein.

MJ is released from the hospital with a fedora covering his wound, 1984

MJ is released from the hospital with a fedora covering his wound, 1984

Michael’s burn was very serious, Rowe explained.

Rowe: I didn’t want him to feel as hopeless as he felt. We may not be able to make it perfect, but lets see what we can do.

He was very shy, so for him to have all of these going on and being in public it was very hard, Rowe testified.

Rowe said MJ cried about it, was embarrassed and felt disfigured. He was worried that people would see disfigurement before he would.

He didn’t really trust anyone at all, Rowe explained.

Chang asked if there was a comparison to elephant man. She said yes.

Rowe said Michael didn’t disclose it to his mother. He wanted her to know that he was okay and that she didn’t have to worry about him.

Chang: Did you always make him laugh?

Rowe: Well, that was our relationship.

Rowe said Michael had a really good sense of humor and they tried to find humor in stuff.

And if he was feeling down I’d do something to take his mind off of it, Rowe said. “I apparently have no filter, as my daughter says.”

Chang: Did he appreciate that on you?

Rowe: He did, I think he felt refreshed. Because he couldn’t do it, he was happy I could.

Rowe: He knew I’d look after him, I wanted him to see the best physician, would find people who would take care of him.

Rowe said she told MJ he needed to be organized with his medication, get one of those morning, afternoon, evening pill organizer.

Rowe went with Michael to see other physicians. Dr Metzger is an internist and rheumatologist who treats auto-immune diseases, such as lupus

Chang: So it takes a dermatologist and rheumatologist to treat discoid lupus?

Rowe: Yes

The wedding took place at night after the concert. Debbie Rowe was 6 months pregnant. Dr. Metzger was the best man.

The wedding took place on the night after the concert. Debbie Rowe was 6 months pregnant. Dr. Metzger was the best man.

Rowe said Dr. Metzger was amazing, became MJ’s internist. “And he was the best man in our wedding,” she said.

Chang: And he was almost phobic to needles?

Rowe: Oh, he was phobic.

C: And sometimes you’d have to literally hold his hand?

R: I always did

Rowe said Michael wanted her present in all procedures. She said he always had problems with scar on burn scalp.

Chang: Was Dr. Hoefflin a very prominent plastic surgeon?

Rowe: Yes, and very, very good.

Chang: He had painful burn keloids?

Rowe: They were keloids, I don’t believe there’s a different between burn or a cut. A keloid is a keloid

Rowe explained there were areas the scars were linear and elevated, other areas looked like skin had been stretched, other it was very thin

Chang: And do you know keloids can be very painful?

Rowe: They are.

Rowe said Asian skin and Black skin are the worse for trauma.

Rowe said keloid tissue is very dense, hard. To get cortisone in, you don’t want it to get around the keloid, you want it to get in the area

Cortisone softens the tissue. “You could hear the skin popping when the medication was going in,” Rowe said. “It was horribly painful.”

Rowe: He had such significant scarring, he didn’t have enough tissue left, there was no skin to stretch (to do reduction plastic surgery)

The burn area couldn’t grow hair, baldness also grew. “He hated it,” Rowe said. That’s when they called Dr. Sasaki, around 1993.

Rowe: What they show here is what happened to Michael. They would put saline every 7-10 days and let it stretch it out.

Chang: It literally expands, stretches the skin?

Rowe: Yes

It was brutally painful, Rowe said. “It required pain medication.”

There are time you cut keloid and you end up with bigger keloid, Rowe said. They wanted to have only 1 linear keloid on MJ’s head to deal

Around 1997, it fell apart. “Because of the lupus it didn’t hold down,” Rowe said. He had lumpier, bumpier keloids.

Rowe said after cortisone shot, sometimes the keloid would go down, sometime it would get worse.

Chang: And you saw first hand his fight with pain?

Rowe: Yes

Rowe: I wasn’t assigned to help him recover, I took care of him when he came to see Dr. Klein.

Rowe said, crying, that she went with Michael to other procedures out of love, not because she had to.

Because he was my friend, I wanted to make sure he was ok. Rowe developed a pain scale to help measure Michael’s pain.

Chang: At what number he got scared?

Rowe: 3

She said it was easier to assess the pain that way.

I don’t know that his pain level went from 3 to 10, I know his fear accelerated because his fear of pain was so bad, Rowe explained.

NOTE: The transcript of the first part of Debbie’s testimony explained a very important point – the pain had to be intercepted before it reached its peak, because if it was not caught at the right moment it required much stronger medication. This is why Michael was in constant fear of pain and of not being able to catch it on time, and they had to work out a pain scale.

This is when I thought – and what if that pain began to grow on him during a concert? What could he do? The way Debbie describes it the pain was awful:

Chang: When he had pain, did he have cold sweats?

Rowe: Yes

C: Was he pale?

R:Yes

Rowe said it was like a blind migraine, he couldn’t see, wasn’t performing at time, he couldn’t do anything.

Chang: Do you agree it was debilitating?

Rowe: Yes

C: And it was real?

R: Yes

Rowe: I didn’t want him to unnecessarily take, you don’t take vicodin if you can do it with motrin, for example.

She said they were doing demerol after surgery, then percocet.

Chang: He had legitimate need for pain medication?

Rowe: Yes

C: You agree MJ wanted to be responsible for pain management?

R: Yes

MJ in Monaco, May 1993

MJ in Monaco, May 1993. He doesn’t look too happy

He didn’t want to be loopy, Rowe said. “When he had pain medication, he didn’t go out. We stayed in, because he was slurring.”

Chang: That’s not how he wanted to be?

Rowe: Correct

C: Was he perfectionist?

R: Meticulous

Chang: Do you agree he did the best he could?

Rowe: Yes

His biggest problem was that Dr. Klein and Dr. Hoefflin were trying to overprescribe medication, Rowe opined.

Chang: Just to be clear, not at the request of MJ?

Rowe: Yes

He did not want pain, Rowe said. She said he had no choice but deal with the doctors.

Rowe: After procedure in 93, MJ went on tour and was doing that part of the tour until Forecast, I met him one time I didn’t know who he was

NOTE: Another thing I grasped from the previous transcript is that after approximately three weeks of consistent work on reducing drugs following that scalp surgery Debbie, Dr. Matzger and Michael managed to fully replace Demerol with a non-narcotic Toradol. In the days prior to the tour Michael had one quarter of the standard opiate patch on his body, was taking Toradol only and was receiving no injections.  

When Putnam asked him if Michael was proud of the progress he had made in getting off drugs, Debbie said that he was not a prideful person (ABC reported the opposite), but as to her she was very relieved to see him doing so well. This is why she was absolutely mad at Forecast when he gave Michael what she thought to be 100 milligrams of Demerol, starting it all over again and ruining all their work.

But this is what Debbie Rowe thinks what happened. She is blaming the arrogant Dr. Forecast for never following Dr. Metzger’s instructions,  and I cannot imagine what she would say if she knew that prior to Forecast another doctor on that tour, Dr. Finkelstein, who was Gongaware’s friend, did something much worse – he put Michael on a 24 hour drip of morphine which immediately overturned all the progress made and sent Michael into a disaster of an opiate dependency. For details of this please see the previous post.

Debbie saw Michael on the tour again after a 6 weeks interval. He was a completely different man:

Next time I met Michael in Mexico City and he was a mess, Rowe recalled.

Chang: He made an announcement to the world he needed to get help?

Rowe: Yes

Chang: Did you ever hear the name Paul Gongaware?

Rowe: I don’t know why I know the name.

Rowe said they would not allow her to talk to Forecast. Chang asked if she knew Forecast has been hired by the insurance company. Objection

Chang asked if tours caused MJ extreme stress or anxiety. She said yes.

Chang: Did he try to hide any drugs from you?

Rowe: Not that I know of.

Rowe: When I’d go to a concert and I was fortunate enough to be on stage, I’d see him.

"I'm so freaking lucky"

“I’m so freaking lucky”

MJ was my friend before anything else, Rowe said. “I’m so freaking lucky.”

It was just, it was surreal, because I wasn’t a fan, I was his friend first, Rowe explained.

Rowe: The show was amazing, the dancers were amazing, Michael was so physical when he’d do his performance.

Rowe: He’d still ask ‘how did I do, did I do ok?’ Really dude, you didn’t hear 55,000 people screaming? I think you did ok.

It was an athletic event to see him perform, Rowe explained.

Rowe said on “This Is It” MJ wasn’t performing, it was just a run-through of what he would do on the show.

Most important, he became a dad, Rowe said.

“He said doctors take the oath to do no harm. He was very loyal to his physicians.”

NOTE: Doctors are indeed a special profession – they take the Hippocratic oath and their obligation is to always remain doctors whatever circumstances they find themselves in. Office workers can very well forget about their duties in the hours off work but doctors have to be doctors everywhere they go and at any time too.

Knowing all that Michael trusted doctors very much and in her testimony at the trial Karen Faye confirmed that Michael very much believed and respected doctors:

May 9, 2013:

  • Michael always believed that a doctor had his best interest at heart. He always believed that if he had something from a doctor that it was safe.

June 28, 2013:

Q. Last time you were here you testified that Michael always thought that whatever doctors gave him, that would be okay. Do you remember that testimony?

A. Yes, sir.

Q. What was that based on?

A. That went way, way back, sir, you know. That was just like in a conversation that he always relied that doctors would be giving him, you know — would give him what was good for him, sir.

Q. So as you sit here today, you can remember having that type of conversation with Mr. Jackson in the ’80′s?

A. I just remember his attitude towards doctors, you know, a long time ago, you know. He read medical journals, he would bring them to photo shoots, so he would study, you know – he’d bring medical journals, anatomy books. I mean, he was — he read everything. He was quite a reader, and he studied many things. And, you know, I just remembered that, you know, somewhere in the beginning — in our conversations, like he believed that doctors, whatever they gave him or prescribed to him was okay.

MJ and Dr. Metzger

Dr. Metzger had Michael’s best interest. He  treated him as a patient, human being and friend

Rowe: I knew that the only one who had Michael’s best interest was Dr. Metzger. He treated him as a patient, human being and a friend.

Rowe said there worse type of medical care is:

- very rich: can buy it

- very poor: can’t afford any

- very famous: can dictate it

When it came to the pain he wasn’t dictating, it was begging for relief, Rowe described. “He trusted what doctors were doing.”

Rowe said she tried to tell MJ he allowed doctors to control him too much, he should not be submissive.

Chang: Was he treated like a cash cow?

Rowe: Yes

Chang: Was he engaged in doctor shopping?

Rowe: No

Rowe: There may have been, I don’t know. I had not really heard about doctor shopping, specially at the degree we have today, back then.

Chang said in 2000 MJ was seeing a lot of doctors. Rowe said he had his doctors in LA.

Rowe said she always instructed the nannies to have doctors on standby when they travelled and to keep notes of their treatment.

Chang: Did he have to search for doctors to give him drugs?

Rowe: No

Chang: In your opinion, when he saw doctors is because he needed it?

Rowe: That’s very general…

Rowe: Not every appointment was ‘I have to see a doctor.’ It was ‘I’m going to have a performance, I need to have collagen.’

Chang: Would you agree that MJ never sought after doctors just to get medication?

Rowe: Not that I know of.

Rowe said she is nosy, so she checked all the medications the doctors gave him.

Attorneys talked over each other objecting. “I feel their pain,” Rowe said pointing to the jurors.

Regarding Hoefflin putting MJ down and not treating him, Rowe said: “I didn’t think I saw it, I saw it! I was there, I saw it!”

Rowe said that when she worked with Dr. Klein, MJ’s vitiligo got progressively worse.

Rowe said she would watch movies with MJ all the time. Sometimes they went to the movie theater, even though MJ had a theater at Neverland.

Rowe said MJ would call her and say “To Kill a Mockingbird” is on. “He was great friends with Gregory Peck,” she explained.

They didn’t know what schiferella was, so MJ told her lets call Gregory Peck. Peck explained a bunch of things of the movie to them.

Rowe said when MJ was very contemplative, they went to Forest Lawn (cemetery) over GriffithPark. “Michael loves sculpture,” she explained.

I never realized that’s a place he could go and it was quiet, and just be himself. It was nice, it was nice, Rowe recalled.

She said there wasn’t a bunch of people, he could go and hang out.

Rowe said that when he was feeling depressed, she took him out. There were a lot of impersonators in the 80-90s.

Rowe: I drive a Celica, really, MJ in a Celica?

Debbie and MJ eyes closed

A funny picture

Rowe: Then I hear from across the room ‘Debbie, do you know this? Then everyone knew who he was, the store was packed in 20 minutes.

Rowe locked herself in bathroom at Tower Records with MJ and called his security to pick them up. “I got in so much trouble,” she recalled.

Rowe: He said you should incorporate horses with your love of animals. He paid for me to go back to school.

Rowe: In concerts, those girls will kill you to get near the stage – fans laughed in overflow room

He helped whoever he could Rowe said.

Rowe said security would give watches and rings. MJ would pick a girl to dance with him. “I thought that was so sweet.”

Chang showed video of woman on stage hugging Michael during “You’re Not Alone” song. Rowe cried watching it.

He had difficulty to sleep anywhere, it wasn’t just a tour problem, Rowe said.

Rowe: “I’d see him go 4 days without sleep because he was thinking of a song or a project he wanted to do.”

Chang: Fournier never gave MJ anesthesia for just sleep, right?

Rowe: Correct

Around 1997, near the end of tour, he uses Propofol to sleep in Munich.

Chang: MJ never sought out anesthesiologist just for the purpose to sleep prior to that, correct?

Rowe: Yes

Rowe: After HIStory he couldn’t sleep, he talked to me and I said he had to talk to Metzger.

Chang asked about the conversation Rowe and MJ had with Dr. Metzger about him not sleeping while in Germany.

There were 2 anesthesiologists that came over, Rowe said. They brought in heart monitor and equipment to the hotel, didn’t hide anything.

Chang: Based on your observations, he never asked for medication to sleep?

Rowe: Not that I knew of.

Rowe: I discussed with, I can assume that Dr. Metzger had a discussion with these doctors about what they were going to do.

Chang: Outside the US, do they use Propofol to treat insomnia?

Rowe corrected: It was Diprivan.’ same medication

I knew they were anesthesiologists, they had practice in Munich. I don’t know if they had gone to hotels to do this, Rowe said.

In 1996, the law prohibited the use of any anesthesia outside a surgical center.

Chang: You would not allow any illegal procedure in the hotel room, correct?

Rowe: Yes. Not knowing.

Rowe said the doctors had physicians desk reference book with them. They told Michael there was risk, including death.

Rowe: My fear in addition to harm, it was because he was clean, this was after he went to rehab.

I didn’t want anything they were giving him to affect his addiction to demerol, Rowe testified.

Rowe said doctors were very detailed, kept medical records. If she didn’t feel comfortable, she wouldn’t have allowed treatment to take place

Debbie and MJ 14This was 5 months after Prince was born, Rowe recalled. “They told me that anything more than 4 hours they had 2 physicians.”

It took some planning to put the equipment together, Rowe said.

Chang: Did he ever say bring the equipment in the dark in the middle of the night through an alley?

Rowe: He came through the front door

Chang: And security brought them up?

Rowe: I don’t believe anyone ever come up without security.

The doctors were there on 2 occasions, with all the same equipment.

Sometimes Michael would get IV for dehydration after shows, Rowe said.

Chang: He used IVs for fluids, vitamins while on tour, right?

Rowe: Yes

Chang: Based on your observations on that tour, Mr. Jackson wasn’t asking medication to get high?

Rowe: No.

He didn’t like being high, Rowe testified.

Chang: During the 20 years you were friends not habit of diprivan or any anesthesia to sleep?

Rowe: Not that I know

NOTE: Well, all that vitamins require is a portable IV only.  But the scene of two doctors coming through the front door with a ton of medical equipment is different and it suddenly reminded me that the manager of the History tour was no other but Paul Gongaware.

GONGAWARE AGAIN

Gongaware replaced Marcel Avram on the second leg of the tour as Avram went to jail for some tax fraud (what a nice pack of people these concert promoters are).

Okay, but if the doctors brought their equipment openly and took it away in the similar manner and did it on two occasions too, how is it possible that Gongaware as the tour manager didn’t know of it?

Just imagine it – the History tour did not have their own doctor, Michael gave no indication of taking any drugs (he really didn’t take any, he was absolutely clean) and he was giving sensational shows as Gongaware said in his testimony –  and here out of the blue two German doctors arrive with a ton of medical equipment, enter the front door, bring it over to Michael’s room, stay there until morning, 8 hours later take the equipment back and do it twice, and the tour manager does not know about it?

If you were the manager of the tour would you know? You and I would, and it is only Gongaware who has no idea, though he says that on the History tour he worked directly with Michael:

May 28, 2013 Gongaware’s testimony:

Q And sir, you then became a tour executive for the second leg of the History Tour, right?
A That’s right.
Q And the first leg you worked with Marcel Avram, is that right?
A Yes.
Q And the second leg, did you become then a tour executive?
A Yes. On the second leg I was working directly for Michael.

May 31, 2013:

Q. During the second half of the tour, did you ever come to have an understanding as to whether Mr. Jackson had a doctor traveling with him?

A. He didn’t.

Q. And would you know if he did?

A. Yes.

Q. And during the second half of the tour, did you ever come to have an understanding as to whether Mr. Jackson saw any doctors on locations during the second half?

A. Not that I know of.

Q. Was there a tour doctor on that tour?

A. No.

Q. No personal doctor, no tour doctor, to your knowledge?

A. None.

Q. Did you see Mr. Jackson perform on the “History” tour?

A. Yes.

Q. How were his performances, in your opinion?

A. Great.

Q. You say that with some oomph. Why is that?

A. He was sensational.

Q. Did he seem healthy to you?

A. Yes.

Q. To your knowledge as you sit here today, did Mr. Jackson miss any shows during the “History” tour?

A. He only missed one, and that was when Princess Diana passed away. He went to bed at night he knew about the accident, went to bed, the last thing he heard was she was going to be OK, and woke up in the morning, and she’d passed away, and it affected him deeply.

Q. So as you sit here today, you can only recall him missing one during the tour, correct?

A. That’s the only one I know of, yeah.

Now AEG lawyers will surely say that those two German doctors bringing in Diprivan for MJ were a “dark secret” of Michael Jackson, but how could it be a secret if everyone around him knew about it including the hotel personnel? Well, I can assume that Gongaware did not know the specific substance that was given to MJ on those two occasions, but the fact that he had trouble sleeping before the show and was given something was surely absolutely no secret for any of them.

Gongaware simply turned a blind eye on what the doctors were doing to MJ – for this concert mafia anything is good as long as the singer can stand on his feet and perform. As to the rest of it – “they don’t know, they don’t see, they don’t care”, so I will never believe that Gongaware didn’t know. He did.

Since now Gongaware has become a sort of a fixed idea with me, I also looked up his testimony about the Dangerous tour and the two doctors who “took care” of Michael there, and to my great amazement found that Gongaware fully confirmed everything I wrote about his friend Finkelstein in the previous post.

Unfortunately Mr. Panish didn’t allow Gongaware to disclose any details (due to “hearsay” rule), but even the little he said is enough to confirm that it was Finkelstein who was the first to “treat” Michael Jackson in Bangkok and who therefore ruined all the hard work done by Debbie Rowe, Dr. Metzger and Michael Jackson himself to replace narcotic painkillers with simple anelgetics.

And it is Finkelstein (now testifying for AEG) who is fully responsible for everything that happened to Michael on the Dangerous tour – the cancellation of the tour, the rehab and the many millions of damages he had to pay to the tour promoter Marcel Avram,  and it is no other but his friend Gongaware who is confirming it. Amazing stuff.

Gongaware’s testimony on May 30, 2013:

Q. And were there any doctors on that tour, Sir?
A. Yes, two.
Q. Now, one of them was named Dr. Forecast, correct?
A. Yes, that was Michael’s physician.
Q. What do you mean by –
A. That he worked strictly with Michael Jackson.
Q. And how do you know that?
A. I don’t know how I knew it, but that was the case.
Q. Well, did you ever talk to him?
A. Sure.
Q. Did he ever discuss with you in any way what his treatment was with Mr. Jackson?
A. No.
Q. Do you have an understanding as to whether — sorry — whether Dr. Forecast treated anybody else on the tour?
A. I don’t think he did. That’s why Dr. Finkelstein was out there.
Q. Do you have any understanding as to why Dr. Forecast was on the tour treating Mr. Jackson?
A. No.
Q. What party was Dr. Forecast in, if you remember?
A. He was — he would have been in A party.
Q. And you said the other doctor was the one that you know, Stewart Finkelstein, correct?
A. Yes.

Q. And you called him the tour doctor. What do you mean by that?

A. He was — we were going to just some strange — I wouldn’t call it strange, just different locations where we didn’t really know about quality of medical care, and so he was out there just to make sure everyone was taken care of.

Q. Now, was he in the A party?
A. No, he was in B party.

Q. B party. And I believe you said this, but let me ask, did you have an understanding at the time as to what type of doctor Dr. Finkelstein was?

A. Sure. He was a general practitioner.
Q. You also mentioned that he was your doctor, personal doctor, is that correct?
A. Yes, he was.

Q. Did you have an understanding as to whether or not Dr. Finkelstein was — had come on the tour to treat Michael Jackson?

A. That wasn’t the reason he was hired.
Q. Okay. What was your understanding as to why he was hired?
A. To take care of the B, C and D parties.
Q. Did you — did you ever see Dr. Finkelstein treat Michael Jackson?
A. Never saw him do that, no.
Q. Did you ever see Dr. Forecast treat Michael Jackson?
A. No.
Q. Have you ever seen any doctor treat Michael Jackson?
A. No.

Q. Now, did — during the time of the tour, the Dangerous Tour, can you recall Dr. Finkelstein ever mentioning to you that he treated Michael Jackson?

A. There were two times that he told me he did.
Q. Okay. Let’s ask about the first. What’s the first time?

A. Well, the first one was in Bangkok. We went in there — Michael hadn’t rehearsed at all, and we went in there, and he — it was like 100 degrees heat and 100 percent humidity, and he — he did the show, he nailed it. And then after that, we were supposed to do — take like a day off and do a second show in Bangkok before we moved on, and we couldn’t do the second show. Michael was — he wasn’t able to do it. Not — not right away, not as scheduled.

Q. And that didn’t answer my question, so I’m curious. My question was whether you had any understanding as to whether Dr. Finkelstein ever treated Mr. Jackson — yeah, Mr. Jackson.

A. That — I think that’s part of it. So when it — when the show was like postponed, we just said — I guess the management said we’re not going to be able to do the second show, we’re moving on, because I think the next show was in like Taipei, something like that. Maybe it was Singapore. But it was another country. And I didn’t understand why, you know, it was being cancelled, but the — but the King of Thailand said, “You’re not leaving until you play that second show because that’s when my friends are coming,” So he put like soldiers on the doors of the hotel to make sure we weren’t leaving. So at that point, you know –

Q. I’m going to have to ask it again. I apologize. Does Dr. Finkelstein come into this?
A. Yes, doctor — sorry.

Q. It’s all right.

A. I’ll get to it, I guess. Dr. Forecast wasn’t there then, he hadn’t arrived yet, so Dr. Finkelstein was pressed into service to treat Michael Jackson.
Q. All right. And so in Bangkok, you understood that Dr. Finkelstein, in some measure, treated Michael Jackson?

A. Yes.
Q. All right. Did he tell you the specifics of what he did?

Mr. Panish: That would be calling for hearsay.

Judge: Sustained.

Mr. Putnam: All right.

Q. Did you have an understanding as to what his treatment was?

Mr. Panish: It would call for hearsay.

Judge: It probably will. Sustained.
Q. Did you have an understanding as to any other time that Dr. Finkelstein treated, in any measure, Mr. Jackson?
A. Yeah, there was one other time he told me that he did.
Q. And when was that?

Mr. Panish: Same thing, your honor.

Q. Did you ever hear any details — I’m not asking what they were, I’m asking did you ever hear any details about that — those treatments?
A. No.

The story about “not knowing the details” is a lie because in his testimony Finkelstein said he always discussed things with Gongaware and I will never believe that he didn’t tell him what he was doing to Michael during those 24 hours while he was treating him to Morphine! From someone else he could conceal it, but from his old friend he sure wouldn’t.

Now Gongaware says that he heard of any drugs on the Dangerous tour only from Michael’s announcement on TV which is a joke that isn’t even funny:

Q. We were talking about Mr. Finkelstein during the Dangerous Tour, correct, sir?
A. Yes.
Q. All right. During the Dangerous Tour, not after, during it, did you ever come to have an understanding that Mr. Jackson had a problem with drugs?
A. No.
Q. Did you, during the Dangerous Tour, ever come to have an understanding that Mr. Jackson had a problem with painkillers?
A. No.
Q. Was the Dangerous Tour cut short, sir?
A. Yes.
Q. And where was it cut short?
A. Mexico city.
Q. And did you have an understanding as to why it was cut short?

A. After it — afterward, Michael made a statement that he had a problem.

Let me tell you one thing. These mafia concert promoters know everything inside out only they don’t give a damn as long as the performer is able to perform.

Moreover they even assume that a performer takes drugs to be able to cope with the incredible schedules they set up for them. It’s “business” for them, you know, and all they care about is that the show must go on. The more dates they squeeze out of the performer and the more tickets they sell the better it is, and how the artist deals with all the strain is none of their business.

I don’t know about others but as to Michael Jackson that was exactly the case. It is because all these people were sure that he was “doing something” and thought the worst of him that they overlooked his real health problem – lack of biological sleep of which he was slowly dying.

With so terrible preconceptions a person can die of a heart attack in full view of everyone but no one will help him because they’ll think that it is a withdrawal symptom and all he needs is a “straight jacket” and “tough love” which this rotten Randy Phillips demanded for poor Michael.

DAD AT LAST

After that Rowe’s testimony went over to personal matters,  and it’s good that it did as all this AEG’s business is becoming really too much for me.

Chang: Did you have discussions he wanted to be a father?

Rowe: He loved kids, he did.

Rowe: He was devastated after the divorce, I was trying to help. What does make you the happiest? ‘I want to be a father’ he said.

Rowe said she told him he could still be a father. They talked about it and then… it happened.

Debbie and MJ on a bike

MJ is in full make-up for Ghosts. Imagine him running in the tarmac screaming with happiness that he would finally be a dad. This must have been quite a sight

He always had crews with him to document stuff, Rowe said.

She took him for a ride and took him to a tarmac and said I need to talk to you.

I said you’re going to be a dad, Rowe said, sobbing.

“He was so excited, he ran out in the tarmac screaming.”

Chang asked if he bought all the books around. Rowe said he was a big reader anyway. “He wanted to be the best dad he could be” she recalled.

Rowe said she asked Michael to make two cassettes for Prince, she wanted the baby to hear his voice.

I had a headset over my stomach so baby could hear him, so the baby knows who you are, Rowe described. “They knew his voice.”

Chang showed pictures of Dr. Metzger and Rowe/MJ in Sydney during wedding, MJ, Debbie and kids.

He was amazing, Rowe said about MJ as a father. Rowe told Michael Paris was going to have him around her little finger.

"He was an amazing father"

“He was amazing as a father”

Rowe: Before anybody knew I was pregnant with this baby, he was shopping for clothes, would donate some times.

I was pregnant, he was picking clothes for his own children, Rowe said.

Chang: Did you make a decision to leave the children with Michael?

Rowe: Yes

C: Ever regretted it?

R: No

Rowe: Michael wanted to be a father. I didn’t sign on to be a mom. I loved him very much, and I still do.

Rowe: I wanted him to be a father, to have everything he didn’t have growing up, to experience it with this own children.

Chang: To have a full childhood?

Rowe: Yes

Chang: Did you think MJ would be a good father?

Rowe: I never questioned that he wouldn’t be.

Chang: Do you still love them?

Rowe: I’m so proud of them.

Chang asked how MJ looked in the This Is It movie. “He looked horrible,” she responded.

Rowe learned about MJ’s death on the radio, she was driving home.

Rowe said she saw Prince at least once after MJ died. “We don’t hate each other,” she said. But she’s closer to Paris.

Rowe said at the end of March, April started seeing Paris, talked on the phone every day. “She stayed weekends with me,” Rowe testified.

"Their father is dead"

“Their father is dead”

Their father is dead, an emotional Rowe said. “When I saw the tour come out, the schedule…”

I almost lost my daughter, Rowe said, sobbing on the stand.

She is devastated, she tried to kill herself, she is devastated. She has no life, she doesn’t’ feel like she has a life anymore, Rowe said

Rowe left the courtroom sobbing.

Judge broke session for a couple of minutes.

My children were never a sacrifice, Rowe said.

In re-direct, Rowe said Dr. Klein treated MJ for acne, lupus, scarring and vitiligo.

Rowe said she wasn’t present when Michael had Botox because when she worked at Dr. Klein it had not been FDA approved yet.

Putnam: Did he use Diprivan for collagen procedure?

Rowe: Yes

Rowe said it was just Demerol when collagen was injected around the mouth area.

But when injection was under the eye, it was painful, that’s when we started the anesthesia, Rowe explained.

Rowe said she asked Michael Jackson are you here because you really need collagen, or why are you here.

I didn’t understand why he would come twice for collagen when he just had it done, Rowe questioned.

This was early 90s. She was concerned MJ was coming in for the drugs.

Putnam: You grew concerned about Diprivan intake, approached Klein?

Rowe: That was Demerol, I called Dr. Metzger, I was concerned about Demerol. Dr. Metzger said up Vistaril, lower Demerol.

Putnam: Did you ask Dr. Klein Michael was addicted to Diprivan because of frequency he was using it?

Rowe: Yes. Late 80s, early 90s.

Rowe said Michael called her while he was in rehab in England. She said she told him she was working, since normal people worked.

She told him he had to stop everything. He said he was working on it.

Putnam: Including Diprivan?

Rowe: Yes, everything

P: In 1993?

R: Yes

HIStory tour was 96-97, Munich.

Putnam: Metzger had Jackson’s interest in mind?

Rowe: Yes

Rowe said Dr. Metzger directed her to bring a bag of medication to the Peninsula Hotel for Dr. Forecast.

Dr. Klein went to HIStory tour to do collagen touch ups, acne treatment. He gave MJ Demerol.

I was told you can’t become addicted to Diprivan, Rowe testified. She said it was an anesthesia.

Before you go to sleep, there’s a bit of loss of control, she explained. “I was worried that sensation might trigger an addiction.”

He was a bit of a control freak, he didn’t like to be high, Rowe said.

Rowe: I was just worried that part of the anesthesia would kick in. I was told you can’t become addicted to it.

Rowe: Dr. Metzger wanted to try Xanax and Michael said that hadn’t work. I said you need to talk to each other and let me know what to do.

Debbie and MJ 10

When he was with Debbie Michael sometimes wore a ring

After the divorce, Rowe never talked to the doctors about Michael’s treatment anymore.

Putnam: After 2000, whatever happened to Mr. Jackson you don’t have first knowledge?

Rowe: Correct

In re-cross, Chang questioned: When you asked Dr. Klein if anyone could be addicted to diprivan, he said no, correct?

Rowe: Yes

Chang: Was the bag of medication to wean MJ off Demerol before 1993 rehab?

Rowe: Yes

Chang: Did he do everything he could to be the best?

Rowe: He did

Rowe was excused.

MEDIA COVERAGE

The media reports about Debbie’s testimony covered only a small fraction of what she said. No proper mention was made of the surgery on Michael’s head and I am afraid that the general public most probably did not even grasp the enormity of the problem.

I don’t remember anyone stressing the point that Michael’s use of painkillers was fully legitimate and actually the only way out in that situation. Little detail was also provided of the hard work done by Rowe, Dr. Metzger and Michael himself to reduce his dependency of painkillers.

No, most of it was a combination of several phrases reshuffled back and forth in one and the same standard manner. By the way the headlines alone make it clear that the nastiest and closest to tabloids is the LA Times: 

Debbie Rowe cries during testimony

Wednesday, August 14, 2013

By Miriam Hernandez and Christina Salvo

LOS ANGELES (KABC) — Michael Jackson’s ex-wife Debbie Rowe took the stand Wednesday in the pop icon’s wrongful death trial, crying as she described Jackson’s fear of pain.

It took a subpoena to bring Rowe, mother to Prince and Paris Jackson, to court to testify for the defense. Prosecutors questioned Rowe about Jackson’s drug use when they were a couple. AEG attorneys want to show that Jackson had drug problems as far back as the early 1990s.

Rowe was a nurse assistant to dermatologist Arnold Klein, who she said provided the painkiller Demerol and Propofol for many of the hundreds of treatments Jackson received over 20 years.

According to records in evidence, Klein was treating Jackson up until three days before his death.

Rowe broke down on the witness stand, describing Jackson as a victim of doctors competing over a celebrity patient.

Michael respected doctors immensely,” she testified. “Unfortunately, some of the doctors decided that when Michael was in pain, that they would try to outdo each other, who could give the better drug.”

Rowe identified the doctors as Klein and plastic surgeon Steven Hoefflin.

“These idiots were going back and forth the whole time and not caring about him,” Rowe said.

Rowe testified that Jackson had trouble sleeping, but always seemed to be able to sleep after a doctor’s appointment. She said his use of pain meds started with his accident in 1984, when his scalp burned filming a Pepsi commercial.

In 1993, she described a painful surgery to stretch his scalp and remove scar tissue. Even though the surgery happened three years before Jackson wed Rowe, she was present during the surgery. She said Jackson asked her to be present to make sure everything was OK.

“Michael had a very low pain tolerance,” Rowe said as she began to cry. “His fear of pain was incredible.”

Klein and Hoefflin, she said, were providing powerful drugs — to the point she consulted with Jackson’s internist. She testified that Dr. Allan Metzger designed a plan to wean Jackson off the meds.

She told the jury that another doctor foiled the effort as Jackson left on the Dangerous World Tour, and that he rejected Metzger’s directions. Later that year, Jackson announced he was cutting his Dangerous World Tour short to enter rehab.

“My friends and doctors advised me to seek professional guidance immediately in order to eliminate what has become an addiction. It is time for me to acknowledge my need for treatment in order to regain my health,” Jackson said in a recorded statement at the time.

Rowe returns to the witness stand on Thursday.

AEG is trying to show that Jackson’s use of medications and prescription drugs was habitual, and that his death, in part, was caused by his own behavior.

The lawsuit, brought by Katherine Jackson and the pop star’s three children, claims that AEG was negligent in Jackson’s death. Katherine Jackson claims that AEG executives pressured her son to perform and, at the star’s request, hired Dr. Conrad Murray.

http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=news/entertainment&id=9206174

Jackson’s ex-wife testifies about his fear of pain

By ANTHONY McCARTNEY
— Aug. 14 9:18 PM EDT

LOS ANGELES (AP) — Michael Jackson’s ex-wife broke into tears on Wednesday when she took the witness stand in a civil case and described the singer’s fear of pain and reliance on physicians.

Debbie Rowe said the pop star trusted doctors to prescribe pain medication to him, but they sometimes tried to outdo each other while losing sight of Jackson’s care.

“Michael had a very low pain tolerance and his fear of pain was incredible,” Rowe said. “I think the doctors took advantage of him that way.”

She said she was with Jackson when he received treatments from his longtime dermatologist Dr. Arnold Klein and from plastic surgeon Dr. Steven Hoefflin.

They would try to out-do each other, with each one prescribing different drugs while trying to persuade Jackson their recommendations were better to manage his pain, she said.

The doctors “were going back and forth the whole time, not caring about him,” Rowe told jurors.

Rowe is the mother of the singer’s two oldest children, Prince and Paris Jackson. She and the pop star were married from 1996 to 1999. Rowe also worked with Klein beginning in the late 1970s.

Rowe said she told another one of Jackson’s doctors, Allan Metzger, that she was concerned that Klein and Hoefflin were giving the singer too many medications.

“The only physician who ever did anything, the only physician who cared for Michael was Allan Metzger,” Rowe said, fighting back tears.

Rowe said Metzger arranged for two doctors to give Jackson the anesthetic propofol in Germany in 1997 when he complained that he couldn’t sleep during his “HIStory” tour.

On two occasions, the doctors brought medical equipment to Jackson’s hotel suite and monitored the singer while he was under the effect of the anesthetic for eight hours. The doctors warned Jackson about the dangers of using propofol, but Rowe said he disregarded the information.

“He was just more worried about not sleeping,” she said. Rowe said she would not allow the singer to get similar propofol treatments for sleep issues after the use in Germany.

Jackson died from an overdose of propofol that was administered by another physician in 2009.

Rowe also described efforts to wean Jackson off the painkiller Demerol after he had surgery in 1993 to repair damage to his scalp sustained when he was burned while filming a Pepsi commercial years earlier.

She said Metzger devised a plan to treat Jackson’s pain with different medications before he went on a leg of his “Dangerous” tour. Rowe lived with Jackson for three weeks to ensure he stayed on the regimen.

“At that point we were friends,” Rowe said. “He wasn’t a patient.”

She said Jackson knew he couldn’t take pain medications forever and needed a strong voice to get him off the drugs. “I’m probably one of the only people who said no to him,” Rowe said.

Rowe said the plan to break Jackson’s use of Demerol failed when a doctor who accompanied the singer on tour gave him the drug while overseas.

A phone message left at Klein’s office was not immediately returned. An email sent to Hoefflin’s former practice was returned, stating the plastic surgeon retired five years ago and no longer practiced medicine.

Rowe said Jackson respected doctors immensely because they went to school and vowed to do no harm to patients.

Katherine Jackson claims in her lawsuit that AEG Live failed to properly investigate the doctor later convicted of giving her son an overdose of propofol while he prepared for a series of comeback shows in 2009.

She sat in the front row of the courtroom and leaned forward in her seat during portions of Rowe’s testimony.

AEG denies it hired Conrad Murray or bears any responsibility for the singer’s death.

Marvin S. Putnam, the company’s lead defense attorney, said in opening statements that the case was about Jackson’s personal choices and his desire to use propofol as a sleep aid.

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/jury-hear-jacksons-ex-wife-debbie-rowe

Debbie Rowe: Michael Jackson used propofol to sleep in the 1990s

By Jeff Gottlieb and Matt Hamilton
August 15, 2013, 5:36 a.m.

Describing the King of Pop as being “at the end of his rope,” Michael Jackson’s ex-wife on Wednesday testified that the singer twice used the powerful anesthetic propofol as a sleep aid in the 1990s.

Debbie Rowe’s testimony in a Los Angeles courtroom was the first evidence in Jackson’s wrongful-death trial that the singer had previously used propofol — which eventually killed him — for a purpose other than medical procedures.

Rowe was called as a witness by AEG Live in the lawsuit filed by Jackson’s mother and three children. The Jacksons say that AEG negligently hired and supervised Conrad Murray, the cardiologist who administered the fatal dose of propofol to Jackson in June 2009 as he was rehearsing for a 50-concert comeback in London.

AEG says that the singer hired Murray and that any money the company was supposed to pay the doctor was an advance to Jackson.

On Wednesday, Rowe testified that while performing in Germany in the mid-1990s, she and Jackson called Dr. Allan Metzger, Jackson’s internist, complaining that the singer couldn’t sleep. She said Jackson told her that sleeping pills hadn’t worked and that “he was at the end of his rope.”

Metzger arranged for a German medical team to go to Jackson’s hotel suite in Munich. Rowe said the two Germans brought enough equipment that the hotel room resembled a surgical suite.

Rowe said her husband was unconscious for eight hours while the medical team monitored him. She said Jackson used the anesthetic again three days later, but it was the only time she witnessed the singer using the anesthetic for sleep.

Experts have testified that being unconscious from propofol is not the same as sleep.

Earlier in the day, Rowe portrayed the singer as being whipsawed between doctors who were competing to see who could give him the most powerful painkillers while she was trying to wean him from the drugs.

She spent much of her testimony describing drugs administered by dermatologist Arnold Klein, her employer, and plastic surgeon Steven Hoefflin, saying they would try to one-up each other by prescribing Jackson stronger drugs.

“These idiots were going back and forth the whole time, not caring about him,” she testified.

Rowe said she was with Jackson about 10 times when Hoefflin gave him propofol while undergoing various procedures, such as collagen and botox injections. She said Klein also gave him propofol.

“Michael had a very low pain tolerance, and his fear of pain was incredible, and I think the doctors took advantage of him that way,” Rowe said.

Rowe, the mother of Jackson’s two oldest children, spoke in colorful, folksy language and joked about her 60-mile drive to the downtown Los Angeles courtroom. But she also flashed anger at an AEG attorney and cried several times.

She portrayed herself as the singer’s best friend and guardian. “He trusted people — foolishly, foolishly trusted a lot of people,” she said as Jackson’s mother nodded in agreement.

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-debbie-rowe-michael-jackson-propofol-20130815,0,6454650.story

As usual Alan Duke provided the most details:

Michael Jackson’s ex-wife testifies

Debbie Rowe forced to testify about singer’s drug use

By Alan Duke CNN

POSTED: 03:08 AM PDT Aug 14, 2013 UPDATED: 04:40 PM PDT Aug 14, 2013

LOS ANGELES (CNN) - Debbie Rowe, who is the mother of Jackson’s two oldest children, is being forced to testify about the singer’s drug use by lawyers for AEG Live, the concert promoter being sued by members of Jackson’s family, who say the promoter is responsible for his death.

Doctors “would try to outbid” each other on who could giveMichael Jackson ”the better drug” for his pain, Rowetestified Wednesday.

Jackson family matriarch Katherine Jackson sat Wednesday morning in the front row of the small courtroom, where she has spent much of the past 16 weeks watching the trial.

Dr. Allen Metzger – Jackson’s general practitioner in the United States — arranged for the German anesthesiologists to infuse the singer with propofol in a Munich hotel in July 1997 after sedatives failed to help him sleep between concerts, Rowe testified.

“I think they tried it and it hadn’t worked and if he couldn’t sleep, he couldn’t perform,” she testified.Jackson ”was at the end of his rope; he didn’t know what else to do.”

He “felt better” after eight hours of propofol-induced sleep and decided to get a second treatment after his second Munich show, she said.

Metzger testified at the criminal trial of Dr. Conrad Murray that he was never involved in giving propofol treatments for Jackson and was not aware of the drug until much later.

Rowe, who met Jackson when she worked as a nurse in the Beverly Hills office of Dr. Arnold Klein, backed away from her previous statement at her deposition in which she said doctors also gave Jackson propofol infusions in hotels in France during the HIStory tour.

AEG Live contends that Jackson used propofol for years to treat his insomnia, including when Rowe was traveling with him in Europe in the 1990s.

The coroner ruled Jackson died on June 25, 2009, from a propofol overdose administered by Murray, who is serving a prison sentence for involuntary manslaughter.

Rowe testified that Jackson underwent surgery in 1993 to repair burns suffered years earlier.

His doctors “couldn’t get a grip of the pain” and that two doctors “were having a pissing contest over who gave him the better drug.”

“Michael had a very low pain tolerance, and his fear of pain was incredible,” Rowe testified. “And I think that doctors took advantage of him that way.”

Rowe has rarely given interviews since her divorce from the pop icon, although she did testify in her former husband’s defense during his child molestation trial in 2005. Jackson was acquitted on all charges in that case.

Jackson lawyers smiled as the trial recessed for the lunch break, indicating that they believed the defense witness was actually supporting their case.

“Michael respected doctors immensely, that they went to school, that they studied and to do no harm,”Rowe said. “Unfortunately, some of the doctors decided that when Michael was in pain or something that they would try to outbid on who could give him the better drug and so he listened to those doctors.”

Rowe said many of the doctors who treated Jackson were “idiots,” including the dermatologist she worked for from 1979 until she quit in 1996 before she married Jackson.

“The only physician who ever cared for Michael as Michael was Allen Metzger,” Rowe testified.

“So Metzger continued as his doctor?” AEG Live lawyer Marvin Putnam asked.

“I don’t know, because Conrad Murray got in there and killed him,” Rowe replied — a reference to the doctor AEG Live is accused of hiring.

AEG Live executives, who were promoting and producing Jackson’s comeback concerts, had no way of knowing that Murray was infusing him with propofol each night for two months in the spring of 2009, Putnam said.

“Almost no one knew until after his death,” he said. “AEG Live certainly didn’t know about it.”

The Jackson family’s lawyers contend that the promoters ignored warning signs that Jackson’s health was deteriorating during the two months before his death. Instead of getting him to another doctor who might have saved his life, they gave Murray the responsibility of getting Jackson to rehearsals, they argue.

Michael Jackson’s mother and three of her children contend AEG Live is liable in his death because it negligently hired, retained or supervised Murray. The company’s agreement to pay Murray $150,000 a month put the doctor in a conflict of interest because he was in deep debt and could not risk losing the job by refusing Jackson’s demands for propofol, their lawyers contend.

AEG Live argues that while its executives negotiated with Murray to serve as Jackson’s physician for the “This Is It” tour, it was Jackson who chose and controlled the doctor.

One revelation from Rowe was that a Beverly Hills plastic surgeon faked doing a procedure on Jackson on two occasions, although he told the singer he had done it. Jackson complained about painful scars in his nose and went to Dr. Steven Hoefflin to inject them with collagen, she said.

“He put Michael out and didn’t do anything but put tape on him as if he had treated him,” Rowe testified. The doctor told her he did that because he could not find the scars Jackson thought were there.

Wednesday is the 69th day of testimony in the trial, which the judge told jurors would likely be given to them for deliberations in late September.

http://www.keyt.com/lifestyle/entertainment/Michael-Jackson-s-ex-wife-testifies/-/17653428/21460722/-/item/1/-/5jb1gd/-/index.html

Debbie Rowe: Paris Jackson ‘has no life’ since father’s death

By Alan Duke, CNN

updated 3:22 PM EDT, Thu August 15, 2013

Paris and Debbie. Spring 2013

Paris and Debbie. Spring 2013

Los Angeles (CNN) – The mother of Michael Jackson’s two oldest children broke down in tears when she was asked to describe the impact of the singer’s death on his daughter Paris.

“Their father is dead,” Debbie Rowe responded. “I almost lost my daughter! She is devastated. She tried to kill herself. She is devastated. She has no life. She doesn’t feel she has a life anymore.”

Paris, 15, attempted suicide in early June and is still being treated in a facility for her emotional problems.

Jurors sitting for a 70th day of testimony in the wrongful death trial of Jackson’s last concert promoter have laughed loudly at time during colorful testimony of Rowe, who alternated between tears and jokes.

When she and Jackson divorced after their three-year marriage in 1999, the singer “got custody of the doctors,” she joked Wednesday.

Rowe returned to the witness stand Thursday for a second day of testimony in the small Los Angeles courtroom. She was ordered to testify about the singer’s drug use by lawyers for AEG Live, the concert promoter being sued by Jackson’s mother and three children.

Wednesday’s questioning by AEG Live lawyer Marvin Putnam centered on Jackson’s use of prescription drugs — to deal with pain from scalp surgery, and two times in Germany, where doctors used the surgical anesthetic propofol to treat his insomnia.

Thursday’s testimony, however, began with Rowe’s description of Jackson’s skin problems, which included vitiligo — a condition in which his pigment disappeared, leaving large white spots on his face, hands and body.

“Everyone says he bleached himself, but he didn’t,” Rowe said. Many of his visits to Dr. Arnold Klein, the Beverly Hills dermatologist where she worked for 18 years as a medical assistant, were to treat the condition, she testified.

Jackson compared himself to the “Elephant Man,” a 19th-century Englishman who became a circus sideshow curiosity because of severe disfigurements, she said.

“He was worried that people would see the disease or the disfigurement before they would see him working sometimes,” Rowe testified.

He also suffered from discoid lupus, which made his skin tissue “mushy,” especially on his scalp, she said. Jackson’s scalp was severely burned during a pyrotechnics accident while he was filming a Pepsi commercial in 1984.

MJ’s insomnia struggle

Two German doctors treated Jackson’s insomnia with propofol 12 years before he died from an overdose of the surgical anesthetic, Rowe testified Wednesday.

Dr. Allen Metzger — Jackson’s general practitioner in the United States — arranged for the German anesthesiologists to infuse the singer with propofol in a Munich hotel in July 1997 after sedatives failed to help him sleep between concerts, Rowe testified.

“I think they tried it and it hadn’t worked, and if he couldn’t sleep, he couldn’t perform,” she testified. Jackson “was at the end of his rope; he didn’t know what else to do.”

He “felt better” after eight hours of propofol-induced sleep and decided to get a second treatment after his second Munich show, she said.

Metzger testified at the criminal trial of Dr. Conrad Murray that he was never involved in propofol treatments for Jackson and was not aware of the drug until much later.

Rowe backed away from her previous statement during a deposition, in which she said doctors also gave Jackson propofol infusions in hotels in France during the HIStory tour, in the late 1990s.

AEG Live contends that Jackson used propofol for years to treat his insomnia, including when Rowe was traveling with him in Europe in the 1990s.

The coroner ruled Jackson died on June 25, 2009, from a propofol overdose administered by Murray, who is serving a prison sentence for involuntary manslaughter.

AEG Live executives, who were promoting and producing Jackson’s comeback concerts, had no way of knowing that Murray was infusing him with propofol each night for two months in the spring of 2009, AEG lawyer Marvin Putnam said in his opening statements 16 weeks ago.
“Almost no one knew until after his death,” Putnam said. “AEG Live certainly didn’t know about it.”

The Jackson family’s lawyers contend that the promoters ignored warning signs that Jackson’s health was deteriorating in the two months before his death. Instead of getting him to another doctor who might have saved his life, they gave Murray the responsibility of getting Jackson to rehearsals, they argue.

Michael Jackson’s mother, Katherine Jackson, and three of her children contend AEG Live is liable in his death because it negligently hired, retained or supervised Murray. The company’s agreement to pay Murray $150,000 a month put the doctor in a conflict of interest because he was in deep debt and could not risk losing the job by refusing Jackson’s demands for propofol, their lawyers contend.

AEG Live argues that while its executives negotiated with Murray to serve as Jackson’s physician for the “This Is It” tour, it was Jackson who chose and controlled the doctor.

“Getting a grip’ on MJ’s pain

Jackson underwent surgery in 1993 to repair burns suffered in the 1984 accident, including placement of a balloon under his scalp to stretch it over several months, Rowe testified.

His doctors “couldn’t get a grip of the pain” the procedure caused and two doctors “were having a pissing contest over who gave him the better drug,” she said.

“Michael had a very low pain tolerance, and his fear of pain was incredible,” Rowe testified. “And I think that doctors took advantage of him that way.”

Rowe said many of the doctors who treated Jackson were “idiots,” including the dermatologist she worked for from 1979 until she quit in 1996 before she married Jackson.

“Michael respected doctors immensely, that they went to school, that they studied … to do no harm,” Rowe said. “Unfortunately, some of the doctors decided that when Michael was in pain or something that they would try to outbid on who could give him the better drug, and so he listened to those doctors.”

Metzger tailored a plan to help Jackson withdraw from dependence on demerol, a powerful painkiller given him because of the scalp pain, she said. That plan, however, was derailed when Jackson resumed traveling on his “Dangerous” tour, she said.

After six weeks, when the tour reached Mexico City (in autumn 1993), Jackson was “a hot mess,” she said.

“He was depressed,” she said. “He had taken something. I don’t know what he had taken or who he had got it from.”

After a three-day argument with Jackson, Rowe said, she convinced him to end his tour early and enter a drug rehabilitation program.

“You need to straighten up,” she said she told Jackson. “You need to face whatever it is that is going on and we’ll get through this.”

Jackson eventually announced publicly that he was entering a rehab program to deal with an addiction to prescription drugs.

Rowe said Jackson’s drug use was not a secret among people in the “Dangerous” tour production. AEG Live Co-CEO Paul Gongaware, who was the over the “This Is It” production when Jackson died, was also tour manager for the “Dangerous” tour.

One revelation from Rowe was that a Beverly Hills plastic surgeon faked doing a procedure on Jackson on two occasions, although he told the singer he had done it. Jackson complained about painful scars in his nose and went to Dr. Steven Hoefflin to inject them with collagen, she said.

“He put Michael out and didn’t do anything but put tape on him as if he had treated him,” Rowe testified. The doctor told her he did that because he could not find the scars Jackson thought were there.

Thursday is the 70th day of testimony in the trial, which the judge told jurors would likely be given to them for deliberations in late September.

http://www.cnn.com/2013/08/15/showbiz/jackson-death-trial/index.html?sr=sharebar_twitter

Debbie Rowe sobs on witness stand while describing daughter Paris Jackson’s ‘devastation’ after Michael Jackson’s death: ‘She doesn’t feel she has a life anymore’

BY NANCY DILLON / NEW YORK DAILY NEWS

THURSDAY, AUGUST 15, 2013, 5:27 PM

Rowe testified for a second day in the wrongful death trial pitting the King of Pop’s children and mom Katherine Jackson against AEG Live, the concert promoter behind his ill-fated ‘This Is It’ shows.

Michael Jackson’s ex-wife wailed in anguish on the witness stand Thursday as she described the “devastation” that nearly claimed her only daughter with the King of Pop.

“Their father is dead…I almost lost my daughter,” Rowe said through loud sobs when asked about the fallout from Jackson’s fatal overdose in June 2009.

“She is devastated, she tried to kill herself,” Rowe moaned, describing 15-year-old Paris. “She doesn’t feel she has a life anymore.”

When a lawyer for Katherine Jackson suggested that Michael’s death wasn’t something Rowe contemplated when she made the “sacrifice” of giving him full custody of their kids, the former dermatologist’s assistant snapped back.

“My children were never a sacrifice,” she said, breaking down to the point that she needed time to compose herself outside the courtroom.
Rowe, 54, testified for a second day in the wrongful death trial pitting Michael’s kids and mom Katherine Jackson against AEG Live, the concert promoter behind his ill-fated “This Is It” shows.

Katherine and the kids claim AEG should pay some $1 billion for negligently hiring the doctor convicted of providing the singer with the surgery-strength anesthetic that killed him.
AEG claims Michael hired Dr. Conrad Murray and had a secret history of using the anesthetic to treat his insomnia.

Paris’ early June suicide attempt – in which she reportedly took 20 Motrin pills and slashed her arm with a kitchen knife – came up after Rowe described her decision to bear Michael’s kids.

She said the “Thriller” singer was “devastated” when Lisa Marie Presley filed for divorce in 1996, and she wanted to ease his pain. Rowe said she asked him what made him “saddest,” and he said it was the fact they never had kids.

Debbie and Prince

“Let me have a baby with you… It took him a couple of weeks going back and fort. And then it happened”

“I said, ‘Let me have a baby with you,’” Rowe told the Los Angeles jury. “It took him a couple weeks going back and forth, thinking about it, and we talked about it.”

Rowe never elaborated on how they pursued conception, but she described in intimate detail the afternoon she rode her Harley Davidson motorcycle across the San Fernando Valley to meet Michael on the Van Nuys Airport set of his 1996 short film “Ghosts” and break the baby news.

Michael was getting ready to do a shoot, she recalled, but she convinced him to hop on the back of her Harley so they could find a private spot to talk.

“I said, ‘You’re going to be a dad!’ I was pregnant,” Rowe recalled. “He was so excited, he ran around the tarmac screaming.”
She said Michael recorded cassette tapes that she would play on headphones over her pregnant belly so the baby would know his voice.

“He was amazing,” she said of Michael’s performance as a new dad for Prince.

Rowe said Michael was equally over the moon when he learned that Paris was on the way.
“I told him, ‘You’re going to be so whipped,’” Rowe testified. “Before anyone knew I was pregnant with this baby, he was shopping for clothes.”

Rowe said she had no regrets about “leaving” the kids with Michael when their 3-year marriage ended in divorce in 1999.
“Michael wanted to be a father. I didn’t sign on to be a mom. I loved him very much and I still do,” she said, breaking down in tears. “I wanted him to be a father, I wanted him to have everything that he didn’t have growing up, wanted him to experience it with his own child, his own children.”
She agreed with Katherine’s lawyer that she “never” would have left the kids with Michael if she thought he was “a drug addict.”

In testimony Wednesday, Rowe portrayed Michael as the victim of unscrupulous doctors who tried to capitalize on his fear of pain and curry favor with copious amounts of narcotics.

She said the one doctor she trusted was internist Dr. Allan Metzger, the man who would act as Michael’s best man at their 1996 wedding in Sydney, Australia.

But under questioning by AEG’s lead lawyer Marvin Putnam, Rowe admitted that it Dr. Metzger who sent two German anesthesiologists to Michael’s Munich hotel room in 1997 to give the singer 8-hour anesthesia infusions to help him sleep.

She said Michael was desperate for sleep and told Metzger that Xanax wasn’t strong enough to do the job.
“He said he was at the end of his rope, he didn’t know what else to do,” she testified Wednesday.

“I said, ‘What happens if you die?’” she recalled. “(But) I don’t think he was worried about it. He was just more worried about not sleeping.”
Rowe said she stayed for much of the overnight treatment with propofol but had to go back and forth to care for 5-month-old Prince.
When Michael woke up, he claimed he was in better shape, she recalled.
“He said he felt better,” she said.
Under questioning by Katherine’s lawyer, Rowe said the treatment didn’t appear to be a dark secret.
She said the doctors brought their equipment through the front door of the hotel with the help of security.

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertain…icle-1.1428194

Here is Thomas Mesereau on the AEG trial:

Debbie Rowe on Paris Jackson: ‘She Doesn’t Feel She Has a Life Anymore’

By Suzy Byrne|omg!

Debbie Rowe was on the stand Thursday in Michael Jackson’s wrongful death lawsuit and broke down in tears talking about the impact his loss has had on their 15-year-old daughter, who attempted suicide in June and is still being treated in a facility for her emotional problems.

“Their father is dead. I almost lost my daughter. She is devastated. She tried to kill herself,” the 54-year-old former nurse testified. “She has no life. She doesn’t feel she has a life anymore.”

Saying those words out loud in the Los Angeles courtroom made Rowe emotional. She broke down in tears and then took a break to compose herself.

Rowe also spoke about their 16-year-old son, Prince, bluntly saying, “He doesn’t hate me if that’s what you mean.” However, she indicated she developed a special closeness with Paris as they have reconnected after Jackson’s 2009 death. “We started seeing each other in March and started talking each day,” she said. “She’s come to stay with me since.”

Her testimony also gave many personal insights into her relationship with Jackson, whom she befriended when she was employed by Jackson dermatologist Dr. Arnold Klein. She talked about how the superstar suffered from lupus, and wore light colored makeup to cover his vitiligo. She then shared the story about how it came to be that she had two children for him.

“He was devastated after [his] divorce [from Lisa Marie Presley]. He said, ‘I’ll never have a child,’” she recalled. “I said, ‘Let me have a child with you and give you the joy of being a father.’ When I [later] told him he was going to be a dad, he was so excited. He ran around screaming.”

Jackson was apparently a “big reader” and “bought every book he could” to prepare for fatherhood, according to Rowe. When she was pregnant and he was headed off on a tour, Jackson made “recordings of his voice and [I] would put the headphones on my stomach each night so the babies would know his voice,” she recalled.

When they had daughter Paris, Rowe recalled telling Jackson, “I said he was going to be so whipped. ‘She’s going to have you wrapped around [her] finger. All these plans you have to rule the world with Prince are not going to happen unless she says so.’”

Rowe did not talk about how the children were conceived, but she made it clear that she was having the kids for the singer. And when they later divorced, she relinquished her parental rights. (Jackson later added a third child to his brood; the identity of son Blanket’s mother is not public.)

As for whether she would leave her children with a man she believed to be an addict, she said simply, “No.”

Testimony continues in the trial with the judge telling the jurors they will likely begin deliberations in late September.

http://music.yahoo.com/blogs/celeb-news/debbie-rowe-paris-jackson-she-doesn-t-feel-141429996.html?cache=clear

THE THRILLER OF MICHAEL JACKSON’S LIFE

I hope it scares you, I hope it makes you laugh and makes you cryBut the best coverage of the period described above came from Michael Jackson himself.

It is a leaked film about making Ghosts which covers exactly the time we’ve been talking about and the period when Debbie was married to Michael Jackson.

Actually the episode where she takes Michael by her byke to tell him about her pregnancy is even part of this film.

I’ve long noticed that many of Michael’s short films are full-time prophesies mapping out the events which were only to take place in his life.

Indeed who could imagine that Michael would first show us his skeleton and skull in the literal meaning of this word, but then would come back to dance and talk to us again – at least in this film? And say things which makes it sound like he knew them of advance?

MJ as the mayorFor example that Mr. Establishment personified by the Mayor in the film will one day discover something of Michael Jackson inside himself and will be forced to dance the way he did and to his music too?

Now that people began reflecting on Michael Jackson’s life it seems that the collective Mr. Establishment is beginning to doubt that he was right in the way he treated Michael…

And who could expect that after his death Michael would talk to us from the screen and encourage us to be bold and innovative, and say “yes” even when everyone else says “no”?

“If the whole world says No, you say Yes!” – these are Michael’s words in the film.

I watched the film and couldn’t believe what I was seeing.

The first part of it is Michael’s thoughts on a great many things in life which still need to be put down and reflected upon, and the second part of it is the example of how tirelessly he was working on each of his movements and how long it actually took to create a dance. You think that it is already over but he repeats it again and again in complete silence to the sound of the beat only, and even take 32 is not yet the final one.

in a costume for a skeleton dance

MJ is wearing a costume for a skeleton dance

You see him dancing, you see him waiting, you see him tired, you see him lying on his side, you see him serious, you see him fooling about –  you see a lot of him the way you have never seen him before.

He will take his hat off and show himself with some short hair on his poor head. And all this time he will be wearing a tape on his nose.

But whichever way you see him the sight of it will be fascinating  and you won’t be able to take your eyes off the screen.

"I play the skeleton"

“I play the skeleton”

And the first part of the film will end with Michael addressing you directly.

He will speak with a light smile on his face and say things which sound terribly symbolic, amazing and a bit hair-raising, because to me it looked like he was talking not about the film but about his life:

I hope you enjoy it.

I hope it’s inspiring.

I hope it scares you.

I hope it makes you laugh and hope it makes you cry.

That’s all I wanted to achieve.

Just some real fun entertainment… 

 

No, Michael’s life is absolutely no entertainment to us, but a big thriller it sure is.


Filed under: BRIDGE To Understanding Michael, Jacksons vs. AEG Tagged: AEG, Debbie Rowe, Dr. Finkelstein, Ghosts, Michael Jackson, Paul Gongaware, vitiligo

Jacksons – AEG trial DAY 70. Dr.SLAVIT, INSURANCE and MURRAY as the TOUR cost in AEG EMAILS

$
0
0

While everyone seems to be following the lead of AEG in munching all those propofol stories let me continue to look into the heart of the matter which is absolutely not propofol irrespective of what they say. They are misplacing the focus intentionally.

Those who get easily bored are encouraged to skip everything and go straight to point 3 called “What animal is Tour expense?” while the rest will probably want the hear some details.

1. ‘SLAVIT IS THE CORRECT MAN TO DO THAT’

Dr. Slavit

“Dr. Slavit is the correct man to do that”

After Debbie Rowe’s testimony on August 15 a video deposition of Dr. David Slavit was shown. No one paid attention to it which is an extremely deplorable fact – Dr. Slavit is connected with the AEG insurance issues and the AEG insurances issues are key to this case.

Unfortunately the transcript of his deposition is not available on TeamMJ as they managed to obtain only a sidebar discussion concerning something else, so we’ll have to limit ourselves to the ABC News tweets only.

Thursday August 15, 2013 DAY 70 

Rowe was excused.

AEG called their next witness, Dr. David Hal Slavit, via video deposition. He’s a board certified otolaryngology.

He’s licensed to practice medicine in New York and New Jersey. He’s never been suspended.

Dr. Slavit performed physical exams in hundreds of patients. He has performed physical for purposes of insurance, he said.

He explained the difference of physicals: problem-focus, more complete and comprehensive.

Dr. Slavit has performed physical for performance cancellation insurance.

He said he checks vital signs, ear, nose, throat, neck, eyes, examination heart, lungs, abdomen and peripheral pulses.

Q: Who typically contact you for performance cancellation insurance?

Dr. Slavit said it’s usually insurance broker or artist management.

He said he’s done approximately 30 physicals for performance cancellation insurance, mostly for singers, but not all.

The majority of times, check comes from the insurance broker. He’s done physicals in hotels, rehearsal studios, artist’s home, office

Dr. Slavit said he’s done approximately 20 times for Robertson Taylor, insurance broker.

On Feb 4, 2009, Dr. Slavit conducted a physical on Michael Jackson in connection with a performance cancellation insurance.

Bob Taylor contacted Dr Slavit somewhere in the months prior to the physical. “He basically asked if I would agree to do the physical on MJ”

It was my understanding he was going to perform, Dr. Slavit said.

Yes, I requested to reviewed the prior 5 years of medical records, Dr. Slavit said. He wanted to be as accurate as possible.

I’d say it’s not typical, Dr. Slavit testified about getting 5 years prior of medical history, but he had done before other than MJ.

Dr. Slavit said this is done if there were prior questions of medical health.

There were questions that had been raised by the broker, Dr. Slavit said. He doesn’t know specifically what was asked.

Dr. Slavit said insurance broker questioned MJ’s breathing capacity, his pulmonary status and overall health.

Q: Nothing about prior drug abuse?

Dr. Slavit: Not that I recall.

The doctor did not ask anything else other than 5 years medical history. He said he was not limited in MJ’s examination at any time.

Dr. Slavit never received any MJ’s medical history, other than what the artist told him during examination.

Attorney showed documents doc prepared during and after the physical.

The physical was done at MJ’s house in Los Angeles, the doctor said.

Patient’s name on blood work request: Mark Jones. It’s an alias, Dr. Slavit said, just to protect Michael Jackson’s privacy.

Q: Did you find MJ to be in great physical condition?

A: Based on the informaiton I had, yes

Note on form says “today’s found Mr. Jackson to be in excellent condition.” It also says MJ had allergy and a bit of cold.

He was on short course of antibiotics, Dr. Slavit said, he’s not on any other medication.

Q: Did he tell you he was taking painkillers?

A: He told me he was not taking any painkillers.

He stated he was not taking any medications other than antibiotics, Dr. Slavit testified.

Dr. Slavit didn’t see anything that suggested MJ was not telling the truth. He didn’t find any typical signs of narcotic intoxication.

Dr. Conrad Murray follows Mr. Jackson on a regular basis, the form said.

Dr. Slavit explained Murray was identified by Mr. Jackson as his personal physician and reported seeing him as needed.

Dr. Slavit: He reported seeing him a couple of months prior to the physical just for check-up.

It was a routine check-up, Dr. Salvit said. MJ didn’t discuss the details of the visit.

Other than Dr. Kantor no one else was mentioned as providing care, Dr Slavit said.

Q: Did he tell you MJ said he liked Dr. Murray?

A: Yes

Q: Did he say he was a good doctor?

A: I don’t know if used that word

That he was caring for him, that he was satisfied with the care he was getting, that’s basically what he said, Dr. Slavit said.

Dr. Slavit’s form said MJ’s vital signs were normal. Heart sound was normal, no murmurs.

Dr. Slavit: I assessed his pulmonary status with stethoscope, no further pulmonary test done.

Q: Did you have difficulty drawing blood?

A: I had a little difficulty drawing blood.

He used MJ’s left arm, and took the specimen himself to the laboratory. Blood work result was normal consistent with MJ being in good health

Q: Was he capable of making decisions?

A: Yes

Form notes MJ was mature, open and candid with Dr. Slavit.

Q: Capable of control of his health?

A: Yes

Q: Why candid?

A: That’s the perception I got

Q: Was he lucid?

A: Yes

Q: Speech slurred?

A: No

Q: Tired?

A: No

Q: Did he say he had trouble sleeping?

A: He didn’t say he had trouble sleeping, he didn’t say he had insomnia.

Dr. Slavit: He denied any prior medical problem except for the cold.

Dr. Slavit wrote MJ was in good health, good diet and exercise. He interacted with his doctor for routine check ups.

MJ visited his laryngologist for minor issues, seemed proactive and attune to his health.

There was an acknowledgment of the need for rest or avoidance of exhaustion.

Q: Did MJ ask you to prescribe any medication?

A: No

Michael Jackson signed the forms. Dr. Slavit said he saw MJ sign it.

At the time of the examination the form was filled out with Michael Jackson. We reviewed the form before he signed it.

There are questions on the form that were filled out during the physical. Dr. Slavit said MJ was the only source of the responses.

Q: Was there any significant change of weight?

A: No

The question regarding excessive use of drugs or alcohol was circled ‘no’.

MJ told Dr. Slavit he was last examined a couple of months prior for routine. Dr. Murray was identified as personal physician.

When asked if he felt in good physical condition, Dr. Slavit said MJ responded yes. “That was his answer.”

Temperature was 98 degrees.

Weight: 127 lbs – MJ told him that’s what he weighed.

Q: Based on your examination, it appeared accurate?

A: Yes

Height was self reported also. He told Dr. Slavit he was 5 foot 9. Dr. Slavit received full payment for the physical on Michael Jackson.

Q: Did you notice any track mark on MJ when you examined him?

A: There were none

Q: Did you look his arms?

A: Yes

Q: His legs?

A: Yes

In the course of reviewing his past medical history there were no surgeries reported, Dr. Slavit said.

Dr. Slavit gave copy of the record to the Coroner pursuant to legal subpoena. Feb 2009 was the only time Dr. Slavit talked to MJ.

Dr. Slavit charges:

$5,849 for travel and hotel

$3,000 lab and supply

$6,000 for service

Dr. Slavit: My understanding my job was to find out if he was able physically to perform.

I was never provided records, Dr. Slavit said. He never contacted Dr. Murray directly to get medical record.

I would require permission from MJ to do that (test for opiates or drugs), Dr. Slavit said. There was no need at the time to test him.

Dr. Slavit had been working with Bob Taylor for about 10 years prior to doing physical with MJ.

Q: Did Mr. Taylor tell you MJ was being badly mauled in the press in England and that it was getting difficult to obtain insurance?

A: No

Dr. Slavit did not know where the rumors came from.

Q: Was it clear to you that MJ had plastic surgery?

A: Yes

Dr. Slavit said he examined inside MJ’s nose and how it looked.

Q: And did it look ok?

A: Yes

Dr. Slavit was at MJ’s house between 2.5 and 3 hours for the physical.

Q: If you had any suspicion that MJ was using opioids or other drugs improperly, you’d you have tested him?

A: I may have

Q: Did Mr. Jackson deny anything you requested of him?

A: No

That ended the testimony. Court was adjourned and jurors ordered to return today at 9:30 am PT.

Basically Dr. Slavit’s deposition is the admission of a very perfunctory examination of Michael Jackson – he assessed his pulmonary condition with a stethoscope only, checked the breathing of his nose, made some blood tests which did not include a test for drugs because he did not see any indication of drug use (which is perfectly true as Michael was not taking anything) and what’s much more important, Dr. Slavit didn’t make any tests of Michael’s condition under a physical strain like checking his pulse and breathing when running or carrying some weights.

For these services Dr. Slavit was paid $5,849 for travel and hotel, $3,000 lab and supply, and $6,000 for the work proper. This made $14,849 in total for a couple of hours and no one seemed to question why so big a sum was charged for so superficial an examination.

This makes us look into the background of the check and see what events were accompanying it. Fortunately the exhibits on the website of Mr. Panish and Mr.Boyle provide us with this opportunity. These are various emails sent back and forth between AEG and their insurance brokers. And these emails are telling a lot more than you expected.

1. First please compare the physical done by Dr. Slavit with the second one planned in London on July 6, 2009 and see the difference:

From: Burns, Justin

Sent: 22 June 2009

To: Ian France

Subject: Mark Jones

 

Ian

Further to our discussions, wide of the basic examination and bloods, etc.

The specialist examinations are required in order to fully assess the medical risks of the performer whom you are insuring.

Clearly his performance is very physical and we would want an expert musculoskeletal orthopaedic surgeon to advise on his ability after so many years without being on stage to perform, the person who would be involved is the most expert orthopaedic surgeon in UK and advised many high performance athletes.

In regard to his cardio and respiratory capacity the cpx measures heart lungs oxygen etc. and he would be wired up so that this can be performed with ecg leads and a mouth piece.

Further at this time the 2 specialists required for these tests are currently only available on the Monday morning, if the medical is to be any other time please advise URGENTLY.

Trust this helps

Kind regards

Justin

Then we go back half a year earlier to Shawn Trell’s email of January 9, 2009 (even before signing a contract with MJ) where Trell asks a perfectly legitimate question why they should pay $10,000 plus expenses for a doctor from New York if they can find one in Los Angeles and limit the cost:

From: Shawn Trell

Sent: 09 January 2009

To: Bob Taylor

Subject: Medical Exam

Bob… is it really necessary to incur $10K in expense to get his medical exam completed? I mean, we are in Los Angeles. Clearly there are reputable if not world renowned physicians here that have been used before for these purposes. Please advise. – ST

And the insurance broker explains why, answering with a sort of an encrypted text:

Yes there are people in LA but I do not want the insurers to have any doubt as the medical info provided. I feel that Slavit is key to this as the insurers really do trust him at the moment. If the cost is a problem I have already indicated that I would expect insurers to contribute as would RTIB.

I do not want to miss the window as if we get it wrong then the whole possibility of getting insurance could well be prejudiced. MJ is being badly mauled by the press here on the subject of his health and we have to refute that info which will not be easy. I believe that Slavit is the correct man to do that.

I am happy to try another LA based doctor but we have to both recognize the possible cost of that. If you decide on an LA man then he must be an independent with no past history with MJ. That in itself will not be easy.

Let me know what you want to do and if its not Slavit I will try to source someone in LA.

Best Bob<T

The hidden meaning of the above is not lost on Shawn Trell. His answer is:

“Got it. Please proceed”.

Slavit is correct man to do it

“Slavit is the correct man to do that” (click to enlarge)

Let us check up whether we also got the meaning of the above text which sounds to me like it needs to be read between the lines very much so.

Both of them are unsure of the results of the test and are afraid that they may “get it wrong”. If something goes wrong the possibility of getting the insurance will be lost, so they don’t want to “miss the window” with Dr. Slavit who is the “correct man to do that”.

If they try a LA doctor it will be difficult to find one who has never heard of Michael’s health problems or has never come into contact with MJ, so in case of a LA doctor they “have to recognize the possible cost of that”.

Let’s traslate it from English into English.

  • So getting an insurance policy is a matter of so crucial importance for AEG that it even requires encrypted language. Therefore the question why it is so terribly important for AEG will have to be kept in mind until the very end of the AEG trial.
  • The insurance is so important that they can’t get the medical examination required for it to go “wrong” and it should by all means be “right”.
  • To make it “right” the LA doctors are out of the question, but in case they are approached the broker warns that they should “recognize the possible cost of it” which probably means that getting the “right” conclusion from a doctor of high repute will cost a good deal of money. The other interpretation is that it may cost them losing the chance to get the insurance.
  • Therefore Dr. Slavit is suggested as the “correct” man to do the job. Actually the word “correct” is telling us all we need to know about the situation, isn’t it? And from the perfunctory way Dr. Slavit conducted his examination this doctor indeed proved that he can really be relied on in matters which require some “understanding”, didn’t he?

But here another question arises –  why was there so much fear on the part of the insurance broker and Shawn Trell about the possible outcome of the test? The options are not many to choose from – they either thought that Michael was in poor health as they saw him that way, or they suspected him to be a secret addict who would not  be able to pass the test unless the doctor closed his eyes on Michael’s “issues”.

But in order to think that he was a secret addict one needed to have at least some grounds for it – see him frail, ill or inadequate or at least know of Michael’s past problems, right? However this is exactly what now all AEG bosses categorically say they never saw or heard of. In fact if we listen to them Michael was in perfect health (this I don’t doubt, he really was) and the last time they heard of his problems with drug dependency was as long ago as 1993 only (this I doubt very much).

The reason for the doubt is that Bob Taylor rather cynically says to Shawn Trell that there is no doctor in LA who would not “have a past history” with Michael, and Trell agrees, and this betrays that both of them are perfectly familiar with some nasty gossip about MJ, possibly about drugs, and this is why they are determined not to allow a LA doctor to come near Michael Jackson.

All these hints perfectly coincide with the attitude to Michael displayed by Randy Phillips and all the rest of them during the several months of their tragic co-existence – they looked down on him as an addict who needed a “straight jacket” and “tough love” and on occasions had to be “scraped from the floor”, while Michael was absolutely not an addict and was simply suffering from lack of sleep which was a condition forced upon him by his AEG partners by the way.

2. The second point which attracts out attention about Dr. Slavit is the exorbitant cost of the lab analyses he billed for.

$3000 for a simple blood and possibly urine test which didn’t even involve a check for drugs? However the fact that he did not check for drugs is what Dr. Slavit says while another doctor – also speaking under oath – says something totally different.

The one who contradicts Slavit is Dr. Finkelstein. He was invited by Paul Gongaware to the This Is It tour and was assured by Gongaware that Michael was clean. Gongaware said that he was told about it by the doctor who conducted the test and the doctor who conducted the test was Dr. Slavit.

In the deposition aired on July 8th Finkelstein said:

A. I remember asking if he thought Michael was clean.

Q. You asked Mr. Gongaware that?

A. Correct.

Q. Ok, and what did Mr. Gongaware say?

A. He thought yes.

Q. You asked Mr. Gongaware if he thought Michael was clean. Mr. Gongaware said he thought he was.

A. He was clean.

Q. Ok, Tell me what else you remember about the conversations.

A. I wanted to know why he thought that. He said because he had a pre- — a physical from an insurance company and that he had passed it. I guess he was in contact with the physician that was currently with Michael, and that physician was telling him that everything was good and Michael was strong and ready to go.

And Dr.Slavit tells us that he didn’t even make those tests! He said that he required Michael’s consent to it, but didn’t even ask for it as he saw no indication of any drug taking. However the truth is that testing for drugs was Slavit’s specific task from AEG which is why AEG and the insurers were so fearful of the results, and the answer Dr. Slavit gave them was that Michael was clean and he indeed absolutely was.

Everything is twisted in this crooked AEG kingdom and everyone around them is lying like crazy now.  At this trial AEG is pouring a lot of mud on Michael and paints him as a terrible addict which they pretend they “never knew”. And the truth of the matter is that they did know of Michael past dependency on Demerol perfectly well which is why they specifically tested him for drugs, but found that he was clean. And this last fact is all we need to remember from AEG’s pile of lies – when Michael was tested in February 2009 he was absolutely clean of any substances, same as he was found clean of Demerol when he died.

In February there was none and in June 2009 there was none either, and this is all we need to know about Michael. Within this half a year his blood was tested twice and both times it showed no traces of drugs, and all talk from AEG’s experts about what they “think” is simple nastiness.

2. AEG’S EMAILS

Okay, so on February 4, 2009 Dr. Slavit did his physical for the insurance and what comes next? And next comes a series of AEG emails about obtaining this very insurance which set the scene for the tragic events that happened.

The first chain of emails is dated March 17-22, 2009. Two thirds of this correspondence is redacted but from the rest we gather that on March 22 the insurance was still not there. This was the time immediately after announcing the 50 shows and selling out almost one million tickets. And though all the time prior to that Randy Phillips kept saying they had the insurance for 10 shows, when it came to 50 dates AEG hit rough waters, and from the March emails you get the impression that they had to start afresh because the terms, sum and even type of the insurance were still undecided.

The insurance broker John Silcock working with Bob Taylor wrote on March 17, 2009 that they had some offers for $11,5mln requested by Timm Woolley as the sum of the insurance:

From: John Silcock

Sent: 17 March 2009

To: Paul Gongaware

CC: Timm Woolley, Shawn Trell, Bob Taylor, Deniz Dervizh

Subject: Tour Insurance

We have some terms from insurers which potentially look interesting, but we need to clarify a couple of points. We will aim to get back to you tomorrow. This will be on basis of covering the $11,5m per Timm’s email yesterday.

Why was the matter still not decided though previously Randy Phillips announced to the whole world that the insurance was in their pocket? Because not only the show grew in size but AEG also increased the number of dates, thus increasing the cost of the tour, and all this required a bigger insurance.

This way  even from the sum of the insurance requested we find that on March 17 the estimated budget of the show was supposed to be around $11,5mln – we know it simply because the insurance was meant to be equal to the sum of the budget and was to cover it.

The email of March 20 2009 is stating the terms of one of the proposed variants to insure 30 shows. Yes, the maximum number of the shows mentioned is only 30, which makes us think that there were problems with arranging the insurance for 50 shows. I suspect that the first thing the insurers would require for that was a written confirmation that the artist agreed to those 50 shows, however this is exactly what AEG was missing as they had to admit during the trial.

The insurance was offered on condition of cancellation only, but not rescheduling – so if some shows were cancelled the insurers would pay, but if the show were rescheduled they would not, and this could have serious implications for Michael. Rescheduling involved additional expenses and this was not to be tolerated by AEG and this could well be the reason why once AEG set the dates they looked at them as  carved in stone with no remonstrations from the Artist accepted.

And the Artist did remonstrate because out of 50 shows 34 were set with only one day between the shows!

Out of 50 shows 34 were set with only one day between the shows!

Out of 50 shows 34 were set with only one day between the shows

On March 20 the sum of the insurance requested by AEG was already $14,5mln, and this points to the budget increasing too.

In his email the broker said that the insurance policy for MJ was a complicated matter and this was almost entirely due to the negative portrayal of Michael by the press. So tabloids and the media can congratulate themselves that they put a hand to Michael’s final tragedy too – it was due to their lies and irresponsible gossip that AEG could not obtain that damned insurance.

March 20, 2009

John Silcock is writing to Paul Gongaware and is copying to the same crowd of Timm Woolley, Shawn Trell, Bob Taylor, Deniz Dervizh:

Sorry for the delay, have just got to NY.

We’ve got some indicative terms, but there will be more information required before we are able to firm these up. This will however give you some idea of likely costs, subject to the additional information. We are also working on some other options, such as Death/Disability only, but I will come on to these later.

As I am sure you will appreciate, this is a far from straightforward and somewhat more complicated placement, almost entirely due to how this particular artist is portrayed in the media. Consequently there are a lot of pre-conceived ideas about him, some of which have been very difficult to overcome, simply due to the overwhelming amount of negative publicity, despite the good medical report.

To insure 30 shows with a sum insured of $14,5M (per Timm’s email) on the basis of insuring only those shows cancelled and not rescheduled. Subject to a 3 show deductible (shows lost). There will be no cover for the costs to reschedule any shows.

NOTE: The offer was for the Premium Non-appearance package which was eventually rejected by AEG:

Premium: $797,500 (Rate: 5,5%)

As I have said, this is an indication only and is subject to more detailed information – for example:

  1. Due to the specific nature of this risk, insurers will require a further medical examination to be carried out by their nominated doctor. This will be very similar to the previous examination. They may restrict illness cover or death from illness cover until this examination has taken place.
  2. Full review of past 5 year medical history by nominated doctor.
  3. No catastrophe non-appearance coverage of bands, dancers or backing singers will be granted until all names and ages of performers seen and agreed by underwriters.
  4. Full details of the stage to be provided. No cover for losses arising from the staging will be covered until information seen and accepted by underwriters.
  5. Full details of weekly fitness programme.
  6. Full details of any pre-existing conditions or illnesses suffered by the children along with a signed release granting access to their full medical records in the events of a related loss hereunder.
  7. Journey details (time allowed for travel + number of vehicles, etc.) to the venue to be advised to underwriters.
  8. Full details of any promotional work that will be undertaken during the policy period.
  9. Limit of Indemnity of $14,5M (or final figure) is amortised over the 30 shows.
  10. A full budget showing anticipated revenues and costs.
  11. How many songs will be performed (is there a contractual minimum or maximum)? The show not to be longer than 90 minutes (we may be able to negotiate on this, but will need to know how long the show will be including any encores).

Though this offer was rejected by AEG I am still mentioning it here because in contained one condition which could very well be specified in the cheaper insurance policy for Accident and Sickness which AEG settled on, and this condition is that the show was not to be more than 90 minutes (1 hour and 30 minutes) and not 2 hours or more as it eventually grew into. From further correspondence we will learn that out of that hour and a half the 50-year old Jackson was supposed to be on stage on the insurers’ insistence for no more than one hour and 20 minutes.

From the discussion of that Premium Non-appearance insurance we also get that the insurers required additional information about all proposed shows until the end of 2010 (so there were to be shows until the end of 2010 though AEG now disputes it) and confirmation of the date when a new insurance was to be purchased for the already set shows until February 2010.

So AEG did promise to the insurers to obtain from them a new policy for 20 more shows in addition to the first 30, and we can only guess why they did not cover all 50 shows in one insurance policy. They did not want to? Or most probably could not as they had no written confirmation from MJ for the 50 of them?

Another reason why I am mentioning the Non-appearance policy (eventually not chosen by AEG) is because while discussing it the insurers asked AEG whether a medical practitioner would accompany Michael Jackson on the tour – so having a doctor by Michael’s side could very well be even their requirement. The insurers actually didn’t even doubt that there would be a doctor and it was simply details of the medical arrangement that they were asking for.

The email started above continues with the additional information the insurers might need:

Additional information which will be required prior to binding:

  1. Comprehensive list of ALL proposed shows not already announced up to the end of 2010.
  2. Confirmation of when cover will be purchased for the 2010 shows (up to February) and on estimation of the level of cover that will be required.
  3. Details of any coverage that artistco will require on the 30 shows to be covered hereunder.
  4. Will the artist have a medical practitioner travelling with the tour party or will one be retained in London? If so, (either scenario) please provide their names.
  5. Confirmation from the mother’s doctor as to her current state of health and any medical conditions from which suffers (or has suffered).
  6. Details of the mother’s living arrangements, e.g. private residence, care home, and is there any retained dedicated care staff?

The point about Michael’s mother is an indication that care for her was so important for Michael that potentially it could be a reason for cancellation of the shows (tour), so the insurers wanted to assess that risk as well.

Insurance March 20 - 2nd email from Silcock, various types of insurance

March 20, 2009. The insurance is far from ready – they are still looking into various types of it (click to enlarge)

The same day March 20, 2009 another email from John Silcock was sent to AEG which explained different variants of the insurances available. Out of all the variants AEG (possibly in cooperation with MJ or Tohme) eventually selected the one covering Accident and Sickness. The sum or premium to be paid was $435,000 plus taxes:

March 20, 2009

Just to let you know that I’ve now got some indications of cost for Death/Disability.

To provide cover for Death (any cause) and Permanent Total Disablement due to Accident or Sickness for a limit of $14,5mln the premium would be $435,000.

To provide cover for Accidental Death and Permanent Total Disablement due to Accident only (in other words excluding sickness or disease or natural causes) the premium would be $145,000.

Both quotations will exclude suicide or intentional self-injury.

…The cover/indicated cost options all based on 30 shows and a limit of $14,5 mln are therefore

Non-Appearance

3 shows deductible

$797,500

Cancellation/Failure to Recoup

No deductible

$362,500

Death /Disability (Accident and Sickness)

No deductible

$435,000

Death/Disability (Accident only)

No deductible

$145,000

The most comprehensive coverage is the Non-Appearance. The Failure to Recoup is more competitive and will provide cover in the event you fail to recoup of course, BUT in this context recoupment means out of net revenue from day one, not amortization over the course of the 30 shows. Both are subject to more information.

Given the very good medical, the Accidental Death/Disability is a good option, and is by far and away the most competitive/ However, this is only basic cover and would not included coverage for situations such as damage/unavailability of the venue, life threatening illness of family members, etc. The Death /Disability cover is not subject to the same requirement regarding further information.

It may even be worth considering a combination of the Failure to Recoup and the Accidental Death/Disability, as the latter can continue to provide some protection after recoupment.

We would strongly recommend that the Terrorism cover is purchased as a stand alone policy irrespective as to which of the other options you decide upon.

Look forward to hearing from you once you’ve had an opportunity to review, and if you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact us.

Let us note the whole idea of the insurance is revolving around the idea of recoupment of the costs of the show and this was why AEG was so terribly keen on it.

The above offer was followed by several emails which are fully redacted now revealing only one email sent by Timm Wolley on March 22, 2009. What’s good about it is that it explained the breakdown of expenses for the first 30 and second 20 shows. And while the email chain started with a request for $11,5mln now Shawn Trell is talking about $17,5 mln.

You remember that in his testimony Shawn Trell said that they chose Lloyds as they were the only one who would agree to provide $17,5 mln (for an “unreliable” guy like MJ), however even these emails show that AEG were getting to this sum gradually, depending on the anticipated costs. Within some 5 days or so their anticipation of the expenses rose from $11,5 mln to $17,5 mln, so the latter sum must have been the one they were putting into their budget around March 22, 2009.

Timm Woolley’s email of March 22 is addressed to the same crowd – the insurance brokers John Silcock, Bob Taylor and Deniz Dervish with copies to Paul Gongaware and Shawn Trell.

In this email Timm Woolley explains very interesting things we won’t be able to find anywhere else – for example, the fact that they wanted to get as much as $400,000 per show from agencies like Viagogo for secondary tickets alone. For 50 shows that would make extra $20mln on top of the regular tickets sold:

I haven’t walked through this with PaulG yet, but am expecting to later today. There will be individual line-item changes in expenses, probably, but income won’t change as they have been previously discussed with PaulG by Gorg Berg.

Format: There are two sections to the budget: first 30 shows, second tranche of 20 shows. Within the former there’s the pre-tour and rehearsal section and then the 30-show run. Within the latter, there’s the break cost (three months at 25% – policy as yet unresolved, but ballpark) and then the run of 20 shows. Please ignore all sheets except “Production”.

Insurance March 22 Timm Wolley explanation of all expenses part 1

Insurance March 22 Timm Wolley explanation of all expenses part 2a

March 22, 2009. AEG: “Secondary ticketing (premium sales through ViaGoGo, for example) are expected to contribute $200,000 per show. Note: this might improve to $400,000 per show.”

Income: Ticket sales are estimated as sell-out at a pre-stage-design cap of 14992, but sighlines are expected to improve to allow another 500 tickets to go on sale when the stage and stage-design is complete. The ticket income is shown as being subject to 15% VAT and the combined expenses of the 50 shows is reflected in ‘Show%’ on line 99 – i.e. approx. 15% is comprised of local expenses including AEG rent, stagehands, catering, support, pl insurance, etc.  Merchandising is not expected to contribute more than approx $2,6m over the entire run.

But secondary ticketing (premium sales through ViaGoGo, for example) plus boat-ferry packages plus VIP packages, plus outlet commissions are expected to contribute $200,000 per show. Note: this might improve to $400,000 per show. Exchange rates were taken as GBP1=$1,4 but the recent Fed actions have already caused the GBP to increase to $1.46 and the trend is likely to increase to between $1.5 and $1.6 by summer.

NOTE: Since the tickets were sold in pounds and given the above trends in the exchange rate the overall sums in dollars were to  eventually grow.

Expense: 7 weeks of casting/choreographing and arranging/rehearsals will take place for dancers and vocalists/musicians respectively. The production may then go into Sony Studios rehearsal space of (less likely) LA Forum for 3.5 weeks of sound, lights, video, staging, fx rehearsals. After airfreight to UK, there will be approx 1 week of full UK rehearsals in EC or Wembley, former being preferable, prior to the first O2 show.

Please note that there are columns that have been ‘hidden’ that include cash flow analyses I didn’t get to yesterday and a division between costs arising in GBP –v –US$ to inform internal decisions on remitting cash to AEG corporate. This doesn’t affect what you are looking for.

NOTE: 7 weeks of casting/choreographing finally explained to me the difference in the dates reported by AEG and other sources – AEG said the casting was done in April while the media reported it as May 2009, and both were right as the casting was followed by a period of choreography when the dancers didn’t join Michael and there were no general rehearsal.

Central to this exercise:

  1. Pre-production and rehearsal expenses are now expected to be $10,5m, so the sum insured goes up to $17,5m. These costs will be recouped in the 30 show run, together with the artist advance and the pre-tour layout in rent and production supervision’.
  2. Break costs, representing upfront expenses prior to the second tranche of 20 shows will probably not represent an additional, later line-item to insure.
  3. Pre-tour costs and advances are recouped on a straight-line amortised 30-show basis with the artist, with staged-settlements taking place each few shows and a further payment being made to artist taking into account also the current costs of the shows taking place in the time period. If, due to a postponement, costs were incurred without concomitant revenue, the next staged-settlement would take these into account and the artist payment resulting would be reduced by those expenses.

Please call for explanations.

Timm

After reading this email the idea of who was to pay for what, including pre-tour production costs which were later placed on Michael,  and how those expenses were to be recouped and what the insurance has to do with it was finally beginning to acquire some clarity.

3. WHAT ANIMAL IS “TOUR EXPENSE”?

The general idea of the deal as I see it now was that AEG was indeed to invest some money in the show and insure those expenses to be able to get them back in case of cancellations. As the tour began each show was to recoup them a certain portion of the costs spent and by the end of 30 shows all those expenses were to be recouped.

The costs spent were to be covered by the insurance. If everything went well the insurance sum was not to be paid out as the money made by the tour was to recoup all that, but if a cancellation occurred the insurance was meant to cover the losses. Each successful show made the insurance sum smaller and this process was called “amortization”.

The 30 shows were to bring back to AEG not only the pre-production expenses for $17,5mln but also the artist advance of $5mln as well as payment for the rent of houses for the whole company same as some mysterious expenses called by AEG ‘production supervision’ and put by AEG in quotes for some reason.

Let us make a mental note of this mysterious ‘production supervision’ before we proceed.

Another mysterious phrase appearing in those emails is ‘tour expenses’ and one of the emails that followed finally explained that tour expenses and AEG expenses are one and the same thing. There is an equal mark between the two and this means that the tour expenses including all those production costs were to be borne by AEG – just as I always thought. Moreover they were clearly differentiated from Michael Jackson’s expenses by AEG themselves.

And in this respect the email dated June 18th from Timm Woolley is absolutely invaluable. The email is about only one detail in AEG/MJ cooperation - a split of housing, security and transportation costs in London between the parties, but it explains to us the general pattern of splitting expenses between Michael Jackson and AEG, and this email explicitly says that everything that is Tour expense is actually AEG’s responsibility.

And this has a direct bearing upon Conrad Murray and in whose employment he was.

4. CONRAD MURRAY WAS THEIR “TOUR” EXPENSE

Read this email carefully, please, paying attention to the encircled words – they are all related to each other:

Split of expenses between AEG and MJ. Conrad Murray's house is "Tour" expense which is equal to AEG's expense

The split of expenses between AEG and MJ. Conrad Murray’s house is “Tour” expense which is equal to AEG’s expense

The email says that the housing of Michael Bush (wardrobe), Karen Faye (make up artist) and – attention please -  Conrad Murray (personal physician)  was to be paid for by AEG, while Michael was to pay only for the furniture in his own house in London, food supplies, etc.

The expenses on those three people’s housing were “Tour expenses” and were to be recouped from the money made by the show, or were to be alternately compensated for by the insurance in case of cancellation of the tour.

It is absolutely sensational that the expenses on Conrad Murray’s house are clearly stated in this email as Tour expenses which are the expenses covered by AEG – in fact there is a clear equal mark put between the two! And this is explained to us by no other than AEG themselves!

Other things listed among the “tour” costs (another name for it is “show” costs) were security and transportation, and even a special remark is made about these expenses that they “continue” to be show costs.

Continue to be show costs? But if the arrangement about transportation continues to be the same in London as it was in the US doesn’t it mean that all other transportation expenses, shifted to Michael  after his death, were also the show costs, were AEG’s and absolutely not Michael’s?

It seems that it does, because the same email even makes a differentiation between the tour transportation expenses and the expenses on the local transport for which Michael was to pay personally as it was meant for his family.

This MJ’s spending on the local transport was to be charged back to Michael while all other costs were not, and this means that the transportation to the place of their work for him and the company (for example, Karen Faye, Michael Bush and Conrad Murray) was none of MJ’s business either and was the tour cost again, and this in addition to the housing for all the three for which payment was to be made by AEG too.

What’s also extremely good about this June 18th email from Timm Woolley is that the split of expenses was fully approved by Paul Gongaware, so the information that the Tour expenses and expenses on Murray’s house were solely AEG’s responsibility comes straight from the horse’s mouth:

June 18, 2009

From Timm Woolley:

To: ALL

I have prepared what I think is an equitable division of expense between MJ and the Tour.

AEG:

Pays for entertainment arcade & bowling alley because they were a precondition in terms of facilities he needed at the house and part of the bargain.

Pays for 3 of the local houses –Bush, Faye and Murray (wardrobe dresser, make-up/hair & personal physician).

MJ:

Pays for the additional furniture because we are providing a fully-furnished house. MJ’s stylistic additions are added at his discretion.

Pays for 5/8 of the staffing housing: security, nanny, miko. And the initial food stocking. Food & and supplies will continue to be an MJ expense and the security people have credit cards of their own for that, but we’ll eventually credit the MJ account with a notional per diem allowance.

Costs of security detail and transport continue to be show costs. Former because we’d have had to secure any London hotel he would stay at. The latter only to the extent that the family local transport is a chargeback to MJ.

If anyone has other thoughts to offer, I hope we can agree that this is fair. If there is agreement, then PG to give approval.

Timm

And what a marvel Paul Gongaware is for approving the above split on June 19th!

From: Paul Gongaware

Sent: 19 June 2009

To: Timm Woolley

Cc: Brigitte Segal, Rick Webking, Julie Hollander, Colin Chapple, Luke Flynn

Subject: Re: estimated costs for MJ in London

I agree with Timm’s allocation and the charges. Approved.

PaulG

Now we know for sure that at least the house in London for Conrad Murray was included into the Tour cost and was NOT to be charged back to Michael Jackson as it was not considered to be his responsibility. Further emails will show that the salary of Conrad Murray was also included into AEG’s budget, but since the subject is big I will leave it until the next post.

What I need to say now is that this kind of an arrangement would have been perfectly fair had it been realized that way – however after Michael’s death AEG presented the case in exactly the opposite variant.

5. HYSTERIA, FRAUD AND GREED

Now they say that all the money spent on Conrad Murray (including his house in London) was Michael’s responsibility, same as all transportation, production and other costs, though in reality all of it was the so-called “Tour cost” which was to be recouped from the money made by the show and covered by the insurance.

This Tour cost was not exactly Michael’s responsibility because on the one hand it was to be deducted from the money he earned for the show but on the other hand he was not directly to pay it, especially if the tour was cancelled (the cancellation was to be covered by the insurance).

Similarly it was not exactly AEG’s responsibility as their expense was temporary and was to be recouped by them either from the money made by the tour or from the insurance. It was the investment made and recouped, and the recoupment was meant to be safeguarded by the insurance.

And this is where the problem arose. While the expenses were rising the insurance was not obtained  - through no fault of MJ’s, but actually AEG’s as it was them who increased the number of the shows.

The absence of the insurance sent AEG into a total hysteria, after which they started setting Michael ultimatums about the high cost of the tour and arranging him riot meetings, most probably accusing him of faking illness and indulging himself in drugs in order to escape the shows and thus leave AEG with no insurance and no recouped costs.

They were safeguarded against any losses by Michael’s assets anyway, but over here they were probably not sure how much he “cost”, so the hysteria continued.

They were indeed in the danger of not getting that damned insurance of $17,5mln if they had made Michael’s condition public, but it was still absolutely no reason for denying him help. If they had helped him then he would have repaid them in full measure – he would have done those concerts for sure as he was the first person interested in doing them and they would have recouped all their expenses even without any insurance.

In fact even in the unlikely case they had not recouped their expenses, for someone with billions in his pocket this wouldn’t have been a catastrophe either. They would have sold the concert footage and whatnot and would have gone into history as the last “saviors” of MJ crowning themselves with fame forever after …

However losing money for a flimsy thing like good repute and people’s gratitude was never AEG’s choice. In fact even after Michael’s death they chose only money again. They used his death to their great advantage all around and to this end engaged themselves in an outright fraud – the Tour costs were turned into solely Michael’s responsibility through those fake statements from Tohme and Dileo, and were submitted for payment to Michael’s Estate.

By shifting Tour expenses onto Michael they were killing two birds with one stone – they recouped all their money as the costs were compensated for by Michael’s estate (initially AEG tried to include even Murray into those sums too) and they declared themselves not responsible for Murray and his actions, as according to their new strategy Murray was no longer the Tour expense and was solely Michael’s business.

In addition to doing all that and full recoupment of the expenses from Michael’s estate they sold the rehearsal footage for $65mln to Sony (the additional $5mln were charged for making the film) and partook of the profit the film made worldwide which brought them totally astronomical sums.

They also retained part of the $85 mln for the ordinary tickets sold for This Is It because at least 40% of fans decided to keep those tickets as memorabilia, and only God knows how much they retained as a result of not recompensing secondary tickets sold at thousands of dollars.

And in addition to all that they also wanted to get the insurance money, and fought for those $17,5 mln tooth and nail for several years until the insurers found out that AEG had actually not suffered any losses, recouped all their money from the Estate and therefore didn’t even have a reason for claiming the insurance.

Now AEG is terribly busy again – they are pouring tons of dirt on the man who earned him all that money. Indeed, greed is the root of all evil.

* * *

The next part of this post will continue with AEG’s emails which will hopefully explain the situation with Murray further and occasionally make a totally fantastic read.

For example, one of the emails will explain the meaning of the mysterious “production supervision”. It was also part of the Tour cost to be recouped from the money made by the tour and to be covered by the insurance and it means the services of Tohme Tohme….


Filed under: AEG THE HORRIBLE, Jacksons vs. AEG Tagged: AEG, insurance, Michael Jackson, Slavit

Jacksons – AEG trial. KATHY JORRIE, Dr. GARY GREEN and IVY of MJJCommunity all in one pack

$
0
0

THEY THRIVE WHILE HE IS DEAD

It’s Michael’s birthday today and while all these AEG people are going about their day-to-day activities it is especially today that you feel that he is gone. All of them are going on with their lives and it is only Michael who is no longer here and will never return. He will never see his children, will never see them grow up, will never share their joys and their worries and he will never go on a vacation with his grandkids.

This “going on vacation with grandkids” point was mentioned in Kathy Jorrie’s testimony and was used as a reason why her cross-examination had to be short – she had to catch a plane to go on vacation with the grandkids so everyone in court went out of their way to adjust to her plans.

When this remarkable lady was making her remarkable contract for Michael Jackson which lied to him in each of its sentences, no one was trying to adjust it to Michael Jackson. And when they were setting 50 concerts for every other day with only one day break between the concerts no one was thinking of his interests and that he needed time to recuperate between the shows.

It is only Kathy Jorrie who doesn’t have time for this court and should leave at noon because five hours later she has a plane to take her on vacation, and the court system should please hurry up and cut on her questioning. And it is only when it came to Michael Jackson that no one looked into his needs – over there “it was solely business” and he was to be run as a machine.

However Michael was a human being and (surprise-surprise) he needed time for rest too, and he also had kids and he also wanted to go on vacation with them one day.

But Michael Jackson had a special treatment. Michael Jackson could be set harsh terms, could be put into impossible conditions, could be slapped, humiliated and put into a ‘straight jacket’, and what’s surprising about it all is that everyone thinks that it is perfectly okay - but when it comes to Kathy Jorrie, a bosom friend-lawyer of AEG of 14 years and her precious plans to go on vacation, everyone is expected to understand and the whole court system should please stop and adjust to this woman’s plans.

Really, these double standards and outlandish hypocrisy is something that makes me complete mad about this AEG business. We are supposed to understand everyone – Kathy Jorrie, AEG, Ortega, irresponsible doctors who ruined MJ’s hard work to end his dependency on  medications back in 1993,  Conrad Murray with all his problems, etc.  – and it is only Michael Jackson who is never to be understood or listened to, who is to be handled with tough love and is obligated to each and everyone on this planet.

He was to do this, he was to do that … isn’t it time for everyone to do a reality check and realize that he wasn’t obligated to any of us at all?

He wasn’t obliged to give explanations about his lifestyle, about his skin, about his dermatological issues, about why he kept giraffes in Neverland, about his wives and his sex life, and about why he didn’t want to do rehearsals, and why he didn’t sing in full voice and why he walked on the stage and not danced.

He didn’t owe any explanations to anyone at all, and it was AEG that should have please adjusted to him in the same way the US court is now adjusting to the plans of one woman who is going on vacation with her grandkids.

But the unobtrusive and humble Michael Jackson is now dead, while these arrogant and self-centered people are going on vacations and are utterly enjoying themselves. This is what makes Michael’s death so unbearable – all these people are going on with their lives not feeling even a morsel of guilt for what they did, but they nevertheless think they deserve a life full of comfort, happiness and delight. In fact these nice people are so ‘nice’ that none of them ever said a word of compassion to Michael’s mother and his kids.

I suspect that if AEG bosses had gone to Michael’s mother and cried on her shoulder frankly explaining how all this nightmare was evolving and what mistakes they made, and how terribly sorry they are, she would have forgiven them,  because she is gentle and is like Michael and really believes in God and does what He tells her to do. But seeking forgiveness from Michael’s mother was never an option for AEG and instead they chose to dance a rite of hate on Michael’s bones which is what they are doing now at this trial.

It isn’t enough for them that they humiliated him beyond measure while he was alive. No, they want to humiliate him even more when he is dead – and this doesn’t prevent them from being perfectly satisfied with their precious selves. And a lot of their helpers are smugly observing the process of mudding MJ further and are even throwing in some of their own mud hoping that we wish we had never got into this.

No, these people do not deserve compassion. They never regretted what they did, they never sought forgiveness, they never wanted to make it up for Michael’s mother and children at least in some way, they never showed compassion for her and the kids (and for Michael when was alive), and this terrible lack of self-reflection and total absence of guilt is probably the worst of what we see in this AEG pack. Letting these people get away with what they did to Michael will be our heavy guilt towards Michael Jackson.

KATHY JORRIE AS ONE OF THEM

kathy-jorrieI read Kathy Jorrie’s testimony quite by chance as I really didn’t want to. She drafted a totally dreadful contract with Michael which is structured in such a way that it can be turned any way you want and each time it will be for the benefit of AEG only, so listening to more of her meanness was really too much.

But it just happened that her testimony was suddenly brought to my attention and the circumstances under which it happened were rather interesting too.

Since going on vacation with her grandkids is the most important aspect of Jorrie’s testimony over which everyone in that courtroom was fussing, let us start with the sweet, old-fashioned and sentimental picture of civility and kindness displayed towards Kathy Jorrie and her grandkids.

The additional benefit of the show is a surprise that so young a woman already has grandkids – be like them and you won’t be tired and penniless, but will be healthy, young and enjoy vacations with your grandkids. The scene is a model of care and concern about another human being:

Q. I understand that you are not available to testify for most of this afternoon, is that right?

A. Yes.

Q. And is that because you have a family vacation with your grandchildren?

A. Yes.

Q. I do not want to keep you from that, so I’m going to go as quickly as possible as I can this morning.

A. Thank you.

Ms. Bina. I’m happy to move on, your honor, in the interest of saving time and letting this witness go on vacation with her grandchildren.

Mr. Panish. She’s not going on vacation. Your honor, she’s not going on vacation.

Judge. Mr. Panish, you’re interrupting. Remember everybody gets a chance? It’s Ms. Bina’s chance.

Mr. Panish. Well, I don’t want to have to come back because now they’re running out my time. They said

she’s going on vacation. She’s going to the airport at 5:00 o’clock, she has to pick up her grandkids, she said. Okay? At 5:00 o’clock. So now the implication is now we’re going to be at 11:00 something, my cross- examination is going to be interrupted.

Judge. How much longer do you have, Ms. Bina?

Ms. Bina. I have about four pages left, your honor. I’m going as fast as I can. Mr. Panish is objecting a lot.

Mr. Panish. Because you’re asking improper questions.

Ms. Bina. Anyway, your honor, I’m trying to move things on. If he would make shorter objections, it might

go faster. But the point is I’m nearly done.

What a nauseous civility at the expense of courtroom time for Brian Panish! And it gets especially nauseous when you recall how this very Kathy Jorrie treated Michael Jackson in that dreadful contract of hers – she was not giving him a single chance up to a degree which is simply unacceptable between civil people.

For example if Michael was not giving his approval to something and his disagreement was ‘unreasonable’ (it was AEG who was to decide that) Michael’s disapproval was actually considered to be his approval, or in other words his opinion did not matter irrespective of what he said.

If he approved it was okay, but if he disapproved it was okay too, because it simply did not matter – AEG would still do as they pleased. With such a contract what’s the use of discussing AEG’s cooperation with MJ at all? Whichever way you look at it it will never be in favor of Michael Jackson!

What she is saying here is very typical of the terms she set for MJ in AEG’s contract:

Q. Now let’s go on to paragraph 11, which is approvals. Ms. Jorrie, can you give me a brief understanding in laymen’s terms of what this provision is about?

A. The provision, in laymen’s terms, provides that no party can refuse to give its approval unreasonably; and then the next sentence says if a party is unreasonable, if they — they won’t give an approval that they reasonably should have given, the approval will be deemed to have been given.

Q. In the event the Michael Jackson Company unreasonably withholds delays or qualifies its approval over any such matter, the Michael Jackson company shall be deemed to have given its approval over such matter?

A. Yes.

Who was to decide whether the refusal was reasonable or not? AEG of course, who else?

Kathy Jorrie thinks they did not require Michael’s approval for 50 shows either. Her explanation is that AEG increased the number of shows because AEG needed to recoup the tour expenses:

 Q. I’m speaking just of the idea of approving additional shows. For instance, the idea of going from 31 to 50 shows, or additional shows in a given leg of the tour.

A. Okay. Let’s start with that one. At this particular contract, if — if you go to where it says it shall be unreasonable for Artistco to withhold its approval for adding shows to any given leg of the tour — or adding legs of shows to the tour during the term so long as the number of shows in any given leg do not exceed one per day and 3.5 per seven-day period on average. That’s what Mr. Panish read. What he didn’t read is the part after that, it’s limited where it says if promoter demonstrates to Artistco that such additional shows and/or legs are necessary for promoter to recoup the advances in accordance with the terms of this agreement.

Q. And then the part that he didn’t read out loud is a qualification on that that says if the promoter demonstrates to the Michael Jackson company that such additional shows and/or legs are necessary for promoter to recoup the advances that they’ve given to Mr. Jackson and his company within the terms of the agreement, right?

A. Right.

I wonder if Kathy Jorrie herself would agree to perform the number of shows “not exceeding one per day and 3,5 per seven-day period on average”, but besides that I have another question. At the beginning of March 2009 the rehearsals did not even start and there was nothing to recoup yet, but they still increased the number of shows to 50 dates. The question is WHY? The arguments of this lawyer who says that she is an independent witness do not even apply here! And after that she is claiming  that her “client relationship with AEG  is not affecting her testimony”? Look at all this hypocrisy:

Q. Does it affect your testimony — your truthful testimony here in court that you have a client relationship with AEG Live?

A. It does not.

Q. Why not?

A. Because I’m a member of the bar, and we have certain ethical obligations as officers of the court. I was raised to have integrity and to be honest, and so I’m doing the best I can to remember everything and to be as truthful as possible.

Kathy Jorrie 2

Kathy Jorrie testifies at Conrad Murray’s trial

In fact the way these “members of the bar” are twisting the truth depending on which way is more convenient to them is totally amazing. On the one hand she says she has never seen AEG’s budget and since she has never seen it Brian Panish is not allowed to question her about it, but on the other hand we find that she actually took part in making a certain agreement when presenting this very budget to the Estate, and therefore she knows it inside out!

Q. And do you — were you involved in another agreement where AEG Live was ultimately reimbursed by the estate of Michael Jackson for approximately 36 million in production costs and related expenses?

Mr. Panish. Number 1, it’s irrelevant as to whether or not Mr. Tohme was an officer of the company. Number 2, this would then get into attorney/client privilege. They can’t just ask that and prohibit me from questioning her all about that…

After looking at all these twists and turns we more or less know what to expect of Conrad Murray’s contract which was also drafted by Kathy Jorrie.

WHY DID THEY STALL CONRAD MURRAY? 

Kathy Jorrie says that Timm Woolley informed her of the need to draft an AEG contract with Conrad Murray in May 2009, but she made her first draft only on June 16, 2009, so for a month and a half since Murray started working nothing happened.

In May 2009 AEG was stalling Murray and Timm Woolley or someone else at AEG even wrote an email encouraging to distract him by something else in order to stall him as the contract was not ready. “Stalling” means avoiding a clear answer to a question in order to get more time.

So though Murray’s services began on May 1 the “stalling” process lasted until June 15, when AEG suddenly remembered him. Now Jorrie says that she heard about the need to do Murray’s contract only in June, however at Murray’s trial she said that it was May, so they did stall him for a month and a half  - only Kathy Jorrie does not want to admit it. This is her testimony at Murray’s trial:

Q. When was it you were first provided any information about the necessity of there being a contract?

A. It — to my best recollection, it was in May. It was at the latter part of May Mr. Woolley let me know about the need to have this contract prepared.

At AEG’s trial she admitted that full 6 weeks passed until the first draft was finally presented to Murray:

Q. so May 1st, and the date that you sent that to Mr. Woolley to forward to Dr. Murray was what date?

A. The date I sent it was June 15.

Q. And that, then, would be six weeks after May 1st, the date that you put in the first draft for the contract to commence, correct?

A. Yes.

The timing of the first draft perfectly coincides with the so-called “Intervention meeting” arranged on June 16 by Randy Phillips and Paul Gongaware on the insistence of Kenny Ortega. The intervention meeting stemmed from Murray having the cheek to give Michael a sick leave on June 12 (Saturday). On Sunday Phillips was already calling Murray, and Gongaware was writing emails about the need to remind him who was paying Murray’s salary. On Monday – Tuesday the frightened and ill Michael was rehearsing, and on June 16 came the “intervention”.

The “intervention” actually had a very positive effect on Conrad Murray –  after a long period of ignoring Murray AEG finally noticed him, ‘brought him into the fold’ and Kathy Jorrie even presented him with the first draft of their contract. Murray received it on June 15 and the very next day this carrot worked –  there would be no more sick leaves for Michael Jackson and Murray would take care of MJ’s attndance of rehearsals. In short now that the contract became a reality Murray was on his best behavior with the AEG bosses.

It is interesting that out of the three drafts (June 15, 18 and 23) none were sent to Michael Jackson or his representatives though the last draft was made on June 23 when Branca was already in the picture and wanted to see all the documents MJ was supposed to sign. So if MJ was indeed to sign Murray’s contract Kathy Jorrie should have sent it to Branca before giving it to Murray for singing, but she naturally didn’t:

Q. Okay. In fact, but you never communicated with Mr. Jackson, correct?

A. Correct.

Q. Okay. You never communicated with Mr. Hawk regarding the Conrad Murray agreement, correct?

A. That’s right.

Q. You never communicated with Dr. — or Mr. Tohme about the Conrad Murray agreement, correct?

A. Correct.

Q. You never communicated with John Branca about the agreement, correct?

A. Correct.

Q. Never communicated with Mr. Katz about the agreement, correct?

A. Correct.

Q. You never communicated with Dr. Lopez at all — excuse me — Mr. Peter Lopez about the agreement, correct?

A. Right.

Q. Did you communicate with anyone that you understood was a representative of Michael Jackson regarding that Dr. Murray contract that you were drafting?

A. No.

Q. So would it be fair to say that you didn’t send any of the drafts or the last version of the contract to any representative of Michael Jackson?

A. That’s fair to say.

Kathy Jorrie explained it by the fact that she wanted to send it to MJ’s side after they agreed about everything between themselves and then MJ’s representatives would be free to make their comments:

Q. Why didn’t you check with Mr. Jackson or his representatives before making this change?

A. Because we were negotiating the contract to a point where when it was to a place where Dr. Murray was happy with the terms, it would be presented to Michael Jackson for review and his representatives for review and comment. And if he had comments, he would be free to provide comments and changes if he wanted to.

But this is a lie because the last version was not a draft but was the final variant, and Murray was signing the final agreement and not some preliminary paper. This final copy stated the date of execution of the contract as June 24, so there was even no time for any corrections on Michael’s side. They were actually never meant to be made at all and this is why Conrad Murray signed it:

Q. And then the third and final one that Dr. Murray signed, you saved as “final –” wait a minute. “final Michael Jackson AEG GCA Holdings agreement Dr. Murray 6/23/09.pdf,” correct?

A. Yes.

Q. And that’s the one that Dr. Murray signed?

A. Correct.

Q. And faxed back to you?

A. Yes.

Q. And you provided that to Mr. Trell?

A. Yes, I did.

On June 18 Kathy Jorrie looked up Murray on the Internet (for 10 minutes as she said) after or before talking to Murray on the phone. It won’t surprise us to learn that the subject of the discussion was insurance.

WHY DID THEY FINALLY NOTICE MURRAY?

Kathy Jorrie requested Murray to help them obtain MJ’s medical records for 5 years prior to 2009 and this makes us suspect that AEG themselves were terribly interested in getting Murray as MJ’s doctor – they thought that he had Michael’s medical records for at least 3 years.  At least he claimed that he had been MJ’s doctor for 3 years before that.

And this is probably why Dr.Murray was preferred by AEG bosses over Dr. Finkelstein or anyone else – Murray was the only doctor who said (most probably wrongly) that he had been in contact with Michael for 3 years after Bahrain. This was not 5 years as was requested by the insurers, but over the number of years they could negotiate as everyone understood that getting medical records from the Prince of Bahrain could be quite a problem.

The comments from AEG’s lawyers at a sidebar were extremely helpful to realize that all activity around Murray’s contract started in mid-June when AEG began to worry that Michael would not last long but the insurance was still not there. The lawyers talked about it for so long that the meaning of all those hints finally dawned on me – they started working on Murray’s contract only when they realized that he could be helpful to them in two directions – as a guarantee of Michael’s presence at rehearsals and as a way to obtain the papers needed by them for the insurance!

All this AEG fuss was centering around June 18:

Q. And the day you did the Google search was on what day?

A. It was on the 18th of June.

…Ms. Bina (for AEG). To be clear, your honor, I’m only asking for her to explain the reasons why she didn’t conduct broader searches on the 18th. … I’m only asking that she be able to repeat a conversation she had with Dr. Murray on the 18th…. What the witness will testify, your honor, is that she felt comfortable doing this sort of limited search just to check that he was basically who he said he was because of his assurances that he had a long-term relationship with Michael Jackson and had treated him for three years …And that was part of — part of her thinking and reasoning and part of why she conducted the search that she did, specifically that he had said, “I treated him for three years,” that kind of thing.

… Mr. Bloss (for the Jacksons). So now we get into did Ms. Jorrie tell Mr. Phillips that Murray said Jackson was in great health when, in fact, Phillips knew that he was not in great health because he’d been getting reports, he had done the, quote, intervention meeting on the 16th.

… Ms. Bina. If that’s the case, your honor, I think the June 23rd statements by Dr. Murray would also come in.

Judge. What’s the June 23rd statement? Was that the police statement?

Ms. Bina. No. His statements to Ms. Jorrie when he repeatedly affirmed to her again that Michael Jackson was in good health in connection with the insurance stuff, and he’d only had his file for three years and it would be very tiny.

So one more piece of truth is becoming clearer.

In mid-June AEG realized that Murray could be a great help to them not only in terms of forcing Michael to go to rehearsals, but in terms of obtaining the insurance too – he claimed he had a file for 3 years, though a very tiny one, and this could be presented as at least something to the insurers to satisfy their requirements for the physical to be made on July 6 in London.

When the practical use of Murray was finally brought home to AEG they hurried up with his contract. For a month and a half before that they couldn’t care less about Murray and what he was doing to Michael. Actually they noticed Murray for the first time only when he had the audacity to give Michael a sick leave on June 12 which was followed by the ‘intervention’. If Kai Chase in her testimony was indeed speaking about mid-June (which I am still slightly in doubt of), then it was that very intervention meeting which Murray left muttering to himself that (even) he “can’t take this shit any more”.

But who was Murray to AEG before they finally noticed him? From the fact that they were not paying him money or attention it seems that they regarded him as Michael’s doctor who was none of their business and no matter what they promised to Murray or Michael Jackson they were leaving both of them to their own devices.

From Tohme we know that Michael insisted that the doctor’s salary should be paid by AEG (without any further recoupment), and AEG did indeed include Murray into their budget but until mid-June all this was done half-heartedly, with much dragging of their feet. AEG  was “stalling” Murray and Michael Jackson together with him. The reason for that was economizing of course – they did not want to pay Murray and even tried to manipulate the dates in order to cut Murray’s salary at least by two months (the draft said that the contract was to take effect on June 24 and it was only after Murray noticed it that Kathy Jorrie changed it to May 1).

But after the intervention meeting things drastically changed and without realizing it Kathy Jorrie herself is explaining to us the difference between “before” and “after”. What she essentially says is that previously they could not care less about Murray as they regarded him to be in Michael’s employment, but when they finally realized his usefulness and finally made a contract with him his status changed – now he was an AEG’s employee, was to provide services requested of him by the Producer, or otherwise why need the contract at all?

Q. Would it surprise you to have heard that Dr. Murray was fully engaged with Mr. Jackson in May 2009?

A. Not at all, Ms. Bina.

Ms. Bina. Why not?

A. Because I understood from Dr. Conrad Murray and — as well that Michael Jackson — excuse me — Dr.Conrad Murray was Michael Jackson’s personal physician for three years.

Ms. Bina. Dr. Murray actually told you that?

A. He did.

Q. Did you ever tell Murray — Dr. Murray not to perform services to Mr. Jackson until his agreement with AEG Live was fully executed?

A. Of course not.

Q. And, again, why not?

A. The reason, Ms. Bina, is because Dr. Conrad Murray was Michael Jackson’s physician, and it would not have been my place to suggest that he shouldn’t perform services for a patient that had been his patient for a number of years.

Ms. Bina. Did Dr. Murray need an agreement with AEG Live to treat his long-term patient?

A. No, he did not need an agreement with AEG Live to perform services for a patient of his, including Michael Jackson.

But if they realized that Murray did not need an agreement with AEG to perform services for Michael why did AEG insert themselves between Murray and MJ then? And why did they do it in mid-June in particular?

If there was no specific reason for bringing the doctor into the fold for purposes of their own they could have given Michael an advance and he could have paid Murray from that sum, without any involvement of AEG into the deal. But AEG did get in, drafted a direct employer/employee contract with Murray and were finally ready to go with him into contractual relations.

The fact that it was a direct employer/employee contract is confirmed by several things in that contract. One of them is that Murray was to provide services requested of him by the Producer, and the second is that the contract allowed AEG to terminate Murray at any time and this could be done without Michael Jackson’s consent:

 Q. I’m talking about producer. There were terms where the producer had several ways to terminate Dr. Murray’s agreement that did not require Mr. Jackson’s consent, correct?

K.Jorrie: Consent wasn’t written into this document; so yes, I think that’s correct.

Imagine yourselves in Murray’s shoes for a moment, and you will realize that the party who can fire you is your real boss. Michael could also fire Murray but he had to take an indirect route – first he was to complain to AEG and it was their job to take the final decision.

And after that AEG has the audacity to dispute that Murray was not in their employment? And that there was no conflict of interest?  Who do they take us for? Complete idiots? And I am not even saying that Kathy Jorrie did not send Murray’s contract to any of Michael’s representatives! What did they need them for? It was a matter between AEG and Murray only, and it was only their adding Michael’s signature to that contract which gave one more twist to this already crooked story. I doubt that this was done with Michael’s consent but since at the moment I cannot prove it I won’t go into that.

MURRAY’S SERVICES FOR THE ARTIST? NO, FOR PRODUCER! 

If you are still undecided whether Conrad Murray had or didn’t have a conflict of interest in this matter please look at the notorious phrase in his contract saying that he was to perform the services requested of him by the Producer.

This phrase alone points to the obvious – Conrad Murray had a terrible conflict of interest between a friend and an employer.

And it does not even matter who was to pay Murray money. If Murray was performing services requested by the Producer and this Producer was to pay for those services, it was a simple case of Murray being in direct AEG’s employment.

And if Michael was to pay and Murray was nevertheless performing the services requested of him by the Producer, it makes things even worse – MJ pays him for being his personal doctor, but Murray still does what is requested of him by someone else! This way Murray gets money from one person but actually works for another one, and it is only due to AEG’s gigantic efforts to cloud the picture and drown us in a thousand technicalities that people are still having a problem with understanding so clear a matter.

One of the experts who was called to cloud our vision was Dr. Gary Green, a sports medicine expert testifying for AEG.  Just one quote from Gary Green is enough for us to explain how far he is ready to go to stretch the truth in favor of AEG. He testified on day 71, week 16 of the trial:

AEG called their next expert witness, Dr. Gary Green. Attorney Jessica Stebbins Bina is doing direct examination.

The doctor said he spent about 115 hours in this case, bills $500 per hour. He said he’s billed approximately $20,000 to $25,000 up-to-date

There will be about $25,000 to $30,000 to be billed, total approximately $50,000.

Bina asked if he agrees with Dr. Matheson this is a conflict of interest case. “I disagree with Dr. Matheson completely,” Dr. Green said.

Dr. Green pointed out Dr. Murray asked to change the contract to limit him to perform services requested by artist, not producer. “I believe that it further demonstrates Dr. Murray’s independence from AEG Live.”

This request “further demonstrates Dr. Murray’s independence from AEG Live? Even if Murray mustered all his independence to make a request isn’t it much more important whether the request was met or denied? And the request was denied, but despite that Murray quickly signed the contract which blatantly said that his primary responsibility was performing services requested of him by Producer.

Where do they get unbiased experts like that I wonder? Or is it the number of hours billed by them that distorts their perception so much? Well, the above told us all we need to know about Dr. Gary Green so that will be all about this expert in this post.

However there is one more person in the Michael Jackson environment who attracts our attention by misrepresenting the truth about Murray’s contract, and this person is Ivy, one of the Senior Staff of MJJCommunity fan forum.

I thought that nothing can amaze me about the Senior Staff of MJJCommunity any longer, but this time Ivy really amazed me by a nearly open declaration of her extreme bias towards AEG. It was the openness of it which was so amazing – knowing how careful these people are, so open an attempt to distort the truth was indeed a surprise.

The instance I am talking about is when Ivy posted a comparison of two drafts of Conrad Murray’s contract and pointed out to MJ’s fans that  in the phrase about whose requests were to be met by Murray the Producer was replaced by the Artist.

Ivy is a longtime Senior Staff of MJJCommunity who has taken upon herself the task of making the ‘full’ summary of Katherine Jackson vs. AEG Live case. After each post she gets a mass of thanks from the grateful MJ fans.

Her access to exclusive information is indeed amazing and makes us realize that she is privy to the AEG case – for example, she can provide you with a summary of a video deposition no one has yet seen at the AEG trial, but her strange choice of facts and lack of pertinent comment on them is like a bucket of cold water each time – you simply don’t expect a fan to shower you with all this negativism and then leave you to cope with it without any help, and this is what makes you wonder.

And negativism about MJ is prevailing over everything else in those reports. If you want to know what AEG experts say about Michael Jackson addiction issues the summary of each will be readily available to you in the form of short bullets for easier consumption, and the latest AEG motions on considering the case a “non-suit” (non-existent) will also come there in much detail with the main ideas singled out in bold type.

However none of it will be balanced by the summaries from the experts on the Plaintiff’s side. In fact several months of their testimonies are simply omitted in this ‘full’ summary case and after the beginning of the trial sometime in March-April all information is resumed only now, when it is AEG’s turn to present their case.

It was actually while looking for the latest motions of both sides in this case that I found what Ivy is writing about Conrad Murray’s contract. “Writing” about it is a grave exaggeration of course because all we have is a crypt comment that it is “2 versions of Murray’s contract”undated early version http://www.scribd.com/doc/128116431/CM-AEG-Agreement and june 23rd version http://www.scribd.com/doc/158739657/…ne-23-Contract

This is followed by a comment that it has to do with “producer / artist changes mentioned at testimony” and then by the groundbreaking news that “the earlier version” that “mentioned services requested by producer (part 1)” was replaced by “services requested by artist (part 1 changed)” in the june 23 version of Murray’s contract.

MJJ Community continued August 10, 2009

This super-short text is accompanied by the two variants of the contract for individual study.

Let us look at this scarce text agan and first compare our impressions of what we read.  Our impression is that someone (?) testified at the AEG trial and said that the earlier draft was about Murray performing services requested by the Producer but  in the final variant Producer was replaced by the Artist. If taken in combination with Gary Green’s words about Conrad Murray’s ‘independence’ you indeed get the impression that Murray requested a change and the request was met.

This is how myths are created.

The reality is that this change never happened in terms of Murray’s responsibilities, and the only other change in this respect was made in another part (Scope of Services) of the contract and this change was made in favor of AEG, and absolutely not in favor of Michael Jackson.

This is when I started looking for the testimonies where this information could be contained and this is how I ended up reading Kathy Jorrie’s two days of testimony. It is she who spoke about that change in the Scope of Services section of Murray’s contract:

Q. So if we look at paragraph 1 here, this is where you change the “producer” to “artist” under scope of services, correct?

A. Yes.

Q. And this version, along with the first two, provided, without in any way limiting any other term or provision, Murray and GCA shall perform the services reasonably requested by producer, correct?

A. You’re now looking at something other than the one –

Q. 4.1. Let’s go to that. 4.1, just like the first two versions of the agreement that you drafted and sent to Mr. Trell, said that Dr. Murray was to perform the services reasonably requested by the producer, right?

A. Yes, it said that.

Q. And that was in every one of the versions that you wrote, correct?

A. Yes.

I bet that you didn’t understand a single word of what they are discussing here, so let me explain.  Each draft Kathy Jorrie made said that Murray’s responsibility was to perform the services requested of him by Producer, but in the Scope of Services the word was indeed changed. The word “change” sticks to your memory and creates the impression that at least in some respect the Producer did meet Murray’s request,  but to think that way would be a big mistake  – AEG absolutely DID NOT meet Murray’s request and made a change in their favor.

All three drafts of Murray’s contract stated that his Number One Responsibility was an obligation to perform services reasonably requested by PRODUCER.

Why is it his ‘responsibility’? Because it comes in the section of “Responsibilities of Dr. Murray”.

Why is it his ‘number one’ responsibility?  Because even numerically it comes first in the list of his responsibilities:

Murray's Number one responsibility

However one small change was indeed made in Murray’s contract and it came in a different paragraph called “The Scope Services”. After reading it we even guess why the correction was made – AEG themselves realized that it was their big mistake as it actually contradicted their 4.1 point.

This is how it initially looked, in the earlier draft of the contract – the Scope of Murray’s Services included:

  • tending to the Artist’s general medical needs and assisting and treating the Artist in the case of a medical emergency. Dr. Murray shall also provide such other services as are reasonably requested by Producer from time to time during the term hereof.

The implication is that the services are to be focused on the Artist, but from time to time Dr. Murray will also provide the services requested of him by Producer. This paragraph about the Scope of Services would sound even okay, but only if we forgot that another paragraph in the same contract said that Murray’s Number One Responsibility was to follow AEG’s requests.

Now comes the final draft of the contract made on June 23, 2009 provided by our knowledgeable Ivy and the final wording of the same paragraph. This variant has been corrected and says that Murray’s Scope of Services is:

  • tending to the Artist’s general medical needs and assisting and treating the Artist in the case of a medical emergency. Dr. Murray shall also provide such other services as are reasonably requested by Artist from time to time during the term hereof.

Now the meaning has changed into its opposite:  previously Dr. Murray was to provide the services requested of him by the producer only from time to time, but now the services to the Artist will be provided from time to time while the main services are to be given to the Producer.

The final wording put everything into one line – Murray’s Responsibility Number One is to service the Producer, but from time to time he will be allowed to also provide services requested of him by Michael Jackson!

It is very generous of course of AEG to allow Murray from time to time to provide services requested of him by Michael Jackson , but now we understand that this change only worsened the situation for Michael Jackson and made the terms of Murray’s work harsher than before.

Murray is once again told by AEG not to forget himself and remember who his boss is. If previously we could probably have some doubts, the final variant of this contract does not allow any room for misinterpretation – Murray’s employer is AEG.

After “corrections” like that Murray had to force Michael to rehearse even when he could barely drag his feet after a sleepless night.  Now Murray could no longer give Michael a sick leave as he did it before, on June 12.  And Murray’s services to AEG also included taking care of the medical files for the insurance on the night when Michael died. As a result he put Michael on Propofol and left him unmonitored because he had to run about with those papers and it was during all that text-messaging activity that his patient stopped breathing and Murray did not notice.

Do you get all this crucial information about those changes in the contract wording from the Senior Staff of MJJCommunity? Absolutely not! Moreover the impression we get from Ivy’s post is that Murray’s contract was changed in favor of the Artist, and I am very much afraid that this distortion of the truth was the whole idea of that information.

Why does it give me the creeps to know that this kind of guidance has been provided to MJ’s fans on a continuous basis since September 2009?

* * *

HAPPY BIRTHDAY, MICHAEL JACKSON!

Jolie:  Mark 6:4 “But Jesus said to them, “A prophet is not without honor except in his own country…

André RieuEarth Song / Tribute to Michael Jackson, 2009.  This video is recorded in Maastricht – Netherlands and broadcasted by the German Television ZDF on Aug. 1, 2009

Heal the world, South Africa, 2010

lammegoedzak : “If there’s one thing MJ did, it was bring people together..and they still do, no matter what race or color… if you look it that way, he has healed the world a bit”

annieRU0k58:  ”Heal the World should be the anthem of the United Nations…and I’m not kidding”.

Patti Labelle & Daryl Coley - Will You Be There [Michael Jackson NAACP, 1993]

Michael Jackson: "Thank you to my mother. Thank you for giving me life. I really mean that. I love you" [1993]

Michael Jackson: “Thank you to my mother. Thank you for giving me life. I really mean that. I love you”

99von: “An amazing and special person, Michael Jackson, was honestly loved and respected here. The same amazing, respected, special person, Michael Jackson, is right now floged and violated by media in 2013. Four years after passing away again and more than ever. Its a shame!”
"She is the one in blue"

“She is the one in blue”

Michael Jackson: “Thank you to my mother who is here tonight. She is the one in blue. Thank you for giving me life. I really mean it. I love you.

There are two things which the NAACP stands for which are the most important things in my life – Freedom and Equality.

In every person there’s a secret song in their heart. It says, “I’m free”. It says, “I’m one”. This is the natural feeling of every child to be fress as the wind, to be one with every other child.

All the trouble in the world is caused by forgetting this feeling and when I perform my connection with people is just to remind of that  - to be free and to be one…”


Filed under: AEG THE HORRIBLE, Jacksons vs. AEG Tagged: AEG Live, Conrad Murray, insurance, Kathy Jorrie, Michael Jackson

TIME TO REMEMBER THE REAL MICHAEL Best Tributes To Michael Jackson

$
0
0

Michael’s birthday was a great chance to get some respite from all this AEG sordid business. They say that in September there will be fewer court sessions so we can relax a bit and remember the man we are talking about here. The real man and not another of those caricatures painted to us by AEG and whoever is serving their needs.

Actually what I wanted to find was the best 2013 tribute to Michael Jackson on his 55th birthday, but as a result of several days of looking ended up with a whole collection of the greatest MJ tributes for the whole period after his death. All of them are remarkable and even if they were made four years ago forgetting them would be a crime.

This is how this collection came into being – let us remember the way Michael really was.

BLACK AND WHITE

Behind the scenes of Black Or White. Shooting the panther dance

Behind the scenes of Black Or White. Shooting the panther dance

Several great videos were made by a black man who goes by the name of Phonchrist on Youtube. His tributes to Michael are in themselves a work of art and great inspiration where he says words of much wisdom about Michael:

“Michael was touched by God and persecuted by Man but honored by Us, his fans.”

He also collected in one video other people’s thoughts about MJ that are a must to know. I managed to make out only a couple of things:

  • Making Black Or White.  Michael Jackson with the girl Sage

    Michael Jackson with the girl Sage on the set of making Black or White

    “Michael Jackson … is becoming a politically, spiritually and very morally-conscious young man. And what those in power are afraid of is that he will use the magnetism of his appeal to awaken his fans and take them to a higher level of consciousness. 

  • He is an extraordinary young man. Very much not of this world. You know why he loves children? Not because he is a ped-le. You know why he loves animals? Not because he is crazy. But he sees in children God… They love Michael and Michael loves them, and he feels at home with children because he is in non-threat.
  • But when he is with adults everybody would come to him with a gain, with a hand-out, with some kind of deceitful thing he don’t want to be bothered –  that’s why he said that if children were not on the planet I’m done.  –And that’s what Jesus said — Unless you become as a little child —-”
  • “I’m proud of my heritage. I’m proud to be black. I’m honored to be black. And I just hope that one day they will be fair and portray me the way I really, really am. A loving and peaceful guy who wanted to make wonderful and unprecedented entertainment – songs, music and films for the world – that’s all I wanted to do. I’m no threat, that’s all I wanted to do.” – Michael Jackson
  • “To the country and the world. A young man has left Earth… This was a talented, multi-talented person who entertained the world with his dynamic portrayals, the songs he had written, by his style of dancing. And we think it is appropriate to say that we pay tribute to the culture that he has left us” – In US Congress
  • “His heart couldn’t get any bigger and yesterday it arrested. I come on the floor today on behalf of the generation to thank God for letting all of us live in his generation and in his era. With that, madam Speaker, we will ask to please stand for a moment of silence.” -In US Congress

The era of Michael Jackson… Though these words may look to some as an exaggeration the truth of the matter is that in a couple of decades few will be really able to say off hand what particular presidents were in power during Michael’s lifetime and an opposite thing is most likely to happen – people will remember who was in power by the pictures of Michael with Reagan giving him an award or Michael singing at Clinton’s inauguration, which will actually show to mankind the value of each of these figures – at least in the minds of ordinary people.

Michael Jackson  A Black Man’s Dream

.

The video is called Michael Jackson: A Black Man’s Dream. And it is perfectly correct of course. Michael belongs to the black heritage, so how can it be any different? But it also true that due to his Vitiligo the Heavens made this black porcelain white. And there is something deeply symbolic about this transformation which was none of his doing and was actually a source of much suffering to him.

It was as if the Heavens wanted him to belong to both races at once and probably use him as a way to bring them together or even put him above any race and thus turn the race matter into a non-issue. And a non-issue it will become when all people are given equal opportunities, and then each will be judged individually and not as someone carrying on his shoulders a ton of prejudice in favor or against his race.

It looks like God didn’t want it to be a confrontation, but wanted it as black and white fused together and showed it on the example of a singular person like Michael. To me Michael seems to be more than just a black man’s dream – he is more like any man’s dream because it is actually everyone’s dream to be free and have equal opportunities with others. And it should also be everyone’s dream to devote one’s life to striving for perfection as Michael did and bringing out one’s talent, and working very hard to make it happen.

I really hope that one day Michael will become every person’s dream and example to follow in terms of  selflessness and generosity similar to the one with which he shared his talent and whole self with us. In terms of his unaffected humility and lack of arrogance and total absence of self-conceit that makes too many people now put their precious ego into the centre of the universe.

What a fantastic world we could live in if only Michael became everyone’s dream as to his gentleness and love for others, his innocence and purity, his love of God and striving for perfection!

STRIVING FOR PERFECTION

It was from the point of view of seeking perfecton that I continued to look for the best tributes to Michael Jackson made since 2009. And the next video came from Phonchrist again. It was made in 2012 and is called “Better on the other side” after someone’s song . Remembering what Michael had to endure when he was alive this is absolutely true – we here are living in so much hell that he is for sure now on the better side of it if I understood the meaning of those words correctly.

Here is a great quote from the video which says that Michael is a beacon that could show us the way out:

  • “People are now trying to remember the joy that he brought into everyone’s life, and also the sheer greatness of his talent which is what you should be applauding. This is probably once-in-our-lifetime that we saw a real beacon

Michael Jackson – Better On The Other Side

.

You won’t believe it by the next best video will again be by Phonchrist. It was made in 2013 and is called “Michael Jackson 4 years among Angels”. The author said about MJ:

  • “Your presence on earth was a blessing for many of us and even after you’re gone we are still feeling the love we learnt from you everyday in our lives”.

That’s true. Michael had a lasting effect on all of us, and I will even venture to say that people have done some reflection on a mass scale and have already changed a little bit. The people in the video also say something to this effect:

  • “Sometimes you don’t know what you have until you lose it. And if we had known what we know now, we would have taken better care of him”.
  • “All of us want he were back here”.
  • “He was the prime definition of someone who would care for everyone.”
  • “He made me believe I could do anything I want to do.”
  • “People called him a freak. People called him different. People said he wasn’t doing things the right way. But he did it the right way!”
  • “Okay, you don’t like Michael, but you probably don’t like puppies and kids either?”
  • “This man has done monumental things people can only dream of….”

All of it is in this video:

Michael Jackson 4 years among the Angels

.

Next comes Andre Rieu’s tribute to Michael Jackson part of which we have already heard. The tribute included Michael’s Earth Song, Heal the World, Ben and probably some others. The concert took place in Maastricht, Netherlands in 2009 and was broadcast by the German Television ZDF on Aug. 1, 2009.

Our Susanne watched it and was amazed to see so many people crying in what could hardly be a fan audience.  It looked like it dawned on all these people all at once that they had lost someone dear to them, someone too young and someone too special, and these sincere tears is the reason why I included Ben performed by Andre Rieu into this collection.

André Rieu - Ben / Tribute to Michael Jackson

.

If the above made you recall the time after Michael’s death as weeks of almost incessant crying the next video will probably make you laugh, and also inspire and amaze you by the skill, youthfullness and childlike spirit of an old man dancing to Michael’s music.

This footage was made behind the scenes of ‘Hollywood tonight’ video where the old man was taking part (he was shown there standing on the pavement and nodding his head to the rhythm). Well, over here he is actually dancing, and given that he was almost 70 at the time of making the film this is indeed a miracle Michael’s music is capable of doing to people.

The Best Old Man Michael Jackson Dancer

.

And this young man is another phenomenon. His name is Kurt Hugo Schneider and he is singing a medley of Michael Jackson’s songs as several men in a choir. You have probably seen this tribute before, but I absolutely don’t want to lose it, so it also goes down into the collection:

Michael Jackson Medley

.

That time inspired people to create absolutely phenomenal things. One of them is the 2 Cellos Luka Sulic and Stjepan Hauser playing their arrangement of Smooth Criminal. The performance is indeed remarkable – in fact I never knew that a cello as a musical instrument is capable of such a superb sound:

2CELLOS - Smooth Criminal

.

And Smooth Criminal performed by David Garrett has long been one of my favorites. There is no word to describe what a marvel it is:

David Garrett - Smooth Criminal

.

Next comes the dance page of the collection.

MICHAEL MADE THE WORLD DANCE

The flash mob that started it all was first held in Sweden by a Bounce dance group who danced to Michael’s Beat on July 8, 2009. This was the time when everyone was still in a state of shock from Michael’s death and their flash mob gave a new direction to outpouring the feeling – it was unexpected, mass, top professional and much fun.

A minute ago they pretended they never saw each other and the next minute the whole square was dancing like one, and after doing so remarkable a thing they returned to their everyday life leaving everyone around stunned and shattered to their very core. Michael was a prankster and if he were alive he would appreciate it very much.

It even seemed to me that there was something defiant about the dancers’ gesture at the time – the media was habitually pouring tons of dirt on Michael and in these conditions it was extremely important to show them what the ‘masses’ think. And they did show.

This is how the Swedish group set the ball rolling and since then the wave of ‘Beat it’ flashdances circled the planet several times over and is still not ebbing away. From the videos I’ve seen this year it is going full swing in Japan and their part of the world.

Stockholm Michael Jackson Tribute

July 8, 2009

.

The Romanian fans also did a great job. They had a great many variants of flash dances and not one but several teams stopping the traffic here and there, but for this collection I’ve selected this one:

MICHAEL JACKSON DAY – IN ROMANIA-BUCHAREST

.

In fact after Michael’s death there were so many flash mobs that a young man named Petenaldo on Youtube made a compilation from almost everywhere giving us the idea of the great tide that swept the world in its manifestation of love for Jackson.

Seeing it one commentator made an absolutely true observation. It contains some words not meant for print, so I’ll translate his idea as follows: if so many people around the world are doing the same great job all at once why the hell is there so much international bickering and wars?

Remembering that the song the people are dancing to is ‘Beat it’ and Michael wrote it to show that it is absolutely unnecessary to arrange fights in order to look ‘cool’ the above observation does not sound to me like a mere joke it first seemed – why indeed is it so difficult to find common language if Michael’s music and dance can so easily and so effectively bring people together?

Here is Petenaldo’s collection of flashmobs:

 Michael Jackson ♫ Best FLASHMOB ♥ (Around the world)

A tribute flashmob-compilation to the greatest entertainer ever = The King of Pop:  0:08 Stockholm, 1:12 Berlin,1:32 Bucharest, 1:54 Paris, 2:17 Seattle, 2:35 Tokyo, 2:49Napoli, 3:08 Moscow, 3:29 Bremen, 3:35 Macau, 3:49 Berlin,4:03 Mannheim, 4:42 Hong Kong, 5:02 Montreal, 5:31 Munich,5:40 Perugia, 6:42 St. Petersburg, 7:15 Strasbourg, 7:31 Sydney,7:43 Taipei, 8:03 Torino, 8:44 Tübingen, 9:01 Hamburg, 9:07Mexico, 9:24 Cologne, 9:45 Amsterdam.

.

The collection of flashmobs will be incomplete if we forget about the dancing of prisoners experiment in the Philippines.  In 2009 CNN informed its viewers that the warden of a prison on the island on Cebu, who was a fan of Michael Jackson introduced dance as a method to reform the worst criminals kept there. First of all it kept the people busy training 4 hours a day 5 days a week and it also allowed many of them to show their talents and introduced an element of healthy competition between themselves, as a result of which the relations between the inmates changed and all the in-fighting that had plagued the place ceased.

People are getting their self-esteem back and even the children of those serving life sentences for murder are proud to show their fathers on the screen when the performances are put up by the chief warden on Youtube. Public performances are held once a month (they are probably even earning money this way), so it does not leave time for any nonsense for both inmates and prison administration.

CNN reported that “dance was introduced into prison life as a way to eliminate gang and violence” and that “this form of rehabilitation has outstanding results” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhkIRtKJwyA&NR=1

The version where the warden is dancing among the prisoners to Michael Jackson’s Dangerous is probably the greatest one – it is indeed amazing stuff that gives you a totally surreal feeling.

Who said that miracles are impossible? You simply didn’t try!

Dancing Inmates are “Dangerous”

.

If you think that flash mobs have subsided by 2013 you will be wrong. It is only in this part of the world that our minds are crammed with AEG’s stuff and media nastiness taking away half of our energy and spirit, but if you look at what is going on Japan and that region as a whole you’ll get a different impression. The people there do not allow themselves to get so easily distracted and know what they are doing.

This is a Japanese flash mob repeated on June 23 this year twice during the day – at 1pm and at 3pm. The second one was even better in quality but shot at a distance so I have chosen the first one for the collection:

20130623 MJフラッシュモブお台場 Beat it 13:00

.

And in this flash mob I was especially taken by a middle-aged woman in a kimono with a flag behind her back:

Tribute to Michael Jackson(大須観音2013)

.

I really had to omit numerous other flash mobs held in the streets of Japan, Hong Kong, South Korea and other places this year because there are too many of them to quote. The general impression is that the whole region is dancing to Michael Jackson’s music. Some flashdances are turning into full-time concerts:

名古屋でBeat It ! 2013 (オアシス21 銀河の広場)

 

.

And this 2013 flash mob comes from the opposite part of the world – from Chile:

Flashmob Michael Jackson – Estación central 2013

.

In short once it started I hope it never stops. Another great video from Petenaldo is explaining why this is happening – the reason is that Michael simply made the world dance. 

Here are some quotes from the video:

  • “Michael Jackson… I don’t even know where you even begin to describe a global superstar like Michael Jackson was.  We will not see his like again. He changed the face of music and dance in the world. Not just in this country, but in the world. He did Indian dancing. He did American dancing. He did African dancing. He did Russian dancing. This was a man who tried to bring the world of dance together, for himself. This is a life to celebrate, this is a life that remains inspirational for anybody who listens to music, anybody who wants to dance… Every single week we go out to audition, and at every single one you hear ‘I started dancing because of Michael Jackson.’  And that is the legacy he leaves us. He changed the face of dancing around the world, he changed the whole idea of pop videos round the world”.
  • “His music combined energy and imagination with irresistible beats and bass lines. His genius earned him thirteen Grammies, fourteen Number One singles and record-breaking album sales captivating fans around the world.”
  • “I think it’s worth remembering that he was probably the single greatest dancer and musician the world has ever seen.”
  • “And I hope people understand that this was a human being who cared deeply for humanity.”
  • “Music has lost the king, music has lost the legend, music has the icon… God needed an extra angel, so he came and got Michael to work for him”
  • “This music had an extra layer of inexplicable magic that didn’t just make you want to dance but actually made you believe that you could fly, dare to dream, be anything that you wanted to be. Because that is what he rose to… and Michael Jackson was  a hero.”

(someone should read these words to AEG because they simply didn’t know who they were dealing with).

Will.i.am:

  • “There’ll never be an artist that will impact the world the way you have. There’ll never be an artist to sell as many records as you. Never. Thank you so much. You’ve made the world a wonderful place. You’ve brought us joy and we thank you for that. And we will pray for you and your family. We’ll always love you. Thank you, Michael Jackson”.

Madonna:

  • “I want to end this on a positive note and say that my sons aged 9 and 4 are obsessed with Michael Jackson. There is a lot of crotch-grabbing and moonwalking that’s going on in my house, and it seems like a whole new generation of kids has discovered his genius and are bringing him to life again. I hope that wherever Michael is right now, he is smiling about his. .. Yes, Michael Jackson was a human being, but damn it, he was a King. Long live the King”.

Even if it did not contain the above quotes the video should go into our collection for the unique episode of Michael’s sequined gloves falling from the sky in a snowfall of gloves. Here is the video:

 MICHAEL JACKSON made the WORLD DANCE

.

Professional dancing is going a slightly different way. They learned from Michael everything he taught them for the past 40 years or so and are now taking his legacy further. In some cases it inspires them to create truly fantastic choreography.  I’ve selected some videos dropping those whose authors have the cheek to ask who is better – this dancer or Michael Jackson?

To me it sounds like an absurd, silly and ignorant question. First of all Michael wasn’t only a dancer – he was an all-round musician who composed his own phenomenal music which none of these dancers can do, and second Michael looks to me like the origin of this dance. He created the concepts of today’s choreography out of which they are now building something new. If it weren’t for him the singers would probably be still standing at the microphone today, at least in some countries.

Here are the examples of dancers making tributes to Michael Jackson. Temecula Dance Company performed the Man in the Mirror dance on July 9, 2009 at MGM Grand Hotel KAR National Finals.

Michael Jackson - Man in the Mirror Dance Tribute

.

Jabbawockeez – Michael Jackson Tribute ABDC episode 5

.

Keone Madrid | The way you make me feel

Keone said about this video:

  • “No concept or story behind this. Just wanted to explore the art of MJ. It’s pretty hard to find good, genuine music these days. So going back to blasting MJ on the speakers never fails. *Michael Scream* OOOOOOOh … Miss you Mike!

.

The French twins are dancing to a remix of “Whatever happens” by Michael Jackson.

Les Twins – Michael Jackson

.

Kenichi Ebina: “A Tribute to Someone Special” Michael Jackson

.

To close the subject of professionals making tributes to Michael Jackson let me show to you my favourite one. It is coming from Northern Uganda and was posted by Phonchrist again.  Despite all the sophistication of the other videos some looked to me as a slightly artificial experiment while the tribute from Uganda is genuine, warm and heartfelt which makes you come back to watch it again and again.

Actually I am almost addicted to it. The singer seems to be singing not only about Michael Jackson but the whole of his family, mentioning mamma, pappa and baby Jackson and each brother and sister by their names.

Here is a memorial dance by Acholi Heartbeat dancers from Northern Uganda (Gulu).

Dr Abe Greatest African tribute to Michael Jackson

.

We’ve seen the fun of flash mobs and perfection of professional performances, and heard all the good words said about Michael’s genius and his great musical legacy.

But does it give you the impression that all this is describing Michael the way he really was? I’m afraid it doesn’t. Well yes, partially it does, but even if we fully agree with every good word said about his phenomenal art you still feel that a whole lot more is still missing.

CAPTURING THE INVISIBLE

In the attempt to capture this other thing which is evidently invisible to the eye I went in another direction and tried the interview which Michael’s bodyguard Marvin Butts gave soon after his death. From Marvin’s demeanor you can gather that it is extremely painful for him to talk – he often sighs and shakes his head. But what he is saying is crucial for understanding what Michael was like.

Unfortunately the sound is a disaster, so here is what I managed to decipher (please correct):

Q. What part is the easiest one for you? What part can you talk of without breaking…?

A. (shaking his head) I don’t know… It was fun working for him… and it’s hard to realize he is gone.

Q. What made him different?

A. Michael had a certain type of magic.  I know people hear his songs and say he’s magic, but Michael had a way… just if you spent any time with him you become changed for the better… He uplifted. Eye-opener. Your spirit changed more for the joy and happiness. You become like him and help change the world. Or change people……. It was just so much spirit, uplifting and fun….. and (pauses)… it’ll never be another Michael…. (shakes his head)… there is no way to replace him.

You know… I know a whole lot of people that’s connected who are hurting right now. And they think about what they are going to do… and how they feel…. But the good part of Michael is what he’s leaving behind. A legacy of love, peace, a job that he didn’t finish, so hopefully we can get together and do what he wanted. And that was world peace and solve the hunger problem.

Q. Do you think the kids and the world peace meant to him more than his music?

A. Oh without a doubt. They had one neck in neck – his music and his kids. Not his personal kids – just kids of the whole world. That’s what he lived for. That was his energy, that was his motivation.  If you listen to every single song… up to Billie Jean came, that’s when the whole music changed… There was so much about Michael… When I realized that James Brown’s ‘Camelwalk’ was Michael Jackson’s Moonwalk in reverse that was eye-opener. Like he took better and made it better. And I worked for James, and James’ energy was totally different than Michael’s.

Q. Why do you think he was able to achieve musically what he was able to achieve?

A. Michael was special. He was the Chosen one. He was the one God looked upon and pointed his finger on. That’s why Mike survived everything he did. He was spiritually blessed.

Q. The world mourns today. What did they lose?

A. I think everybody feels a piece of him has died as well, lost a piece of him because Michael crossed everybody (shaking his head). Michael is 50 years old, I am two years older than Michael, and he has touched people in the whole universe… I don’t think there is another person who can say that, not even a president. That’s just my opinion. 

Q. What makes it so painful for you? You consider yourself Michael Jackson’s friend, correct?

A. When you get to know somebody… and when you get to know somebody like Mike and it connects (shaking his head) it’s magic…..  It’s magic (sighs).

Q. Is there anything else you can say?

A. It’s a whole lot I’d like to say but I just can’t…

Q. What drives your emotion like right now? What can’t you bring to the surface because you break down if you say it?

A. Because Michael had so much to give and didn’t have the chance to live it

Q. Because Michael was so young? He wanted so much more to do?

A. Yes, and part two of Michael’s life was just to begin….. He’s gone too soon. 

Q. Was he capable of reclaiming his life at this point?

A. Oh, without a doubt.

Q. When you heard your heart broke?

A. And spirit too….You know, Michael, Farrah Fawsett, James Brown, my three sisters, my mother, my dad, just too many people died. I think that was the motivation we heard in that one song “Gone too soon”. I mean he’s definitely gone too soon.

Q. There is one thing when I do the story I might tread on this… So this is what I offer you: what do you need people to know about Michael Jackson? I mean they know his music, they know his videos, they know his art, but in Cincinnati, what do you need people to know tonight?

A. Michael was an angel (smiles)…. was an angel. Forget what you’ve heard. Michael made a song once “How can you judge me even if you don’t know me?” If you listen to the verse of that song … he’s an angel….

Michael Jackson Bodyguard – Marvin Butts “Michael was an Angel”

.

It is only those who didn’t know Michael find it easy to babble some nonsense about him, while those who did know him can only cry, sigh and shake their heads in utter frustration.  A similar reaction came from the girl who knew Michael very well but never made public her friendship with him. It is Kellie Parker who played the part of Katie in Michael’s “Moonwalker” when she was a little girl. Her interview about Michael is a great tribute to her friend:

Michael Jackson and Kellie Parker

Michael Jackson and Kellie Parker

Kellie Parker (Moonwalker) talks about MJ, 2009

What was taken can never be replaced: Kellie Parker who played ‘Katie’ in the film Moonwalker shared her story and relationship with Michael Jackson in an interview with Steve Freiss

Kellie: “It’s hard… (losing composure, pauses) I’ll always feel that way. I’ll always be waiting for him.”

Steve Friess: “As I understand it you remained in contact with Michael up until very recently.”

Kellie: “Yeah. I remained very close with Michael for about ten years. Then after that I continued to stay in touch with him but not as regularly, every couple of years and then I did actually see him a couple of weeks before he passed away.”

Steve: “What was the occasion?”

Kellie: “I was working on a show he came to see, sort of randomly…”

Kellie: “I do know that in his life he would struggle with being so well known, that was sort of a constant struggle throughout his life. But I do have to say, I spent a lot of time with Michael alone on set, he and I had a lot of scenes together and he taught me so much. He was so dedicated. We would go through – before we even shot he and I would spend sometimes like half an hour together just improving, ’cause he was so committed to it.

Steve: “How was the audition process for something like this, how did that go?”

Kellie: “You know it’s funny, I auditioned for it, then didn’t hear anything for six months and thought somebody else must have gotten it. Well, originally it was caused Chicago Nights. And they weren’t quite sure what exactly it was going to be.
And I actually found out a couple of years later, I was doing a press thing with Michael, and they’d asked how he’d chosen each of us. Apparently what got me the job was, they got me in to do a screen test and after the screen test they’d left the cameras rolling.

And I was such a tomboy, that was me – I had braids in my hair, I was raggedy, ripped up jeans. I was just tough! I wanted to be a guy. And Brandon did the screen test with me and we had a ball or something and he was playing with it and I went up to him and was like, ‘You’re doing it wrong! God!’ But they’d left it rolling. So that’s what Michael saw and he was like, ‘Oh my god, I have to have her.’”

Michael was magic, pure and simple. He was a man who believed in the goodness of mankind and embodied pure unconditional love for the world. I am so sad on so many levels. For the loss of an innovative genius and who was music and dance personified, for the loss of a man who loved the whole world and touched so many lives, but mostly, for me personally, the loss of a friend that I loved so dearly.

Most people don’t know about how close I was to Michael for many years following ‘Moonwalker/Smooth Criminal’ because I was never one to exploit that, even to this day I rarely talk about it, for that was a friendship that I honored and respected as private. I feel compelled at this time though, to speak of my amazing friend, as a witness to his life, and the gentleness of his soul.

He taught me so much, both as an actor and as a person, he continually inspired me to reach beyond my boundaries. He and I spent a great deal of time, one on one, while filming ‘Moonwalker.’

I remember that he told me once to never rush an emotion, that everything in life has a rhythm, and that it is the pauses and silences that speak the truth. He understood this better than anyone, he had a way of quietly inspiring everyone around him to be better than ever thought they could be. He helped so many, and inspired us all.

Michael believed in Magic, he believed that we could change the world, and he had such unconditional love that when you were around him, you couldn’t help but believe it too.

He is intertwined in all of who I am, I became a dancer because of him, I became an artist because he inspired me to dream, and a writer because he taught me the power of moving people through words and actions. I love you my friend, and I know you are in a better place, we were blessed to have you for as long as we did.” 

Source: http://mjtranslate.com/en/aboutmjs/1579

Making Black or White. Michael Jackson with Sage

Making Black or White. Michael Jackson with Sage

Recently a video about another girl playing a part in Michael’s Black or White video surfaced and was posted exactly on Michael’s 55th birthday August 29, 2013. The girl’s name is Sage and the video is about her and Michael being photographed together behind the scenes of Black or White.

She is sitting on his knee and though the sound goes down each time he says something, this imperfect video takes us much closer to that invisible side of Michael that makes all these people sigh and shake their heads when they are trying to describe him.

He was a gentle, caring and loving soul.

He hugged, kissed and rubbed this little girl’s cheek as if she were his own little daughter and treated her like one of his greatest treasures.

Making Black or White

Making Black or White. The games boys play

I am afraid even to think what the media would have told us had it not been a girl,and fortunately she is, but I am also sure that for boys MJ had something much more rough – like water fights and throwing pies into each other faces, which they also did a lot when making Black or White.

But as to little girls like Sage Michael treated them with much tenderness and total admiration. When you look at this scene you begin to understand why everyone said that he was born to be a father.

Behind the Scenes of “Black or White” – Sage with Michael Jackson

Uploaded 29.08.2013

.

This treasure of a video was found together with another one featuring children with Michael Jackson. Do you remember the  NAACP ceremony in 1993 mentioned in the previous post? Surprisingly, a continuation of it was also found and it shows Michael backstage after that ceremony.

In this video Bob Jones takes Michael to the room of his security chief Bill Bray and invites to the place a photographer who takes some photos of the serious men in suits together with Michael Jackson.

He stoically endures several takes, but when all these serious guys group together and talk he prefers the company of the children who were together with him on stage and seeing so big a contrast between the two groups I, for one, realized perfectly well why Michael preferred children to all these men in suits.

Other commentators on this video had the same impression:

  • I love how in the front all the adults are huddling up and talking to each other, and Michael’s just in the back talking to the kids, its adorable
  • Being famous takes alot of patience. I’d hate to be always be surrounded by a bunch of people, taking photos in hot, uncomfortable formal ware, shaking hands and meeting people I don’t even know (not fans), being told to not go here not there we got another meeting when I’m already dying to go back, kick off my shoes and take a long bath. MJ handles all that so gracefully.

All of it is indeed quite a sight, and though formally it isn’t a tribute to MJ I still believe that it belongs here. It explains a whole lot about Michael:

Michael Jackson – NAACP awards Backstage 1993

P.S. 

When I thought that it would be simply impossible to add a single more video to this post another interesting thing came into view which totally amazed me. Fans were clapping to this rare footage while I naturally saw something different.

The video is about the fans listening behind closed doors to Michael Jackson rehearsing at the Forum three weeks before he died – on June 3rd, 2009.

What absolutely amazed me was the date of the rehearsal. The 3rd of June? How can that be possible if AEG tells us that at the beginning of June Michael missed all rehearsals and appeared at the Forum sometime on June 6th only? “Missing rehearsals” was their never-ending complaint to Michael and now we learn that about the beginning of June they were lying too?

Previously we thought that Michael’s first rehearsal was around June 6th after which he rehearsed every single day until June 11 or 12 when he had a “bad day” according to Ortega, didn’t come on Saturday June 13th and Murray gave him a sick leave. This was followed by the June 16th intervention and all the rest of the nightmare.

And now we find that Michael was rehearsing on June 3rd ? So why was AEG so hysterical about it then? Michael had the full right not to attend any rehearsals, but he still did on AEG’s insistence and almost every day too and totally exhausted himself that way!

And the date of June 3rd cannot be a mistake because it comes from Michael’s fans who knew about his whereabouts and dates better than any police would!

Michael Jackson The Way You Make Me Feel June 3rd 2009 Rehearsal

.

Isn’t it incredible that no matter what you begin talking about it always ends with AEG?


Filed under: BRIDGE To Understanding Michael, LOVE SURVIVES Tagged: Black or White, Marvin Butts, Michael Jackson, Sage Kellie Parker

Time to know the real Michael. MAN BEHIND THE MYTH

$
0
0
Michael with a little girl Sage on the set of Black or White video

Behind the scenes of Black or White video

After seeing Michael so happy on the set of making the Black and White video we are leaving the territory of happiness and are entering the territory of pain, and the great documentary “Man behind the myth” is what will be taking us there.

The happy scene of Michael hugging the little girl Sage was just on the eve of evil allegations. It was the time when Michael was still unconditionally happy and his wings were still uncut. However from the next year of 1993 it will never be the same again and will remain like that until the last day of his life.

This is why the Man Behind The Myth documentary is a tribute to Michael Jackson of a different kind – it shows what the  media did to Michael and how they used direct or  subliminal lies to plant nasty suggestions about him.

So it is more of a lesson for us and a need to decide what to do with all the hate and lies we have inherited after Michael’s death and still have to deal with – especially these days when so much dirt is thrown at the innocent man again.

Each of us will find something to think about after watching this superb documentary. It was first released on InnerMichael website  http://www.innermichael.com/2011/09/michael-jackson-who-is-he-really-the-video/ what seems like exactly two years ago, in September 2011.

The film is embedded below, but first comes the transcript. The transcript is far from ideal but this was the best I could do, so if someone helps to correct and make it better you are most welcome to do so.

MAN BEHIND THE MYTH [Walking Moon Studios]

0: 07 Man’s voice:

  • “Michael Jackson, 50 years old, the King of Pop has died.”

Woman’s voice:

  • “Michael Jackson has died…”

0:14 Jermaine Jackson:

  • “My brother Michael Jackson, the legendary King of Pop Michael Jackson passed away on Thursday June 25th 2009, at 2:26 pm”

0:26 Author: How did it come to this?

Who he really was?

Who is Michael Jackson, really?

Michael Jackson life is a remarkable journey filled with the brightest of moments and the darkest of hours.

Who is Michael Jackson, really?

Michael was the most recognized man in the world. Friends treasured him, world leaders invited him, colleagues admired him, children naturally gravitated to him, and the public was fascinated with him.

0:58 Some cashed in on that fascination when they discovered that a story with his name got attention. It got readers and ratings. And if there was no story unethical reporters made them up because using the name “Michael Jackson” got attention. Some even launched careers writing his coat tails.

1:18 There are two Michael Jacksons – the caricature brought to you by the tabloids cashing in and the Michael described by those who actually knew him. What is the truth and who is telling it? You decide.

And instead of regular conversations between parents and children about drugs and violence, there is the deafening sound of silence.

Michael Jackson: “Instead of regular conversations between parents and children about drugs and violence, there is the deafening sound of silence.”

1:34 Michael Jackson at Carnegie Hall, New York, February 14th, 2001:

  • ‘Heal The Kids’ is about doing something, about making a difference and trying to help adults and parents realize that it’s in our power to change the world that our children live in.
  • Who among us would have believed that the sound of children at their playgrounds would be replaced by the sound of automatic machine-gun fire at our schools? That the sound of little girls skipping rope would be overshadowed by the frantic squeals of children dodging bullets? Yet (beginning to cry)  instead of loving our children more, we install metal detectors in our schools.
Instead of loving our children more (beginning to cry) we install metal detectors in our schools

“Instead of loving our children more (beginning to cry) we install metal detectors in our schools”

2: 28 Michael Jackson at Oxford University, UK, March 21st, 2001:

  • “Friends, the foundation of all human knowledge, the beginning of human consciousness, must be that each and every one of us is an object of love. Before you know if you have red hair or brown, before you know if you are black or white, before you know of what religion you are a part, you have to know that you are loved.”

2:51 Sensation gets attention. Words like “bizarre” and “freak” come right out of circus side-shows where they made fun of misfortune. Repeat something enough times and people begin to believe it. Using those tricks and others allowed the media to use Jackson for profit. And while they were focused on the color of his skin, his face and obsessing about the paternity of his children the real story – Michael Jackson, the humanitarian – went untold.

People magazine

People magazine:“Michael Jackson. He is back. He’s Bad. Is this guy weird, or what?”

3: 25 [Picture of the News of the world - Evil Empire]. A TV correspondent says:

  • “The paper is accused of paying off police or hacking into the phones of celebrities, members of the royal family and murdered teenager, victims of terrorism and war widows for years. British police say they’ve uncovered nearly four thousand hacking victims – four thousand!

3: 44 Family member of 07-07 bombing victim:

  • “It is hard to imagine that at the lowest point of your life you couldn’t get any lower and then hearing that someone may have well been listening to the very intimate conversations and you realize that things can get lower”…

3:59 David Cameron, UK Prime Minister:

  • “How do we improve the ethics and morals of the press in this country and make sure they will improve in the future?”

4:04 Family member of 07-07 bombing victim:

  • “How can people get up in the morning and think, “That’s a good idea for the sake of the story is beyond me”. [picture of Piers Morgan with News of the World in the background]

4:10 Ambush journalists take advantage too. The game is to gain someone’s confidence with promises to expose the truth, but instead ambush with surprise questioning and clever editing. Martin Bashir filmed Jackson, then released a cut-and-paste hit piece only to make a name for himself. He inserted innuendoes about children in voiceover that led another family using the same attorney to repeat an old idea – accuse Michael and extort money a second time. Instead Michael went to trial and proved his innocence.  NOT GUILTY on fourteen counts. But the damage was already done.

Subliminal messages direct you in thinking. Notice where they placed a king's crown. That's planting a suggestion

Subliminal messages direct you in thinking. Notice where they placed a king’s crown. That’s planting a suggestion

4:56 Unethical journalism is not above using subliminal messages to direct you in thinking. Notice in this promo where they placed a king’s crown. That’s not an accident – that’s planting a suggestion.

5:07 Correspondent:

  • “Martin Bashir and his crew were here at Neverland.  They got to witness what was to become an almost weekly experience – busloads of children, some from the inner city, some orphans, some terminally ill, but all of them escaping the reality to spend the day at Michael Jackson’s creation.”

5:27 “About Michael’s ranch Martin Bashir’s on-air comment was:

  • “One of the most disturbing things is the fact that a lot of disadvantaged children go to Neverland. It’s a dangerous place for a vulnerable child to be.”

But what he said behind the scenes was this:

  • “I was here yesterday and I saw it, and it’s nothing short of a spiritually kind thing”.

5:52 Thomas Mesereau:

  • “He made Michael Jackson think this is going to be a positive documentary and Michael trusted him partly because he had worked with Princess Diana”.
This is what Bashir said in the film

This is what Bashir said in the film: “It’s a dangerous place for a vulnerable child to be”

6:01 Correspondent: “This comment about Michael’s method of raising children was included on Bashir’s special:

  • “They’re restricted… They are overly protected. I was angry at the way his children were made to suffer”.
And this is what Bashir said in private:

And this is what Bashir said in private: “I was here yesterday and I saw it, and it’s nothing short of a spiritually kind thing”

But this was not:

  • “Your relationship with your children is spectacular. And in fact, it, it almost makes me weep when I see you with them”.

6:22 Correspondent:

  • “Michael didn’t learn till after the documentary was made that Martin Bashir had been officially reprimanded in Britain for unfair journalistic practices”.
This was said on air:

This was said on air: “They are restricted.. they are overly protected. I was angry at the way his children were made to suffer”.

6:32 On Late Night Jimmy Fallon February 24, 2011:

  • Q.“Is there things that you left out, things you are unhappy you did?”
  • Bashir: “Absolutely not.  It was difficult I guess to some extent because I come from Britain where we don’t do sycophantic interviews, we don’t really suck up to people very much and do that kind of thing”.
And this was said in private again: "Your relations with children are spectacular"

And this was not: “Your relations with children are spectacular”

6:49 After Michael Jackson’s death on June 25,2009:

  • Bashir: “When I made the documentary there was a small part of that which contained a controversy concerning his relationship with other young people, but the truth is that he was never convicted of any crime, I never saw any wrongdoing myself, and last his lifestyle made him a little unorthodox – I don’t believe this is criminal”.
With words like these said in private only Bashir was winning Michael's trust:

With words like these said in private Bashir was winning Michael’s trust: “And in fact, it almost makes me weep when I see you with them.”

7:08 Some reporters were playing a tabloid relay while Jackson was fighting for his life – and for justice in court.

7:16 Voice of Nancy Grace on “Odds of Molestation conviction of Michael Jackson”:

  • “Las Vegas, the place is up for grabs tonight odds to the one that Jackson will be convicted in one to five counts”.

7: 30 [CNN Headline News & Court TV]

  • “Welcome back, everybody. I’m Ms. Grace….. Thank you for being with us tonight” [slowly covering her face with a sequined glove]

7:39 Some reporters stir up people’s emotions for ratings or call themselves experts using innuendo with a line “sources tell me” to plant suggestion and peek interest. They dehumanize before they dismember the celebrity they target. What was all that fuss about the mask, his skin color, umbrella?

[pictures of Gloria Allred, Victor Gutierrez, Diane Dimond, Jane Velez Mitchell, Martin Bashir, Maureen Orth]

8:00 Diane Sawyer:

  • “We thought they were eccentricities. Could this in fact be a personal style that evolved to disguise a serious disease?”

8:07 Michael had Lupus, a lung disease and Vitiligo. He didn’t bleach his skin. Vitiligo destroyed the pigment.

8:15 The doctor on the ABC News, the “Michael Jackson battle with lupus” program:

  • “Many patients with Lupus have Vitiligo”

8:18 Actress Cicely Tyson, July 7, 2009:

  • “It started to develop… the vitiligo.. And it started on his hand. And the glove was to camouflage it. That is how the glove came into being”.

8:23 Diane Sawyer’s program:

  • Doctor: “Quite a few of my patients have fibromyalgia. He may have suffered from that. Very common to be an insomniac.”
  • Diane Sawyer: “One thing for a lupus patient – don’t let the sun on your skin”
  • Doctor: “That’s right. “

8: 33 The mask kept paparazzi stalking Michael from splashing unflattering pictures and headlines in tabloids the next morning. And their obsession about paternity – what was really behind those stories about race and having children? Was it thinly veiled racism?

8:51 Diane Dimond:

  • “Well, one glimpse at Michael Jackson will show you that he doesn’t really look like an African American man any more.”

Diane Dimond on “Insider”:

  • I think the Jackson family is all about this [gesture denoting money]. I think that’s why they’ll fight for the children because where the children go that’s where the money goes….

9:05 [voice of Diane Dimond on Howard Stern’s show]:

Diane Dimond: "I keep reporting about this"

Diane Dimond: “I keep reporting that”

  • Who is the real baby daddy of at least the first two kids? These kids are not biologically related to Michael Jackson!”
  • [Howard Stern: “They are not”]
  • “And I keep reporting that and the fans keep saying: “No, no, they are. They are his… No, they are not.”
  • [Howard Stern: “No, they are not”].
  • “Get a clue”

9:22 Another voice:

  • “I guess biracial children could look different. They’ll be whiter or darker. And they can be sort of all one or all other…”

[Pictures of other African-Americans:  Lena Horne, Mariah Carey, Jolene Ivey, Jax and Jaid Nilon, Rashida Jones]

Joe and Paris Jackson with their light eyes

Joe and Paris Jackson

Diane Dimond:

  • “Blue eyes? Not so much”.

9:35 And questioning paternity or skin color only insults families who adopt or use fertility procedures to have children.

9:43 Diane Dimond:

  • “It is Michael Jackson, and he lives… he lives to be strange”. He is in free fall now, and we all stay glued to the set till we see the splat” [her hands make a slapping sound].
  • “I think this was Michael Jackson’s destiny to die this way”.

10:08 Here are some of the people Michael counted among his friends – Caroline Kennedy, Ted Kennedy and Shirley McClain, Jacky Kennedy, Ronald and Nancy Reagan, President Bush, President Carter, President Clinton, Nelson Mandela, Princess Diana, Prince Albert of Monaco, Princess Stephany of Monaco, the Dalai Lama, Amon Ndoufou of Sanai (Ghana Ivory Coast), President of Namibie Sam Nujoma…

Michael was a cheer-leader for humanity. He always said he believed in us, said “We are the world”, and that together we could heal many of humanity’s  challenges.

10:37 How do you heal the world according to Michael? His lyrics tell us how. You ask people to stop fighting, lay down their weapons, hear the Earth song and become her stewards, and save the children.

10:58 Michael Jackson was a person who championed children, not harmed them, that’s why he was exonerated by the law. He was found not guilty because he was innocent. Always has been.

Thomas Mesereu: "The reporting hit the bottom of the barrel"

Thomas Mesereu: “The reporting hit the bottom of the barrel”

11: 14 Thomas Mesereau:

  • “I’ve said many times since the verdicts that the reporting hit the bottom of the barrel. Not with everybody. We had very professional journalists who I still call journalists…
  • But we also had bottom feeders like Court TV. Diane Dimond from Court TV had been sued by Michael Jackson in the mid of his very contentious litigation. Thomas Sneddon the D.A. had risen to her defense – he signed a sworn declaration in the civil case. They stayed in touch for a long time. She really identified herself with a conviction and all her media were.
  • She was reporting like Lisa Bloom, the daughter of Gloria Allread who constantly reports Michael Jackson and tries to get involved in anything he does even when she has no stake in the matter. And of course Nancy Grace was the third one on that show. They wanted to create daily drama, daily conflict, daily excitement and that’s never going to change. Their priorities are ratings and money, and they will do whatever it takes to obtain those priorities”.

12:06 Ever asked yourself why we never heard about Michael Jackson from the people who actually knew him? Why didn’t the media tell us about Michael the man?

12:18 Ron Magill, keeper of Miami Zoo:

Ron Magill: "I've never had a nicer

Ron Magill: “I’ve never had a nicer gentleman, a more appreciative person with more well-behaved kids come to the Zoo”

  • “I’ve never had a nicer gentleman, a more appreciative person with more well-behaved kids come to the Zoo.”
  • Q. “Not what you expected?”
  • Ron: “Absolutely not what I expected. And I hosted a lot of celebrities here at the Zoo. And quite frankly, many of them are not pleasant people to be around… He was the absolute opposite.”

12:35 Frank Dileo, Michael’s manager during the Bad era:

  • “We were in Europe and we were doing the Bad tour. Every city we went to we went to a children’s hospital and bought them a piece of equipment. Not one hospital for the whole tour – every city. There was a boy that was dying and wanted to meet Michael. And Michael would talk to him and the kid perked up and he was like amazing and I went off into the corner and I cried. I really couldn’t take it. Michael came over and put his arm around me and said: “You have to understand, Frank – this is our job. Not on the stage – this is our job. To make somebody feel good. He believed that. He absolutely believed that. “

13:20 Teddy Riley:

  • “My daughter stayed with him and has so much fun… He is just such a fun guy”.

13:26  Whoopy Goldberg:

  • “Would you leave your children [with Michael Jackson]?  “Yes, I would” (nodding her head). “Yes, I did. I left my child with Michael, yes….”

13:32 Voice of Brooke Shields:

  • “So many people really don’t know him and they don’t give him a chance and they are so ready to criticize”

13:36 Kenny Ortega:

  • “I was with Michael in Eastern Europe and we got off of the plane and he said “Do you want to go to the hotel and do you come to an orphanage with me?” Rather than going to a hotel he went to the orphanage. And he walked into this orphanage and I remember him looking and he was walking around and he was very calm. The promoters were there and they were looking around. And the conditions were pretty grim and I saw him whisper to someone and whisper to someone else and he was, you know, moving through and interacting with the children… And later I found out  what he’d whispered was: “This orphanage will be turned around – there will be new beds in here, there will be clean sheets in here,  there will be more people here taking care of these children by tomorrow or I am not going to go on stage”.

14:16 Susan Yu, Michael’s former attorney:

  • “Michael was perhaps one of the best client’s I’ve had. He is generous, he is kind, he is grateful. He thanks you for all the work you do every day…”

14:24 Bruce Sweden, engineer/music producer:

  • “He had a very wonderful human side to him too. He was polite and gentle, and in a business where we didn’t hear these words too often Michael, if he would ask for something during the session he’s say “Please”. Such a great guy!

14:40 Madonna at MTV Video Music Awards 2009:

  • “He seemed other worldly but he was also a human being. .. I know what it’s like to walk down the street and feel like the whole world is turned against you. I know what it’s like to feel helpless and unable to defend yourself because the roar of the lynch mob is so loud you feel like your voice can never be heard.
  • [When I first heard that Michael had died.. all I could think about in this moment was] “I had abandoned him.” That we had abandoned him. That we had allowed this magnificent creature who had once set the world on fire to somehow slip through the cracks. [While he was trying to build a family and rebuild his career, we were all passing judgment. Most of us had turned our backs on him]. …He was so unique, so original, so rare, and there will never be anyone like him again. He was a king.”

15:23 Michael used his fame and his platform not just to improve orphanages, but to teach children and to take on social issues – gang violence [Beat it], tabloid corruption [Scream], poverty [We are the world], racism [Black or White], stewardship for the planet [Earth song] and even war [Heal the world].

15:42 Michael Jackson:

I said I am not

Michael about Bella Fracas, a Hungarian child needing a liver transplant: “I am not giving up. I’m not going to have the child die”

  • “This is Lisa Marie and myself at a hospital in Budapest. I saw this little kid. His name was Farkas. I asked this nurse “What’s wrong with this kid?” She said that he needs the liver. No matter what it takes I’m going to find a liver for him, so I said [about my] organization around the world and I said “I’m not giving up. I’m not going to have the child die.”
  • I was so happy when I get a phone call. They told me “We found the liver”. And he has his life…

16:12 Maybe it’s time we take another look at Michael Jackson to find out what really happened. We are also busy trying to shelter our children from the bullies of the world wringing our hands in worry and fear. Yet, we missed the biggest case of bullying the world had ever seen.

[Pictures of newspaper covers: “Buy a slice of Wacko Jackso”,  “Jacko gets a wacko”, “Jim Jam Wacko”, “Sicko Jacko”, etc.]

16: 32 Michael Jackson is the poster boy. He endured years of torture on a global stage with the whole world watching. And the children? They loved Michael and they were watching. They are watching now. What kind of world do we want to hand off to our children?

16:51 Michael asked us to heal the world and save it for our children. He was on his way back to remind us – we are the world. And he died trying…

17:06 Michael Jackson at Exeter, UK, June 14th, 2002:

  • “Sadly, sadly, we live in a state of fear. Everyday we hear of war on the news, on the radio and television and the newspapers, always of war. We hear of nations hurting each other, of neighbours hurting each other, of families hurting each other and the children killing each other. We must learn to live and love each other before it’s too late. We have to stop! We have to stop the prejudice, we have to stop the hating, we have to stop living in fear of our own neighbors. I would like all of you now to take the hand of the person to the left and to the right. Go ahead! Right now! I mean it! Don’t be shy! Do it! It starts now! To the person next to you. To the left and the right. I mean it. Right now! Go ahead! Don’t be shy. Do it! Do it! Now, tell the person … tell the person next to you that you care for them. Tell them that you care for them. Tell them that you love them. Tell them that you love them. This is what makes the difference.
  • Together … (Michael laughs) together we can make a change of the world. Together we can help to stop racism. Together we can help to stop prejudice. We can help the world live without fear. It’s our only hope, without hope we are lost.”
Paris Jackson: "You were the best daddy

Paris Jackson: “Daddy has been the best father you can ever imagine… I just wanted to say… I love him so much…”

19:10 Paris Jackson:

  • “Ever since I was born daddy has been the best father you can ever imagine….. I just wanted to say I love him…. so much…”

19:32 Ron Magill:

  • “I looked at it myself and said, “Michael, I have to be honest with you. If more people saw this side of you I don’t think you’d have the type of controversy that you face all the time and his answer will stick with me as long as I live, as he took my hand, shook it hard and said, “The problem is no one will ever know what it’s like to have to be me.”  And I thought he’s going to cry. He really had that look on his face, and it really taught me a lesson – don’t prejudge someone by what you are listening to in the media”.

MAN BEHIND THE MYTH VIDEO

LEARNING FROM HIM

Each of us has a lesson to derive for himself from Michael’s tragic life full of bullying and harassment, and everyone has his own reason why he would want Michael back – to make up for our mistakes, to cry on his shoulder in utter shame for what we did,  to tell him how we love him now

But one of my own biggest wishes would be to have him around to tell us, explain and teach us what love is. The years of following his troubles and struggling with lies and hate against him have taught me that love is pain, tears and a bleeding heart, but what else is it?

Is it discarding one’s ego and sharing the best you have with others? Oh yes, it is.

It is accepting each person the way he is? Probably yes, but this I find hard to apply to everyone, especially in the circumstances of this trial and so many lies told there by too many people.

Can love be fighting some of these people in order to clear the air of their lies, arrogance and hypocrisy? I think it can. But is it also hoping that those who are doing so much harm now will one day abandon their ways? Probably it is too….

Does love mean forgiving each other faults, not passing the final judgment and acknowledging that none of us are without guilt? And forgiving those who say that they are really sorry? For sure it does. But what about those who are spreading lies on purpose and derive pleasure from fooling others? How is it possible to love these people? This I don’t know…

And what are we to do with those who are perfectly comfortable with their lies or illusions, are unwilling to seek for the truth or recognize it even when it is glaring in their faces? Because this way it is easier for them or the old habit never to reflect  is also standing in the way? Does loving these people mean fighting their ignorance and separating the human beings they are from their weaknesses? Probably it does…

Or is love not overcomplicating matters and simply appealing to the best in each person as Michael did? And hoping that the good in them will get the upper hand over their worst side one day? Never bringing anyone into the corner and always leaving the room for the doubt?  Sage and MJ 12This is what Michael always did as he gave it a try with everyone around him and sometimes it did work, though in most cases it didn’t and only let him down and finally brought about his death.

I really don’t know what love is. Can anyone tell me?

What I know for sure though is that after Michael’s death it is simply impossible to live the way we lived before. And the Man Behind The Myth film explains it best of all. If we don’t learn at least a little bit from what happened it will mean that Michael lived and died in vain. And this is something we absolutely cannot afford.


Filed under: LOVE SURVIVES, The MEDIA, The SOCIETY Tagged: Diane Dimond, Martin Bashir, Michael Jackson, Sage, Thomas Mesereau

Jacksons vs AEG trial. BRIAN PANISH’S CLOSING ARGUMENTS

$
0
0
Judge Yvette Palazuelos

Judge Yvette Palazuelos

BREAKING NEWS:  

The judge allowed cameras in the court room to show the closing arguments of both sides in the case!

ABC7 says:

“Closing arguments in the Michael Jackson wrongful death trial begin Tuesday, Sept. 24, 2013.

AEG is accused of negligently hiring Dr. Conrad Murray, who was convicted in 2011 of giving Michael Jackson a lethal dose of propofol, which led to his death. If jurors find that it was AEG that hired the doctor, they must also decide whether AEG was negligent in hiring Murray, and whether the concert promoter knew he was incompetent.

Mr. Panish: "Everyone knew there was a problem"

Mr. Panish: “Everyone knew there was a problem”

The trial has lasted nearly five months. Jurors have heard from more than 30 witnesses. Once the closing arguments are completed, jurors can begin deliberating as early as Thursday.”

The first to speak is Mr. Panish of the Plaintiffs.

ABC is livestreaming his closing arguments:

http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/livenow?id=9259817

LA Times is also streaming. They say that it works best on slow connections:

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-ln-watch-it-live-closing-arguments-michael-jackson-trial-20130924,0,5334210.story?track=rss

CNN is streaming too:

http://edition.cnn.com/video/data/2.0/video/cvplive/cvpstream2.html

HLN is live-blogging the closing arguments and provides some of the highlights here:

http://www.hlntv.com/article/2013/09/24/michael-jackson-aeg-live-trial-closing-arguments

The AEG lawyers are listening to Mr. Panish

The AEG lawyers are listening to Mr. Panish

The comments on the HLN website are horrendous.  It is time Michael Jackson’s supporters had their say there too!

Live blog: Who’s responsible for MJ’s death?

By Amanda Sloane
Tue September 24, 2013

HLN is live-blogging closing arguments. Read below for minute-by-minute updates from the trial (best read from the bottom up):

6:36 p.m. ET: Panish is now detailing the non-monetary loss Jackson’s children have suffered from his death.

6:33 p.m. ET: Jackson wrote poetry for his mother.

6:29 p.m. ET: This is a picture of the Jackson family home in Gary, Indiana.

6:27 p.m. ET: Panish is showing the jury some pictures of Jackson with his family.

6:25 p.m. ET: ”Death lasts forever,” said Panish. “This will never be replaced.”

6:23 p.m. ET: Panish is now discussing how the Jackson family has suffered loss besides monetary losses. He is explaining that Jackson family will no longer feel MJ’s love or comfort.

6:19 p.m. ET: Panish has picked back up with his closing argument. He says AEG wanted Jackson to perform, because his tour was going to make a large profit. He also says Jackson invested in his family.

5:57 p.m. ET: The video is over, and Panish said the video of past performances was the best evidence that Jackson could have still sold out shows if he had lived. Court is now in a 15 minute break.

5:52 p.m. ET: The video of past performances has been playing for more than 10 minutes now.

5:48 p.m. ET: The video also showed Jackson’s first moonwalk at the 25th Anniversary of the Grammy’s.

5:42 p.m. ET: The video of past performances shows Jackson performing with the Jackson 5 as a child, and also shows him performing to sold out crowds as an adult.

5:38 p.m. ET: Panish is playing a video of Jackson’s performances for the jury so they can see he could have still earned a substantial amount of money if he lived.

5:36 p.m. ET: AEG’s own accounting figures indicate that Jackson was going to earn close to $1.5 billion on his final tour.

5:34 p.m. ET: Panish just played a clip from “This is it” with Kenny Ortega saying that Jackson could have sold out 200 shows on his final tour.

5:31 p.m. ET: Panish said Katherine Jackson should awarded less money that his children, because her life expectancy is much shorter.

5:27 p.m. ET: When deciding how much to award Katherine Jackson and Michael’s kids, Panish tells jurors they have to use common sense to decide “what is just and fair.”

5:25 p.m. ET: ”Unfortunately nothing can bring Michael Jackson back… in our society there’s a tremendous value placed on human life,” said Panish. He has started talking about Jackson’s mom, Katherine, saying there is no word for a parent who has lost a child because it’s “an indescribable loss that no parent should ever experience.”

5:22 p.m. ET: Panish is moving on to the next set of questions, which address compensatory damages.

5:19 p.m. ET: A timeline of Jackson’s medical treatments is displayed  on a slide. Panish says Jackson survived 50 years of procedures with “never a single issue.” He says the one thing that changed was AEG and Murray.

5:16 p.m. ET: Panish tells jurors they don’t need to spend much time on question #4 and moves on to question #5: “Was AEG Live’s negligence in hiring, supervising, or retaining Dr. Conrad Murray a substantial factor in causing Michael Jackson and the Jackson Plaintiffs’ harm?”

5:15 p.m. ET: Panish moves on to question #4, saying the answer is “obviously” yes: “Did Dr. Conrad Murray’s unfitness or incompetence harm Michael Jackson and the Jackson Plaintiffs?”

5:10 p.m. ET: Jackson was described by a witness earlier in the trial as “very, very underweight… like someone who was at the end stage of a — of a long disease process.”

5:04 p.m. ET: One AEG employee [Michael Bush] said Jackson was so thin, he could see his heart beating in his chest. Another employee expressed fears Jackson was going to die and needed to be hospitalized, according to Panish.

5:01 p.m. ET: The director of Jackson’s show e-mailed AEG executives, telling them Jackson was in trouble and needed a mental evaluation, according to Panish.

4:59 p.m. ET: E-mails Panish reads in court show there were concerns about “trouble at the front” when it came to Jackson’s health and his tour.

4:56 p.m. ET: The director of the show, Kenny Ortega, was supposed to monitor Jackson’s health, according to Panish. “The pressure was on,” said Panish. Jackson and Ortega then put the pressure on Murray, according to Panish.

4:52 p.m. ET: Panish says everyone knew Jackson had problems sleeping and needed help to treat his insomnia.

4:48 p.m. ET: Testimony from earlier in the trial continues to be played by Panish.

4:41 p.m. ET: Panish warns the courtroom not to laugh as he replays testimony by a few AEG executives who are edited together to say “I don’t know” or “I don’t remember” several times.

4:38 p.m. ET: Jackson family attorney Brian Panish has continued working his way through the jury verdict form, addressing question #3: “Did AEG Live know or should it have known that Dr. Conrad Murray was unfit or incompetent and that this unfitness or incompetence created a particular risk to others?”

4:36 p.m. ET: Court is now in session.

4:32 p.m. ET: Closing arguments should begin again any minute now.

2:59 p.m. ET: The judge has recessed the court for lunch. Closing arguments will resume at 4:30 p.m. ET.

2:57 p.m. ET: ”It’s not a stretch that he was unfit and incompetent — come on,” Panish said, in reference to Murray.

2:55 p.m. ET: A detective working for the LAPD was easily able to determine Murray was financially “a mess,” which was a motivation for what he did, according to Panish.

2:52 p.m. ET: Conrad Murray asking for $5 million to go on tour was a red flag showing he was “unfit, incompetent and outrageous,” according to Panish.

2:50 p.m. ET: Panish says AEG Live wanted complete control over Murray and that some people do things they normally wouldn’t do because of a need for money.

2:47 p.m. ET: Video being played in court shows AEG executive Paul Gongaware being asked about the e-mail he sent (mentioned in previous entry). He says he doesn’t member sending it or what it means. “We weren’t paying his salary,” Gongaware said. He then says he doesn’t know whose salary he’s even talking about.

“It would be funny, but for somebody who has lost his life… I don’t think it’s funny,” Panish said.

2:42 p.m. ET: Panish shows this e-mail to the jury, sent between AEG execs: “We want to remind him that it is AEG, not MJ who is paying his salary.”

2:40 p.m. ET: Panish says Murray swore to do no harm but did it anyway: “Why did he do it? For the money.”

2:39 p.m. ET: “Was Dr. Murray swayed by the conflict of the money vs. the patient?” asked Panish.

2:36 p.m. ET: Murray had two obligations: One to the entity paying him money (AEG) and one to his patient (Jackson), according to Panish.

2:27 p.m. ET: Panish moves on to the second question on the verdict form: “Was Dr. Conrad Murray unfit or incompetent to perform the work for which he was hired?” Panish says it’s obvious Murray is unfit and incompetent because he killed the King of Pop and wasn’t trained to treat insomnia.

2:22 p.m. ET: Panish says Murray was included on AEG Live budgets.

2:19 p.m. ET: Why would AEG let Murray have control over Jackson’s rehearsal schedule if he wasn’t hired by them, asks Panish.

2:13 p.m. ET: Panish is showing e-mails between AEG Live and Murray that he says prove they had a contract.

2:04 p.m. ET: Panish is still going over the first jury question: “Did AEG Live hire Dr. Conrad Murray?” He says a contract can be written or oral, partially written or partially oral and that oral contracts are just as valid as written contracts.

1:58 p.m. ET: On the issue of whether AEG Live hired Dr. Murray, Panish says the evidence overwhelming shows that they did.

1:55 p.m. ET: “If the scale [of justice] tips ever so slightly, we have met the burden of proof,” said Panish, who must show AEG Live negligently hired, supervised or retained Dr. Murray.

1:53 p.m. ET: Panish is walking jurors through what needs to be proven in this case and who has the burden of proof.

1:51 p.m. ET: Dr. Murray broke his Hippocratic oath and AEG Live is responsible, according to Panish.

1:47 p.m. ET: An AEG exec had to throw Jackson in a shower and slap him before the press conference that announced his “This Is It” tour, according to Panish. Executives exchanged e-mails after saying, “We can’t back off now, it would be a disaster for the company.”

1:45 p.m. ET: Panish says AEG wanted Jackson to perform so badly “they would do whatever it took to get him on stage and they told that to Dr. Murray.”

1:42 p.m. ET: “He had abused prescription medications during times of pain, anxiety, stress,” said Panish.

1:39 p.m. ET: “The whole world stopped when the King of Pop died and everyone grieved,” said Panish.

1:37 p.m. ET: Panish says Michael Jackson “danced, walked, moon walked on this earth for nearly 50 years… someone like that only comes around every so often. We may never see the likes of Michael Jackson ever again… That gift came at a huge price.”

1:34 p.m. ET: Jackson family attorney Brian Panish begins his closing argument by thanking the jury for its service. Jurors have been listening to this case for five months.

1:24 p.m. ET: Katherine Jackson and daughter Rebbie have entered the courtroom. Grandchildren Taj and TJ Jackson (the sons of Tito) are now sitting with their grandmother.

* * *

Here is the first Youtube report  covering the event:

Alan Duke:

  • “The first question the jurors have to decide is if AEG Live actually had a contractual agreement, a hiring arrangement with Dr. Murray? They say there are three ways that they did. One is an oral contract. Two …  [illegible] and three is there was a written contract. Did they hire him and was it negligent?”

Lawyer for Michael Jackson’s family: AEG must pay for pop star’s death

Jackson trialBrian Panish, attorney for Michael Jackson’s family, delivers his closing argument to jurors in a packed courtroom in downtown Los Angeles. (AL Seib / Los Angeles Times / September 24, 2013)

By Jeff Gottlieb

September 24, 2013, 1:29 p.m.

Quoting from Abraham Lincoln, the Book of Exodus and internal emails from AEG Live, an attorney for Michael Jackson’s family told jurors Tuesday that the concert promoter hired the doctor who gave Jackson a fatal dose of a powerful anesthetic and now should have to pay for the pop star’s death.

After pointing out that AEG put Dr. Conrad Murray in charge of Jackson’s rehearsal schedule, attorney Brian Panish said, “Why would a doctor you haven’t hired be responsible for someone working for you to go to practice or rehearsal? Why? Because you hired him, that’s why.”

Panish tried to educate jurors, explaining that unlike in a criminal trial they needed only to find that their claims were more likely true than not for them to find in favor of Michael Jackson’s mother and three children.

The Jacksons have sued AEG for Jackson’s death, saying the entertainment firm negligently hired and supervised Murray. AEG maintains that the doctor worked for Jackson and any money the firm was supposed to pay the doctor was an advance to the singer.

Panish explained that Murray did not need a written agreement to have a valid contract, that an oral agreement was just as good.

After not allowing TV cameras in court during the nearly five-month trial, Judge Yvette Palazuelos reversed herself Tuesday. The closing statements already had been moved to a much larger courtroom to accommodate the media crush and a growing number of spectators.

Panish, speaking in a much calmer tone than he used during testimony, tried to turn the words of AEG executives against them, as he had during much of the trial. Panish will finish his closing statement Tuesday afternoon, and attorneys for AEG will have their turn Wednesday.

Panish quoted experts who said that when Murray closed his Las Vegas practice to take on Jackson as his only patient, asking at first for $5 million, the sum should have immediately raised red flags.

Murray, who was in dire financial straits, eventually agreed to compensation of $150,000 month, circumstances that experts testified created a conflict between his money needs and his patient’s care.

Who is this guy the camera is constantly showing?

Who is this guy the camera is constantly showing?

Panish showed a television interview of AEG Live Chief Executive Randy Phillips, filmed before the lawsuit was filed, talking about Murray.

“The guy’s willing to leave his practice for a very large sum of money, so we hired him,” Phillips says in the interview.

“It’s real simple,” Panish said. “He’s the CEO of the company, as high as it gets. He admitted it.”

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-aeg-michael-jackson-death-20130924,0,1495878.story


Filed under: AEG THE HORRIBLE, Jacksons vs. AEG Tagged: AEG, Brian Panish, Conrad Murray, Katherine Jackson, Michael Jackson

Jacksons vs AEG trial. MARVIN PUTNAM’S CLOSING ARGUMENTS

$
0
0
Marvin Putnam is a very lively thing

Marvin Putnam: “AEG did not have a crystal ball’

Before the AEG’s lawyers closing arguments to start soon here is an article by Alan Duke on this being the last chance for AEG:

AEG Live to get its last chance to argue in Michael Jackson wrongful death trial

By Alan Duke, CNN

September 25, 2013 — Updated 1549 GMT (2349 HKT)

Los Angeles (CNN) – Michael Jackson’s last concert promoter has four hours Wednesday to convince a jury that it is not responsible for the pop icon’s death.

AEG Live attorney Marvin Putnam warned in his opening statements in the Jackson wrongful death trial five months ago that he would show “ugly stuff” and reveal Jackson’s “deepest, darkest secret.”

The revelations that jurors heard from 58 witnesses over 83 days of testimony over 21 weeks included details of Jackson’s drug use and his shopping for a doctor to give him the surgical anesthetic propofol that he thought would give him sleep.

Brian Panish, the lead lawyer for Jackson’s mother and three children, conceded in his closing Tuesday that the singer may have some fault for his own death, but said “it’s about shared responsibility.”

Jackson did use prescription painkillers and was warned that using propofol at home to sleep was risky, “but he never had a problem until Dr. Conrad Murray was working and until Conrad Murray negotiated with AEG Live,” Panish argued.

He urged jurors to award the family between $1 billion and $2 billion in damages for its share of liability in Jackson’s death — to replace what he would have earned touring, had he lived, and for the personal suffering from the loss of a son and father.

Katherine Jackson testified that she filed the wrongful death lawsuit three years ago against AEG Live “because I want to know what really happened to my son.”

Her lawyers argue that the company is liable in the death because it negligently hired, retained or supervised Murray, who was convicted of involuntary manslaughter in Jackson’s propofol overdose death.

After AEG Live’s Putnam delivers his closing arguments Wednesday, Jackson’s lawyer will have another two hours Thursday morning to sum up his arguments in rebuttal.

Twelve jurors, who have sat and listened in a Los Angeles courtroom for 21 weeks, will then begin deliberations.

The judge is allowing a television camera in court for the closing arguments and verdict.

AEG Live’s defense

Murray treated Michael Jackson and his children for minor illnesses while they lived in Las Vegas for three years, before the singer returned to Los Angeles to prepare for his “This Is It” comeback tour. It was Jackson — not AEG Live executives — who chose Murray to be his full-time doctor for his tour, the company’s lawyers contend.

AEG Live Co-CEO Paul Gongaware negotiated to pay Murray $150,000 a month only because of Jackson’s request to have his doctor with him as he performed 50 shows at London’s O2 Arena, they argue.

There was no need to check Murray’s background because he was a licensed, successful doctor who was known to Jackson, they said.

A key argument in the Jackson case is that AEG Live was negligent by not ordering a financial background check of Murray, which would have revealed he was in a dire financial situation and not successful. His desperation to keep his lucrative job led Murray to violate his Hippocratic Oath to do no harm by using the dangerous propofol infusions to put Jackson to sleep each night for two months, Jackson lawyers argue.

AEG Live executives had no way of knowing Murray was treating Jackson’s insomnia with propofol in the privacy of his bedroom, their lawyers contend. Jackson was a secretive addict, adept at keeping family, friends and other doctors in the dark about his medical treatments, they argue.

But two doctors testified that they told Gongaware about Jackson’s abuse of painkillers and his insomnia during tours in the 1990s, when the AEG Live executive served as tour manager. Jackson lawyers argue Gongaware, who was the top producer on the new tour, should have known that Jackson could suffer the same problems in 2009.

AEG Live can avoid a negative verdict if they are able to convince at least four of the 12 jurors that they did not hire Murray. It is the first of 16 questions on the jury verdict form. If jurors answer it with a “no” — that AEG Live did not hire the doctor — they would end their deliberations and the trial.

An AEG Live lawyer e-mailed an employment contract to Murray on the morning of June 24, 2009. Murray signed it and faxed it back to the company that day. But the signature line for AEG Live’s CEO and Michael Jackson were never signed since Jackson died the next day.

Putnam will point to those blank signature lines as evidence that Murray was never hired by his client. There were negotiations with Murray, but he was never paid, the AEG Live lawyer argues.

Panish, the lead Jackson lawyer, told jurors Tuesday that all the elements of an oral contract — “just as valid as a written contract” — were in place when Jackson died.

Murray had been treating Jackson for two month and the written contract stated that his start day was May 1, 2009. A series of e-mail exchanges involving Murray and AEG Live executives and lawyers supported his argument, Panish said.

Blame and damages

If the jury concludes AEG Live has liability, it would have to decide how much the company should pay in economic and personal damages to Jackson’s mother and children. They can use estimates of Jackson’s “lost earnings capacity” — the amount of money he could reasonably be expected to have earned if he had lived — to guide them.

AEG Live expert Eric Briggs testified it was “speculative” that Jackson would have even completed another tour because of his drug use, damaged reputation and history of failed projects. He suggested the star may never have earned another dime.

Putnam’s closing argument about damages must overcome the impression left on jurors Tuesday when Panish played a video montage of Jackson performances.

“That is, I think, the best evidence of if Michael Jackson could have sold tickets — not what Mr. Briggs would tell you,” Panish told jurors.

Panish suggested jurors pick a number between $900 million and $1.6 billion for economic damages. They should add on another $290 million for non-economic damages — or personal damages, he said.

The last question on the verdict form asks jurors to assign a percentage that they believe represents Michael Jackson’s share of blame in his death. The total damages owed by AEG Live would be reduced by that percentage.

Marvin Putnam, when he concludes Wednesday, could be expected to argue Michael Jackson is 100% to blame.

Panish will have another two hours to rebut Putnam’s arguments before jury deliberations begin Thursday.

http://edition.cnn.com/2013/09/25/showbiz/michael-jackson-death-trial/?hpt=en_c1

Well, whatever AEG has to say it turns out that they were terribly unwilling to have the closing arguments heard at a bigger venue with more journalists and public present, and have the final days of the trial televised.

The proof of is a brief filed by AEG on September 18, 2013 saying that :

  • in prohibiting cameras in the courtroom during trial, this Court rightly acknowledged that heightened media presence, including cameras in the courtroom, could have a serious detrimental effect on the parties’ ability to receive a fair trial…

http://amradaronline.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/jacksonhearingdocsb.pdf

  • defendants respectfully request that the Court permit the proceedings to remain in Department 28 for the duration of trial…

brief not to televise

The above makes it clear that from the very start of he trial it was the AEG side that was interested in minimizing the public and media attendance of the trial proceedings and people never seeing with their own eyes what’s going on in the courtroom.

*   *  *

It seems that the AEG closing arguments have started rather long ago today and it’s only me who caught up with them just now (sorry for that).

ABC is live streaming Marvin Putnam’s theatrical performance: http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/livenow?id=9259817

Here it is on CNNhttp://edition.cnn.com/video/data/2.0/video/cvplive/cvpstream2.html

HLN is live-blogging again under the telling title of “MJ’s dirty secrets come out in trial”:

Live blog: MJ’s dirty secrets come out in trial

By Graham Winch and Amanda Sloane
updated 5:01 PM EDT, Wed September 25, 2013

HLN is live-blogging the closing arguments in the Michael Jackson wrongful death trial. Minute-by-minute updates can be found under this story.

LIE: "Mr. Jackson a whole team of advisors!'

LIE: “Mr. Jackson had a whole team of advisors” TRUTH: Randy Phillips said MJ didn’t have a manager, didn’t have a lawyer, didn’t have anyone to talk to. “It was a nightmare” according to Phillips

Attorneys for AEG Live aired Michael Jackson’s dirty laundry in court Wednesday, claiming that the superstar’s years-long drug addiction is what ultimately killed him.

“Mr. Jackson spent decades shopping for doctors to give him the painkillers he wanted,” said AEG Live attorney Marvin Putnam during his closing argument. “He manipulated and he lied to those doctors so he could get double doses.”

As closing arguments stretched into their second day, AEG attorneys got their final chance to tell jurors why they shouldn’t have to hand over more than $1 billion to Jackson’s family.

The pop icon’s mother and three children say the concert promoter is responsible for negligently hiring, retaining or supervising Dr. Conrad Murray, the man found guilty in 2011 of involuntary manslaughter in Jackson’s death.

 LIE: "Kathy Jorrie checked Dr. Murray" [she googled him for 10 min on the Internet]


LIE: “Kathy Jorrie checked out Dr. Murray” TRUTH: She googled him for 10 min on the Internet

But AEG Live says it was Jackson who insisted on having Murray on his “This Is It Tour” and that he was solely responsible for paying the doctor, who admitted to giving Jackson the drug propofol for 60 days straight to treat his insomnia.
The pop star died on June 25, 2009, from a fatal overdose of the surgical anesthetic.“He had his children – Prince and Paris – give Dr. Murray stacks of hundred dollar bills,” said Putnam, who described how the stacks were secured with rubber bands.
Putnam said that this lawsuit has made it possible for AEG Live to get access to “Jackson’s most personal, most private material,” including financial records that show he was almost half a billion dollars in debt and that the house of his mother, Katherine, was almost in foreclosure.Putnam said all of the responsibility for Jackson’s death rests with him.
"Mr. Phillips just made a mistake in his testimony"

LIE: “Mr. Phillips just made a mistake in his testimony”. TRUTH: Mr.Phillips was impeached more than 40 times which means that, he was caught telling different stories at his deposition and on the stand

“The truth here is a tragedy, make no mistake about that… it’s incredibly sad. But it’s not a tragedy of AEG Live’s making. You can’t point the finger at them and you shouldn’t,” Putnam said.

“Mr. Jackson chose this doctor, years before. And Mr. Jackson chose the drug that killed him. Mr. Jackson, like every adult, is responsible for his own choices.”

On Tuesday, Jackson family attorney Brian Panish asked jurors to award the Jackson family a sum between $1 billion and $2 billion to account for the money he would have made touring had he not died, and also to account for the personal suffering from the loss of a son and father.

LIE: "June 19th was an anomaly" [TRUTH:  the AEG own staff said they saw MJ deteriorating for 8 weeks]

LIE: “June 19th was an anomaly” . TRUTH: AEG’s own staff said they saw MJ deteriorating for 8 weeks. (NOTE: These are samples only. The list of lies can be continued forever,) 

Jackson was scheduled to perform a record-setting 50 concerts in the same venue — the O2 Arena in London.
AEG Live’s lawyers say they never hired Murray and Jackson’s secrecy about his drug use made it impossible for executives to know that Murray posed a danger to the singer as he prepared for his comeback tour.
Jackson was scheduled to perform a record-setting 50 concerts in the same venue — the O2 Arena in London.
HLN is live-blogging closing arguments. Read below for minute-by-minute updates from the trial (best read from the bottom up):

6:57 p.m. ET: Mr. “Jackson was taking propofol long before Dr. Murray,” said Putnam.

6:53 p.m. ET: AEG Live never paid Murray according to Putnam. It seems like Putnam is wrapping up his closing argument.

6:50 p.m. ET: Putnam is explaining to the jurors that if they find Jackson himself was negligent and was a substantial factor in his own death then AEG Live is not liable.

6:40 p.m. ET: Putnam said the amount of damages the Jackson family is asking for is “ridiculous.”

6:37 p.m. ET: “Mr. Jackson was bound and determined to get propofol,” said Putnam. ”Adults are responsible for their own choices.”

6:33 p.m. ET: Putnam said Jackson asked another doctor to administer propofol to him in April 2009 just a few months before he died.

6:28 p.m. ET: ”Adults are responsible for their own choices,” said Putnam for the second time.

6:26 p.m. ET: “Jackson cut uncooperative doctors out his life permanently,” said Putnam.

6:21 p.m. ET: Putnam said multiple doctors refused to give Jackson propofol, because it was such a dangerous drug.

6:18 p.m. ET: Debbie Rowe told Jackson propofol was dangerous, but he did it anyway according to Putnam.

6:16 p.m. ET: ”Adults are responsible for the mistakes they make,” said Putnam.

6:13 p.m. ET: Putnam is detailing Jackson’s history with propofol. Jackson told multiple people that he used it multiple times from different doctors.

6:10 p.m. ET: Putnam has resumed his closing argument for AEG Live.

5:47 p.m. ET: Putnam is playing a video of Jackson singing and dancing 12 hours before he died. Court has now recessed for a 15 minute break.

5:40 p.m. ET: Putnam played another video of Jackson singing two days before his death.

5:37 p.m. ET: The video shows Jackson dancing all over the stage two days before his death.

5:32 p.m. ET: Putnam said Jackson had “incredible” performance in rehearsal just two days before he died. He is now playing a part of “This is It” documentary that shows Jackson’s rehearsal on June 23, 2009. Jackson died June 25, 2009.

5:27 p.m. ET: Representatives with AEG met with Jackson to see if he was okay after he appeared to be sick in June 2009.

“Mr. Jackson a 50 year old man told his business partners that he was fine,” said Putnam.

5:21 p.m. ET: Jackson appeared sick on June 19, but Putnam said nobody knew why he was sick.

5:15 p.m. ET: Putnam just played a video of Jackson rehearsing on June 5 about a week before his death. The video shows that Jackson was healty right up to his death according to Putnam.

5:08 p.m. ET: Putnam showed pictures of Jackson to show that his weight was normal shortly before he died.

5:01 p.m. ET: ”AEG Live believed Jackson was perfectly healthy,” said Putnam. “He was healthy. He was ready to perform.”

4:57 p.m. ET: ”Nothing in Dr. Murray’s background would suggest he might be dangerous,” said Putnam.

4:54 p.m. ET: Putnam said that AEG was not required to supervise AEG.  They were never supposed to supervise him, because they have no medical knowledge.

4:49 p.m. ET: There was nothing that should have notified AEG Live that Dr. Murray was incompetent according to Putnam.

4:45 p.m. ET: Putnam said AEG Live did not know anything about propofol or should have known about the anesthetic being administered to Jackson and thus should not be held liable.

4:41 p.m. ET: Putnam has resumed his closing argument. He says Jackson’s attorneys didn’t proved that AEG Live knew or should have known that Dr. Murry posed a risk to Jackson.

2:58 p.m. ET: The judge has recessed court for lunch until 4:30 p.m. ET.

2:56 p.m. ET: “Mr. Jackson thought enough of Dr. Murray to let him provide medical treatment to his own children,” said Putnam. AEG didn’t know Murray was treating Jackson with propofol “behind his locked bedroom doors.” If Murray was hired to administer propofol, then he would have been hired by Jackson for this purpose, according to Putnam.

2:55 p.m. ET: As far as AEG Live knew, Murray was a general doctor for Jackson, according to Putnam. If Jackson wanted an anesthesiologist and hired Murray, that would have raised a red flag.

2:50 p.m. ET: Putnam says that, despite this e-mail, AEG Live co-CEO Paul Gongaware never had a conversation with Murray about who was paying him. Gongaware says he doesn’t remember seeing this e-mail or what he meant.

2:42 p.m. ET: Murray and AEG Live agreed there would be no oral agreement, only a signed contract, which never happened, according to Putnam.

2:40 p.m. ET: E-mails sent between Murray and AEG Live prove there was no contract between the two, according to Putnam.

2:37 p.m. ET: Court is back in session and Putnam has resumed his closing argument.

2:14 p.m. ET: The judge has recessed court for 15 minutes.

2:10 p.m. ET: Putnam is showing copies of Murray’s draft agreements.

2:05 p.m. ET: The only reason AEG Live ever spoke to Murray was because Jackson had asked them to advance money to pay the doctor, according to Putnam.

1:58 p.m. ET: AEG was going to loan a broke Jackson money to help pay Murray, according to Putnam. He also says Jackson agreed to be responsible for anyone he brought on the tour with him.

1:54 p.m. ET: Putnam says Jackson always paid Murray — AEG Live didn’t give him any money — and that Jackson would have his kids hand the doctor stacks of hundred dollar bills, wrapped with elastic bands.

1:52 p.m. ET: Jackson introduced Murray as “his doctor” to AEG Live executives, according to Putnam, and he insisted the doctor come on tour and he wouldn’t take no for an answer.

“It was not for AEG Live to interfere with that longtime doctor-patient relationship… Dr. Conrad Murray was Michael Jackson’s choice.”

1:48 p.m. ET: When it comes to who hired Murray, Putnam says there are four options (and all the evidence points to the first): Michal Jackson hired him, AEG Live hired, they both hired him or neither one hired him.

1:47 p.m. ET: Putnam is now addressing question #1 on the jury verdict form: “Did AEG Live hire Dr. Conrad Murray?” He says no because Jackson hired Murray and things “never even got that far” — there wasn’t a contract. “There was never a done deal.”

1:45 p.m. ET: ”You can’t save someone, they have to save themselves. And more importantly… the law doesn’t say you have to,” said Putnam.

1:40 p.m. ET: Michael Jackson’s death “would have happened no matter what — with or without AEG Live,” said Putnam.

1:38 p.m. ET: ”This case is about Dr. Conrad Murray,” says a slide Putnam has displayed. He gives some examples of when an employer is negligent in hiring an employee, such as: If the employer knows the employee has a violent history and is hired to work with weapons.

1:34 p.m. ET: Putnam is starting to go through the jury verdict form and the questions jurors have to answer “yes” to in order to find AEG Live liable.

1:30 p.m. ET: ”The truth here is a tragedy, make no mistake about that… it’s incredibly sad. But it’s not a tragedy of AEG Live’s making. You can’t point the finger at them and you shouldn’t,” said Putnam. “Mr. Jackson chose this doctor, years before. And Mr. Jackson chose the drug that killed him. Mr. Jackson, like every adult, is responsible for his own choices.”

1:29 p.m. ET: ”He was never hired by AEG Live to go on tour. If they hired him, they would have paid him,” Putnam said about Murray. If jurors don’t find that Murray was hired by AEG Live, then they can’t find AEG Live liable for Jackson’s death.

1:25 p.m. ET: “They never told the truth to AEG Live,” Putnam said about Jackson and Murray. “When Michael Jackson’s bedroom was searched, his secrets were revealed.”

Putnam also said AEG Live never would have agreed to finance the tour if it knew Jackson was playing “Russian roulette” every night in his bedroom.

1:22 p.m. ET: Jackson was about half a billion dollars in debt, according to Putnam. Jackson also “spent decades shopping for doctors to give him the pain killers he wanted,” said Putnam.

1:18 p.m. ET: Putnam says AEG Live isn’t responsible for Jackson’s death because “This was a choice Mr. Jackson made, not somebody else. He was a grown man… he is responsible for his own health — certainly his own healthcare. And his is responsible for his own choices, no matter how bad those choices might be.”

Putnam also says AEG Live tried to talk Jackson out of bringing Murray on the tour.

“Mr. Jackson would not take ‘no’ for an answer. If he wanted something, he got it,” said Putnam.

1:14 p.m. ET: AEG Live attorney Marvin Putnam will deliver the closing argument for the defense. He begins by thanking the jurors for their service.

1:11 p.m. ET: The judge is taking the bench.

1:07 p.m. ET: The judge has asked all parties to return to the courtroom at 12:30 p.m. ET Wednesday. The live blog will pick up once closing arguments resume, which should be any minute now.

http://www.hlntv.com/article/2013/09/25/michael-jackson-aeg-wrongful-death-closing-arguments

* * *

MR. PUTNAM’S FARCE IS OVER.

WE NEED A NEW MOLIERE FOR THIS TARTUFFE!

The great TeamMichaelJackson has already posted the first part of Putnam’s  farce. The number of lies in his closing arguments is indescribable. It is a non-stop stream of lies forming a different reality which simply has nothing to do with real life.

But as every lie it is rather entertaining.

If I were to give a name for Putnam’s performance I would probably call it “The ultimate art of creating the iIlusion”:


Filed under: AEG THE HORRIBLE, Jacksons vs. AEG Tagged: AEG, Marvin Putnam, Michael Jackson
Viewing all 230 articles
Browse latest View live